Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Different Trimesters of Pregnant Women with Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug in pregnant women due to its low teratogenic risk profile, favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, and safety profile. Serum levels of levetiracetam vary in epilepsy during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the serum levels of levetiracetam during different trimesters of pregnancy by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective study. Pregnant women with epilepsy on levetiracetam were enrolled after getting written informed consent from them. Serum trough levels of levetiracetam were estimated at all trimesters by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: The study included 16 participants with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 27.75 ± 4 years. There were nine (56.2%) participants with generalized seizure disorder and seven (43.8%) participants of focal seizure disorder. Among 16 patients, 10 (62.5%) participants were on levetiracetam alone and six (37.5%) participants were on levetiracetam combined with other antiepileptic drugs. In a total of 48 trough samples, 45 sample concentrations were below the therapeutic range of 12-46 mg/l and three sample concentrations were within the therapeutic range. There was a statistically significant difference in the concentration-dose ratio (CDR) of levetiracetam between the third and first trimesters (P-value 0.018). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in serum levetiracetam concentration between the third and first trimesters. A well-conducted, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling study in PWWE with a control group is needed in future to evaluate the whole pharmacokinetic profile of levetiracetam and to correlate the clinical outcome.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy: Levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication that is mainly excreted by the kidneys. Due to its low teratogenic risk, LEV is frequently prescribed for women with epilepsy (WWE). Physiological changes during gestation affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of LEV. The goal of our study was to characterize the changes in LEV clearance during pregnancy and the postpartum period, to better plan an LEV dosing paradigm for pregnant women. METHODS: This retrospective observational study incorporated a cohort of women who were followed up at the epilepsy in pregnancy clinic at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center during the years 2020-2023. Individualized target concentrations of LEV and an empirical postpartum taper were used for seizure control and to reduce toxicity likelihood. Patient visits took place every 1-2 months and included a review of medication dosage, trough LEV blood levels, week of gestation and LEV dose at the time of level measurement, and seizure diaries. Total LEV concentration/dose was calculated based on LEV levels and dose as an estimation of LEV clearance. RESULTS: A total of 263 samples were collected from 38 pregnant patients. We observed a decrease in LEV concentration/dose (C/D) as the pregnancy progressed, followed by an abrupt postpartum increase. Compared to the 3rd trimester, the most significant C/D decrease was observed at the 1st trimester (slope = .85), with no significant change in the 2nd trimester (slope = .11). A significant increase in C/D occurred postpartum (slope = 5.23). LEV dose was gradually increased by 75% during pregnancy compared to preconception. Average serum levels (µg/mL) decreased during pregnancy. During the postpartum period, serum levels increased, whereas the LEV dose was decreased by 24%, compared to the 3rd trimester. SIGNIFICANCE: LEV serum level monitoring is essential for WWE prior to and during pregnancy as well as postpartum. Our data contribute to determining a rational treatment and dosing paradigm for LEV use during both pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Effects of concurrent and staggered dosing of semi-solid enteral nutrients on pharmacokinetic behavior of antiepileptic drugs after oral administration in rats.

BACKGROUND: The use of enteral nutrients plays a highly important role in accurate nutrition management, but limited information is currently available on the cautionary points of semi-solid enteral nutrients. AIM: In this study, we examined whether the pharmacokinetic profiles of sodium valproate (SVA), levetiracetam (LEV), and carbamazepine (CBZ) are affected by altering the dosing time of RACOL®-NF Semi Solid for Enteral Use (RASS), a prescribed semi-solid formula. We also investigated whether the pharmacokinetic interaction observed in this study can be avoided by staggered dosing of the chemical drug and semi-solid enteral nutrient. METHODS: The plasma concentration of SVA, LEV and CBZ after oral administration was measured by LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: There was no difference in pharmacokinetic characteristics of SVA and LEV when the dosing time of RASS was altered. On the other hand, the plasma concentration of CBZ after oral administration at all sampling points decreased with the extension of the dosing time of RASS, which was consistent with the Cmax and AUC. However, no significant difference was observed in the pharmacokinetic profiles or parameters of CBZ between the short-term and long-term RASS dosing groups by prolonging the administered interval of CBZ and RASS for 2 hr. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the pharmacokinetic profiles of CBZ, but not SVA and LEV, after its oral administration are affected by the dosing time of RASS, but staggered administration of CBZ and RASS prevented their interaction.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method with triple-stage fragmentation to determine levetiracetam in epileptic patient serum and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug that is primarily approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of focal and generalized seizures. This study describes the development and validation of a highly selective and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method with triple-stage fragmentation to determine levetiracetam in epileptic patient serum. After simple protein precipitation, the analytes were separated on a short reversed-phase column (Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column, 4.6 × 50 mm, 2.7 µm) using isocratic elution with 25% 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 75% methanol (solvent B) at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. The linear range is 0.5-50 µg/mL (R2  > 0.99). All the validation data, such as lower limit of quantification, linearity, specificity, recoveries, matrix effects, and other parameters, fit the request of biological method validation guidance. Passing-Bablok regression coefficients demonstrated that there is no constant bias and no proportional bias between the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods with triple-stage fragmentation and liquid multiple reaction monitoring. Bland-Altman plot showed that the developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method with triple-stage fragmentation method is reliable and accurate to determine levetiracetam in human serum.

Utility of monitoring the serum levetiracetam concentration for intraoperative seizure control during awake craniotomy.

Awake craniotomy is an established procedure for resecting brain tumors in eloquent lesions, and intraoperative seizure is one of the most important complications. Phenytoin is normally used to control intraoperative seizures. Recently, phenytoin was replaced with levetiracetam at our institution because the latter has fewer side effects. While the phenytoin dose is calibrated in accordance with the serum concentration, there is currently no consensus on a method of monitoring the serum concentration of levetiracetam or the effective concentration range needed to control intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy. The present study therefore aimed to determine whether monitoring the serum levetiracetam concentration is useful for controlling intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy. The intraoperative serum concentration of levetiracetam during awake craniotomy was measured in 34 patients and compared with that of phenytoin in 33 patients undergoing the same procedure. The levetiracetam concentration inversely correlated with body surface area (BSA) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Levetiracetam was superior to phenytoin in terms of the correlation between the serum concentration and the dose adjusted for BSA and eGFR (correlation coefficient, 0.49 vs 0.21). Furthermore, the serum levetiracetam concentration in patients with intraoperative seizures was below the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the regression line whereas the serum phenytoin concentration of two patients with seizures was within the 95% CI, indicating that evaluating the serum levetiracetam concentration against the BSA and eGFR-adjusted dosage may be useful in preventing intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy by allowing prediction of the seizure risk and enabling more accurate dosage calibration.

Predictive Performance of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Levetiracetam in Children and Evaluation of Dosing Regimen.

Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug that exhibits high interindividual variability in serum concentrations in children. A population pharmacokinetic approach can be used to explain this variability and optimize dosing schemes. The objectives are to identify the best predictive population pharmacokinetic model for children and to evaluate recommended doses using simulations and Bayesian forecasting. A validation cohort included children treated with levetiracetam who had a serum drug concentration assayed during therapeutic drug monitoring. We assessed the predictive performance of all the population pharmacokinetic models published in the literature using mean prediction errors, root mean squared errors, and visual predictive checks. A population model was finally constructed on the data, and dose simulations were performed to evaluate doses. We included 267 levetiracetam concentrations ranging from 2 to 69 mg/L from 194 children in the validation cohort. Six published models were externally evaluated. Most of the models underestimated the variability of our population. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with allometric scaling was finally fitted on our data. In our cohort, 57% of patients had a trough concentration <12 mg/L and 12% <5 mg/L. To reach a trough concentration >5 mg/L, doses ≥30 mg/kg/d for patients ≤50 kg and ≥2000 mg/d for patients >50 kg are required. In our population, a high percentage of children had low trough concentrations. Our population pharmacokinetic model could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam in children.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lamotrigine, Lacosamide, and Levetiracetam in Dried Capillary Blood-Determination of Conversion Factors for Serum-Based Reference Ranges.

BACKGROUND: Drug concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are routinely determined from blood serum or plasma at trough levels (before intake of morning dose). In capillary blood collection, blood is taken from the fingertip with the aid of a disposable tool and dried on absorbent material. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique offers several advantages over the use of filter paper cards. The aim of this study was to determine conversion factors for the estimation of AED serum concentrations from capillary blood concentrations. METHODS: Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from adult inpatients with epilepsy who were treated with lacosamide (LCM, n = 30), lamotrigine (LTG, n = 40), and/or levetiracetam (LEV, n = 36). A validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method for dried blood samples for these AEDs was compared with routine serum laboratory methods. Method agreement was evaluated using different regression techniques, and the conversion factors were calculated. RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed a linear relationship between serum and capillary blood concentrations for all 3 AEDs (r ≥ 0.95). For LTG, the regression intercept was significantly different from 0, indicating that the relationship was linear, but not necessarily proportional. Although LEV and LCM concentrations tended to be lower in capillary blood than in serum (mean ratio of serum concentration to capillary blood concentration: 1.14 and 1.22, respectively), LTG concentrations were higher in capillary blood (mean ratio = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of serum concentrations from measured capillary blood concentrations is feasible for LCM, LTG, and LEV. A simple ratio approach using the mean ratio and Passing-Bablok regression showed the best results for all 3 AEDs. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique facilitates the quantitative sample collection of capillary blood and overcomes the drawbacks associated with the classical dried blood spot technique.

A pharmacokinetic simulation study to assess the performance of a sparse blood sampling approach to quantify early drug exposure.

Estimating early exposure of drugs used for the treatment of emergent conditions is challenging because blood sampling to measure concentrations is difficult. The objective of this work was to evaluate predictive performance of two early concentrations and prior pharmacokinetic (PK) information for estimating early exposure. The performance of a modeling approach was compared with a noncompartmental analysis (NCA). A simulation study was performed using literature-based models for phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA). These models were used to simulate rich concentration-time profiles from 0 to 2 h. Profiles without residual unexplained variability (RUV) were used to obtain the true partial area under the curve (pAUC) until 2 h after the start of drug infusion. From the profiles with the RUV, two concentrations per patient were randomly selected. These concentrations were analyzed under a population model to obtain individual population PK (PopPK) pAUCs. The NCA pAUCs were calculated using a linear trapezoidal rule. Percent prediction errors (PPEs) for the PopPK pAUCs and NCA pAUCs were calculated. A PPE within ±20% of the true value was considered a success and the number of successes was obtained for 100 simulated datasets. For PHT, LEV, and VPA, respectively, the median value of the success statistics obtained using the PopPK approach of 81%, 92%, and 88% were significantly higher than the 72%, 80%, and 67% using the NCA approach (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test). This study provides a means by which early exposure can be estimated with good precision from two concentrations and a PopPK approach. It can be applied to other settings in which early exposures are of interest.

A Direct Injection Technique to Improve Biosafety to Analyze Levetiracetam Concentrations in Human Serum and Its Application in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: With the outbreak of COVID-19, it has become very important to improve biosafety measures taken by medical staff. Fewer pretreatment steps correspond to lower chances of infection. The authors established a direct injection technique to analyze levetiracetam (LEV) concentrations in human serum and studied its application in therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Serum samples were prepared by hollow fiber centrifugal ultrafiltration and the filtrate was directly injected into a ultra-high performance liquid chromatography apparatus (Waters UPLC BEH C18 column: 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) for analysis. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and water (8:92) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 30°C. The detected wavelength was 210 nm. RESULTS: A linear relationship was obtained for LEV from 0.625 to 80 mcg/mL (r2 = 0.999). The limit of detection for the analysis of LEV was 0.125 mcg/mL. The analysis time was shortened to 4 minutes. The recovery rate of LEV based on the current method was 96.6%-100.1%, whereas the absolute recovery rate was 93.2%-96.8%. The relative SD of intraday and interday precision was <7.3%. Stability was achieved at room temperature for 24 hours after 3 freeze-thaw cycles and at -80°C for 21 days. The method was successfully applied to determine LEV concentrations in the serum of 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present method is simple, accurate, and sensitive, and can improve biosafety with the direct injection technique. It is suitable for the analysis of LEV concentrations in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Impact of ABCB1 Polymorphism on Levetiracetam Serum Concentrations in Epileptic Uygur Children in China.

BACKGROUND: Interindividual variations in the efficacy of antiseizure medications make epilepsy treatment challenging. This is due to genetic factors such as gene polymorphisms in Adenosine-triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1). In this article, the impact of polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein-encoding gene, ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, and C3435T), on levetiracetam disposition was evaluated in Uygur Chinese children with epilepsy. METHODS: MDR1 C3435T polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-fluorescence staining in situ hybridization. The χ test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the allelic and genotypic distribution of ABCB1, C1236T, G2677T, and C3435T between the drug-resistant and drug-responsive groups. Differences in steady-state and dose-corrected levetiracetam serum concentrations between the different genotypes were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Total 245 Uygur children with epilepsy were analyzed [drug-resistant, n = 117 (males:females = 53:64) and drug-responsive, n = 128 (males:females = 76:52)]. The frequency of ABCB1 C1236T, G2677T/A, and ABCB1 C3435T genotypes, alleles, haplotypes, or diplotypes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Significantly higher levetiracetam concentrations and serum concentration/body mass dose were seen in ABCB1 2677-GT, TT, GA, and AT genotypes and 3435-TT carriers compared with GG and CC carriers (P = 0.021 and P = 0.002 versus P = 0.001 and P = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T may affect levetiracetam disposition and therapeutic efficacy in Uygur children with epilepsy. Genetic analysis could be a valuable tool for predicting the response to antiseizure medications before the start of treatment and could contribute to personalized medicine for Uygur children with epilepsy.

Determination of levetiracetam in human plasma by online heart-cutting liquid chromatography: Application to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug for the treatment of psychiatric patients. In this study, a selective, straightforward, and rapid online heart-cutting liquid chromatography method was developed for the therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam. This method allows for the determination of levetiracetam in human plasma without complex sample preparation. The mobile phases consisted of 30 mM aq. orthophosphoric acid solution/methanol (70:30) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min for the first system and 10 mM aq. orthophosphoric acid solution/methanol (55:45) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min for the second system. The first separation was carried out on a GL Sciences Intersil ODS-3 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3 µm) and the second separation was carried out on a Restek Ultra PFPP column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 µm). The detection was carried out at 205 nm for both systems. The method was validated for selectivity and linearity, which were in the 6-60 µg/mL range. Intra- and interassay accuracies were <112.6%, and the intra- and interassay precisions were <6.4% for all quality control samples. The lower limit of quantitation was 6 µg/mL. The developed method was successfully applied for therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma samples from patients.

Pharmacokinetic Variability During Long-Term Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam in Patients With Dravet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiseizure medications (ASMs) may contribute to treatment optimization in individual patients. This study included patients with Dravet syndrome as they often require close monitoring because of polypharmacy with various ASMs. The aim was to use long-term TDM to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of ASMs in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with Dravet syndrome were collected from the TDM database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2008-2018). Concentration/(dose/kg)ratios (C/D ratios) were calculated for the ASMs and the concentration (C/C ratio) for N-desmethylclobazam. In patients with at least 3 measurements, the CV for C/D ratios for intrapatient and interpatient variability was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (30 male patients/23 female patients) between 2 and 50 years of age (mean, 16 years) were included. Pharmacokinetic variability of the total number of measurements of valproate (n = 417), clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (n = 328), and levetiracetam (n = 238) was determined. Interpatient variability was more pronounced than intrapatient variability (coefficient of variations: valproate, 65% vs. 24%; levetiracetam, 71% vs. 27%; and clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, 47%/77% vs. 35%/55%) (P < 0.01). Comedication with stiripentol (n = 16) increased the C/D ratio of valproate by 63% and of clobazam by 133% and the C/C ratio of N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam by 104% (P < 0.05). Younger age also contributed to pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term TDM revealed extensive variability in serum concentrations over time; the variability was lowest for levetiracetam, moderate for valproate, and highest for clobazam. Pharmacokinetic variability and interactions can thus be identified and adjusted to facilitate decision making to achieve the optimal treatment outcome.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam in daily clinical practice: high-performance liquid chromatography versus immunoassay.

Objectives: Although levetiracetam presents an easy dosing and tolerability, therapeutic drug monitoring may be recommended in certain situations. Measurement of levetiracetam in serum plasma is commonly done by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). After ARK Diagnostics marketed an enzyme immunoassay (IA) for levetiracetam in serum or plasma, automated determinations are possible. In this study, the performance of this immunoassay and the impact of automation on the follow-up in patients treated with levetiracetam is evaluated. We also detected those subpopulations of patients who may benefit the most from this therapeutic drug monitoring. Methods: Samples from 50 outpatients diagnosed with epilepsy and treated with levetiracetam were collected. This new IA was performed on the Architect c4000 analyser and compared with the HPLC. Then, a retrospective observational study that included serum samples of levetiracetam for 24 months, was conducted to evaluate the impact of automattion and the influence of some variables (age, sex, renal function, and co-administration of valproic acid and glucuronidation-inducing drugs) in levetiracetam apparent oral clearance (CLp/F) by a multivariate linear regression. Results: The mean high-performance liquid chromatography quantified concentration (CpHPLC) was 18.43 mcg/mL (95% CI: 15.48 to 21.39) and immunoassay concentration (CpEI) was 18.35 mcg/mL (95% CI: 15.20 to 21.50) (P=0.861). The Pearson's linear correlation coefficient obtained in the analysis was r2=0.88, according to the following equation: CpHPLC=-0.29+1.01 CpEI. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91 to 0.97). After IA implementation, the number of levetiracetam determinations increased in 76.27%. The median of Clp/F was higher (P<0.001) in inducers (4.36 L/h; IQR:3.29-5.44) and lower (P<0.001) in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min (2.7 L/h; IQR: 0.58-3.85). Conclusions: The Ark method performed on the Architect is fully acceptable and can be used routinely to measure levetiracetam plasmatic concentration levels. It has demonstrated the need for closer monitoring in patients with renal failure or co-administration of glucuronidation-inducing drugs.

Correlation of levetiracetam concentration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with clinical efficacy: A sensitive monitoring biomarker in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly recommended in antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy, yet a complex relationship exists between the unbound-drug serum concentration (Cu.serum) as a monitoring biomarker and clinical efficacy. The study was designed to investigate the validity of the intracellular unbound-drug concentration in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (Cu.PBMC) as a feasible TDM tool in relation to levetiracetam (LEV). METHODS: Patients from epilepsy out-patient centre were included in a 4-month descriptive prospective study. Trough serum and PBMC LEV concentrations were monthly determined using HPLC and correlated with clinical features, demographic data, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression. RESULTS: Seventy-patients completed the study with a LEV dose range of 500-3000 mg/day. An absolute range for LEV Cu.serum and Cu.PBMC was 1.00-26.99 and 0.33-4.43 µg/mL, respectively. Unlike Cu.serum, the average four-month LEV Cu.PBMC displayed a significant positive correlation with clinical features and P-gp expression; where patients with higher LEV Cu.PBMC experienced less number of seizure/month, better cognition and quality of life, and had a more reduction in P-gp expression, but no significant correlation with LEV daily dose was observed. A therapeutic response threshold of ≥ 0.82 µg/mL for LEV Cu.PBMCwas perceived by using a receiver operating characteristic curve that related the number of seizure/month to the LEV Cu.PBMC. The validity of this therapeutic threshold was significant in contrast to LEV Cu.serum. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam PBMC concentration is a more sensitive biomarker for LEV efficacy and correlates better with clinical events than Cu.serum and could represent a novel tool for more precise LEV monitoring.

Pharmacological monitoring of antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy patients on haemodialysis.

To retrospectively evaluate the pharmacological profiles of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in epilepsy patients during haemodialysis using therapeutic drug monitoring data. The serum concentration of AEDs was collected before and after haemodialysis, and the clearance rate and concentration-to-dose ratio were calculated as pharmacological parameters. Thirty-six patients were enrolled in the study (25 males, 11 females; age: 65.3 ± 14.8 years). In 24 of the 36 patients, epilepsy was associated with cerebrovascular disorders, and diabetes was the most common reason for haemodialysis in 16 patients. With regards to seizure type, focal aware seizures were less frequent than focal impaired awareness seizures and focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Interictal EEG showed intermittent rhythmic slow waves and intermittent slow waves more often than spikes or sharp waves. Levetiracetam was the most commonly used AED and led to the highest percentage of responders (80%; 16/20 patients). However, the clearance rate of levetiracetam during dialysis was highest among the antiepileptic drugs used, requiring supplementary doses after haemodialysis in all 20 patients. Valproic acid was not effective for focal epilepsy for patients on haemodialysis, and non-responders to phenytoin had low serum concentration of phenytoin both before and after haemodialysis. The pre-haemodialysis concentration of levetiracetam tended to be higher than the reference range, suggesting a potential risk of overdosing before haemodialysis. The pre- and post-haemodialysis concentrations of valproic acid tended to be lower than the reference range, suggesting a potential risk of underdosing. The concentration-to-dose ratios for levetiracetam, valproic acid, phenytoin, and carbamazepine were significantly lower after than before haemodialysis. The majority of patients with epilepsy on haemodialysis had cerebrovascular diseases, and therapeutic drug monitoring for levetiracetam, valproic acid, and phenytoin, before and after haemodialysis, is needed to ensure proper dosing.

Clinical Impact of Co-medication of Levetiracetam and Clobazam with Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Drug Interaction Study.

BACKGROUND: Clobazam (CLBZ) metabolized primarily by Cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 than with CYP2C19, Whereas Levetiracetam (LEV) is metabolized by hydrolysis of the acetamide group. Few CYP enzymes are inhibited by Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Pantoprazole, Esomeprazole, and Rabeprazole in different extents that could affect drug concentrations in blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of these PPIs on the plasma concentrations of LEV and CLBZ. METHODS: Blood samples from 542 patients were included out of which 343 were male and 199 were female patients and were categorized as control and test. Plasma samples analyzed using an HPLC-UV method. Plasma concentrations were measured and compared to those treated and those not treated with PPIs. One way ANOVA and games Howell post hoc test used by SPSS 20 software. RESULTS: CLBZ concentrations were significantly 10 folds higher in patients treated with Pantoprazole (P=0.000) and 07 folds higher in patients treated with Esmoprazole and Rabeprazole (P=0.00). Whereas plasma concentration of LEV control group has no statistical and significant difference when compared to pantoprazole (P=0.546) and with rabeprazole and esomeprazole was P=0.999. CONCLUSION: The effect of comedication with PPIs on the plasma concentration of clobazam is more pronounced for pantoprazole to a greater extent when compared to esomeprazole and rabeprazole. When pantoprazole is used in combination with clobazam, dose reduction of clobazam should be considered, or significance of PPIs is seen to avoid adverse effects.

What Are the Predictors for Achieving Therapeutic Levetiracetam Serum Concentrations in Adult Neurological Patients?

BACKGROUND: Emerging studies suggest that levetiracetam pharmacokinetics can be difficult to predict in certain special patient populations, including the elderly, critically ill patients, and pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical characteristics that predict the attainment of target serum concentrations in a heterogeneous group of patients prescribed levetiracetam. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in adult neurological patients prescribed levetiracetam for the treatment or prophylaxis of seizures. Serum samples were collected after steady-state was reached, with a trough/steady-state serum concentration between 6 and 20 mg/L considered therapeutic. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors associated with the attainment of therapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: One-hundred thirty patients (63 male) were included. The median (interquartile ranges) serum trough/steady-state concentration (Cmin/ss) was 16.2 (9.8-26.1) mg/L. The dose-normalized median (interquartile range) Cmin/ss was 11.5 (7.0-16.5) mg/L. The coefficient of variation of Cmin/ss and dose-normalized Cmin/ss were 69.4% and 64.2%, respectively. A weak correlation was observed between levetiracetam Cmin/ss and patient age (r = 0.21; P = 0.020), creatinine clearance (r = -0.26; P = 0.004), and daily dose (r = 0.42; P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified age and daily levetiracetam dose as significant factors predicting target Cmin/ss attainment. The influence of concomitant antiepileptic therapy was not determined. CONCLUSIONS: Age and daily dose were the most significant predictors of levetiracetam target-concentration attainment and should be considered in further investigations to develop a dosing algorithm for optimal levetiracetam therapy.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics of intragastrically and intrarectally administered levetiracetam tablets in healthy non-epileptic dogs.

Canine status epilepticus (CSE) is characterized by epileptic seizures that are longer than 5 min or more than one seizure with incomplete recovery. Currently, diazepam suppositories are generally prescribed for CSE. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the newest antiepileptic drugs currently available. This study compared the pharmacokinetics of intragastric and intrarectal administration in oral formula of LEV in four healthy beagles as a reference data when the owner administers levetiracetam to dogs by himself at home. Blood for measuring plasma LEV concen- trations was collected 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, 360, and 540 min after LEV administration. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was markedly shorter with intra- rectal administration (45±26 min) than with intragastric administration (270±99 min). Intrarectal administration of LEV tablets could be an effective option for treating canine seizures although it might be a limit for treating CSE because the absorption rate is not fast enough.

[Maintenance of plasma levels of levetiracetam in subcutaneous, continuous and prolonged palliative infusion by elastomeric infusors]. / Mantenimiento de niveles plasmáticos de levetiracetam en infusión paliativa subcutánea, continua y prolongada mediante infusores elastoméricos.

TITLE: Mantenimiento de niveles plasmáticos de levetiracetam en infusión paliativa subcutánea, continua y prolongada mediante infusores elastoméricos.