Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Care ; 42(6): 1042-1050, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30967437

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Young-onset diabetes is heterogeneous in etiology and disease progression. We compared the incidence of diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with young-onset type 2 diabetes with or without anti-GAD antibodies and patients with type 1 diabetes. We determined changes in glycemic control before and after commencement of insulin therapy stratified by antibody status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2012, 1,504 consecutively enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes who had received a diagnosis at <40 years of age and had available anti-GAD antibody status and 251 patients with type 1 diabetes from the Hong Kong Diabetes Register were followed for incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), severe hypoglycemia, and all-cause mortality until June 2015. Information on insulin use and HbA1c levels during follow-up was obtained. RESULTS: Anti-GAD antibodies were positive in 8.1% of patients with type 2 diabetes (GAD+). By multivariate Cox regression, patients with GAD+ had a lower hazard of CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43, P = 0.048), a higher hazard of severe hypoglycemia (HR 1.63, P = 0.032), and a similar hazard of ESRD and mortality compared with counterparts without anti-GAD antibodies (GAD-). Compared with patients with type 1 diabetes, ESRD was more likely to develop (HR 2.91, P = 0.043) in patients with GAD+, but no differences were detected in the hazards of severe hypoglycemia, CVD, and mortality. Among new insulin users (n = 304), patients with GAD+ had larger reductions in HbA1c than patients with GAD-after 12 months of insulin use (-2.30 ± 3.80% [25 ± 42 mmol/mol] vs -0.72 ± 1.86% [8 ± 20 mmol/mol], P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-GAD positivity identifies a group of patients with a different prognosis compared with patients without antibodies and those with type 1 diabetes. Patients with GAD+ responded differently to insulin compared with patients with GAD-.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/mortality , Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults/complications , Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults/mortality , Adult , Age of Onset , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Prospective Studies , Registries , Young Adult
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 139: 107-113, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29518492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) is the second most common form of diabetes, but data on its clinical course and prognosis are scarce. We compared long-term risk of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with LADA, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), and insulin deficient diabetes (IDD). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of 4368 adults with diabetes referred to the Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, between 1997 and 2012. Data on comorbidity, cardiovascular outcomes and death were obtained from prospective medical databases. We compared adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes for patients with LADA, T2D and IDD, respectively. RESULTS: We included 327 patients with LADA, 3539 with T2D and 502 with IDD. At diagnosis, patients with LADA were older (50 years (IQR 37-59)) than IDD patients (40 years (IQR 28-52)), but younger than patients with T2D (55 years (IQR 45-64)). During a median follow-up period of 6.6 years (IQR 3.4-9.4), patients with IDD had higher mortality than patients with LADA, age- and gender-adjusted HR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.2). T2D also conferred higher mortality than LADA, HR 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-1.9). Compared with LADA patients, cardiovascular outcome rates were increased both with IDD, HR 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7-2.0) and T2D, HR 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.8), with the strongest association observed for T2D vs. LADA and acute myocardial infarction HR 1.7 (95% CI, 0.8-3.5). CONCLUSION: LADA seems to be associated with lower mortality and lower risk of cardiovascular events, compared with both T2D and IDD.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults/complications , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Female , Humans , Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...