Clinical efficacy and imaging analysis of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of different types of lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis.

PURPOSE: To analyze and study the clinical efficacy and imaging indexes of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis(LFS) caused by different causes. METHOD: 33 patients with LFS treated with OLIF from January 2018 to May 2022 were reviewed. Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were calculated before and after operation. Segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) and segmental scoliosis angle (SSA), disc height (DH), posterior disc height (PDH), lateral disc height (LDH), foraminal height (FH), foramen width (FW) and foraminal cross-sectional area (FSCA) were measured before and after operation. RESULT: The VAS and ODI after operation were significantly improved as compared with those before operation. Compared with pre-operation, the DH, PHD increased by 67.6%, 94.6%, LDH increased by 107.4% (left), 101.7% (right), and FH increased by 30.2% (left), 34.5% (right). The FSCA increased by 93.1% (left), 89.0% (right), and the FW increased by 137.0% (left), 149.6% (right). The postoperative SSA was corrected by 74.5%, the postoperative SLA, LLA were corrected by 70.2%, 38.1%, respectively. All the imaging indexes were significantly improved (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and imaging data of OLIF in the treatment of LFS caused by low and moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis, intervertebral disc bulge and reduced intervertebral space height, degenerative lumbar scoliosis, articular process hyperplasia or dislocation have been well improved. OLIF may be one of the better surgical treatments for LFS caused by the above conditions.

Mid-Term Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests that sagittal imbalance is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease following fusion surgery. This study explored the influence of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch on the mid-term results and reoperation rate after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS: The participants of this study included 253 patients (80 men and 173 women; mean age 68.2 years) who underwent L4-5 single-segment PLIF. Preoperative PI-LL mismatch was defined as a PI-LL of 30° or greater. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL mismatch group; group M, Control group; group C), and the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters were compared. RESULTS: Of the 253 cases, 25 were classified in group M and 228 in group C. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 5 years postoperatively was 23.0 ± 3.6 in group M and 23.5 ± 5.1 in group C, and the recovery rate was 66.2 ± 32.6% in group M and 64.6 ± 21.4% in group C and there was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the 2 groups. All radiographic parameters except sacral slope were significantly worse in group M. One patient (4.3%) in Group M and 18 patients (7.8%) in Group C required revision surgery at 2.4 years (range 0.0-5.0) and there was no significant difference in the revision rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term results of L4-5 single-level PLIF were compared with and without PI-LL mismatch, with the threshold defined as 30°; however, there were no significant differences in both the Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery and reoperation rates between the 2 groups.

Validation of Roussouly classification in predicting the occurrence of adjacent segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that restoring sagittal alignment to the original Roussouly type can remarkably reduce complication rates after adult spinal deformity surgery. However, there is still no data proving the benefit of maintaining ideal Roussouly shape in the lumbar degenerative diseases and its association with the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Thus, this study was performed to validate the usefulness of Roussouly classification to predict the occurrence of ASD after lumbar fusion surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. The patients were classified by both "theoretical" [based on pelvic incidence (PI)] and "current" (based on sacral slope) Roussouly types. The patients were defined as "matched" if their "current" shapes matched the "theoretical" types and otherwise as "mismatched". The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with ASD. Finally, clinical data and spinopelvic parameters of "theoretical" and "current" types were compared. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months, evidence of ASD was found in the 68 cases. Postoperatively, ASD group had more "current" shapes classified as type 1 or 2 and fewer as type 3 than the non-ASD group (p < 0.001), but the distribution of "theoretical" types was similar between groups. Moreover, 80.9% (55/68) of patients with ASD were mismatched, while 48.2% (80/166) of patients without ASD were mismatched (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.058)], 2-level fusion (OR = 2.9830), postoperative distal lordosis (DL, OR = 0.949) and mismatched Roussouly type (OR = 4.629) as independent risk factors of ASD. Among the four "theoretical" types, type 2 had the lowest lumbar lordosis, DL, and segmental lordosis. When considering the "current" types, current type 2 was associated with higher rates of 2-level fusion, worse DL, and greater pelvic tilt compared with other current types. CONCLUSIONS: DL loss and mismatched Roussouly type were significant risk factors of ASD. To decrease the incidence of ASD, an appropriate value of DL should be achieved to restore sagittal alignment back to the ideal Roussouly type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Risk factors of instrumentation failure after laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF).

BACKGROUND: For patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy, laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF) with instrumentation are widely accepted techniques for symptom relief. However, hardware failure is not rare and results in neck pain or even permanent neurological lesions. There are no in-depth studies of hardware-related complications following laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective, single centre, observational study. Patients who underwent laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation in a single institution between January 2019 and January 2021 were included. Patients were divided into hardware failure and no hardware failure group according to whether there was a hardware failure. Data, including sex, age, screw density, end vertebra (C7 or T1), cervical sagittal alignment parameters (C2-C7 cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, Cervical lordosis correction), regional Hounsfield units (HU) of the screw trajectory and osteoporosis status, were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We analysed the clinical data of 56 patients in total. The mean overall follow-up duration was 20.6 months (range, 12-30 months). Patients were divided into the hardware failure group (n = 14) and no hardware failure group (n = 42). There were no significant differences in the general information (age, sex, follow-up period) of patients between the two groups. The differences in fusion rate, fixation levels, and screw density between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The failure rate of fixation ending at T1 was lower than that at C7 (9% vs. 36.3%) (p = 0.019). The regional HU values of the pedicle screw (PS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) in the failure group were lower than those in the no failure group (PS: 267 ± 45 vs. 368 ± 43, p = 0.001; LMS: 308 ± 53 vs. 412 ± 41, p = 0.001). The sagittal alignment parameters did not show significant differences between the two groups before surgery or at the final follow-up (p > 0.05). The hardware failure rate in patients without osteoporosis was lower than that in patients with osteoporosis (14.3% vs. 57.1%) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis, fixation ending at C7, and low regional HU value of the screw trajectory were the independent risk factors of hardware failure after laminectomy and PCF. Future studies should illuminate if preventive measures targeting these factors can help reduce hardware failure and identified more risk factors, and perform long-term follow-up.

Fusion with and without lever reduction in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The reduction of slipped vertebra is often performed during surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). This approach, while potentially improving clinical and radiological outcomes, also carries a risk of increased complications due to the reduction process. To address this, we introduced an innovative lever reduction technique for DLS treatment. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy, radiological outcomes, and complications of fusion with or without lever reduction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a registry of patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for DLS, with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Self-reported measures included visual analog scale (VAS) for back or leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Radiological assessments encompassed spondylolisthesis percentage (SP), focal lordosis (FL), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Complications were categorized using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) scheme. Patients were assigned to the reduction group (RG) and non-reduction group (NRG) based on the application of the lever reduction technique. Clinical and radiological outcomes at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at the last follow-up were compared. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were analyzed (123 NRG, 158 RG). Baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were similarly distributed between groups except for operating time (NRG 129.25 min, RG 138.04 min, P = .009). Both groups exhibited significant clinical improvement after surgery (all, P = .000), with no substantial difference between groups (VAS, ODI, or the ability to reach MCID). Patients in RG showed statistically lower SP and higher FL during follow-up (all, P = .000). LL was comparable at different time points within each group or at the same time point between the two groups (all, P > .050). The overall complication rate (NRG 38.2%, RG 27.2%, P = .050) or specific complication rates per MCDC were similar between groups (all, P > .050). Patients in RG were predisposed to a lower risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) (NRG 9.8%, RG 6.3%, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in postoperative measures such as VAS scores for back and leg pain, ODI, the ability to reach MCID, overall complication rate, or specific complication rates per MCDC between surgical approaches. However, fusion with lever reduction demonstrated a notable advantage in restoring segmental spinal sagittal alignment and reducing the occurrence of ASDeg compared to in situ fusion.

Defining the Post-Operative Progression of Degenerative Scoliosis: An Analysis of Cases without Instrument Failure.

OBJECTIVE: The expected post-operative changes in radiographic alignment over time remain poorly defined in patients surgically treated for degenerative scoliosis without instrument failure. Here we aim to describe the optimal natural progression of radiographic degenerative scoliosis at multiple timepoints in patients treated with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: We identified an initial retrospective cohort of 114 patients treated with a TLIF for degenerative scoliosis between 2018 and 2022, with 39 patients ultimately meeting the imaging inclusion criteria. Patients who completed a primary or revision procedure with no evidence of instrument failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, or proximal junctional failure at last follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements of spinopelvic alignment were manually extracted from X-Ray scoliosis films. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (mean age 62.6 ± 8.7, mean follow-up 2.9 years), of which 23 underwent a primary TLIF (Primary) and 16 a revision procedure (Revision), were analyzed. Patients in the Primary group experienced a durable improvement in Thoracolumbar Cobb angle (-25° ± 15°), Thoracic Kyphosis (10° ± 13°), and Pelvic Incidence/lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL) (-19° ± 19°) through the first year of follow-up. In the Revision group, at one year follow-up, all measures of spinopelvic alignment except PI/LL mismatch had reverted to pre-operative levels. Thoracolumbar Cobb angle decreased to a significantly greater degree in the Primary group compared to the Revision group. CONCLUSION: Primary TLIF operations without instrument failure consistently improve radiographic outcomes in three key measures through the first year. For revision procedures, there appears to be modest radiographic benefit at follow-up.

Pelvic Incidence as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Anterior Column Realignment with Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release to Restore Lordosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables that may contribute to the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with long lumbo-sacral and thoraco-lumbo-pelvic constructs undergoing anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament release (ALLR). METHODS: Data of patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent ACR with ALLR at L3-4 were collected retrospectively from medical records and a prospectively maintained spine research database between 2016 and 2022. RESULTS: Eleven (41%) developed PJF at a mean of 24 ± 21 months from the index surgery. The cohort was then divided into 2 groups for analysis, 13 subjects in the high pelvic incidence (PI) group (defined as PI ≥ 55°) and 14 subjects in the low PI group (defined as PI < 55°). Visual Analog Scale for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 9.5 to 2.1 and 61 to 10 in the high PI group, and from 8.9 to 2.4 and 60.9 to 10.3 in the low PI group, respectively. PI (P = 0.004), sacral slope (P = 0.005), and postoperative PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of PJF. The receiver operator curve revealed a cutoff PI value ≤ 53° (95% confidence interval: 52°-64°), below which the risk of PJF becomes significantly higher in patients undergoing ACR with ALLR at L3-4. CONCLUSIONS: PI may be a predictor of PJF and highly correlates with ACR-ALLR levels. In patients undergoing L3-4 ACR-ALLR, a PI value of ≤53° is associated with a significantly elevated risk of PJF. Preoperative planning of ACR-ALLR level based on normal sagittal alignment in otherwise healthy individuals may mitigate the risk of PJF development in patients with adult spinal deformity treated with ACR-ALLR.

Lumbar lordosis restoration by minimally invasive short-segment fusion with anterior column realignment for adult spinal deformity: minimum 2-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of anterior column realignment (ACR) remains relatively unclear, possibly because some safety concerns have limited its adoption and extensive evaluation. The authors aimed to study whether a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) triad consisting of ACR, lateral lumbar interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in a select group of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients helps shorten fusion length without compromising clinical and radiographic outcomes over a minimum 2-year follow-up period. METHODS: A series of 61 ASD patients (mean age 72.8 years) with pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) (PI-LL) mismatch > 10° underwent the short-segment MIS triad (mean fusion length 3.0 levels) as a single-stage operation with a mean operative time and estimated blood loss of 157 minutes and 127 mL, respectively. Exclusion criteria were 1) thoracic scoliosis as the main deformity, 2) thoracolumbar junction kyphosis > 25°, 3) ankylosed facet joints, and 4) previous spinal fusion surgery. Seven patients, who needed fusion to be extended to S1, underwent mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1. RESULTS: The segmental disc angle at the ACR level more than quintupled, averaging from 2.9° preoperatively to 18.9° at the latest follow-up (p < 0.0001). LL, in turn, nearly doubled from 17.0° to 32.8° (p < 0.0001) and PI-LL decreased by nearly half from 28.8° to 13.2° (p < 0.0001). At the same time, other spinopelvic deformity parameters as well as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly improved. Patients were divided into two groups at the latest postoperative evaluation: 36 patients whose PI-LL improved to < 10° and 25 patients who maintained a PI-LL mismatch > 10°. Binary logistic regression revealed preoperative PI-LL mismatch as the only factor that significantly influenced this dichotomous separation postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the critical preoperative mismatch of 26.4° with 68% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Despite this different radiographic consequence, the two groups had an equally successful clinical outcome with no significant difference in ODI scores. CONCLUSIONS: As long as the ASD characteristics are consistent with the authors' exclusion criteria, the short-segment MIS triad served as an excellent surgical option in the patients with preoperative PI-LL mismatch < 26.4°, but the technique also worked well even in those with a mismatch > 26.4°, although ideal spinopelvic alignment targets were not necessarily achieved in these patients.

Favorable cervical extension capacity preventing loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty due to spontaneous restoration of initial lordosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical laminoplasty is a common approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was associated with lower extension motion of the cervical spine before laminoplasty. PURPOSE: To analyze the possible causes of preoperative cervical extension capacity affecting LCL after laminoplasty by evaluating the changes in cervical lordosis (CL) at different stages. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventy-two patients undergoing laminoplasty due to multilevel CSM. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic parameters included CL, extension CL (eCL), flexion CL (fCL), range of motion (ROM), extension ROM (eROM), flexion ROM (fROM) and LCL. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and neck disability index (NDI) score. METHODS: The data were recorded before surgery and at 3- and 24-month follow-up. All patients completed a cervical extension test preoperatively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of eROM was constructed to discriminate the patients with and without postoperative kyphotic deformity. RESULTS: According to the optimal cut-off value of eROM, the patients were divided into two groups: extension group (eROM≥9.3°) and control group (eROM<9.3°). The radiographic outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in CL, eCL, fCL and ROM between the two groups. Both eROM and fROM were significantly different in the two groups. There was a significant change in CL in the extension group at 3-month follow-up and in the control group at 24-month follow-up. The extension group exhibited significantly lower LCL compared with the control group at follow-up. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in the JOA recovery rate, while the NDI score was significantly different at 24-month follow-up. The positivity ratio of the extension test was significantly greater in the extension group than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: eROM in patients with favorable preoperative cervical extension capacity (eROM≥9.3°) consisted of the actual extension capacity and compensatory flexion. The cervical alignment would be spontaneously restored to its initial lordosis in the short term after laminoplasty. These patients had no substantial LCL at 24-month follow-up and would be good candidates for laminoplasty.

Does the Extent of Rod Bending and Actual Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch Affect Quality of Life?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate any mismatch between rod bending and actual lordosis during posterior lumbar instrumentation and its effects on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. METHODS: Patient records for posterior lumbar fusion in 2018-2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiologic parameters consisted of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, L1S1 lumbar lordosis, lumbosacral angle, the distance between the posterior wall of the vertebra and the rod, lordosis of the rod. The postoperative QOL of patients was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index. The patients were grouped postoperative into Group-1 (minimal/moderate disability) and Group-2 (severe disability/crippled/bed bound). RESULTS: Total of 133 patients were included; 99 women, 34 men. The difference was significant for patients with diabetes to be presented in the more disabled Group-2. The distance between the posterior vertebral wall and the rod was found to be short in Group-2. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal lumbar Cobb angles were significantly higher in Group-2. The changing degree of pain was found to score high in Group-2. The postoperative visual analog scale was high in Group-2. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative lumbar sagittal Cobb and rod Cobb-angles was found to be high in Group-2. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study confirm the importance of considering the preoperative actual lumbar lordosis during bending and maintaining it as much as possible. To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated the effect of rod bending on quality of life (QOL) and supports that this might be affected in case of any mismatches.

The Advantages of 4-rod Construct over the 2-rod Techniques in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients who Underwent Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study we compared clinicoradiologic outcomes and complication profiles of the traditional 2-rod construct versus the 4-rod construct in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 208 ASD patients at 2 referral centers who underwent lumbar PSO and long fusion from thoracic to the pelvis. Two different techniques, including the 4-rod construct and the traditional 2-rod technique, were used at the PSO level. Clinicoradiologic outcomes and complication profiles of the patients were documented and compared statistically between the groups. RESULTS: The 4-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture (44.8% vs. 26.4%, P < 0.01), pedicular screw loosening at the PSO level (25.3% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.04), and reoperation (49.4% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.02). Radiologically, the 4-rod construct was associated with higher degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) (-37.4°vs. -26.8°; P < 0.01) and improved pelvic tilt (PT) (-17.2° vs. -9.9°; P < 0.01) and sacral vertical axis (SVA) corrections (-211.5° vs. -192.2°; P = 0.04). Overall, the 4-rod construct was associated with improved quality of life (P = 0.04) and statistically lower Oswestry Disability Index score at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the 4-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture and pedicular screw loosening at the osteotomy level, higher degree of LL correction and improved PT and SVA than the 2-rod technique. The 4-rod construct was also associated with improved quality of life and Oswestry Disability Index and lower complication profiles.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a tantalum cage: lumbar lordosis redistribution and sacral slope restoration with a modified posterior technique.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a commonly used procedure in spine surgery, has the advantage of a lower incidence of nerve lesions compared to the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique. The intersomatic arthrodesis has always been carried out with a single tantalum cage normally used for PLIF. Tantalum is a metal that is particularly used in orthopedic surgery. It has a modulus of elasticity similar to marrow and leads to high primary stability of the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was a retrospective monocentric observational study evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes of tantalum cages in a modified TLIF technique with posterior instrumentation and autologous and/or homologous posterolateral bone grafting. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and the increase in or redistribution of lumbar lordosis. The intersomatic arthrodesis was always carried out with a single tantalum cage normally used for PLIF to reduce the neurological risk. We retrospectively studied 105 patients who were treated with a modified unilateral TLIF approach by two surgeons between 2013 and 2018. We evaluated the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain, global lumbar lordosis, lordosis of L4-sacrum, segmental lordosis of functional motion units that underwent arthrodesis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and the sacral slope in 77 patients. All patients were suffering from grade III or IV Pfirrmann, instability, or foraminal post-laminectomy stenosis and/or grade I-II degenerative spondylolisthesis or low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. They had no significant sagittal imbalance, with a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of < 5 mm. The average follow-up duration was 30 months. RESULTS: We achieved excellent clinical results, with only four cases of failure (5.2%). Moreover, we noticed a statistically significant redistribution of lumbar lordosis, with an average percentage increase in L4-S1 lordosis equal to 19.9% (P < 0.001), an average increase in the L4-S1/Lumbar lordosis (LL) ratio from 0.53 to 0.63 (P < 0.001), and a mean percentage increase in sacral slope equal to 7.6% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thanks to the properties of tantalum, our modified single-portal TLIF technique is a valid surgical solution to obtain a solid arthrodesis and restore the correct lumbar lordosis distribution while reducing neurological complications and the number of failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Trial registration statement: retrospective observational study, no trial registration.

Effects of Spinal Deformities on Hiatal Hernia Occurrence and Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Spinal deformities such as kyphosis, lordosis, and scoliosis have demonstrated a possible association between these deformities. Our hypothesis is that the presence of spinal deformities will increase the risk of hiatal hernia recurrence after repair. METHODS: The following data was retrospectively gleaned for patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair (1997-2022): age, sex, date of hiatal hernia repair, presence and type of spinal deformity, Cobb angle, type of hiatal hernia and size, type of hiatal hernia repair, recurrence and size, time to recurrence, reoperation, type of reoperation, and time to reoperation. RESULTS: Spinal deformities were present in 15.8% of 546 patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair, with a distribution of 21.8% kyphosis, 2.3% lordosis, 58.6% scoliosis, and 17.2% multiple. There was no difference in sex or age between groups. Spinal deformity patients were more likely to have types III and IV hiatal hernias (52.3% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.02) and larger hernias (median 5 [3-8] vs. 4 [2-6], p = 0.01). There was no difference in access, fundoplication use, or mesh use between groups. However, these patients had a higher recurrence rate (47.7% vs 30.0%, p = 0.001) and a shorter time to recurrence (months) (10.3 [5.6-25.1] vs 19.2 [9.8-51.0], p = 0.02). Cobb angle did not affect recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal deformity patients were more likely to have more complex and larger hiatal hernias. They were at higher risk of hiatal hernia recurrence after repair with shorter times to recurrence. This is a group that requires special attention with additional preoperative counseling and possibly use of surgical adjuncts in repair.

The role of leisure-time physical activity in maintaining cervical lordosis after anterior cervical fusion and its impact on the motor function in patients with hirayama disease: a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment has been increasingly performed in Hirayama disease (HD) patients to limit excessive neck flexion and restore cervical lordosis. However, postoperative recurrence of cervical lordosis loss may restart the progress of HD. Many studies have demonstrated a relationship between neck muscle strength and cervical lordosis, and it is widely accepted that leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) can increase muscle strength. However, there are few reports about the correlation between LTPA and maintenance of postoperative cervical curvature. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the cervical lordosis and motor function before and after operation in HD patients and to analyze the impact of postoperative LTPA levels on the changes in these measurements. METHODS: C2-7 Cobb were measured in 91 HD patients before, 2-5 days and approximately 2 years after operation. Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and handgrip strength (HGS) were performed in all patients before and approximately 2 years after operation, and both cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of posterior cervical muscles were measured in 62 patients. Long-form international Physical Activity Questionnaire and its different domains was administered to all patients at postoperative 2-year assessments. RESULTS: The C2-7 Cobb was larger immediately and approximately 2 years after operation than that at preoperative assessment (P < 0.05). The preoperative to postoperative change in C2-7 Cobb was associated with postoperative changes in the symptomatic-side HGS and bilateral MUNE measurements (P < 0.05). Importantly, the patients performing LTPA had greater improvements in C2-7 Cobb from immediate to approximately 2 years after operation and greater C2-7 Cobb at last follow-up than those without LTPA, and postoperative improvements in both symptomatic-side MUNE measurements and symptomatic-side HGS were also greater in the former than in the latter (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative LTPA has a positive effect on recovery/maintenance of cervical lordosis after operation, which may alleviate the motor unit loss of distal upper limbs in HD patients. Therefore, postoperative LTPA may be beneficial for postoperative rehabilitation or early conservative treatment of HD patients.

A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.

OBJECTIVE: Interbody fusion is the primary method for achieving arthrodesis across the lumbosacral junction in the setting of degenerative pathologies, such as spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. Two common techniques are anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In recent years, interbody design and technology have advanced, and most earlier studies comparing ALIF and TLIF did not specifically assess the lumbosacral junction. This study compared changes in radiographic and clinical parameters between patients undergoing modern-era single-level ALIF and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TLIF at L5-S1. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent single-segment L5-S1 ALIF or MIS TLIF performed by the senior authors over a 6-year interval (January 1, 2016-November 30, 2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Upright radiographs were used to determine pre- and postoperative lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height. Improvements in patient-reported outcome scores (Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36) were also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients (58 [54%] men, 50 [46%] women; mean [SD] age 57.6 [13.5] years) were included in the study. ALIF was performed in 49 patients, and TLIF was performed in 59 patients. The most common treatment indications were spondylolisthesis (50%, 54/108) and spondylosis (46%, 50/108). The cohorts did not differ in terms of intraoperative (p > 0.99) or postoperative (p = 0.73) complication rates. The mean (SD) hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing TLIF than ALIF (1.3 [0.6] days vs 2.0 [1.4] days, p < 0.001). Both techniques significantly improved L5-S1 segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height (p ≤ 0.008). ALIF versus TLIF significantly increased mean [SD] segmental lordosis (12.5° [7.3°] vs 2.0° [5.7°], p < 0.001), disc angle (14.8° [5.5°] vs 3.0° [6.1°], p < 0.001), and neuroforaminal height (4.5 [4.6] mm vs 2.4 [3.0] mm, p = 0.008). Improvements in patient-reported outcome parameters and reoperation rates were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: When treating patients at a single segment across the lumbosacral junction, ALIF resulted in significantly greater increases in segmental lordosis, L5-S1 disc angle, and neuroforaminal height compared with MIS TLIF. Improvements in clinical parameters and reoperation rates were similar between the 2 techniques.

Height Gain Following Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Height gain following a surgical procedure for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is incompletely understood, and it is unknown if height gain correlates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ASD surgery. Patients with baseline, 6-week, and subanalysis of 1-year postoperative full-body radiographic and PROM data were examined. Correlation analysis examined relationships between vertical height differences and PROMs. Regression analysis was utilized to preoperatively estimate T1-S1 and S1-ankle height changes. RESULTS: This study included 198 patients (mean age, 57 years; 69% female); 147 patients (74%) gained height. Patients with height loss, compared with those who gained height, experienced greater increases in thoracolumbar kyphosis (2.81° compared with -7.37°; p < 0.001) and thoracic kyphosis (12.96° compared with 4.42°; p = 0.003). For patients with height gain, sagittal and coronal alignment improved from baseline to postoperatively: 25° to 21° for pelvic tilt (PT), 14° to 3° for pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and 60 mm to 17 mm for sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (all p < 0.001). The full-body mean height gain was 7.6 cm, distributed as follows: sella turcica-C2, 2.9 mm; C2-T1, 2.8 mm; T1-S1 (trunk gain), 3.8 cm; and S1-ankle (lower-extremity gain), 3.3 cm (p < 0.001). T1-S1 height gain correlated with the thoracic Cobb angle correction and the maximum Cobb angle correction (p = 0.002). S1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT, PI-LL, and SVA (p < 0.001). T1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT (p < 0.001) and SVA (p = 0.03). Trunk height gain correlated with improved Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) Appearance scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.02). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression scores correlated with S1-ankle height gain (r = -0.19; p = 0.03) and C2-T1 height gain (r = -0.18; p = 0.04). A 1° correction in a thoracic scoliosis Cobb angle corresponded to a 0.2-mm height gain, and a 1° correction in a thoracolumbar scoliosis Cobb angle resulted in a 0.25-mm height gain. A 1° improvement in PI-LL resulted in a 0.2-mm height gain. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing ASD surgery experienced height gain following deformity correction, with a mean full-body height gain of 7.6 cm. Height gain can be estimated preoperatively with predictive ratios, and height gain was correlated with improvements in reported SRS-22r appearance and PROMIS scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Modified unilateral iliac screw fixation with partial reduction in the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis at L5/S1 in adult patients: introduction of key technique, report of clinical outcomes and analysis of spinopelvic parameters.

BACKGROUND: Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains challenging. Spinopelvic fixation such as iliac screw (IS) was developed to deal with HGS. However concerns regarding constructs prominence and increased infection-related revision surgery have complicated it's use. We aim to introduce the modified iliac screw (IS) technique in treating high-grade L5/S1 spondylolisthesis and it's clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: Patients with L5/S1 HGS who underwent modified IS fixation were enrolled. Pre- and postsurgical upright full spine radiographs were obtained to analyze sagittal imbalance, spinopelvic parameters, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), slip percentage, slip angle (SA), and lumbosacral angle (LSA). Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively for clinical outcomes assessment. Estimated blood loss, operating time, perioperative complications and revision surgery were documented. RESULTS: From Jan 2018 to March 2020, 32 patients (15 males) with mean age of 58.66 ± 7.77 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 49 months. The mean operation duration was 171.67 ± 36.66 min. At the last follow-up: (1) the VAS and ODI score were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (2) PI increased by an average of 4.3°, the slip percent, SA and LSA were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (3) four patients (16.7%) with global sagittal imbalance recovered a good sagittal alignment, PI-LL within ± 10° was observed in all patients. One patient experienced wound infection. One patient underwent a revision surgery due to pseudoarthrosis at L5/S1. CONCLUSION: The modified IS technique is safe and effective in treating L5/S1 HGS. Sparing use of offset connector could reduce hardware prominence, leading to lower wound infection rate and less revision surgery. The long-term clinical affection of increased PI value is unknown.

Assessing the Usefulness of Motor-Evoked Potential Changes in Disc Height Determination in Patients with Degenerative Disc Diseases Treated with Interbody Fusion.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of improved motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in treatment of degenerative disc diseases using the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of one hundred and eleven patients who underwent TLIF were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were preoperative radiculopathy and presence of neurological deterioration without previous surgery. Improved MEP amplitudes reaching the baseline MEP amplitudes of the contralateral side at the same level were used as the thresholds for determining the final disc height and cage size during surgery. Cage size, disc heights of the three areas, foraminal area, and global spinal and local balance were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (3 male and 19 female) with a mean age of 61.9 ± 8.9 years were included into the study. The mean height of cages was 10.3 ± 1.4 mm (range, 8-14 mm). The mean improvement in MEP amplitude was 27 ± 11% (range, 15-50%). The anterior, middle, and posterior disc heights improved to 2 ± 1.6, 2.7 ± 1.7, and 1.7 ± 1.3 mm, respectively. The improvement in the middle disc height was significantly greater (p < 0.05). Segmental lordosis improved from 16.2° ± 10.7° to 19.4° ± 9.2°. Additionally, lumbar lordosis improved from 46.7° ± 14.6° to 51.2° ± 11.2° (p < 0.05). Cage height or improvements in disc height was not correlated with MEP changes. However, there was a positive correlation between ipsilateral foraminal area restoration and MEP changes (r=0.501; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Improved MEP amplitudes reaching the baseline MEP amplitudes of the contralateral side of the same spinal level might be a useful threshold for determining the final minimum disc height during TLIF surgery with satisfactory postoperative radiological results, including sagittal and segmental radiological parameters.

The Effects of the Use of Single-Screw Plates (Univertebral Screw Plates) versus Double-Screw Plates (Bivertebral Screw Plates) on Fusion After One-Level or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the effects of the use of univertebral screw plates (USPs) and bivertebral screw plates (BSPs) on fusion in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: Forty-two patients who were treated with USPs or BSPs after 1-level or 2-level ACDF and had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were included in the study. Fusion and the global cervical lordosis angle were evaluated using direct radiographs and computed tomography images of the patients. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Neck Disability Index and visual analog scale. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated using USPs and 25 patients using BSPs. Fusion was achieved in all patients who underwent BSP fixation (1-level ACDF, 15 patients; 2-level ACDF, 10 patients) and 16 of the 17 patients who underwent USP fixation (1-level ACDF, 11 patients; 2-level ACDF, 6 patients). The plate of the patient with fixation failure had to be removed because it was symptomatic. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the immediate postoperative period and at the last follow-up in terms of global cervical lordosis angle, visual analog scale score, and Neck Disability Index of all patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF surgery (P < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Although USPs are less costly and easier to implant, the effect of USPs and BSPs on fusion and clinical outcomes is similar. Thus, surgeons may prefer to use USPs after 1-level or 2-level ACDF.

Analysis of risk factors for contralateral symptomatic foraminal stenosis after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

PURPOSE: To analyze the risk factors of contralateral symptomatic foraminal stenosis (FS) after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to guide and standardize the operation process of unilateral TLIF to reduce the occurrence of contralateral symptomatic FS. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken on 487 patients with lumbar degeneration who underwent unilateral TLIF in the Department of Spinal Surgery of Ningbo Sixth Hospital between January 2017 and January 2021, comprising 269 males and 218 females, with a mean age of 57.1 years (range, 48-77 years). Cases of intraoperative improper operations, such as screw deviation, postoperative hematoma, and contralateral disc herniation, were excluded, and cases of nerve root symptoms caused by contralateral FS were analyzed. Post-surgery, 23 patients with nerve root symptoms caused by contralateral FS were categorized as group A, and 60 patients without nerve root symptoms were randomly selected as group B during the same period. The general data (gender, age, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), and diagnosis) and imaging parameters before and after operation (including contralateral foramen area (CFA), lumbar lordosis angle (LL), segmental lordosis angle (SL), disc height (DH), foramen height (FH), foramen width (FW), fusion cage position, and the difference between postoperative and preoperative) were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariate analysis was undertaken through logistics analysis to determine the independent risk factors. Additionally, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared immediately before surgery and one year after surgery, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for evaluation. RESULTS: The patients in this study were followed up for a period of 19-25 (22.8atien months. Among them, 23 cases (4.72% incidence) were diagnosed with contralaterally symptomatic FS after the surgery. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences between the two groups in CFA, SL, FW, and cage coronal position. Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative contralateral foramen area (OR = 1.176, 95% CI (1.012, 1.367)), small segmental lordosis angle (OR = 2.225, 95% CI (1.124, 4.406)), small intervertebral foramen width (OR = 2.706, 95% CI (1.028, 7.118)), and cage coronal position not crossing the midline (OR = 1.567, 95% CI (1.142, 2.149)) as independent risk factors for contralateral symptomatic FS after unilateral TLIF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the pain VAS score between the two groups one year after the operation. In contrast, there was a significant difference in the JOA score between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors for contralateral symptomatic FS after TLIF include preoperative contralateral intervertebral foramen stenosis, a small segmental lordosis angle, a small intervertebral foramen width, and the coronal position of the cage not crossing the midline. For patients with these risk factors, it is recommended to carefully lock the screw rod during the recovery of lumbar lordosis and ensure that the coronal position of the fusion cage is implanted beyond the midline. If necessary, preventive decompression should also be considered. However, this study did not quantify the imaging data for each risk factor, and further research is needed to improve our understanding of the topic.