Antidepressant-like effect of losartan involves TRKB transactivation from angiotensin receptor type 2 (AGTR2) and recruitment of FYN.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is associated with peripheral fluid homeostasis and cardiovascular function, but recent evidence also suggests a functional role in the brain. RAS regulates physiological and behavioral parameters related to the stress response, including depressive symptoms. Apparently, RAS can modulate levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and TRKB, which are important in the neurobiology of depression and antidepressant action. However, the interaction between the BDNF/TRKB system and RAS in depression has not been investigated before. Accordingly, in the forced swimming test, we observed an antidepressant-like effect of systemic losartan but not with captopril or enalapril treatment. Moreover, infusion of losartan into the ventral hippocampus (vHC) and prelimbic prefrontal cortex (PL) mimicked the consequences of systemically injected losartan, whereas K252a (a blocker of TRK) infused into these brain areas impaired such effect. PD123319, an antagonist of AT2 receptor (AGTR2), also prevented the systemic losartan effect when infused into PL but not into vHC. Cultured cortical cells of rat embryos revealed that angiotensin II (ANG2), possibly through AGTR2, increased the surface levels of TRKB and its coupling to FYN, a SRC family kinase. Higher Agtr2 levels in cortical cells were reduced after stimulation with glutamate, and only under this condition an interaction between losartan and ANG2 was achieved. TRKB/AGTR2 heterodimers were also observed, in MG87 cells GFP-tagged AGTR2 co-immunoprecipitated with TRKB. Therefore, the antidepressant-like effect of losartan is proposed to occur through a shift of ANG2 towards AGTR2, followed by coupling of TRK/FYN and putative TRKB transactivation. Thus, the blockade of AGTR1 has therapeutic potential as a novel antidepressant therapy.

Losartan protects liver against ischaemia/reperfusion injury through PPAR-γ activation and receptor for advanced glycation end-products down-regulation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: PPAR-γ has been reported to be a protective regulator in ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) plays a major role in the innate immune response, and its expression is associated with PPAR-γ activation. Several angiotensin receptor blockers possess partial agonist activities towards PPAR-γ. Therefore, this study investigated the action of losartan, particularly with regard to PPAR-γ activation and RAGE signalling pathways during hepatic I/R. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Mice were subjected to 60 min of ischaemia followed by 6 h of reperfusion. Losartan (0.1, 1, 3 and 10 mg · kg⁻¹) was administered 1 h prior to ischaemia and immediately before reperfusion. GW9662, a PPAR-γ antagonist, was administered 30 min prior to first pretreatment with losartan. KEY RESULTS: Losartan enhanced the DNA-binding activity of PPAR-γ in I/R. Losartan attenuated the increased serum alanine aminotransferase activity, TNF-α and IL-6 levels, and nuclear concentrations of NF-κB in I/R. GW9662 reversed these beneficial effects. Losartan caused a decrease in apoptosis as assessed by TUNEL assay, in release of cytochrome c and in cleavage of caspase-3, and these effects were abolished by GW9662 administration. Losartan attenuated not only I/R-induced RAGE overexpression, but also its downstream early growth response protein-1-dependent macrophage inflammatory protein 2 level; phosphorylation of p38, ERK and JNK; and subsequent c-Jun phosphorylation. GW9662 reversed these effects of losartan administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that losartan ameliorates I/R-induced liver damage through PPAR-γ activation and down-regulation of the RAGE signalling pathway.

Development and evaluation of sustained release losartan potassium matrix tablet using kollidon SR as release retardant

The present study was undertaken to develop sustained release (SR) matrix tablets of losartan potassium, an angiotensin-II antagonist for the treatment of hypertension. The tablets were prepared by direct compression method, along with Kollidon SR as release retardant polymer. The amount of losartan potassium remains fixed (100 mg) for all the three formulations whereas the amounts of Kollidon SR were 250 mg, 225 mg, and 200 mg for F-1, F-2, and F-3 respectively. The evaluation involves three stages: the micromeritic properties evaluation of granules, physical property studies of tablets, and in-vitro release kinetics studies. The USP apparatus type II was selected to perform the dissolution test, and the dissolution medium was 900 mL phosphate buffer pH 6.8. The test was carried out at 75 rpm, and the temperature was maintained at 37 ºC ± 0.5 ºC. The release kinetics was analyzed using several kinetics models. Higher polymeric content in the matrix decreased the release rate of drug. At lower polymeric level, the rate and extent of drug release were enhanced. All the formulations followed Higuchi release kinetics where the Regression co-efficient (R²) values are 0.958, 0.944, and 0.920 for F-1, F-2, and F-3 respectively, and they exhibited diffusion dominated drug release. Statistically significant (P<0.05) differences were found among the drug release profile from different level of polymeric matrices. The release mechanism changed from non-fickian (n=0.489 for F-1) to fickian (n=0.439 and 0.429 for F-2, and F-3 respectively) as a function of decreasing the polymer concentration. The Mean Dissolution Time (MDT) values were increased with the increase in polymer concentration.

O presente estudo foi realizado para desenvolver (SR) matriz de comprimidos de liberação sustentada de losartana, um antagonista da angiotensina II, para o tratamento da hipertensão arterial. Os comprimidos foram preparados pelo método de compressão direta com Kollidon SR como polímero de liberação lenta. A quantidade de losartana potássica permanece fixa (100 mg) para todas as três formulações enquanto que as quantidades de Kollidon SR foram de 250 mg, 225 mg e 200 mg para F-1, F-2 e F-3, respectivamente. A avaliação envolve três etapas- propriedades micromeríticas dos grânulos, estudo das propriedades físicas dos comprimidos e estudos de cinética de liberação in vitro.. Selecionoou-se o aparelho USP tipo II para realizar o teste de dissolução em meio com 900 mL de tampão fosfato pH 6,8 . O teste foi realizado em 75 rpm e a temperatura foi mantida a 37 ºC ± 0.5 ºC. Analisou-se a cinética de liberação utilizando-se vários modelos cinéticos. Conteúdo mais alto de polímero na matriz reduziu a taxa de liberação do fármaco. Em níveis mais baixos de polímero, a taxa e a extensão de liberação do fármaco foram aumentados. Todas as formulações seguiram a cinética de liberação de Higuchi, em que os valores do coeficiente de regressão (R2) foram 0,958 , 0,944 e 0,920 para F-1, F-2 e F-3, respectivamente, e elas apresentaram liberação do fármaco dominada pela difusão. Encontraram-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas (P<0,05) entre os perfis de liberação do fármaco com diferentes níveis de matrizes poliméricas. O mecanismo de liberação mudou de não-fickiano(n=0,489 para F-1) para fickiano(n=0,439 e 0,429 para F-2 e F-3, respectivamente) em função da diminuição da concentração de polímero. Os valores do Tempo de Dissolução Média (TDM) aumentaram com o aumento da concentração polímero.

Antagonist of the type-1 ANG II receptor prevents against LPS-induced septic shock in rats.

PURPOSE: Type 1 angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonists have anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether losartan (LOS), an AT1 receptor antagonist, reduces lung damage by inhibiting the induction of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein and cytokines by lipopolysaccharide (LPS; serotype: O127:B8) in a rat model. METHODS: We used male Wistar rats. Control group rats received a 0.9% NaCl solution. The LOS + LPS group rats received LOS (50 mg kg(-1)) before LPS (7.5 mg kg(-1)) administration. LPS group rats received injection of LPS (7.5 mg kg(-1)). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We performed immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and western blot analysis to examine the suppressive effects of LOS on LPS-induced cytokine induction. Plasma concentrations of cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-alpha) and HMGB1 (p < 0.05) were markedly reduced in the LOS + LPS group compared to the LPS group. LOS also inhibited the LPS-mediated decrease in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity (p < 0.05). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for ACE2 in lungs from both control and LOS + LPS groups. The intensity and degree of ACE2 labeling in lung tissue sections from the LPS group were markedly reduced compared to the control and LOS + LPS groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, RAW264.7 murine macrophages were stimulated with LPS, with or without simultaneous LOS treatment, resulting in inhibition of IkappaB phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LOS improved lung injury in an endotoxin shock model system by an anti-inflammatory action that inhibits reduction of ACE2.

Ouabain at nanomolar concentration promotes synthesis and release of angiotensin II from the endothelium of the tail vascular bed of spontaneously hypertensive rats.

The effects of 1 nM ouabain (OUA) on the contractile actions of phenylephrine (PHE, 0.001-100 microg) and functional activity of the sodium pump (NKA) in isolated-perfused tail vascular beds from WKY and SHR were investigated. In preparations from SHR, perfusion with OUA in the presence of endothelium (E+) increased the sensitivity (pED50) of PHE (before: 2.14 +/- 0.06 versus after: 2.47 +/- 0.07; P < 0.05) without altering the maximal response (Emax). After endothelial damage, OUA reduced the Emax of PHE in SHR (before: 350 +/- 29 versus after: 293 +/- 25 mm Hg; P < 0.05). In SHR/E+, pretreatment with losartan (10 microM) or enalaprilat (1 microM) prevented the increased sensitivity to PHE induced by OUA. OUA increased NKA activity in SHR/E+ (before: 45 +/- 6 versus after: 58 +/- 5%, P < 0.05). Losartan (10 mg/Kg, i.v.) also abolished the increment in systolic and diastolic blood pressure induced by OUA (0.18 microg/Kg, i.v.) in anesthetized SHR. OUA did not alter the actions of PHE in either anesthetized WKY rats or vascular preparations. Results suggest that 1 nM OUA increased the vascular reactivity to PHE only in SHR/E+. This effect is mediated by OUA-induced activation of endothelial angiotensin converting enzyme that promotes the local formation of angiotensin II, which sensitizes the vascular smooth muscle to the actions of PHE.

Losartan reduces the costs associated with nephropathy and end-stage renal disease from type 2 diabetes: Economic evaluation of the RENAAL study from a Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: The Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM [non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus] with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study demonstrated the renoprotective effects of losartan in patients with nephropathy from type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To perform an economic evaluation of the costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from a Canadian public health perspective, based on the clinical outcomes reported in the RENAAL study. METHODS: ESRD-related costs were determined by estimating the mean number of days with ESRD multiplied by the daily cost of ESRD (140 dollars); mean days with ESRD were calculated by subtracting the area under the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for time to the first event of ESRD or all-cause mortality from the area under the curve for all-cause mortality. Daily ESRD cost was determined using Canadian specific data sources. ESRD-related cost savings with losartan were obtained by subtracting the ESRD-related costs of the losartan group from those of the placebo group. Net cost savings were ESRD-related cost savings with losartan minus the drug cost of losartan. RESULTS: Losartan reduced the number of ESRD days by 33.6 per patient over 3.5 years (95% CI 10.9 to 56.3) compared with placebo. Losartan reduced ESRD-related costs by 4,695 dollars per randomized patient over 3.5 years (95% CI 1,523 dollars to 7,868 dollars). After accounting for the drug cost of losartan, net cost savings with losartan were 3,675 dollars per randomized patient over 3.5 years. CONCLUSION: Losartan therapy for patients with nephropathy from type 2 diabetes reduces the clinical incidence of ESRD and can result in considerable cost savings for the Canadian public health system.

A screening study on the liability of eight different female sex steroids to inhibit CYP2C9, 2C19 and 3A4 activities in human liver microsomes.

The aim of this study was to screen the inhibitory potential of different clinically used oestrogen and progestin hormones on CYP2C9, 2C19 and 3A4 activities in human liver microsomes. The degree of inhibition by desogestrel, 3-ketodesogestrel, 17-beta-oestradiol, gestodene, aethinyloestradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone or L-norgestrel were studied at 100 microM on losartan oxidation (CYP2C9), R-omeprazole 5'-hydroxylation (CYP2C19) and R-omeprazole sulphoxidation (CYP3A4) with a 10-min preincubation with NADPH in human liver microsomes prepared from 6 individual genotyped donor livers. Aethinyloestradiol was found to be a potent inhibitor (55% mean inhibition; 95% CI 32% to 79%) of losartan oxidation (CYP2C9) and R-omeprazole 5-hydroxylation (70%; 63% to 77%) (CYP2C19), while it had little effect on R-omeprazole sulphoxidation (CYP3A4) activity. 17-beta-Oestradiol did not produce significant inhibition on any of the studied enzyme activities. Of the progestin hormones studied, gestodene and 3-ketodesogestrel were potent inhibitors of CYP2C19 (57%; 47% to 67% and 51%; 29% to 45%) and CYP3A4 (45%; 30% to 59% and 40%; 19% to 62%), but had little effect on the CYP2C9 activity. In addition, medroxyprogesterone acetate was found to inhibit CYP2C9 (55%; 45% to 65%), while not having significant effect on 2C19 or 3A4. In conclusion, the liability of clinically used female sex steroids to inhibit CYP2C9, 2C19 and 3A4 activities in human liver microsomes is very distinctive and these differences among both the oestrogen and progestin hormones may, at least in part, explain the variable results from clinical trials examining inhibitory effects of hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives on drug metabolism.

Dissociation between the circulating renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin II receptors in central losartan-induced hypertension.

Losartan, an AT1 angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor non-peptide antagonist, induces an increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) when injected intracerebroventricularly (icv) into rats. The present study investigated possible effector mechanisms of the increase in MAP induced by icv losartan in unanesthetized rats. Male Holtzman rats (280-300 g, N = 6/group) with a cannula implanted into the anterior ventral third ventricle received an icv injection of losartan (90 micro g/2 micro l) that induced a typical peak pressor response within 5 min. In one group of animals, this response to icv losartan was completely reduced from 18 +/- 1 to 4 +/- 2 mmHg by intravenous (iv) injection of losartan (2.5-10 mg/kg), and in another group, it was partially reduced from 18 +/- 3 to 11 +/- 2 mmHg by iv prazosin (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), an alpha1-adrenergic antagonist (P<0.05). Captopril (10 mg/kg), a converting enzyme inhibitor, injected iv in a third group inhibited the pressor response to icv losartan from 24 +/- 3 to 7 +/- 2 mmHg (P<0.05). Propranolol (10 mg/kg), a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, injected iv in a fourth group did not alter the pressor response to icv losartan. Plasma renin activity and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity were not altered by icv losartan in other animals. The results suggest that the pressor effect of icv losartan depends on angiotensinergic and alpha1-adrenoceptor activation, but not on increased circulating ANG II.

Diverse effects of chronic treatment with losartan, fosinopril, and amlodipine on apoptosis, angiotensin II in the left ventricle of hypertensive rats.

This study was designed to investigate diverse effects of angiotensin II (AngII) type I receptor antagonists, losartan, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, fosinopril, and calcium channel blockade, amlodipine on cardiomyocyte apoptosis and AngII in the left ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The SHRs were randomized to four groups: SHR-L (treated with losartan, 30 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), SHR-F (with fosinopril, 10 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), SHR-A (with amlodipine, 10 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) and SHR-C (with placebo). The cardiomyocyte apoptosis was examined by in situ TDT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling, AngII concentrations of plasma and myocardium were measured by radio immunoassay at 8 and 16 weeks of the study respectively. The results showed that: (1) compared with SHR-C at 8 and 16 weeks respectively; the systolic blood pressure was decreased similarly in the three treatment groups. Left ventricular weight and mass indexes were reduced in the three treatment groups. The latter parameter at 16 weeks was lower in SHR-F than that in the other two treatment groups. (2) Compared with SHR-C, the cardiomyocyte apoptotic index (APOI) was reduced significantly at 8 weeks only in SHR-F, and at 16 weeks in all three treatment groups. The APOI of SHR-F was lowest among the three treatment groups examined at latter endpoint. (3) Compared with SHR-C at both endpoints of this study, plasma and myocardium AngII levels were increased in SHR-L. However, plasma AngII concentrations were not altered in SHR-F and SHR-A, myocardium AngII concentrations were reduced significantly at 8 weeks only in SHR-F, and at 16 weeks in SHR-F and SHR-A. Meanwhile, myocardium AngII in SHR-F at 16 weeks was lower than that in SHR-A. The results of this study indicate that losartan, fosinopril, and amlodipine each effectively reverses heart hypertrophy and inhibits cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and fosinopril may be most effective in these cardioprotective effects. These findings suggest that the effects of the three blockers on myocardiocyte apoptosis and left ventricular hypertrophy were related to inhibition of the myocardium rennin-angiotensin-aldsterone system.

Differential effects of ACE-inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on fibrinolysis and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive postmenopausal women.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of trandolapril and losartan on plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive postmenopausal women. We studied 89 hypertensive (diastolic blood pressure >90 and <110 mm Hg) postmenopausal women, aged 51 to 60 years not taking any hormone replacement therapy. Diabetic, obese, and smoking patients were excluded. After a 4-week placebo period, they were randomized to receive 2 mg of oral trandolapril (n=45) or 50 mg of oral losartan (n=44) for 12 weeks according to a double-blind, parallel group design. At the end of the placebo and active treatment periods, blood pressure (BP) was measured, plasma samples were drawn to evaluate PAI-1 antigen levels, and insulin sensitivity was assessed. Both trandolapril and losartan reduced systolic BP (by a mean of 16.9 mm Hg and 15.2 mm Hg, respectively, P < .01 v placebo) and diastolic BP (by a mean of 13.1 mm Hg and 11.9 mm Hg, respectively, P < .01 v placebo) with no difference between the two treatments. The PAI-1 antigen levels were significantly decreased by trandolapril (from 36.9+/-21 ng/dL to 27.2+/-17 ng/dL, P < .05), but not by losartan (from 35.3+/-22 ng/dL to 37.1+/-23 ng/dL, P=not significant). Glucose infusion rate was significantly increased by trandolapril (from 6.67+/-0.56 mg/min/kg to 7.9+/-0.65 mg/min/kg, P < .05), but was not significantly modified by losartan (from 6.7+/-0.47 mg/min/kg to 6.9+/-0.50 mg/min/kg, P= not significant). In the trandolapril group the PAI-1 decrease correlated with glucose infusion rate increase (r=0.36, P=.045) These results provide evidence of different effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1 antagonists on fibrinolysis and suggest that the PAI-1 decrease induced by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is related to their action on insulin sensitivity and is not dependent on angiotensin II antagonism but rather on other mechanisms. It remains to be seen whether these findings apply to other patient populations than postmenopausal women.

Chronic effects of ACE-inhibition (quinapril) and angiotensin-II-type-1 receptor blockade (losartan) on atrial natriuretic peptide in brain nuclei of rats with experimental myocardial infarction.

Alterations of the central nervous system may be important for imbalance of cardiovascular and fluid regulation in heart failure. The central renin-angiotensin and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) systems act as mutual antagonists. The effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition (quinapril, 6 mg/kg/day) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade (losartan, 10 mg/kg/day) on ANP levels in 18 selected, microdissected brain nuclei were determined in sham-operated rats and rats with left ventricular dysfunction 8 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI). Plasma ANP tended to increase in MI rats and was further increased by quinapril. ANP was decreased in 12 brain areas of MI rats. ANP concentration was also significantly decreased by quinapril in six brain nuclei including subfornical organ and organum vasculosum laminae terminalis (areas lacking blood-brain barrier), and by losartan in 16 brain nuclei outside and within the blood-brain barrier in sham operated rats. However, both quinapril and losartan prevented a further reduction of central ANP as a result of myocardial infarction. These data suggest that there are effects on central ANP that result from chronic left ventricular dysfunction as well as an ACE-inhibitor and AT1-antagonist. Mechanisms and consequences of central ANP depression remain unclear. They could, however, support systemic vasoconstriction and sodium and fluid retention.

Effect of angiotensin type I-receptor blockade on left ventricular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system is involved in cardiac remodeling. In contrast to the well-recognized salutary effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, the value of angiotensin II type I (AT(1))-receptor blockade on left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and dysfunction is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Descending thoracic aorta-banded and sham-operated guinea pigs were given either losartan (30 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) intraperitoneally) or vehicle for 8 weeks (n = 7 in each group). LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and wall thicknesses were measured echocardiographically, and LV fractional shortening, relative wall thickness, and LV mass normalized by body weight were calculated. Isolated heart function (Langendorff perfusion) was studied 8 weeks after surgery, and LV performance was assessed by maximum LV pressure and +/-dP/dt normalized by LV mass. Eight weeks after banding guinea pigs developed concentric LV hypertrophy and had decreased maximum LV pressure and +/-dP/dt normalized by LV mass; LV end-diastolic dimension and LV fractional shortening were unchanged. In band-operated guinea pigs treatment with losartan had no significant effects on any of these measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In guinea pigs with descending aortic banding, treatment with losartan for 8 weeks neither attenuates progression of pressure overload hypertrophy nor significantly improves impaired mass-normalized pressure-derived indices of LV contraction and relaxation.

Deoxycorticosterone suppresses the effects of losartan in nitric oxide-deficient hypertensive rats.

Chronic inhibition of the renin angiotensin system prevents increased BP and renal injury in N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) hypertension. However, a relationship between plasma renin activity and the protective effect of chronic angiotensin II (Ang II) blockade has not been established. With this background, this study was undertaken to evaluate how the chronic administration of deoxycortisone acetate (DOCA) modifies the effects of losartan on BP, renal injury, and other variables in L-NAME hypertensive rats. The following groups were used: Control, DOCA, L-NAME, L-NAME + losartan, L-NAME + DOCA, and L-NAME + DOCA + losartan. Tail systolic BP was measured twice a week. After 4-wk evolution, mean arterial pressure and metabolic, morphologic, and renal variables were measured. The final mean arterial pressure values were 116 +/- 6 mmHg for control, 107 +/- 2 mmHg for DOCA, 151 +/- 5 mmHg for L-NAME, 123 +/- 2 mmHg for L-NAME + losartan, 170 +/- 3 mmHg for L-NAME + DOCA, and 171 +/- 5.5 mmHg for L-NAME + DOCA + losartan. Losartan prevented microalbuminuria, hyaline arteriopathy, and glomerulosclerosis of L-NAME hypertension but was ineffective in L-NAME + DOCA-treated rats. Plasma protein was significantly reduced in the L-NAME + DOCA group when compared with control and L-NAME groups, whereas no significant differences were observed in the other groups. Plasma renin activity was suppressed in the DOCA (0.55 +/- 0.2) and L-NAME + DOCA (0.60 +/- 10.2) groups but unsuppressed in the L-NAME + DOCA + losartan group (5.8 +/- 1). The conclusion is that DOCA blocks the preventive effect of losartan on the increased BP and renal injury of L-NAME hypertension, which suggests that DOCA transforms L-NAME hypertension into an Ang II-independent model of hypertension. These data also suggest that losartan prevents L-NAME hypertension by blocking the activity of systemic Ang II.

Chronic angiotensin II antagonism with losartan in one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats: effect on cardiac hypertrophy, urinary sodium and water excretion and the natriuretic system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 7-day angiotensin II antagonism with losartan, an AT1-receptor antagonist, on systolic blood pressure, renal sodium and water excretion and on the atrial natriuretic factor system in one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats. METHODS: The one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats were separated into four groups: untreated (group 1), low-sodium diet (group 2), losartan (20 mg/kg orally, group 3) and low-sodium diet with losartan (group 4). All of the rats were kept in metabolic cages with urinary volume, urinary sodium level and water intake being evaluated daily. Body weight and blood pressure were assessed before treatment and at the end of the observation period. Renal glomerular and papillary atrial natriuretic factor receptors were assessed by radioligand binding experiments. RESULTS: No differences were observed either in body weight or in blood pressure between groups at the outset After 1 week, blood pressure was 184+/-4, 184+/-7, 170+/-5 and 78+/-8 mmHg, in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Group 3 rats failed to gain weight and had high urinary volume. In contrast, group 4 rats lost 15% of their original body weight. Both of the losartan-treated groups presented an apparently reduced cardiac hypertrophy but it was only clear in the low-sodium diet group. Both of the losartan-treated groups had high plasma renin activity. All of the three treated groups showed upregulation of glomerular and no changes in papillary atrial natriuretic factor receptors. Overall, mortality was 18, 27, 0 and 36% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Losartan administration reduces blood pressure in one-kidney, one clip rats only when combined with a low-sodium diet. Both low-sodium diet and angiotensin II antagonism upregulate renal glomerular but not papillary atrial natriuretic factor receptors, suggesting a divergent regulatory mechanism.