Effects of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees on self-reported mobility, quality of life, and psychological states in patients with transfemoral amputations.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effects of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (MPK) joint on self-mobility, body perceptions, depression, and quality of life in patients with unilateral transfemoral amputations (TFAs). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (28 males, mean age=38.5 years, age range=22-57) who had previously used non-MPKs and who were approved to use swing and stance phase-control MPKs were included in this 12-week clinical study. Before the MPK use and after the three-month follow-up, prosthetic use and locomotor capabilities were evaluated using the Houghton Scale and the Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI-5), respectively. Body perception was assessed using the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS). The depressive symptoms and quality of life were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score and the 36-Item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively. RESULTS: After MPK use, statistically significant ameliorations were observed in all outcome measures. The basic and advanced LCI-5 increased from 26.7±2.2 and 24.8±5.2 to 27.6±1.2 (p=0.007) and 27±2.1 (p=0.004), respectively. Houghton scores improved from 9±1 to 10.3±0.8 (p=0.000). The ABIS and BDI scores decreased from 43.2±10.9 and 5.7±6.6 to 37.1±8.9 (p=0.000) and 3.8±4.5 (p=0.015), respectively. Also, the SF-36 physical function and vitality subscales increased from 71.2±24.0 and 75.5±14.6 to 85.6±16.6 (p=0.001) and 81.7±14.1 (p=0.015), respectively. CONCLUSION: MPK use provides significant improvements in the locomotor capabilities, quality of life, and activities of daily living to patients with TFAs as well as improves their body image perceptions and depressive symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Self controlled study.

No difference in patient preference for medial pivot versus posterior-stabilized design in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Medial pivot (MP) TKA has been shown to mimic normal knee kinematics with long-term survivorship comparable to most contemporary TKA. However, there are inadequate evidences to suggest its superiority in terms of patient preference and satisfaction. The aim of this study is to compare the MP with posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA in terms of patient preference and satisfaction. METHODS: 46 patients with staged bilateral TKA were recruited. TKA with MP or PS design was performed at interval of 6-12 months. Patient preference, patient satisfaction score (0-100), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), range of motion (ROM), Pain Score, Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Function Score (KFS) and WOMAC Score were compared at up to 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age was 70 and 69.6% were female. There was no difference in all preoperative parameters, operative time and length of stay between two knees. No difference was found in in range of motion and all outcome scores at 6 months and 12 months. Satisfaction score was similar for the two designs (82 vs 85, p = n.s.) at 1 year after the second TKA. Proportion of patients with preference on one design over another was not significantly different (28.9 vs 35.6%, p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the superiority of MP TKA over PS TKA in terms of preference and satisfaction. The choice between MP TKA versus PS TKA maybe more a surgeon's preference than a patient's preference based on current evidence.

No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs continuously evolve with the aim of improving patient outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) results of a new TKA implant to its predecessor. The hypothesis of this study was that joint awareness and range of motion (ROM) of the newer design would be better than the classic design. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing TKA using the newer design (Attune®) were matched by age and gender to 200 patients with the classic design (LCS®). All patients underwent computer-navigated (Vector Vision, Brain-Lab, Germany) primary TKA by the same surgeon using the same technique. Data (FJS-12, WOMAC and ROM) were collected preoperatively and at 12 months follow-up at our implant registry. RESULTS: Compared to preoperative scores, FJS-12, WOMAC and ROM improved significantly at 12 months follow-up. In the Attune group, mean FJS-12 and WOMAC at follow-up were 67.6 (SD 27.8) and 14.8 (SD 14.9) respectively, compared to 70.8 (SD 33.8) and 15 (SD 17.9) in the LCS group. Mean postoperative ROM was similar in both groups (Attune 120°, range 90°-140°, SD 10.4 and LCS 120°, range 85°-140°, SD 10.3). CONCLUSION: The newer TKA and the predecessor design achieved comparable joint awareness, WOMAC scores and ROM at 1-year follow-up. The benefits expected of the newer design could not be observed in early clinical and PROs. The clinical relevance of this study is that it questions the importance of implant design as the single most important factor for patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Sports Activity After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a degenerative disease which affects the functional status and qua-lity of life of patients. The treatment of choice in advanced stages is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although the procedure consistently yields good results, functional limitations may persist after surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of TKA on the practice of sport and how this relates to factors such as demographic and clinical data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional cohort study of operated vs. unoperated patients. A standar-diz-ed instrument for data collection was employed. Information collected comprised personal, socio-demographic and clinical data. Patients were asked about their current practice of physical exercise. We also recorded group-specific data; for the operated group, we recorded data about the surgery and, for the unoperated group, we recorded data about the disease. RESULTS: Patients who had undergone TKA practiced sport twice as much as those who had not been opera-ted on yet (33.8% versus 15.5%). The prevalence of the practice of sports was significantly higher in older patients with lower levels of pain, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1.The findings of our study support the conclusion that patients are significantly more active after total knee arthroplasty. 2. Low and medium intensity sports modalities were more prevalent in operated patients. 3.We also identified that active patents tend to be older, with lower level of pain, have better functional class, and a higher level of education.

No difference in joint awareness after mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the patients ability to forget the artificial knee joint in everyday life who were randomized to be operated for mobile- or fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial evaluated the 3-year follow-up of the cemented mobile- and fixed-bearing TKA from the same brand in a series of 41 patients. Clinical examination was during the pre-, 6-week, 6-month, 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up containing multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the 12-item Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) at 3 years. Effect size was calculated for each PROM at 3-year follow-up to quantify the size of the difference between both bearings. RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up, general linear mixed model analysis showed that there were no significant or clinically relevant differences between the two groups for all outcome measures. Calculated effect sizes were small (<0.3) for all the PROMs except for the FJS-12; these were moderate (0.5). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that joint awareness was slightly lower in patients operated with the MB TKA with comparable improved clinical outcome and PROMs at 3-year follow-up. Measuring joint awareness with the FJS-12 is useful and provides more stringent information at 3-year follow-up compared to other PROMs and should be the PROM of choice at each follow-up after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Clinical Outcomes in Men and Women following Total Knee Arthroplasty with a High-Flex Knee: No Clinical Effect of Gender.

While it is generally recognized that anatomical differences exist between the male and female knee, the literature generally refutes the clinical need for gender-specific total knee prostheses. It has been found that standard, unisex knees perform as well, or better, in women than men. Recently, high-flex knees have become available that mechanically accommodate increased flexion yet no studies have directly compared the outcomes of these devices in men and women to see if gender-based differences exist. We retrospectively compared the performance of the high-flex Vanguard knee (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) in 716 male and 1,069 female knees. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.5% at 5.6-5.7 years for both genders. After 2 years, mean improvements in Knee Society Knee and Function scores for men and women (50.9 versus 46.3; 26.5 versus 23.1) and corresponding SF-12 Mental and Physical scores (0.2 versus 2.2; 13.7 versus 12.2) were similar with differences not clinically relevant. Postoperative motion gains as a function of preoperative motion level were virtually identical in men and women. This further confirms the suitability of unisex total knee prostheses for both men and women.

Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon(®) and Kinemax Plus prostheses.

INTRODUCTION: The Triathlon(®) (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, US) total knee replacement was designed to improve patient function and survivorship. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Triathlon(®) prosthesis produces better patient reported outcomes than a previous design by the same manufacturer, the Kinemax Plus. METHODS: The outcome of 233 knees of patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 40-80 years) who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis were compared with the outcomes of 220 knees of patients with a mean age of 70 years (range: 42-90 years) who received the Triathlon(®) prosthesis. Data were collected via postal questionnaire prior to surgery as well as at 8-12 weeks and at 1 year following surgery. Validated questionnaires were used including the WOMAC(®) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) pain and function scales, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life scale and the self-administered patient satisfaction scale. RESULTS: This study found that patients who had the Triathlon(®) prosthesis had significantly better pain relief (p<0.0001), function (p=0.028), knee related quality of life (p<0.0001) and satisfaction (p=0.0003) at three months after surgery than those who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis. In addition, knee related quality of life (p=0.002) and satisfaction (p=0.021) were significantly higher at one year after surgery in Triathlon(®) CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that return to function and reduction in pain may occur more quickly in patients with a Triathlon(®) prosthesis than in those with the Kinemax Plus.

Early evaluation of quality of life and clinical parameters after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Gonarthrosis is the most frequent indication to perform arthroplasty of the knee joint. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of selected factors on quality of life evaluation in patients after a knee arthroplasty for gonarthrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients aged 40 to 85 years (mean age 71.2 years) who underwent knee arthroplasty were examined. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess the quality of life of the patients. The questionnaires were completed by patients twice: 1-3 days before the operation and 6 weeks post-surgery. Age, gender, BMI, preoperative knee joint range of motion and limb axis, the presence of other implants, and the presence of a knee contracture before surgery were analysed. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated that sex, age, presence of other implants, axis and a preoperative knee contracture did not significantly influence questionnaire scores. As regards the range of knee flexion, outcomes after the arthroplasty were significantly better in patients with pre-operative ranges below 90 masculine than in patients with pre-operative ranges above 90 masculine. BMI had a significant influence on questionnaire scores. CONCLUSIONS: The BMI value and range of knee flexion before the arthroplasty significantly influenced the quality of life after knee arthroplasty, whereas gender, age, the presence of an additional endoprosthesis or pre-operative joint deformity did not.

Estudio multicéntrico sobre la repercusión de las lesiones meniscales y de ligamento cruzado anterior previas a la cirugía protésica en pacientes intervenidos de prótesis de rodilla / Multi-center study on the repercussion of meniscal and ACL injuries prior to prosthetic replacement in patients undergoing TKR

Objetivo. Evaluar la incidencia y repercusión de las lesiones e intervenciones previas en la articulación de la rodilla en pacientes operados de prótesis de rodilla. Material y método. Se registraron 474 pacientes diagnosticados de gonartrosis intervenidos con una prótesis total de rodilla (PTR) primaria en 5 centros españoles, durante 12 meses, analizando sus características morfológicas y las lesiones e intervenciones previas sufridas en la articulación de la rodilla comparado con una población aleatoria de 129 pacientes intervenidos, en los mismos centros y en el mismo período de tiempo, de prótesis total de cadera (PTC) primaria. En cada paciente analizamos la edad, el sexo, el lado intervenido, el peso, la talla y el índice de masa corporal (IMC: kg/m2), las prótesis previas en la articulación contralateral o en otras articulaciones y el año de su colocación. Los parámetros evaluados fueron la alineación de la rodilla, la actividad laboral desempeñada previamente y en el momento de la intervención, la actividad física, las enfermedades e intervenciones generales previas a la intervención, los traumatismos padecidos, las intervenciones en la articulación de la rodilla y el estado óseo. Resultados. No hemos encontrado diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el grupo PTR y PTC comparando los traumatismos previos, la actividad laboral, las intervenciones del sistema musculoesquelético previas ni tampoco la alineación de la rodilla. En el grupo de las PTR no encontramos diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las lesiones de rodilla previas con la edad, el peso, la talla o el IMC ni entre la técnica quirúrgica previa de la articulación de la rodilla con la edad, el peso, la talla o el IMC. Sin embargo, en el grupo PTR hubo un mayor número de lesiones meniscales y un mayor IMC que entre los operados de PTC. Además, en las PTR las mujeres presentaron un IMC mayor (p < 0,006). Las amas de casa tenían el IMC más elevado (p < 0,02) entre todos los grupos laborales. Conclusiones. Se constató una correlación significativa entre artrosis de rodilla y obesidad, y también una correlación baja entre meniscectomía previa y artrosis de rodilla. Por ello, el tratamiento de la obesidad debe ser una medida preventiva de la artrosis de rodilla, y por tanto de los PTR. Los pacientes operados de meniscectomía o rotura de ligamento cruzado anterior deben ser estudiados con mayor detenimiento (AU)

Purpose. To assess the incidence and repercussion of previous lesions to and procedures in the knee joint in patients undergoing TKR. Materials and methods. 474 subjects were included, who had undergone primary TKR with a diagnosis of gonarthrosis in 5 Spanish hospitals. The patients were followed up over a period of 12 months, during which their morphological characteristics as well as the earlier lesions and procedures they had had in the knee joint were analyzed. A comparison was made with a random control population of 129 patients who underwent a primary THR. For each patient we analyzed the following factors: age, gender, the operated side, weight, height and body mass index (BMI: kg/m2), any prior prostheses in the contralateral ¬ or any other - joint and the year it/they had been implanted. Other parameters assessed were: knee alignment, occupational profile of the patient at and prior to the time of operation, their degree of physical activity, any diseases or general operations suffered prior to the procedure, any trauma experienced, any surgery to the knee joint as well as the overall bone stock condition. Results. We did not find statistically significant differences between the TKR and the THR groups as regards previous trauma, occupational profile, previous surgery to the musculoskeletal system or knee alignment. In the TKR group, we did not find statistically significant differences between the previously sustained knee injuries and the patients' age, weight, height or BMI; or between the surgical technique used in any previous surgery to the knee joint and the patients' age, weight, height or BMI. Nonetheless, there was a larger number of meniscal lesions as well as a higher BMI in the TKR group than in the THR patients. Furthermore, in TKRs female patients showed a higher BMI (p<0,006), given that housewives had a higher BMI (p<0,02) then any of the other occupational groups. Conclusions. A significant correlation was found between knee osteoarthritis and obesity as well as a low correlation between previous meniscectomy and knee osteoarthritis. For that reason, obesity treatment should be a preventive measure against knee osteoarthritis and therefore it should be employed prior to a TKR. Patients undergoing a meniscectomy or ACL repair surgery should be considered more carefully (AU)

Quality of life after knee arthroplasty. A randomized study of 3 designs in 42 patients, compared after 4 years.

We assessed different yardsticks for outcome 4 (3-5) years after surgery in a prospective, randomized study of 42 patients, where 3 designs of cemmentless knee prostheses were used. The prognosis with regard to loosening, previously obtained by radiostereometry after 2 years of follow-up, was utilized. Patients with a prognosis of stable implant fixation (two thirds) were compared with those where loosening was predicted (one third). Hospital for Special Surgery score and Visual Analogue Scales regarding pain at rest, "first step" pain, pain during activity and global function, showed consistent postoperative improvements, but no differences between the design and prognosis groups were found. Radiolucent lines were registered both as yes/no and number of zones. Lines and prognosis were associated, but not lines and design groups. Quality of life assessment by the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire showed that the poor prognosis group had increased pain and significant disturbances of sleep and emotions, as well as difficulty in enjoying hobbies and holiday activities. No differences were found between the design groups. Altogether, the patients showed profiles comparable to a healthy reference group. We conclude that the Nottingham Health Profile is a sensitive, relevant and simple measure of outcome after knee arthroplasty.

The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team.

The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of major joint replacements in reducing pain and disability and to describe the burden of pain and disability that could be avoided by ordering the queues with respect to severity of disease. A secondary goal was to compare the uses of a general health status measure, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and a disease-specific measure, the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), for accomplishing the objectives. The results are based on interviews with 209 patients before and after they had surgery. Only 15.9% of the patients had surgery within 3 months' waiting time, 19.2% waited 4-6 months, 30.7% waited 7-9 months, and the remaining 34.1% waited a year or more. The waiting times were unrelated to the severity of pain or disability reported in the initial interview. Following surgery, there were large reductions in the WOMAC scores for pain, stiffness and difficulty in functioning. The SF-36 showed substantial improvements in relief from pain and in physical functioning, and reductions in role limitation due to physical problems, but not for scores related to mental health. The WOMAC scores were more responsive to the benefits of surgery than the SF-36 scores. Queuing systems keyed on burden of symptoms could reduce the burden of pain and disability suffered by patients awaiting surgery. The improvements from hip and knee replacements suggest that equitable access for these procedures should be a priority in Ontario.

Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty.

There are many studies of long-term recovery from major point arthroplasty, but little is known about the first days and weeks after operation. We measured function, emotional state and life evaluation before arthroplasty and at seven and 50 days after in a consecutive series of 40 hip and 23 knee replacements. Pain was relieved significantly at seven days after hip arthroplasty and even more at 50 days. In knee patients, pain relief was modest and was not apparent until 50 days. Functional ability was much improved by 50 days in hip patients, but hardly changed in knee patients. Positive mood and life satisfaction did not improve in either group. Our findings will help with more accurate information for patients before operation and also in judging the rate of recovery.

Prognostic factors for functional outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate whether baseline physical functioning, medical, psychosocial, or demographic variables predict functional outcome in patients undergoing total knee replacement. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed between December 1991 and August 1993. Consecutive, unilateral tricompartmental total knee replacement patients aged > or = 55 yr with osteoarthritis, who met criteria, were enrolled and evaluated one month before and 3 months after total knee replacement. The primary outcome measure was the Medical Outcome Study 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (known as the SF36) Physical Functioning Scale score. The outcome evaluator was not involved in patient care. RESULTS: A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to calculate the contribution of baseline variables to TKR outcome. Of the 27% of outcome variance explained by the model, demographic variables accounted for 4%, psychosocial variables (motivation, role functioning-emotional, and social functioning) for 19% (p = .013), medical variables (previous reconstruction, comorbidity, body mass index, bodily pain) for 2%, and baseline physical function for 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial variables are significantly related to total knee replacement functional outcome. Assessment of baseline psychological and social functioning may identify a subset of patients at risk for worse outcome. Specific interventions for these patients should be developed and evaluated as components of patient management prior to and after the procedure.

Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study.

The impact of hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL), physical ability and functioning was assessed in a two year follow-up study of 276 hip and 176 knee patients. The eligibility criteria were a diagnosis of primary arthrosis, a primary operation, and total joint arthroplasty. Patients were interviewed by questionnaire prior to the operation and 6, 12 and 24 months after the surgery. Subjective health outcomes were assessed with the Nottingham Health Profile and the 15D, a fifteen dimensional HRQOL measure. Patients' physical ability was assessed using measures of activities of daily living, and of physical mobility. Patient related outcome variations were analyzed by regression models. Major improvements were observed for pain, sleep and physical mobility. On average, in most of the quality of life dimensions the patients attained a similar quality of life as the comparable general population and only 4.7% of hip and 9.7% of knee patients had a worse HRQOL score at all three post-operative measurements than at baseline. Naturally, those with the poorest HRQOL pre-operatively gained most from the operation. High age did not lessen HRQOL gains from THA, but in TKA the oldest patients gained least in terms of 15D scores. Hip, but not knee patients with a long education tended to have greater improvements in quality of life and functional ability.

Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys.

A lack of consensus regarding the indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been cited as one reason for the variations in the rates of THA and TKA across the United States. The purposes of this study were to survey orthopaedists in a specific geographic area (New York City) regarding the candidacy of patients with osteoarthritis for THA or TKA and to compare indications for THA between orthopaedists at two academic medical centers, The Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States and McGill University in Canada. Orthopaedists were sent mail surveys asking about indications, factors affecting outcomes, and factors that might modify decisions for surgery. Approximately 45% of orthopaedists who performed THA and TKA in New York City in 1992 completed the surveys. Although there were wide variations among surgeons, most surgeons required at least severe pain daily, rest pain several days per week, transfer pain either several days per week (THA) or daily (TKA), and destruction of most of the joint space on radiograph. Younger age, comorbidity, technical difficulties, and lack of motivation modified the decision against surgery, whereas the desire to be independent and return to work swayed the decision for surgery. Most surgeons rated that patients with severe pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis would have a high likelihood of an excellent outcome, whereas those with comorbidity and certain technical factors would have only a moderate likelihood of an excellent outcome. In the U.S.-Canadian survey of THA, in which more than 90% of surgeons responded, Canadian surgeons tended to require more frequent pain and use of assistive devices for walking. Although there was a majority of opinion for several indications, there was no clear consensus among surgeons regarding the indications for THA and TKA. Possible explanations for this are that isolated indications are not as important as integrating and weighing several indications and that the patient's desire to proceed with THA or TKA is an important driving force in the decision to operate.

Evaluating a revised self-efficacy scale for preoperative patients.

Nurses conduct preoperative teaching to help patients cope with the adversities of surgery. Self-efficacy can predict an individual's behavior in aversive situations (eg, surgery); therefore, assessing patients' self-efficacy is one way perioperative nurses can plan patient care and help patients through the surgical experience. This study expands on the results of a previous evaluation of a preoperative self-efficacy scale. The content and face validity of the revised 15-item scale used in this study were assessed before the instrument was administered to preoperative patients. Evidence supports the validity of the multidimensional instrument. Internal consistency estimates > or = .84 support the subscales' reliability.

Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms.

Measuring the success of major surgeries such as total hip and total knee replacement is important for both case selection and public policy. Patients, purchasers, and practitioners must choose among clinical scoring systems, health status measures, and patient satisfaction ratings to monitor performance and ensure appropriate use of costly procedures. The present study compares results from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Status Survey and clinical scoring systems to direct patient ratings of success. Data come from a study of 128 total knee-replacement procedure and 211 total hip replacements. Analyses indicate that for both hip and knee patients, success is related closely to posttreatment physical function and bodily pain. Patient ratings of success also are related to the clinical scores used by physicians. Success is related less to change from pretreatment function for knee patients than for hip patients. Although patient ratings of success are generally consistent with other outcome measures, their relationship to patient expectations, satisfaction, and attributions need to be understood before they can become a useful tool for performance monitoring and case selection.

Health and quality of life before and after hip or knee arthroplasty.

The impact of hip and knee arthroplasty based on the patients' own evaluations of their health, quality of life, and physical ability was assessed using a cross-sectional study design. The eligibility criteria were a diagnosis of primary arthrosis, primary operation, and total joint arthroplasty. Preoperative hip and knee patient groups were compared with similar groups who underwent arthroplasty 2 or 5 years previously. Subjective health outcome was assessed with the Nottingham health profile and a 15-dimensional, health-related quality of life measure. Patients' physical ability was assessed using a measure of activities of daily living. Major improvements were observed for pain, sleep, range of motion, and physical ability. However, after surgery, patients were less healthy than the general population of the same age. The health status of patients operated on 2 or 5 years ago was similar, suggesting that health gains persist for several years.