Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.965
Filter
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 336, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844670

ABSTRACT

Telogen effluvium is characterized by excessive hair shedding usually following a stressful event. Ferritin has been used in clinical practice as a biomarker of nonanemic iron deficiency in cases of telogen effluvium. During the years of the COVID19 pandemic, telogen effluvium was reported as a part of post covid manifestations. As ferritin was also a biomarker for inflammation in cases with covid infection, this study was designed to evaluate the value of ferritin in cases with postcovid telogen effluvium one hundred patients recovering from covid 19 for 4-12 weeks were included in the study, detailed drug and laboratory history was obtained and serum ferritin level was measured. the mean serum level of ferritin among telogen effluvium patients was significantly lower than controls (68.52 ± 126 and 137 ± 137.597 ug/L respectively). Patients with telogen effluvium used significantly more azithromycin and ivermectin and significantly less vitamin C, D, lactoferrin and zinc than the controls Although serum ferritin is lower among telogen effluvium patients, it was still higher than the cutoff value for diagnosing nonanemic iron deficiency, we suggest that it will not be a good biomarkers in these cases. Our secondary outcomes showed that dietary supplements used during active infection such as vitamin C, D, lactoferrin and zinc might have a preventive value on postcovid hair loss, while azithromycin and ivermectin could have a negative long term effect on telogen effluvium.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , COVID-19 , Dietary Supplements , Ferritins , Humans , Ferritins/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Adult , Male , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/blood , Alopecia/etiology , Hair , Young Adult
2.
Glob Public Health ; 19(1): 2350656, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718289

ABSTRACT

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public officials in the United States - from the President to governors, mayors, lawmakers, and even school district commissioners - touted unproven treatments for COVID-19 alongside, and sometimes as opposed to, mask and vaccine mandates. Utilising the framework of 'pharmaceutical messianism', our article focuses on three such cures - hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and monoclonal antibodies - to explore how pharmaceuticals were mobilised within politicised pandemic discourses. Using the states of Utah, Texas, and Florida as illustrative examples, we make the case for paying attention to pharmaceutical messianism at the subnational and local levels, which can very well determine pandemic responses and outcomes in contexts such as the US where subnational governments have wide autonomy. Moreover, we argue that aside from the affordability of the treatments being studied and the heterodox knowledge claiming their efficacy, the widespread uptake of these cures was also informed by popular medical (including immunological) knowledge, pre-existing attitudes toward 'orthodox' measures like vaccines and masks, and mistrust toward authorities and institutions identified with the 'medical establishment'. Taken together, our case studies affirm the recurrent nature of pharmaceutical messianism in times of health crises - while also refining the concept and exposing its limitations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hydroxychloroquine , Politics , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , United States , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Utah , Florida , Texas
3.
Pediatrics ; 153(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716573

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Repurposed medications for acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continued to be prescribed after results from rigorous studies and national guidelines discouraged use. We aimed to describe prescribing rates of nonrecommended medications for acute COVID-19 in children, associations with demographic factors, and provider type and specialty. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort of children <18 years in a large United States all-payer claims database, we identified prescriptions within 2 weeks of an acute COVID-19 diagnosis. We calculated prescription rate, performed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors, and described prescriber type and specialty during nonrecommended periods defined by national guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 3 082 626 COVID-19 diagnoses in 2 949 118 children between March 7, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin were prescribed in 0.03% and 0.14% of COVID-19 cases, respectively, during nonrecommended periods (after September 12, 2020 for HCQ and February 5, 2021 for ivermectin) with considerable variation by state. Prescription rates were 4 times the national average in Arkansas (HCQ) and Oklahoma (ivermectin). Older age, nonpublic insurance, and emergency department or urgent care visit were associated with increased risk of either prescription. Additionally, residence in nonurban and low-income areas was associated with ivermectin prescription. General practitioners had the highest rates of prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Although nonrecommended medication prescription rates were low, the overall COVID-19 burden translated into high numbers of ineffective and potentially harmful prescriptions. Understanding overuse patterns can help mitigate downstream consequences of misinformation. Reaching providers and parents with clear evidence-based recommendations is crucial to children's health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Child , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Female , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Male , Adolescent , Infant , United States/epidemiology , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn
4.
Parasit Vectors ; 17(1): 211, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The health and productivity of dairy goats continue to be impacted by gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and lungworms (LW). Eprinomectin (EPN) is frequently selected for treatment because it is generally effective and does not require a milk withdrawal period. However, some factors, such as lactation, can have an impact on EPN pharmacokinetics and potentially its efficacy. To evaluate whether this can alter the efficacy of Eprecis® 2%, an eprinomectin injectable solution, a study was performed in lactating goats using the dose currently registered in cattle, sheep and goats (0.2 mg/kg). METHODS: This study was a blinded, randomized, controlled trial performed according to the VICH guidelines. Eighteen (18) worm-free lactating goats were included and experimentally challenged on day 28 with a mixed culture of infective gastrointestinal and lung nematode larvae (Haemonchus contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Dictyocaulus filaria). At D-1, fecal samples were collected to confirm patent infection in all animals. On D0, the goats were randomly allocated into two groups of nine goats; group 1 was treated with Eprecis® 2% at 0.2 mg/kg BW by subcutaneous injection, while group 2 remained untreated. Fecal samples for egg counts were collected from all animals on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 14. On D14, all goats were killed, and the abomasum, small intestine and lungs were removed, processed and subsampled to record the number and species of worms. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. After treatment, the arithmetic mean FEC decreased in the treated group and remained < 5 EPG until the end of the study, while the arithmetic mean FEC in the control group remained > 849.0 EPG. At D14, goats in the treated group had very limited or zero total worm counts, whereas all animals from the control group had a high worm burden. The measured efficacy was 100.0% against H. contortus and T. colubriformis, 99.9% against T. circumcincta and 98.0% against D. filaria. CONCLUSIONS: Eprinomectin (Eprecis®, 20 mg/ml), administered at the label dose (0.2 mg/kg), is highly effective against gastrointestinal nematodes and lungworms in lactating goats.


Subject(s)
Feces , Goat Diseases , Goats , Ivermectin , Lactation , Nematode Infections , Animals , Ivermectin/analogs & derivatives , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/pharmacokinetics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Goat Diseases/drug therapy , Goat Diseases/parasitology , Female , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Nematode Infections/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/parasitology , Feces/parasitology , Lactation/drug effects , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/pharmacokinetics , Nematoda/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/veterinary , Gastrointestinal Diseases/parasitology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Lung/parasitology
5.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(5): 897-905, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the viral clearance and clinical outcomes of favipiravir (FPV) in outpatients being treated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Ivermectin (IVM), niclosamide (NCL), and FPV demonstrated synergistic effects in vitro for exceed 78% inhibiting severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label, 1:1, randomized, controlled trial was conducted on Thai patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received either combination FPV/IVM/NCL therapy or FPV alone to assess the rate of viral clearance among individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. RESULTS: Sixty non-high-risk comorbid patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomized; 30 received FPV/IVM/NCL, and 30 received FPV alone. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analysis of the cycle threshold value from SARS-CoV-2 PCR demonstrated no statistically significant differences in viral clearance rates between the combined FPV/IVM/NCL therapy group and the FPV-alone group. World Health Organization Clinical Progression scores and symptomatic improvement did not differ between arms on days 3, 6, and 10, and no adverse events were reported. No patients required hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or supplemental oxygen or died within 28 days. C-reactive protein on day 3 was lower in the FPV/IVM/NCL group. CONCLUSION: Viral clearance rates did not differ significantly between the FPV/IVM/NCL combination therapy and FPV-alone groups of individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, although the combined regimen demonstrated a synergistic effect in vitro. No discernible clinical benefit was observed. Further research is required to explore the potential benefits of FVP beyond its antiviral effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20230403007, Registered 3 April 2023 - Retrospectively registered,https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=TCTR20230403007.


Subject(s)
Amides , COVID-19 , Pyrazines , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Niclosamide , Acceleration , Treatment Outcome , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects
6.
Parasitol Res ; 123(4): 180, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592544

ABSTRACT

Because of recent reports of praziquantel resistance in schistosome infections, there have been suggestions to employ ivermectin as a possible alternative, especially as its chemical composition is different from that of praziquantel, so cross-resistance is not expected. In order to ascertain possible damage and elimination of worms, we used ivermectin by oral gavage in infected mice, at a high dose (30.1 mg/kg, bordering toxicity). We also tested the efficacy of the drug at various times postinfection (PI), to check on possible effect on young and mature stages of the parasites. Thus, we treated mice on days 21 and 22 or on days 41 and 42 and even on days 21, 22, 41, and 42 PI. None of the treatment regimens resulted in cure rates or signs of lessened pathology in the mice. We also compared the effect of ivermectin to that of artemisone, an artemisinin derivative which had served us in the past as an effective anti-schistosome drug, and there was a stark difference in the artemisone's efficacy compared to that of ivermectin; while ivermectin was not effective, artemisone eliminated most of the worms, prevented egg production and granulomatous inflammatory response. We assume that the reported lack of activity of ivermectin, in comparison with praziquantel and artemisinins, originates from the difference in their mode of action. In wake of our results, we suggest that ivermectin is not a suitable drug for treatment of schistosomiasis.


Subject(s)
Artemisinins , Schistosomatidae , Schistosomiasis , Animals , Mice , Praziquantel/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Schistosomiasis/drug therapy
7.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 133: 112073, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636372

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myocarditis is an important clinical issue which lacks specific treatment by now. Ivermectin (IVM) is an inhibitor of importin α/ß-mediated nuclear translocation. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effects of IVM on acute myocarditis. METHODS: Mouse models of coxsackie B3 virus (CVB3) infection-induced myocarditis and experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) were established to evaluate the effects of IVM. Cardiac functions were evaluated by echocardiography and Millar catheter. Cardiac inflammatory infiltration was assessed by histological staining. Cytometric bead array and quantitative real-time PCR were used to detect the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The macrophages and their M1/M2 polarization were analyzed via flow cytometry. Protein expression and binding were detected by co-immunoprecipitation, Western blotting and histological staining. The underlying mechanism was verified in vitro using CVB3-infected RAW264.7 macrophages. Cyclic polypeptide (cTN50) was synthesized to selectively inhibit the nuclear translocation of NF-κB/p65, and CVB3-infected RAW264.7 cells were treated with cTN50. RESULTS: Increased expression of importin ß was observed in both models. IVM treatment improved cardiac functions and reduced the cardiac inflammation associated with CVB3-myocarditis and EAM. Furthermore, the pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1ß/IL-6/TNF-α) levels were downregulated via the inhibition of the nuclear translocation of NF-κB/p65 in macrophages. IVM and cTN50 treatment also inhibited the nuclear translocation of NF-κB/p65 and downregulated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in RAW264.7 macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Ivermectin inhibits the nuclear translocation of NF-κB/p65 and the expression of major pro-inflammatory cytokines in myocarditis. The therapeutic effects of IVM on viral and non-viral myocarditis models suggest its potential application in the treatment of acute myocarditis.


Subject(s)
Ivermectin , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Myocarditis , Transcription Factor RelA , Animals , Myocarditis/drug therapy , Myocarditis/virology , Mice , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/pharmacology , RAW 264.7 Cells , Male , Transcription Factor RelA/metabolism , Coxsackievirus Infections/drug therapy , Enterovirus B, Human/drug effects , Macrophages/drug effects , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , beta Karyopherins/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Humans , Myocardium/pathology , Myocardium/metabolism
8.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(4): e0012118, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Sud-Ouest region of Burkina Faso (especially the Bougouriba valley) has been historically problematic with respect to onchocerciasis control, with a recrudescence of infections after vector control carried out the WHO Onchocerciasis Control Programme was halted in 1989. After 1996, mass drug administration of ivermectin was instigated to control the recrudescence so that it would no longer constitute a public health problem. However, in 2010 WHO changed its recommended policy from control to elimination, and in 2013 biannual Community-Directed Treatment with Ivermectin (CDTI) was instigated. Epidemiological surveys were carried-out in 2011 and 2018 to determine whether CDTI was producing a decline in infection levels and progress towards elimination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A cross-sectional study was conducted across 20 villages in four health districts in 2011 and 29 villages in 2018. Individuals aged five years and above were examined by skin-snip, and the prevalence and microfilarial load was determined for each village. In 2011, 75% of villages had some infections and 20% had prevalences >5%, with a mean prevalence across all villages of 2.63% (range 0.0-9.7%), and community microfilarial load ranging from 0 to 0.25 microfilariae per biopsy. In 2018, nine villages (= 31% of total) had some infections, with prevalences ranging from 0.41% to 3.54%, and a mean prevalence across all villages of 0.37%. Community microfilarial load ranged from 0 to 0.1. Amongst those people found to be microfilarial positive, 87% had a history of migration. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The endemicity of onchocerciasis infection in the Sud-Ouest region has declined to low levels and seems to be progressing towards elimination. Our findings indicated that biannual CDTI is having good effect, but it should continue for a number of years to ensure elimination of transmission. However, progress towards elimination has a troublesome history in this region, and it would be advisable to select more sentinel villages to have confidence in any future epidemiological and entomological surveys, especially Stop-MDA surveys. With positive individuals migrating between countries, cross-border collaboration needs more attention to ensure effective treatment for onchocerciasis elimination.


Subject(s)
Ivermectin , Onchocerciasis , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Humans , Burkina Faso/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Adult , Prevalence , Child , Adolescent , Animals , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Child, Preschool , Disease Eradication , Mass Drug Administration , Aged , Recurrence , Onchocerca volvulus/drug effects , Onchocerca volvulus/physiology
9.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(5): 951-952, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579698

ABSTRACT

Infection with Strongyloides stercoralis is often asymptomatic but can be life-threatening in immunocompromised patients, which can be prevented by ivermectin (IVM) treatment. The efficacy of IVM has been reported to have lessened over time in some regions as a consequence of prolonged use and mass treatment campaigns. Ivermectin has been used in Thailand for more than a decade; therefore, we investigated the efficacy of a single dose (200 µg/kg) of IVM against in asymptomatic strongyloidiasis in northeastern Thailand. Fecal samples were collected before and 2 weeks after treatment and were analyzed for the presence of Strongyloides using a modified agar plate culture and the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique. Our results showed that single-dose IVM treatment successfully eliminated S. stercoralis infection in asymptomatic individuals in the endemic area with a 100% cure rate, indicating the high efficacy of IVM treatment in strongyloidiasis in northeast Thailand.


Subject(s)
Feces , Ivermectin , Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Strongyloidiasis/drug therapy , Humans , Animals , Strongyloides stercoralis/drug effects , Thailand , Feces/parasitology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Antiparasitic Agents/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S138-S145, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concerns that annual mass administration of ivermectin, the predominant strategy for onchocerciasis control and elimination, may not lead to elimination of parasite transmission (EoT) in all endemic areas have increased interest in alternative treatment strategies. One such strategy is moxidectin. We performed an updated economic assessment of moxidectin- relative to ivermectin-based strategies. METHODS: We investigated annual and biannual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (aCDTI, bCDTI) and moxidectin (aCDTM, bCDTM) with minimal or enhanced coverage (65% or 80% of total population taking the drug, respectively) in intervention-naive areas with 30%, 50%, or 70% microfilarial baseline prevalence (representative of hypo-, meso-, and hyperendemic areas). We compared programmatic delivery costs for the number of treatments achieving 90% probability of EoT (EoT90), calculated with the individual-based stochastic transmission model EPIONCHO-IBM. We used the costs for 40 years of program delivery when EoT90 was not reached earlier. The delivery costs do not include drug costs. RESULTS: aCDTM and bCDTM achieved EoT90 with lower programmatic delivery costs than aCDTI with 1 exception: aCDTM with minimal coverage did not achieve EoT90 in hyperendemic areas within 40 years. With minimal coverage, bCDTI delivery costs as much or more than aCDTM and bCDTM. With enhanced coverage, programmatic delivery costs for aCDTM and bCDTM were lower than for aCDTI and bCDTI. CONCLUSIONS: Moxidectin-based strategies could accelerate progress toward EoT and reduce programmatic delivery costs compared with ivermectin-based strategies. The costs of moxidectin to national programs are needed to quantify whether delivery cost reductions will translate into overall program cost reduction.


Subject(s)
Ivermectin , Macrolides , Onchocerciasis , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Macrolides/economics , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Onchocerciasis/economics , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Humans , Ivermectin/economics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Mass Drug Administration/economics , Disease Eradication/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S131-S137, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662696

ABSTRACT

Mass drug administration (MDA) of antifilarial drugs is the main strategy for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF). Recent clinical trials indicated that the triple-drug therapy with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole (IDA) is much more effective against LF than the widely used two-drug combinations (albendazole plus either ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine). For IDA-based MDA, the stop-MDA decision is made based on microfilariae (mf) prevalence in adults. In this study, we assess how the probability of eventually reaching elimination of transmission depends on the critical threshold used in transmission assessment surveys (TAS-es) to define whether transmission was successfully suppressed and triple-drug MDA can be stopped. This analysis focuses on treatment-naive Indian settings. We do this for a range of epidemiological and programmatic contexts, using the established LYMFASIM model for transmission and control of LF. Based on our simulations, a single TAS, one year after the last MDA round, provides limited predictive value of having achieved suppressed transmission, while a higher MDA coverage increases elimination probability, thus leading to a higher predictive value. Every additional TAS, conditional on previous TAS-es being passed with the same threshold, further improves the predictive value for low values of stop-MDA thresholds. An mf prevalence threshold of 0.5% corresponding to TAS-3 results in ≥95% predictive value even when the MDA coverage is relatively low.


Subject(s)
Albendazole , Diethylcarbamazine , Drug Therapy, Combination , Elephantiasis, Filarial , Filaricides , Ivermectin , Mass Drug Administration , Microfilariae , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Humans , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Animals , India/epidemiology , Microfilariae/drug effects , Adult , Prevalence
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S93-S100, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is the cornerstone for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF). The proportion of the population that is never treated (NT) is a crucial determinant of whether this goal is achieved within reasonable time frames. METHODS: Using 2 individual-based stochastic LF transmission models, we assess the maximum permissible level of NT for which the 1% microfilaremia (mf) prevalence threshold can be achieved (with 90% probability) within 10 years under different scenarios of annual MDA coverage, drug combination and transmission setting. RESULTS: For Anopheles-transmission settings, we find that treating 80% of the eligible population annually with ivermectin + albendazole (IA) can achieve the 1% mf prevalence threshold within 10 years of annual treatment when baseline mf prevalence is 10%, as long as NT <10%. Higher proportions of NT are acceptable when more efficacious treatment regimens are used. For Culex-transmission settings with a low (5%) baseline mf prevalence and diethylcarbamazine + albendazole (DA) or ivermectin + diethylcarbamazine + albendazole (IDA) treatment, elimination can be reached if treatment coverage among eligibles is 80% or higher. For 10% baseline mf prevalence, the target can be achieved when the annual coverage is 80% and NT ≤15%. Higher infection prevalence or levels of NT would make achieving the target more difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of people never treated in MDA programmes for LF can strongly influence the achievement of elimination and the impact of NT is greater in high transmission areas. This study provides a starting point for further development of criteria for the evaluation of NT.


Subject(s)
Albendazole , Elephantiasis, Filarial , Filaricides , Ivermectin , Mass Drug Administration , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/transmission , Humans , Animals , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Anopheles/parasitology , Disease Eradication/methods , Wuchereria bancrofti/drug effects , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination
13.
Vet Parasitol ; 328: 110182, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603925

ABSTRACT

Anthelmintic performance against equine cyathostomins can be evaluated by two different non-terminal measures; the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) and the Egg Reappearance Period (ERP). Most available FECRT and ERP data have been determined in populations of young horses, and very little information is available from mature and senior horses. Furthermore, it is unknown how commonly occurring equine endocrine disorders such as Insulin dysregulation (ID) and Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) may interfere with these measurements, but it has been suggested that horses with these conditions could be more susceptible to parasitic infections. A research population of senior horses and horses with or without PPID, ID, or both were enrolled in this study. All strongylid egg count positive horses were included in an ivermectin (200 µg/kg) efficacy study. These were distributed among the following groups: ID: six, PPID: three, PPID and ID: seven, and healthy controls: three. Strongylid fecal egg counts were determined on the day of ivermectin administration, at two weeks post deworming, and on weekly intervals until eight weeks post treatment. Determination of FECRT and ERP were carried out following World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology guidelines. Results revealed high ivermectin efficacy with mean egg count reduction at 99.7% or above in all groups at two weeks post treatment. Egg reappearance was documented at six and seven weeks in the ID and PPID/ID groups, respectively, whereas the PPID and healthy control groups both had ERP at 8 weeks. Statistical analysis found no significant differences in egg count levels between groups during the study. The expected ERP for ivermectin is 8-10 weeks, meaning that two of the groups displayed shortened ERPs. However, due to the small group sizes, these data should be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, results do indicate a need for further investigation of the possible influence of endocrine disorders on anthelmintic performance in horses.


Subject(s)
Feces , Horse Diseases , Ivermectin , Parasite Egg Count , Animals , Horses , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Horse Diseases/drug therapy , Horse Diseases/parasitology , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Feces/parasitology , Female , Endocrine System Diseases/veterinary , Endocrine System Diseases/drug therapy , Male , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Antiparasitic Agents/therapeutic use , Antiparasitic Agents/pharmacology
14.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(3): e0012045, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strongyloides stercoralis is not endemic in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). However, approximately one third of Auckland residents are born in endemic countries. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and management of strongyloidiasis in Auckland, with a focus on migrants from Pacific Island Countries and Territories. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed clinical, laboratory and pharmacy records data for all people diagnosed with strongyloidiasis in the Auckland region between July 2012 and June 2022. People with negative Strongyloides serology were included to estimate seropositivity rate by country of birth. FINDINGS: Over ten years, 691 people were diagnosed with strongyloidiasis. Most diagnoses were made by serology alone (622, 90%). The median age was 63 years (range 15-92), 500 (72%) were male, and the majority were born in Polynesia (350, 51%), Fiji (130, 19%) or were of Pasifika ethnicity (an additional 7%). Twelve participants (1.7%) had severe strongyloidiasis at diagnosis. The total proportion treated with ivermectin was only 70% (484/691), with no differences between immunocompromised and immunocompetent participants, nor by ethnicity. The outcome of treatment (based on a combination of serology and/or eosinophilia and/or stool microscopy) could only be determined in 50% of the treated cohort. One participant failed treatment with ivermectin, experiencing recurrent strongyloidiasis, and another participant died in association with severe strongyloidiasis. The rate of 'positive' Strongyloides serology was highest among participants born in Samoa (48%), Fiji (39%), and Southeast Asian countries (34%). INTERPRETATION: Strongyloidiasis was common and under-treated in Auckland during the study period. Clinicians should have a low threshold for considering strongyloidiasis in migrants from endemic countries, including Polynesia and Fiji.


Subject(s)
Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis , Transients and Migrants , Animals , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Strongyloidiasis/diagnosis , Strongyloidiasis/drug therapy , Strongyloidiasis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ethnicity , Treatment Outcome , Pacific Island People
16.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(3): e0012073, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Control efforts of soil-transmitted helminthiases rely primarily on large scale administration of anthelminthic drugs. The assessment of drug efficacies and understanding of drug behavior is pivotal to the evaluation of treatment successes, both in preventive chemo-therapy programs as well as in research of novel treatment options. The current WHO guidelines recommend an interval of 14-21 days between the treatment and follow-up, yet no in-depth analysis of egg excretion patterns of Trichuris trichiura after treatment has been conducted to date. METHODS: Within the framework of a multi-country trial to assess the efficacy and safety of albendazole-ivermectin combination therapy vs albendazole monotherapy against T. trichiura infections, we conducted a study collecting daily stool samples over the period of 28 days post-treatment in 87 participants in Pak Khan, Lao PDR. Egg counts were derived by duplicate Kato-Katz on-site for T. trichiura, hookworm and Ascaris lumbricoides and stool sample aliquots were subsequently analyzed by qPCR for the detection of T. trichiura infections. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated for each day separately using data derived by Kato-Katz to determine the optimal timepoint at which to assess drug efficacy. RESULTS: Egg excretion patterns varied across treatment arms. For T. trichiura, only the albendazole-ivermectin treatment led to a considerable reduction in mean egg counts, whereas both treatments reduced hookworm egg counts and A. lumbricoides were cleared in all participants after day 7. For T. trichiura, we found sensitivity to be highest at days 18 and 22 when using egg counts as outcome and days 19 and 24 when using qPCR. Specificity was high (>0.9) from day 14 onwards. For hookworm, the highest sensitivity and specificity were found at days 17 and 25, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, the ideal time period to assess drug efficacy for soil-transmitted helminth infections would be between day 18 and 24. The current WHO recommendation of 14 to 21 days is likely to yield acceptable outcome measures for soil-transmitted helminth infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03527732.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics , Helminthiasis , Trichuriasis , Animals , Humans , Albendazole/adverse effects , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Soil , Trichuriasis/drug therapy , Helminthiasis/drug therapy , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Ancylostomatoidea , Trichuris , Feces
17.
J Infect ; 88(4): 106130, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evidence for whether ivermectin impacts recovery, hospital admissions, and longer-term outcomes in COVID-19 is contested. The WHO recommends its use only in the context of clinical trials. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised controlled trial, we included participants aged ≥18 years in the community, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and symptoms lasting ≤14 days. Participants were randomised to usual care, usual care plus ivermectin tablets (target 300-400 µg/kg per dose, once daily for 3 days), or usual care plus other interventions. Co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and COVID-19 related hospitalisation/death within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Recovery at 6 months was the primary, longer term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN86534580. FINDINGS: The primary analysis included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants (median symptom duration 5 days), randomised to ivermectin (n = 2157), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3398) from June 23, 2021 to July 1, 2022. Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the ivermectin group compared with usual care (hazard ratio 1·15 [95% Bayesian credible interval, 1·07 to 1·23], median decrease 2.06 days [1·00 to 3·06]), probability of meaningful effect (pre-specified hazard ratio ≥1.2) 0·192). COVID-19-related hospitalisations/deaths (odds ratio 1·02 [0·63 to 1·62]; estimated percentage difference 0% [-1% to 0·6%]), serious adverse events (three and five respectively), and the proportion feeling fully recovered were similar in both groups at 6 months (74·3% and 71·2% respectively (RR = 1·05, [1·02 to 1·08]) and also at 3 and 12 months. INTERPRETATION: Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-Cov-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted. FUNDING: UKRI/National Institute of Health Research (MC_PC_19079).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2 , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Bayes Theorem , Treatment Outcome
18.
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ; 24: 100527, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447333

ABSTRACT

Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis are the most important gastrointestinal nematodes causing serious losses in sheep production of tropical and subtropical regions. Prophylaxis of gastrointestinal nematode infections is based on anthelmintics use, but their frequent administration selects multiple-resistant parasites. To evaluate how the situation has changed over the last decades, the anthelmintic resistance status of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep flocks was assessed in the current study and compared to previous surveys. In each one of the 15 flocks evaluated, animals (n ≥ 7) were allocated into at least five groups and treated as follows: 1) untreated control; 2) albendazole; 3) levamisole; 4) ivermectin; and 5) monepantel. If more animals were available, two additional groups were included: 6) closantel, and 7) moxidectin. The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was carried out to evaluate the pre- and post-treatment using the SHINY tool. Haemonchus spp. was the most prevalent nematode from faecal cultures. The mean efficacy of albendazole was 40%. Only in two farms, levamisole presented a relatively high percentage of reduction in the FECRT about 90%, while ivermectin and moxidectin presented the worst mean efficacy of 34% and 21% among all farms, respectively. Like other anthelmintics, closantel demonstrated low efficacy (63%) across all farms evaluated. Monepantel presented an overall mean efficacy of 79%, but it was the only anthelmintic that presented efficacy ≥95%, in five farms. The results revealed that gastrointestinal nematodes with multiple anthelmintic resistance were prevalent in all 15 sheep herds. The research suggests that nematodes are becoming more and more resistant to various anthelmintic compounds, which has made the problem worse. This circumstance highlights the necessity to put into practice sustainable and long-lasting methods to prevent gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep husbandry.


Subject(s)
Aminoacetonitrile/analogs & derivatives , Anthelmintics , Haemonchus , Macrolides , Nematoda , Nematode Infections , Salicylanilides , Sheep Diseases , Animals , Sheep , Levamisole/pharmacology , Levamisole/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Nematode Infections/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/epidemiology , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Feces/parasitology , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/parasitology , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Drug Resistance
19.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(3): e0012059, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The potential impact of cumulative community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) on epilepsy epidemiology in Mvolo County, South Sudan, an onchocerciasis-endemic area with high epilepsy prevalence, was investigated. Annual CDTI was introduced in 2002 in Mvolo, with interruptions in 2016 and 2020. METHODS: Comprehensive house-to-house surveys in Mvolo (June 2020 and 2022) identified cases of epilepsy, including probable nodding syndrome (pNS). Community workers screened households in selected sites for suspected epilepsy, and medical doctors confirmed the diagnosis and determined the year of seizure onset. The incidence of epilepsy, including pNS, was analysed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Data on ivermectin intake and onchocerciasis-associated manifestations (itching and blindness) were collected. RESULTS: The surveys covered 15,755 (2020) and 15,092 (2022) individuals, identifying 809 (5.2%, 95% CI: 4.8-5.5%) and 672 (4.5%, 95% CI: 4.1-4.8%) epilepsy cases, respectively. Each survey reported that a third of the surveyed population experienced skin itching, and 3% were blind. Epilepsy incidence per 100,000 person-years gradually declined, from 326.5 (95% CI: 266.8-399.1) in 2013-2015 to 96.6 (95% CI: 65.5-141.7) in 2019-2021. Similarly, pNS incidence per 100,000 person-years decreased from 151.7 (95% CI: 112.7-203.4) to 27.0 (95% CI: 12.5-55.5). Coverage of CDTI was suboptimal, reaching only 64.0% of participants in 2019 and falling to 24.1% in 2021 following an interruption in 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions. Additionally, while 99.4% of cases had active epilepsy in 2022, less than a quarter of these had access to antiseizure medication. CONCLUSIONS: The observed decrease in epilepsy incidence despite suboptimal CDTI coverage highlights the potential impact of onchocerciasis control efforts and underscores the need to strengthen these efforts in Mvolo County and across South Sudan. As a proactive measure, Mvolo and neighbouring counties are transitioning to biannual CDTI. Furthermore, the substantial epilepsy treatment gap in Mvolo should be addressed.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Nodding Syndrome , Onchocerciasis , Humans , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/complications , Prospective Studies , Incidence , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/etiology , Prevalence , Nodding Syndrome/epidemiology , Pruritus
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 143: 107013, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the diversity and dynamics of Plasmodium infection in serially collected samples from asymptomatic participants of a clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in Gabon. We checked whether the baseline sample reflected the P. falciparum genotype and Plasmodium species diversity seen over 7 days of follow-up. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at inclusion, every 8 hours until hour 72, daily until day 7, and on day 14. Plasmodium species was determined by qPCR and pfmsp1 length polymorphism was assessed for P. falciparum genotyping. RESULTS: In 17/48 (35%) individuals, all pfmsp1 genotypes identified during the assessed period were detected at baseline; in 31/48 (65%), new genotypes were found during follow-up. Additional sampling at hour 24 allowed the identification of all genotypes seen over 7 days in 50% of the individuals. Ivermectin did not impact the genotype dynamics. Mixed Plasmodium spp. infections were detected in 28/49 (57%) individuals at baseline, and detection of non-falciparum infections during follow-up varied. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal complex intra-host dynamics of P. falciparum genotypes and Plasmodium species and underscore the importance of serial sampling in clinical trials for antimalarial drugs with asymptomatically P. falciparum-infected individuals. This might allow a more accurate identification of genotypes in multiple infections, impacting the assessment of drug efficacy.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections , Genotype , Ivermectin , Malaria, Falciparum , Humans , Gabon/epidemiology , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Malaria, Falciparum/parasitology , Malaria, Falciparum/epidemiology , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Male , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Female , Genetic Variation , Plasmodium falciparum/genetics , Plasmodium falciparum/drug effects , Plasmodium/genetics , Plasmodium/classification , Plasmodium/isolation & purification , Plasmodium/drug effects , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...