Effectiveness of oritavancin for management of skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department: A case series.

Skin and soft tissue infections, such as cellulitis, are commonly diagnosed in the emergency department and these patients are often admitted to the hospital for intravenous antibiotic therapy. Oritavancin is a novel antibiotic approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections that is administered as a one-time infusion. While oritavancin has demonstrated comparable efficacy with multi-dose parenteral antibiotics in clinical trials and has been proposed as an alternative to admission for emergency department patients, there is a paucity of available real world effectiveness data. In this case series, we describe the characteristics and outcomes of ten patients with high-risk skin and soft tissue infections who received oritavancin and were discharged from the emergency department.

Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of telavancin in obesity with renal impairment.

PURPOSE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended telavancin dosing is based on total body weight (TBW) but lacks adjusted regimens for obese subjects with varying renal function. Our aim was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of telavancin to design optimized dosing regimens for obese patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and varying renal function. METHODS: The PBPK model was verified using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data of telavancin in healthy populations with varying renal function and obese populations with normal renal function. Then, the PBPK model was applied to predict the PK in obese HAP patients with renal impairment (RI). RESULTS: The fold error values of PK parameters (AUC, Cmax, Tmax) were all within 1.5. The telavancin AUC0-inf was predicted to increase 1.07-fold in mild RI, 1.23-fold in moderate RI, 1.41-fold in severe RI, and 1.57-fold in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), compared with that in obese HAP with normal renal function. The PBPK model combined with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) suggested that dose adjustment based on a 750-mg-fixed dose could achieve effectiveness with reduced risk of toxicity, compared with current TBW-based dosing recommendations. CONCLUSION: The PBPK simulation proposed that using TBW-based regimen in obesity with RI should be avoided. Dose recommendations in obesity from the PBPK model are 750 mg daily for normal renal function and mild RI, 610 mg daily for moderate RI, 530 mg daily for severe RI, and 480 mg daily for ESRD.

Role or oritavancin and dalbavancin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and other potential indications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the currently available evidence about the use oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and for other potential indications. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies) pertaining to the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin either for ABSSSI or for other indications. SUMMARY: Oritavancin and dalbavancin are valid options for outpatient therapy and early discharge in patients with ABSSSI, especially when adherence to oral therapy cannot be guaranteed or no oral choices are available. Furthermore, it is worth noting that a non-negligible portion (sometimes the majority) of oritavancin and dalbavancin use in available real-life experiences is for indications other than ABSSSI, especially for Gram-positive osteomyelitis and endocarditis. The number of studies on the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides for these currently off-label indications is rapidly increasing and will help to further optimize the use of these peculiar antibiotics in the forthcoming future.

Impact of clinical decision support on oritavancin prescribing in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) have been on the rise and have led to an increased clinical and economic burden. Owing to their single-dose regimen, recently approved lipoglycopeptides such as oritavancin have the potential to shift the management of SSTIs from an inpatient to outpatient setting. Limited data exist regarding the use of these drugs in the ED setting. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the impact that clinical decision support (CDS) incorporation into the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system had on oritavancin use and to assess compliance with appropriate use guidelines in the ED. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who received oritavancin from September 2016 to May 2018. The patients were assigned to the pre-CDS-implementation group if oritavancin was used between September 13, 2016, and June 28, 2017 and to the post-CDS-implementation group if oritavancin was used between August 28, 2017, and May 25, 2018. There was a 2-month transition period between the 2 study time periods. Patients were excluded if the administration occurred outside of the ED or during the transition period. The primary endpoints were oritavancin use and compliance with the appropriate use guidelines after the implementation. RESULTS: There were 169 oritavancin orders in total, of which 119 met the inclusion criteria. There was a marked decrease in use post-CDS implementation (9.2 orders/mo vs. 3 orders/mo). Among those who were prescribed oritavancin, compliance with the appropriate use guidelines increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the appropriate use guidelines with CDS integration into the CPOE system decreased overall oritavancin use but did not have an impact on compliance with the appropriate use guidelines.

Advantages of Outpatient Treatment with Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: A Review.

Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.

Real-world use of telavancin in the treatment of osteomyelitis.

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with osteomyelitis who received telavancin at some time during their treatment course. The primary outcome was the percent of patients cured or improved at the end of telavancin therapy (EOTT). The secondary outcome was the percent of patients cured or improved three months after discontinuation of telavancin therapy. There were 32 cases of osteomyelitis with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identified in 17 (56.7%), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 2(6.6%), coagulase negative staphylococci 6 (20.0%) and other pathogens, 5 (16.7%). At EOTT, 87.5% of patients had their osteomyelitis cured and 94.6% had the infection cured at three months after telavancin was completed. The most common adverse events associated with telavancin were gastrointestinal in nature (nausea (25.8%), vomiting (9.7%) and diarrhea (3.2%)) followed by metallic taste (6.5%). A favorable outcome was achieved for many patients receiving the antimicrobial regimen that included telavancin for the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal therapy for serious enterococcal infections, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), remains unclear, although combination therapy is often recommended. Oritavancin has demonstrated in-vitro activity against VRE, but data evaluating oritavancin in combination with other agents and in in-vivo systems are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oritavancin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, daptomycin, gentamicin, linezolid and rifampin against vancomycin-susceptible enterococci and VRE in an in-vivo Galleria mellonella survival model. METHODS: Five enterococcal strains were used: three clinical isolates (VRE S38141, VRE H19570, VRE W21579), Enterococcus faecium ATCC 700221 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. G. mellonella larvae were inoculated with the test strain followed by the test drug at humanized weight-based dose alone or in combination within 1 h of inoculation. After injection, larvae were incubated at 37°C and survival was measured daily for 7 days. Survival was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were determined via the log-rank test. Mean survival times were also determined. RESULTS: Each single agent improved survival significantly compared with the untreated control strain. Oritavancin was the most efficacious single agent, and led to a significant increase in survival compared with ceftriaxone, gentamicin and daptomycin. Compared with oritavancin alone, none of the oritavancin combinations tested were significantly better, and mean survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Oritavancin monotherapy had the highest survival rate at 7 days, and none of the combinations tested showed improved survival over oritavancin alone. These data add to the body of literature rebutting the routine use of combination therapy with oritavancin for the treatment of infections due to VRE.

Oritavancin polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-compressive strength testing and in vitro elution.

BACKGROUND: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is used for local antimicrobial delivery in orthopedic infection. Oritavancin is a long half-life lipoglycopeptide with broad activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Herein, we addressed if 7.5% w/w oritavancin mixed into PMMA affects PMMA strength and whether it elutes from PMMA, compared to vancomycin. METHODS: Elution was assessed by placing an oritavancin- or vancomycin-loaded bead in a flow system with human plasma. Compressive strength of bland compared to oritavancin- or vancomycin-loaded PMMA was assessed after 0, 3, and 7 days of soaking in 1 ml of pooled normal human plasma at 37 °C, by testing to failure in axial compression using a servo-hydraulic testing machine. RESULTS: Median compressive strength on days 0, 3, and 7 for bland PMMA compared to oritavancin- or vancomycin-loaded PMMA was 80.1, 79.4, and 72.4 MPa, respectively; 93.3, 86.4, and 65.3 MPa, respectively; and 97.8, 82.7, and 65.9 MPa, respectively. Oritavancin reduced PMMA compressive strength after 3 and 7 days (P = 0.0250 and 0.0039, respectively), whereas vancomycin reduced the PMMA compressive strength after 0, 3, and 7 days (P = 0.0039, 0.0039, and 0.0062, respectively) as compared to bland PMMA. Oritavancin-loaded PMMA had higher compressive strength than vancomycin-loaded PMMA on days 3 and 7 (P = 0.0039 and 0.0062, respectively). Compressive elastic moduli were 1226, 1299, and 1394 MPa for bland PMMA; 1253, 1078, and 1245 MPa for oritavancin-loaded PMMA; and 986, 879, and 779 MPa for vancomycin-loaded PMMA on days 0, 3 and 7, respectively. Oritavancin-loaded PMMA had higher compressive elastic moduli than vancomycin-loaded PMMA on days 0 and 7 (P = 0.0250 and 0.0062, respectively). Following polymerization, 1.0% and 51.9% of the initial amount of oritavancin and vancomycin were detected, respectively. Cmax, Tmax, and AUC0-24 were 1.7 µg/ml, 2 h, and 11.4 µg/ml for oritavancin and 21.4 µg/ml, 2 h, and 163.9 µg/ml for vancomycin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oritavancin-loaded PMMA had higher compressive strength than vancomycin-loaded PMMA on days 3 and 7 and higher compressive elastic moduli than vancomycin-loaded PMMA on days 0 and 7. However, proportionally less oritavancin than vancomycin eluted out of PMMA.

Use of telavancin in adolescent patients with cystic fibrosis and prior intolerance to vancomycin: A case series.

The most common pathogen in pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is Staphylococcus aureus, and drug-resistant species are associated with negative outcomes. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is notoriously hard to treat because many antibiotics are not FDA approved for children and drug allergies or intolerances can prohibit the use of others. Telavancin is currently indicated for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by MRSA, but it has not been studied in patients with CF or in pediatrics. As a semi-synthetic derivative of vancomycin, it is unknown if cross-reactivity with telavancin occurs in patients with vancomycin hypersensitivity or intolerance. In this case series, we describe three adolescent patients with CF and previous intolerance to vancomycin who received telavancin for bronchopulmonary exacerbations.

Time Course and Extent of Renal Function Changes in Patients Receiving Treatment for Staphylococcal Pneumonias: An Analysis Comparing Telavancin and Vancomycin from the ATTAIN Trials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Telavancin and vancomycin are both approved for treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus, and both agents can cause renal dysfunction. The objective of this study was to assess renal function changes by performing renal shift table analyses of telavancin- and vancomycin-treated patients in phase III trials. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive analysis of data from the safety population from the Assessment of Telavancin for Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (ATTAIN) trials. PATIENTS: A total of 1503 adults with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia primarily caused by gram-positive pathogens and who received telavancin (n = 751) or vancomycin (n = 752). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Decline or improvement in creatinine clearance (CrCl) across seven defined categories (≤30, >30-40, >40-50, >50-60, >60-70, >70-80, and >80 ml/min) was classified as negative or positive shifts, respectively. The number of categories crossed (either positive or negative) determined the grade of shift (of a potential grades 1-6, with crossing from one category to the next adjacent category defined as a grade 1 shift) at specific time points compared with baseline: day 4, day 7, and end of therapy (EOT). Approximately 77%-91.6% of patients had either no change or improvement of CrCl across all time points for both treatments. Negative shifts were consistent for telavancin (day 4, 19.3%; day 7, 19.0%; EOT, 23.0%) but increased over time for vancomycin (day 4, 8.4%; day 7, 12.3%; EOT, 19.3%). A significantly lower proportion of patients receiving vancomycin showed renal function decline on day 4 and day 7. At EOT, negative shift rates were similar between treatments (treatment difference 3.6% [95% CI -0.7 to 7.9]). At day 7 and EOT, a higher percentage of vancomycin-treated patients experienced high-grade negative shifts relative to telavancin (day 7, vancomycin 2.8% vs telavancin 1.9%; EOT, vancomycin 4.7% vs telavancin 4.1%), though differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Use of shift tables revealed differences in timing of renal function changes in patients receiving telavancin and vancomycin. Telavancin-related declines in renal function were similar at day 4 and day 7, with a slight increase by EOT. This differed from vancomycin, which caused a steady increase in the percentage of patients with renal function decline over time. A significant difference in negative renal shifts between treatments occurred at day 4 and day 7 and favored vancomycin; however, the difference was minimal and not significant at EOT.

Single Intravenous Dose of Oritavancin for Treatment of Acute Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: Summary of Safety Analysis from the Phase 3 SOLO Studies.

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms. Its rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and long elimination half-life allow single-dose treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). SOLO I and SOLO II were randomized, double-blind studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single 1,200-mg intravenous (i.v.) dose of oritavancin versus twice-daily i.v. vancomycin for 7 to 10 days in ABSSSI patients. Safety data from both studies were pooled for safety analysis. The database comprised pooled safety data for 976 oritavancin-treated patients and 983 vancomycin-treated patients. The incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events were similar for oritavancin (55.3, 5.8, and 3.7%, respectively) and vancomycin (56.9, 5.9, and 4.2%, respectively). The median time to onset (3.8 days versus 3.1 days, respectively) and the duration (3.0 days for both groups) of adverse events were also similar between the two groups. The most frequently reported events were nausea, headache, and vomiting. Greater than 90% of all events were mild or moderate in severity. There were slightly more infections and infestations, abscesses or cellulitis, and hepatic and cardiac adverse events in the oritavancin group; however, more than 80% of these events were mild or moderate. Subgroup analyses did not identify clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of adverse events attributed to oritavancin. A single 1,200-mg dose of oritavancin was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of twice-daily vancomycin. The long elimination half-life of oritavancin compared to that of vancomycin did not result in a clinically meaningful delay to the onset or prolongation of adverse events. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01252719 and NCT01252732.).

Multiple-Dose Oritavancin Evaluation in a Retrospective Cohort of Patients with Complicated Infections.

OBJECTIVE: Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for use in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections as a single 1200-mg parenteral dose. Because of oritavancin's long half-life and broad gram-positive activity, interest in its use for other infections is high. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort evaluation of patients receiving oritavancin at a single academic medical center. All patients receiving more than one dose of oritavancin were included. Patients were excluded if therapy was interrupted by more than 14 days. Efficacy, defined a priori as clinical success, improvement, or failure, and adverse drug effect outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received multiple oritavancin doses (range 2-18 doses) for the treatment of complicated infections including osteomyelitis, surgical site infection, intravascular infections, and pneumonia. All patients achieved clinical success or improvement with oritavancin. Four patients (24%) had an adverse event requiring oritavancin discontinuation that reversed rapidly. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label oritavancin use may be a safe and effective alternative to daily antibiotic infusions to treat complicated infectious disease processes. This study is limited by small sample size and retrospective design, but it provides information on using oritavancin in these complex gram-positive infections.

Telavancin for refractory MRSA bacteraemia in intermittent haemodialysis recipients.

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) are at high risk of MRSA bacteraemia (MRSA-B) and often fail first-line therapy. The safety, effectiveness and optimal dosing of telavancin for MRSA-B in this patient population are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to describe clinical outcomes of telavancin in the treatment of refractory MRSA-B in patients with ESRD requiring IHD. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of hospitalized patients at two tertiary care academic medical centres with recurrent or persistent (≥3 days) MRSA-B treated with telavancin monotherapy. Outcomes included duration of MRSA-B (pre-telavancin versus post-telavancin) and microbiological failure (duration of MRSA-B ≥3 days after initiation of telavancin). Results: Telavancin dosed 10 mg/kg three times weekly post-IHD or 10 mg/kg every 48 h resulted in microbiological cure in 7/8 (87.5%) refractory MRSA-B cases. Telavancin monotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in median duration of bacteraemia [16 days pre-telavancin (IQR 8-19 days) versus 1 day post-telavancin (IQR 0-2 days); P = 0.018]. Telavancin was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Telavancin was very safe and highly effective in the treatment of refractory MRSA-B in a cohort of patients with ESRD requiring IHD. These data support the utility of telavancin in the armamentarium against refractory MRSA-B, particularly in the high-risk IHD-dependent population.