Rhabdomyolysis Suspected to be Caused by Eravacycline Therapy: A Case Report.

Eravacycline is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. It is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic belonging to the tetracycline class with a broad-spectrum of activity and an appealing side effect profile. This report describes a 74-year-old female who presented to the hospital with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) requiring coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After surgery, she developed a sternal wound infection that grew multidrug resistant organisms, leading to a much longer than anticipated hospital stay. Eravacycline was eventually added to the antimicrobial regimen for the persistent infection. Shortly after therapy with eravacycline began, the patient started experiencing muscle pain and the creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level was noted to be elevated. Other causes, such as concomitant administration of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, were explored in this case but not thought to be the cause of rhabdomyolysis. The patient's CPK dropped considerably upon discontinuation of the novel antibiotic, and symptoms resolved. The adverse drug event was reported to the drug manufacturer; however, there are no reports up until this time that address a possible relationship between eravacycline administration and the development of rhabdomyolysis.

Intra-abdominal infection after tumor surgery: tigecycline combined with ß-lactam antibiotics versus tigecycline alone.

BACKGROUNDS: Tigecycline has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. However, it is debatable whether tigecycline should be used alone or in combination. This study aimed to investigate whether tigecycline plus ß-lactam antibiotics (combination therapy [CT] group) are superior to tigecycline alone (monotherapy [MT] group) in non-critically ill intra-abdominal infection patients after tumor surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were clinical success rate, microbial eradication rate, relapse rate within one week, course of treatment, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the degree of infection before medication between the MT and CT groups. Univariate comparisons were performed using the chi-squared test for qualitative variables and Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and mortality during hospitalization. The paired samples Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parameters before and after medication. RESULTS: In total, 291 patients were included in the final analysis: 128 in MT group and 163 in CT group. Mortality rate was 6.25% in the MT group and 6.13% in the CT group (P = 0.97). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that carbapenem-resistant organisms (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.36 ~ 61.70) and age > 65 (OR: 1.32, 95% CI:1.19 ~ 3.01) were independent risk factors for death. CT group had a shorter defervescence time (P < 0.05), with less likelihood of relapse (P < 0.05) but had a more significant effect on activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline plus ß-lactam wasn't superior to tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of non-critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. But for advanced age patients with cancer, tigecycline combination therapy maybe a better choice in terms of mortality.

Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem as first-line empiric therapy for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: A study based on the in-vitro surveillance data in China.

BACKGROUND: With the increase in drug resistance rates of pathogens isolated from complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is increasingly used clinically. However, given the high drug cost and the fact that not yet covered by the health insurance payment, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole versus meropenem as a first-line empiric treatment for cIAIs from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS: A decision analytic model with a one-year time horizon was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness based on the entire disease course. Model inputs were mainly obtained from clinical studies, published literature, and publicly available databases. Primary outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (Lys), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed. RESULTS: In the base cases, compared to meropenem, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (-0.77 days per patient) and longer life expectancy (+0.05 LYs and +0.06 QALYs). CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had an ICER of $25517/QALY, which is well below the threshold of $31509 per QALY in China. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the change of the treatment duration of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the parameter that most influenced the results of the ICER. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the optimal strategy in 75% of simulations at $31510/QALY threshold. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole could be considered as a cost-effective option for the empiric treatment of patients with cIAIs in China, and this benefit will be more evident when the price of CAZ-AVI decreases by 23.8%.

STOP Signs: A Population-based Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Antibiotic Duration for Complicated Intraabdominal Infection Before and After the Publication of a Landmark RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial changed antibiotic prescribing in patients with Complicated Intraabdominal Infection (CIAI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CIAI is common and causes significant morbidity. In May 2015, the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial showed equivalent outcomes between four-day and clinically determined antibiotic duration. METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using interrupted time series methods. The STOP-IT publication date was the exposure. Median duration of inpatient antibiotic prescription was the outcome. All adult patients admitted to four hospitals in Calgary, Canada between July 2012 and December 2018 with CIAI who survived at least four days following source control were included. Analysis was stratified by infectious source as appendix or biliary tract (group A) versus other (group B). RESULTS: Among 4384 included patients, clinical and demographic attributes were similar before vs after publication. In Group A, median inpatient antibiotic duration was 3 days and unchanged from the beginning to the end of the study period [adjusted median difference -0.00 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 - 0.37 days]. In Group B, antibiotic duration was shorter at the end of the study period (7.87 vs 6.73 days; -1.14 days, CI-2.37 - 0.09 days), however there was no change in trend following publication (-0.03 days, CI -0.16 - 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: For appendiceal or biliary sources of CIAI, antibiotic duration was commensurate with the experimental arm of STOP-IT. For other sources, antibiotic duration was long and did not change in response to trial publication. Additional implementation science is needed to improve antibiotic stewardship.

Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole vs. meropenem in complicated intra-abdominal infections: Indian subset from RECLAIM.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the safety and efficacy results of the Indian population subset from the RECLAIM trial investigating the non-inferiority of Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) plus metronidazole to meropenem and interprets its relevance. METHODOLOGY: The study design, subjects inclusion criteria, dosage, safety and efficacy evaluations in Indian patients have been followed as per the RECLAIM trial protocol. RESULTS: A total of 142 Indian patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection were enrolled across eight centers in India, 125 of them were randomized to either CAZ-AVI + metronidazole (n = 62) or meropenem (n = 63) group. the clinical cure rates in modified intention-to-treat (MITT; all randomized patients who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study drug) and clinically evaluable (CE , patients who had an evaluable assessment and no protocol deviations) analysis sets, was numerically comparable to the results of overall population for CAZ-AVI + metronidazole [MITT: 82.5% (Overall, n = 429/520) versus 89.3% (Indian, n = 50/56); CE: 91.7% (Overall, n = 376/410) versus 97.8% (Indian, n = 45/46)] and meropenem [MITT: 84.9% (Overall, n = 444/523) versus 84.7% (Indian, n = 50/59); CE: 92.5% (Overall, n = 385/416) versus 95.5% (Indian, n = 42/44)]. No new safety findings were reported in the Indian population. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI + metronidazole proved to be an effective option for critical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and can be considered as an alternative to carbapenems in the ICU setting for the treatment of resistant pathogens.

Biologic treatment or immunomodulation is not associated with postoperative anastomotic complications in abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: There are concerns that biologic treatments or immunomodulation may negatively influence anastomotic healing. This study investigates the relationship between these treatments and anastomotic complications after surgery for Crohn's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on 417 operations for Crohn's disease performed at four Danish hospitals in 2000-2007. Thirty-two patients were preoperatively treated with biologics and 166 were on immunomodulation. In total, 154 were treated with corticosteroids of which 66 had prednisolone 20 mg or more. RESULTS: Anastomotic complications occurred at 13% of the operations. There were no difference in patients on biologic treatment (9% vs. 12% (p = 0.581)) or in patients on immunomodulation (10% vs. 14% (p = 0.263)). Patients on 20 mg prednisolone or more had more anastomotic complications (20% vs. 11% (p = 0.04)). Anastomotic complications were more frequent after a colo-colic anastomosis than after an entero-enteric or entero-colic (33% vs. 12% (p = 0.013)). Patients with anastomotic complications were older (40 years vs. 35 years (p = 0.014)), had longer disease duration (7.5 years vs. 4 years (p = 0.04)), longer operation time (155 min vs. 115 min (p = 0.018)) and more operative bleeding (200 ml vs. 130 ml (p = 0.029)). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative treatment with prednisolone 20 mg or more, operation time and a colo-colic anastomosis as negative predictors of anastomotic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biologic treatment or immunomodulation had no influence on anastomotic complications. The study confirms previous findings of corticosteroids and a colo-colic anastomosis as negative predictors and also that surgical complexity, as expressed by bleeding and operation time, may contribute to anastomotic complications.