Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Biomark Med ; 14(15): 1439-1452, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33140661

ABSTRACT

Aim: Novel biomarkers that are able to accurately monitor tuberculosis (TB) treatment effectiveness are needed to adjust therapy and identify a need for a regimen change. Materials & methods: In our study, conducted on a cohort comprising 100 pulmonary TB patients, we analyzed the role of plasma cytokines and Toll-like receptors expression as biomarkers of treatment response. Results: Changes in toll-interacting protein (TOLLIP) and lymphocyte antigen 96 (LY96) gene expression as well as nine cytokine levels over the first 2 months were significantly associated with successful treatment outcome. Successful treatment was associated with higher serum concentration of Toll-like receptor-2. Conclusion: Our results suggest that differential expression of specific effector molecules and dynamics of selected cytokines may help to identify those responding to TB treatment early.


Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Adult , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/blood , Cohort Studies , Cytokines/blood , Female , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/analysis , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/blood , Longitudinal Studies , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/analysis , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/pathogenicity , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/blood , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/immunology
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 18(11)2017 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29099761

ABSTRACT

The interactions between sugar-containing molecules from the bacteria cell wall and pattern recognition receptors (PRR) on the plasma membrane or cytosol of specialized host cells are the first molecular events required for the activation of higher animal's immune response and inflammation. This review focuses on the role of carbohydrates of bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS, lipooligosaccharide, LOS, and lipid A), in the interaction with the host Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 (TLR4/MD-2) complex. The lipid chains and the phosphorylated disaccharide core of lipid A moiety are responsible for the TLR4 agonist action of LPS, and the specific interaction between MD-2, TLR4, and lipid A are key to the formation of the activated complex (TLR4/MD-2/LPS)2, which starts intracellular signalling leading to nuclear factors activation and to production of inflammatory cytokines. Subtle chemical variations in the lipid and sugar parts of lipid A cause dramatic changes in endotoxin activity and are also responsible for the switch from TLR4 agonism to antagonism. While the lipid A pharmacophore has been studied in detail and its structure-activity relationship is known, the contribution of core saccharides 3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonic acid (Kdo) and heptosyl-2-keto-3-deoxy-octulosonate (Hep) to TLR4/MD-2 binding and activation by LPS and LOS has been investigated less extensively. This review focuses on the role of lipid A, but also of Kdo and Hep sugars in LPS/TLR4 signalling.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/immunology , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Lipopolysaccharides/immunology , Signal Transduction , Toll-Like Receptor 4/immunology , Animals , Bacteria/chemistry , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Lipopolysaccharides/analysis , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/analysis , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/immunology , Models, Molecular , Toll-Like Receptor 4/analysis
3.
J Periodontal Res ; 49(6): 845-54, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24620831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated signaling in host cells involves Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) accessory molecules, including LPS-binding protein (LBP), cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) and lymphocyte antigen 96 (MD-2). However, expression of these innate defense molecules in various compartments of the human periodontium is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression profile of TLR4 in human gingiva. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human gingival biopsies were collected from healthy gingival or chronic periodontitis tissue. Primary gingival keratinocytes and fibroblasts were cultured. Immunohistochemical analysis for TLR4 was performed. Transcripts of TLR4, MD-2, CD14 and LBP, and their protein products, were examined using RT-PCR, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. The interactions between these molecules in keratinocytes and fibroblasts were investigated by co-immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: TLR4 immunoreactivity was found in healthy gingival epithelium and periodontitis tissue, and appeared to be lower in junctional epithelium ( p ≤ 0.01). Fibroblasts and inflammatory cells stained more strongly for TLR4 in diseased periodontal tissues (p < 0.001). Three TLR4 splicing variants, two MD-2 splicing variants and one CD14 mRNA were expressed by gingival keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Expression of TLR4, CD14 and MD-2 proteins was detected in keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. TLR4 protein from gingival keratinocytes and fibroblasts could be co-immunoprecipitated with CD14 or MD-2, suggesting an association between the related molecules in vivo. LBP transcript was detected in gingival biopsies, but not in primary cultures of gingival keratinocytes or fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: TLR4, CD14 and MD-2, but not LBP, are expressed in human gingival keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The TLR4 expression level in the junctional epithelium appeared to be lowest within the periodontal epithelial barrier.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/immunology , Gingiva/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/analysis , Acute-Phase Proteins/analysis , Adult , Alternative Splicing/genetics , Alveolar Bone Loss/classification , Carrier Proteins/analysis , Cells, Cultured , Chronic Periodontitis/classification , Epithelial Attachment/immunology , Epithelium/immunology , Exons/genetics , Female , Fibroblasts/immunology , Gingiva/pathology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Keratinocytes/immunology , Leukocytes/immunology , Lipopolysaccharide Receptors/analysis , Lipopolysaccharide Receptors/genetics , Lipopolysaccharides/immunology , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/analysis , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/genetics , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins/analysis , Middle Aged , Periodontal Attachment Loss/classification , Periodontal Pocket/classification , Periodontal Pocket/pathology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/genetics
4.
J Clin Periodontol ; 38(4): 318-25, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21284689

ABSTRACT

AIM: Because the absorption of stimulants of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 from the gastrointestinal tract into the circulation has been proposed to promote the development of atherosclerosis and insulin resistance, we aimed to quantify the abundance of stimulants of TLR2 and TLR4 in human saliva. METHODS: A recently developed bioassay based upon measurement of NF-κB activation in TLR-deficient human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells transfected with human TLR2 or TLR4 and calibrated with synthetic bacterial lipopeptide (Pam(3) CSK(4) ) or Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), was used to establish the normal range of TLR stimulants in saliva of 20 healthy subjects and 20 subjects with periodontal disease. RESULTS: Median soluble stimulants of TLR2 and TLR4 were significantly higher in saliva of periodontitis patients compared with saliva of healthy subjects; 3450 versus 77 ng/ml Pam(3) CSK(4) equivalents (p<0.0001) and 138 versus 7 ng/ml LPS equivalents, respectively (p<0.0001). Salivary TLR stimulant levels remained relatively stable in healthy subjects over several days. Six strains of oral Gram-negative bacteria, including Tannerella forsythensis, Lysobacter enzymogenes, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella oris and Porphyromonas gingivalis, from a panel of nine examined did not stimulate TLR4-dependent signalling. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated salivary TLR stimulants may represent a novel mechanism by which periodontitis increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease and insulin resistance.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/immunology , Saliva/chemistry , Salivary Proteins and Peptides/analysis , Toll-Like Receptor 2/analysis , Toll-Like Receptor 4/analysis , Adult , Bacteroides/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Cells, Cultured , Culture Media, Conditioned , Escherichia coli , Female , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Lipopeptides/analysis , Lipopolysaccharides/analysis , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/analysis , Lysobacter/immunology , Male , Porphyromonas gingivalis/immunology , Prevotella/immunology , Prevotella intermedia/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 5/analysis
5.
Reproduction ; 134(5): 683-93, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17965259

ABSTRACT

Oestrogens are pivotal in ovarian follicular growth, development and function, with fundamental roles in steroidogenesis, nurturing the oocyte and ovulation. Infections with bacteria such as Escherichia coli cause infertility in mammals at least in part by perturbing ovarian follicle function, characterised by suppression of oestradiol production. Ovarian follicle granulosa cells produce oestradiol by aromatisation of androstenedione from the theca cells, under the regulation of gonadotrophins such as FSH. Many of the effects of E. coli are mediated by its surface molecule lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding to the Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4), CD14, MD-2 receptor complex on immune cells, but immune cells are not present inside ovarian follicles. The present study tested the hypothesis that granulosa cells express the TLR4 complex and LPS directly perturbs their secretion of oestradiol. Granulosa cells from recruited or dominant follicles are exposed to LPS in vivo and when they were cultured in the absence of immune cell contamination in vitro they produced less oestradiol when challenged with LPS, although theca cell androstenedione production was unchanged. The suppression of oestradiol production by LPS was associated with down-regulation of transcripts for aromatase in granulosa cells, and did not affect cell survival. Furthermore, these cells expressed TLR4, CD14 and MD-2 transcripts throughout the key stages of follicle growth and development. It appears that granulosa cells have an immune capability to detect bacterial infection, which perturbs follicle steroidogenesis, and this is a likely mechanism by which ovarian follicle growth and function is perturbed during bacterial infection.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Surface/analysis , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/metabolism , Ovarian Follicle/immunology , Androstenedione/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Cells, Cultured , Female , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/analysis , Granulosa Cells/immunology , Lipopolysaccharide Receptors/analysis , Lipopolysaccharides/pharmacology , Lymphocyte Antigen 96/analysis , Nitric Oxide/analysis , Ovarian Follicle/metabolism , Radioimmunoassay , Theca Cells/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/analysis , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...