Examination of the Igls Criteria for Defining Functional Outcomes of ß-cell Replacement Therapy: IPITA Symposium Report.

CONTEXT: The Igls criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition for outcomes of ß-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes during a January 2017 workshop sponsored by the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) and the European Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association. In July 2019, a symposium at the 17th IPITA World Congress was held to examine the Igls criteria after 2 years in clinical practice, including validation against continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose targets, and to propose future refinements that would allow for comparison of outcomes with artificial pancreas system approaches. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Utilization of the criteria in various clinical and research settings was illustrated by population as well as individual outcome data of 4 islet and/or pancreas transplant centers. Validation against CGM metrics was conducted in 55 islet transplant recipients followed-up to 10 years from a fifth center. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The Igls criteria provided meaningful clinical assessment on an individual patient and treatment group level, allowing for comparison both within and between different ß-cell replacement modalities. Important limitations include the need to account for changes in insulin requirements and C-peptide levels relative to baseline. In islet transplant recipients, CGM glucose time in range improved with each category of increasing ß-cell graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Future Igls 2.0 criteria should consider absolute rather than relative levels of insulin use and C-peptide as qualifiers with treatment success based on glucose assessment using CGM metrics on par with assessment of glycated hemoglobin and severe hypoglycemia events.

Islets Transplantation at a Crossroads - Need for Urgent Regulatory Update in the United States: Perspective Presented During the Scientific Sessions 2021 at the American Diabetes Association Congress.

Clinical islet allotransplantation has been successfully regulated as tissue/organ for transplantation in number of countries and is recognized as a safe and efficacious therapy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, in the United States, the FDA considers pancreatic islets as a biologic drug, and islet transplantation has not yet shifted from the experimental to the clinical arena for last 20 years. In order to transplant islets, the FDA requires a valid Biological License Application (BLA) in place. The BLA process is costly and lengthy. However, despite the application of drug manufacturing technology and regulations, the final islet product sterility and potency cannot be confirmed, even when islets meet all the predetermined release criteria. Therefore, further regulation of islets as drugs is obsolete and will continue to hinder clinical application of islet transplantation in the US. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network together with the United Network for Organ Sharing have developed separately from the FDA and BLA regulatory framework for human organs under the Human Resources & Services Administration to assure safety and efficacy of transplantation. Based on similar biologic characteristics of islets and human organs, we propose inclusion of islets into the existing regulatory framework for organs for transplantation, along with continued FDA oversight for islet processing, as it is for other cell/tissue products exempt from BLA. This approach would reassure islet quality, efficacy and access for Americans with diabetes to this effective procedure.

Heterogeneity of Human Pancreatic Islet Isolation Around Europe: Results of a Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Europe is currently the most active region in the field of pancreatic islet transplantation, and many of the leading groups are actually achieving similar good outcomes. Further collaborative advances in the field require the standardization of islet cell product isolation processes, and this work aimed to identify differences in the human pancreatic islet isolation processes within European countries. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire about critical steps, including donor selection, pancreas processing, pancreas perfusion and digestion, islet counting and culture, islet quality evaluation, microbiological evaluation, and release criteria of the product, was completed by isolation facilities participating at the Ninth International European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) Workshop on Islet-Beta Cell Replacement in Milan. RESULTS: Eleven islet isolation facilities completed the questionnaire. The facilities reported 445 and 53 islet isolations per year over the last 3 years from deceased organ donors and pancreatectomized patients, respectively. This activity resulted in 120 and 40 infusions per year in allograft and autograft recipients, respectively. Differences among facilities emerged in donor selection (age, cold ischemia time, intensive care unit length, amylase concentration), pancreas procurement, isolation procedures (brand and concentration of collagenase, additive, maximum acceptable digestion time), quality evaluation, and release criteria for transplantation (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests, islet numbers, and purity). Moreover, even when a high concordance about the relevance of one parameter was evident, thresholds for the acceptance were different among facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The result highlighted the presence of a heterogeneity in the islet cell product process and product release criteria.

Defining Outcomes for ß-cell Replacement Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetes: A Consensus Report on the Igls Criteria From the IPITA/EPITA Opinion Leaders Workshop.

ß-cell replacement therapy, available currently as pancreas or islet transplantation, has developed without a clear definition of graft functional and clinical outcomes. The International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association and European Pancreas and Islet Transplantation Association held a workshop to develop consensus for an International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association and European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Statement on the definition of function and failure of current and future forms of ß-cell replacement therapy. There was consensus that ß-cell replacement therapy could be considered as a treatment for ß-cell failure, regardless of etiology and without requiring undetectable C-peptide, accompanied by glycemic instability with either problematic hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Glycemic control should be assessed at a minimum by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. Optimal ß-cell graft function is defined by near-normal glycemic control (HbA1c ≤6.5% [48 mmol/mol]) without severe hypoglycemia or requirement for insulin or other antihyperglycemic therapy, and with an increase over pretransplant measurement of C-peptide. Good ß-cell graft function requires HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia and with a significant (>50%) reduction in insulin requirements and restoration of clinically significant C-peptide production. Marginal ß-cell graft function is defined by failure to achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), the occurrence of any severe hypoglycemia, or less than 50% reduction in insulin requirements when there is restoration of clinically significant C-peptide production documented by improvement in hypoglycemia awareness/severity, or glycemic variability/lability. A failed ß-cell graft is defined by the absence of any evidence for clinically significant C-peptide production. Optimal and good function are considered successful clinical outcomes.

Defining outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy: a work in progress.

Defined outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes are critically needed. Progress towards the clinical acceptance of pancreas and islet transplantation has been hampered by the lack of clear definitions of functional and efficacy outcomes, as well as a lack of consistently applied glycaemic control metrics, together with poor alignment with the field of artificial insulin delivery/artificial pancreas development. To address this problem, the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) collaborated with the European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) to develop a consensus for a joint statement on the definition of function and failure of beta cell replacement therapies, which is summarised in this commentary.

Effect of Manufacturing Procedures on Human Islet Isolation From Donor Pancreata Standardized by the North American Islet Donor Score.

This study investigates manufacturing procedures that affect islet isolation outcomes from donor pancreata standardized by the North American Islet Donor Score (NAIDS). Islet isolations performed at the University of Illinois, Chicago, from pancreata with NAIDS ≥65 were investigated. The research cohort was categorized into two groups based on a postpurification yield either greater than (group A) or less than (group B) 400,000 IEQ. Associations between manufacturing procedures and islet isolation outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic or linear regressions. A total of 119 cases were retrieved from 630 islet isolations performed since 2003. Group A is composed of 40 cases with an average postpurified yield of 570,098 IEQ, whereas group B comprised 79 cases with an average yield of 235,987 IEQ. One third of 119 cases were considered successful islet isolations that yielded >400,000 IEQ. The prepurified and postpurified islet product outcome parameters were detailed for future reference. The NAIDS (>80 vs. 65-80) [odds ratio (OR): 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-6.70], cold ischemic time (≤10 vs. >10 h) (OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.61-8.39), and enzyme perfusion method (mechanical vs. manual) (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.01-5.56) were independent determinants for postpurified islet yield ≥400,000 IEQ. The NAIDS (>80, p < 0.001), cold ischemic time (≤10 h, p < 0.05), increased unit of collagenase (p < 0.01), and pancreatic duct cannulation time (<30 min, p < 0.01) all independently correlated with better islet quantity parameters. Furthermore, cold ischemic time (≤10 h, p < 0.05), liberase MTF (p < 0.001), increased unit of collagenase (p < 0.05), duct cannulation time (<30 min, p < 0.05), and mechanical enzyme perfusion (p < 0.05) were independently associated with better islet morphology score. Analysis of islet manufacturing procedures from the pancreata with standardized quality is essential in identifying technical issues within islet isolation. Adequate processing duration in each step of islet isolation, using liberase MTF, and mechanical enzyme perfusion all affect isolation outcomes.

Cost effectiveness and value of information analyses of islet cell transplantation in the management of 'unstable' type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Islet cell transplantation is a method to stabilize type 1 diabetes patients with hypoglycemia unawareness and unstable blood glucose levels by reducing insulin dependency and protecting against severe hypoglycemia through restoring endogenous insulin secretion. This study analyses the current cost-effectiveness of this technology and estimates the value of further research to reduce uncertainty around cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov cohort model with a mean patient age of 49 to simulate costs and health outcomes over a life-time horizon. Our analysis used intensive insulin therapy (IIT) as comparator and took the provincial healthcare provider perspective. Cost and effectiveness data for up to four transplantations per patient came from the University of Alberta hospital. Costs are expressed in 2012 Canadian dollars and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life years. To characterize the uncertainty around expected outcomes, we carried out a probabilistic sensitivity analysis within the Bayesian decision-analytic framework. We performed a value-of-information analysis to identify priority areas for future research under various scenarios. We applied a structural sensitivity analysis to assess the dependence of outcomes on model characteristics. RESULTS: Compared to IIT, islet cell transplantation using non-generic (generic) immunosuppression had additional costs of $150,006 ($112,023) per additional QALY, an average gain of 3.3 life years, and a probability of being cost-effective of 0.5 % (28.3 %) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. At this threshold the non-generic technology has an expected value of perfect information (EVPI) of $260,744 for Alberta. This increases substantially in cost-reduction scenarios. The research areas with the highest partial EVPI are costs, followed by natural history, and effectiveness and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Current transplantation technology provides substantial improvements in health outcomes over conventional therapy for highly selected patients with 'unstable' type 1 diabetes. However, it is much more costly and so is not cost-effective. The value of further research into the cost-effectiveness is dependent upon treatment costs. Further, we suggest the value of information should not only be derived from current data alone when knowing that this data will most likely change in the future.

Islet Transplantation in Pediatric Patients: Current Indications and Future Perspectives.

The first islet transplantation in diabetes mellitus was performed more than 20 years ago. Since then, clinical results have progressively improved. Nowadays, islet transplantation can be considered a real therapeutic option after pancreatectomy for painful chronic pancreatitis (autotransplantation) and in selected adult patients affected by type 1 diabetes mellitus (allotransplantation). Better results are mainly due to the advances in the standardization of islet isolation and purification procedures as well as in the pharmacological treatment of recipients. Anti-inflammatory treatments facilitate islet engraftment and prevent metabolic exhaustion and functional ß-cell apoptosis; new strategies better control islet graft rejection. As a consequence, islet transplantation activities are no longer confined to few centers only, rather thousands of transplants are now performed all over the world. Many attempts are actually undertaken to find solutions to current problems of islets transplantation, from toxicity of immunosuppressive therapy to the limited engraftment, function and duration. There is general hope that these procedures will offer a safe and feasible therapeutic option for an increasing number of patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, including pediatric patients.

THERAPY OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes: so close and yet so far away.

Over the past decades, tremendous efforts have been made to establish pancreatic islet transplantation as a standard therapy for type 1 diabetes. Recent advances in islet transplantation have resulted in steady improvements in the 5-year insulin independence rates for diabetic patients. Here we review the key challenges encountered in the islet transplantation field which include islet source limitation, sub-optimal engraftment of islets, lack of oxygen and blood supply for transplanted islets, and immune rejection of islets. Additionally, we discuss possible solutions for these challenges.

Clinical implementation of islet transplantation: A current assessment.

Beta-cell replacement is the only physiologically relevant alternative to insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Pancreas and islet transplantation from deceased organ donors can provide a new beta-cell pool to produce insulin, help blood glucose management, and delay secondary diabetes complications. For children and adolescents with T1D, whole pancreas transplantation is not a viable option because of surgical complications, whereas islet transplantation, even if it is procedurally simpler, must still overcome the burden of immunosuppression to become a routine therapy for children in the future.

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney diseases workshop.

A workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases focused on research gaps and opportunities in total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) for the management of chronic pancreatitis (CP). The session was held on July 23, 2014, and structured into 5 sessions: (1) patient selection, indications, and timing; (2) technical aspects of TPIAT; (3) improving success of islet autotransplantation; (4) improving outcomes after total pancreatectomy; and (5) registry considerations for TPIAT. The current state of knowledge was reviewed; knowledge gaps and research needs were specifically highlighted. Common themes included the need to identify which patients best benefit from and when to intervene with TPIAT, current limitations of the surgical procedure, diabetes remission and the potential for improvement, opportunities to better address pain remission, gastrointestinal complications in this population, and unique features of children with CP considered for TPIAT. The need for a multicenter patient registry that specifically addresses the complexities of CP and total pancreatectomy outcomes as well as postsurgical diabetes outcomes was repeatedly emphasized.

Partial hepatectomy improves the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation by promoting revascularization.

Revascularization of grafts is one of the important key factors for the success of islet transplantation. After partial hepatectomy, many growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are increased in the remnant liver. These growth factors have properties that promote angiogenesis. This might be an optimal environment for revascularization of islets transplanted intraportally. To verify this hypothesis, syngeneic islets (330 per recipient) were transplanted into the right hepatic lobes of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Balb/c mice with (hepatectomy group) or without (control group) left liver resection. Blood glucose was monitored for 28 d after transplantation. Glucose tolerance test was performed on post-operative day (POD) 30, and histological assessments were performed on POD 7 and 30 respectively. Analysis revealed that 36.7% of the control and 90.0% of the hepatectomy mice attained normoglycemia during the observation period (*p = 0.0142). Glucose tolerance was improved in the hepatectomy group (Area under the curve of intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests on POD 30, Control; 47,700 ± 5,890 min*mg/dl, Hepatectomy; 26,000 ± 2,060 min*mg/dl: **p = 0.00314). Revascularization of grafted islets was more pronounced in the hepatectomy group (Vessel number per islet area on POD 7, Control; 3.20 ± 0.463 × 10 (-4) /µm ( 2) , Hepatectomy; 7.08 ± 0.513 × 10 (-4) /µm ( 2) : **p < 0.01). In the present study, partial hepatectomy (30%) improved the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation. Revascularization of islets transplanted into the liver may have been promoted by the induction of liver regeneration.

Transplanted functional islet mass: donor, islet preparation, and recipient factors influence early graft function in islet-after-kidney patients.

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict clinical function of a specific islet batch released for clinical transplantation using standardized variables remains an elusive goal. METHODS: Analysis of 10 donor, 7 islet isolation, 3 quality control, and 6 recipient variables was undertaken in 110 islet-after-kidney transplants and correlated to the pre- to 28-day posttransplant change in C-peptide to glucose and creatinine ratio (ΔCP/GCr). RESULTS: Univariate analysis yielded islet volume transplanted (Spearman r=0.360, P<0.001) and increment of insulin secretion (r=0.377, P<0.001) as variables positively associated to ΔCP/GCr. A negative association to ΔCP/GCr was cold ischemia time (r=-0.330, P<0.001). A linear, backward-selection multiple regression was used to obtain a model for the transplanted functional islet mass (TFIM). The TFIM model, composed of islet volume transplanted, increment of insulin secretion, cold ischemia time, and exocrine tissue volume transplanted, accounted for 43% of the variance of the clinical outcome in the islet-after-kidney data set. CONCLUSION: The TFIM provides a straightforward and potent tool to guide the decision to use a specific islet preparation for clinical transplantation.

Coagulation abnormalities in deceased donors are associated with unsuccessful human islet cell isolation.

An equivalent islet number (EIN) greater than 300,000 is necessary for islet cell transplantation for a recipient who weighs about 60 kg. The aim of this study is to identify factors that affect isolation outcome. The most significant independent predictor for successful islet isolation from deceased donors was low international normalized ratio (INR).

Usefulness of the secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index for evaluation of clinical autologous islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the engrafted islet mass is important in evaluating the efficacy of islet transplantation. We previously demonstrated that the average secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index within 1 month of allogeneic islet transplantation was an excellent predictor of insulin independence. However, the usefulness of the SUITO index for evaluating autologous islet transplantation has not been explored. The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship between the SUITO index and clinical outcomes after total pancreatectomy followed by autologous islet transplantation. METHODS: We performed 27 total pancreatectomies followed by autologous islet transplantation from October 2006 to January 2011. Cases were divided into an insulin-independent group (IIG; n = 12) and an insulin-dependent group (lDG; n = 15). The SUITO index was calculated by the formula [fasting C-peptide (ng/mL)/fasting glucose (mg/dL) -63] × 1,500. The average SUITO index within the first month of transplantation except for days 0, 1, and 2, maximum SUITO index, and most recent SUITO index were calculated in each case, and values were compared between the IIG and the IDG. RESULTS: The average SUITO index within 1 month was significantly higher in the IIG than in the IDG (24.6 ± 3.4 vs 14.9 ± 2.0, respectively; P < .02). The maximum SUITO indices were 45.7 ± 7.7 in the IIG and 30.1 ± 8.1 in the IDG (not significant), and the recent SUITO indices were 36.9 ± 6.7 in the IIG and 22.8 ± 6.1 in the IDG (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The average SUITO index within 1 month was an excellent predictor of insulin independence after total pancreatectomy followed by autologous islet transplantation.

Association between the secretory unit of islet transplant objects index and satisfaction with insulin therapy among insulin-dependent islet recipients.

INTRODUCTION: When patients do not become insulin independent after islet cell transplantation (ICT), another aim is to eliminate severe hypoglycemia. Previously we reported that a secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index score >10 was associated with a reduction of severe hypoglycemia. In this study, we assessed patients' satisfaction with their insulin therapy based on the SUITO index. METHODS: The study involved 11 islet recipients with type 1 diabetes who underwent ICT but still used insulin. From those patients, 41 Insulin Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaires (ITSQ) were collected. The SUITO index (fasting C-peptide [ng/mL] × 1500/blood glucose [mg/dL] - 63) was calculated at the same outpatient visits that the survey was administered. ITSQ scores were summarized using subscales and compared among 3 groups: the pre-ICT group, the low-SUITO group (SUITO index score <10 post-ICT), and the high-SUITO group (SUITO index score ≥10). Higher survey scores indicated better satisfaction. RESULTS: Significant trend relationships across the 3 groups were observed in the ITSQ total score (P = .02 with Jonckheere-Terpstra test) and subscale scores of glycemic control (P < .001), hypoglycemic control (P = .01), and inconvenience of regimen (P = .004). The pairwise comparisons between the 3 groups found significant differences: high SUITO versus both pre-ICT and low SUITO for the total ITSQ score (P = .03 and .005, respectively) and glycemic control score (P = .008 and .001, respectively), and high SUITO versus low SUITO for hypoglycemic control score (P = .04) and inconvenience of regimen score (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Islet recipients with a SUITO index ≥10 experienced higher satisfaction with insulin injection therapy compared with the pre-ICT group, even though they were insulin dependent. A SUITO index ≥10 is a reasonable benchmark for successful ICT.

Microbiological safety of porcine islets: comparison with source pig.

BACKGROUND: Pig islet donors intended for clinical xenotransplantation for the treatment of diabetes must meet stringent conditions. Among others, viruses with the potential to cross the species barrier should be excluded from the herd: this list includes encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), hepatitis E virus (HEV), porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) and porcine γ-lymphotropic herpesvirus (PLHV). As an islet product is isolated from the pancreas and then subjected to culture before implantation, the question is raised whether islets could be negative even if the animal itself is positive for a distinct pathogen. METHODS: To answer this question, sensitive quantitative real-time PCR assays were established for EMCV, HEV, PCMV and PLHV. Twelve adult animals from a high-hygienic herd were then evaluated; testing tissues, where the virus is expected to reside in latent infection, testing islets immediately after isolation, and then isolated islets after a 7-day culture. RESULTS: None of the tissues tested positive for EMCV, HEV or PLHV. PCMV was observed in spleen tissue from six animals: three of these six animals were positive for isolated islets, and two of these three cases were also positive for islets after culture. Older animals in particular showed positivity, and within a given litter not all animals were PCMV positive. CONCLUSIONS: These data fit with spread through the herd by horizontal transmission, not in utero infection. PCMV has to be excluded from the herd to ensure that islets for transplantation are negative for PCMV.

Quantification of the islet product: presentation of a standardized current good manufacturing practices compliant system with minimal variability.

BACKGROUND: Accurate islet quantification has proven difficult to standardize in a good manufacturing practices (GMP) approved manner. METHODS: The influence of assessment variables from both manual and computer-assisted digital image analysis (DIA) methods were compared using calibrated, standardized microspheres or islets alone. Additionally, a mixture of microspheres and exocrine tissue was used to evaluate the variability of both the current, internationally recognized, manual method and a novel GMP-friendly purity- and volume-based method (PV) evaluated by DIA in a semiclosed, culture bag system. RESULTS: Computer-assisted DIA recorded known microsphere size distribution and quantities accurately. By using DIA to evaluate islets, the interindividual manually evaluated percent coefficients of variation (CV%; n=14) were reduced by almost half for both islet equivalents (IEs; 31% vs. 17%, P=0.002) and purity (20% vs. 13%, P=0.033). The microsphere pool mixed with exocrine tissue did not differ from expected IE with either method. However, manual IE resulted in a total CV% of 44.3% and a range spanning 258 k IE, whereas PV resulted in CV% of 10.7% and range of 60 k IE. Purity CV% for each method were similar approximating 10.5% and differed from expected by +7% for the manual method and +3% for PV. CONCLUSION: The variability of standard counting methods for islet samples and clinical quantities of microspheres mixed with exocrine tissue were reduced with DIA. They were reduced even further by use of a semiclosed bag system compared with standard manual counting, thereby facilitating the standardization of islet evaluation according to GMP standards.