Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 58(12): 1342-1346, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167797

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The ziprasidone analogue lurasidone is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder for adults and children older than 10 years. Small studies and case reports suggest lurasidone overdose is not generally associated with major adverse effects, but no large sample has been published.Objective: To describe intentional lurasidone overdoses reported to poison centers.Methods: Retrospective analysis of single-substance intentional lurasidone ingestions from the National Poison Data System (NPDS) from 2011 to 2018.Results: There were 1753 single-substance intentional overdoses. Average age was 28.6 years (SD = 13.3 years) and 1199 (68.4%) of patients were female. Most cases (86.6%) were coded as suspected suicide. Regarding final management site, 1143 (65.2%) were discharged or admitted to psychiatric facilities; 328 (18.8%) were admitted, half of whom were admitted to critical care units (CCUs). Major effect was coded in 12 (0.7%), moderate effect in 259 (14.8%), minor effect in 531 (30%), and no effect in 614 (35%). There were no deaths. For cases for which dose information was available, there was not a statistically significant difference between median doses when analyzed by clinical effect. Most common adverse effects were drowsiness (449, 25.6%), tachycardia (254, 14.5%), vomiting (121, 6.9%), and hypertension (115, 6.6%). Most cases had either no therapy reported, or therapy was recommended by the poison center but confirmed not to have been administered (1010, 57.6%). Of the 164 patients admitted to CCUs, 80 (48.8%) received either no therapy or intravenous fluids alone.Discussion: These data suggest major effects are uncommon from lurasidone overdose. Despite a high rate of admission to CCUs, a substantial proportion received no critical therapies.Conclusions: This report demonstrates intentional lurasidone overdoses reported to poison centers generally have a favorable clinical course.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Drug Overdose/etiology , Drug Overdose/therapy , Lurasidone Hydrochloride/poisoning , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/poisoning , Child , Drug Overdose/mortality , Female , Humans , Lurasidone Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Poison Control Centers , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , United States , Young Adult
2.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 56(5): 355-359, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992737

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone are relatively new atypical antipsychotics. There is limited information on toxicity on pediatric exposures to these drugs. The objective of this study was to compare toxicity associated with asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone exposures in young children. METHODS: A retrospective study of U.S. National Poison Data System from 2010 to 2015 of single substance exposures to asenapine, iloperidone or lurasidone in children <6 years of age that were followed to known outcome was performed. RESULTS: There were 95 asenapine, 64 iloperidone and 124 lurasidone cases that met inclusion criteria. Reason was exploratory for 96% of cases. Drowsiness/lethargy occurred most frequently with iloperidone (45%) and least often with lurasidone (8%). Two iloperidone cases had respiratory depression. For asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone, respectively, management sites were on-site non-health care facility (non-HCF) (32%, 16%, 26%), treated/discharged from emergency department (ED) (46%, 47%, 63%), admitted to noncritical care (9%, 14%, 10%) and admitted to critical care (10%, 22%, 2%). Clinical effect duration was 8 h or less for the majority of non-HCF cases (80%) and for children treated/discharged from the ED (72%). For asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone, coded outcomes were no effect (50%, 41%, 81%), minor effect (43%, 39%, 17%), moderate (6%, 19%, 2%) and major (0, 2%, 0). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in children under 6 years of age, lurasidone exposures were least serious and iloperidone exposures were most serious based on clinical effects, management sites and coded outcomes. Observation of symptomatic children in the ED for 8 h should be sufficient to make triage decisions based on persistence or resolution of clinical effects.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/poisoning , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/poisoning , Isoxazoles/poisoning , Lurasidone Hydrochloride/poisoning , Piperidines/poisoning , Poison Control Centers/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Dibenzocycloheptenes , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...