An analysis of outcomes and treatment costs for children undergoing splenectomy for chronic immune thrombocytopenia purpura.

PURPOSE: Indications and timing for splenectomy in pediatric chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (cITP) are controversial because of high spontaneous remission rates and concern for overwhelming postsplenectomy infection. The objective of this study was to assess the risks, costs, and benefits of medical and surgical intervention for children with cITP. METHODS: After receiving institutional review board approval, medical records for all children with cITP who underwent splenectomy from 2002 through 2009 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 22). Preoperative and postoperative data were collected. Medical and surgical costs were calculated based on pharmacy charges per dose and hospital charges, respectively. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 11 years (range, 3-16 years). Medical management included steroids (n = 21), intravenous gamma globulin (n = 19), anti-D antibody (n = 19), or a combination of these therapies (n = 22). Nineteen patients (86%) reported side effects from medical therapy. Median age at splenectomy was 13 years (range, 6-18 years), and time to surgery was 23 months from diagnosis (range, 6-104 months). Splenectomy increased platelet counts in all children from a median of 25,500 to 380,000 postoperatively (P < .0001). One child experienced overwhelming postsplenectomy infection after a dog bite (n = 1). At the last follow-up (15 months; range, 1-79 months), 19 patients (86%) were asymptomatic with platelet counts greater than 50,000. Of the 3 children with persistent thrombocytopenia, 2 were diagnosed with secondary cITP. Median cost of splenectomy was significantly less than the cost of medical therapy ($20,803 vs $146,284; P < .0002). CONCLUSION: Earlier surgical consultation for children with cITP may be justified given the high success rate and low morbidity, particularly given the significant complication rate and cost of continued medical treatment.

Management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children: potential role of novel agents.

The treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in children is controversial, requiring individualized assessment of the patient and consideration of treatment options. If the platelet count is >10 000/µL and the patient is asymptomatic, a 'watch and wait' strategy is appropriate since most children with ITP will recover completely without pharmacotherapy. If therapy is indicated because of bleeding or a platelet count <10 000/µL, then treatment with glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), or anti-D are possible initial choices. Glucocorticoid treatment is the least expensive and is our usual first choice of therapy. Its use assumes that the blood counts and blood film have been evaluated to ensure the absence of evidence of alternative diagnoses, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or incipient acute leukemia. IVIg is expensive and often causes severe headache, nausea and vomiting, and requires hospitalization at our institution. Anti-D therapy is also expensive and can only be used in patients who are Rhesus D positive. These therapies, even if only transiently effective, can be repeated if necessary. Children usually recover from newly diagnosed ITP, with or without multiple courses of medical therapy. If the disease becomes 'persistent' with severe thrombocytopenia and/or bleeding, and is no longer responsive to the three first-line therapies, the next approach includes the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists or rituximab. When the disease persists for more than 1 year, it is considered chronic, and, if symptomatic, it may become necessary to consider third-line therapies, including splenectomy, alternative immunosuppressive agents, or combination or investigative chemoimmunotherapy. This review considers the indications, mechanism of action, and effectiveness of the traditional and novel treatment options for patients with ITP.

Relevance of new recommendations on routine antenatal prevention of rhesus immunization: an appraisal based on a retrospective analysis of all cases observed in two French administrative areas of 3 million inhabitants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential impact of new guidelines recommending routine antenatal prophylaxis at 28 weeks of pregnancy on incidence, consequences and cost of rhesus immunization. STUDY DESIGN: All rhesus immunizations of 224,500 ongoing pregnancies in two neighbouring administrative areas in France between 2000 and 2006 were enrolled in this retrospective study. To determine the aetiology of immunization and to specify when sensitization occurred, we searched sensitizing events between the last negative and the first positive red-cell antibody test results. Perinatal consequences and costing were also analyzed. RESULTS: From 138 rhesus negative women bearing anti-D antibodies, none had received routine prophylaxis at 28 weeks. 37% were primary immunizations and 63% were reactivating former immunization. 63% sensitizations occurred after unprovoked foetal-maternal haemorrhage, mostly after 28 weeks (54%). Twenty-five (18.1%) sensitizations resulted from inappropriate management of existing prophylaxis. Immigrants with previously acquired antibodies accounted for 10% of cases. There was no foetal demise and none born before 28 weeks among our 140 babies. Only 25% required intensive care, mostly those born to mothers reactivating immunization, with an overall good perinatal outcome. Systematic 28-week prophylaxis would have cost about euro 2.5 million to reduce overall cost of immunizations by euro 0.6 million. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rhesus immunization in our population was low at 0.41 per thousand. Routine antenatal prophylaxis could have avoided 54% of these immunizations but expected perinatal benefits are low, as newborns with the worst issue were born to mothers with unavoidable immunizations. Therefore the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is doubtful.

Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To identify any evidence for advances in the use of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) since the 2002 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) appraisal, and to assess the current clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of RAADP for Rhesus D (RhD)-negative women. DATA SOURCES: Main bibliographic databases were searched from inception to July 2007. REVIEW METHODS: Selected studies were assessed and data extracted using a standard template and quality assessment based on published criteria. Meta-analysis was used where appropriate, otherwise outcomes were tabulated and discussed within a descriptive synthesis. The health economic model developed for the 2002 NICE appraisal of RAADP was modified to assess the cost-effectiveness of different regimens of RAADP. RESULTS: The clinical effectiveness searches identified 670 potentially relevant articles. Of these, 12 papers were included in the review, relating to eight studies of clinical effectiveness. With one exception, no additional studies were identified in comparison with the previous assessment report, and some of the studies of clinical effectiveness included in the 2002 review had to be excluded because they did not use currently licensed doses. Therefore, eight studies comparing RAADP with no prophylaxis were identified in the clinical effectiveness review and nine (including the 2001 assessment report itself) in the cost-effectiveness review. The clinical efficacy studies were generally of poor quality and did not provide a basis for differentiating between regimens of RAADP. The best indication of the likely efficacy of a programme of RAADP comes from two non-randomised community-based studies. The pooled results of these suggest that such a programme may reduce the sensitisation rate from 0.95% (95% CI 0.18-1.71) to 0.35% (95% CI 0.29-0.40). This gives an odds ratio for the risk of sensitisation of 0.37 (95% CI 0.21-0.65) and an absolute reduction in risk of sensitisation in RhD-negative mothers at risk (i.e. carrying a RhD-positive child) of 0.6%. The identified studies suggest that RAADP has minimal adverse effects. Of the nine studies in the cost-effectiveness review, only two described a model that could be applicable to the NHS. The economic model modified from the 2002 appraisal suggests that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of RAADP given to RhD-negative primigravidae versus no treatment is between 9000 pounds and 15,000 pounds, and for RAADP given to all RhD-negative women rather than to RhD-negative primigravidae only is between 20,000 pounds and 35,000 pounds depending upon the regimen. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the results are reasonably robust to changes in the assumptions within the model. CONCLUSIONS: RAADP reduces the incidence of sensitisation and hence of haemolytic disease of the newborn. The economic model suggests that RAADP given to all RhD-negative pregnant women is likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of around 30,000 pounds per QALY gained. The total cost of providing RAADP to RhD-negative primigravidae in England and Wales is estimated to be around 1.8-3.1 million pounds per year, depending upon regimen, and to all RhD-negative pregnant women in England and Wales around 2-3.5 million pounds.

A cost-utility analysis of treatment for acute childhood idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

BACKGROUND: The primary objective in the treatment of acute pediatric idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is to rapidly increase the platelet count. METHODS: We built a decision analytic model to evaluate the cost-utility of four commonly used treatment strategies: intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) 0.8 g/kg, anti-D 75 mcg/kg, methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg for 3 days), and prednisone (4 mg/kg/day for 4 days). In our baseline model, all children were hospitalized upon presentation, and discharged once the platelet count reached > or =20,000. We performed a literature search to estimate time to platelet count > or =20,000 for each strategy, as well as the probability of side effects. We obtained cost data and quality of life measures from institutional and published data sources. RESULTS: Total cost of one-time treatment for a 20 kg child was US dollars 786 with prednisone, US dollars 1,346 with methylprednisolone, US dollars 2,035 with anti-D, and US dollars 2,492 with IVIG. The strategies of IVIG and methylprednisolone were less effective and more expensive than anti-D and prednisone, respectively. Although anti-D caused the most rapid rise in platelet counts, the incremental cost-utility ratio (costs incurred by using anti-D instead of prednisone divided by health benefit of using anti-D instead of prednisone) was US dollars 7,616 per day of severe thrombocytopenia avoided, primarily due to the much higher medication cost of anti-D. Utilizing an outpatient model, the cost difference between anti-D and prednisone was even more striking. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefit of anti-D is offset by a substantial cost increase. Although often overlooked in favor of newer agents, a brief course of high-dose prednisone is an inexpensive and effective treatment for acute ITP.

The potential for treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with anti-D to prevent splenectomy: a predictive cost analysis.

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder affecting both children and adults that can be manifested by severe bleeding episodes. Adult ITP patients have a low rate of spontaneous remission, and symptomatic patients commonly undergo splenectomy; however, maintenance therapy may increase the rate of remission, allowing splenectomy to be avoided. Anti-D is a recently licensed treatment for ITP that has the potential to delay, and possibly avoid, the need for splenectomy. We used preliminary data from an ongoing clinical trial to evaluate the costs involved in using anti-D therapy for 1 year with the intent of avoiding the need for splenectomy. We accounted for different possible outcomes at the completion of the clinical trial. An economic model with a theoretical cohort of 100 patients was developed using the model of an ongoing clinical trial. The average wholesale price was used to determine the cost of an infusion of anti-D based on an average dose ($1,213 per infusion). The cost of splenectomy was determined by a literature review ($16,000). Costs were calculated for all known patient outcomes; where outcomes were unknown and likely to vary, all possible outcomes were accounted for (splenectomy or no splenectomy). In our theoretical cohort, 31 of 100 patients were taken off anti-D and received splenectomy, 32 of 100 were stable after receiving anti-D and would not need splenectomy, and 37 of 100 had Indeterminate outcomes after receiving anti-D. When compared with the cost of the hypothetical scenario of initially giving all 100 patients splenectomy ($1.6 million), a minimum of 47 patients would have to avoid splenectomy to result in a cost savings for our cohort of 100 patients. The group of 47 patients avoiding splenectomy would be composed of the 32 patients comprising the stable group and at least 15 of the 37 patients comprising the group with indeterminate outcomes. If all 37 of the patients in the group with indeterminate outcomes avoid splenectomy, $363,000 and 69 spleens would be saved. Our data suggest that in the phase III trial of maintenance anti-D therapy versus immediate splenectomy, anti-D therapy will be a cost-effective option if 47% or more of patients avoid splenectomy.