Anti-Interleukin-6 and Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Severe Neurologic Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the marked clinical and biological responses of a targeted treatment with anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6)-receptor antibody and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in a patient with a severe, corticoresistant CNS toxicity of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. METHODS: A 58-year-old man was admitted for subacute paraparesis, urinary retention, and ascending paresthesia. He was under treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma. Spine MRI disclosed multiple T2-hyperintense, contrast-enhancing longitudinally extensive lesions. A diagnosis of ICI-related acute transverse myelitis was made. RESULTS: ICIs were immediately discontinued, and the patient received high-dose glucocorticoids plus 1 session of plasma exchange, but he did not improve. Based on the marked elevation of CSF IL-6 (505 pg/mL), a second-line targeted therapy with anti-IL-6-receptor tocilizumab (8 mg/kg/mo for 3 infusions) plus JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (50 mg/d) was administered. Patient neurologic status started to improve shortly after, with corresponding radiologic resolution. At 9 months, the patient was able to walk independently, presenting only slight residual disability while remaining in oncologic partial response. DISCUSSION: Our case suggests that some patients with severe, corticoresistant CNS immune-related toxicities of ICIs may benefit from cytokine blockade. Cytokine measurement in serum and CSF might help in selecting patients for personalized treatment strategies.

Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of CA209-538.

Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy, with poor prognosis and limited treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Chemotherapy is the current standard first-line treatment, providing only a modest survival benefit. There is only limited treatment experience with immunotherapy using single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. To date no clinical trials have been reported using combination immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in this patient population. Methods: CA209-538 is a prospective multicentre clinical trial in patients with advanced rare cancers. Participants received the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV) and the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab (1 mg/kg IV) every three weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV) every two weeks and continued for up to 96 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 12 weeks by RECIST version 1.1. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response, stable disease at 12 weeks). Results: Six patients with adrenocortical carcinoma were enrolled and received treatment. Two patients (33%) have an ongoing partial response (10 and 25 months +) and two patients (33%) stable disease leading to a disease control rate of 66%. Both responders had tumors with a microsatellite instable phenotype. One patient rapidly progressed shortly after enrollment into the trial and did not undergo restaging. Immunotherapy-related toxicity was reported in all patients, with four patients (67%) experiencing grade 3/4 hepatitis leading to discontinuation of treatment. Conclusions: This is the first treatment experience using ipilimumab and nivolumab combination immunotherapy in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. Durable responses have been observed in a subset of patients suggesting that this treatment regimen should be further investigated in this patient population.

Myocarditis in Cynomolgus Monkeys Following Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD1, PDL1, or CTLA4 are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAE) in multiple organ systems including myocarditis. The pathogenesis and early diagnostic markers for ICI-induced myocarditis are poorly understood, and there is currently a lack of laboratory animal model to enhance our understanding. We aimed to develop such a model using cynomolgus monkeys. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chinese-origin cynomolgus monkeys were dosed intravenously with vehicle or nivolumab 20 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 15 mg/kg once weekly and euthanized on day 29. RESULTS: Multiple organ toxicities were observed in cynomolgus monkeys, and were characterized by loose feces, lymphadenopathy, and mononuclear cell infiltrations of varying severity in heart, colon, kidneys, liver, salivary glands, and endocrine organs. Increased proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes as well as an increase in activated T cells and central memory T cells in the blood, spleen, and lymph nodes, were observed. Transcriptomic analysis suggested increased migration and activation of T cells and increased phagocytosis and antigen presentation in the heart. Mononuclear cell infiltration in myocardium was comprised primarily of T cells, with lower numbers of macrophages and occasional B cells, and was associated with minimal cardiomyocyte degeneration as well as increases in cardiac troponin-I and NT-pro-BNP. Morphologically, cardiac lesions in our monkey model are similar to the reported ICI myocarditis in humans. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a monkey model characterized by multiple organ toxicities including myocarditis. This model may provide insight into the immune mechanisms and facilitate biomarker identification for ICI-associated irAEs.

Immune checkpoint blockade toxicity among patients with cancer presenting to the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the prevalence of patients with cancer presenting to the emergency department (ED) who are undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy; report their chief complaints; describe and estimate the prevalence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). METHODS: Four abstractors reviewed the medical records of patients with cancer treated with ICB who presented to an ED in Paris, France between January 2012 and June 2017. Chief complaints, underlying malignancy and ICB characteristics, and the final diagnoses according to the emergency physician were recorded. Abstractors noted if an emergency physician identified that a patient was receiving an ICB and if the emergency physician considered the possibility of an IRAE. The gold standard as to whether an IRAE was the cause was the patients' referring oncologist's opinion that the ED symptoms were attributed to ICB and IRAE according to post-ED medical records. Descriptive statistics were reported. RESULTS: Among the 409 patients treated with ICB at our institution, 139 presented to the ED. Chief complaints were fatigue (25.2%), fever (23%), vomiting (13.7%), diarrhoea (13.7%), dyspnoea (12.2%), abdominal pain (11.5%), confusion (8.6%) and headache (7.9%). Symptoms were due to IRAEs in 20 (14.4%) cases. The most frequent IRAEs were colitis (40%), endocrine toxicity (30%), hepatitis (25%) and pulmonary toxicity (5%). Patients with IRAEs compared with those without them more frequently had melanoma; had received more distinct courses of ICB treatment, an increased number of ICB medications and ICB cycles; and had a shorter time course since the last infusion of ICB. Emergency physicians considered the possibility of an IRAE in 24 (17.3%) of cases and diagnosed IRAE in 10 (50%) of those with later confirmed IRAE. IRAE was more likely to be missed when the referring oncologist was not contacted or when the patient had respiratory symptoms, fatigue or fever. CONCLUSIONS: ICB exposes patients to potentially severe IRAEs. Emergency physicians must identify patients treated with ICB and consider their toxicity when patients present to the ED with symptoms compatible with IRAEs.