Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 133
Filter
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 372, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects of local radiotherapy (RT) on growth, we evaluated the chronological growth profiles and vertebral features of children with high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: Thirty-eight children who received local photon or proton beam therapy to the abdomen or retroperitoneum between January 2014 and September 2019 were included. Simple radiography of the thoracolumbar spine was performed before and every year after RT. The height and vertical length of the irradiated vertebral bodies (VBs) compared with the unirradiated VBs (vertebral body ratio, VBR) were analyzed using the linear mixed model. Shape feature analysis was performed to compare the irradiated and unirradiated vertebrae. RESULTS: The follow-up was a median of 53.5 months (range, 21-81 months) after RT. A decline in height z-scores was mainly found in the early phase after treatment. In the linear mixed model with height, the initial height (fixed, p < 0.001), sex (time interaction, p = 0.008), endocrine dysfunction (time interaction, 0.019), and age at diagnosis (fixed and time interaction, both p = 0.002) were significant. Unlike the trend in height, the change in VBR (ΔVBR) decreased gradually (p < 0.001). The ΔVBR in the group that received more than 30 Gy decreased more than in the group that received smaller doses. In the shape feature analysis, the irradiated VBs changed to a more irregular surface that were neither round nor rectangular. CONCLUSION: The irradiated VBs in children were gradually restricted compared to the unirradiated VBs in long-term follow-up, and higher RT doses were significantly affected. Radiation-induced irregular features of VBs were observed.


Subject(s)
Neuroblastoma , Humans , Neuroblastoma/radiotherapy , Neuroblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Infant , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective Studies , Body Height/radiation effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Vertebral Body/diagnostic imaging , Vertebral Body/radiation effects , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 111(2): 528-538, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989720

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Vertebral compression fracture is a common complication of spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy. Development of an in vivo model is crucial to fully understand how focal radiation treatment affects vertebral integrity and biology at various dose fractionation regimens. We present a clinically relevant animal model to analyze the effects of localized, high-dose radiation on vertebral microstructure and mechanical integrity. Using this model, we test the hypothesis that fractionation of radiation dosing can reduce focused radiation therapy's harmful effects on the spine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The L5 vertebra of New Zealand white rabbits was treated with either a 24-Gy single dose of focused radiation or 3 fractionated 8-Gy doses over 3 consecutive days via the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform. Nonirradiated rabbits were used as controls. Rabbits were euthanized 6 months after irradiation, and their lumbar vertebrae were harvested for radiologic, histologic, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Localized single-dose radiation led to decreased vertebral bone volume and trabecular number and a subsequent increase in trabecular spacing and thickness at L5. Hypofractionation of the radiation dose similarly led to reduced trabecular number and increased trabecular spacing and thickness, yet it preserved normalized bone volume. Single-dose irradiated vertebrae displayed lower fracture loads and stiffness compared with those receiving hypofractionated irradiation and with controls. The hypofractionated and control groups exhibited similar fracture load and stiffness. For all vertebral samples, bone volume, trabecular number, and trabecular spacing were correlated with fracture loads and Young's modulus (P < .05). Hypocellularity was observed in the bone marrow of both irradiated groups, but osteogenic features were conserved in only the hypofractionated group. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose focal irradiation showed greater detrimental effects than hypofractionation on the microarchitectural, cellular, and biomechanical characteristics of irradiated vertebral bodies. Correlation between radiologic measurements and biomechanical properties supported the reliability of this animal model of radiation-induced vertebral compression fracture, a finding that can be applied to future studies of preventative measures.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Fractures, Compression/etiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Male , Rabbits , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Vertebral Body/radiation effects
3.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(6): 487-493, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025097

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) as measured in planning computed tomographies (CTs) by a new method is a risk factor for pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for cervical cancer. METHODS: 62 patients with cervical cancer who received definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. The PIF were detected on follow-up magntic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI of the PIF patients was registered to the planning CT and the PIF contoured. On the contralateral side of the fracture, a mirrored structure of the fracture was generated (mPIF). For the whole sacral bone, three lumbar vertebrae, the first and second sacral vertebrae, and the PIF, we analyzed the BMD (mg/cm3), V50Gy, Dmean, and Dmax. RESULTS: Out of 62 patients, 6 (9.7%) had a fracture. Two out of the 6 patients had a bilateral fracture with only one of them being symptomatic. PIF patients showed a significantly lower BMD in the sacral and the lumbar vertebrae (p < 0.05). The BMD of the contoured PIF, however, when comparing to the mPIF, did not reach significance (p < 0.49). The difference of the V50Gy of the sacrum in the PIF group compared to the other (OTH) patients, i.e. those without PIF, did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: The dose does not seem to have a relevant impact on the incidence of PIF in our patients. One of the predisposing factors for developing PIF after radiotherapy seems to be the low BMD. We presented an easy method to assess the BMD in planning CTs.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Fractures, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Pelvic Bones/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Sacrum/radiation effects , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Susceptibility , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Fractures, Spontaneous/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Lumbar Vertebrae/chemistry , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Lymphatic Irradiation/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Minerals/analysis , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Sacrum/chemistry , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Sacrum/injuries , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 7, 2020 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901230

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication that occurs after radiotherapy for head or neck malignancies. ORN of the spine is rare, with only few cases affecting the cervical spine reported to date. To our knowledge, no case of lumbar ORN has been reported. We report a rare case of ORN in the lumbar spine that occurred 2 years after radiotherapy and perform a literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of lumbar ORN that occurred 2 years after radiotherapy for gallbladder carcinoma. The patient was successfully treated conservatively and followed up for > 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: ORN of the spine is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Spinal ORN is clinically described as a chronic disease with a slow onset. The most common presenting symptom of spinal ORN is pain. However, as ORN progresses, spinal kyphosis and instability can lead to neurological compression and thus to induced myelopathy or radiculopathy. Treatment of spinal ORN is comprehensive, including orthosis, medication, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, surgery, and new treatment combinations of pentoxifylline and tocopherol. The surgical rate for spinal ORN is relatively high.


Subject(s)
Gallbladder Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Osteoradionecrosis/etiology , Spinal Diseases/etiology , Female , Gallbladder Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Osteoradionecrosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoradionecrosis/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Spinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 48(1): 157-168, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359266

ABSTRACT

A moderate radiation dose, in vivo µCT scanning protocol was developed and validated for long-term monitoring of multiple skeletal sites (femur, tibia, vertebra) in mice. A customized, 3D printed mouse holder was designed and utilized to minimize error associated with animal repositioning, resulting in good to excellent reproducibility in most cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture and density parameters except for connectivity density. Repeated in vivo µCT scans of mice were performed at the right distal femur and the 4th lumbar vertebra every 3 weeks until euthanized at 9 weeks after the baseline scan. Comparing to the non-radiated counterparts, no radiation effect was found on trabecular bone volume fraction, osteoblast and osteoblast number/surface, or bone formation rate at any skeletal site. However, trabecular number, thickness, and separation, and structure model index were sensitive to ionizing radiation associated with the µCT scans, resulting in subtle but significant changes over multiple scans. Although the extent of radiation damage on most trabecular bone microarchitecture measures are comparable or far less than the age-related changes during the monitoring period, additional considerations need to be taken to minimize the confounding radiation factors when designing experiments using in vivo µCT imaging for long-term monitoring of mouse bone.


Subject(s)
Femur/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , X-Ray Microtomography , Animals , Female , Femur/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Reproducibility of Results , Tibia/radiation effects
6.
Spine Deform ; 7(6): 937-944, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732005

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical case series. OBJECTIVE: To assess objective outcomes of surgical correction of post-external beam radiation therapy (ERBT) kyphosis in a series of five adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: EBRT is a well-established treatment for many cancers in children and adults. One complication associated with EBRT is postirradiation spine deformity. Scoliosis is the most common deformity, but kyphosis also occurs frequently. Differences in deformity patterns are likely related to the location and intensity of radiation. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed treatment of these deformities in adults, and the most recent case series (of children) was published in 2005. METHODS: We present a series of five adults who underwent surgery for postirradiation kyphosis, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range, 2.5-6.2 years). RESULTS: Surgery improved the kyphotic deformity in all patients. Overall mean kyphotic deformity correction was 56° and was larger for cervical/cervicothoracic deformities (mean, 76°) than for lumbar deformities (mean, 42°) at midterm follow-up. Patients reported significant improvements in pain and self-image. Consistent with prior case series of children, we observed a high rate of complications (mean, 1.4 complications per patient) in adults. Three patients each underwent an unplanned surgical procedure because of a complication. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of postirradiation kyphotic spinal deformity is challenging, with common postoperative complications such as infection, instrumentation failure, and pseudarthrosis. However, with modern surgical techniques and spinal instrumentation, excellent deformity correction can be achieved and maintained. We recommend performing a two-stage procedure for cervicothoracic deformity, with anterior release followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation. In thoracolumbar deformities, correction can be achieved through single-stage posterior fusion. Rigid spinopelvic fixation with sacral-alar-iliac screws and second-stage anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1 is recommended to reduce nonunion risk. Cement augmentation of proximal and distal anchors can help prevent junctional failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Subject(s)
Kyphosis/etiology , Kyphosis/surgery , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Scoliosis/etiology , Aftercare , Cementation/methods , Female , Humans , Infections/etiology , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Lordosis/diagnostic imaging , Lordosis/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pedicle Screws/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , Pseudarthrosis/etiology , Radiography/methods , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/surgery , Self Concept , Spinal Curvatures/classification , Spinal Curvatures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/trends , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment Outcome
7.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 187(3): 327-337, 2019 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31589322

ABSTRACT

In this study, risk of exposure to adult patients in some common radiological procedures was estimated at selected diagnostic centers in Lagos State, Nigeria using estimated average effective doses. The results showed that pelvis lateral (LAT) examination with the lowest estimated mean effective dose level (2.61) recorded the highest probability of cancer incidence and mortality occurrences, while lumbar anteroposterior (AP) had the lowest (3.61). A high sum total of probability of fatal cancers and the total weighted probability of non-fatal cancer in a single exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation were recorded in pelvic procedure among others. Also, a high-percentage mortality increase of solid cancers was recorded in chest PA examination (53.7%), while the lowest was in lumbar spine radiography (with lumbar AP = 0.14%, lumbar LAT = 0.15%). The data obtained suggested the possibility of having higher percentage mortality and cancer-related incidence in the chest.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Pelvis/radiation effects , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiography, Thoracic/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/pathology , Nigeria/epidemiology , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , X-Rays , Young Adult
8.
Cancer Radiother ; 23(5): 408-415, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331841

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is a treatment method performed using ionizing radiation on cancer patients either alone or with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Although modern radiotherapy techniques provide a significant advantage in protecting healthy tissues, it is inevitable that normal tissues are also located in the areas targeted by radiations. In this study, we aimed to examine the bone mineral density changes in bone structures commonly included in the irradiated area such as, L5 vertebra, sacrum, and femur heads, in patients who have received pelvic radiotherapy; and the relationship between these changes with radiation dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients included in the study had been previously diagnosed with rectal cancer, which were operated or not. Preoperative or postoperative pelvic radiotherapy was planned for all patients. In terms of convenience when comparing with future scans, all densitometry and CT scans were performed with the same devices. Fifteen patients were included in the study. In order to determine the dose of radiation each identified area had taken after radiotherapy, the sacrum, L5 vertebra, bilateral femoral heads, and L1 regions were contoured in the CT scans in which treatment planning was done. Sagittal cross-sectional images were taken advantage of while these regions were being contoured. RESULTS: Bone mineral density was evaluated with CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after the treatment. The regions that have theoretically been exposed to irradiation, such as L5, sacrum, left to right femur were found to have significant difference in terms of bone density. According to CT evaluation, there was a significant decrease in bone intensity of L5, sacrum, left and right femurs. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment revealed that the whole of the left femoral head, left femur neck and Ward's region were significantly affected by radiotherapy. However, there was no significant difference in the sacrum and L5 vertebra before and after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: More accurate results could be achieved if the same study was conducted on a larger patient population, with a longer follow-up period. When the reduction in bone density is at maximum or a cure is likely in a long-term period, bone mineral density could be determined by measurements performed at regular intervals.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Femur Head/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sacrum/radiation effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adult , Aged , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/diagnostic imaging , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Femur Head/diagnostic imaging , Femur Head/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Male , Organs at Risk/diagnostic imaging , Organs at Risk/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Sacrum/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Eur Radiol ; 29(10): 5264-5271, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the variability of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) according to the methods used for computing collected data. METHODS: Dose-length products (DLP) were collected by our national nuclear control agency from the 250 devices installed in 140 medical centers in the country. In 2015, the number of head, thorax, abdomen, and lumbar spine examinations collected in these centers ranged from approximately 20,000 to 42,000. The impact on DRLs of the number of devices considered, as well as the differences in descriptive statistics (mean vs. median DLP) or methods of pooling DLP data (all devices vs. all patients), was investigated. Variability in DRLs was investigated using a bootstrapping method as a function of the numbers of devices and examinations per device. RESULTS: As expected, DRLs derived from means were higher than those from medians, with substantial differences between device- and patient-related DRLs. Depending on the numbers of devices and DLP data per device, the variability ranged from 10 to 40% but was stabilized at a level of 10-20% if the number of devices was higher than 50 to 60, regardless of the number of DLP data per device. CONCLUSION: Number of devices and of DLP data per device, descriptive statistics, and pooling data influence DRLs. As differences in methods of computing survey data can artificially influence DRLs, harmonization among national authorities should be recommended. KEY POINTS: • Due to CT dose variability, that of DRLs is at least of 10%. • DRLs derived from medians are lower than from means and differ from those obtained by pooling all patient data. • Fifty to 60 devices should be sufficient for estimating national DRLs, regardless of the number of data collected per device.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/radiation effects , Head/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Thorax/radiation effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Biometry , Europe , Humans , Physical Examination , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Eur J Radiol ; 113: 135-139, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927937

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation and updating of Austrian National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). METHODS: A nationwide survey on common conventional radiography and fluoroscopy examinations was conducted. In line with Austrian radiation protection standards, all relevant Austrian hospitals and radiology offices/centers were asked to report a minimum sample of 10 representative dose-area product (DAP) values together with patient weight and fluoroscopy time, if applicable. Examinations included for conventional radiography were skull, chest, abdomen, pelvis, lumbar spine and bedside chest x-ray, for fluoroscopy barium enema (single and double contrast) and swallowing (video). Participants were invited via e-mail, followed up by reminders to increase participation rates. Plausibility checks were performed to increase data quality. 3rd quartiles of facility median and mean DAP were calculated and compared to Austrian and international NDRLs. RESULTS: 59% of invited facilities submitted DAP data, 43% submitted additional data on patient weight and 41% on fluoroscopy time. DAP case numbers varied from 1005 to 2121 for conventional radiography and from 182 to 1380 for fluoroscopy. Average patient weight was 75 kg for conventional radiography and 77 kg for fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: 3rd quartiles derived from the survey are substantially lower than the old Austrian NDRLs (valid till early 2018). Since 3rd quartiles correspond well to European NDRLs, the update would be in accordance with European DRL harmonisation efforts.


Subject(s)
Radiography/standards , Austria , Body Weight/physiology , Data Accuracy , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Pelvis/radiation effects , Physical Examination/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiology , Reference Values , Skull/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thorax/radiation effects
11.
Eur Radiol ; 29(10): 5307-5313, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30877467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the variabilities of dose-area-products (DAP) of frequent X-ray examinations collected for comparison with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). METHODS: DAP values of chest, abdomen, and lumbar spine examinations obtained on devices from two manufacturers were collected in three centers over 1 to 2 years. The variability of the average DAP results defined as the 95% confidence interval in percentage of their median value was calculated for increasing sample sizes, each examination and center. We computed the sample sizes yielding variabilities lower or equal to 25% and 10%. The effect of narrowing patient selection based on body weight was also investigated (ranges of 67-73 Kg, or 60-80 Kg). RESULTS: DAP variabilities ranged from 75 to 170% of the median value when collecting small samples (10 to 20 DAP). To reduce this variability, larger samples are needed, collected over up to 2 years, regardless of the examination and center. A variability ≤ 10% could only be reached for chest X-rays, requiring up to 800 data. For the abdomen and lumbar spine, the lowest achievable variability was 25%, regardless of the body weight selection, requiring up to 400 data. CONCLUSION: Variabilities in DAP collected through small samples of ten data as recommended by authorities are very high, but can be reduced down to 25% (abdomen and lumbar spine) or even 10% (chest) through a substantial increase in sample sizes. Our findings could assist radiologists and regulatory authorities in estimating the reliability of the data obtained when performing X-ray dose surveys. KEY POINTS: • Low but reasonable variabilities cannot be reached with samples sized as recommended by regulatory authorities. Higher numbers of DAP values are required to reduce the variability. • Variabilities of 10% for the chest and 25% for abdomen and lumbar spine examinations are achievable, provided large samples of data are collected over 1 year. • Our results could help radiologists and authorities interpret X-rays dose surveys.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Thorax/radiation effects , Algorithms , Body Weight , Humans , Physical Examination/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sample Size , Surveys and Questionnaires , X-Rays
12.
Injury ; 50(4): 859-863, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922663

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: The intraoperative fluoroscopy has been widely used in modern neuro-spinal surgery due to the overwhelming trend toward minimal-access surgery. However, both patients and surgical personnel were under ionizing-radiation exposure during fluoroscopy usage. Since the fluoroscopy constitutes the vast majority of radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, the development and improvement of new interventional possibilities are of great importance and interests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients were included in the current study, who received thoracic-spinal tumor resection via posterior midline approach. In comparison to the conventional C-Arm mobile fluoroscopy machine, the Surgical Approach Visualization and Navigation (SAVN) System was used to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing radiation. RESULTS: The pain intensity and Japanese Orthopedic Association Score were equally ameliorated in patients of two groups. However, compared to C-arm group, the SAVN significantly reduced the screening time from 26.8 + 12.4 to 17.1 + 9.2 s (36.2% radiation reduction, P < 0.05), which was mainly due to the significant reduction of radiation attempts (from 12.8 + 4.9 to 7.1 + 5.5 times, P < 0.05). For patients, the direct and scatter radiation dose dropped 30.4% (P < 0.05) in the surgical region and 47.6% (P < 0.01) in the non-surgical region by using the SAVN System. Additionally, the tumor diameter/skin incision ratio increased from 0.39 + 0.4 to 0.47+ 0.28 after SAVN usage. Meanwhile, thedosimeter showed that the radiation dose to the primary surgeon was also lower in the SAVN group (72.1% reduction, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Comparing the conventional C-arm, the SAVN System based thoracic-spinal surgery significantly lowered radiation duration and dosage application towards both surgeons and patients.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted
13.
J Clin Neurosci ; 62: 264-268, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655237

ABSTRACT

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a useful modality for treatment of primary spinal sarcoma, but osteonecrosis after CIRT may cause pseudoarthrosis that can make subsequent reconstruction surgery difficult. The patients were a 68-year-old man (case 1), a 30-year-old woman (case 2), and a 49-year-old man (case 3) with lumbar lesions. After CIRT, cases 1 and 3 were treated with instrumented spondylectomy and case 2 underwent posterior decompression and instrumentation surgery. Cases 1 and 2 required several salvage procedures because of failure of instrumentation (rod breakage) before bone union was achieved. After multiple revision surgeries, these cases did achieve bone union without tumor recurrence. In contrast, in case 3, only spondylectomy using a pedicle screw system at 20 months after CIRT was required for fusion. At follow-up 11 years postoperatively, CT showed bone union with invasion of autograft bone from the iliac crest into adjacent vertebra. Collapse or a finding of viable tumor cells after CIRT requires surgery such as spondylectomy with reconstruction. Instrumented fixation following CIRT for a lumbar primary tumor should be performed with multilevel anterior support using a sufficient amount of bone graft in posterior fusion levels.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Heavy Ion Radiotherapy , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 184(1): 12-27, 2019 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30289498

ABSTRACT

A local survey was conducted, to evaluate the radiation dose to adult patients who underwent diagnostic X-ray examinations. Patient-related and technical data were recorded, in 1504 patients, for each of the 11 individual projections, of the 7 most common examinations performed in an X-ray room, with 1 digital radiography system. The patient entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) and the effective dose (ED) were calculated based on the X-ray tube output and the exposure parameters, as well as utilisation of suitable conversion coefficients, respectively. The 75th percentiles of the distribution of the ESAK and kerma area product (KAP) values were also established. The mean, median and 75th percentiles were compared with the national reference levels and the most common values reported at the European level through the DOSE DATAMED II project. The corresponding ED values were also compared with the average values reported for all European countries. The mean ESAK, KAP and ED values along with the uncertainty U values for chest PA, chest LAT, cranium AP, cranium LAT, cervical spine AP, cervical spine LAT, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP, abdomen AP, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) AP were 0.12 (0.001) mGy, 0.66 (0.023) mGy, 1.01 (0.034) mGy, 0.69 (0.098) mGy, 0.72 (0.014) mGy, 0.63 (0.011) mGy, 4.12 (0.050) mGy, 5.74 (0.082) mGy, 2.57 (0.024) mGy, 1.94 (0.017) mGy, 2.47 (0.073) mGy, and 0.09 (0.001) Gy cm2, 0.38 (0.012) Gy cm2, 0.32 (0.009) Gy cm2, 0.27 (0.052) Gy cm2, 0.17 (0.004) Gy cm2, 0.21 (0.006) Gy cm2, 1.18 (0.018) Gy cm2, 1.86 (0.023) Gy cm2, 1.41 (0.012) Gy cm2, 1.27 (0.010) Gy cm2, 1.28 (0.038) Gy cm2, as well as 0.01 (0.0001) mSv, 0.05 (0.0016) mSv, 0.02 (0.0006) mSv, 0.01 (0.0012) mSv, 0.03 (0.0008) mSv, 0.03 (0.0006) mSv, 0.26 (0.0038) mSv, 0.17 (0.0022) mSv, 0.20 (0.0016) mSv, 0.23 (0.0018) mSv, 0.23 (0.0068) mSv, respectively. The 75th percentiles along with the uncertainty U values for chest PA, chest LAT, cranium AP, cranium LAT, cervical spine AP, cervical spine LAT, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP, abdomen AP, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) AP were 0.14 (0.006) mGy, 0.88 (0.031) mGy, 1.22 (0.049) mGy, 0.94 (0.098) mGy, 0.93 (0.027) mGy, 0.78 (0.013) mGy, 5.16 (0.073) mGy, 7.24 (0.134) mGy, 2.96 (0.047) mGy, 2.59 (0.036) mGy, 3.07 (0.116) mGy, as well as 0.10 (0.0006) Gy cm2, 0.51 (0.017) Gy cm2, 0.37 (0.020) Gy cm2, 0.33 (0.040) Gy cm2, 0.23 (0.007) Gy cm2, 0.26 (0.011) Gy cm2, 1.50 (0.036) Gy cm2, 2.26 (0.035) Gy cm2, 1.61 (0.023) Gy cm2, 1.67 (0.017) Gy cm2, 1.56 (0.069) Gy cm2, in terms of ESAK and KAP values, respectively. The results were significantly lower compared with the national reference levels, the most common DRL values reported at the European level and other previously reported dose values. Patient dose surveys could contribute towards optimising radiation protection for patients, therefore, highlighting the necessity to increase the awareness and knowledge of the radiation dose in conjunction with the required image quality.


Subject(s)
Physical Examination/standards , Quality Control , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Radiography/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Young Adult
15.
World Neurosurg ; 118: e43-e51, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29959078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a method of accurately measuring the equivalent dose received by radiation-sensitive organs using the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and to provide reference values for future studies associated with radiation protection in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries. METHODS: After careful selection and preparation, TLD chips were used to obtain measurements from the eyes, thyroid glands, breasts, and gonads of 20 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries. The results were obtained via air kerma conversion-related calculations. RESULTS: The overall radiation exposures absorbed perioperatively by the eyes, thyroid glands, right breasts, left breasts, right ovaries, left ovaries, and testes were 0.41 ± 0.13, 1.43 ± 0.45, 6.95 ± 3.63, 9.50 ± 6.14, 29.86 ± 28.62, 23.47 ± 22.10, and 5.41 ± 1.86 mSv, respectively. A single computed tomography (CT) scan contributed to more than 75% of the overall dose received regardless of the position used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients received significantly higher radiation doses from CT scans than from regular digital radiograph examinations. These radiation doses were concentrated in the regional area of scanning. Our results indicate the necessity and benefits of radiation protection measures, especially for the organs researched herein, when patients undergoing lumbar surgeries require radiographic diagnostic examinations.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Perioperative Care/methods , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Dosimeters/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
16.
Radiat Res ; 190(1): 63-71, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29738279

ABSTRACT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with an increased risk of vertebral compression fracture. While bone is typically considered radiation resistant, fractures frequently occur within the first year of SBRT. The goal of this work was to determine if rapid deterioration of bone occurs in vertebrae after irradiation. Sixteen male rhesus macaque non-human primates (NHPs) were analyzed after whole-chest irradiation to a midplane dose of 10 Gy. Ages at the time of exposure varied from 45-134 months. Computed tomography (CT) scans were taken 2 months prior to irradiation and 2, 4, 6 and 8 months postirradiation for all animals. Bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical thickness were calculated longitudinally for thoracic (T) 9, lumbar (L) 2 and L4 vertebral bodies; gross morphology and histopathology were assessed per vertebra. Greater mortality (related to pulmonary toxicity) was noted in NHPs <50 months at time of exposure versus NHPs >50 months ( P = 0.03). Animals older than 50 months at time of exposure lost cortical thickness in T9 by 2 months postirradiation ( P = 0.0009), which persisted to 8 months. In contrast, no loss of cortical thickness was observed in vertebrae out-of-field (L2 and L4). Loss of BMD was observed by 4 months postirradiation for T9, and 6 months postirradiation for L2 and L4 ( P < 0.01). For NHPs younger than 50 months at time of exposure, both cortical thickness and BMD decreased in T9, L2 and L4 by 2 months postirradiation ( P < 0.05). Regions that exhibited the greatest degree of cortical thinning as determined from CT scans also exhibited increased porosity histologically. Rapid loss of cortical thickness was observed after high-dose chest irradiation in NHPs. Younger age at time of exposure was associated with increased pneumonitis-related mortality, as well as greater loss of both BMD and cortical thickness at both in- and out-of-field vertebrae. Older NHPs exhibited rapid loss of BMD and cortical thickness from in-field vertebrae, but only loss of BMD in out-of-field vertebrae. Bone is sensitive to high-dose radiation, and rapid loss of bone structure and density increases the risk of fractures.


Subject(s)
Cortical Bone/anatomy & histology , Cortical Bone/radiation effects , Animals , Bone Density/radiation effects , Cortical Bone/diagnostic imaging , Cortical Bone/physiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Macaca mulatta , Male , Organ Size/radiation effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/physiology , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
17.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 101(3): 550-557, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680256

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of dose sculpting intensity modulated radiation therapy on vertebral body growth in children with neuroblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2000 to 2011, 88 children with neuroblastoma underwent radiation at the authors' institution. Children with paravertebral tumors with at least 3 years of evaluable posttreatment imaging were included, and children who underwent spine reirradiation before follow-up were excluded. If vertebral bodies could not be spared, these "target" vertebral bodies were treated to at least 18 Gy. Thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were assessed separately. Dose data for target, spared, and internal control vertebral bodies were extracted. Multivariate generalized estimating equation modeling was used to assess the effect of dose and other clinical factors on vertebral body growth. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (20 boys, 14 girls) met study criteria. Median age at start of radiation was 4.3 years; all but 1 had prior high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Mean growth rates of target, spared, and control vertebral bodies (cm/body/y) were, respectively, 0.027, 0.032, and 0.044 in thoracic spine and 0.033, 0.055, and 0.083 in lumbar spine. On multivariate generalized estimating equation analysis, higher dose, older treatment age, male gender, and thoracic spine location were significantly associated with decreased vertebral body growth (P<.0001, P<.0001, P=.007, and P<.0001, respectively). Dose and spine location were significant in a 3-way interaction model (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral bodies spared by intensity modulated radiation therapy grew faster than target vertebrae. Regardless of intent to spare or target, multivariate analysis confirms that lower dose results in significantly increased growth rate. This technique should be investigated prospectively.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Neuroblastoma/radiotherapy , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Radiotherapy Dosage , Risk
18.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 181(4): 418-422, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566224

ABSTRACT

Patients undergoing dual energy X-ray absorption (DEXA) scans are exposed to small doses of ionizing radiation. Few papers have been published on the effective dose and organ dose for patients undergoing such scans on newer DEXA scanners. PCXMC 2.0 was used to calculate adult patient dose arising from DEXA scans. PCXMC 2.0 calculations were compared to published data and a discrepancy was noted for organ dose. Following this, effective and organ dose were measured on an anthropomorphic phantom using TLDs as a second comparison. The mean dose from 50 scans (minus background radiation) was measured. The dose calculated from PCXMC 2.0 compared to published data shows very good agreement for effective dose but a difference for organ dose. Our TLD data and PCXMC 2.0 data for organ dose have a closer agreement, within 20%. We are confident in using PCXMC 2.0 to calculate adult patient effective and organ dose arising from DEXA scans.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Software , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging
19.
Phys Med ; 45: 25-34, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29472087

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide a 3D dosimetric evaluation of a commercial portal dosimetry system using 2D/3D detectors under ideal conditions using VMAT. METHODS: A 2D ion chamber array, radiochromic film and gel dosimeter were utilised to provide a dosimetric evaluation of transit phantom and pre-treatment 'fluence' EPID back-projected dose distributions for a standard VMAT plan. In-house 2D and 3D gamma methods compared pass statistics relative to each dosimeter and TPS dose distributions. RESULTS: Fluence mode and transit EPID dose distributions back-projected onto phantom geometry produced 2D gamma pass rates in excess of 97% relative to other tested detectors and exported TPS dose planes when a 3%, 3 mm global gamma criterion was applied. Use of a gel dosimeter within a glass vial allowed comparison of measured 3D dose distributions versus EPID 3D dose and TPS calculated distributions. 3D gamma comparisons between modalities at 3%, 3 mm gave pass rates in excess of 92%. Use of fluence mode was indicative of transit results under ideal conditions with slightly reduced dose definition. CONCLUSIONS: 3D EPID back projected dose distributions were validated against detectors in both 2D and 3D. Cross validation of transit dose delivered to a patient is limited due to reasons of practicality and the tests presented are recommended as a guideline for 3D EPID dosimetry commissioning; allowing direct comparison between detector, TPS, fluence and transit modes. The results indicate achievable gamma scores for a complex VMAT plan in a homogenous phantom geometry and contributes to growing experience of 3D EPID dosimetry.


Subject(s)
Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
20.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 28(4): 579-583, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396814

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The O-arm® navigation system allows intraoperative CT imaging that can facilitate highly accurate instrumentation surgery, but radiation exposure is higher than with X-ray radiography. This is a particular concern in pediatric surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine intraoperative radiation exposure in pediatric spinal scoliosis surgery using O-arm. METHODS: The subjects were 38 consecutive patients (mean age 12.9 years, range 10-17) with scoliosis who underwent spinal surgery with posterior instrumentation using O-arm. The mean number of fused vertebral levels was 11.0 (6-15). O-arm was performed before and after screw insertion, using an original protocol for the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine doses. RESULTS: The average scanning range was 6.9 (5-9) intervertebral levels per scan, with 2-7 scans per patient (mean 4.0 scans). Using O-arm, the dose per scan was 92.5 (44-130) mGy, and the mean total dose was 401 (170-826) mGy. This dose was 80.2% of the mean preoperative CT dose of 460 (231-736) mGy (P = 0.11). The total exposure dose and number of scans using intraoperative O-arm correlated strongly and significantly with the number of fused levels; however, there was no correlation with the patient's height. CONCLUSIONS: As the fused range became wider, several scans were required for O-arm, and the total radiation exposure became roughly the same as that in preoperative CT. Use of O-arm in our original protocol can contribute to reduction in radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Radiation Exposure , Scoliosis/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adolescent , Bone Screws , Cervical Vertebrae/radiation effects , Child , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...