Virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopic surgery - does it really matter, what simulator to use? Results of a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulation training plays a crucial role in modern surgical training, as it facilitates trainees to carry out surgical procedures or parts of it without the need for training "on the patient". However, there are no data comparing different commercially available high-end virtual reality simulators. METHODS: Trainees of an international gastrointestinal surgery workshop practiced in different sequences on LaparoS® (VirtaMed), LapSim® (Surgical Science) and LapMentor III® (Simbionix) eight comparable exercises, training the same basic laparoscopic skills. Simulator based metrics were compared between an entrance and exit examination. RESULTS: All trainees significantly improved their basic laparoscopic skills performance, regardless of the sequence in which they used the three simulators. Median path length was initially 830 cm and 463 cm on the exit examination (p < 0.001), median time taken improved from 305 to 167 s (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All Simulators trained efficiently the same basic surgery skills, regardless of the sequence or simulator used. Virtual reality simulation training, regardless of the simulator used, should be incorporated in all surgical training programs. To enhance comparability across different types of simulators, standardized outcome metrics should be implemented.

Effect of three training programs on surgical performance in single-port laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three training methodologies on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), using straight and articulating instruments. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with subjects randomly divided into three groups, who performed a specific training for 12 days using three laparoscopic tasks in a laparoscopic simulator. Group-A trained in conventional laparoscopy setting using straight instruments and in LESS setting using both straight and articulating instruments. Group-B trained in LESS setting using straight and articulating instruments, whereas Group-C trained in LESS setting using articulating instruments. Participants' performance was recorded with a video-tracking system and evaluated with 12 motion analysis parameters (MAPs). RESULTS: All groups obtained significant differences in their performance in most of the MAPs. Group-C showed an improvement in nine MAPs, with a high level of technical competence. Group-A presented a marked improvement in bimanual dexterity skills. CONCLUSIONS: Training in LESS surgery using articulating laparoscopic instruments improves the quality of skills and allows smoother learning curves.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el efecto de tres métodos de entrenamiento en la adquisición de habilidades psicomotrices para la cirugía laparoendoscópica por puerto único (LESS, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery) utilizando instrumental recto y articulado. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo con sujetos divididos aleatoriamente en tres grupos, quienes realizaron un entrenamiento específico durante 12 días utilizando tres tareas laparoscópicas en un simulador laparoscópico. El grupo A entrenó en el entorno laparoscópico convencional con instrumentos rectos, y en el entorno LESS con instrumentos rectos y articulados. El grupo B entrenó en el entorno LESS con instrumentos rectos y articulados. El Grupo C entrenó en el entorno LESS con instrumentos articulados. El desempeño de los participantes se registró con un sistema de seguimiento en video y fue evaluado con 12 parámetros de análisis de movimiento (MAP, motion analysis parameters). RESULTADOS: Todos los grupos obtuvieron diferencias significativas en su desempeño para la mayoría de los MAP. El grupo C mostró una mejora en nueve MAP, con un alto nivel de competencia técnica. El grupo A mostró una marcada mejora en la habilidad de destreza bimanual. CONCLUSIONES: El entrenamiento en cirugía LESS con instrumentos articulados mejora la calidad de las habilidades adquiridas y permite curvas de aprendizaje más suaves.

The SAGES MASTERS program bariatric surgery pathway selects 10 seminal publications on adjustable gastric banding.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is one of the clinical pathways of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program, and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is one of the three anchoring bariatric procedures. To improve surgeon lifelong learning, the Masters Program seeks to identify sentinel articles of each of the 3 bariatric anchoring procedures. In this article, we present the top 10 articles on LAGB. METHODS: A systematic literature search of papers on LAGB was completed, and publications with the most citations and citation index were selected and shared with SAGES Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Committee members for review. The individual committee members then ranked these papers, and the top 10 papers were chosen based on the composite ranking. RESULTS: The top 10 sentinel publications on LAGB contributed substantially to the body of literature related to the procedure, whether for surgical technique, novel information, or outcome analysis. A summary of each paper including expert appraisal and commentary is presented here. CONCLUSION: These seminal articles have had significant contribution to our understanding and appreciation of the LAGB procedure. Bariatric surgeons should use this resource to enhance their continual education and acquisition of specialized skills.

Laparoscopic vs robotic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of learning curves and skill transference in general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether laparoscopic experience should be a prerequisite for robotic training. Further, there is limited information on skill transference between laparoscopic and robotic techniques. This study focused on the general surgery residents' learning curve and skill transference within the two minimally invasive platforms. METHODS: General surgery residents were observed during the performance of laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repairs. The recorded data included objective measures (operative time, resident participation indicated by percent active time on console or laparoscopy relative to total case time, number of handoffs between the resident and attending), and subjective evaluations (preceptor and trainee assessments of operative performance) while controlling for case complexity, patient comorbidities, and residents' prior operative experience. Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Pearson Correlation coefficients were used for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty laparoscopic and forty-four robotic cases were observed. Mean operative times were 90 min for robotic and 95 min for laparoscopic cases (P = 0.4590). Residents' active participation time was 66% on the robotic platform and 37% for laparoscopic (P = < 0.0001). On average, hand-offs occurred 9.7 times during robotic cases and 6.3 times during laparoscopic cases (P = 0.0131). The mean number of cases per resident was 5.86 robotic and 1.67 laparoscopic (P = 0.0312). For robotic cases, there was a strong correlation between percent active resident participation and their prior robotic experience (r = 0.78) while there was a weaker correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.47). On the other hand, prior robotic experience had minimal correlation with the percent active resident participation in laparoscopic cases (r = 0.12) and a weak correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The robotic platform may be a more effective teaching tool with a higher degree of entrustability indicated by the higher mean resident participation. We observed a greater degree of skill transference from laparoscopy to the robot, indicated by a higher degree of correlation between the resident's prior laparoscopic experience and the percent console time in robotic cases. There was minimal correlation between residents' prior robotic experience and their participation in laparoscopic cases. Our findings suggest that the learning curve for the robot may be shorter as prior robotic experience had a much stronger association with future robotic performance compared to the association observed in laparoscopy.

Dyadic practice for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills (DALS)-A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic simulation is integral to surgical education but requires significant resources. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of dyadic practice (DP), involving two individuals working together, to individual practice (IP) for novices acquiring laparoscopic skills and assess their learning experience. METHODS: We conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial comparing DP and IP for novice medical students who completed a laparoscopic simulation workshop. Participants were assessed individually pre-course (test 1), post-course (test 2), and 8-week retention (test 3) using a validated quantitative method. A post-course questionnaire and interview, analyzed with thematic analysis, assessed the learning experience. RESULTS: In total, 31 DP and 35 IP participants completed the study. There was no difference in mean scores between DP and IP groups in all three tests: test 1 (p = 0.55), test 2 (p = 0.26), test 3 (p = 0.35). In trend analysis, the DP group improved post-course (test 1 vs. 2: p = 0.02) and maintained this level at the retention test (2 vs. 3: p = 0.80, 1 vs. 3: p = 0.02). Whilst the IP group also improved post-course (test 1 vs. 2: p < 0.001), this improvement was not retained (2 vs. 3: p = 0.003, 1 vs. 3: p = 0.32). Thematic analysis revealed that DP participants valued peer support, peer feedback and observation time, but also acknowledged the limitations of reduced practical time and issues with teamwork. CONCLUSION: DP is non-inferior to IP for novices learning laparoscopic skills, is well received and may lead to superior long-term skill retention.

Learning Curve of a Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Program at a Second Institution.

BACKGROUND: Historically, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been performed via a laparotomy, but increasingly, laparoscopic and robotic platforms are being employed for PD. Laparoscopic PD has a steep surgeon specific learning curve and programmatic elements that must be optimized. These factors may limit a surgeon who is proficient at laparoscopic PD to develop a program at another institution. We hypothesize that the learning curve for a surgeon transferring a program to a second institution is shorter than the initial laparoscopic PD learning curve for the same surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic PD for any indication at the first institution (FI) from 2012 to 2017 and the second institution (SI) from 2018 to 2021 was conducted. Standard statistical analysis was performed. The learning curve was identified using one-sided CUSUM analysis of operative times. RESULT: We identified 110 participants, 90 from the FI and 20 from the SI. More patients at the FI were diagnosed with periampullary adenocarcinoma on final pathology compared to the SI (65.6% vs 40.0%, P = .0132). FI operative times stabilized after the 25th laparoscopic PD and SI operative times stabilized after the 5th operation. No statistically significant difference was identified in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve and average operative time of an SI laparoscopic PD program was shorter than the initial learning curve for a single surgeon with comparable outcomes. This suggests that complex minimally invasive surgical programs can be safely transferred to another high-volume institution without significant loss of progress.

Expanded Access to Video-Based Laparoscopic Skills Assessments: Ease, Reliability, and Accuracy.

OBJECTIVE: Video-based performance assessments provide essential feedback to surgical residents, but in-person and remote video-based assessment by trained proctors incurs significant cost. We aimed to determine the reliability, accuracy, and difficulty of untrained attending staff surgeon raters completing video-based assessments of a basic laparoscopic skill. Secondarily, we aimed to compare reliability and accuracy between 2 different types of assessment tools. DESIGN: An anonymous survey was distributed electronically to surgical attendings via a national organizational listserv. Survey items included demographics, rating of video-based assessment experience (1 = have never completed video-based assessments, 5 = often complete video-based assessments), and rating of favorability toward video-based and in-person assessments (0 = not favorable, 100 = favorable). Participants watched 2 laparoscopic peg transfer performances, then rated each performance using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) form and the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS). Participants then rated assessment completion ease (1 = Very Easy, 5 = Very Difficult). SETTING: National survey of practicing surgeons. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one surgery attendings with experience in laparoscopic surgery from 10 institutions participated as untrained raters. Six experienced laparoscopic skills proctors participated as expert raters. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was substantial for both OSATS (k = 0.75) and MISTELS (k = 0.85). MISTELS accuracy was significantly higher than that of OSATS (κ: MISTELS = 0.18, 95%CI = [0.06,0.29]; OSATS = 0.02, 95%CI = [-0.01,0.04]). While participants were inexperienced with completing video-based assessments (median = 1/5), they perceived video-based assessments favorably (mean = 73.4) and felt assessment completion was "Easy" on average. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that faculty raters untrained in simulation-based assessments can successfully complete video-based assessments of basic laparoscopic skills with substantial inter-rater reliability without marked difficulty. These findings suggest an opportunity to increase access to feedback for trainees using video-based assessment of fundamental skills in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic but not open surgical skills can be transferred to robot-assisted surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With an increase in robot-assisted surgery across all specialties, adequate training and credentialing strategies need to be identified to ensure patients safety. The meta-analysis assesses the transferability of technical surgical skills between laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, and robot-assisted surgery. DESIGN: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Outcomes were categorized into time, process, product, and composite outcome measures and pooled separately using Hedges'g (standardized mean difference [SMD]). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of study design, virtual reality platforms and task difficulty. RESULTS: Out of 14,120 screened studies, 30 were included in the qualitative synthesis and 26 in the quantitative synthesis. Technical surgical skill transfer was demonstrated from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery (composite: SMD 0.40, 95%-confidence interval [CI] [0.19; 0.62], time: SMD 0.62, CI [0.33; 0.91]) and vice versa (composite: SMD 0.66, CI [0.33; 0.99], time [basic skills]: SMD 0.36, CI [0.01; 0.72]). No skill transfer was seen from open to robot-assisted surgery with limited available data. CONCLUSION: Technical surgical skills can be transferred from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery and vice versa. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgical skills training and credentialing should not be regarded separately, but a reasonable combination could shorten overall training times and increase efficiency. Previous experience in open surgery should not be considered as an imperative prerequisite for training in robot-assisted surgery. Recommendations for studies assessing skill transfer are proposed to increase comparability and significance of future studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018104507.

Trends in minimally invasive and open inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of ACGME general surgery case logs.

BACKGROUND: Groin hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures and is often performed by surgical interns and junior residents. While traditionally performed open, minimally invasive (MIS) groin hernia repair has become an increasingly popular approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the trends in MIS and open inguinal and femoral hernia repair in general surgery residency training over the past two decades. METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) national case log data of general surgery residents from 1999 through 2022 were reviewed. We collected means and standard deviations of open and MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs. Linear regression and ANOVA were used to identify trends in the average annual number of open and MIS hernia repairs logged by residents. Cases were distinguished between level of resident trainees: surgeon-chief (SC) and surgeon-junior (SJ). RESULTS: From July 1999 to June 2022, the average annual MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly increased, from 7.6 to 47.9 cases (p < 0.001), and the average annual open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly decreased, from 51.9 to 39.7 cases (p < 0.001). SJ resident results were consistent with this overall trend. For SC residents, the volume of both MIS and open hernia repairs significantly increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACGME case log data indicates a trend of general surgery residents logging overall fewer numbers of open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs, and a larger proportion of open repairs by chief residents. This trend warrants attention and further study as it may represent a skill or knowledge gap with significant impact of surgical training.

Optimizing laparoscopic and robotic skills through simulation in participants with limited or no prior experience: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is an innovative tool for developing complex skills required for surgical training. The objective of this study was to determine the advancement of laparoscopic and robotic skills through simulation in participants with limited or no previous experience. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. We conducted searches using MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Variables analyzed were study characteristics, participant demographics, and characteristics of the learning program. Our main measures were effectiveness, surgical time, and errors. These were reported using standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI (P < .05). Secondary measures included skill transfer and learning curve. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs were included and comprised 619 participants: 354 participants (57%) were in the simulation group and 265 (43%) in the control group. Results indicated that laparoscopic simulation effectively enhanced surgical skills (SMD, 0.59 [0.18-1]; P = .004) and was significantly associated with shorter surgical duration (SMD, -1.08 [-1.57 to -0.59]; P < .0001) and a fewer errors made (SMD, -1.91 [-3.13 to -0.70]; P = .002). In the robotic simulation, there was no difference in effectiveness (SMD, 0.17 [-0.19 to 0.52]; P = .36) or surgical time (SMD, 0.27 [-0.86 to 1.39]; P = .64). Furthermore, skills were found to be transferable from simulation to a real-life operating room (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Simulation is an effective tool for optimizing laparoscopic skills, even in participants with limited or no previous experience. This approach not only contributes to the reduction of surgical time and errors but also facilitates the transfer of skills to the surgical environment. In contrast, robotic simulation fails to maximize skill development, requiring previous experience in laparoscopy to achieve optimal levels of effectiveness.

[Experience of Introduction of Robotic-Assist Surgery at Regional Hospital].

Our hospital introduced the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in April 2022. At the same time, laparoscopic surgery was also introduced to produce endoscopic surgical skill qualification system: qualified surgeon. Open surgery for trainees was also continued as before, and young surgeons were instructed to always keep their motivation high. After the introduction of robotic surgery, conferences that were accessible to trainees were held on a regular basis. In addition, the environment was designed to allow anyone to train da Vinci Surgical System. The introduction of robotic surgery has certainly reduced the number of procedures performed by trainees, especially in rectal cancer. However, surgical outcomes were better after the introduction of robotic surgery. The trend was similar for both open and laparoscopic surgery. We report on our efforts to introduce robot-assisted surgery and the actual situation in which surgeons at various stages of their education can work together to achieve a win-win situation.

Trends in gastric surgery operative experience among general surgery residents in the United States: A nationwide retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastric surgery is a crucial component of general surgery training. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data on operative volume and the diversity of surgical procedures that general surgery residents are exposed to. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from the American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited program from 2009 to 2022. Data on the mean number of gastric procedures, including the mean in each subcategory, were retrieved. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in operative volume. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2022, the mean overall logged gastric procedures rose significantly (τ = 0.722, P < .001) from 36.2 in 2009 to 49.2 in 2022 (35.9% increase). The most substantial growth was seen in laparoscopic gastric reduction for morbid obesity (mean 1.9 in 2017 to 19 in 2022; τ = 0.670, P = .009). A statistically significant increase was also seen in laparoscopic partial gastric resections, repair of gastric perforation, and "other major stomach procedures" (P < .05 for all comparisons). Open gastrostomy, open partial gastric resections, and open vagotomy all significantly decreased (P < .05 for all comparisons). There was no significant change in the volume of laparoscopic gastrectomy, total gastric resections, and non-laparoscopic gastric reductions for morbid obesity (P > .05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: There has been a substantial increase in the volume of gastric surgery during residency over the past 14 years, driven mainly by an increase in laparoscopic gastric reduction. However, there may still be a need for further gastric surgical training to ensure well-rounded general surgeons.

Simulation training of laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis with a three-dimensional-printed model leads to better skill transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: A new simulation model and training curriculum for laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis has been developed. Currently, this concept lacks evidence for the transfer of skills from simulation to clinical settings. This study was conducted to determine whether training with a three-dimensional (3D) bilioenteric anastomosis model result in greater transfer of skills than traditional training methods involving video observation and a general suture model. METHODS: Fifteen general surgeons with no prior experience in laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis were included in this study and randomised into three training groups: video observation only, practice using a general suture model, and practice using a 3D-printed biliary-enteric anastomosis model. Following five training sessions, each surgeon was asked to perform a laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis procedure on an isolated swine organ model. The operative time and performance scores of the procedure were recorded and compared among the three training groups. RESULTS: The operation time in the 3D-printed model group was significantly shorter than the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.040). Furthermore, the performance score of the 3D-printed model group was significantly higher than those of the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.001). Finally, the goal score for laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis in the isolated swine organ model was significantly higher in the 3D model group than in the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of a novel 3D-printed model for simulation training in laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis facilitates improved skill acquisition and transferability to an animal setting compared with traditional training techniques.

Use of Simulation For Training Advanced Colorectal Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Simulation training for minimally invasive colorectal procedures is in developing stages. This study aims to assess the impact of simulation on procedural knowledge and simulated performance in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR) and robotic right colectomy (RRC). DESIGN: LLAR and RRC simulation procedures were designed using human cadaveric models. Resident case experience and simulation selfassessments scores for operative ability and knowledge were collected before and after the simulation. Colorectal faculty assessed resident simulation performance using validated assessment scales (OSATS-GRS, GEARS). Paired t-tests, unpaired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and descriptive statistics were applied in analyses. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Senior general surgery residents at large academic surgery program. RESULTS: Fifteen PGY4/PGY5 general surgery residents participated in each simulation. Mean LLAR knowledge score increased overall from 10.0 ±  2.0 to 11.5  ±  1.6 of 15 points (p = 0.0018); when stratified, this increase remained significant for the PGY4 cohort only. Mean confidence in ability to complete LLAR increased overall from 2.0 ±  0.8 to 2.8  ± 0.9 on a 5-point rating scale (p = 0.0013); when stratified, this increase remained significant for the PGY4 cohort only. Mean total OSATS GRS score was 28  ±  6.3 of 35 and had strong positive correlation with previous laparoscopic colorectal experience (r = 0.64, p = 0.0092). Mean RRC knowledge score increased from 9.4 ±  2.2 to 11.1 ±  1.5 of 15 points (p = 0.0030); when stratified, this increase again remained significant for the PGY4 cohort only. Mean confidence in ability to complete RRC increased from 1.9 ±  0.9 to 3.2  ±  1.1 (p = 0.0002) and was significant for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees require opportunities to practice advanced minimally invasive colorectal procedures. Our simulation approach promotes increased procedural knowledge and resident confidence and offers a safe complement to live operative experience for trainee development. In the future, simulations will target trainees on the earlier part of the learning curve and be paired with live operative assessments to characterize longitudinal skill progression.

Development and assessment of a loop ligation simulator for laparoscopic appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Loop ligation of the appendix is a challenging surgical skill and well suited to be trained in a simulator. We aimed to develop an affordable and easy-to-build simulator and test its training effect. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Different materials were tested, and the best training modality was identified by researching the literature. The developed simulator training was tested on 20 surgical novices. RESULTS: A video was produced including an instruction on how to build the simulator and a step-by-step tuition on how to ligate the appendix. The Peyton approach was utilized to guide learners. Training with the simulator leads to reliable skill acquisition. All participants improved significantly in completing the task successfully during the structured learning. CONCLUSION: We succeeded in developing a simulator for loop ligation of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Participants significantly improve in handling the loops. The transferability of the skill learned during simulation to the operating room will be subject of a follow-up study.

Clinical decision rules for appendicitis are not used by surgeons in training: A survey.

BACKGROUNDS: We aimed to investigate surgeons in training knowledge of clinical decision rules (CDR) for diagnosing appendicitis and their attitudes toward implementing them. METHODS: We included surgeons in training practicing in East Denmark who independently could decide to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. The survey was developed in Research Electronic Data Capture and face-validated before use. It consisted of three parts: (1) the characteristics of the surgeons, (2) their diagnostic approach, and (3) their knowledge and attitude toward introducing CDR in the clinic. Data were collected in January 2023. RESULTS: We achieved 83 (90%) responses, and 52% of surgeons in training believed that appendicitis was difficult to diagnose. Their diagnostic approach mostly included symptoms and physical examinations for abdominal pain, and C-reactive protein. A total of 48% knew of at least one clinical decision rule, and 72% had never used a clinical decision rule. Regarding the necessity of CDR in clinical practice, surgeons in training options were divided into thirds: not needed, neither needed nor not needed, and needed. Surgeons in training indicated that CDR needed to be validated and easily applied before they would implement them. CONCLUSION: Approximately 3/4 of surgeons in training had never utilized a clinical decision rule to diagnose appendicitis, and only half knew of their existence. The symptoms and findings incorporated in most CDR aligned with their diagnostic approach. They were conflicted if CDR needed to be implemented in clinical practice.

Can Computerized Simulation be Used to Assess Surgical Proficiency in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries? A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Computerized simulation (CS) of surgery in virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) settings are used to teach foundational skills, but its applicability in advanced training is to be determined. This review aims to summarize the types of CS available for laparoscopic colorectal surgery (CRS) and its utility in assessment of proficiency. METHODS: A systematic review of CS in laparoscopic CRS was done on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: Eleven relevant observational studies were identified. The most common procedure simulated was laparoscopic colectomy. Assessment using performance metrics measured by the simulator such as path length moved by laparoscopic tools, procedure time and number of discrete movements had the most consistent differentiating ability between expert and non-expert cohorts. Surgeons fared similarly in proficiency scores in assessment with CS compared to assessment with traditional cadaveric or porcine models. CONCLUSION: CS of laparoscopic CRS may be used in assessment of proficiency using performance metrics measuring economy of movement. CS may be a viable assessment tool in advanced surgical training, but further studies should assess utility of incorporating it as a formal assessment tool in training programs.

An intelligent grasper to provide real-time force feedback to shorten the learning curve in laparoscopic training.

BACKGROUND: A lack of force feedback in laparoscopic surgery often leads to a steep learning curve to the novices and traditional training system equipped with force feedback need a high educational cost. This study aimed to use a laparoscopic grasper providing force feedback in laparoscopic training which can assist in controlling of gripping forces and improve the learning processing of the novices. METHODS: Firstly, we conducted a pre-experiment to verify the role of force feedback in gripping operations and establish the safe gripping force threshold for the tasks. Following this, we proceeded with a four-week training program. Unlike the novices without feedback (Group A2), the novices receiving feedback (Group B2) underwent training that included force feedback. Finally, we completed a follow-up period without providing force feedback to assess the training effect under different conditions. Real-time force parameters were recorded and compared. RESULTS: In the pre-experiment, we set the gripping force threshold for the tasks based on the experienced surgeons' performance. This is reasonable as the experienced surgeons have obtained adequate skill of handling grasper. The thresholds for task 1, 2, and 3 were set as 0.731 N, 1.203 N and 0.938 N, respectively. With force feedback, the gripping force applied by the novices with feedback (Group B1) was lower than that of the novices without feedback (Group A1) (p < 0.005). During the training period, the Group B2 takes 6 trails to achieve gripping force of 0.635 N, which is lower than the threshold line, whereas the Group A2 needs 11 trails, meaning that the learning curve of Group B2 was significantly shorter than that of Group A2. Additionally, during the follow-up period, there was no significant decline in force learning, and Group B2 demonstrated better control of gripping operations. The training with force feedback received positive evaluations. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that using a grasper providing force feedback in laparoscopic training can help to control the gripping force and shorten the learning curve. It is anticipated that the laparoscopic grasper equipped with FBG sensor is promising to provide force feedback during laparoscopic training, which ultimately shows great potential in laparoscopic surgery.

A needs assessment for simulation in African surgical education.

INTRODUCTION: There is a critical need for comprehensive surgical training in African countries given the unmet surgical burden of disease in this region. Collaborative and progressive initiatives in global surgical education will have the greatest impact on trainees. Little is known about surgical education needs from the perspective of practicing surgeons and trainees in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Even less is known about the potential role for simulation to augment training. METHODS: A modified Delphi methodology with 2 rounds of responses was employed to survey program directors (PD) and associate program directors (APD) of Pan-African Association of Christian Surgeons (PAACS) general surgery residency programs across eight low-middle-income countries in Africa. 3 PD/APDs and 2 surgical residents participated in semi-structured interviews centered around the role of simulation in training. Descriptive analysis was performed to elicit key themes and illustrative examples. RESULTS: The survey of program directors revealed that teaching residents the psychomotor skills need to perform intracorporeal suturing was both high priority and desired in multiple training sites. Other high priority skills were laparoscopic camera driving and medial visceral rotation. The interviews revealed a specific desire to perform laparoscopic surgery and a need for a simulation curriculum to familiarize staff and trainees with laparoscopic techniques. Several barriers to laparoscopic surgery exist, such as lack of staff familiarity with the equipment, lack of public buy in, and lack of generalizable and adaptable educational modules. Trainees saw utility in the use of simulation to optimize time in the operating room and sought opportunities to improve their laparoscopic skills. CONCLUSION: Faculty and surgical trainees in LMICs have interest in learning advanced surgical techniques, such as laparoscopy. Developing a simulation curriculum tailored to the trainees' local context has the potential to fill this need.

There is a need for a paradigm shift in laparoscopic surgical training: results of a nationwide survey among teaching hospitals in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training curricula have changed little over the past decades. Current advances in surgical techniques, especially in minimally invasive surgery, as well as the rapidly changing socioeconomic environment pose a major challenge for the training of young surgeons. The aim of this survey was to provide a representative overview of the surgical training landscape in Switzerland focusing on laparoscopic surgical training: How do department chairs of teaching hospitals deal with the above challenges, and what should a future training curriculum look like? METHODS: This is a prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study among the heads of departments of all certified surgical teaching hospitals in Switzerland. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56% (48/86) and 86% (19/22) for tertiary centers. Two-thirds of the centers (32) organize themselves in training networks. Laparoscopic training courses are offered in 25 (52%) hospitals, mainly in tertiary centers. Self-training opportunities exist in 40 (83%) hospitals. In addition to commercial (27) and self-built (7) box trainers, high-fidelity trainers are available in 16 (33%) hospitals. A mandatory training curriculum exists in 7 (15%) facilities, and a training assessment is performed in 15 (31%) institutions. Thirty-two (65%) heads of departments indicated that residents have sufficient practical exposure in the operating room, but the ability to work independently with obtaining the specialist title is seen critically (71%). They state that the surgical catalog does not adequately reflect the manual skills of the resident (64%). The desire is for training to be restructured from a numbers-based to a performance-based curriculum (53%) and for tools to assess residents' manual skills (56%) to be introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Department chairs stated that the existing curriculum in Switzerland does not meet the requirements of a modern training curriculum. This study highlights the need to create an improved, competency-based curriculum that ensures the training of a new generation of surgeons, taking into account the growing evidence of the effectiveness of state-of-the-art training modalities such as simulation or proficiency-based training.