Anti-IL-5 Pathway Agents in Eosinophilic-Associated Disorders Across the Lifespan.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-5 pathways have revolutionized the treatment expectations for eosinophilic-associated conditions, particularly in patients with respiratory involvement. Mepolizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody), benralizumab (IL-5 receptor blocker monoclonal antibody), and reslizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody) have collectively contributed to the overall improvement of the disease burden in various conditions. Eosinophilic asthma currently boasts the most robust evidence across all age groups: all three biologics are approved for adults (aged ≥18 years); mepolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also in children (aged ≥ 6 years), while bernalizumab was recently approved by the FDA for patients aged ≥6 years in the USA. In chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, subcutaneous mepolizumab is the only anti-IL-5 therapy approved so far and can be used in adult patients (aged ≥18 years). For eosinophilic esophagitis, conflicting evidence surrounds both mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, leading to non-approval of these agents by the FDA/EMA. Recently, mepolizumab was approved for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients aged ≥6 years or older and for hypereosinophilic syndrome adult patients. A phase III trial proving noninferiority of benralizumab versus mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis has been recently published, while evidence on reslizumab is scant. Overall, current evidence on anti-IL-5 biologics for eosinophilic-associated disorders is mostly focused on adults, whereas data for individuals aged under 18 years and over 65 years are scarce, resulting in a lack of evidence, particularly regarding efficacy, for the use of anti-IL-5 agents in these specific patient populations. This review addresses high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world post-marketing studies regarding the use of anti-IL-5 therapies for eosinophilic-associated disorders across all age groups, spanning childhood, adulthood, and older age.

Treatment strategies for ANCA-associated vasculitides: from standard protocols to future horizons.

INTRODUCTION: ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV), classified into granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis represent a group of disorders characterized by necrotizing vasculitis of small vessels, endothelial injury and tissue damage. The outcomes and prognosis of AAV have undergone significant changes with the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil). The enhanced understanding of pathogenesis has subsequently led to the incorporation into clinical practice of drugs targeting specific therapeutic targets. AREAS COVERED: After an extensive literature search of Pubmed, Medline, Embase of the most recent evidence, we provide an overview of available treatments, highlighting how newer drugs have integrated into standard protocols. Our review also explores potential new therapeutic targets, including B cell depletion and inhibition, T cell inhibition, complement inhibition, and IL-5 and IgE inhibition. EXPERT OPINION: There is hope that the new treatment targets currently under study in AAV may enable a faster and more lasting clinical response, ensuring the reduction of possible side effects from therapies. Moreover, numerous aspects necessitate further exploration in the future, such as tailoring of GCs, integration of GCs-sparing agents, efficacy of combination therapy, optimal maintenance therapy, to reduce organ-damage and improve quality of life.

Monocentric study of IL-5 monoclonal antibody induction therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

OBJECTIVE: Although sporadic case reports have demonstrated successful management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) by anti-IL-5 therapy, larger-scale monocentric studies for the efficacy of mepolizumab (MEP), an IL-5 monoclonal antibody, are still lacking in Taiwan. METHODS: Hospitalized EGPA patients aged at least 18 years were enrolled from November 1998 to October 2023, and analyzed for demographic, clinical, laboratory, medication and outcome data, focusing on the efficacy and safety of biologics use, particularly induction therapy with MEP. RESULTS: Twenty-seven EGPA patients aged 10-70 years (43 ± 15) at disease diagnosis were recruited with 21 under combined corticosteroids/cyclophosphamide induction therapy. Seventeen patients received biologics with 13 under MEP therapy. Ten patients aged 19-71 years (48 ± 15) completed 12-month induction therapy with a 100 mg quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen indicated for active or relapse disease. There were reduced BVAS with complete remission in 6 and partial remission in 4 patients, lower CRP levels, decreased eosinophil counts with an inhibition of 92∼96 %, and tapered prednisolone dosages from 5 to 25 (13.0 ± 6.3) to 0-10 (3.3 ± 3.1) mg/day. Only one patient had an adverse event of injection site reactions. Nine patients received the same regimen for annual maintenance therapy. All had a persistent clinical remission. In these patients, 13-56 injections (41 ± 15) were prescribed with a follow-up period of 12∼52 months (38 ± 14). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, induction therapy with a 12-month 100 mg MEP quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen demonstrates the efficacy and safety for active and relapsing EGPA patients.

Super-responders to anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5R are characterised by high sputum eosinophil counts at baseline.

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that anti-IL-5(R) biologics were able to improve lung function, asthma control and chronic oral corticosteroid exposure and reduce exacerbations among eosinophilic asthmatic patients. However, a certain variability in clinical responses to anti-IL-5(R) biologics was brought to light. Our study aimed at evaluating the role of baseline sputum eosinophils in identifying super-responders to mepolizumab and benralizumab. Our study reinforces the importance to examine sputum eosinophils in patients suffering from severe asthma before starting a biologic as it is associated with the intensity of response to mepolizumab and benralizumab.

Targeting the interleukin-5 pathway improves cough hypersensitivity in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

BACKGROUND: Capsaicin cough sensitivity (C-CS) reflects airway neuronal dysfunction and may be a significant biomarker of asthma. Although mepolizumab reduces cough in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, it is unclear whether the cough reduction is associated with improved C-CS. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the effect of biologics on C-CS and cough-specific quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma using our previous study cohort. METHODS: Overall, 52 consecutive patients who visited our hospital for severe uncontrolled asthma were included in the original study cohort, and 30 patients were eligible for this study. Changes in C-CS and cough-specific QoL were compared between patients treated with the anti-interleukin-5 (IL-5) pathway (n = 16) and those treated with other biologics (n = 14). The C-CS was measured as the concentration of capsaicin required to induce at least 5 coughs. RESULTS: Biologics significantly improved C-CS (P = .03). Anti-IL-5 pathway therapies significantly improved C-CS, whereas other biologics did not (P < .01 and P = .89, respectively). The C-CS improved significantly more in the anti-IL-5 pathway group than in the group treated with other biologics (P = .02). Changes in C-CS significantly correlated with improvements in cough-specific QoL in the anti-IL-5 pathway group (r = 0.58, P = .01) but not in the group treated with other biologics (r = 0.35, P = .22). CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-5 pathway therapies improve C-CS and cough-specific QoL, and targeting the IL-5 pathway may be a therapeutic strategy for cough hypersensitivity in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Mepolizumab para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica / Mepolizumab for the treatment of severe asthma eosinophilic

INTRODUCCIÓN: Según la Guía 2021 de la Iniciativa Global para el Asma (Global Initiative for Asthma-GINA), institución creada en 1993 en colaboración entre el Instituto Nacional de Salud de EEUU (NIH) y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), si bien existen parámetros para determinar la gravedad del asma, la misma debe establecerse en forma retrospectiva, después de haber tratado al paciente por lo menos durante 2 o 3 meses y haber evaluado el resultado de la terapia en términos del control de los síntomas y reducción de las exacerbaciones. El asma se considera grave cuando presenta dificultad para su control a pesar del tratamiento optimizado con dosis altas de corticosteroides inhalados (CI) y ß-2 adrenérgicos de acción corta. Se estima que el asma grave posee una prevalencia de 5-10% respecto a la población asmática. Con respecto al parámetro "control del asma", incluye dos componentes: el control de síntomas y el riesgo futuro. La función pulmonar constituye un aspecto importante en la evaluación del riesgo y en la evolución del cuadro clínico. El asma grave presenta pruebas funcionales iniciales que muestran VEF1 y/o PFE < 60 %. Es recomendable medir estos parámetros en forma basal al inicio del tratamiento, y luego de 3 a 6 meses de aplicar la terapéutica seleccionada (para identificar la mejor marca personal del paciente) y posteriormente en forma periódica, medir su evolución. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la eficacia, seguridad, recomendaciones de las principales GPC, políticas de cobertura y aspectos económicos de mepolizumab para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos y niños ≥ 6 años con asma grave eosinofílica. METODOLOGÍA: Se identificaron estudios contra placebo y comparaciones indirectas. Luego de la evaluación de la calidad de los estudios identificados se incluyen en este informe una revisión sistemática, dos metaanálisis en red para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de mepolizumab comparada con placebo y fármacos biológicos en pacientes con asma grave eosinofílica. Adicionalmente fueron incluidas 7 guías de practica clínica y 6 políticas de cobertura. No fueron identificados estudios en pacientes menores de 12 años, ni que comparen de manera directa la respuesta a los fármacos biológicos entre sí para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica, , como tampoco estudios de 5 o más años de duración para estimar la seguridad a largo plazo. RESULTADOS: Se presentan los resultados globales de la búsqueda bibliográfica y el flujograma que muestra las distintas instancias de valoración de los artículos identificados, de acuerdo a los criterios de inclusión y exclusión definidos a través de los componentes de la pregunta PICO, concluyendo con el número de artículos seleccionados para el contenido del presente informe. Se identificaron estudios contra placebo y comparaciones indirectas. Luego de la evaluación de la calidad de los estudios identificados se incluyen en este informe una revisión sistemática (RS), dos metaanálisis en red (MAR) para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de mepolizumab comparada con placebo y comparaciones indirectas entre los productos biológicos en pacientes con asma grave eosinofílica. Adicionalmente fueron incluidas 7 guías de práctica clínica y 6 políticas de cobertura. No fueron identificados estudios en pacientes menores de 12 años, ni que comparen de manera directa la respuesta a los fármacos biológicos entre sí para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica. CONCLUSIONES: Con respecto a la eficacia, de mepolizumab comparado con placebo: Disminuye un 7% las exacerbaciones que requieren internación (evidencia de alta calidad). No disminuye la utilización de medicación de rescate (evidencia de alta calidad). Probablemente mejora el control del asma (sin alcanzar la diferencia mínima relevante), la calidad de vida (evaluada con cuestionario no específico para asma) y la función pulmonar (evidencia de moderada calidad). Con respecto a la eficacia, de mepolizumab comparado a otros biológicos: No existe evidencia que compare de manera directa la efectividad y seguridad de mepolizumab versus otros comparadores activos como benralizumab y/o dupilumab. Evidencia de baja calidad (comparaciones indirectas) sugiere que podría no haber diferencias en la reducción del número de exacerbaciones anuales entre ellos. Con respecto a su seguridad el efecto es muy incierto y se carece de estudios de larga duración (evidencia de muy baja calidad): No existen comparaciones directas de mepolizumab con otros biológicos. No existen ECAs que evalúen niños ≤ 12 años de edad. Con respecto al impacto económico: El costo anual de tratamiento por paciente del mepolizumab es el menor de los 3 medicamentos estudiados. El costo anual de tratamiento por paciente con mepolizumab es un 38,1% menor que con benralizumab y un 78,2% menor que con dupilumab. El costo farmacológico del tratamiento anual de toda la población con asma grave eosinofílica supera el umbral de alto impacto presupuestario en 81 veces sin la introducción del mepolizumab y en 53,7 veces en el escenario con utilización del mismo.

A Phase 1 study of the long-acting anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody GSK3511294 in patients with asthma.

AIMS: GSK3511294 is a humanized anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) engineered for extended half-life and improved IL-5 affinity versus other anti-IL-5 mAbs. This study examined its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and effect on blood eosinophil counts. METHODS: This was a double-blind, parallel-group, single-ascending-dose, multicenter, Phase 1 study (205 722;NCT03287310) in patients with asthma and a blood eosinophil count ≥200 cells µL-1 . Patients were randomized 3:1 within dose cohorts to receive a single subcutaneous dose of GSK3511294 (2, 10, 30, 100 or 300 mg) or placebo and followed for up to 40 weeks to assess safety (primary endpoint), ratio to baseline in blood eosinophil count, plasma PK parameters and frequency/titers of binding antidrug antibodies (all secondary). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients received the study drug and completed the study. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92% of placebo-treated and 81% of GSK3511294-treated patients. There were no AEs leading to study withdrawal or serious AEs; hypersensitivity (one event in one patient) and injection-site reaction (three events in two patients) occurred infrequently. Marked reductions (>48%) in blood eosinophil count were seen from 24 hours post-dose with all GSK3511294 doses but not placebo; suppression was maintained for longer with increasing dose (82% and 83% adjusted reductions vs placebo with 100 and 300 mg, respectively, at week 26). PK were linear and dose proportional over the dose range; terminal half-life was 38-53 days. CONCLUSIONS: GSK3511294 was well tolerated, with linear and dose proportional PK, extended half-life and blood eosinophil count reduction, supporting less frequent dosing versus other anti-IL-5 mAbs.

PI3Kδ inhibition prevents IL33, ILC2s and inflammatory eosinophils in persistent airway inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Phosphoinositide-3-kinase-delta (PI3Kδ) inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach for inflammatory conditions due to its role in leucocyte proliferation, migration and activation. However, the effect of PI3Kδ inhibition on group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and inflammatory eosinophils remains unknown. Using a murine model exhibiting persistent airway inflammation we sought to understand the effect of PI3Kδ inhibition, montelukast and anti-IL5 antibody treatment on IL33 expression, group-2-innate lymphoid cells, inflammatory eosinophils, and goblet cell metaplasia. RESULTS: Mice were sensitised to house dust mite and after allowing inflammation to resolve, were re-challenged with house dust mite to re-initiate airway inflammation. ILC2s were found to persist in the airways following house dust mite sensitisation and after re-challenge their numbers increased further along with accumulation of inflammatory eosinophils. In contrast to montelukast or anti-IL5 antibody treatment, PI3Kδ inhibition ablated IL33 expression and prevented group-2-innate lymphoid cell accumulation. Only PI3Kδ inhibition and IL5 neutralization reduced the infiltration of inflammatory eosinophils. Moreover, PI3Kδ inhibition reduced goblet cell metaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Hence, we show that PI3Kδ inhibition dampens allergic inflammatory responses by ablating key cell types and cytokines involved in T-helper-2-driven inflammatory responses.

Porcine-Stimulated Human Tr1 Cells Showed Enhanced Suppression in Xenoantigen Stimulation Response.

Type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells play a fundamental role in maintaining and inducing immune tolerance. Our preliminary study demonstrated that an interleukin- (IL-) 10-mediated pathway is a possible regulatory mechanism underlying the xenoantigen-specific human Treg enhanced suppressive capacity. Here, we developed a feasible protocol for expanding IL-10-induced xenoantigen-specific human Tr1 cells in vitro which would be more efficient in transplantation immunotherapy efficiency. In this study, xenoantigen-specific Tr1 cells are generated from human naive CD4+ T cells expanded for two subsequent xenoantigen-stimulation cycles with recombinant human IL-10. The phenotype and suppressive capacity of xenoantigen-stimulated Tr1 cells are assessed, and the mechanism of their suppression is studied. Tr1 cells can be induced by porcine xenoantigen stimulation combined with IL-10, IL-2, and IL-15, displaying an increased expression of CD49b, CTLA-4, and LAG-3 without expressing Foxp3 which also showed an effector memory Treg phenotype and expressed high levels of CD39. After xenoantigen stimulation, the IL-10 and IL-5 gene expression in Tr1 cells increased, secreting more IL-10, and xenoantigen-stimulated Tr1 cells changed their T cell receptor (TCR) Vß repertoire, increasing the expression of TCR Vß2, TCR Vß9, and TCR Vß13. In a pig to human mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), xenoantigen-stimulated Tr1 cells displayed enhanced suppressive capacity via CD39 in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, IL-5 could affect the proliferation of xenoantigen-specific Tr1 cells, but not their phenotypes' expression. This study provides a theory and feasible method for immune tolerance induction in clinical xenotransplantation.

Anti-Interleukin-5 in the Management of Eosinophilic Asthma: A Review of Effectiveness, Safety, and Budgetary Impact From the Perspective of the Brazilian Health System.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 class therapy agents in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma and the financial impact of these drugs on the Brazilian and Mato Grosso public health systems. METHODS: The literature review in important databases was guided by a structured research question including patient or population, intervention, comparator, outcome and type of study. The retrieved studies went through a screening, selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment process. A model with two scenarios, one with mepolizumab and the other with benralizumab, was created for budget impact analysis. RESULTS: Evidence indicated that anti-interleukins-5 have an acceptable safety profile and can reduce exacerbation rates by up to 50% in the population with eosinophilic asthma; however, they showed no significant difference in quality of life. The adoption of these drugs in the Brazilian health system can impact the budget from R$ 40,379,731.50 to R$ 140,301,211.34 depending on the drug incorporated, considering a time horizon of 5 years. From the perspective of the state of Mato Grosso, the budget impact may reach, in the fifth year, an amount of R$ 1,301,210.58 and R$ 2,050.687.62 for the scenarios with mepolizumab and benralizumab, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anti-interleukins-5 are promising treatments for eosinophilic asthma because they minimise exacerbations and are well tolerated and safe. The financial impact is large, implying that technology costs may be a barrier to accessing this treatment class.

Treatment of lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES): what to consider after confirming the elusive diagnosis.

Lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is a rare disease driven by immunophenotypically aberrant T cells producing eosinophilopoetic cytokines such as interleukin-5 (IL-5). Treatment is challenging because L-HES is relatively steroid resistant and not amenable to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We searched the literature for clinical trials and observational studies, including case reports, of patients treated for L-HES. In all, 25 studies were selected; two were randomised controlled trials of IL-5 blockade, which included some patients with L-HES, and the rest were observational studies. Corticosteroids are often used as first-line therapy, but patients with L-HES have lower response rates than other types of HES. Treatments that reduce symptoms and steroid dependence in some patients include interferon-alpha (IFN-α), anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, cyclosporine and mycophenolate. These drugs target T-cell activation and proliferation, or IL-5 directly. Although effective, IFN-α and cyclosporine were commonly reported to cause side-effects resulting in discontinuation. Alemtuzumab can induce remissions, but these are generally short lived. The anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies mepolizumab and benralizumab are effective and well tolerated, but with a high rate of relapse once withdrawn. Hydroxyurea, methotrexate, imatinib were unsuccessful in most patients studied. More prospective clinical trials are needed for patients with L-HES.

Changes in Serum MicroRNAs after Anti-IL-5 Biological Treatment of Severe Asthma.

There is currently enough evidence to think that miRNAs play a role in several key points in asthma, including diagnosis, severity of the disease, and response to treatment. Cells release different types of lipid double-membrane vesicles into the extracellular microenvironment, including exosomes, which function as very important elements in intercellular communication. They are capable of distributing genetic material, mRNA, mitochondrial DNA, and microRNAs (miRNAs). Serum miRNA screening was performed in order to analyze possible changes in serum miRNAs in 10 patients treated with reslizumab and 6 patients with mepolizumab after 8 weeks of treatment. The expression of miR-338-3p was altered after treatment (p < 0.05), although no significant differences between reslizumab and mepolizumab were found. Bioinformatic analysis showed that miR-338-3p regulates important pathways in asthma, such as the MAPK and TGF-ß signaling pathways and the biosynthesis/degradation of glucans (p < 0.05). However, it did not correlate with an improvement in lung function. MiRNA-338-3p could be used as a biomarker of early response to reslizumab and mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthmatic patients. In fact, this miRNA could be involved in airway remodeling, targeting genes related to MAPK and TGF-ß signaling pathways.

Treatment Challenges in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Differential Response to Anti-IL-5 and Anti-IL-5R Therapy.

Severe asthma greatly affects patients' quality of life. Major advances have occurred in the management of severe eosinophilic asthma the past few years due to the new targeted biological therapies. There are three anti-IL-5 mAbs, mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab. Despite the different mechanism of blocking IL-5 the clinical effects are quite similar as randomized controlled trials and real-life studies have shown. Moreover, there are reports of responding to one after failing to respond to another anti-IL-5 therapy. Accordingly, it is challenging to explore the possible differences in the response to anti-IL-5 treatments. This might help us not only understand possible mechanisms that contribute to the resistance to treatment in this particular asthma endotype, but also to phenotype within severe eosinophilic asthma in order to treat our patients more efficiently.

Treating severe asthma: Targeting the IL-5 pathway.

Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes based on clinical, functional or inflammatory parameters. In particular, the eosinophilic phenotype is associated with type 2 inflammation and increased levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13). Monoclonal antibodies that target the eosinophilic inflammatory pathways (IL-5R and IL-5), namely mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, are effective and safe for severe eosinophilic asthma. Eosinophils threshold represents the most indicative biomarker for response to treatment with all three monoclonal antibodies. Improvement in asthma symptoms scores, lung function, the number of exacerbations, history of late-onset asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, low oral corticosteroids use and low body mass index represent predictive clinical markers of response. Novel Omics studies are emerging with proteomics data and exhaled breath analyses. These may prove useful as biomarkers of response and non-response biologics. Moreover, future biomarker studies need to be undertaken in paediatric patients affected by severe asthma. The choice of appropriate biologic therapy for severe asthma remains challenging. The importance of finding biomarkers that can predict response continuous an open issue that needs to be further explored. This review describes the clinical effects of targeting the IL-5 pathway in severe asthma in adult and paediatric patients, focusing on predictors of response and non-response.