Successful Prediction of Human Steady-State Unbound Brain-to-Plasma Concentration Ratio of P-gp Substrates Using the Proteomics-Informed Relative Expression Factor Approach.

In order to optimize central nervous system (CNS) drug development, accurate prediction of the drug's human steady-state unbound brain interstitial fluid-to-plasma concentration ratio (Kp,uu,brain ) is critical, especially for drugs that are effluxed by the multiple drug resistance transporters (e.g., P-glycoprotein, P-gp). Due to lack of good in vitro human blood-brain barrier models, we and others have advocated the use of a proteomics-informed relative expressive factor (REF) approach to predict Kp,uu,brain . Therefore, we tested the success of this approach in humans, with a focus on P-gp substrates, using brain positron emission tomography imaging data for verification. To do so, the efflux ratio (ER) of verapamil, N-desmethyl loperamide, and metoclopramide was determined in human P-gp-transfected MDCKII cells using the Transwell assay. Then, using the ER estimate, Kp,uu,brain of the drug was predicted using REF (ER approach). Alternatively, in vitro passive and P-gp-mediated intrinsic clearances (CLs) of these drugs, estimated using a five-compartmental model, were extrapolated to in vivo using REF (active CL) and brain microvascular endothelial cells protein content (passive CL). The ER approach successfully predicted Kp,uu,brain of all three drugs within twofold of observed data and within 95% confidence interval of the observed data for verapamil and N-desmethyl loperamide. Using the in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolated clearance approach, Kp,uu,brain was reasonably well predicted but not the brain unbound interstitial fluid drug concentration-time profile. Therefore, we propose that the ER approach be used to predict Kp,uu,brain of CNS candidate drugs to enhance their success in development.

Loperamide Abuse and Its Sequelae.

INTRODUCTION: Loperamide is an opioid available over the counter and in prescription form. Loperamide functions as a µ-agonist within the enteric nervous system to slow intestinal motility. Its antidiarrheal properties and primarily peripheral activity make loperamide an important tool in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man was found unconscious in cardiac arrest, and emergency medical personnel restored normal sinus rhythm. Family reported complaints of abdominal pain and that he "went through a lot" of loperamide. In the emergency department, the patient exhibited symptoms consistent with an opioid overdose. Mental status improved after administration of naloxone, an opioid antagonist. An electrocardiogram revealed a prolonged QTc interval, which progressed into Torsades de Pointes rhythm during admission. The patient succumbed from hypoxic brain injury, and there was evidence of acute pancreatitis at autopsy. Loperamide and desmethylloperamide (loperamide metabolite) were detected in blood samples. Cause of death was ruled loperamide toxicity. DISCUSSION: Because of reduced central nervous system activity and associated euphoria at therapeutic doses, loperamide abuse is rarely reported. This case demonstrates that an overdose on loperamide can occur in patients seeking symptom alleviation, and may mimic the presentation of opioid overdose.

Loperamide induced cardiac arrhythmia successfully supported with veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO), molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Introduction: This case of Loperamide misuse had refractory ventricular arrhythmias and was successfully supported by VA ECMO. Loperamide is currently available without prescription and can be obtained in large quantities over the internet despite Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2016 black box warning noting cardiac toxicity. This case illustrates the life-threatening toxicity of loperamide and suggests a supportive modality to provide clinical time while the drug is cleared endogenously or exogenously. Case report: A 36-year-old female was found minimally responsive. Vital signs and monitoring revealed wide complex bradycardia, undetectable blood pressure, hypothermia, bradypnea, and hypoglycemia. The rhythm degenerated to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia cardia refractory to multiple ACLS protocols. VA-ECMO was initiated with immediate stabilization. Subsequent history revealed massive consumption of loperamide taking 400-600 mg daily. Highest known loperamide and N-desmethyl-loperamide levels were 32 and 500 ng/ml respectively. Since loperamide and metabolites are known to be protein bound, molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) was initiated for toxin clearance. Additionally, she developed acute renal failure supported by CRRT. She was ultimately weaned from ECMO, MARS, and CRRT and discharged neurologically intact on hospital day 12. Discussion: VA ECMO for hemodynamic support provided the needed time for natural resolution of the cardiac toxicity while providing adequate perfusion. MARS was used in the setting of highly protein bound toxins, but drug clearance could not be demonstrated through serial levels. VA ECMO (or referral to a center with VA ECMO) should be considered with lethal loperamide-induced cardiotoxicity and perhaps other cardio-toxins.

Quantification of Loperamide by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry.

Due to reported pharmacological activity similar to classical opioids at supratherapeutic concentrations, abuse of the anti-diarrheal medication loperamide (Imodium AD™) has become a target in the opioid epidemic. While this phenomenon is not new, published quantitative analytical methods use liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Described here is an 11 min method for quantification of loperamide in postmortem whole blood by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Validation studies performed followed SWGTOX guidelines and included: accuracy, specificity, limit of detection (LOD), regression model analysis, stability, and matrix recovery enhancement and/or suppression. The accuracy study consisted of inter-day, intra-day, reproducibility and dilution integrity experiments. Inter-day and intra-day accuracy, precision and coefficient of variation (CV) were measured; normalized results were 1.05 ± 0.09 with 8.87% CV (n = 36) and 1.03 ± 0.09 with 8.53% CV (n = 27), respectively. Reproducibility was evaluated through standard addition with an observed CV of 10.84% (n = 10). Dilution integrity (2× and 4×) resulted in 0.94 ± 0.13 with a CV of 13.9% (n = 5). No interference was observed through analyses of the internal standard (loperamide-d6), endogenous compounds (10 blank matrices) or 60 commonly encountered analytes. The LOD/decision point was 100 ng/mL (CV 8.40%). A linear calibration model was established from 100 to 1,000 ng/mL. Stability was examined; observed analyte-to-internal standard response resulted in 6.59% CV. Recovery was determined for loperamide and loperamide-d6 (31% and 36%, respectively). Neither matrix suppression nor enhancement was observed with loperamide at 750 ng/mL and loperamide-d6 at 300 ng/mL (-6.5% and -4.2%); however, some suppression was exhibited at lower concentrations (-39.8%). The designed method was determined to be sufficient for the analysis of loperamide-related death cases in Alabama (n = 8) and offers postmortem toxicology laboratories an alternative approach that is both highly selective and specific.

Loperamide-Related Deaths in North Carolina.

Loperamide (Imodium®) has been accepted as a safe, effective, over-the-counter anti-diarrheal drug with low potential for abuse. It is a synthetic opioid that lacks central nervous system activity at prescribed doses, rendering it ineffective for abuse. Since 2012, however, the North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has seen cases involving loperamide at supratherapeutic levels that indicate abuse. The recommended dose associated with loperamide should not exceed 16 mg per day, although users seeking an opioid-like high reportedly take it in excess of 100 mg per dose. When taken as directed, the laboratory organic base extraction screening method with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/nitrogen phosphorus detector lacks the sensitivity to detect loperamide. When taken in excess, the screening method identifies loperamide followed by a separate technique to confirm and quantify the drug by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 21 cases involving loperamide, the pathologist implicated the drug as either additive or primary to the cause of death in 19 cases. The mean and median peripheral blood concentrations for the drug overdose cases were 0.27 and 0.23 mg/L, respectively. Furthermore, an extensive review of the pharmacology associated with loperamide and its interaction with P-glycoprotein will be examined as it relates to the mechanism of toxicity.

Not your regular high: cardiac dysrhythmias caused by loperamide.

OBJECTIVE: Loperamide, a non-prescription anti-diarrheal agent, is a peripheral mu-opioid receptor agonist that is excluded from the blood-brain barrier by p-glycoprotein at therapeutic doses. Overdoses of loperamide penetrate the central nervous system (CNS), leading to abuse. We report cardiac conduction abnormalities and dysrhythmias after ingestion of a recreational supra-therapeutic dose of loperamide confirmed with an elevated blood loperamide concentration. CASE DETAILS: A 48-year-old woman with a history of alcohol and benzodiazepine abuse presented to the emergency department (ED) with somnolence, weakness and slurred speech. She was taking 20 to 40 tablets of 2 mg loperamide 1-2 times/day for weeks along with clonazepam and whiskey. Vital signs were: blood pressure (BP), 124/90 mmHg; heart rate (HR), 88/min; respiratory rate(RR), 20/min; T, 36.9 °C; O2 saturation 100% on room air (RA). Glucose was 6.4 mmol/L. Electrocardiogram (ECG) had a ventricular rate of 58/min, QRS 164 ms, QT 582 ms with no discernable p-waves. Lactate was 3.5 mmol/L and potassium was 6.2 mEq/L. Labs were notable for an anion gap of 20 mEq/L, ethanol of 3.9 mmol/L, creatinine of 2.3 mg/dL and loperamide concentration of 210 ng/mL (average therapeutic plasma concentration 1.2 ng/mL). She became hypotensive, but responded to fluids. Following treatment for hyperkalemia with calcium, insulin, dextrose, and hypertonic sodium bicarbonate a repeat ECG had a ventricular rate of 66/min, QRS 156 ms, and QT 576 ms. Magnesium was given and pacer pads were placed. During the infusion of magnesium, her BP fell to 92/58 mmHg with a HR of 54/min, RR 14/min, O2 saturation of 97% on RA so the infusion was stopped. The ECG after the magnesium infusion had a ventricular rate of 51/min, QRS of 134 ms, and QT 614 ms. In the ICU she had multiple runs of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia that did not require therapy. Over the next 48 h she improved and was transferred to a floor bed. On day four of hospitalization the patient left against medical advice. At that time, her ECG showed sinus tachycardia with a heart rate 114/min, QRS 82 ms, QT 334 ms. DISCUSSION: Loperamide produces both QRS and QT prolongation at supra-therapeutic dosing. A blood loperamide concentration of 210 ng/mL is among the highest concentrations reported. Supra-therapeutic dosing of loperamide is promoted on multiple drug-use websites and online forums as a treatment for opioid withdrawal, as well as for euphoric effects. With the current epidemic of prescription opioid abuse, toxicity related to loperamide, an opioid agonist that is readily available without a prescription is occurring more frequently. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the potentially life-threatening toxicity related to loperamide abuse in order to provide proper diagnosis, management and patient education.

Poor Man's Methadone: A Case Report of Loperamide Toxicity.

Loperamide, a common over-the-counter antidiarrheal drug and opioid derivative, is formulated to act upon intestinal opioid receptors. However, at high doses, loperamide crosses the blood-brain barrier and reaches central opioid receptors in the brain, leading to central opiate effects including euphoria and respiratory depression. We report the case of a young man found dead in his residence with a known history of drug abuse. At autopsy, the only significant findings were a distended bladder and bloody oral purge. Drug screening found nontoxic levels of alprazolam, fluoxetine, and marijuana metabolites. Liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry found an unusual set of split isotope peaks consistent with chlorine. On the basis of autopsy and toxicological findings, loperamide toxicity was suspected because of its opioid properties and molecular formula containing chlorine. A sample of loperamide was analyzed by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry, resulting in a matching mass and retention time to the decedent's sample. Subsequently, quantitative testing detected 63 ng/mL of loperamide or more than 6 times of therapeutic peak concentration. Cause of death was determined as "toxic effects of loperamide with fluoxetine and alprazolam." Because of its opioid effects and easy accessibility, loperamide is known as "poor man's methadone" and may go undetected at medical and forensic drug screening.

Determination of loperamide in human plasma and saliva by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A simple and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for quantification of loperamide in human plasma and saliva was developed and validated, and then successfully applied in pharmacokinetic clinical study to investigate and correlate bioavailability of Imodium(®) 2mg quartet tablet dose in both human plasma and saliva. Loperamide with labeled internal standard was extracted from its biological matrix by methanol as protein direct precipitant in single extraction step. Adequate chromatographic separation for analytes from plasma and saliva matrices was achieved using ACE C18 (50mm×2.1mm, 5µm) column, eluted by water/methanol/formic acid (30:70:0.1%, v/v), delivered isocratically at constant flow rate of 0.75ml/min. The method validation intends to investigate specificity, sensitivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect and stability according to European guideline, and partial validation was applied on saliva, specificity, matrix effect, recovery, sensitivity, within and between day precision and accuracy. The calibration curve was linear through the range of 20-3000pg/ml in both plasma and saliva using a 50µl sample volume. The partial validation sections outcome in saliva was so close to those in plasma. The within- and between-day precisions were all below 8.7% for plasma and below 11.4% for saliva. Accuracies ranged from 94 to 105% for both matrices. In this study, 26 healthy volunteers participated in the clinical study, and 6 of gave their saliva samples in addition to plasma at the same time schedule. The pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, Tmax and T1/2 in both plasma and saliva were calculated and correlated.

Assessment of a candidate marker constituent predictive of a dietary substance-drug interaction: case study with grapefruit juice and CYP3A4 drug substrates.

Dietary substances, including herbal products and citrus juices, can perpetrate interactions with conventional medications. Regulatory guidances for dietary substance-drug interaction assessment are lacking. This deficiency is due in part to challenges unique to dietary substances, a lack of requisite human-derived data, and limited jurisdiction. An in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approach to help address some of these hurdles was evaluated using the exemplar dietary substance grapefruit juice (GFJ), the candidate marker constituent 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin (DHB), and the purported victim drug loperamide. First, the GFJ-loperamide interaction was assessed in 16 healthy volunteers. Loperamide (16 mg) was administered with 240 ml of water or GFJ; plasma was collected from 0 to 72 hours. Relative to water, GFJ increased the geometric mean loperamide area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) significantly (1.7-fold). Second, the mechanism-based inhibition kinetics for DHB were recovered using human intestinal microsomes and the index CYP3A4 reaction, loperamide N-desmethylation (KI [concentration needed to achieve one-half kinact], 5.0 ± 0.9 µM; kinact [maximum inactivation rate constant], 0.38 ± 0.02 minute(-1)). These parameters were incorporated into a mechanistic static model, which predicted a 1.6-fold increase in loperamide AUC. Third, the successful IVIVE prompted further application to 15 previously reported GFJ-drug interaction studies selected according to predefined criteria. Twelve of the interactions were predicted to within the 25% predefined criterion. Results suggest that DHB could be used to predict the CYP3A4-mediated effect of GFJ. This time- and cost-effective IVIVE approach could be applied to other dietary substance-drug interactions to help prioritize new and existing drugs for more advanced (dynamic) modeling and simulation and clinical assessment.

Coadministration of P-glycoprotein modulators on loperamide pharmacokinetics and brain distribution.

The efflux transporter P-glycoprotein, expressed at high levels at the blood-brain barrier, exerts a profound effect on the disposition of various therapeutic compounds in the brain. A rapid and efficient modulation of this efflux transporter could enhance the distribution of its substrates and thereby improve central nervous system pharmacotherapies. This study explored the impact of the intravenous coadministration of two P-glycoprotein modulators, tariquidar and elacridar, on the pharmacokinetics and brain distribution of loperamide, a P-glycoprotein substrate probe, in rats. After 1 hour postdosing, tariquidar and elacridar, both at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg, increased loperamide levels in the brain by 2.3- and 3.5-fold, respectively. However, the concurrent administration of both P-glycoprotein modulators, each at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, increased loperamide levels in the brain by 5.8-fold and resulted in the most pronounced opioid-induced clinical signs. This phenomenon may be the result of a combined noncompetitive modulation by tariquidar and elacridar. Besides, the simultaneous administration of elacridar and tariquidar did not significantly modify the pharmacokinetic parameters of loperamide. This observation potentially allows the concurrent use of low but therapeutic doses of P-gp modulators to achieve full inhibitory effects.

P-glycoprotein increases portal bioavailability of loperamide in mouse by reducing first-pass intestinal metabolism.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A (cytochrome P450 3A, generally; Cyp3a, rodent enzyme) in the intestine can attenuate absorption of orally administered drugs. While some suggest that P-gp enhances intestinal metabolism by CYP3A/Cyp3a during absorption of a dual substrate, others suggest that P-gp reduces the metabolism in the intestine when substrates are at subsaturating concentrations. Hence, to elucidate the cellular mechanisms that can address these divergent reports, we studied intestinal absorption of the dual substrate loperamide in portal vein-cannulated P-gp-competent and P-gp-deficient mice. These studies showed that at low doses of loperamide, which produced intestinal concentrations near the apparent K(m) for oxidative metabolism, the bioavailability across the intestine (F(G)) was 6-fold greater in the P-gp-competent mice than in P-gp-deficient mice. The higher F(G) of loperamide in the presence of P-gp was attributed to lower loperamide intestinal metabolism. However, at high doses of loperamide, the sparing of first-pass metabolism by P-gp was balanced against the attenuation of absorption by apical efflux, resulting in no net effect on F(G). In vitro studies with intestinal tissue from P-gp-competent and -deficient mice confirmed that P-gp reduced the metabolic rate of loperamide during absorptive flux at concentrations near K(m) but had little effect on metabolism at higher (saturating) concentrations. Further, studies in which Cyp3a was chemically inactivated by aminobenzotriazole in P-gp-competent and -deficient mice, showed that P-gp and Cyp3a individually attenuated F(G) by 8-fold and 70-fold, respectively. These results confirmed that P-gp effectively protects loperamide at low doses from intestinal first-pass metabolism during intestinal absorption.

Characterization of SAGE Mdr1a (P-gp), Bcrp, and Mrp2 knockout rats using loperamide, paclitaxel, sulfasalazine, and carboxydichlorofluorescein pharmacokinetics.

Transporter gene knockout rats are practically advantageous over murine models for pharmacokinetic and excretion studies, but their phenotypic characterization is lacking. At present, relevant aspects of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, distribution, and excretion of transporter probes [P-glycoprotein (P-gp): loperamide and paclitaxel; breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp): sulfasalazine; and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2): carboxydichlorofluorescein] were studied systematically across SAGE P-gp, Bcrp, and Mrp2 knockout rats. In Mdr1a knockout rats, loperamide and paclitaxel oral bioavailability was 2- and 4-fold increased, respectively, whereas clearance was significantly reduced (40-42%), consistent with the expected 10- to 20-fold reduction in paclitaxel excretion. N-Desmethyl-loperamide pharmacokinetics were not altered in any of the three knockouts after oral loperamide. In rats lacking P-gp, paclitaxel brain partitioning was significantly increased (4-fold). This finding is consistent with observations of loperamide central nervous system opioid pharmacology in Mdr1a knockout rats. Sulfasalazine oral bioavailability was markedly increased 21-fold in Bcrp knockouts and, as expected, was also 2- to 3-fold higher in P-gp and Mrp2 knockout rats. The sulfapyridine metabolite/parent ratio was decreased 10-fold in rats lacking Bcrp after oral, but not intravenous, sulfasalazine administration. Carboxydichlorofluorescein biliary excretion was obliterated in Mrp2 knockout rats, resulting in 25% decreased systemic clearance and 35% increased half-life. In contrast, carboxydichlorofluorescein renal clearance was not impaired in the absence of Mrp2, Bcrp, or P-gp. In conclusion, SAGE Mdr1a, Bcrp, and Mrp2 knockout rats generally demonstrated the expected phenotypes with respect to alterations in pharmacokinetics of relevant probe substrates; therefore, these knockout rats can be used as an alternative to murine models whenever a larger species is practically advantageous or more relevant to the drug discovery/development program.

The influence of mass of [11C]-laniquidar and [11C]-N-desmethyl-loperamide on P-glycoprotein blockage at the blood-brain barrier.

INTRODUCTION: An earlier report suggested that mass amount of PET tracers could be an important factor in brain uptake mediated by P-glycoprotein. Thereby, this study investigated the influence of mass dose of laniquidar, desmethyl-loperamide and loperamide on the P-glycoprotein-mediated brain uptake of, respectively, [(11)C]-laniquidar and [(11)C]-N-desmethyl-loperamide ([(11)C]-dLop). METHODS: Wild-type (WT) mice were injected intravenously with solutions of 5.6 MBq [(11)C]-laniquidar (either no carrier added or 60 mg/kg laniquidar added) or with 5.0-7.4 MBq [(11)C]-dLop (either no carrier added or 3 mg/kg desmethyl loperamide). Mice were killed, and brain and blood were collected, weighted and counted for radioactivity. Mdr1a(-/-) knockout mice were incorporated as the control group. RESULTS: Injection of (11)C-laniquidar (no carrier added) in WT mice resulted in a statistical significant lower brain uptake (0.7±0.2 %ID/g) compared to the carrier-added formulation (60 mg/kg laniquidar) (3.1±0.3 %ID/g) (P=.004), while no statistical difference could be observed between formulations of [(11)C]-dLop. The [(11)C]-laniquidar and [(11)C]-dLop blood concentrations were not significantly different between the tested formulations in WT mice. In control animals, no effect of mass amount on brain uptake of both tracers could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the bivalent character of laniquidar, acting as a substrate at low doses and as a blocking agent for P-glycoprotein transport in the brain at higher doses. In comparison, no difference was observed in [(11)C]-dLop uptake between carrier- and no-carrier-added formulations, which confirms that desmethyl-loperamide is a substrate of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier.

Antiepileptic drugs modulate P-glycoproteins in the brain: a mice study with (11)C-desmethylloperamide.

P-glycoprotein transporters (P-gp) located at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are likely to play a role in refractory epilepsy. In vitro studies already pointed out that several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are substrate of P-gp. This study proposes a new in vivo approach to investigate the interaction between some AEDs and P-gp located at the BBB. (11)C-desmethylloperamide ((11)C-dLop), a radiolabelled substrate of P-gp, was intravenously administrated after pretreatment with saline or AEDs (sodium valproate, levetiracetam, topiramate and phenytoin) at their human therapeutic and four times their therapeutic dose. The effect of the different pretreatment on the intracerebral concentration of (11)C-dLop was determined to indirectly investigate possible in vivo interactions between AEDs and P-gp. Pretreatment with levetiracetam, topiramate and phenytoin at therapeutic doses significantly decreased intracerebral concentration of (11)C-dLop. Pretreatment with a therapeutic dose of sodium valproate did not influence brain uptake of (11)C-dLop. In case of pretreatment with supratherapeutic doses of AED, (11)C-dLop brain uptake was not different compared to pretreatment with saline. The metabolisation rate of (11)C-dLop in plasma was unaltered, indicating that observed differences in brain uptake of the tracer were not due to pharmacokinetic changes. The following conclusion can be made: levetiracetam, topiramate and phenytoin demonstrate biphasic modulation of the BBB P-gp. At therapeutic doses they act as inducers of efflux, at supratherapeutic doses they have no effect on the efflux rate. Sodium valproate does not interact with P-gp at therapeutic nor at higher doses.

Competitive substrates for P-glycoprotein and organic anion protein transporters differentially reduce blood organ transport of fentanyl and loperamide: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Sprague-Dawley rats.

BACKGROUND: Drug transport proteins may be instrumental in controlling the concentration of fentanyl at mu receptors in the brain and may provide potential therapeutic targets for controlling an individual response to opioid administration. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporter and organic anion transport protein inward transporters (OATP, human; Oatp, rat) have been implicated in fentanyl and verapamil (only P-gp) transport across the blood-brain barrier. We hypothesized that transport proteins P-gp and Oatp mediate opioid uptake in a drug and organ-specific manner, making them excellent potential targets for therapeutic intervention. METHODS: Opioid (fentanyl or loperamide) was administered by IV infusion to Sprague-Dawley rats alone or in combination with competitive substrates of P-gp (verapamil) or Oatp (pravastatin, naloxone). Plasma, lung, and brain were collected over 10 min and at 60 min after opioid infusion and opioid concentration determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS). Continuous electroencephalogram was used to determine the in vivo response to fentanyl and loperamide in the presence and absence of verapamil. RESULTS: Loperamide brain:plasma (P(B)) and lung:plasma (P(L)) partitioning was increased two and fivefold, respectively in the presence of verapamil. Verapamil administration was lethal unless the loperamide dose was reduced by half (0.95-0.475 mg/kg). Fentanyl brain:plasma and lung:plasma were reduced four and sixfold, respectively, by pravastatin and naloxone, whereas verapamil had much less effect. Electroencephalogram results indicated that verapamil reduced the fentanyl-induced central nervous system (CNS) effect and increased the loperamide CNS effect. CONCLUSION: Protein transporters appear to be organ and drug-specific in vivo, affecting first-pass pulmonary uptake and CNS response to opioid administration. Further, data suggest that transport protein inhibition may prove useful for normalizing an individual response to opioids.

Tariquidar, a selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor, does not potentiate loperamide's opioid brain effects in humans despite full inhibition of lymphocyte P-glycoprotein.

BACKGROUND: Loperamide, a potent opioid, has been used as an in vivo probe to assess P-glycoprotein activity at the blood-brain barrier, because P-glycoprotein inhibition allows loperamide to cross the blood-brain barrier and exert its central opioid effects. In humans, studies with nonselective and moderately potent inhibitors resulted in mild opioid effects but were confounded by the concurrent inhibition of loperamide's metabolism. The authors studied the effect of the highly selective, potent P-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar on loperamide's central opioid effects. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, nine healthy subjects received on 2 study days oral loperamide (32 mg) followed by an intravenous infusion of either tariquidar (150 mg) or placebo. Central opioid effects (pupil diameter, sedation) were measured for 12 h, and blood samples were drawn up to 48 h after drug administration to determine plasma loperamide concentrations and ex vivo P-glycoprotein activity in T lymphocytes. Values for pupil diameter and loperamide concentrations were plotted over time, and the areas under the curves on the tariquidar and placebo study day were compared within each subject. RESULTS: Tariquidar did not significantly affect loperamide's central effects (median reduction in pupil diameter area under the curve, 6.9% [interquartile range, -1.4 to 12.1%]; P = 0.11) or plasma loperamide concentrations (P = 0.12) but profoundly inhibited P-glycoprotein in lymphocytes by 93.7% (95% confidence interval, 92.0-95.3%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that despite full inhibition of lymphocyte P-glycoprotein, the selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar does not potentiate loperamide's opioid brain effects in humans.

Modest effect of impaired P-glycoprotein on the plasma concentrations of fexofenadine, quinidine, and loperamide following oral administration in collies.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by the multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1/ABCB1), exhibits very broad substrate specificity and plays important roles in drug disposition. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of impaired P-gp activity on the plasma pharmacokinetics of P-gp substrates in collies with or without homozygous mutant alleles producing truncated P-gp. Three therapeutic agents, fexofenadine (0.1 mg/kg), quinidine (0.1 mg/kg), and loperamide (0.01 mg/kg), were simultaneously given orally, and their plasma concentration-time profiles were determined. The plasma concentrations of these drugs tended to be higher in dogs with the homozygous mutated allele. The C(max) was 53.9 +/- 13.1 and 90.7 +/- 23.1 ng/ml for fexofenadine, 16.5 +/- 3.4 and 20.0 +/- 7.9 ng/ml for quinidine, and 80.8 +/- 9.0 and 101 +/- 15 pg/ml for loperamide, and the AUC(0-8) was 263 +/- 62 and 435 +/- 95 ng x h/ml for fexofenadine, 54.5 +/- 11.5 and 75.7 +/- 21.8 ng x h/ml for quinidine, and 467 +/- 85 and 556 +/- 91 pg x h/ml for loperamide in homozygous wild-type and homozygous mutated dogs, respectively. Only the plasma concentration differences of fexofenadine at 4 to 8 h after oral administration were statistically significant. This result suggests that P-gp limits the intestinal absorption of fexofenadine in dogs. Collies with the Mdr1 mutation will be useful for examining the effect of P-gp on the oral availability of drugs.

Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide.

OBJECTIVE: Loperamide is biotransformed in vitro by the cytochromes P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 3A4 and is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein efflux transporter. Our aim was to investigate the effects of itraconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and gemfibrozil, an inhibitor of CYP2C8, on the pharmacokinetics of loperamide. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study with 4 phases, 12 healthy volunteers took 100 mg itraconazole (first dose 200 mg), 600 mg gemfibrozil, both itraconazole and gemfibrozil, or placebo, twice daily for 5 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 4-mg dose of loperamide. Loperamide and N-desmethylloperamide concentrations in plasma were measured for up to 72 h and in urine for up to 48 h. Possible central nervous system effects of loperamide were assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and by subjective drowsiness. RESULTS: Itraconazole raised the peak plasma loperamide concentration (Cmax) 2.9-fold (range, 1.2-5.0; P < 0.001) and the total area under the plasma loperamide concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) 3.8-fold (1.4-6.6; P < 0.001) and prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of loperamide from 11.9 to 18.7 h (P < 0.001). Gemfibrozil raised the Cmax of loperamide 1.6-fold (0.9-3.2; P < 0.05) and its AUC(0-infinity) 2.2-fold (1.0-3.7; P < 0.05) and prolonged its t(1/2) to 16.7 h (P < 0.01). The combination of itraconazole and gemfibrozil raised the Cmax of loperamide 4.2-fold (1.5-8.7; P < 0.001) and its AUC(0-infinity) 12.6-fold (4.3-21.8; P < 0.001) and prolonged the t(1/2) of loperamide to 36.9 h (P < 0.001). The amount of loperamide excreted into urine within 48 h was increased 3.0-fold, 1.4-fold and 5.3-fold by itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination, respectively (P < 0.05). Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination reduced the plasma AUC(0-72) ratio of N-desmethylloperamide to loperamide by 65%, 46% and 88%, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test or subjective drowsiness between the phases. CONCLUSION: Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide. Although not seen in the psychomotor tests used, an increased risk of adverse effects should be considered during concomitant use of loperamide with itraconazole, gemfibrozil and especially their combination.