Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
3.
s.l; s.n; 2002. 6 p.
Non-conventional in English | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, HANSEN, Hanseníase Leprosy, SESSP-ILSLACERVO, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1242564

ABSTRACT

A retrospective study was done at the Leprosy Control Unit (LCU) in Durgapur of Burdwan district, West Bengal, to determine the relapse rate following multidrug therapy (MDT). A total of 1581 patients (1276 PB and 305 MB) completed MDT regimens during a period of 5 years as per WHO recommendations and National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) guidelines. The treated patients were kept under surveillance as per NLEP guidelines and searched for relapses. The results of MDT were compared with those of pre-MDT (monotherapy) era at the same centre (total: 405 patients; PB-373, MB-32) andalso with those of the Leprosy Clinic in Gopalpur (only dapsone was given to a total of 189 patients, PB-167, MB-22) Following monotherapy, the relapse rate was 10.06% at the Gopalpur Leprosy Clinic and 12.4% at the Dargapur LCU during the 2 years (PB) and 5 years (MB) of surveillance, whereas following MDT no relapse case was encountered both in PB and MB cases during the surveillance periods recommended by WHO. The results of this study are comparable with those of ohter studies. Though a few studies showed relapses during long-term surveillance beyond the periods recommended by WHO, it is once again established that MDT can prevent relapse in leprosy


Subject(s)
Humans , Leprosy/epidemiology , Leprosy/prevention & control , Leprosy/drug therapy , Recurrence/prevention & control , Clofazimine/therapeutic use , Dapsone/therapeutic use , Leprostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Leprostatic Agents/history , Leprostatic Agents/standards , Leprostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Rifampin/therapeutic use
4.
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis ; 68(3): 283-90, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11221091

ABSTRACT

The recent World Health Organization multicentric field study on the treatment of paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients with single skin lesion (SSL) and a single dose of rifampin-ofloxacin-minocycline (ROM) brought new hope to those who are engaged in the eradication of leprosy from India. Being encouraged by the WHO report, we undertook the present hospital-based study and found that PB leprosy patients with SSL were morphologically and histopathologically heterogeneous. The histological spectrum of SSL ranged from indeterminate through tuberculoid (TT) to borderline tuberculoid (BT) leprosy, and most patients had active BT leprosy. Ninety new, untreated PB leprosy patients with SSL were included in the present study for comparative assessment of the efficacies of ROM and ROM plus Convit vaccine therapies. Children, pregnant women, lactating mothers and patients with any thickening of nerves were excluded. All patients were bacteriologically negative (skin-smear test) but lepromin reactive. The patients were divided into two groups after proper matching for morphological and histological status of SSL: a) The test group included 60 patients and the control group included 30 patients. The test group was given a single dose of ROM initially and two injections of low-dose Convit vaccine, one initially and the other at the end of 3 months. b) The control group was given only a single dose of ROM initially. Both groups were followed clinically every 2 weeks for 6 months and retested for histological, bacteriological and lepromin status at the end of 6 months. Thereafter, they were followed clinically every month for another 6 months. In the test group, the SSL resolved in 33.3%, regressed in 48.3%, and remained active in 18.3% of the patients, while the granuloma disappeared in 70% of the cases. Only one patient developed neuritis, and in another patient the disease relapsed on the eighth month. On the other hand, the SSL in the control patients resolved, regressed and remained active in 13.3%, 63.3% and 23.3% of the cases, respectively, while the granuloma disappeared in 53.3% of the cases. In the seven patients who remained active, the disease course was progressive, and two of them developed neuritis. The clinical outcome of the patients treated with ROM plus low-dose Convit vaccine was statistically superior to those treated with single-dose ROM therapy alone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Vaccines/therapeutic use , Leprostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Leprosy, Lepromatous/drug therapy , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Rifampin/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic/standards , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/standards , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/standards , Bacterial Vaccines/standards , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , India , Leprostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Leprostatic Agents/standards , Leprosy, Lepromatous/immunology , Leprosy, Lepromatous/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Minocycline/administration & dosage , Minocycline/standards , Mycobacterium leprae/drug effects , Mycobacterium leprae/immunology , Ofloxacin/administration & dosage , Ofloxacin/standards , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Rifampin/standards
5.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract ; 25(4): 981-1005, 1995 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8525577

ABSTRACT

This article compiles information on various therapies used in feline dermatology. Information on the following therapeutic agents and devices is discussed: antibiotics, antifungals, antileprosy drugs, antiparasiticides, antivirals, antihistamines, behavior modification drugs, fatty acids, progestogens, steroids, immunomodulating drugs, chemotherapeutic/immunosuppressive agents, retinoids, mechanical devices, hyposensitization, immunotherapy, food elimination trials, hypoallergenic diets, and miscellaneous topical agents such as polyhydroxydine solution, tar, and benzocaine-containing creams.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases/drug therapy , Dermatitis/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Antifungal Agents/standards , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antiprotozoal Agents/adverse effects , Antiprotozoal Agents/standards , Antiprotozoal Agents/therapeutic use , Cats , Dermatitis/drug therapy , Drug Interactions , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/standards , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/standards , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Leprostatic Agents/adverse effects , Leprostatic Agents/standards , Leprostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Steroids/adverse effects , Steroids/standards , Steroids/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...