Primary surgical prevention of lymphedema.

Lymphedema in the upper and lower extremities can lead to significant morbidity in patients, resulting in restricted joint movements, pain, discomfort, and reduced quality of life. While physiological lymphatic reconstructions such as lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), lymphovenous implantation (LVI), and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) have shown promise in improving patients' conditions, they only provide limited disease progression control or modest reversal. As lymphedema remains an incurable condition, the focus has shifted toward preventive measures in developed countries where most cases are iatrogenic due to cancer treatments. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) has been a particular concern, prompting the implementation of preventive measures like axillary reverse mapping. Similarly, techniques with lymph node-preserving concepts have been used to treat lower extremity lymphedema caused by gynecological cancers. Preventive lymphedema measures can be classified into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. In this comprehensive review, we will explore the principles and methodologies encompassing lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA), LVA, lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis (LLA), VLNT, and lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT). By evaluating the advantages and limitations of these techniques, we aim to equip surgeons with the necessary knowledge to effectively address patients at high risk of developing lymphedema.

Prevention, Surveillance, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: The Role of the Advanced Practice Provider.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a lifelong disease associated with decreased quality of life and increased healthcare costs. Evidence supports early detection and prompt treatment through prospective surveillance models.

[Preventive axillary lymphovenous anastomoses simultaneously with lymph node dissection in the treatment of breast cancer for prevention of lymphedema of the upper limb (LYMPHA technique)]. / Preventivnoe nalozhenie limfovenoznykh anastomozov v podmyshechnoi oblasti odnomomentno s limfaticheskoi dissektsiei pri lechenii raka molochnoi zhelezy dlya profilaktiki limfedemy verkhnei konechnosti (metodika LYMPHA).

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect the LYMPHA technique on the incidence of upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer after complete axillary lymph node dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 89 patients with breast cancer and signs of metastatic lesion of axillary lymph nodes who underwent complete axillary lymph dissection. In group 1 (41 patients), the LYMPHA technique was used simultaneously with lymph node dissection; in group 2 (48 patients) - lymph node dissection alone. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 1 year. The LYMPHA technique prolonged surgery and decreased duration of postoperative lymphorrhea. The incidence of upper limb lymphedema was 9.8% and 22.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LYMPHA technique was effective for prevention of upper limb lymphedema after complete axillary lymph node dissection in the treatment of breast cancer.

Lymphedema Surveillance and Prevention.

ABSTRACT: Lymphedema is a chronic condition, which can impact a person's quality of life and function. Identifying lymphedema at an early stage is key to preventing a person from developing chronic lymphedema. Physiatry can play an important role in education, identification of risk factors, performing prospective lymphedema surveillance programs, and prevention/treatment of lymphedema. Incorporating lymphedema surveillance programs into routine cancer care provides physiatry with the opportunity to assess additional rehabilitation and functional needs of a cancer patient.

A multidisciplinary approach to managing lymphorroea in primary lymphoedema: a case study.

This case study describes the successful management of a patient with primary lymphoedema, who was experiencing lymphorrhoea and epidermolysis, using a multidisciplinary approach. The patient had Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. The multidisciplinary team, in an outpatient clinic in Japan, included a certified lymphoedema therapist, plastic surgeons, and a wound, ostomy and continence nurse. The team performed complex physical therapy and lymphaticovenular anastomosis, which promoted the resolution of the lymphorrhoea. This resulted in improvements in skin condition, the prevention of recurrent cellulitis, and no increase in limb circumferences during the 1-year follow-up period. This report highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to lymphoedema management, including lymphorrhoea control that fitted in with the patient's daily life. It is hoped that this article will contribute to the improvement of the quality of life of patients with lymphoedema.

[Update of indications and techniques for the management of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery]. / Actualisation des indications et des techniques de prise en charge du lymphœdème après chirurgie du cancer du sein.

OBJECTIVES: Upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment is the leading cause of lymphedema in France. Despite improved surgical practices and de-escalation of radiotherapy, the risk of lymphedema after breast cancer still affects 5-20% of patients, with this variation depending on the measurement method used and the population studied. Lymphedema has a negative impact on quality of life and body image, and their possible occurrence remains a major concern for all women treated for breast cancer. The Sénologie Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) asked four specialists in breast surgery or lymphology to prepare a summary on the prevention, medical and surgical management of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and to discuss the medical and surgical innovations currently being evaluated. METHODS: This synthesis was based on national and international guidelines on the management of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and a recent review of the literature focusing on the years 2020-2023. RESULTS: From a preventive point of view, the restrictive instructions imposed for a long time (reduction in physical activity or the carrying of loads, air travel, exposure to the sun or cold, etc.) have altered patients' quality of life and should no longer be recommended. A good understanding of risk factors enables us to target preventive actions. Examples include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, axillary clearance, radiotherapy of the axillary fossa in addition to axillary clearance, total mastectomy, taxanes or anti-HER-2 therapies in the adjuvant phase. Resumption of physical activity, minimally invasive axillary surgery, de-escalation of radiotherapy and breast-conserving surgical procedures have all demonstrated their preventive value. When lymphedema does occur, early management, through complete decongestive physiotherapy, can help reduce its volume and prevent its long-term worsening. CONCLUSION: Surgical (lymph node transplants, lympho-vascular anastomoses) and medical (prolymphangiogenic growth factors) approaches to lymphedema treatment are numerous, but require long-term evaluation of their efficacy and adverse effects.

The Efficacy of Axillary Reverse Mapping for the Prevention of Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema (LE) is the most notable complication of axillary surgery. The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique was created to decrease LE. This study aims to evaluate a single surgeon's experience with ARM in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent SLNB or ALND. Tumor characteristics and treatments received were evaluated. Surgical intervention and use of ARM were compared to assess LE rates. A subgroup analysis was also performed of patients who underwent NAC. RESULTS: LE was initially reported in 7.1% (n = 10) of patients; 3.3% (n = 4) with SLNB and 35% (n = 6) with ALND. At initial follow-up, LE was reported 16.4% more often in patients who underwent ALND with no ARM, and 38.8% more often in patients who underwent ALND plus ARM. An increased risk of LE was found in patients treated with ALND (OR = 16.0, P < .001). All patients who underwent ARM were 12.75% more likely to develop LE if they received NAC (P < .05). Patients in the ALND group who also received NAC were more likely to undergo ARM as compared with patients in the SLNB group (P < .01). DISCUSSION: Our study showed that ARM failed to decrease the incidence of LE. Until better surgical outcomes are shown for the prevention of LE using ARM, other approaches should be utilized. However, larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate ARM.

Immediate-delayed lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymph nodes dissection for locally advanced breast cancer-related lymphedema prevention: Report of two cases.

Approximately 60%-70% of breast cancer patients in Indonesia are diagnosed in the locally advanced stage. The stage carries a higher risk of lymph node metastasis which increases susceptibility to lymph obstruction. Hence, breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) could present before axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The purpose of this case report is to describe immediate-delayed lymphatic reconstructions with lymphaticovenous anastomosis in two subclinical lymphedema cases that present before ALND. There were 51 and 58 years old breast cancer patients with stage IIIC and IIIB, respectively. Both had no arm lymphedema symptoms, but arm lymphatic vessel abnormalities were found during preoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. Mastectomy and ALND were performed and proceeded with lymphaticovenous anastomoses (LVA) in both cases. One LVA at the axilla (isotopic) was done in the first patient. On the second patient, 3 LVAs at the affected arm (ectopic) and 3 isotopic LVAs were created. The patients were discharged on the second day without complications during the follow-up. The intensity of dermal backflow was reduced, and no subclinical lymphedema progression occurred during 11 and 9 months follow-up, respectively. Based on these cases, BCRL screening might be recommended for the locally advanced stage before cancer treatment. Once diagnosed, immediate lymphatic reconstruction after ALND should be recommended to cure or prevent BCRL progression.

Establishment and Feasibility of an Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Program in a Community Health System.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant post-surgical complication of breast cancer treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has shown promise in preventing BCRL. While the primary literature supporting ILR comes from academic institutions, the majority of breast cancer care in the USA occurs in the community setting. This study evaluated a preventative lymphedema program performing ILR at a community health system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database including all patients who underwent ALND with concurrently attempted ILR from 2019 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The historical benchmark lymphedema rate was calculated through retrospective review of electronic medical records for all patients who underwent ALND without ILR from 2011 to 2021. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent ALND with ILR, of which ILR was successful in 69 (76.7%). ILR was more likely to be aborted in smokers (p < 0.05) and those with fewer lymphatic channels (p < 0.05) or a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.08). Patients with successful versus aborted ILR had lower lymphedema rates (10.9% versus 66.7%, p < 0.01) and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (8.7 versus 19.8, p = 0.25), and lower lymphedema rates than the historical benchmark (10.9% versus 50.2%, p < 0.01). Among patients with successful ILR, older patients were more likely to develop lymphedema (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Successful ILR after ALND significantly reduced the lymphedema rate when compared with patients with aborted ILR and our institution's historical benchmark. Our experience supports the efficacy of ILR and highlights the feasibility of ILR within a community health system.

Prophylactic lymphedema surgery in lower limb soft tissue sarcomas: A clinical paradigm in a promising field.

INTRODUCTION: Oncological treatments, such as radiotherapy and surgery, are high-risk factors for the development of secondary lymphedema in the upper and lower limbs, as well as the genitalia. Prophylactic lymphedema surgery (PLS) has previously demonstrated promising results in reducing secondary lymphedema in breast cancer and urogenital cancer patients. We conducted a study to adapt this principle for patients with lower-extremity sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria included patients with tumors on the medial aspect of the thigh and leg and tumor size larger than 5 cm. Group A (19 patients) comprised a prospective cohort (2020-2023) in which a PLS protocol was executed. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) was performed when lymphatic channels were interrupted due to tumor resection, intraoperatively verified by indocyanine green. Lymph node transfer was employed exclusively in cases involving preoperative radiotherapy and inguinal lymph node resection. Measurements were collected both preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Group B (26 patients) constituted a retrospective cohort (2017-2020) without PLS reconstruction, where the prevalence of lymphedema was determined. RESULTS: In total, we enrolled 45 patients with soft tissue sarcomas located on the inner aspect of the thigh and leg (26 in the control group vs. 19 in the prophylactic group). In the control group, lymphedema was observed in 10 out of 27 patients (37.04%). In the prophylactic group, two patients exhibited signs of lower-extremity lymphedema (2/19, 10.52%) with a median follow-up of 14.15 months (6 months-33months), demonstrating statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.02931). CONCLUSIONS: PLS for lower limb soft tissue sarcomas shows promising results, although it is premature to reach solid conclusions. Multicentre studies, standardization of criteria, larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up are imperative for further validation.

Prophylactic complex physiotherapy in gynecologic cancer survivors: patient-reported outcomes based on a lymphedema questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Lower extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer treatment impacts quality of life for gynecological cancer survivors. Complex decongestive physiotherapy is applied when lymphedema is diagnosed, but prophylactic physiotherapy is not yet a standard of care. The aim of this study is to evaluate prophylactic complex physiotherapy in patients with gynecological cancer and its effects on patient-reported symptoms based on the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire. METHODS: The data of patients diagnosed with gynecological cancers who underwent lymphadenectomy from July 2021 to June 2022 was evaluated. All patients were referred to the physiotherapy unit before adjuvant treatment. Patients who accepted prophylactic physiotherapy were informed and massage and exercise training were implemented, whereas patients who declined were solely informed. Bilateral lower extremity circumferences were measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months at the levels of 10 cm, 30 cm, and 50 cm above the heels. A translated form of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire was administered to all patients at the last visit. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Patients were diagnosed with endometrial (50%), ovarian (32%), cervical (16%), and vulvar (2%) cancer. Overall, 70% underwent systematic pelvic±para-aortic lymphadenectomy whereas sentinel lymph node mapping was performed in 30%. Lymphedema was seen in 5% (n=3) of the prophylactic physiotherapy positive group and in 60% (n=24) of the physiotherapy negative group. The median score was 3 (range 1-5) in the physiotherapy positive group and 16 (range 9-20) in the physiotherapy negative group. In patients diagnosed with lymphedema in the physiotherapy negative group, systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in 91.7% (n=22) and a higher number of lymph nodes was extracted (median 45.5; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic complex physiotherapy is associated with lower rates of lymphedema and better patient-reported symptom scores according to the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire.

Non-Linear Lymphatic Anatomy in Breast Cancer Patients Prior to Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Risk Factor For Lymphedema Development.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has become increasingly utilized for the prevention of breast cancer related lymphedema. Preoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is routinely performed prior to an ILR procedure to characterize baseline lymphatic anatomy of the upper extremity. While most patients have linear lymphatic channels visualized on ICG, representing a non-diseased state, some patients demonstrate non-linear patterns. This study aims to determine potential inciting factors that help explain why some patients have non-linear patterns, and what these patterns represent regarding the relative risk of developing postoperative breast cancer related lymphedema in this population. A retrospective review was conducted to identify breast cancer patients who underwent successful ILR with preoperative ICG at our institution from November 2017-June 2022. Among the 248 patients who were identified, 13 (5%) had preoperative non-linear lymphatic anatomy. A history of trauma or surgery of the affected limb and an increasing number of sentinel lymph nodes removed prior to ALND appeared to be risk factors for non-linear lymphatic anatomy. Furthermore, non-linear anatomy in the limb of interest was associated with an increased risk of postoperative lymphedema development. Overall, non-linear lymphatic anatomy on pre-operative ICG lymphography appears to be a risk factor for developing ipsilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema. Guided by the study's findings, when breast cancer patients present with baseline non-linear lymphatic anatomy, our institution has implemented a protocol of prophylactically prescribing compression sleeves immediately following ALND.

Effectiveness of physical exercise programmes in reducing complications associated with secondary lymphoedema to breast cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most underestimated and debilitating complications associated with the treatment that women with breast cancer receive. Several systematic reviews (SRs) of different physical exercise programmes have been published, presenting disperse and contradictory clinical results. Therefore, there is a need for access to the best available and summarised evidence to capture and evaluate all the physical exercise programmes that focus on reducing BCRL. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of different physical exercise programmes in reducing the volume of lymphoedema, pain intensity and improving quality of life. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of this overview is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols, and its methodology is based on Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Only those SRs involving physical exercise by patients with BCRL will be included, whether on its own or combined with other exercises or other physical therapy interventions.The outcomes of interest to be considered will be lymphoedema volume, quality of life, pain intensity, grip strength, range of motion, upper limb function and any adverse event. The MEDLINE/PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, PEDro and Embase databases will be searched for reports published from database inception to April 2023.Two researchers will perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Any discrepancy will be resolved by consensus, or ultimately, by a third-party reviewer. We will use Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this overview will be published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and the scientific dissemination will take place in national or international conferences. This study does not require approval from an ethics committee, as it does not directly collect information from patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022334433.

Exploring the potential role of health resort medicine in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a viable alternative for innovative rehabilitation opportunities?

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disorder of the lymphatic system that impairs the return of lymphatic fluid. Breast cancer treatment can cause breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), with axillary lymph node dissection and regional lymph node radiation being established risk factors. BCRL can cause severe morbidity, disability, and reduced quality of life. Early detection and treatment are essential to prevent the disease from progressing and causing complications. According to the International Society of Lymphology, complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is the most effective conservative treatment for lymphedema. Aquatic exercise is a safe and effective form of therapeutic CDT exercise that can improve joint range of motion, reduce pain, and positively impact limb volume. Additionally, health resort medicine and thermal mineral-rich waters may provide synergistic benefits for therapeutic exercise programs. Therefore, we believe that consideration should be given to whether the spa setting could represent a viable alternative for the rehabilitation of BCRL patients.