Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(1): 41-49, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lanolin is often included when patch testing for common contact allergens. The clinical relevance of a positive patch test reaction to lanolin markers is, however, still a subject for debate. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Amerchol L101 as a marker of lanolin allergy and investigate the clinical impact of lanolin-containing moisturizers on healthy and damaged skin using the repeated open application test (ROAT). METHODS: Twelve test subjects and 14 controls were patch tested with Amerchol L 101 and additional lanolin markers. Subsequently, a blinded ROAT was performed on the arms of the study participants for 4 weeks. Each participant applied a lanolin-free cream base and two different lanolin-containing test creams twice daily on one arm with intact skin and on the other arm with irritant dermatitis, induced by sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). RESULTS: Eleven test subjects (92%) had positive patch test reactions to Amerchol L 101 when retested and one test subject (8%) had a doubtful reaction. None of the study participants had any skin reactions to the ROAT on intact skin and all participants healed during the ROAT on damaged skin. CONCLUSIONS: Lanolin-containing emollients do not cause or worsen existing dermatitis when performing ROAT in volunteers patch test positive to Amerchol L101.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Patch Tests/methods , Skin Cream/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Dermatitis, Irritant/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Lanolin/adverse effects , Skin Cream/chemistry
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(5): 298-303, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing. OBJECTIVES: To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested between 2016 and 2017 was performed. Patients were eligible if they had been tested with lanolin alcohol 30% pet., Amerchol L101 50% pet., and a supplementary series containing other lanolin derivatives. Lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 were tested in duplicate. RESULTS: Of 594 patients, 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1%-32.3%) had a positive patch test reaction to at least one lanolin derivative. Reactions to lanolin alcohol (14.7%, 95%CI: 11.3%-18.2%) and Amerchol L101 (15.0%, 95%CI: 11.5%-18.5%) were common in the routinely tested series. Reactions to other test preparations were significantly less frequent (P < 0.05). The addition of Amerchol L101 to lanolin alcohol significantly increased the number of positive cases (odds ratio 1.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 is effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Routinely testing with other lanolin derivatives may not be worthwhile, as it detects only a few additional patients.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Lanolin/adverse effects , Patch Tests/methods , Adult , Alcohols/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Female , Humans , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Int J Toxicol ; 37(1_suppl): 19S-27S, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29761732

ABSTRACT

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) assessed the safety of 39 polyether lanolin ingredients as used in cosmetics. These ingredients function mostly as hair conditioning agents, skin conditioning agent-emollients, and surfactant-emulsifying agents. The Panel reviewed available animal and clinical data, from previous CIR safety assessments of related ingredients and components. The similar structure, properties, functions, and uses of these ingredients enabled grouping them and using the available toxicological data to assess the safety of the entire group. The Panel concluded that these polyether lanolin ingredients are safe in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Lanolin/adverse effects , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Humans , Lanolin/chemistry
6.
Dermatitis ; 26(1): 49-59, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is an important diagnostic tool for assessment of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVE: This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch-testing results from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012. METHODS: At 12 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends analyzed using χ statistics. RESULTS: Four thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients were tested; of these, 2705 patients (63.8%) had at least 1 positive reaction, and 2029 (48.0%) were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of ACD. Four hundred eight patients (9.6%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 7532 positive allergic reactions. As compared with previous reporting periods (2009-2010 and 2000-2010), positive reaction rates statistically increased for 6 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (5.0%; risk ratios [RRs]: 2.01 [1.60-2.52], 1.87 [1.61-2.18]), lanolin alcohol (4.6%; RRs 1.83 [1.45-2.30], 2.10 [1.79-2.47]), cinnamic aldehyde (3.9%; 1.69 [1.32-2.15], 1.53 [1.28-1.82]), glutaral (1.5%; 1.67 [1.13-2.48], 1.31 [1.00-1.71]), paraben mix (1.4%; 1.77 [1.16-2.69], 1.44 [1.09-1.92]), and fragrance mix I (12.1%; RRs 1.42 [1.25-1.61], 1.24 [1.14-1.36]). Compared with the previous decade, positivity rates for all formaldehyde-releasing preservatives significantly decreased (formaldehyde 6.6%; RR, 0.82 [0.73, 0.93]; quaternium-15 6.4% RR 0.75 [0.66, 0.85]; diazolidinyl urea 2.1%; RR, 0.67 [0.54, 0.84]; imidazolidinyl urea 1.6%, 0.60 [0.47, 0.77]; bronopol 1.6%; RR, 0.60 [0.46, 0.77]; DMDM hydantoin 1.6%; RR, 0.59 [0.54, 0.84]). Approximately a quarter of patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to a non-NACDG allergen. In addition, approximately one-fourth to one-third of reactions detected by NACDG allergens would have been hypothetically missed by T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark). CONCLUSIONS: These data document the beginning of the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinones in North America, which has been well documented in Europe. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational ACD.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Patch Tests , Acrolein/adverse effects , Acrolein/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Formaldehyde/adverse effects , Glutaral/adverse effects , Humans , Hydantoins/adverse effects , Lanolin/adverse effects , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Male , Methenamine/adverse effects , Methenamine/analogs & derivatives , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Parabens/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Prevalence , Propylene Glycols/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Young Adult
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 65(4): 208-12, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21504435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis in children is less recognized than in adults. However, recently, allergic contact dermatitis has started to attract more interest as a cause of or contributor to eczema in children, and patch testing has been gaining in recognition as a useful diagnostic tool in this group. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to investigate the results of patch testing of selected children with eczema of various types (mostly atopic dermatitis) attending the Sheffield Children's Hospital, and to assess potential allergens that might elicit allergic contact dermatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed retrospectively the patch test results in 110 children aged between 2 and 18 years, referred to a contact dermatitis clinic between April 2002 and December 2008. We looked at the percentages of relevant positive reactions in boys and girls, by age groups, and recorded the outcome of treatment following patch testing. RESULTS: One or more positive allergic reactions of current or past relevance was found in 48/110 children (44%; 29 females and 19 males). There were 94 allergy-positive patch test reactions in 110 patients: 81 had a reaction of current or past relevance, 12 had a reaction of unknown relevance, and 1 had reaction that was a cross-reaction. The commonest allergens with present or past relevance were medicaments, plant allergens, house dust mite, nickel, Amerchol® L101 (a lanolin derivative), and 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol. However, finding a positive allergen was not associated with a better clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that patch testing can identify relevant allergens in 44% of children with eczema. The commonest relevant allergens were medicament allergens, plant allergens, house dust mite, nickel, Amerchol® L101, and 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol. Patch testing can be performed in children as young as 2 years with the proper preparation.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Eczema/diagnosis , Patch Tests , Adolescent , Allergens , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/complications , Eczema/etiology , Female , Humans , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Male , Nickel , Propylene Glycols/adverse effects , Pyroglyphidae , Retrospective Studies
8.
Polim Med ; 37(2): 33-50, 2007.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17957947

ABSTRACT

Research was conducted into the properties and identity of the products of Croda-type hypoallergenic lanolin, which were obtained with the use of a selective catalyst (K-4) and a standard alkaline catalyst (Na/NaOH). The 1HNMR method was employed to assess the content of oxyethylated segments and the analytic level of hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB). Surface activity of products soluble in water with n(TE) > or = 40 was examined and the thermodynamic potential for micelle formation deltaGm(o) was calculated. Basic viscosity and hydrodynamic values were determined for the solubilizers and their micellar adduct with ibuprofen, ketoprofen and naproxen. In addition, the amount of solubilized therapeutic agents c/s/ was examined by means of the spectroscopic method and the micellar partition coefficient--Kw(m) was estimated. The results obtained in the course of research served as a basis for determining the solubilization mechanism and the stability of the micellar adduct for the purpose of application. This enabled the commencement of technological work on the design and manufacture of a model dosage form administered to the skin and containing the products of lanolin oxyethylation.


Subject(s)
Ethylenes/chemistry , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Models, Chemical , Solutions/chemistry , Surface-Active Agents/chemistry , Administration, Cutaneous , Algorithms , Catalysis , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Excipients , Ibuprofen/chemistry , Ketoprofen/chemistry , Lanolin/administration & dosage , Lanolin/chemistry , Lanolin/standards , Naproxen/chemistry , Pharmaceutical Vehicles , Solubility , Structure-Activity Relationship , Thermodynamics , Viscosity , Water
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 5(6): 392-7, 1979 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-527332

ABSTRACT

A staged histological study of skin changes induced in rabbits by daily application of five bases used for topical medicaments and cosmetics, namely glycols, petrolatum, Modulan, Acetulan and Amerchol L 101, over periods of 100 days, is reported. Sections obtained every 10 days were examined for changes in the epithelium, in the character of the dermal infiltrate and in the superficial collagen fibers. Glycols showed no particular effects on the skin; petrolatum produced acanthosis and vacuolization in the epidermis, and mononuclear cell infiltration of the dermis but evident collagen changes. Lanolin derivatives produced acanthosis and vacuolization of the epidermis, with lymphomonouclear infiltration of the dermis and with dissociation of collagen; examination around the 30th day showed a tendency to basal layer disorganization by the infiltrate.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/pharmacology , Glycols/pharmacology , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Petrolatum/pharmacology , Skin/pathology , Animals , Dermatitis, Contact/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Contact/pathology , Ethylene Glycols/pharmacology , Female , Lanolin/pharmacology , Propylene Glycols/pharmacology , Rabbits , Skin/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...