Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 67
Filter
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 64(8): 1187-1193, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320051

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in the rates of epidural labor analgesia, continuation of epidural labor analgesia in the second stage of labor (CEADSSOL) was interrupted by care providers due to fears of increased risk of operative delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of CEADSSOL and the newer American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) definition of arrest of labor on the length of secondary stage of labor, newborn outcomes, and mode of delivery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data collection began during March 2014 and ended in May 2015, 1 year after implementation of both interventions. The primary outcome was the length of secondary stage of labor, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome (Apgar < 7, at 5 minutes). The implementation of continuing epidural analgesia during the second stage of labor was performed with 0.08%-0.15% ropivacaine and 0.1-0.2 µg/mL sufentanil. RESULTS: There were a total 10 414 deliveries during the study period. The length of the second stage of labor has no significant differences among groups. The cesarean delivery rate decreased 4.1% (36% vs 40.1%, P = .0038). Moreover, no significant difference was found in neonatal Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 minutes between two phases. Maternal outcomes remained unchanged. Post-intervention neonatal parameters including NICU admissions (P < .001), incidences of antibiotics usage (P < .0001), intubation (P = .0003), and 7 days mortality (P = .0020) were remarkably reduced compared to pre-interventions. CONCLUSION: The important finding of this study was the improvement in neonatal outcomes by implementing two simultaneous interventions without a cost of increased operative delivery.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Apgar Score , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(6): 890-898, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32196856

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of intramuscular hyocine n-butyl bromide (HBB) with placebo for shortening the duration of the first stage of labor in term pregnancies. METHODS: A double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of parturients who presented at term in the active phase of labor was conducted. They were randomly (1:1 ratio) given intramuscular injection of either 40 mg (2 mL) of HBB or 2 mL of water for injection as a placebo. The primary outcome measures were the duration of first and second stages of labor. Subgroup analysis of primigravid and multigravid women were also performed for various outcomes. We did intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were randomized to each group and none were lost to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the HBB and placebo groups. The mean duration of first stage of labor was noted to be significantly shorter in the HBB group for both the primigravidas (246.6 ± 21.9 vs 391.8 ± 56.6 min for control; P < 0.001) and for multigravidas (205.9 ± 17.8 vs 323.8 ± 16.0 min for control;P < 0.001).There was also significantly shorter duration of second stage of labor in the HBB group (primigravida: P = 0.013; multigravida: P = 0.016). The duration of third stage of labor, mode of delivery and maternal and/or neonatal outcomes for both classes of parturients were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: HBB is effective in reducing the first and second stages of labor without adverse maternal or neonatal outcome. HBB does not significantly influence the duration of third stage of labor including mode of delivery. More evidence is needed to further explore the potential useful role of HBB in the active phase of labor.


Subject(s)
Hydrocarbons, Brominated/administration & dosage , Labor Stage, First/drug effects , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Scopolamine/administration & dosage , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Dystocia/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hydrocarbons, Brominated/pharmacology , Injections , Nigeria , Pregnancy , Scopolamine/pharmacology , Time Factors
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(4): 651-656, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29986613

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess whether intermittent usage of oxytocin infusion increases the duration of the active phase of labor and reduces maternal and neonatal complications or not.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted of 200 consenting women with singleton pregnancy in the vertex position undergoing labor induction or augmentation at the Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children's Training and Research Hospital. Participants with cervical dilation of 3 cm were randomized to either continued or intermittent oxytocin infusion when cervical dilation reached 5 cm. The primary outcome measures were the duration of the active phase of labor, defined as the period of labor from 5 cm of cervical dilation to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were the duration of oxytocin infusion, mode of delivery, hyperstimulation, abnormalities in fetal heart rate, perineal tears, and neonatal outcomes.Results: The median duration of the active phase for the women with a vaginal delivery was longer in the intermittent oxytocin group than the continued oxytocin group, but it was not statistically significant (median, 6.91 vs. 7.58 h, p = .37). There was a significant difference in the duration of oxytocin infusion (median, 12.38 h in the intermittent group vs. 15.79 h in the continued group, p = .005). The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation was significantly greater in the continued group (21.1%) than the intermittent oxytocin group (3.8%) (p=.001).Conclusions: Intermittent usage of oxytocin infusion seems to make labor less complicated without lengthening duration of labor.


Subject(s)
Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Labor, Induced/methods , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(14): 2451-2458, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608007

ABSTRACT

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of epidural analgesia on the mode of delivery of nulliparous women with a term single fetus in vertex presentation (NTSV) that attained the second stage of labor.Study design: A single-center retrospective study provided a strict and constant department protocol for epidural analgesia practice and obstetric interventions, between 2005 and 2014. Epidural users were compared to nonusers. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes were diagnosis of prolonged second stage of labor and maternal and neonatal morbidities. The outcomes were evaluated by adjusted multivariate analyses (Adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR), 95% CI).Results: During the study period, 25,643 NTSV attained the second stage of labor; 18 676 (73%) epidural users and 6967 (27%) nonusers. Epidural users had an increased risk of instrumental delivery 2.48, [2.22-2.76], along with a lower risk of cesarean delivery 0.38, [0.29-0.50]. Notably, the diagnosis of prolonged second stage of labor was comparable among the study groups 0.99, [0.89-1.12]. The epidural users had a significantly higher risk of early postpartum hemorrhage 1.15, [1.04-1.27]. The risk for neonatal morbidity was comparable among the study groups 1.21 [0.90-1.63].Conclusion: Epidural analgesia in a population of NTSV that attains the second stage of labor is associated with a higher risk of instrumental delivery, nonetheless with a reduced risk of cesarean delivery; independent of the length of the second stage of labor is and safe for the neonate.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Extraction, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
6.
Birth ; 46(3): 500-508, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30198111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine use of medical interventions during labor has been identified as a clinical area for concern, since such routinized practice is not consistent with an evidence-based approach to care and continues to increase despite efforts to encourage normal childbirth. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore maternity health professionals' use of interventions during the second stage of labor in two hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to understand what influences their decision-making and practices. METHODS: This was an exploratory study using an ethnographic approach. Data collection methods included participant observations of 19 labors and births (n = 8 at City Hospital and n = 11 at King's Hospital) and semi-structured interviews with 29 health care professionals. In addition, the hospital labor and delivery ward policies and guidelines from those hospitals were collected. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Medical interventions were used during the second stage of labor routinely, regardless of clinical indication. Three core influences that shaped the clinical decision-making were identified as follows: (a) organizational culture, (b) a medical concept of birth, and (c) a hierarchical system of control. We suggest that the clinical decision-making and routine practice in this setting arises out of the interface between these three core influences whereby hierarchical control and clinicians' exercise of power and feelings of powerlessness are fundamental drivers for an organizational culture of medicalized childbirth, despite the differing models of childbirth which professionals described. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decisions relating to the use of interventions during childbirth are both complex and socially negotiated. The findings reflect the complexity of the use of interventions during the second stage of labor and the multiple influences on professionals' practices. We have shown how three key influences interact to shape clinical decision-making during the second stage of labor in this cultural setting and how the use of medical interventions can be analyzed as an illustration of the power dynamic in the maternity health care system. We suggest that written policies are insufficient to bring about evidence-based practice and approaches to change need to take into account these different levels of influence.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Medicalization , Parturition/ethnology , Anthropology, Cultural , Attitude of Health Personnel/ethnology , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/ethnology , Pregnancy , Saudi Arabia
8.
J Ultrasound ; 21(1): 41-52, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492840

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the progression and rotation of the fetal head during the second stage of labor using translabial ultrasound and to compare ultrasonographic data obtained in nulliparous women both receiving and not receiving neuraxial analgesia. METHODS: The 49 patients enrolled in the study were divided into two groups according to receiving or not receiving neuraxial analgesia. Every half hour from full dilation to delivery, the ultrasonographic translabial parameters of Angle of Progression, Head Symphysis Distance, and Midline Angle were obtained and recorded by a single operator. Then, these records were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Patients that underwent neuraxial analgesia presented with increased duration of the second stage of labor, with mean values of Angle of Progression significantly higher and of Midline Angle significantly lower for each time interval studied compared to patients without analgesia. A borderline significant relationship was found between administration of neuraxial analgesia and Head Symphysis Distance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that combined spinal-epidural analgesia influences the duration of the second stage of labor and the initial progression and rotation of the fetal head through the birth canal, but not the kind of delivery. A correlation between Angle of Progression values and success in the application of a vacuum has been reported by other authors and confirmed in our study.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Delivery, Obstetric , Labor Stage, Second , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
9.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 38(2): 167-171, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28784054

ABSTRACT

Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) occurs in about 8-10% of pregnancies and its most important complication is chorioamnionitis, so labour induction has an important role in this situation. This study was performed to compare oxytocin and sublingual Misoprostol for labour induction in PROM cases with term pregnancy. A total of 270 pregnant women who had spontaneous rupture of membrane and unripe cervix were enrolled. The first group underwent Oxytocin infusion according to low-dose standard protocol and the second group received 25 µg sublingual Misoprostol every 4 h. Time interval from induction to the beginning of active phase of labour was similar in both groups. Second stage of labour was significantly shorter in misoprostol group (p < .05). Although, some maternal side-effects were significantly higher in misoprostol group (p < .001), but 5 minute Apgar score was significantly better in this group. In conclusion, sublingual misoprostol was associated with better neonatal outcomes was more effective than oxytocin for labour induction in PROM cases. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: PROM occurs in about 8-10% of pregnancies; about 60% of these cases are term pregnancies. Most experts recommend early induction of labour in term PROM cases with an eye towards avoiding increased morbidity and mortality. Oxytocin is the most frequently used agent that is administered intravenously for the purpose of labour induction. Misoprostol is an alternative to oxytocin and is simpler to use, as it is administered via the oral, buccal, sublingual, rectal and vaginal routes rather than intravenously. What do the results of this study add: Time interval from induction to the beginning of active phase of labour was similar in both groups. Second stage of labour was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group. Although, some maternal side-effects were significantly higher in misoprostol group, the 5 minute Apgar score was significantly better in this group. What are the implications of these finding for clinical practice and/or further research: Sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour in PROM cases is more effective than oxytocin and its neonatal outcomes are better. Due to its easy prescription and better labour outcomes, sub lingual misoprostol may be a better choice for labour induction in PROM cases.


Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/drug therapy , Labor, Induced/methods , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Apgar Score , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Pregnancy , Term Birth , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(5): 1090-1096, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and harms of discontinuation of oxytocin after the active phase of labor is reached. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (ie, MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Scielo) were searched from their inception until April 2017. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included all randomized controlled trials comparing discontinuation (ie, intervention group) and continuation (ie, control group) of oxytocin infusion after the active phase of labor is reached, either after induction or augmentation of labor. Discontinuation of oxytocin infusion was defined as discontinuing oxytocin infusion when the active phase of labor was achieved. Continuation of oxytocin infusion was defined as continuing oxytocin infusion until delivery. Only trials in singleton gestations with vertex presentation at term were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials, including 1,538 singleton gestations, were identified as relevant and included in the meta-analysis. All nine trials included only women undergoing induction of labor. In the discontinuation group, if arrest of labor occurred, usually defined as no cervical dilation in 2 hours or inadequate uterine contractions for 2 hours or more, oxytocin infusion was restarted. Women in the control group had oxytocin continued until delivery usually at the same dose used at the time the active phase was reached. Women who were randomized to have discontinuation of oxytocin infusion after the active phase of labor was reached had a significantly lower risk of cesarean delivery (9.3% compared with 14.7%; relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.87) and of uterine tachysystole (6.2% compared with 13.1%; relative risk 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.84) compared with those who were randomized to have continuation of oxytocin infusion until delivery. Discontinuation of oxytocin infusion was associated with an increase in the duration of the active phase of labor (mean difference 27.65 minutes, 95% CI 3.94-51.36). CONCLUSION: In singleton gestations with cephalic presentation at term undergoing induction, discontinuation of oxytocin infusion after the active phase of labor at approximately 5 cm is reached reduces the risk of cesarean delivery and of uterine tachysystole compared with continuous oxytocin infusion. Given this evidence, discontinuation of oxytocin infusion once the active stage of labor is established in women being induced should be considered as an alternative management plan.


Subject(s)
Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Labor, Induced/methods , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Withholding Treatment , Adult , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, First/drug effects , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Uterine Contraction/drug effects
11.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(5): 1097-1103, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016499

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether maintaining a motor-sparing epidural analgesia infusion affects the duration of the second stage of labor in nulliparous parturients compared with a placebo control. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving nulliparous women with term cephalic singleton pregnancies who requested epidural analgesia. All women received epidural analgesia for the first stage of labor using 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 micrograms/mL sufentanil with patient-controlled epidural analgesia. At the onset of the second stage of labor, women were randomized to receive a blinded infusion of the same solution or placebo saline infusion. The primary outcome was the duration of the second stage of labor. A sample size of 200 per group (400 total) was planned to identify at least a 15% difference in duration. RESULTS: Between March 2015 and September 2015, 560 patients were screened and 400 patients (200 in each group) completed the study. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, the duration of the second stage was similar between groups (epidural 52±27 minutes compared with saline 51±25 minutes, P=.52). The spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was also similar (epidural 193 [96.5%] compared with saline 198 [99%], P=.17). Pain scores were similar between groups at each measurement during the second stage. More women who received placebo reported satisfaction scores of 8 or less (epidural 32 [16%] compared with saline 61 [30.5%], P=.001). CONCLUSION: Maintaining the infusion of epidural medication had no effect on the duration of the second stage of labor compared with a placebo infusion. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar. A low concentration of epidural local anesthetic does not affect the duration of the second stage of labor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx, ChiCTR-IOR-15005875.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Labor Pain/drug therapy , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Amides/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Ropivacaine , Sufentanil/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Reprod Sci ; 24(8): 1214-1220, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), used to relieve pain during delivery, delays labor but the mechanism is unknown. The aim was to investigate the effects of PCEA on uterine and abdominal muscles electromyographic (EMG) activity during the second stage of labor. METHODS: This study included 45 nulliparous pregnant women without PCEA, 42 women with standard PCEA treatment given during the first stage of labor and stopped near the end of the first stage, and 22 women with standard PCEA treatment with continued use throughout the first and second stages of labor. The EMG signals were recorded from the abdominal surface using PowerLab hardware and LabChart software (ADInstruments, New South Wales, Australia) and filtered to separate uterine and abdominal EMG. Various EMG burst parameters were obtained. RESULTS: There are no differences ( P > .05) in the age, body mass index, fetal weight, and Apgar scores between the patients from the various groups. PCEA (both stopped and continued) inhibits ( P < .05) duration, number of bursts, and root mean square of uterine EMG. PCEA also produces statistically significant ( P < .001) reductions in abdominal EMG. The decrease in EMG activity is accompanied by a significant ( P < .001) prolongation of the second stage duration (PCEA continued = 95.08 ± 8.60 minutes, PCEA stopped = 79.39 ± 6.25 minutes, no PCEA = 61.00 ± 7.23 minutes). CONCLUSION: PCEA suppresses uterine and abdominal muscle EMG during the second stage of labor but inhibition depends upon the treatment schedule. PCEA prolongs the duration of labor by inhibition of uterine and abdominal muscle and neural activity.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Labor Stage, Second/physiology , Myometrium/physiology , Abdominal Muscles/drug effects , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Myometrium/drug effects , Pregnancy
14.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 30(4): 461-465, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27050812

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Management of prolonged second stage of labor remains a clinical challenge. Nulliparous with epidurals are the most likely women to have a prolonged second stage and can be difficult to manage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the maternal and fetal morbidities associated with prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women with epidurals. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Ovid and Scopus searches for case series evaluating the morbidities of prolonged second stage of labor. Search terms used were "prolonged", "second stage", and "labor". Prolonged second stage was defined as three hours or more. Retrospective case series of prolonged second stage in nulliparous women with epidurals were identified. The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Two retrospective series with 5350 nulliparous women with prolonged second stage were identified. 76.3% (4 081/5 350) had an epidural. Of all nulliparous women with an epidural, 11.5% (4 081/35 469) had prolonged second stage. Cesarean Delivery occurred in 19.8% of these cases (782/4 081), while 80.2% had a vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Over three quarters of nulliparous women with epidural diagnosed with a prolonged second stage deliver vaginally.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Parity , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/physiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
15.
Women Birth ; 30(1): e39-e45, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27692959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The expansion of the medicalisation of childbirth has been described in the literature as being a global phenomenon. The vignette described in this paper, selected from an ethnographic study of routine intervention in Saudi Arabian hospitals illustrates how the worldwide spread of the bio-medical model does not take place within a cultural vacuum. AIM: To illuminate the ways in which the medicalisation of birth may be understood and practised in different cultural settings, through a vignette of a specific birth, drawn as a typical case from an ethnographic study that investigated clinical decision-making in the second stage of labour in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Ethnographic data collection methods, including participant observation and interviews. The data presented in this paper are drawn from ethnographic field notes collected during field work in Saudi Arabia, and informed by analysis of a wider set of field notes and interviews with professionals working in this context. FINDINGS: While the medicalisation of care is a universal phenomenon, the ways in which the care of women is managed using routine medical intervention are framed by the local cultural context in which these practices take place. DISCUSSION: The ethnographic data presented in this paper shows the medicalisation of birth thesis to be incomplete. The evidence presented in this paper illustrates how local belief systems are not so much subsumed by the expansion of the bio-medical model of childbirth, rather they may actively facilitate a process of localised reinterpretation of such universalised and standardised practices. In this case, aspects of the social and cultural context of Jeddah operates to intensify the biomedical model at the expense of respectful maternity care. CONCLUSION: In this article, field note data on the birth of one Saudi Arabian woman is used as an illustration of how the medicalisation of childbirth has been appropriated and reinterpreted in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Medicalization , Parturition/ethnology , Anthropology, Cultural , Attitude of Health Personnel/ethnology , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Labor Stage, Second/ethnology , Pregnancy , Saudi Arabia
16.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(19): 3098-103, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26524932

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors affecting neonatal acidemia, including occurrence of tachysystole/hypertonus in fetuses exposed to oxytocin during labour and with continuously-monitored fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings. METHODS: Prospective observational study of all women with term pregnancies who received oxytocin for induction/augmentation of labour. FHR tracings were prospectively classified using ACOG classification. Independent predictors of neonatal acidemia were identified using multivariate linear regression with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: We included 430 women, 236 of whom (54.9%) had spontaneous onset of labour. The duration of active phase of the second stage of labour and the presence of abnormal FHR tracing during labour were significantly associated with UA pH (p < 0.001) and BE (p < 0.001), while maximum dose of oxytocin (p < 0.17; p < 0.7) and tachysystole (p < 0.9; p < 0.8) were not. At logistic regression, the duration of active phase of the second stage of labour was independently predictive of neonatal acidemia (p < 0.009) while abnormal FHR tracing approached significance (p < 0.088). CONCLUSIONS: In women receiving oxytocin during labour, the duration of active phase of the second stage of labour correlates with neonatal acidemia, whereas maximum dose of oxytocin, duration of oxytocin administration and occurrence of tachysystole during labour do not.


Subject(s)
Acidosis/prevention & control , Heart Rate, Fetal/drug effects , Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Labor, Induced , Oxytocics/pharmacology , Oxytocin/pharmacology , Cardiotocography , Female , Fetus , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor Stage, Second/physiology , Logistic Models , Obstetric Labor Complications , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
17.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(18): 3024-9, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26669965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Dianatal® is a bioadhesive gliding film which reduces the opposing force to vaginal childbirth. We aimed to investigate the safety, applicability, and impact of Dianatal® obstetric gel on second stage of labor and perineal integrity. METHODS: Low-risk singleton pregnancies at term were prospectively enrolled. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either labor management without using obstetric gel, or labor management using intermittent application of obstetric gel into the birth canal during vaginal examinations, starting at active phase of labor (≥4 cm dilation). The primary measured outcome was the length of second stage of labor. RESULTS: Overall, 200 cases were analyzed. Demographic, obstetrical, and labor characteristics were similar between the groups. Neither adverse events nor maternal or neonatal side effects were observed. The mean lengths of the active and second stages of labor were comparable between the obstetric gel-treated and the control groups (157 versus 219 min and 48 versus 56 min, respectively). None of the women had grade III/IV perineal tears. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were not negatively influenced by using obstetric gel. No difference was found after sub-group analysis for spontaneous vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Dianatal® obstetric gel is safe in terms of maternal or neonatal use. Albeit a trend toward shorter labor stages using Dianatal® obstetric gel, no significant differences were noted among the groups. In order to further investigate the influence of the obstetric gel on labor stage interval, perineal integrity and maternal and neonatal outcomes, larger randomized clinical trials are needed to be carried out.


Subject(s)
Labor Stage, Second/drug effects , Lubricants/administration & dosage , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Perineum/injuries , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL