Adjunctive Raloxifene and Isradipine Improve Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is the most important feature of schizophrenia leading to severe functional disability. To identify pathways that improve pathophysiological neurocognition in schizophrenia is a current challenge for the development of goal-directed clinical interventions. In the present study, we investigated the effects of raloxifene (a selective estrogen modulator) and isradipine (a voltage-gated L-type calcium channel blocker) on cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia. METHOD: We designed a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. We randomized 60 patients with schizophrenia into 3 groups including isradipine 5 mg, raloxifine 60 mg, and placebo for 6 consequent weeks, all in the same shape capsules, 2 times a day, along with treatment as usual. The initial and final results of blood tests, electrocardiograms, and cognitive tests in specific domains, such as attention, processing speed, executive function, and verbal memory were evaluated. RESULTS: Our findings revealed a remarkable association between adjunctive raloxifene treatment and the alleviation of verbal memory deficits. Isradipine treatment significantly improved the verbal memory and attention dysfunction in some variables of the Stroop test, compared with the placebo. However, no effect was observed in processing speed and executive function deficits. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence that isradipine is a novel therapy option improving verbal memory and attention, both related to its activity in the hippocampus and the cerebellum. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of action for both drugs in schizophrenia.

Calcium antagonists for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The sudden loss of blood supply in ischemic stroke is associated with an increase of calcium ions within neurons. Inhibiting this increase could protect neurons and might reduce neurological impairment, disability, and handicap after stroke. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of calcium antagonists for reducing the risk of death or dependency after acute ischemic stroke. We investigated the influence of different drugs, dosages, routes of administration, time intervals after stroke, and trial design on the outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: The evidence is current to 6 February 2018. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (6 February 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1950 to 6 February 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 6 February 2018), and four Chinese databases (6 February 2018): Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM-disc), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Periodical Database of VIP information, and Wanfang Data. We also searched the following trials registers: ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, Stroke Trials Registry, ISRCTN registry, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and we contacted trialists and researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing a calcium antagonist versus control in people with acute ischemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. We used death or dependency at the end of long-term follow-up (at least three months) in activities of daily living as the primary outcome. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: We included 34 trials involving 7731 participants. All the participants were in the acute stage of ischemic stroke, and their age ranged from 18 to 85 years, with the average age ranging from 52.3 to 74.6 years across different trials. There were more men than women in most trials. Twenty-six trials tested nimodipine, and three trials assessed flunarizine. One trial each used isradipine, nicardipine, PY108-608, fasudil, and lifarizine. More than half of these trials followed participants for at least three months. Calcium antagonists showed no effects on the primary outcome (risk ratio (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.13; 22 trials; 22 studies; 6684 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or on death at the end of follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.17; 31 trials; 7483 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Thirteen trials reported adverse events, finding no significant differences between groups. Most trials did not report the allocation process or how they managed missing data, so we considered these at high risk of selection and attrition bias. Most trials reported double-blind methods but did not state who was blinded, and none of the trial protocols were available. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the use of calcium antagonists in people with acute ischemic stroke.

Phase II safety, tolerability, and dose selection study of isradipine as a potential disease-modifying intervention in early Parkinson's disease (STEADY-PD).

Isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, has been shown to be neuroprotective in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). To establish a dosage of isradipine controlled-release (CR) that is tolerable and demonstrates preliminary efficacy for use in a future pivotal efficacy trial a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial (Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Assessment of Dynacirc CR in Parkinson Disease [STEADY-PD]) was undertaken in subjects with early PD not requiring dopaminergic therapy (dopamine agonists or levodopa) randomized 1:1:1:1 to 5, 10, or 20 mg of isradipine CR or matching placebo daily. The primary outcome was tolerability defined as no more than a 30% difference in the proportion of patients completing the study on the originally assigned dosage between an active and placebo group. If more than one isradipine dosage was tolerable, then a 3-point difference in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) change between baseline and week 52 (or time to sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy) was taken as a criterion for selection of the most desirable dosage for future study. STEADY-PD enrolled 99 subjects. The tolerability of isradipine was dose dependent: placebo, 25 of 26 patients (96%); 5 mg, 19 of 23 patients (83%); 10 mg 19 of 26 patients (73%); and 20 mg 9 of 24 patients (37%). There was no difference in change in UPDRS among dosages. The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (30) and dizziness (24). Isradipine 10 mg daily was the maximal tolerable dosage in this study of early PD. A large placebo-controlled trial will be necessary and is planned to assess efficacy of isradipine 10 mg daily to slow progression of PD disability.

Isradipine for treatment of acute hypertension in hospitalized children and adolescents.

Severe acute hypertension in pediatric patients requires prompt and controlled blood pressure (BP) reduction to prevent end-organ damage. The authors aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of isradipine, an orally administered second-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, for treatment of acute hypertension in hospitalized pediatric patients. A retrospective analysis of 391 doses of isradipine administered to 282 patients (58% boys) with acute hypertension and median age of 12.8 years (range, 0.1-21.9) was performed. Primary diagnoses included renal disease (n=154), malignancy (45), nonrenal transplant (37), neurologic disease (21), and other (25). The decrease in systolic BP was 16.3%±11.6% (mean ± SD) and diastolic BP was 24.2%±17.2%. BPs were significantly lower in all age groups and in all diagnosis categories following isradipine administration. The decrease in BP was the highest in children younger than 2 years. The mean increase in pulse after a dose was 7±17 beats per minute. Forty adverse events were reported in 33 patients, with emesis and nausea being the most common; 5 of these events were hypotension. The authors conclude that isradipine effectively reduces BP in a wide variety of hospitalized children and adolescents with acute hypertension. A lower initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg may be appropriate in children younger than 2 years.

Tolerability of isradipine in early Parkinson's disease: a pilot dose escalation study.

Recent data suggests that isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is neuroprotective in preclinical models of parkinsonism. Isradipine has not been systematically studied in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and tolerability of isradipine controlled release (CR) in patients with early PD. Qualified subjects (n = 31) received isradipine CR, titrated from 5 to 20 mg daily dose over 8 weeks as tolerated. Eighty-one percent of subjects completed the study. Tolerability of isradipine CR was dose dependent: 94% for 5 mg dose; 87% for 10 mg; 68% for 15 mg; and 52% for 20 mg. Isradipine had no significant effect on blood pressure or PD motor disability. The two most common reasons for dose reduction were leg edema (7) and dizziness (3). There was no difference in isradipine tolerability between subjects with and without dopaminergic treatment, or with and without hypertension.

Calcium antagonist isradipine-induced calcium influx through nonselective cation channels in human gingival fibroblasts.

Isradipine raises the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in human gingival fibroblasts by enhancing Ca2+ influx through the plasma membrane. To research the pathways through which Ca2+ enters the cells, we examined the interactive effects of isradipine and blockers or enhancers of nonselective cation channels (NSCCs) and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (NCXs). Normal human gingival fibroblast Gin-1 cells were used. The [Ca2+]i was measured with the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye fura-2/AM. Changes in the fluorescence intensity of fura-2 in the cells were recorded with a video-imaging analysis system. Ca2+ antagonists (nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem in the concentration range of 1 to 20 microM) other than isradipine also raised the [Ca2+]i. All of the NSCC inhibitors (SK&F 96365, GdCl3, HgCl2 and flufenamic acid), but none of the NCX inhibitors (KB-R 7943 and benzamil), significantly decreased the [Ca2+]i raised by isradipine (3 microM). Neither the Na+ ionophore monensin nor Na+/K+ ATPase inhibitor ouabain had any significant effect on the isradipine-induced [Ca2+]i rise. Taken together, our data indicate that Ca2+ entry through the NSCCs is involved in the isradipine-induced [Ca2+]i rise. The results obtained here play an important role in the development of drugs for etiologic therapy of gingival overgrowth.

Antihypertensive pharmacobezoar.

Most antihypertensive drugs have known side effects that are elicited by the careful clinician taking care of hypertensive patients. However, many antihypertensive medications utilize drug delivery systems that prolong the duration of blood pressure reduction. The gastrointestinal therapeutic system that is used with nifedipine, isradipine, and verapamil has a unique side effect. Obstruction may occur at the site of a previous surgical repair (pyloric stenosis or gastroplasty) or stenosis of the esophagus, small intestine, or colon. The same delivery system is used with methylphenidate, oxybutynin, glipizide, and doxazosin. Although this complication is rare, physicians who prescribe and care for hypertensive patients should recognize this potential problem.

Effects of repeated-dose isradipine on the abuse liability of cocaine.

Despite preclinical studies suggesting that isradipine may antagonize the abuse liability of cocaine, pretreatment with sustained-release isradipine did not reduce euphoric mood in cocaine-using volunteers. This double-blind, within-subject, crossover laboratory study determined whether maximal dose-loading with isradipine could antagonize effects of cocaine in 12 cocaine-dependent research volunteers administered intravenous cocaine doses (0, 0.325, and 0.65 mg/kg) on different days after 5 days of treatment with isradipine or placebo. Isradipine dose was 30 mg sustained release nightly plus 15 mg immediate release 2 hr before cocaine infusion. Cocaine produced dose-related increases in cocaine's subjective effects and a behavioral measure of reinforcement. Isradipine enhanced, rather than antagonized, subjective effects, indicating that isradipine does not antagonize cocaine's abuse liability in dependent research volunteers.

Effects of isradipine on methamphetamine-induced changes in attentional and perceptual-motor skills of cognition.

RATIONALE: While the effects of d-amphetamine in increasing performance have been established, there is a paucity of information on the effects of methamphetamine on cognition in drug-naive subjects, and no published information on the effects of intravenous methamphetamine administration in dependent individuals. The dihydropyridine-class calcium channel antagonist, isradipine, has been posited as a putative treatment to prevent methamphetamine-associated hypertensive crisis and its sequelae. Yet, isradipine's effects on cognitive performance in methamphetamine-dependent individuals are not known. OBJECTIVE: Since individuals whose dependence on methamphetamine is attributable to the need to enhance performance may be loath to take a cognition-impairing medication, even for the treatment of life-threatening hypertensive crisis, it would be important to determine isradipine's effects on performance. METHODS: We therefore examined in a blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover design the cognitive effects of low and high doses of intravenous methamphetamine (15 mg and 30 mg, respectively) in both the presence and absence of isradipine. RESULTS: Intravenous d-methamphetamine produced dose-dependent increases in attention, concentration, and psychomotor performance. Isradipine, both with and without methamphetamine, had a modest effect to decrease attention. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the further testing of isradipine as a medication for improving the cognitive impairments that have been associated with chronic methamphetamine use.

Safety and efficacy of therapeutically equivalent doses of sustained-release formulations of isradipine and felodipine.

This open-label, drug substitution study was conducted to determine if subjects receiving sustained-release isradipine (SR-I) can be safely switched to sustained-release felodipine (SR-F) and to assess whether SR-I provides better 24-hour blood pressure (BP) control than SR-F. Forty-one men receiving either SR-F 5 mg or SR-F 10 mg once daily for at least 6 months were switched to an equivalent dose of SR-I; BP was measured 2, 4, and 6 weeks after substitution. Significant reductions in systolic BP were seen in the SR-I 10 mg group after 4 weeks and they remained significantly lower through 6 weeks (p< or =0.05). Diastolic BP was reduced, but not significantly. After 6 weeks, SR-F therapy was reinstated, and BP returned toward baseline values. No serious adverse events were reported. SR-I can be safely substituted for SR-F and may provide better 24-hour control of BP than SR-F.

Isradipine treatment of hypertension in children: a single-center experience.

Many children with hypertension, particularly those with new-onset hypertension related to glomerulonephritis, organ transplantation, or other forms of secondary hypertension, require treatment with a short-acting antihypertensive in order to quickly achieve blood pressure (BP) control. We administered isradipine, a short-acting, second-generation calcium antagonist, to 72 such children. Retrospective data collection was undertaken to determine the effects of isradipine treatment. The mean age of children treated with isradipine was 74+/-55 months (mean+/-SD). Nearly all of these children had secondary hypertension and were initially treated as hospital inpatients for newly diagnosed hypertension. Mean isradipine dose was 0.36+/-0.17 mg/kg per day, with no significant variation in dose according to patient age. Isradipine was administered three times per day in most instances, but 21% of the time it was administered four times per day. An extemporaneous isradipine suspension was used in 62% of treatment courses. BP control was achieved with isradipine alone in 38 children; the remainder received isradipine in combination with additional antihypertensives. Comparison of pre-treatment BP with BP obtained 8+/-9 days later demonstrated a significant BP reduction with isradipine treatment, with a mean reduction of 14+/-13 mmHg for systolic BP and 13+/-15 mmHg for diastolic BP. There was no effect of isradipine treatment on heart rate. Adverse effects occurred in 9.5% of treatment courses, and included headache, flushing, dizziness, and tachycardia. We conclude that isradipine successfully lowers BP in hypertensive children with secondary forms of hypertension. Use of isradipine suspension allows infants and young children to be treated as readily as older children.

Phenytoin/isradipine interaction causing severe neurologic toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To report a young man on phenytoin who developed acute neurologic symptoms after isradipine was introduced to his treatment regimen and discuss the possible causes of this drug interaction. CASE SUMMARY: A 21-year-old white man, with propionic acidemia and seizures treated with phenytoin and carbamazepine, was started on isradipine for essential hypertension. Soon thereafter, he developed acute and severe lethargy, ataxia, dysarthria, and weakness that resolved once isradipine was withheld. Phenytoin concentrations were within normal limits or elevated, despite sequential reductions of phenytoin dosage, during concomitant isradipine administration. DISCUSSION: Isradipine is a known inhibitor of the CYP450 isoenzyme family. Although the daily dose of phenytoin was decreased significantly, phenytoin blood concentrations remained high, suggesting a pharmacokinetic interaction. Previously, the patient had never had neurologic symptoms associated with increased phenytoin concentrations. This also indicates a likely pharmacodynamic interaction between phenytoin and the calcium-channel blocker. Both phenytoin and isradipine have been shown to bind to calcium channels and to inhibit calcium entry into the cells. Binding of isradipine to the brain has been described in humans and animals, and calcium-channel blockers have been shown to cause potentiation of anticonvulsant action of phenytoin. CONCLUSIONS: Acute pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between phenytoin and isradipine were probably responsible for the lethargy, dysarthria, ataxia, and weakness our patient developed. The combination of phenytoin and calcium-channel blockers should be used with caution.

Life-threatening isradipine poisoning in a child.

Calcium channel blockers as a group are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality with toxic exposures. Isradipine, a cardioselective dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, rarely has been implicated, with only two reports in the literature of significant toxic reactions, one in an adult and another in a child. To our knowledge, we describe the first case of life-threatening isradipine poisoning in a child and provide documentation of serum drug levels. On arrival at the hospital, a 5-year-old girl had abdominal distention and bradycardia that rapidly progressed to asystole. She received 73 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and transvenous cardiac pacing and survived with an intact neurologic recovery. Serum concentrations of isradipine were 30-100 times those found with therapeutic use.

Hypertension after liver transplantation: a predictive role for pretreatment hemodynamics and effects of isradipine on the systemic and renal circulations.

Hypertension developing after liver transplantation during immunosuppression with cyclosporine A reflects an unusual hemodynamic transition from peripheral vasodilation to systemic and renal vasoconstriction. Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are often administered for their efficacy in promoting vasodilation, some liver transplant recipients report marked symptomatic intolerance to these agents. In the present study we examined systemic and renal responses to isradipine using systemic (thoracic bioimpedance) and renal hemodynamic measurements in 15 liver transplant recipients studied at the time of initial diagnosis of posttransplant hypertension and after 3 months of treatment. Circadian blood pressure patterns were examined by overnight ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before and during antihypertensive therapy. During isradipine administration, blood pressure decreased from 151 +/- 3/91 +/- 2 to 130 +/-3/81 +/- 2 mm Hg (P < .01) without change in renal blood flow (406 +/- 43 to 425 +/- 52 mL/min/1.73m2, P = NS) or renal vascular resistance index (25,674 +/-3312 to 20,520 +/- 2311 dynes x sec x cm(-5)/m2, P = NS). Pre-treatment differences in systemic vascular tone persisted during treatment and predicted the tendency for symptomatic tachycardia and flushing, predominantly in those with hyperdynamic circulations. Twice daily dosing of isradipine was associated with partial and significant restoration of the nocturnal decrease in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure decreased 5.5%, normal 13%), usually absent early after transplantation. Our results demonstrate the ability of hemodynamic measurements to predict the symptomatic response to antihypertensive therapy in the posttransplant setting.

[The hemodynamic effects of lomir and adalat in patients with postoperative arterial hypertension]. / Gemodinamicheskie éffekty lomira i adalata u bol'nykh s posleoperatsionnoi arterial'noi gipertenziei.

Comparison of the hypotensive effects of lomir (isradipine) and adalat (nifedipine) in 36 patients showed lomir to be more effective after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Normalization of arterial pressure started 5-10 min after lomir infusion, followed by a 24.5% increase in cardiac output and decrease in peripheral vascular resistance by 43.8%. Arterial pressure did not rise after lomir infusion was discontinued. With adalat, arterial pressure normalized 30 min later, and the therapeutic effect was achieved with a very high dose (5-7 times higher than recommended). Cardiac output did not change, and cardiac arrhythmias were observed in 11.7% patients. Therefore, lomir is a preferable Ca channel blocker for treating postoperative arterial hypertension after aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Nimodipine monotherapy and carbamazepine augmentation in patients with refractory recurrent affective illness.

Of 30 patients with treatment-refractory affective illness, 10 showed a moderate to marked response to blind nimodipine monotherapy compared with placebo on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Fourteen inadequately responsive patients (3 unipolar [UP], 11 bipolar [BP]) were treated with the blind addition of carbamazepine. Carbamazepine augmentation of nimodipine converted four (29%) of the partial responders to more robust responders. Patients who showed an excellent response to the nimodipine-carbamazepine combination included individual patients with patterns of rapid cycling, ultradian cycling, UP recurrent brief depression, and one with BP type II depression. When verapamil was blindly substituted for nimodipine, two BP patients failed to maintain improvement but responded again to nimodipine and remained well with a blind transition to another dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), isradipine. Mechanistic implications of the response to the dihydropyridine L-type CCB nimodipine alone and in combination with carbamazepine are discussed.