[Risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and the clinical characteristics of patients complicated with pneumonia].

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged, and to analyze the characteristics of patients with pneumonia. Methods: Patients who underwent 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring from June 2020 to July 2022 and the positive patients of those who underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring from March 2017 to July 2022 at the Second Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Positive results of 24-hour laryngopharyngeal reflux monitoring were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and the negative results were in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Patients with pneumonia and simple gastroesophageal reflux disease were in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group, and patients with pneumonia and simple laryngopharyngeal reflux disease were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group. Patients' basic data, co-morbidities, drug use and relevant examination and test results were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and its relationship with pneumonia. Results: A total of 80 patients with 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring were enrolled finally, including 34 cases, all male, aged (73±12) years, in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and 46 cases [44 males, 2 females, aged (78±11) years] in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years (OR=13.07, 95%CI: 2.53-67.68), body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.37, each additional 1 kg/m2, 95%CI: 1.03-1.83), use of antipsychotic drugs (OR=8.00, 95%CI: 1.40-45.73) and calcium channel blockers (OR=5.27, 95%CI: 1.13-24.53) (all P<0.05). The protective factors of the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included antacids (OR=0.19, 95%CI: 0.04-0.90, P=0.035). The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group compared with the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group [44.1% (15/34) vs 21.7% (10/46), P=0.033]. The esophageal reflux pneumonia group included 32 cases [31 males and 1 females, aged (84±12) years]. The laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group included 15 cases [ 15 males, aged (79±11) years]. Compared to the patients in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group, the patients in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group had a longer course of antibiotics [(27.7±27.0) vs (14.6±13.9) days, P=0.034], a higher frequency of seizure frequency [(4.3±3.0) vs (1.8±1.5) times/year, P<0.001] and a higher maximal body temperature [(38.2±0.9) vs (37.6±1.1) ℃, P=0.037]. Conclusions: The risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years, higher BMI, use of antipsychotic drugs and calcium channel blockers. The incidence of pneumonia in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is higher, but the condition of pneumonia is milder.

Ocular Surface Disease as Extraesophageal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Manifestation: A Specific Therapeutic Strategy.

PURPOSE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common gastrointestinal disorders with extraesophageal manifestations (EGERD). Studies showed a correlation between GERD/LPR and ocular discomfort. Our aim was to report the prevalence of ocular involvement in patients with GERD/LPR, describe clinical and biomolecular manifestations, and provide a treatment strategy for this novel EGERD comorbidity. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with LPR and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in this masked randomized controlled study. Fifteen naive patients with LPR were treated with magnesium alginate eye drops and oral therapy (magnesium alginate and simethicone tablets) with a 1-month follow-up. Clinical ocular surface evaluation, Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, tear sampling, and conjunctival imprints were performed. Tear pepsin levels were quantified by ELISA. Imprints were processed for human leukocyte antigen-DR isotype (HLA-DR) immunodetection and for HLA-DR, IL8, mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) transcript expression (PCR). RESULTS: Patients with LPR had significantly increased Ocular Surface Disease Index ( P < 0.05), reduced T-BUT ( P < 0.05), and higher meibomian gland dysfunction ( P < 0.001) compared with controls. After treatment, tear break-up time (T-BUT) and meibomian gland dysfunction scores improved to normal values. Pepsin concentration increased in patients with EGERD ( P = 0.01) and decreased with topical treatment ( P = 0.0025), significantly. HLA-DR, IL8, and NADPH transcripts were significantly increased in the untreated versus controls and comparable significant values were obtained after treatment ( P < 0.05). MUC5AC expression significantly increased with treatment ( P = 0.005). VIP transcripts were significantly higher in EGERD than in controls and decreased with the topical treatment ( P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in NPY. CONCLUSIONS: We report an increase in prevalence of ocular discomfort in patients with GERD/LPR. The observations of VIP and NPY transcripts demonstrate the potential neurogenic nature of the inflammatory state. Restoration of the ocular surface parameters suggests the potential usefulness of topical alginate therapy.

The Time-Point Distribution Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Elderly Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) in elderly and younger patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Analysis of data from patients with LPR-related symptoms and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-hour HEMII-pH) monitoring from February 2017 to September 2022 at Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital. METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 age groups: the elderly group (>60 years) and the younger group (≤60 years). The time series of HREs and meals within 24 hours were analyzed based on HEMII-pH. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were included (126 elderly patients). In younger patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs, the incidence of the remaining types of HREs tended to increase within 2 hours after meals, especially after dinner. The incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal was not significantly different in the elderly group (χ2 = 0.080, P = .777). The incidence of nighttime HREs in elderly patients was statistically higher than in younger patients (6.23% vs 3.96%, P = .030), particularly acid-/nonacid-liquid HREs. CONCLUSION: HREs tend to increase within 2 hours after meals in younger LPR patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs. In elderly LPR patients, the incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal were not significantly different, and nighttime fluid HREs was more prone to occur than in younger patients.

Self-reported symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux using the reflux symptom score in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with many chronic diseases among which is laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-related symptoms in patients with OSA using the Reflux Symptoms Score (RSS) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). METHODS: The medical records and video-recordings of patients with OSA who presented to a tertiary referral center were reviewed. The diagnosis of OSA was made using the STOP-BANG questionnaire and/or polysomnography. The prevalence of LPR-related symptoms was assessed using both the RSS and RSI questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients (69.2%) had a positive RSS in comparison to only 7 (17.9%) using the RSI (p = .052). Subgroup analysis of those who had polysomnography (n = 24) showed that 18 patients (75%) had a positive RSS in comparison to only 5 patients (20.8%) using the RSI. Patients in the high-risk category for OSA were also found to have a higher prevalence of LPR-related symptoms using both the RSS and RSI questionnaires in comparison to those in the lower risk categories. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation indicate that the prevalence of LPR-related symptoms is higher using the RSS in comparison to the RSI.

[Study on the time-point distribution characteristics of the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux].

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (24 h MII-pH) and to provide guidance for the development of individualized anti-reflux strategies for LPR patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24 h MII-pH data from 408 patients [339 males and 69 females, aged 23-84 (55.08±11.08) years] attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2013 to March 2020. The number of gas acid/weak-acid reflux, mixed gas-liquid acid/weak-acid reflux, liquid acid/weak-acid reflux and alkaline reflux events at different time points were recorded and statistically analyzed through SPSS 26.0 software. Results: A total of 408 patients were included. Based on the 24 h MII-pH, the total positive rate of LPR was 77.45% (316/408). The type of positive gaseous weak-acid reflux was significantly higher than the remaining types of LPR (χ2=297.12,P<0.001). Except the gaseous weak-acid reflux, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR showed a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Liquid acid reflux events occurred mainly between after dinner and the following morning, and 47.11% (57/121) of them occurred within 3 h after dinner. There was a significant positive association between Reflux Symptom Index scores and gaseous weak-acid reflux(r=0.127,P<0.01), liquid acid reflux(r=0.205,P<0.01) and liquid weak-acid reflux(r=0.103,P<0.05)events. Conclusions: With the exception of gaseous weak-acid reflux events, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR events has a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Gaseous weak-acid reflux events accounts for the largest proportion of all types of LPR events, but the pathogenic mechanisms of gaseous weak-acid reflux are needed to further investigate.

The key timing of pharyngeal reflux in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of pharyngeal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients over a 24-hour period and find out the key timing of pharyngeal reflux. METHODS: We reviewed 69 patients who visited our clinic with LPR-related symptoms and were proven to have pharyngeal reflux via 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24hr MII-pH) monitoring. Quantitative analysis was conducted for the LPR profiles, such as the acidity of reflux, nighttime reflux, and positional reflux. The time series of pharyngeal reflux episodes and mealtimes were analyzed over a 24-hour period. Also, we recruited 26 normal controls. We compared the timing of pharyngeal reflux between LPR patients and asymptomatic controls. RESULTS: The quantitative analysis revealed that pharyngeal reflux occurred 4.88 ± 4.59 times over 24 hours. Weakly acidic pharyngeal reflux was more abundant than acidic or weakly alkaline reflux. Pharyngeal reflux occurred mainly during daytime in the upright position. The most frequent timing of pharyngeal reflux episodes was within 2 hours after meals. Additionally, there was no significant difference of the timing of post-prandial reflux between LPR patients and asymptomatic controls. CONCLUSION: The key timing of pharyngeal reflux in patients with LPR was post-prandial 2 hours.

Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms, Dysphonia, and Vocal Tract Discomfort in Amateur Choir Singers.

INTRODUCTION: Vocal tract discomfort (VTD), dysphonia, and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are complaints frequently reported by amateur singers. There are two aims of this study. The first is to evaluate the prevalence of these symptoms using validated questionnaires. The second is to correlate singing-related variables with the questionnaire responses. METHODS: A total of 392 amateur choir singers (ACS) and 514 control subjects completed an online survey divided into four parts: (1) clinical and demographic characteristics, (2) training in singing and singing experience, (3) history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and LPR symptoms, (4) validated questionnaires. Specifically, the reflux symptom index (RSI), the vocal tract discomfort scale (VTDS), and the voice symptom scale (VoiSS) were included to analyze the actual burden related to LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia. RESULTS: ACS demonstrated a healthier lifestyle and a lower prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in comparison with control subjects. ACS scored significantly higher in VTDS and VoiSS than control subjects, while no differences in the RSI results were found. Significant correlations among the questionnaires' results were demonstrated. Occasional professional singing was the variable influencing VTDS and VoiSS results the most. CONCLUSION: ACS do not evidently manifest a higher impairment connected to LPR (RSI score), while they do report higher levels of voice (VoiSS score) and vocal tract (VTDS score) impairments, in comparison with control subjects. The relevant correlations among the PRO measures suggest that LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia are related to each other. Given the relevant repercussion on the severity of VTD and dysphonia, providers should specifically ask about occasional professional singing when treating amateur singers.

'Persistent throat symptoms' versus 'laryngopharyngeal reflux': a cross-sectional study refining the clinical condition.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients are assessed for chronic symptoms including: dysphonia, 'globus', throat clearing, postnasal secretions and cough; commonly grouped together and attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. This study aimed to explore a clinical trial's baseline dataset for patterns of presenting symptoms, which might provide a more rational basis for treatment. DESIGN: Baseline data were analysed for participants entering the Trial Of Proton-Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms: age, body mass index, Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux-Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire and Reflux Finding Score (RFS-endoscopic examination). The relationships between the questionnaires and demographic factors were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on individual symptom items in the combined questionnaires. The EFA factors were applied to a Cluster Analysis of participants, to explore the presence of identifiable patient. RESULTS: Throat clearing and globus were the highest ranked scores in the 344 participants. Increasing age was inversely associated with symptom severity (p<0.01). There was no relationship between the RFS and any of the three questionnaires. EFA resulted in a seven-factor model with clinically meaningful labels: voice, cough, gastrointestinal symptoms, airway symptoms and dysphagia, throat clearing, lump in throat, and life events. Cluster analysis failed to demonstrate any clinically meaningful clusters of patients. CONCLUSION: This study offers a framework for future research and demonstrates that individual symptoms cannot be used to group patients. The analysis supports the use of a broad 'umbrella' term such as persistent throat symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN38578686.

Assessment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the potential association between presence of LPR symptoms and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a representative sample from a population-based study. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Participants of the follow-up of the Epidemiological Sleep Study were evaluated. Sleep was assessed through questionnaires and polysomnography. The presence of LPR was based on the questionnaire Reflux Score Index (RSI), and scores higher than 13 were suggestive of LPR. A general linear model test was used for comparison of continuous data and Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Predictors of LPR were obtained by regression analysis. RESULTS: 701 were enrolled (54.8% female, 45.2% male; mean age, 50.2 ± 13.3 years). The mean apnea-hypopnea index score was 17 ± 18.3 events/hr, and the mean RSI score was 7.0 ± 8.1. LPR was found in 17% of the volunteers, whereas OSA was present in 38.5% of the sample. Specifically, in those patients with OSA, the prevalence of LPR was 45.4%; however, there was no statistically significant association between LPR and the presence of OSA. The severity of OSA was not associated with RSI score. The presence of LPR was associated with older age, smoking, excessive daytime sleepiness and worse quality of life and sleep scores questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Age, smoking, but not body mass index, were associated with LPR. There was not statistically significant association of LPR with OSA. Individuals with symptoms of LPR had greater drowsiness and worse quality of life and sleep. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1877-1882, 2022.

A Characterization Study of the Patients Visiting Hospital due to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Suspicion: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the characteristics of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, a total of 102 patients with suspected LPR who visited the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, between June 2019 and June 2021 were consecutively included. They were divided into the LPR-positive group and the LPR-negative group according to 24-h Dx-pH monitoring. The influencing factors of LPR, including the scores for AR (SFAR) and AR prevalence, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total SFAR and scores in items 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the LPR-positive group were significantly higher than those of the LPR-negative group (p < 0.05). The prevalence of AR in the LPR-positive group was 60%, which was significantly higher than that in the LPR-negative group (36.54%) (p < 0.05). After excluding confounding factors, AR was positively correlated with the incidence of LPR, and the incidence of LPR with AR was 2.372 times that of non-AR. Receiver operating characteristic curve results show that AR has the highest predictive value for LPR, and the area of AR under the curve is was 0.617. CONCLUSIONS: The SFAR and incidence of AR are high in patients with positive LPR, and AR may be a risk factor for LPR. The results of this study may deepen our understanding of the occurrence of LPR.

The association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and insomnia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of insomnia in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the relationship between the severity of insomnia and LPR-related symptoms. METHODS: We analyzed 69 patients with LPR and 61 healthy controls. The LPR was confirmed via the 24-h hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. Reflux symptoms and sleep disturbances were assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index and Insomnia Severity Index. We compared the prevalence of insomnia between the two groups. We analyzed the relationship between reflux symptoms and severity of insomnia. RESULTS: The prevalence of insomnia was significantly higher in patients with LPR than in healthy controls (46.3% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.049). The severity of reflux-related symptoms was correlated with insomnia severity (rho = 0.44; p < 0.001). Patients with LPR with nighttime reflux were more likely to have sleep disturbances than patients with LPR without nighttime reflux. CONCLUSION: Patients with LPR are more likely to experience insomnia than healthy controls, and the severity of reflux symptoms was related to the severity of insomnia.

The Prevalence of Esophageal Disorders Among Voice Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux-A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of esophageal disorders among voice patients with intractable laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) who have undergone 24 pH impedance and esophageal manometry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with LPR-associated dysphonia in the absence of subjective dysphagia who presented between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2019 and underwent 24 pH impedance and esophageal manometry studies after inadequate response to lifestyle modifications, high dose of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPIs), H2 blockers, alkaline water, and Gaviscon (GlaxoSmithKline, Warren, NJ, USA). The comorbidities, medications, Strobovideolaryngoscopy findings, 24 pH impedance, and esophageal manometry results were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 109 patients ages 19 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 51.5 (SD 16.8). About 24.8% of the 109 subjects were found to have peristaltic wave abnormalities indicating esophageal dysmotility (11% with esophageal stasis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were normotensive in 56.9% of patients, hypertensive in 24.8%, and hypotensive in 18.4% of patients. In addition, the upper esophageal sphincter pressures were normotensive in 57.8% of patients, hypertensive in 36.7%, and hypotensive in 2.8% of patients. About 12.6% had both lower esophageal sphincter and upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction (hypertensive or hypotensive). The average total reflux events in patients exhibiting dysmotility on manometry 101.81, which was significantly higher compared with the mean total of 61.28 in the group of patients without dysmotility (P= 0.0396). In addition, there was a significantly higher prevalence of total events that were weakly acidic in the group with dysmotility compared with the group without (all patients performed the study on reflux medications, mean of total weakly acidic events 70.2 in dysmotility group vs 44.2 in normal motility group, P= 0.0427).Finally, the average number of total supine reflux events and the total acidic supine events were both significantly higher in the dysmotility group compared with the group without motility problems (P = 0.0199 and P = 0.0213, respectively). CONCLUSION: Esophageal dysmotility may be a significant cofactor in voice patients with refractory LPR on appropriate reflux medications and lifestyle modifications. Further research is advised.

Association of Dry Eye with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common disorder, accounting for up to 35% of the general population. Therefore, we hypothesized that laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), inducing refluxate rising into airways, may involve the ocular surface and may either induce or worsen DED. AIM: To investigate the prevalence and relevance of suspected LPR in DED patients and subjects with refractive problems (RP) without DED, they were defined as non-dry eye group (NEG) in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients evaluated because of dry eye-like symptoms at eight tertiary ophthalmological clinics. Parameters included reflux symptom index (RSI), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE) for frequency and severity, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (BUT), and Oxford grading. RESULTS: The study included 245 subjects (72.5% females; mean age 56.3 years), 152 DED patients, and 93 sex- and age-matched NEG subjects. Pathological RSI (score>13) was detected in 80 subjects (32.6%); 68 (85%) with DED and 12 (15%) CG (OR = 8; p < .0001). In NEG, pathological RSI was associated with higher SANDE (Frequency and Severity), OSDI, and Schirmer scores (OR = 16.36; 14.51; 12.54; and 7.22, respectively. In DED patients, pathological RSI was associated with higher OSDI values (OR = 8.75). CONCLUSION: Patients with DED are at eight times higher risk for having pathological RSI than NEG patients. Moreover, pathological RSI was associated with more severe ocular symptoms both in DED and non-DED patients. The role of LPR in definite DED patients remains to be clarified, but this condition deserves to be investigated in managing patients with DED symptoms.

Anatomical and physiological characteristics in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A case-control study utilizing high-resolution impedance manometry.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms, such as hoarseness, throat clearing, throat pain, globus, and chronic cough, with the novel high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM). METHODS: Consecutive patients exhibited at least one LPR symptom for ≥4 weeks after 2-month proton-pump inhibitor treatment were enrolled during November 2014 and March 2018 from single tertiary medical center. All patients completed validated symptom questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and HRIM. Healthy volunteers were also recruited for comparison of esophageal parameters on HRIM. RESULTS: Eighty-nine LPR patients and 63 healthy volunteers were analyzed. Compared with healthy volunteers, LPR patients had significantly shorter upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES), a shorter intraabdominal esophagus (all P < 0.01), higher 4-s integrated relaxation pressures (IRP-4s) (P = 0.011) of the LES. After adjusted for age, sex, body weight, body height and alcohol consumption, multiple regression analysis showed that age, LES IRP-4s and the UES length were independent risk factors for LPR symptoms (OR 1.056, 95% CI 1.019-1.094; OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.004-1.222; OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.254-0.736, respectively). In subgroup analysis, patients with moderate LPR symptoms had lower IRP-4s (6.64 ± 4.55 vs. 8.69 ± 5.10, P = 0.049) and more failed peristalsis (27.33 ± 29.26 vs. 11.36 ± 21.20, P = 0.004) than those with mild LPR symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that esophageal structural factors and LES IRP-4s may contribute to the occurrence of LPR symptoms. Patients with moderate LPR symptoms were more likely to present with failed peristalsis.

How I Approach Laryngopharyngoesophageal Reflux (LPR).

The purpose of this article is to review the cornerstone and most recent literature regarding laryngopharynoesophageal reflux (LPR) including epidemiological characteristics, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and management. The role of pepsin in the pathophysiology of LPR is highlighted in addition to new diagnostic modalities and pharmacologic therapies that target pepsin.

The Association between Free Sugars Consumption and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese Adolescents.

There is a lack of evidence to show prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and dietary factors. Adolescents consume the most amount of free sugars among the Chinese population. We conducted this study to investigate the prevalence of LPR in Chinese adolescents and explore the association between free sugars consumption and LPR. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1517 middle school students in Hunan, China. An online questionnaire was applied to collect data on the condition of LPR, consumption of free sugars and other self-reported covariates. Height, weight and waist circumference were collected by anthropometric measurements. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association between LPR and free sugars consumption. The mean and standard deviation of free sugars consumption was 53.14 ± 44.75 (g/d). The prevalence of LPR was 8.11%. A positive association was observed between LPR and higher free sugars consumption after adjusted multiple covariates, with adjusted odds ratio (95% confident interval) of 1.656 (1.125-2.438). The prevalence of LPR among Chinese adolescents was high. Further analytic studies with strict design are required to test the association between LPR and free sugar consumption. Systematic strategies and policies should to be developed to reduce the intake of free sugars in order to prevent LPR.

Prevalence of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease in Suspected Laryngo- pharingeal Reflux Unresponsive to Proton-pump Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) may be part of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). However, sometimes suspected LPR seems refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI), questioning therefore the GERD diagnosis. Our aim was to evaluate the real-life prevalence of GERD in patients with a recent laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI. We also assessed whether other causes than GERD could explain the laryngoscopic findings in those patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with the diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI. Those patients must have been investigated by: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies; multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH); X-ray of the chest and/or of the paranasal sinuses; hormonal thyroid assessment; prick tests to assess food and/or inhalants and pollen allergy. RESULTS: We enrolled 28 patients (18, 64.3%, males and 10, 35.7%, females; median, IQR age 39.4, 21-75 yrs). Endoscopic hiatal hernia was found in 9/28 (32.1%) patients; the MII-pH analysis showed abnormality in 2/28 (7.14%) patients (both having also GERD symptoms); Chest X-ray found chest diseases in 2/28 (7.14%) patients and X-rays of the paranasal sinuses found sinusitis in 1/28 (3.6%); 2/28 (7.14%) patients had hyperthyroidism; food and/or inhalants and pollen allergy was found in 9 (32.1%) patients. In 12/28 (42.9%) patients, any of the investigated diseases was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the real prevalence of GERD in patients with a recent laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI, is low. Moreover, more than 40% of them did not show any of the investigated diseases in real life.

An epidemiological survey of gastroesophageal reflux disease at the digestive endoscopy center in Guangzhou.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the detection rates, common symptoms and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at the digestive endoscopy center. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional survey conducted at three hospitals and a total of 565 eligible participants were enrolled. All the patients completed routine ENT examination, gastroscopy, gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire (GerdQ), reflux symptom index (RSI) and a self-designed 25-item symptoms table survey. RESULTS: Among the 565 eligible participants, the detection rates of GERD and LPRD were 18.41% (104/565) and 9.91% (56/565), respectively. The detection rate of GERD combined with LPRD was 3.19% (18/565). Among GERD and LPRD patients, males (vs. females), middle-aged and elderly patients (vs. young people), BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m2 (vs. BMI < 24.0 kg/m2), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking), lying down immediately after meal (vs. no lying down immediately after meal) were significantly higher (all p < 0.05). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with GERD were dry mouth (66.35%), globus sensation (56.73%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (55.77%). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with LPRD were globus sensation (91.07%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (83.93%), and dry mouth (82.14%). CONCLUSION: GERD and LPRD had a high detection rate at the digestive endoscopy center in Guangzhou, China. Older age, BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m2, smoking and drinking history were risk factors for both GERD and LPRD. Neither GerdQ nor RSI scores included common extraesophageal symptoms.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease is More Severe in Obese Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate whether there is an impact of obesity and overweight on the clinical findings and therapeutic responses of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective uncontrolled. METHODS: Patients with LPR-related symptoms and positive LPR diagnosis at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH) were recruited from December 2017 to December 2020. Patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors, and alginate for 3 to 6 months. The following outcomes were studied according to the weight of patients: HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy features, symptoms, findings, and therapeutic response. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients completed the study, accounting for 134, 85, and 43 patients with normal weight (body mass index [BMI] <25), overweight (BMI = 25-29.99), and obesity (BMI >30). Obese patients reported significant higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), acid LPR, and a more severe LPR disease regarding the number of pharyngeal reflux events, reflux symptom score (RSS), and reflux sign assessment (RSA). RSS and RSA scores significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment irrespective of the patient weight group. Symptoms and signs continued to improve from 3 to 6-month posttreatment only in patients with a normal weight. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with a more severe LPR disease and a higher proportion of GERD and acid LPR. Obese LPR patients may require more frequently PPI-therapy regarding the higher prevalence of GERD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2742-E2748, 2021.

Prevalence and Features of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Primary Burning Mouth Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the prevalence and features of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective uncontrolled study. METHODS: Patients who visited our Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial surgery with BMS were prospectively recruited from September 2018 to September 2020. Patients benefited from dental, maxillofacial, otolaryngological examinations, and hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH). Oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal findings and symptoms were rated with Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12). Patients were treated with a combination of diet, pantoprazole, and alginate. RESULTS: From the 81 included patients, 76 reported >1 pharyngeal reflux events (93.8%), accounting for 35 (46.1%), 24 (31.6%), and 17 (22.3%) acid, mixed, and nonacid LPR, respectively. Thirty-two patients had both LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Thirty-eight patients benefited from pepsin saliva measurement, which was positive in 86.8% of cases. The mean scores of mouth/tongue burning, RSS-12, and RSA significantly improved from pre- to post-treatment (P < .004). At 3-month post-treatment, 62.5% of patients reported an improvement of mouth/tongue burning score. Patients with both GERD and LPR reported higher baseline RSS-12 and RSA scores. CONCLUSION: Acid, weakly acid, and nonacid LPR may be involved in the development of BMS. The use of an appropriate treatment considering the reflux features is associated with an improvement of symptoms and findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2627-E2633, 2021.