Normothermic Preservation of the Intestinal Allograft.

Intestinal allotransplantation was first described in the 1960s and successfully performed in the 1980s. Since that time, less progress has been made in the preservation of the allograft before transplantation and static cold storage remains the current standard. Normothermic machine perfusion represents an opportunity to simultaneously preserve, assess, and recondition the organ for transplantation and improve the procurement radius for allografts. The substantial progress made in the field during the last 60 years, coupled with the success of the preclinical animal model of machine perfusion-preserved intestinal transplantation, suggest we are approaching the point of clinical application.

Indications for Intestinal Transplantation.

Outcomes for patients with chronic intestinal failure have improved with organization of experts into multidisciplinary teams delivering care in intestinal rehabilitation programs. There have been improvements in understanding of intestinal failure complications as well as development of newer therapies that have amplified the improvements in survival. In spite of this encouraging trend, patients who fail PN are often referred too late for intestinal transplantation. The author proposes a more rational framework that might allow earlier identification of intestinal failure patients at risk for PN-failure, who could appropriately be considered earlier for intestinal transplantation with improvements in overall outcomes.

Abdominal Wall Closure in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: A State-Of-The-Art Review of Vascularized Abdominal Wall and Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation.

Failure to close the abdomen after intestinal or multivisceral transplantation (Tx) remains a frequently occurring problem. Two attractive reconstruction methods, especially in large abdominal wall defects, are full-thickness abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft (AW-VCA) and nonvascularized rectus fascia (NVRF) Tx. This review compares surgical technique, immunology, integration, clinical experience, and indications of both techniques. In AW-VCA Tx, vascular anastomosis is required and the graft undergoes hypotrophy post-Tx. Furthermore, it has immunologic benefits and good clinical outcome. NVRF Tx is an easy technique without the need for vascular anastomosis. Moreover, a rapid integration and neovascularization occurs with excellent clinical outcome.

Intestinal Transplantation: Include the Spleen with Intestinal Graft?

The traditional procedure for multivisceral transplant (MVT) is to transplant the stomach, pancreas, intestine, and liver en bloc. During surgery, the native spleen is routinely removed from the recipient, and it usually creates more space in the abdomen to insert the allogeneic graft. Thus, recipients often become asplenic after MVT. Considering all of the risks and benefits, we advocate that temporary transplant of the donor spleen could be the best option for MVT recipients; it could potentially reduce the rate of intestinal allograft rejection without increasing the risk for graft-versus-host disease.

Intestinal Transplant for Hirschsprung's Disease: Stoma for Life or Not?

Hirschsprung's disease is a dysmotility disease caused by lack of ganglion cells in the bowel wall that can affect varying lengths of the intestine. In extreme circumstances, there can be little remaining ganglionated bowel, and the patient becomes dependent on parental nutrition (PN) for survival. Intestinal transplant has been utilized to salvage these patients suffering terminal complications of PN. The question as to whether to reestablish intestinal continuity, and thus not require a stoma is vexed. However, data and experience would suggest this can be safely done with good functional results.

Should a Stoma Be Used After Intestinal Transplant.

As we all acknowledge benefits of ostomies, they can come with significant morbidity, quality of life issues, and major complications, especially during reversal procedures. In recent years, we have started to observe that similar graft and patient survival can be achieved without ostomies in certain cases. This observation and practice adopted in a few large-volume transplant centers opened a new discussion about the necessity of ostomies in intestinal transplantation. There is still more time and randomized studies will be needed to better understand and analyze the risk/benefits of "No-ostomy" approach in intestinal transplantation.

Abdominal Organ Transplantation: Noteworthy Literature in 2023.

This review highlights noteworthy literature published in 2023 and pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. We feature 9 studies from 593 peer-reviewed papers on pancreatic transplantation, 3 from 194 on intestinal transplantation, and 28 from over 4513 on kidney transplantation. The liver transplantation section includes a special focus on 20 studies from 5666 clinical trial publications. We explore a broad range of topics, including donor management, perioperative recipient management, and innovative pharmacologic and mechanical interventions tested for the improvement of patient and graft outcomes and survival.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Intestine.

Intestine remains the least frequently transplanted solid organ, although the survival and quality-of-life benefits of transplant to individuals with irreversible intestinal failure have been well demonstrated. The trend seen over the past 15 years of fewer listings and fewer transplants appears to be continuing, most noticeably in infants, children, and adolescents. There were only 146 additions to the intestine waiting list in 2022, and the proportion of adult candidates continues to increase, so that now 61% of the intestine waiting list are adult candidates. There has been little change in the distribution by sex, race and ethnicity, or primary diagnosis on the waiting list, or for those receiving transplant. The transplant rate for adults has decreased to 55.6 transplants per 100 patient-years, but the pediatric transplant rate remains relatively stable at 22.8 transplants per 100 patient-years. The decrease in transplant rates for adults is primarily the result of falling rates for those listed for combined intestine-liver, and this is reflected in the pretransplant mortality rates, which are twice as high for candidates in need of both organs compared with those listed for intestine alone. Overall, intestine transplant numbers decreased to a total of 82 intestine transplants in 2022, only one above the lowest ever value of 81 in 2019. No major changes were seen in the immunosuppression protocols, with most recipients having induction therapy and tacrolimus-based maintenance. Graft failure rates appear to have improved at 1, 3, and 5 years for intestine without liver, but this is not seen for combined intestine-liver. Graft and patient survival are better for pediatric recipients compared with adult recipients for both liver-inclusive and liver-exclusive transplant. Rates of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are higher for recipients of intestine without liver.

Timing and Complications of Intestinal Ostomy Takedown After Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomies are typically created at the time of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation to assist in graft monitoring with endoscopy and biopsies. Often, these ostomies are reversed with a takedown procedure once there is stable graft function, but data are limited on associated complications of the takedown procedure for patients with intestinal transplants. METHODS: To assess complications associated with takedowns in this patient population, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had an intestinal transplant with elective ostomy takedown after transplant. No prisoners were used in the study and this manuscript is in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients, 10 isolated patients with intestinal transplants and 6 patients with multivisceral transplants, were included in the study, and takedown occurred at a mean of (236.8 ± 117.1) days after transplant. Of the 16 patients, 5 patients (31%) had uncomplicated courses after takedown with no infection, no rejection, and no hospital readmission within 3 months of takedown. The rest of the patients (69%) developed either infection or rejection within 3 months of takedown, and 1 patient died of infection after ileostomy takedown. CONCLUSION: This case series highlights the high risk of complications after ileostomy takedown for patients with intestinal transplants and contributes to the growing debate regarding the role of ileostomy creation and reversal in patients with intestinal transplants.

Endoscopic Surveillance of the Intestinal Allograft: Recommendations From the Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association Working Group.

Intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection lacks a reliable noninvasive biomarker and rejection surveillance relies on serial endoscopies and mucosal biopsies followed by histologic assessment. Endoscopic biopsies are also essential for identifying other ITx-related complications such as infectious, allergic, and inflammatory graft enteritis as well as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease or graft versus host disease. In spite of its central role in ITx, published guidelines on endoscopy and biopsy are lacking and significant variability between centers in terms of timing and technical performance exists. Therefore, an international expert group convened and discussed several aspects related to the surveillance endoscopy after ITx with the aim to summarize and standardize its practice. This article summarizes these considerations on endoscopic ITx monitoring and highlights practices of surveillance and for-cause endoscopy, biopsy techniques, pathologic evaluation, potential risks and complications, outsourcing, and less-invasive monitoring techniques.

Innovative surgical techniques in the intestine and multivisceral transplant.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This timely review delves into the evolution of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) over the past six decades underscoring how advancements in surgical techniques and immunosuppression have driven transformation, to provide insight into the historical development of MVT, shedding light on its journey from experimentation to a valuable clinical approach. RECENT FINDINGS: The review presents contemporary enhancements in surgical methods within the context of intestinal transplantation. The versatility of MVT is emphasized, accommodating diverse organ combinations and techniques. Both isolated intestinal transplantation (IIT) and MVT have seen expanded indications, driven by improved parenteral nutrition, transplantation outcomes, and surgical innovations. Surgical techniques are tailored based on graft type, with various approaches for isolated transplantation. Preservation strategies and ostomy techniques are also covered, along with graft assessment advancements involving donor-specific antibodies. SUMMARY: This review's findings underscore the remarkable evolution of MVT from experimental origins to a comprehensive clinical practice. The progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has broadened the spectrum of patients who can benefit from intestinal transplant, including both IIT and MVT. The expansion of indications offers hope to patients with complex gastrointestinal disorders. The detection of donor-specific antibodies in graft assessment advances diagnostic accuracy, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Nutrition support considerations in pediatric small bowel transplantation.

Enteral autonomy is the primary goal of intestinal failure therapy. Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is an option when enteral autonomy cannot be achieved and management complications become life-threatening. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing medical literature related to nutrition requirements, nutrition status, and nutrition support after pediatric ITx. Achieving or maintaining adequate growth after intestinal transplant in children can be challenging because of episodes of rejection that require the use of corticosteroids, occurrences of infection that require a reduction or discontinuation of enteral or parenteral support, and fat malabsorption caused by impaired lymphatic circulation. Nutrient requirements should be assessed and modified regularly based on nutrition status, growth, ventilatory status, wound healing, and the presence of complications. Parenteral nutrition (PN) should be initiated as a continuous infusion early postoperatively. Enteral support should be initiated after evidence of graft bowel function and in the absence of clinical complications. Foods high in simple carbohydrates should be limited, as consumption may result in osmotic diarrhea. Short-term use of a fat-free diet followed by a low-fat diet may reduce the risk of the development of chylous ascites. Micronutrient deficiencies and food allergies are common occurrences after pediatric ITx. Enteral/oral vitamin and mineral supplementation may be required after PN is weaned. Nutrition management of children after ITx can be challenging for all members of the healthcare team. Anthropometric parameters and micronutrient status should be monitored regularly so that interventions to promote growth and prevent or reverse nutrient deficiencies can be implemented promptly.

Liver Inclusion Appears to Be Protective Against Graft Loss-Due-to Chronic But Not Acute Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation.

In intestinal transplantation, while other centers have shown that liver-including allografts have significantly more favorable graft survival and graft loss-due-to chronic rejection (CHR) rates, our center has consistently shown that modified multivisceral (MMV) and full multivisceral (MV) allografts have significantly more favorable acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe ACR rates compared with isolated intestine (I) and liver-intestine (LI) allografts. In the attempt to resolve this apparent discrepancy, we performed stepwise Cox multivariable analyses of the hazard rates of developing graft loss-due-to acute rejection (AR) vs. CHR among 350 consecutive intestinal transplants at our center with long-term follow-up (median: 13.5 years post-transplant). Observed percentages developing graft loss-due-to AR and CHR were 14.3% (50/350) and 6.6% (23/350), respectively. Only one baseline variable was selected into the Cox model indicating a significantly lower hazard rate of developing graft loss-due-to AR: Transplant Type MMV or MV (p < 0.000001). Conversely, two baseline variables were selected into the Cox model indicating a significantly lower hazard rate of developing graft loss-due-to CHR: Received Donor Liver (LI or MV) (p = 0.002) and Received Induction (p = 0.007). In summary, while MMV/MV transplants (who receive extensive native lymphoid tissue removal) offered protection against graft loss-due-to AR, liver-containing grafts appeared to offer protection against graft loss-due-to CHR, supporting the results of other studies.

Pediatric intestine and multivisceral transplant.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation (ITx, MVTx) is the cornerstone in treatment of irreversible intestinal failure (IF) and complications related to parenteral nutrition. This review aims to highlight the unique aspects of the subject in pediatrics. RECENT FINDINGS: Etiology of intestinal failure (IF) in children shares some similarity with adults but several unique considerations when being evaluated for transplantation will be discussed. Owing to significant advancement in IF management and home parenteral nutrition (PN), indication criteria for pediatric transplantation continues to be updated. Outcomes have continued to improve with current long-term patient and graft survival in multicenter registry reports reported at 66.1% and 48.8% at 5 years, respectively. Pediatric specific surgical challenges such abdominal closure, post transplantation outcomes, and quality of life are discussed in this review. SUMMARY: ITx and MVTx remain lifesaving treatment for many children with IF. However long-term graft function is still a major challenge.

Addressing extreme size mismatch in pediatric intestinal transplantation: Outcomes of intestinal length reduction.

BACKGROUND: Bench liver reduction, with or without intestinal length reduction (LR) (coupled with delayed closure and abdominal wall prostheses), has been a strategy adopted by our program for small children due to the limited availability of size-matched donors. This report describes the short, medium, and long-term outcomes of this graft reduction strategy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis of children that underwent intestinal transplantation (April 1993 to December 2020) was performed. Patients were grouped according to whether they received an intestinal graft of full length (FL) or following LR. RESULTS: Overall, 105 intestinal transplants were performed. The LR group (n = 10) was younger (14.5 months vs. 40.0 months, p = .012) and smaller (8.7 kg vs. 13.0 kg, p = .032) compared to the FL group (n = 95). Similar abdominal closure rates were achieved after LR, without any increase in abdominal compartment syndrome (1/10 vs. 7/95, p = .806). The 90-day graft and patient survival were similar (9/10, 90% vs. 83/95, 86%; p = .810). Medium and long-term graft survival at 1 year (8/10, 80% vs. 65/90, 71%; p = .599), and 5 years (5/10, 50% vs. 42/84, 50%; p = 1.00) was similar. CONCLUSION: LR of intestinal grafts appears to be a safe strategy for infants and small children requiring intestinal transplantation. This technique should be considered in the situation of significant size mismatch of intestine containing grafts.

Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years. AREAS COVERED: Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report: Intestine.

There has been just over 30 years of experience in clinical intestine transplant. A rise in demand until 2007 with improving transplant outcomes preceded a subsequent fall in demand due, at least in part, to improvements in pretransplant care of patients with intestinal failure. Over the past 10 to 12 years, there has been no suggestion of an increase in demand and, particularly for adult transplant, there may be a continued trend toward fewer additions to the waiting list and fewer transplants, especially in those needing combined intestine-liver transplant. In addition, over the same period there has been no noticeable improvement in graft survival, with 1- and 5-year graft failure rates averaging 21.6% and 52.5%, respectively, for intestine-alone transplants and 28.6% and 47.2%, respectively, for combined intestine-liver allografts.

Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection Led to Resection of the Graft in a Small Bowel Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Infection due to multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common cause of graft resection after small bowel transplantation. We report a failed case in which the intestinal graft was resected 18 days after the operation due to postoperative infection with multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae and a literature review of other common causes of small bowel transplantation failure have been reported. METHODS: A female, 29 years of age, underwent partial living small bowel transplantation for short bowel syndrome. After the operation, the patient was infected with multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae, even though various anti-infective regimens were employed. It further developed into sepsis and disseminated into intravascular coagulation, leading to exfoliation and necrosis of the intestinal mucosa. Finally, the intestinal graft had to be resected to save the patient's life. RESULTS: Multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae infection often affects the biological function of intestinal grafts and can even lead to necrosis. Other common causes of failure, including postoperative infection, rejection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-vs-host disease, surgical complications, and other related diseases, were also discussed throughout the literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenesis due to diverse and interrelated factors makes the survival of intestinal allografts a great challenge. Therefore, only by fully understanding and mastering the common causes of surgical failure can the success rate of small bowel transplantation be effectively improved.

The importance of avoiding time-dependent bias when testing the prognostic value of an intervening event - Two acute cellular rejection examples in intestinal transplantation.

In testing the prognostic value of the occurrence of an intervening event (clinical event that occurs posttransplant), 3 proper statistical methodologies for testing its prognostic value exist (time-dependent covariate, landmark, and semi-Markov modeling methods). However, time-dependent bias has appeared in many clinical reports, whereby the intervening event is statistically treated as a baseline variable (as if it occurred at transplant). Using a single-center cohort of 445 intestinal transplant cases to test the prognostic value of first acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe (grade of) ACR on the hazard rate of developing graft loss, we demonstrate how the inclusion of such time-dependent bias can lead to severe underestimation of the true hazard ratio (HR). The (statistically more powerful) time-dependent covariate method in Cox's multivariable model yielded significantly unfavorable effects of first ACR (P < .0001; HR = 2.492) and severe ACR (P < .0001; HR = 4.531). In contrast, when using the time-dependent biased approach, multivariable analysis yielded an incorrect conclusion for the prognostic value of first ACR (P = .31, HR = 0.877, 35.2% of 2.492) and a much smaller estimated effect of severe ACR (P = .0008; HR = 1.589; 35.1% of 4.531). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of avoiding time-dependent bias when testing the prognostic value of an intervening event.

Pediatric intestine transplant cost: Analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System database.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate costs from transplant to discharge in children who had undergone intestine transplant. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of pediatric intestine transplant recipients from 2004 through 2020, utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System database. Standardized costs were applied to all charges and converted to 2021 US dollars. We analyzed the association of cost from transplant to discharge with age, sex, race and ethnicity, length of stay, insurance type, transplant year, short bowel syndrome diagnosis, liver-containing graft, hospitalization status, and immunosuppressive regimen. Predictors with a P value <0.20 in univariable analysis were included in a multivariable model, which was reduced using backwards selection with a P value of 0.05. RESULTS: We identified 376 intestinal transplant recipients across nine centers (median age, 2 years; 44% female). Most patients had short bowel syndrome (294; 78%). The liver was included in 218 transplants (58%). Median posttransplant cost was $263,724 (interquartile range [IQR], $179,564-$384,147), and length of stay was 51.5 days (IQR, 34-77). In the final model, increased cost from transplant to hospital discharge was associated with liver-containing graft (+$31,805; P = 0.028), T-cell-depleting antibody use (+$77,004; P < 0.001), and mycophenolate mofetil use (+$50,514; P = 0.012) while controlling for insurance type and length of stay. A 60-day posttransplant hospital stay would cost an estimated $272,533. CONCLUSIONS: Intestine transplant has high immediate cost and long length of stay that varies by center, graft type, and immunosuppression regimen. Future work will examine the cost-effectiveness of various management strategies before and after transplant.