Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 594
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1352176, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846603

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and wound healing conditions of common unintentional skin lacerations in children. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 1,107 children, aged 0-12 years, with skin lacerations who received emergency treatment at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 1, 2019, to December 30, 2022. Data on age, injury site, time from injury to suturing, and wound healing conditions were statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 1,107 cases, 714 (64.5%) were male and 393 (35.5%) were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.8:1; median age was 5 years (IQR, 3-7). Infants and toddlers (0-3 years old) constituted the highest proportion, accounting for 36.3% (402 cases). The number of children aged over 3 years gradually decreased with increasing age. In younger children, the most common injuries were to the forehead, scalp, and lower jaw; in school-aged children, the proportion of limb and trunk injuries significantly increased. Age (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.46), outdoor injuries (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.18-4.16), lower limb injuries (OR, 5.35; 95% CI, 2.86-10.00), and wound length greater than 3 cm (OR, 10.65; 95% CI, 5.02-22.60) were significant risk factors for poor wound healing. The risk of poor wound healing increased by 34% for each additional year of age. Conclusion: In children, the common sites of unintentional skin lacerations show distinct age and gender distribution characteristics. Older age, outdoor injuries, longer wound lengths, and lower limb injuries are independent risk factors for poor wound healing.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Wound Healing , Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Child , China/epidemiology , Lacerations/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Risk Factors , Accidental Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
2.
Epidemiol Serv Saude ; 33: e2023621, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome. CONCLUSION: The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations. MAIN RESULTS: Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event. IMPLICATIONS FOR SERVICES: Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines. PERSPECTIVES: New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Pregnancy , Adolescent , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Perception
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(6): 2761-2769, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613578

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The effects of episiotomy and second-degree tears on postpartum sexual function are key areas of enquiry in women's health research. Episiotomy and second-degree tears are common procedures and injuries that occur during childbirth. Understanding their impact on post-childbirth sexuality is crucial to women's overall well-being. This study aimed to examine the relationship between episiotomy, second-degree tears, and post childbirth sexuality. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was employed, including 83 women who gave birth to Cáceres in 2017. Participants were evaluated based on sociodemographic and sexual health factors. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in dyspareunia or sexual function between women who underwent episiotomies and those with second-degree tears. However, women who underwent episiotomies waited longer before resuming sexual activity after childbirth. Factors such as age, number of previous births, employment status, educational level, and breastfeeding status affected the timing and frequency of postpartum sexual activity. CONCLUSION: Dyspareunia negatively affects various aspects of sexual function. When comparing episiotomy and second-degree tears, their impacts on postpartum sexual function were similar. However, episiotomy delays the resumption of sexual activity. Sociodemographic factors significantly influence postpartum sexual health. These findings highlight the importance of individualised interventions and support for new mothers during the postpartum period to address potential sexual health concerns.


Subject(s)
Dyspareunia , Episiotomy , Postpartum Period , Humans , Female , Episiotomy/adverse effects , Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyspareunia/etiology , Dyspareunia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Lacerations/etiology , Lacerations/epidemiology , Young Adult , Sexual Behavior , Perineum/injuries
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 80: 87-90, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520802

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and patterns of gymnastics-related Head & Neck trauma injuries using the NEISS database from 2001 to 2020. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of a national database. METHODS: Gymnastics-related ED visits between 2001 and 2020 were queried from the NEISS database. Bivariate chi-squared analyses were used to compare injury demographics, location, type, and disposition. Fracture location was identified using the narrative description of each case and were divided into subtypes for further analysis. RESULTS: 1455 gymnastics-related head and neck traumatic injuries were identified. The majority were in females (65.8%). The most common presenting age group was pediatric (≤18 years) (92.7%), and the largest racial group was Caucasian (51.5%). Of all location subtypes, facial injuries were the most common presenting injury type overall (45.2%). Regarding injury types, lacerations were most common (36.8%), followed by dental injury (30.7%) and fractures (21.2%). The most common location of head and neck fractures was the nose (45.8%), followed by cervical spine (16.7%) and orbit (13.3%). The majority (95.7%) of gymnastics-related head and neck traumatic injuries presenting to the ED were treated and discharged. CONCLUSION: This study characterizes gymnastics-related head and neck injuries which is a topic that is under-studied. The findings from this study are helpful for gymnasts and those who care for them including providers, coaches and guardians, and this data may help inform future guidelines for treatment and injury prevention.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma , Gymnastics , Neck Injuries , Humans , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child , Neck Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Gymnastics/injuries , Young Adult , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Middle Aged , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Tooth Injuries/epidemiology , Lacerations/epidemiology
5.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(3): 104076, 2024 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368761

ABSTRACT

Among lacrimal system injuries, canalicular lacerations are at the top of the list. Men are more affected than women, but children are most likely to experience such trauma. The cause depends on the patient's age: in young children, there is a higher prevalence of animal bites (dogs and cats); in young adults, fights predominate, since motor vehicle accidents have become less common; in the elderly, falls are among the most frequent causes. Tetanus vaccination is required in all cases, but assessment for rabies exposure is necessary in the case of dog or cat bites. Diagnosis is very simple: it is based on examination or wound probing. Other head, facial, or ocular injuries must be excluded; for example, an injury to the globe must take precedence over a canalicular laceration. In the absence of an ocular injury, the canalicular wound should be managed surgically within 48hours under an operating microscope: identification of both severed ends of the injured canaliculus, suture of the severed canaliculus with monofilament suture, and appropriate lacrimal intubation if indicated. Other trauma to the lacrimal system, such as sharp or blunt trauma to the lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct, are much rarer.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Eye Injuries , Lacerations , Lacrimal Apparatus , Child , Aged , Male , Young Adult , Female , Humans , Animals , Cats , Dogs , Child, Preschool , Lacrimal Apparatus/surgery , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Eye Injuries/surgery , Lacerations/diagnosis , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology
6.
Turk J Ophthalmol ; 54(1): 17-22, 2024 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385316

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the demographic, etiological, and accompanying clinical factors in eyelid lacerations (EL). Materials and Methods: The records of patients who presented to our clinic between 2018 and 2022 with eyelid trauma were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, cause of injury, clinical findings, accompanying ocular findings, and additional complications were analyzed. Results: The study included 135 patients (106 male, 29 female) with a mean age of 37.0±18.6 years. Among the patients, 29 (21.4%) were 18 years old or younger, 93 (68.8%) were between 19 and 64 years old, and 13 (9.6%) were 65 years old or older. EL were most caused by various sharp objects in 44 patients (33%), blunt trauma in 40 patients (30%), falls in 30 patients (22%), and traffic accidents in 21 patients (15%). Fifteen eyes (11.1%) had foreign bodies at the wound site. Thirty patients (22.2%) (20 lower eyelid, 10 upper eyelid) had accompanying canalicular lacerations. Twenty-three (17%) patients had accompanying conjunctival lacerations, 14 (10.3%) had open-globe injury, 10 (7.4%) had corneal epithelial defects, 9 (6.6%) had intravitreal hemorrhage, 6 (4.4%) had hyphema, and 5 (3.7%) had retinal detachment. Four patients had lid notching and 1 patient (0.7%) had ectropion. Five patients (3.7%) required suturing. No additional complications were observed. Conclusion: EL are more commonly seen in young adulthood and in males. The most common mechanism of injury is impact by various objects. Eyelash margin and canalicular lacerations frequently accompany these injuries. Serious ocular pathologies such as hyphema and open-globe injury can accompany eyelid trauma.


Subject(s)
Eye Injuries , Lacerations , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Aged , Lacerations/diagnosis , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Hyphema/complications , Retrospective Studies , Eye Injuries/complications , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Eyelids , Demography
7.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 52(5): 343-347, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Female genital mutilation (FGM) covers all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external genitalia for non-therapeutic purposes. The period of pregnancy and childbirth is probably more at risk of complications for these women. The main aim of this study was to compare obstetrical, maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a history of female genital mutilation with patients without such a history. METHODS: All deliveries taking place between January 2005 and June 2022 at Besançon University Hospital in patients with a history of FGM were included. This group was compared with a randomly selected group of deliveries of patients with no history of FGM. A total of 87 deliveries with a history of FGM were included and compared with 696 deliveries with no history of FGM. RESULTS: There were significantly more instrumental deliveries (27.6% vs. 17.5%, P=0.01), more caesarean sections (23% vs. 14.1%, P=0.01), more episiotomies (9.2% vs. 0.7%, P<0.01), more first-degree perineal tears (30.8% vs. 20.8%, P=0.02), second-degree (13.9% vs. 5.3%, P<0, 01), third-degree (3.1% vs. 0.2%, P=0.02), more anterior perineal tears (23.1% vs. 2.5%, P<0.01), increased duration of pushing efforts (13 min vs. 10 min, P=0.05) and greater blood loss (297 cc vs. 165 cc, P<0.01) in the group with a history of FGM. There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The obstetrical prognosis of patients with a history of FGM is significantly poorer. Neonatal prognosis remains unchanged.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Circumcision, Female , Delivery, Obstetric , Perineum , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Female , Circumcision, Female/adverse effects , Circumcision, Female/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Adult , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Prognosis , Perineum/injuries , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data , Extraction, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology
8.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 294: 39-42, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211455

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are feared perineal injuries that are associated with increased pelvic floor disorders. The knowledge of influencing factors as the mode of delivery is therefore important. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in primiparae after water and bed deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study 3907 primiparae gave birth in water or on a bed in a Swiss teaching hospital. The diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries was confirmed by a consultant of obstetrics and gynecology and treated by them. The rates of these injuries after water and bed births were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to detect possible associative factors, such as birth weight, episiotomy, use of oxytocin in first and second stage of labor. RESULTS: 1844 (47.2 %) of the primiparae had a water delivery and 2063 (52.8 %) a bed delivery. 193 (4.94 %) were diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter injuries, of which 68 (3.7 %) had a water delivery and 125 (6.1 %) a bed delivery, p < 0.001. Subgroup analysis revealed that, in the first and second stage of labor, the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries with oxytocin was significantly lower in water than in bed deliveries; p = 0.025, p < 0.017, respectively. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the birth weight or episiotomy subgroups did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: In a teaching hospital setting with standardized labor management, primiparae with a water delivery have the lowest risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Obstetric Labor Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Oxytocin/therapeutic use , Anal Canal/injuries , Birth Weight , Switzerland/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Episiotomy , Hospitals, Public , Hospitals, Teaching , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/prevention & control , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Lacerations/prevention & control
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S991-S1004, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635056

ABSTRACT

Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous births, with a incidence of 40%. The incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is approximately 3%, with a significantly higher rate in primiparous than in multiparous women (6% vs 2%). Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is a significant risk factor for the development of anal incontinence, with approximately 10% of women developing symptoms within a year following vaginal birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries have significant medicolegal implications and contribute greatly to healthcare costs. For example, in 2013 and 2014, the economic burden of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the United Kingdom ranged between £3.7 million (with assisted vaginal birth) and £9.8 million (with spontaneous vaginal birth). In the United States, complications associated with trauma to the perineum incurred costs of approximately $83 million between 2007 and 2011. It is therefore crucial to focus on improvements in clinical care to reduce this risk and minimize the development of perineal trauma, particularly obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Identification of risk factors allows modification of obstetrical practice with the aim of reducing the rate of perineal trauma and its attendant associated morbidity. Risk factors associated with second-degree perineal trauma include increased fetal birthweight, operative vaginal birth, prolonged second stage of labor, maternal birth position, and advanced maternal age. With obstetrical anal sphincter injury, risk factors include induction of labor, augmentation of labor, epidural, increased fetal birthweight, fetal malposition (occiput posterior), midline episiotomy, operative vaginal birth, Asian ethnicity, and primiparity. Obstetrical practice can be modified both antenatally and intrapartum. The evidence suggests that in the antenatal period, perineal massage can be commenced in the third trimester of pregnancy to increase muscle elasticity and allow stretching of the perineum during birth, thereby reducing the risk of tearing or need for episiotomy. With regard to the intrapartum period, there is a growing body of evidence from the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark suggesting that the implementation of quality improvement initiatives including the training of clinicians in manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy can reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury. With episiotomy, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommends restrictive rather than routine use of episiotomy. This is particularly the case with unassisted vaginal births. However, there is a role for episiotomy, specifically mediolateral or lateral, with assisted vaginal births. This is specifically the case with nulliparous vacuum and forceps births, given that the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in these groups by 43% and 68%, respectively. However, the complications associated with episiotomy including perineal pain, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction should be acknowledged. Despite considerable research, interventions for reducing the risk of perineal trauma remain a subject of controversy. In this review article, we present the available data on the prevention of perineal trauma by describing the risk factors associated with perineal trauma and interventions that can be implemented to prevent perineal trauma, in particular obstetrical anal sphincter injury.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Obstetric Labor Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Birth Weight , Episiotomy , Parity , Parturition , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/prevention & control , Lacerations/complications , Anal Canal/injuries , Risk Factors , Perineum/injuries , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/prevention & control , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology
10.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(1): 77-84, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584704

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: How body mass index (BMI) affects pelvic floor function after a second-degree perineal laceration is unknown. The hypothesis of this study is that pelvic floor dysfunction and complications after an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration are more common in women with a higher BMI 8 weeks postpartum. METHODS: This register-based cohort study includes 10,876 primiparous women with an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration between 2014 and 2021. Data were retrieved from the Swedish Perineal Laceration Registry. Outcomes in relation to maternal BMI were urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI) and common complications attributable to the laceration. Uni- and multivariate logistic regressions were used for comparison between normal weight (BMI < 24.9, reference), overweight (25.0-29.9) and obese (≥ 30) women. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed an increased risk for UI in both overweight and obese women compared to normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.21 (CI 1.02-1.44) and 1.27 (CI 1.13-1.58) respectively. Overweight and obese women had a decreased risk for AI (aOR 0.81, CI 0.68-0.96; aOR 0.72, CI 0.57-0.90 respectively) compared with normal-weight women. No significant differences were found in the univariate analyses over BMI strata concerning complications after perineal laceration. CONCLUSIONS: Primiparous overweight and obese women report less AI and more UI than normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration. No differences were found regarding complications. These findings are new and merit further study to find potential preventive factors and interventions after a second-degree perineal laceration.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Urinary Incontinence , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Overweight/complications , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Obesity/complications , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Perineum/injuries , Risk Factors
11.
BJOG ; 131(6): 832-842, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37840230

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The impact of first stage labour duration on maternal outcomes is sparsely investigated. We aimed to study the association between a longer active first stage and maternal complications in the early postpartum period. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study. SETTING: Regions of Stockholm and Gotland, Sweden, 2008-2020. POPULATION: A cohort of 159 459 term, singleton, vertex pregnancies, stratified by parity groups. METHODS: The exposure was active first stage duration, categorised in percentiles. Poisson regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted relative risk (aRR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To investigate the effect of second stage duration on the outcome, mediation analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe perineal lacerations (third or fourth degree), postpartum infection, urinary retention and haematoma in the birth canal or ruptured sutures. RESULTS: The risks of severe perineal laceration, postpartum infection and urinary retention increased with a longer active first stage, both overall and stratified by parity group. The aRR increased with a longer active first stage, using duration of <50th percentile as the reference. In the ≥90th percentile category, the aRR for postpartum infection was 1.64 (95% CI 1.46-1.84) in primiparous women, 2.43 (95% CI 1.98-2.98) in parous women with no previous caesarean delivery (CD) and 2.33 (95% CI 1.65-3.28) in parous women with a previous CD. The proportion mediated by second stage duration was 33.4% to 36.9% for the different outcomes in primiparous women. The risk of haematoma or ruptured sutures did not increased with a longer active first stage. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing active first stage duration is associated with maternal complications in the early postpartum period.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Puerperal Infection , Urinary Retention , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Urinary Retention/etiology , Postpartum Period , Perineum/injuries , Hematoma/complications
12.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(1): 183-188, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032377

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Social media content related to patient experiences and education continues to grow. Information on how obstetric perineal lacerations are represented on social media is limited. Our goal is to characterize available social media content on obstetric perineal lacerations. METHODS: This is an IRB-exempt study using publicly available data on commonly searched topics about perineal lacerations to create a list of queries for Instagram and TikTok. The ten queries and "keyword" searches with the highest number of posts were identified from this list. The 50 most recent posts were reviewed for relevance, quality of content, and authorship. Topic-relevant posts were analyzed. RESULTS: The search yielded 427 posts on Instagram and 500 on TikTok. Instagram yielded more topic-relevant posts than TikTok (94.1% vs 44.8%). Almost 50% of posts were categorized as educational. Instagram identified more patient experience-related posts (29.6%) whereas TikTok provided more humorous content (26.3%). Patients produced 27.6% of content on Instagram and 43.3% on TikTok. Physical therapists produced 18.9% of posts on Instagram and 21.9% on TikTok. They constituted the largest group of health professionals to post overall. Physician-created educational content accounted for 10.3% of posts on Instagram and 6.0% on TikTok. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TikTok, Instagram may be a more informative social media platform for educational or patient experience-related content. Given the paucity of physician-created content and given that only half of all posts are educational, providers should encourage social media engagement for community and networking purposes, while encouraging caution with regard to cosmetic products and advertisements.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Social Media , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Educational Status , Authorship , Health Personnel
13.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(2): 319-326, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37656195

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Evidence suggests that episiotomies reduce the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs). However, there is limited evidence on the importance of episiotomy technique in this context. The primary objective of this study was to assess if an episiotomy suture angle >45° from the median line would be associated with a lower risk for OASIs at the time of OVD. METHODS: This was an ancillary study from the multicentre prospective cohort INSTRUMODA study. Of the 2,620 patients who had an OVD with a concomitant episiotomy between April 2021 and March 2022, a total of 219 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Post-suturing photographs were used to assess episiotomy characteristics. RESULTS: Based on suture angles of ≤45° and >45° the study cohort was categorized into groups A (n = 155) and B (n = 64) respectively. The groups had comparable demographic and birth-related characteristics. The mean episiotomy length was significantly longer in group A than in group B (3.21 cm vs 2.84 cm; p = 0.009). Senior obstetricians performed more acute angled episiotomies than junior residents (p = 0.016). The total prevalence of OASIS was 2.3%, with no significant difference in rate of OASI between the two study groups. Birthweight was significantly higher in OASI births (p = 0.018) and spatula-assisted births were associated with higher risk for OASIs than ventouse or forceps (p = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk for OASI at the time of OVD when the episiotomy suture angle was >45° from the median line. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to the low prevalence of OASIs in our cohort.


Subject(s)
Episiotomy , Lacerations , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Episiotomy/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , France/epidemiology , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Lacerations/prevention & control
14.
J Surg Res ; 295: 783-790, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157730

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to perform a feasibility study using real-world data from a learning health system (LHS) to describe current practice patterns of wound closure and explore differences in outcomes associated with the use of tissue adhesives and other methods of wound closure in the pediatric surgical population to inform a potentially large study. METHODS: A multi-institutional cross-sectional study was performed of a random sample of patients <18 y-old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, umbilical hernia repair, or repair of traumatic laceration from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Sociodemographic and operative characteristics were obtained from 6 PEDSnet (a national pediatric LHS) children's hospitals and OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium (a PCORnet collaboration across 14 academic health systems). Additional clinical data elements were collected via chart review. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients included, 182 (26.3%) had appendectomies, 155 (22.4%) inguinal hernia repairs, 163 (23.6%) umbilical hernia repairs, and 192 (27.8%) traumatic lacerations. Of the 500 surgical incisions, sutures with tissue adhesives were the most frequently used (n = 211, 42.2%), followed by sutures with adhesive strips (n = 176, 35.2%), and sutures only (n = 72, 14.4%). Most traumatic lacerations were repaired with sutures only (n = 127, 64.5%). The overall wound-related complication rate was 3.0% and resumption of normal activities was recommended at a median of 14 d (interquartile ranges 14-14). CONCLUSIONS: The LHS represents an efficient tool to identify cohorts of pediatric surgical patients to perform comparative effectiveness research using real-world data to support medical and surgical products/devices in children.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Hernia, Umbilical , Lacerations , Laparoscopy , Learning Health System , Tissue Adhesives , Humans , Child , Tissue Adhesives/therapeutic use , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hernia, Umbilical/surgery , Sutures , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/methods
15.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 83: e0007, 2024. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535602

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever as características clínico-epidemiológicas, técnicas cirúrgicas e resultado do tratamento das lacerações canaliculares operadas em nosso serviço. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, realizado de janeiro de 2012 a junho de 2020, considerando-se as lesões de canalículo lacrimal operadas em um serviço de referência. Dados demográficos, características das lesões, detalhes das cirurgias e resultado do tratamento foram obtidos de prontuários eletrônicos e analisados estatisticamente. Resultados: Foram incluídos 26 portadores de lesões canaliculares, com idade entre 2 e 71 anos, sendo 73,1% homens. A lesão acometia o canalículo superior em 53,9%; 80,8% pacientes procuraram pelo serviço nas primeiras 24 horas, e 46,2% tiveram a cirurgia realizada entre 24 e 72 horas após o traumatismo. Todos os pacientes tiveram intubação mono ou bicanalicular, e o tempo transcorrido entre a cirurgia e a retirada do silicone, variou de zero a 183 dias. Após a cirurgia, 21 pacientes (80,8%; p<0,05) não apresentaram complicações, 2 (7,7%) evoluíram com obstrução canalicular, 2 (7,7%) com granuloma e 1 (3,8%) com ectrópio de ponto lacrimal. Conclusão: As lesões de canalículo encontradas em nossa prática são mais comuns em crianças ou homens jovens, acometem mais o canalículo superior e as nossas condutas levam a sucesso no tratamento na maior parte dos casos. As grandes controvérsias no assunto persistem, como o tipo e o tempo de permanência do tubo de silicone na via lacrimal. Somente estudos com grandes amostras podem consolidar esses conceitos.


ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics, surgical techniques, and results of the canalicular laceration treatment at our service. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out from January 2012 to June 2020, considering canalicular injuries operated at a reference center. Demographic data, lesion characteristics, surgical details, and treatment outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records and were statistically analyzed. Results: Twenty-six cases of people with canalicular lesions aged between 2 to 71 years old were included, of whom 73.1% were men. The superior canaliculus was affected in 53.9%; 80.8% of patients searched for care within the first 24 hours, and 46.2% had the surgery performed between 24-72 hours after trauma. All patients had mono or bicanalicular intubation and the time elapsed between surgery and silicone removal ranged from 0 to 183 days. After surgery, 21 patients (80.8%, p<0.05) did not present any complications, two (7.7%) evolved with canalicular obstruction, two (7.7%) with granuloma, and one (3.8 %) with lacrimal puncta ectropion. Conclusion: In our practice, canalicular injuries are more common in children or young men, affecting mainly the superior canaliculus, and treatment success using our approach can be achieved in most of the cases. However, great controversies remain on the subject, such as type of intubation and when to remove the silicone tube from the lacrimal pathway. Larger series are required to consolidate controversial concepts.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Eye Injuries/surgery , Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Lacerations/surgery , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacrimal Apparatus/surgery , Lacrimal Apparatus/injuries , Silicones , Sutures , Stents , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Lacerations/diagnosis , Electronic Health Records , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Intubation/methods
16.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(2): 227-242, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38131640

ABSTRACT

AIM: The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has increased in the past two decades despite improved awareness of the risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence of OASIS in women with different features (instrumental delivery or other variables). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on articles reporting the incidence of OASIS. This review aims to examine the association of instrumentation and OASIS by performing a formal systematic review of the published literature. Databases used for the research were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and 'Maternity and infant care' databases. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers screened the selected articles. 2326 duplicates were removed from the total of 4907 articles. The remaining 2581 articles were screened for title and abstract. 1913 articles were excluded due to irrelevance. The remaining 300 were screened as full text. Primiparity associated with the use of forceps were the features associated with the highest incidence of OASIS in the selected articles (19.4%). OASIS in all women had an overall incidence of 3.8%. The incidence of OASIS in all women by geographical region was the highest (6.5%) in North America. CONCLUSIONS: There are various factors that impact on the incidence of OASIS and the combination of some of these, such as the use of forceps in primiparas, resulted in the highest incidence of OASIS. The lack of international consensus is limiting the improvements that can be done to reduce OASIS rates and improve best clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Obstetric Labor Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Anal Canal/injuries , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Parity , Risk Factors , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
17.
J Mother Child ; 27(1): 176-181, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37920112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we are witnessing a decrease of vaginal instrumental deliveries and continuous increase of caesarean section rate. However, proper identification of possibility of execution, indications for instrumental delivery and their skilful use may improve the broadly understood maternal and neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study is to present prevalence, risk factors, indications and outcomes of forceps deliveries among the patients at Department of Perinatology, Lodz. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Perinatology, Medical University of Lodz. The study included forceps deliveries carried out between January 2019 and December 2022. Total number of 147 cases were analysed in terms of indications for forceps delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes such as vaginal - or cervical - laceration, postpartum haemorrhage, perineal tear, newborn injuries, Apgar score, umbilical cord blood gas analysis, NICU admission and cranial ultrasound scans. RESULTS: The prevalence of forceps delivery was 2.2%. The most common indication for forceps delivery was foetal distress (81.6%). Among mothers, the most frequent complication was vaginal laceration (40.1%). Third-and fourth-degree perineal tears were not noted. Regarding neonatal outcomes, Apgar score ≥ 8 after 1st and 5th minute of life received accordingly 91.2% and 98% of newborns. Only 8.8% experienced severe birth injuries (subperiosteal haematoma, clavicle fracture). CONCLUSIONS: Although foetal distress is the most common indication for forceps delivery, the vast majority of newborns were born in good condition and did not require admission to NICU. Taking into consideration high efficacy and low risk of neonatal and maternal complications, forceps should remain in modern obstetrics.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Lacerations , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Fetal Distress/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Obstetrical Forceps/adverse effects
18.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 172: 111639, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37478789

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dog bite injuries occur in approximately 102 of every 100,000 population. Pediatric facial injuries due to dog bites are more common than in the adult largely due to height difference and ease of access for the dog to the head and neck region. Although majority are soft tissue injuries, pediatric facial fractures from dog bites are estimated at approximately 5%, with the true incidence unknown. We hypothesize that depth and facial subsite of laceration can indicate likelihood of facial fracture presence in pediatric patients with dog bite injuries. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study included 162 patients 18 years or younger (n = 162) who had an ICD-9 code of E906.0 or ICD-10 code of W54.0 for dog bites in the head and neck region between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019 and were treated in the emergency department by either an emergency department, otolaryngology, or plastics surgery provider. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the association between patient age, sex, and dog size, and the outcomes: laceration depth (epidermis, dermis, muscle, bone), and facial subsite (upper, middle, lower third). RESULTS: Males had a lower laceration penetration at the epidermis level (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.19, 0.69) but a higher laceration penetration at the muscle level (aOR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.04, 5.04) compared to females. No significant findings were observed for the levels of dermis and bone. In the multivariable analysis, there were no significant associations to suggest facial fractures found between facial subsites and age, sex and dog size. CONCLUSION: No significant associations between depth or facial subsite of facial injury from dog bites and the presence of facial fractures in pediatric patients except with regard to male sex and laceration level of epidermis and muscle.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Facial Injuries , Lacerations , Skull Fractures , Soft Tissue Injuries , Animals , Dogs , Female , Male , Bites and Stings/complications , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Facial Injuries/etiology , Incidence , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/etiology , Skull Fractures/complications , Soft Tissue Injuries/etiology , Soft Tissue Injuries/complications , Humans , Child , Adolescent
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(8): 101047, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37277090

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Between 53% and 79% of women will sustain some degree of perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations are known as obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Timely diagnosis and prompt treatment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries can help to prevent the development of severe consequences like fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and rectovaginal fistula. Neonatal head circumference is routinely measured postpartum but is often not mentioned as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in clinical guidelines. Thus far, no review article on the risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries has discussed the role of neonatal head circumference. This study aimed to review and analyze the relationship between head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries among previous studies to conclude whether head circumference should be recognized as an important risk factor. DATA SOURCES: Through study screening on Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct for articles published between 2013 to 2023, followed by assessment of eligibility, this study ended up reviewing 25 studies, 17 of which were included in the meta-analysis. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies that reported both the neonatal head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries were included in this review. METHODS: The included studies were appraised using the Dartmouth Library risk of bias assessment checklist. Qualitative synthesis was based on the study population, findings, adjusted confounding factors, and suggested causative links in each study. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using calculation and pooling of odds ratios and inverse variance using Review Manager 5.4.1. RESULTS: A statistically significant association between head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injuries was reported in 21 of 25 studies; 4 studies reported that head circumference was a true independent risk factor. A meta-analysis of the studies that reported neonatal head circumference as a dichotomous categorical variable with a cutoff point of 35±1 cm yielded statistically significant pooled results (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.04). CONCLUSION: The risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries increased as the neonatal head circumference increased-this should be considered in decision-making during labor and postpartum management to attain the best outcome.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal , Lacerations , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Anal Canal/injuries , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Lacerations/diagnosis , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Risk Factors , Postpartum Period
20.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 26(5): 612-616, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357478

ABSTRACT

Background: Traumatic injuries to the orofacial region are common and can be challenging to the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. The tongue is one of the structures that can be involved; however, the incidence of this injury to the tongue appears rare. Most of the reported work on this topic is on children. Patients and Methods: This is a three-year prospective study of traumatic tongue lacerations managed at the oral and maxillofacial centers of two tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Nigeria. Result: A total of 37 cases with tongue lacerations among 353 patients with oral and maxillofacial trauma constituting a prevalence of 10.5%. Their age ranged from 6 months to 57 years with a mean of 18.4 years (standard deviation 17.5). Twenty three (62.2%) are males and 14 (37.8%) females in a ratio of 1.6:1. The duration of injury on presentation ranged from 45 minutes to 96 hours with a mean duration of 26.7 hours. Majority of the laceration occurred in the anterior part of the tongue (24) (64.9%). Thirteen falls (35.1%) and nine motor vehicle accidents (24.3%) were the most common etiology. Thirty six (97.3%) were sutured primarily on presentation while only one (2.7%) was delayed before closure. Anesthesia was achieved with only Local Anesthetic agent in 18 (48.6%) cases, whereas in 13 (35.1%) cases a combination of Local Anesthetic agent and sedation. Conclusion: Tongue lacerations are not very common in the southeast of Nigeria, and management in children may require sedation. Treatment could involve suturing the wound or being left alone to heal.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Soft Tissue Injuries , Child , Male , Female , Humans , Infant , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Nigeria/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Local , Tongue
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...