Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 51
Filter
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 25(10): 769-773, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Serum Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibody kits (LZ and LIA) using the latex agglutination immunoassay method are commercially available, but few studies have been performed to determine their diagnostic accuracy or to compare their results with those of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (EP and EIA). METHODS: Sera were obtained from 213 hospital outpatients with dyspeptic symptoms. The serological results were compared with the result of the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) which seems to be reliable. RESULTS: Of the 213 subjects, 154 were diagnosed as positive for H. pylori infection according to the UBT. The sensitivities and specificities of these tests were 97.4% and 76.3%, 98.1% and 78.0%, 99.4% and 74.6%, and 98.1% and 71.2% for the EP, LZ, EIA and LIA tests, respectively. When the 13 subjects whose seropositive results of the four kits were completely opposite to the negative results of the UBT were excluded, the specificities of evaluated kits were all higher than 90%. The concordance rate between the EP and EIA tests was 98.1% (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.83) and that between the LZ and LIA tests was 97.1% (correlation coefficient = 0.91). The LZ gave higher antibody titer value than EP (p < 0.0001, Z = 9.82; Wilcoxon signed-rank test), and EIA gave higher value than LIA (p < 0.0001, Z = 6.43; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The latex immunoassay method provided the same reliability to ELISA in terms of the diagnostic accuracy for current H. pylori infection, although we should take into account the titer value differences by each test method in practical use.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Latex Fixation Tests/instrumentation , Urea/analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breath Tests/instrumentation , Carbon Isotopes/analysis , Commerce , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/instrumentation , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/statistics & numerical data , Female , Helicobacter Infections/blood , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/immunology , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/economics , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urea/chemistry , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 32(5): 609-11, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23207649

ABSTRACT

Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis. In a prospective 3-year study, the reliability of two different RADT methods was compared, as performed by lab technicians versus physicians. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values, were calculated. When performed by physicians, the results (44.4 %, 8.3 %, 26.7 % and 16.7 %) of a latex agglutination test (LAT) were unacceptably low. However, after switching to a lateral-flow immunoassay (LFIT) and implementing additional hands-on training, the performance improved dramatically (100 %, 92.6 %, 84.6 % and 100 %). In conclusion, technical errors, along with a lack of experience and expertise, negatively impact RADT accuracy.


Subject(s)
Immunoassay/statistics & numerical data , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Medical Laboratory Personnel/education , Medical Laboratory Science/education , Pharyngitis/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Antigens, Bacterial , Humans , Medical Laboratory Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Tonsillitis/diagnosis , Tonsillitis/microbiology
3.
Indian J Med Res ; 127(5): 483-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18653913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Cryptococcosis is a chronic infective condition affecting the central nervous system. Unless diagnosed early and specific treatment instituted it can be fatal. There is an urgent need for a rapid and specific diagnostic tool for better management of the patients. Conventional methods such as culture and India ink are specific but cumbersome and time consuming. Serological methods of detection are rapid but have problems of false positivity and cross-reactivity with other micro-organisms. We carried out this study to compare and evaluate the conventional methods with serological methods of detection of cryptococcal meningitis. METHODS: A comparative evaluation of conventional methods (India ink and culture) with LAT (latex agglutination test) and EIA (enzyme immunoassay) was done in 127 CSF samples using culture and EIA as reference separately. RESULTS: India ink was positive for Cryptococcus in 72.4 per cent of the samples; 56 per cent were culture positive; LAT positive were 85 per cent and 79.5 per cent were positive by EIA. When culture was positive, all other tests were in agreement to it. However, when culture was negative there was significant difference between the pair of discordance of various diagnostic tests. Culture was 83.46 per cent in agreement to India ink, 76.3 per cent to EIA and 70.8 per cent to LAT. EIA was 92.9 per cent in agreement to India ink and LAT; 6.3 per cent showed false positive by LAT. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: EIA is valuable in establishing diagnosis when culture is negative for cryptococcosis. EIA is more specific and has potential advantages over LAT as it gives clear discrimination of positive from negative results. Thus, EIA may be used as a simple, rapid, and reliable serological test for early detection of cryptococcal antigen in clinical samples like CSF in routine laboratories.


Subject(s)
Cryptococcosis/diagnosis , Immunoenzyme Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carbon , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(5): 1853-5, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16672421

ABSTRACT

Leptospirosis is a febrile zoonosis of worldwide distribution. A latex agglutination assay was evaluated in two studies, the first using a panel of well-characterized sera from patients with leptospirosis and from patients with other disease states and the second, a prospective hospital-based study, evaluating sera from 186 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with acute febrile illness. The confirmed leptospirosis serum panel included paired acute- and convalescent-phase specimens from 40 cases, of which 34 gave positive latex tests (case sensitivity, 85%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 70 to 94%). The other diseases represented in the panel of 112 specimens from nonleptospirosis patients included autoimmune diseases, brucellosis, dengue, melioidosis, malaria, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, viral hepatitis, and a number of other viral infections. The specificity of latex agglutination using this panel was 81% (95% CI, 73 to 87%). Among the patients with acute febrile illness, there were 25 cases of leptospirosis and 161 patients with other diagnoses. The sensitivity and specificity of latex agglutination in this group were 88% (95% CI, 72 to 97%) and 98% (95% CI, 95 to 100%), respectively. In this evaluation, the two distinct groups of specimens gave similar results for sensitivity, but specificity was different in each study. The sensitivity and specificity observed for the hospital study were similar to those obtained in evaluations of other rapid tests in the same population. The results of this study suggest that multiple evaluations of new diagnostic assays should be performed, because performance characteristics may vary in different populations.


Subject(s)
Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Leptospirosis/diagnosis , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Barbados , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Leptospira/immunology , Leptospirosis/immunology , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(3): 934-7, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16517879

ABSTRACT

In this paper we report on an experimental evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods as means for the detection of oxacillin resistance in members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group. A total of 109 S. sciuri group member isolates (92 S. sciuri isolates, 9 S. lentus isolates, and 8 S. vitulinus isolates) were tested by the disk diffusion method, the agar dilution method, the oxacillin salt-agar screening method, slide latex agglutination for PBP 2a, and PCR assay for mecA as the reference method. The mecA gene was detected in 29 S. sciuri isolates, and the true-positive and true-negative results of the other tests were defined on the basis of the presence or the absence of the mecA gene. For the different methods evaluated, the sensitivities and specificities were as follows: for the disk diffusion test with a 1-microg oxacillin disk, 100% and 55.9%, respectively; for the disk diffusion test with a 30-mug cefoxitin disk, 93.5% and 100%, respectively; for the agar dilution method, 100% and 50%, respectively; for the oxacillin salt-agar screen test (with 6 microg of oxacillin per ml and 4% NaCl) 100% and 100%, respectively; and for the slide latex agglutination test for PBP 2a, 100% and 100%, respectively. The disk diffusion test with various beta-lactam antibiotics was performed to evaluate their use for the prediction of oxacillin resistance. The results indicate that meropenem, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefuroxime, cefotetan, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, moxalactam, cefaclor, and cefprozil may be used as surrogate markers of oxacillin resistance, although further studies of their use for the detection of oxacillin resistance are required.


Subject(s)
Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Oxacillin/pharmacology , Penicillin Resistance/genetics , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/genetics , Animals , Genes, Bacterial , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Phenotype , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcus/classification , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(5): 1962-4, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15131155

ABSTRACT

We compared the performance of Staphychrom II (International Microbio, Signes, France), a rapid (2-h) chromogenic staphylocoagulase test that uses human prothrombin and protease inhibitors, with those of the reference tube coagulase test (TCT) and the latex agglutination test (LAT) Slidex Staph Plus for the rapid identification of S. aureus. Prospective evaluation with 293 fresh clinical isolates yielded sensitivities, specificities, and predictive and negative predictive values of 98.1, 100, 100, and 95.1%, respectively, for the Staphychrom II test; 98.6, 98.7, 99.6, and 96.3%, respectively, for LAT; and 97.6, 98.7, 99.5, and 93.9%, respectively, for TCT. The perfect specificity of the Staphychrom II test was confirmed by testing 193 collection strains selected because of their potential testing pitfalls. The Staphychrom II test was positive for 90% of the 215 S. aureus strains tested after only 1 h of incubation. The Staphychrom II test was as sensitive as the reference TCT and was 100% specific.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques , Coagulase/analysis , Staphylococcus aureus/enzymology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Bacteriological Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Chromogenic Compounds , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification
7.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 19(4): 290-2, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10783016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The bacterial latex agglutination assay is ordered predominantly on the pediatric population, for rapid screening for bacterial surface antigens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or urine specimens. The high cost of this assay and questions raised in the literature regarding its accuracy led to a retrospective review of the use of this assay at a medium-sized midwest teaching hospital. The results of 6,370 bacterial latex agglutination tests performed between May, 1995, and November, 1996, and charts of patients being tested were reviewed. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 28.6% and 86.7% for urine specimens and 70.0% and 99.4% for CSF specimens. A total of 11 pathogens were accurately detected (7 CSF and 4 urine). There were 13 false negatives and 59 false positives. None of the true positives had a discernible effect on either treatment or hospital course; however, several of the erroneous tests resulted in delayed or unnecessary treatment and workup of the involved patients. The annual billed cost of this test at this institution (fiscal years 1995 to 1997) averaged $167,000 per annum. This does not include indirect costs associated with increased length of hospital stay, overutilization of antibiotics and excess laboratory tests ordered as a result of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial antigen latex agglutination testing is neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific to be used as a screening test. Accurate results have no demonstrable clinical impact, whereas numerous inaccurate results are often generated at great cost. The continued use of the latex agglutination assay should be seriously questioned in an era when cost containment and clinical efficiency are becoming increasingly important.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/analysis , Gram-Negative Bacteria/immunology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/immunology , Health Care Costs , Latex Fixation Tests/economics , Unnecessary Procedures/economics , Antigens, Surface/cerebrospinal fluid , Antigens, Surface/urine , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Illinois , Infant , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 37(11): 3662-7, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10523570

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia pseudomallei is the causative agent of melioidosis. In northeast Thailand, this gram-negative bacterium is a major cause of mortality from septicemia. The definitive diagnosis of this disease is made by bacterial culture. In this study, we produced a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific to the 30-kDa protein of B. pseudomallei by in vivo and in vitro immunization of BALB/c mice with a crude culture filtrate antigen. The MAb could directly agglutinate with all 243 clinical isolates of B. pseudomallei but not with other gram-negative bacteria, except for one strain of Burkholderia mallei. However, the MAb cross-reacted with the gram-positive Bacillus sp. and Streptococcus pyogenes. B. pseudomallei in brain heart infusion broth (BHIB) subcultured from a BacT/Alert automated blood culture system could be identified by simple agglutination with this MAb assay. The sensitivity and specificity of direct agglutination compared to the "gold standard," the culture method, were 94.12 and 98.25%, respectively. However, the MAb adsorbed to polystyrene beads or latex particles directly identified the bacterium in blood culture specimens and in BHIB subcultured from a BacT/Alert automated blood culture system. The sensitivity of the latex agglutination test was 100% for both blood culture and BHIB specimens. The specificity was 85.96 and 96.49% for the blood culture and BHIB specimens, respectively. The specificity could be increased if the nonspecific materials in the blood culture broths were eradicated by centrifugation at low speeds. Thus, a combination of blood culture and the agglutination method could be used for the rapid diagnosis of melioidosis in the routine bacteriological laboratory. This method could speed up detection of the bacterium in blood culture by at least 2 days, compared to the conventional bacterial culture method. In addition, the MAb is stable at room temperature for 2 weeks and at 4, -20, and -70 degrees C for at least 1 year. The latex reagent was stable for at least 6 months at 4 degrees C.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Bacteriological Techniques , Burkholderia pseudomallei/immunology , Burkholderia pseudomallei/isolation & purification , Melioidosis/diagnosis , Agglutination Tests/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Bacteriological Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Blood/microbiology , Cross Reactions , Drug Stability , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Melioidosis/immunology , Mice , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Klin Lab Diagn ; (5): 54-6, 1999 May.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10399440

ABSTRACT

Results of measuring the concentrations of IgM in human serum using a specific latex diagnostic agent in the latex agglutination test (LAT) are presented. The authors demonstrate a higher efficacy of LAT in comparison with Mancini's method.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin M/blood , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Adult , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Clin Lab Sci ; 11(5): 266-8, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10186949

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare four Escherichia coli O157 test kits for detection of E. coli O157:H7 isolated from clinical specimens. DESIGN: One hundred two Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates obtained from stored specimens and 99 non-sorbitol fermenting enterobacteriaceae isolates from current clinical specimens were tested against four latex kits: Wellcolex, RIM, Prolex, and Oxoid. Each isolate was tested against all four kits on the same day. SETTING: Provincial Laboratory of Saskatchewan, Canada. PATIENTS: Patients from Saskatchewan with diarrhea submitted stool specimens through their family physicians to the Provincial Laboratory for detection of enteric pathogens including E. coli O157:H7. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of each test kit were: Wellcolex 100%, 99%; RIM 100%, 99%; Prolex 99%, 100%; Oxoid 100%, 100%. The Prolex kit failed to detect one E. coli O157:H7 isolate. CONCLUSION: All kits tested were able to identify E. coli O157 isolated from stool specimens. Further study with Prolex is needed to assess the significance of the one missed E. coli O157 isolate.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Bacteriological Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Diarrhea/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 21(9): 917-21, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9613784

ABSTRACT

The performance of two Aspergillus antigenemia systems, the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Platelia Aspergillus test, and the latex agglutination (LA), Pastorex Aspergillus test, in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis were compared by testing 364 serum samples from 22 bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. Sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA test were 60% and 82% respectively, vs 40% and 94% for the LA test. In the two patients found positive with both methods, the ELISA test became positive earlier than the LA test or remained positive after the LA test had become negative. These results encourage further evaluation of the Platelia Aspergillus test, to assess its role in the management of invasive aspergillosis in BMT patients.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Aspergillosis/etiology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Lung Diseases, Fungal/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Fungal/etiology , Antigens, Fungal/blood , Aspergillosis/microbiology , Aspergillus/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/statistics & numerical data , Galactose/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Lung Diseases, Fungal/microbiology , Male , Mannans/blood , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
J Immunol Methods ; 205(2): 151-6, 1997 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9294596

ABSTRACT

This work is based on the well-established immunoassay principle of agglutination of latex particles covered by immunoproteins. In our experiments, positively charged particles act as carriers for the F(ab')2 fragment, obtained from rabbit polyclonal IgG, active against C-reactive protein (CRP). The presence of the antigen CRP in the immunolatex system causes agglutination and the aim of the present study was to compare different optical techniques (turbidimetry, nephelometry, angular anisotropy and photon correlation spectroscopy) capable of detecting the agglutination. The sensitivity and detection limit largely depend on the optical method. We have analyzed for each optical technique the following aspects: sensitivity, reproducibility, detection limit, reaction time, amount of sample wasted and availability of the required detection device. The results presented in this paper show that both angular anisotropy and photon correlation spectroscopy offer lower detection limits, and use little reagent, but have longer assay times than the classical optical techniques of turbidimetry and nephelometry.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Optics and Photonics , Animals , Anisotropy , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Light , Nephelometry and Turbidimetry , Rabbits , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrophotometry
14.
Urology ; 50(6): 882-7, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9426718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical performance of the BTA TRAK assay and to compare it with that of voided urine cytology (VUC) and the Bard BTA test (BTA) in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer (BC). METHODS: The study was performed on randomly selected archival voided urine samples for many of which VUC and/or BTA information was available. Sensitivity was determined in samples from patients with histologically confirmed recurrent BC. Specificity was determined in samples from healthy volunteers, patients with three categories of current medical conditions, and patients with a history of BC but no current evidence of disease. RESULTS: The TRAK assay was positive in 156 of 216 samples for patients diagnosed with BC, for an overall sensitivity of 72%. Mean values increased with progressing grade and stage of disease. In the comparison between TRAK and VUC, the overall sensitivities were 68% and 25%, respectively (P < 0.001). For Stages Ta and T1 and for all tumor grades, the sensitivity of the TRAK assay was significantly greater than that of VUC (P < 0.001). TRAK sensitivity was also significantly better than that of BTA (73% versus 58%, P = 0.005). The specificity of the TRAK assay ranged from 75% in samples from patients with genitourinary disease to 97% in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The TRAK assay is superior to VUC and the original BTA test in the detection of BC. The results of the study indicate that the TRAK assay may be a useful adjunct to cystoscopy in the management of patients with recurrent BC.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/analysis , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Latex Fixation Tests , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/immunology , Urine/cytology , Adult , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/urine , ROC Curve , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Washington
15.
J Clin Microbiol ; 34(11): 2718-21, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8897171

ABSTRACT

A three-center study was undertaken to compare several test methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile, associated toxin, or related markers by using 927 stool specimens. Methods included direct assay of cytotoxin in stool by tissue culture, C. difficile bacterial culture followed by cytotoxin assay, bacterial culture alone, latex agglutination assay, and the ImmunoCard C. difficile test (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.). The sensitivities, as determined against direct cytotoxin assay results, of the ImmunoCard C. difficile and latex agglutination assays were 84 and 67%, respectively (92 and 77%, respectively, when adjusted for bacterial culture outcomes). Evaluation for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) among 864 patients was based on clinical criteria for antibiotic-associated diarrhea combined with laboratory evidence of toxin or toxin-producing C. difficile in stool specimens. The sensitivity of each test method for screening of CDAD was as follows: bacterial culture, 95%; culture with cytotoxin assay of isolates, 90%; ImmunoCard C. difficile test, 83%; cytotoxin assay 82%; and latex agglutination assay, 67% (P < or = 0.05 versus all other methods). The standard deviations of the test sensitivity statistics between study sites were ranked as follows: cytotoxin assay (+/- 3.1%) < ImmunoCard C. difficile test (+/- 5.7%) < latex agglutination assay (+/- 12.3%) < culture (+/- 24.7%) < culture with cytotoxin assay (+/- 28.0%). The data support the use of the ImmunoCard C. difficile test as an adjunct for the diagnosis of CDAD.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Bacteriological Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Clostridioides difficile/immunology , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Cytotoxins/analysis , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoassay/statistics & numerical data , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 34(7): 1773-5, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8784587

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the performance of a new latex agglutination test, Pyloriset Dry (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland), in the simultaneous detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM antibodies to Helicobacter pylori and compared it with that of the Pyloristat test (BioWhittaker, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detecting IgG to H. pylori, for 96 untreated dyspeptic patients who had undergone gastroduodenal endoscopy. Infection was diagnosed in 56 cases by positive culture and/or positive Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (antral biopsies) and was associated with chronic gastritis in 52 patients. Forty noninfected patients did not have chronic gastritis. The sensitivity of Pyloriset Dry was 91.1%. The sensitivity of Pyloristat was 91.1 or 82.1%, depending on whether equivocal results were considered positive or negative, respectively. Both tests had a specificity of 87.5%. Their performances were not statistically different. Thus, Pyloriset Dry is an alternative to serological tests for adults, particularly when a small number of serum samples has to be tested.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/immunology , Helicobacter pylori/immunology , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Adult , Diagnostic Errors , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/statistics & numerical data , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/immunology , Gastritis/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Z Rheumatol ; 55(3): 158-67, 1996.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8768145

ABSTRACT

In this prospective study, sera of 440 patients with rheumatic and degenerative joint diseases were tested for the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF). The Latex agglutination test (LFT), Waaler-Rose hemagglutination, laser nephelometry and IgM-Enzyme immunoassay (IgM-EIA) were used for detecting IgM-rheumatoid factors. In addition, rheumatoid factor of IgA isotype was measured by an IgA-Enzyme immunoassay. Sensitivity, specificity, pre-test- and post-test-probability were evaluated based on the data obtained to compare the test systems used. Under prospective patient selection, none of the test systems used reached a sensitivity of 100% concerning its cut off level. Despite this limitation, latex agglutination and IgM-EIA reached the highest sensitivity. Waaler-Rose test (90,8%) showed the best result for specificity. The IgA-EIA held the third position in sensitivity, specificity and efficiency. By comparing sensitivity with specificity, no test system can be recognized as the absolutely best one, since the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) overlapped. Practically rheumatoid factor measurement should initially use a highly sensitive assay, such as LFT and IgM-EIA to screen for RF. In the case of a positive result a more specific assay should be used, for example laser nephelometry, to confirm the result.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Rheumatoid Factor/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis/diagnosis , Arthritis/immunology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Hemagglutination Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Nephelometry and Turbidimetry/statistics & numerical data , Predictive Value of Tests , Probability , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 34(5): 1161-5, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8727895

ABSTRACT

The Leuko-Test yielded a negative predictive value of 98.4% when it was used to screen 325 patients for inflammatory bacterial enteritis and a negative predictive value of 99.4% when it was used to screen 416 stool specimens for those from which enteric pathogens would likely be recovered when cultured. Neither microscopy for fecal leukocytes nor an assay for fecal occult blood, alone or in combination, allowed for the reliable detection of invasive bacterial enteritis or the reliable selection of specimens for culture. When positive in the Leuko-Test, specimens collected from patients after the third day of hospitalization did not yield enteric pathogens when the specimens were cultured, and specimens collected from inpatients within the first 3 days of hospitalization or from outpatients did not contain Clostridium difficile toxin A. As a screening test, the Leuko-Test has the ability to generate rapidly a result which can support the presumptive diagnosis of inflammatory bacterial enteritis or which can be used to determine the suitability of stool specimens for bacteriologic culture.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacteriological Techniques , Enteritis/diagnosis , Feces/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacteriological Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Errors , Enteritis/microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Feces/chemistry , Feces/cytology , Humans , Lactoferrin/analysis , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Leukocytes/pathology , Occult Blood , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
J Clin Microbiol ; 34(2): 445-6, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8789035

ABSTRACT

We evaluated an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA; BioWhittaker) and a latex agglutination (LA; Becton Dickinson) for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody determination, using cell-mediated immunity (CMI) as a "gold standard." VZV EIA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87, 91, 87, and 91%, respectively, compared with CMI. Correlation was excellent except when the varicella index was 0.9 to 1.2. We defined sera with varicella indices of 0.9 to 1.2 as indeterminate. LA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96, 91, 97, and 90%, respectively, compared with EIA. LA reactivity only at a 1:2 dilution did not correlate with CMI, but sera reactive at dilutions of > or = 1:8 indirectly did. We defined indeterminate sera as those reactive at 1:2 and nonreactive at 1:8. EIA and LA were equivalent for determining VZV immune status, and both methods required modified criteria of interpretation to increase their specificity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology , Immunity, Cellular , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/statistics & numerical data , Evaluation Studies as Topic , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...