Biological variation of lipoprotein(a) in a diabetic population. Analysis of the causes and clinical implications.

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the biological variability of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in diabetic patients and to investigate the biological sources of this variability. Lp(a) was measured by ELISA in four serum specimens collected in 3-month intervals from 70 patients. The other parameters analyzed were: total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, glucose, HbA and albumin excretion rate. The overall biological within-subject variance (CVb) was 31.7%, and it was inversely correlated with Lp(a) serum levels. According to the initial ranges of Lp(a) serum levels (< 15, 15-30 and > 30 mg/dl) the CVb were 42.3%, 24.1% and 23.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis the total intra-individual coefficient of variation (CVt) of triglycerides and the CVt of the albumin excretion rate (AER) were independently associated with the CVb of Lp(a) (R2 = 0.54). The intra-individual biological variation of Lp(a) produced a misclassification of 20% of diabetic patients for cardiovascular risk attributable to this lipoprotein. In conclusion, the higher biological variability of Lp(a) observed in diabetic patients suggests that a single determination could be inaccurate to assess the cardiovascular risk associated with this lipoprotein, at least in those patients in whom serum levels are near the cut-off considered as risk for cardiovascular disease (> 30 mg/dl). Finally, triglycerides and AER are the main factors influencing Lp(a) serum levels in the diabetic population.

Relationship of non-LDL-bound apo(a), urinary apo(a) fragments and plasma Lp(a) in patients with impaired renal function.

BACKGROUND: Plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been shown to be a risk factor for atherosclerosis in numerous studies. However, the catabolism of this lipoprotein is not very clear. We and others have shown that Lp(a) is excreted into urine in the form of fragments. Lp(a) has also been shown to exist in a low-density non-lipoprotein (LDL)-bound form. Since Lp(a) is increased in all forms of kidney disease with reduced excretory kidney function and decreased excretion of apo(a) fragments could be partially responsible for this increase, we investigated the relationship of non-LDL-bound apo(a), urinary apo(a) fragments and plasma Lp(a) in patients with impaired renal function. METHODS: Plasma Lp(a), non-LDL-bound apo(a) and urinary apo(a) fragments were measured in 55 kidney disease patients (28 males and 27 females) and matched controls. RESULTS: Plasma Lp(a) and non-LDL-bound apo(a) were increased in patients, whereas urinary apo(a) was decreased, especially in patients with a creatinine clearance < 70 ml/min. There was a significant correlation between plasma Lp(a) and non-LDL-bound apo(a) in patients and controls. CONCLUSION: We conclude that decreased urinary apo(a) excretion could be one possible mechanism of increased plasma Lp(a) and non-LDL-bound apo(a) in patients with decreased kidney function.

Urinary excretion of apolipoprotein(a): relation to other plasma proteins.

The atherogenic lipoprotein Lp(a) consists of an LDL-like core and apo(a), linked to apoB via a thiol bridge. Apo(a) fragments ranging in size from 60 to 220 kDa are excreted into urine and the excretion rate correlates significantly with the plasma levels of Lp(a). In order to study the interrelationship of apo(a) secretion with that of other plasma proteins, urinary apo(a) and protein secretion of five probands were followed for 24 h at different urinary densities. The excretion rate of apo(a) fragments, despite their high molecular weight, was highest, followed by apoD, orosomucoid, albumin and beta(2)-glycoprotein-I (beta2-GI) and plasminogen (1.58, 0.87, 0.095, 0.027, 0.013 and <0.001%/day, respectively). There was a highly significant correlation between apo(a), apoD and beta2-GI concentrations but not with albumin and orosomucoid concentrations in urine. The only protein that was fragmented in urine was apo(a) while the other proteins had molecular weights comparable to those in plasma. We conclude that a previously suggested fragmentation of apo(a) by the kidney is not a rate-limiting step in its excretion. Since plasminogen, another kringle-IV-containing plasma compound, and fragments thereof, are undetectable in urine under identical experimental conditions, it is very unlikely that the characteristic kringle structure is responsible for the high excretion rate of apo(a).

Lipoprotein(a) in the nephrotic syndrome: molecular analysis of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) fragments in plasma and urine.

Plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), an atherogenic particle, are elevated in kidney disease, which suggests a role of this organ in the metabolism of Lp(a). Additional evidence for a role of the kidney in the clearance of Lp(a) is provided by the fact that circulating N-terminal fragments of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) are processed and eliminated by the renal route. To further understand the mechanism underlying such renal excretion, the levels of apo(a) fragments in plasma and urine relative to plasma Lp(a) levels were determined in patients with nephrotic syndrome (n = 15). In plasma, the absolute (24.7 +/- 20.4 versus 2.16 +/- 2.99 microg/ml, P < 0.0001) as well as the relative amounts of apo(a) fragments (4.6 +/-3.4% versus 2.1 +/- 3.3% of total Lp(a), P < 0.0001) were significantly elevated in nephrotic patients compared with a control, normolipidemic population. In addition, urinary apo(a) excretion in patients with nephrotic syndrome was markedly elevated compared with that in control subjects (578 +/- 622 versus 27.7 +/- 44 ng/ml per mg creatinine, P < 0.001). However, the fractional catabolic rates of apo(a) fragments were similar in both groups (0.68 +/- 0.67% and 0.62 +/- 0.47% in nephrotic and control subjects, respectively), suggesting that increased plasma concentrations of apo(a) fragments in nephrotic subjects are more dependent on the rate of synthesis rather than on the catabolic rate. Molecular analysis of apo(a) immunoreactive material in urine revealed that the patterns of apo(a) fragments in nephrotic patients were distinct from those of control subjects. Full-length apo(a), large N-terminal apo(a) fragments similar in size to those present in plasma, as well as C-terminal fragments of apo(a) were detected in urine from nephrotic patients but not in urine from controls. All of these apo(a) forms were in addition to smaller N-terminal apo(a) fragments present in normal urine. This study also demonstrated the presence of Lp(a) in urine from nephrotic patients by ultracentrifugal fractionation. These data suggest that in nephrotic syndrome, Lp(a) and large fragments of apo(a) are passively filtered by the kidney through the glomerulus, whereas smaller apo(a) fragments are secreted into the urine.

Urinary excretion of apolipoprotein(a) fragments in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients.

High levels of plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represent an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity; however, Lp(a) has not yet been identified as a risk factor for type 1 diabetic patients. Results from the limited number of available studies on plasma Lp(a) levels in relation to renal function in type 1 diabetes mellitus are inconclusive. We hypothesized that only type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired renal function show increased plasma Lp(a) levels, due to decreased urinary apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] excretion. We therefore measured urinary apo(a) levels in 52 type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and 52 matched controls, and related the urinary apo(a) concentration to the plasma Lp(a) level, kidney function, and metabolic control. Our findings indicate that patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy as evidenced by microalbuminuria (20 to 200 microg/min) exhibit significantly higher plasma Lp(a) levels (median, 15.6 mg/dL) in comparison to normoalbuminuric patients (median, 10.3 mg/dL) and healthy controls (median, 12.0 mg/dL). Urinary apo(a) normalized to creatinine excretion was significantly elevated in both normoalbuminuric (median, 22.3 microg/dL) and microalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients (median, 29.1 microg/dL) compared with healthy subjects (median, 16.0 microg/dL) and correlated significantly with Lp(a) plasma levels in both patient and control groups (P < .003). No correlation existed between the Lp(a) plasma level or urinary apo(a) concentration and metabolic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. From these studies, we conclude that urinary apo(a) excretion is significantly increased in type 1 diabetic patients and correlates with plasma Lp(a) levels, and only type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria have higher plasma levels of Lp(a) compared with patients with normoalbuminuria and healthy controls.

Standardization and clinical management of lipoprotein(a) measurements.

The present article proposes personal suggestions to improve determinations and clinical interpretation of results of lipoprotein(a) assays. Methods and procedures for sampling and quantification of the various isoforms of lipoprotein(a) in serum, plasma and urine are reviewed with the aim of improving the reliability and reproducibility of results and reinforcing the clinical utility of lipoprotein(a) measurements.

Urinary apo(a) discriminates coronary artery disease patients from controls.

Increased plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels are associated with premature cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Since Lp(a) immune reactivity is found in urine we compared urinary apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) with plasma Lp(a) levels in 116 patients suffering from angiographically proven coronary artery diseases with that of 109 controls. Urinary apo(a) investigated by immuno blotting, revealed a distinct apo(a) fragmentation pattern with molecular weights between 50 and 160 kDa. Apolipoprotein B however was not secreted into urine. Lp(a) and apo(a) were measured by a fluorescence immuno assay. Within single individuals, urinary apo(a) levels correlated significantly with creatinine (Rho, 0.98; P < 0.0005). Medians and 25/75 percentiles of urinary apo(a) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients were 5.70, 3.25 and 10.35 microg/dl and in controls 2.64, 1.43 and 3.50 microg/dl respectively. At cut-off levels of 30 mg/dl for plasma Lp(a) and 10 microg/dl of urinary apo(a) respectively, both paramenters showed comparable sensitivities (33.8% vs. 26.7%), yet the specificity (76.1% vs. 91.7%) and the positive predictive value (60.0% vs.76.4%) of urinary apo(a) were much higher. In receiver-operating characteristic plots, urinary apo(a) was much more sensitive at high specificities i.e. greater than 60% as compared to Lp(a). Urinary secretion of apo(a) fragments normalized to creatinine is stable in a given individual and significantly associated with coronary artery disease.

LDL-apheresis significantly reduces urinary apo(a) excretion.

Increased plasma Lp(a) is an established risk factor for atherosclerosis. We recently described the presence of apo(a) fragments in urine and the significant correlation between urinary apo(a) concentrations and plasma Lp(a). Here we investigated urinary apo(a) in patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), treated with LDL apheresis. Before treatment, plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) normalized to creatinine were > 2-fold increased in FH patients (P < 0.0001) as compared to controls. LDL-apheresis led to a reduction of plasma Lp(a) by 75% and a concomitant immediate reduction of urinary apo(a) by 45%. We conclude that a steady state condition for urinary apo(a) is rapidly achieved via LDL-apheresis.

Apolipoprotein(a) is present in urine and its excretion is decreased in patients with renal failure.

To investigate the relation between renal function and concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in serum, we measured Lp(a) in samples of serum and urine from patients with diabetes mellitus and in samples sent to a laboratory center for measurements of creatinine clearance. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were significantly increased in subjects with obvious renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > or = 176.8 mumol/L) compared with normal control subjects. Urinary Lp(a) excretion was decreased in subjects with obvious renal dysfunction compared with subjects without obvious renal dysfunction (serum creatinine < or = 88.4 mumol/L) and was negatively and positively correlated with serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, respectively. More than 80% of urinary Lp(a) was recovered in the d > 1.21 kg/L fraction. At least six bands for apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] fragments, which were smaller than native apo(a) in serum, were observed in urine by immunoblotting, and some of these were also detected in serum. Degraded apo(a) fragments are probably present in urine, and their excretion decreases in parallel with decreases in the glomerular filtration rate.