Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hematother Stem Cell Res ; 9(2): 269-74, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10813541

ABSTRACT

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) has become an accepted form of therapy for a number of malignant hematologic diseases. The optimal method for the collection of PBSC is yet to be defined. Large-volume leukapheresis may be able to collect adequate numbers of PBSC with the patient undergoing fewer procedures. We routinely process 7 L of blood per leukapheresis. Hence, we elected to assess whether a modest increase in the blood volume processed would, on average, decrease the number of leukaphereses each patient needed to undergo to collect > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight. Sixty patients were randomized to undergo 7 L leukaphereses (n = 31 patients; 87 leukaphereses) or 10 L leukaphereses (n = 29 patients; 81 leukaphereses). The median number of leukaphereses required per patient to collect the target number of CD34+ cells was two (range one to five) for both groups (p = 0.83). The median number of nucleated cells collected per patient was greater for the 10 L group (8.2 x 10(8)/kg versus 5.3 x 10(8)/kg, p = 0.005), as was the median number of mononuclear cells (MNC) (4.7 x 10(8)/kg versus 3.6 x 10(8)/kg, p = 0.0001), whereas there was no statistical difference between the groups for the median number of CD34+ cells collected per patient (3.2 x 10(6)/kg versus 3.7 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.98). Therefore, over the 18-month period of this trial, the use of a 10 L leukapheresis volume did not decrease the number of leukaphereses performed compared with a 7 L leukapheresis volume.


Subject(s)
Leukapheresis/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Antigens, CD34/blood , Blood Cell Count , Blood Volume , Drug Tolerance , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Leukapheresis/psychology , Leukapheresis/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Quality Control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
2.
Med Pediatr Oncol ; 32(1): 7-10, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9917746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We update our experience on large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) in very small patients with malignancies. LVLs were performed with the aim of reducing the psychological impact of leukaphereses by reducing the number of procedures while collecting large numbers of cells. PROCEDURE: Seventeen LVLs were performed using a Cobe Spectra separator in 14 patients weighing < or = 15 kg. A median of 3.8 patient's blood volumes corresponding to 296 mL/kg (range, 202-565) of blood was processed per session of 190 minutes (120-279) duration. A femoral catheter was installed specially for collection for 88% LVL (vs. 35% for standard leukaphereses). A median volume of 16.9 mL/kg was collected with 5.4 x 10(8) MNC/kg (range, 0.6-16.3) and 8.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 1.3-31.7). RESULTS: No signs of complications due to citrate toxicity were encountered. No hypotensive or hypothermic episodes were observed. Platelet counts were significantly diminished after each procedure (median: -59%). When the extracorporal line was not primed with red blood cells (RBC), the difference between pre-LVL and post-LVL hemoglobin levels was significant with a median 32 g/L decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The LVL approach for peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collection in very small children may expose them to the risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia and an excess of special central line installation. The application of this technique in these patients should be reserved for special cases when a very large number of cells must be collected and should be performed by an experienced team.


Subject(s)
Body Weight , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukapheresis/methods , Anemia/etiology , Antigens, CD34/analysis , Blood Volume , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Child , Child, Preschool , Citrates/adverse effects , Citrates/therapeutic use , Clone Cells/cytology , Erythrocytes , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Hypotension/prevention & control , Hypothermia/prevention & control , Infant , Leukapheresis/psychology , Platelet Count , Risk Factors , Safety , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Time Factors
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 16(4): 541-7, 1995 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8528170

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare anxiety, pain and discomfort of cancer patients submitted to either peripheral blood progenitor cell collection (PBPCC) or bone marrow harvest (BMH). Patients, randomized (7/1993-2/1994), in view of autograft, to receive the first procedure or the second one, completed self-administered questionnaires. Anxiety was assessed by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory and pain using visual analogical scale (VAS) and McGill Pain questionnaire. Before the procedure, BMH patients (n = 25) experienced more anxiety (P < 0.01) and more trouble or inconvenience for having to come and stay at the hospital (P < 0.0001) than PBPCC patients (n = 40). Pain due to BMH is significantly higher than pain induced by PBPCC (P < 0.001 for VAS and total McGill score). However, patients submitted to PBPCC with a femoral catheter (n = 19) had significantly higher total McGill scores and sensory sub-scores than patients without it (n = 21). At discharge from the hospital, PBPCC patients expressed more positive judgements towards the collection procedure than BMH patients. These results suggest that a better patient acceptability of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autograft may be obtained by substituting PBPCC for BMH for stem cell collection.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Bone Marrow Cells , Cell Separation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Leukapheresis , Pain/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Leukapheresis/adverse effects , Leukapheresis/psychology , Male , Middle Aged
4.
J Clin Apher ; 2(1): 32-40, 1984.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6536657

ABSTRACT

During the last 15 months, 609 mononuclear cell collections were performed. Lymphocytapheresis and monocytapheresis provides cells for in vitro research studies, investigational transfusion studies and as therapeutic procedures. Automated leukapheresis procedures yields from 1.0-1.5 X 10(9) lymphocytes per liter blood processed. Monocyte yields generally 1/10 of the lymphocyte yields in both lymphocytapheresis and monocytapheresis procedures. Donors had very few reactions, and post collection CBC's showed no significant abnormalities. Mononuclear cell donation appears to have no risk to the normal donor.


Subject(s)
Leukapheresis/methods , Blood Donors , Centrifugation , Fear , Humans , Leukapheresis/instrumentation , Leukapheresis/psychology , Lymphocytes , Monocytes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...