Development of EBV Related Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Deficiency of Adenosine Deaminase 2 with Uncontrolled EBV Infection.

Deficiency of Adenosine Deaminase 2 (DADA2) patients presenting with primary immunodeficiency are at risk of uncontrolled EBV infection and secondary malignancies including EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD). This paper describes the first case of EBV related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a patient with DADA2 and uncontrolled EBV infection. Consideration should be given to monitoring for EBV viraemia and to preventative EBV specific therapy in DADA2 and patients with at risk primary immunodeficiencies. A type I interferon (IFN) gene signature is associated with DADA2 though its association with immune dysregulation is unclear.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) require additional treatments, especially those not eligible or not responding to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Over the last few years, several new treatments have been developed and approved for these patients, among them of particular relevance are those targeting CD19. Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, composed of a modified fragment crystallizable (Fc) region engineered with higher affinity for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity through natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis). In this product review, we will discuss its mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy results from clinical trials that led to its approval in combination with lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation.

An anti-CD19/CTLA-4 switch improves efficacy and selectivity of CAR T cells targeting CD80/86-upregulated DLBCL.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy is a potent treatment for relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell lymphomas but provides lasting remissions in only ∼40% of patients and is associated with serious adverse events. We identify an upregulation of CD80 and/or CD86 in tumor tissue of (r/r) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with tisagenlecleucel. This finding leads to the development of the CAR/CCR (chimeric checkpoint receptor) design, which consists of a CD19-specific first-generation CAR co-expressed with a recombinant CTLA-4-linked receptor with a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. CAR/CCR T cells demonstrate superior efficacy in xenograft mouse models compared with CAR T cells, superior long-term activity, and superior selectivity in in vitro assays with non-malignant CD19+ cells. In addition, immunocompetent mice show an intact CD80-CD19+ B cell population after CAR/CCR T cell treatment. The results reveal the CAR/CCR design as a promising strategy for further translational study.

Three cases of late-onset post CAR-T therapy isolated CNS relapse in R/R large B-cell lymphoma.

CD19-chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has improved the outcomes of relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma significantly. However, about 50% of patients relapsed post-CAR-T therapy. Late relapse composed of 1/3 to 1/2 of CAR-T cell therapy failure, with no previous reports of isolated relapse in immune-privileged sites. Here, we report the first case series of late-onset post CAR-T cell therapy isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapses, in systemic relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma patients. With these cases, we suggest that additional CNS prophylaxis should be administrated for primary refractory patients on CAR-T cell therapy with previous neurological involvements, multiple extra-nodular lesions, and high CNS-IPI score pre-CAR, as well as early disappearance of circulating CAR-T cells post infusion.

Timing of anti-PD-L1 antibody initiation affects efficacy/toxicity of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: More than half of the patients treated with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) do not achieve durable remission, which may be partly due to PD-1/PD-L1-associated CAR T-cell dysfunction. We report data from a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02706405), in which adults with LBCL were treated with autologous CD19 CAR T cells (JCAR014) combined with escalating doses of the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, durvalumab, starting either before or after CAR T-cell infusion. The addition of durvalumab to JCAR014 was safe and not associated with increased autoimmune or immune effector cell-associated toxicities. Patients who started durvalumab before JCAR014 infusion had later onset and shorter duration of cytokine release syndrome and inferior efficacy, which was associated with slower accumulation of CAR T cells and lower concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in the blood. Initiation of durvalumab before JCAR014 infusion resulted in an early increase in soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) levels that coincided with the timing of maximal CAR T-cell accumulation in the blood. In vitro, sPD-L1 induced dose-dependent suppression of CAR T-cell effector function, which could contribute to inferior efficacy observed in patients who received durvalumab before JCAR014. Despite the lack of efficacy improvement and similar CAR T-cell kinetics early after infusion, ongoing durvalumab therapy after JCAR014 was associated with re-expansion of CAR T cells in the blood, late regression of CD19+ and CD19- tumors, and enhanced duration of response. Our results indicate that the timing of initiation of PD-L1 blockade is a key variable that affects outcomes after CD19 CAR T-cell immunotherapy for adults with LBCL.

A prospective observational study of real-world treatment and outcome in secondary CNS lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) confers a dismal prognosis and treatment advances are constrained by the lack of prospective studies and real-world treatment evidence. METHODS: Patients with SCNSL of all entities were included at first diagnosis and patient characteristics, treatment data, and outcomes were prospectively collected in the Secondary CNS Lymphoma Registry (SCNSL-R) (NCT05114330). FINDINGS: 279 patients from 47 institutions were enrolled from 2011 to 2022 and 243 patients (median age: 66 years; range: 23-86) were available for analysis. Of those, 49 (20 %) patients presented with synchronous (cohort I) and 194 (80 %) with metachronous SCNSL (cohort II). The predominant histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 68 %). Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of CNS involvement was 17·2 months (95 % CI 12-27·5), with longer OS in cohort I (60·6 months, 95 % CI 45·5-not estimable (NE)) than cohort II (11·4 months, 95 % CI 7·8-17·7, log-rank test p < 0.0001). Predominant induction regimens included R-CHOP/high-dose MTX (cohort I) and high-dose MTX/cytarabine (cohort II). Rituximab was used in 166 (68 %) of B-cell lymphoma. Undergoing consolidating high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) in partial response (PR) or better was associated with longer OS (HR adjusted 0·47 (95 % CI 0·25-0·89), p = 0·0197). INTERPRETATION: This study is the largest prospective cohort of SCNSL patients providing a comprehensive overview of an international real-world treatment landscape and outcomes. Prognosis was better in patients with SCNSL involvement at initial diagnosis (cohort I) and consolidating HDT-ASCT was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PR or better.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab or obinutuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a phase Ib/II study.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite treatment advances that have improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL, many patients still die from progressive disease or treatment-related toxicities. In the phase Ib/II GO29365 study (clinicaltrials.gov 02257567), the safety and efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) versus bendamustine and rituximab (BR) alone, and polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and obinutuzumab (Pola-BG) as a single-arm cohort were evaluated in patients with R/R FL. Following the phase Ib safety run-in, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Pola-BR or BR alone in the phase II stage; a separate non-randomized Pola-BG cohort was examined in the phase Ib/II expansion stage. Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability (phase Ib) and positron emission tomography complete response (PET-CR) rate by independent review committee (phase II). Overall, 112 patients were enrolled (phase Ib safety run-in: Pola-BR, N=6; phase II randomized cohort: Pola-BR, N=39; BR, N=41; phase Ib/II expansion cohort: Pola-BG, N=26). PET-CR rates were 66.7% (phase Ib safety run-in, Pola-BR); 69.2% (phase II randomized, Pola-BR); 63.4% (phase II randomized, BR); and 65.4% (phase Ib/II expansion Pola-BG). There was a higher occurrence of cytopenias with Pola-BR and Pola-BG than with BR; serious adverse events were more frequent with Pola-BR (61.4%) and Pola-BG (46.2%) than with BR (29.3%). Overall, this analysis does not demonstrate a benefit of adding Pola to BR or BG regimens for patients with R/R FL.

Rituximab with standard LMB chemotherapy in pediatric high-risk mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A report from the JPLSG B-NHL14 trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adding rituximab to standard lymphomes malins B (LMB) chemotherapy for children with high-risk mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) has previously been demonstrated in an international randomized phase III trial, to which the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group could not participate. METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with LMB chemotherapy in Japanese patients, we conducted a single-arm multicenter trial. RESULTS: In this study, 45 patients were enrolled between April 2016 and September 2018. A total of 33 (73.3%), 5 (11.1%), and 6 (13.3%) patients had Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and aggressive mature B-NHL, not otherwise specified, respectively. Ten (22.2%) and 21 (46.7%) patients had central nervous system disease and leukemic disease, respectively. The median follow-up period was 47.5 months. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 84.9-99.7) and 100%, respectively. The only event was relapse, which occurred in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Seven patients (15.6%) developed Grade 4 or higher non-hematologic adverse events. Febrile neutropenia was the most frequent Grade 3 or higher adverse event after the pre-phase treatment, with a frequency of 54.5%. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with LMB chemotherapy in children with high-risk mature B-NHL was observed in Japan.

Treatment of Monomorphic Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant: A Multicenter Review.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is the most common posttransplant malignancy in children. We reviewed data from 3 Canadian pediatric centers to determine patient characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes for children with monomorphic PTLD. There were 55 eligible children diagnosed between January 2001 to December 2021. Forty-eight patients (87.2%) had B-cell PTLD: Burkitt lymphoma (n = 25; 45.4%) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 23; 41.2%), the remainder had natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (n = 5; 9.1%), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1;1.8%), or other (n = 1;1.8%). Thirty-nine (82.1%) patients with B-cell PTLD were treated with rituximab and chemotherapy with or without a reduction in immunosuppression (reduced immune suppression). The chemotherapy used was primarily one of 2 regimens: Mature Lymphoma B-96 protocol in 22 patients (56.4%) and low-dose cyclophosphamide with prednisone in 14 patients (35%). Most patients with T/NK-cell lymphoma were treated with reduced immune suppression + chemotherapy (n = 4; 80%). For all patients with monomorphic PTLD, the projected 3-year event-free survival/3-year overall survival was 62% and 77%, respectively. Of the patients, 100% with T/NK-cell PTLD 100% progressed or relapsed and, subsequently, died of disease. For patients with B-cell PTLD, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two main chemotherapy regimens employed.

Hysterectomy, oophorectomy and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk for adverse health outcomes. However, its connection to the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains unclear. The aims of our study were to investigate the associations between hysterectomy, oophorectomy and risk of NHL and its major subtypes (eg, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]), and whether these associations were modified by exogenous hormone use. Postmenopausal women (n = 141,621) aged 50-79 years at enrollment (1993-1998) from the Women's Health Initiative were followed for an average of 17.2 years. Hysterectomy and oophorectomy were self-reported at baseline. Incident NHL cases were confirmed by central review of medical records and pathology reports. During the follow-up period, a total of 1719 women were diagnosed with NHL. Hysterectomy, regardless of oophorectomy status, was associated with an increased risk of NHL (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.44). Oophorectomy was not independently associated with NHL risk after adjusting for hysterectomy. When stratified by hormone use, the association between hysterectomy and NHL risk was confined to women who had never used hormone therapy (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.06-1.71), especially for DLBCL subtype (P for interaction = .01), and to those who had undergone hysterectomy before the age of 55. Our large prospective study showed that hysterectomy was a risk factor of NHL. Findings varied by hormone use. Future studies incorporating detailed information on the types and indications of hysterectomy may deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying DLBCL development and its potential interactions with hormone use.

Organ complications after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from the EBMT transplant complications and lymphoma working party.

We investigated ≥ grade 3 (CTC-AE) organ toxicities for commercial CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) products in 492 patients (Axi-Cel; n = 315; Tisa-Cel; n = 177) with Large B-cell Lymphoma in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) CAR-T registry. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 organ toxicities during the first 100 days after CAR-T was low and the most frequent were: renal (3.0%), cardiac (2.3%), gastro-intestinal (2.3%) and hepatic (1.8%). The majority occurred within three weeks after CAR-T cell therapy. Overall survival was 83.1% [79.8-86.5; 95% CI] at 3 months and 53.5% [49-58.4; 95% CI] at one year after CAR-T. The most frequent cause of death was tumour progression (85.1%). Non-relapse mortality was 3.1% [2.3-4.1; 95% CI] at 3 months and 5.2% [4.1-6.5; 95% CI] at one year after CAR-T. The most frequent causes of non-relapse mortality were cell-therapy-related toxicities including organ toxicities (6.4% of total deaths) and infections (4.4% of total deaths). Our data demonstrates good safety in the European real-world setting.

Novel agents in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), ineligible for or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplant or chimeric antigen-receptor T-cell therapies have poor outcomes. Several novel agents, polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, and selinexor, have been approved and offer new opportunities for this difficult to treat population. Studies are evaluating combination of these agents with chemotherapy and other emerging therapies. Additionally, advances in our understanding of DLBCL biology, genetics, and immune microenvironment have allowed for the identification of new therapeutic targets like Ikaros and Aiolos, IRAK4, MALT1, and CD47 with several agents in ongoing clinical trials. In this chapter we review updated data supporting the use of the approved agents and discuss other emerging novel therapies for patients with R/R DLBCL.

Long-term efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma achieving a complete response with pixantrone.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with refractory or multiply relapsed (R/R) disease is disappointing. Pixantrone is currently approved as third or fourth line regimen, with encouraging results, even if long-term follow-up data are limited. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of our observational study, we retrospectively investigated disease outcome and clinical characteristics of 16 R/R DLBCL patients who achieved a complete response with pixantrone. RESULTS: Pixantrone was administered as third or fourth line in 12/16 (75%) and 4/16 (25%) cases. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 14/16 patients (87.5%) were alive (causes of death were progressive disease and secondary acute myeloid leukemia, one case each). Median progression-free survival was 23.8 months, median duration of response was 17.8 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (2-years OS was 84%). A significant proportion of patients achieved a long-lasting response >12 months (7/16 cases). Response to prior therapy did not influence long-term remission after pixantrone. CONCLUSION: In this real-life experience, pixantrone demonstrated long-term efficacy in a cohort of R/R DLBCL cases who had previously received at least two prior regimens; many of whom had characteristics associated with poor prognosis.

Outcome of Brain Lymphoma in a High Epstein-Barr Virus-Prevalence Country After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in adult kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is less common in Taiwan. In our institute, we observed that brain lymphoma was the most notorious type. METHODS: The study describes the clinical, histologic, and radiological features of primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL) and the outcomes and associations with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in our center. RESULTS: Among 1470 KTx recipients, 5 patients had tissue-proven brain lymphoma (0.34%). The brain pathology disclosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in all patients. EBV was detected through in situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr encoding region (EBER) to disclose the EBV inclusion in the nuclei of lymphoma cells. The first treatment step was the reduction of immunosuppressants; 4 patients received whole-brain radiotherapy after complete resection of PCNSL, and 1 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Only one patient had poor performance status at the time of diagnosis and had a poor response to treatment with steroids. Four patients survived (mean 36.5 months, range 8.6 to 57.6 months), but one died after rapid neurologic deterioration. CONCLUSION: Epstein-Barr virus inclusion was found in PCNSL in our patients; however, the role of EBV in PCNSL remains to be clarified. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a rare malignancy after KTx with a predilection of brain involvement in Taiwan. We report a successful care experience in a patient with primary CNS lymphoma with better survival.

CAR T-cells and macrophages in large B-cell lymphoma: impact on toxicity and efficacy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 is the current standard of care for the treatment of relapsed refractory large B cell lymphoma, demonstrating impressive response rates in the second- and third-line setting. Despite these advances, this treatment strategy can result in significant toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome. While the exact mechanisms of these immune-mediated toxicities are not clearly understood, emerging pre-clinical and clinical studies have revealed the pivotal role of myeloid cells, particularly macrophages, as key contributors to the efficacy of treatments and as crucial mediators of toxicity. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how macrophages mediate these effects, highlighting specific mechanisms of macrophage biology relevant to CAR T-cell therapy activity and side effects. These findings are resulting in novel treatment strategies that target macrophages, and able to mitigate toxicity while preserving CAR T-cell therapy efficacy.

Central nervous system relapse in younger patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a LYSA and GLA/DSHNHL analysis.

Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with immunochemotherapy such as R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Patients with progression or relapse in the central nervous system (CNS) face dismal outcomes. The impact of more aggressive regimens used in frontline therapy has not been systematically investigated in this context. To this end, we analyzed a large cohort of 2203 younger patients with DLBCL treated on 10 German (German Lymphoma Alliance [GLA]/The German High Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group [DSHNHL]) and French (The Lymphoma Study Association [LYSA]) prospective phase 2 and 3 trials after first-line therapy with R-CHOP, R-CHOEP (R-CHOP + etoposide), dose-escalated R-CHOEP followed by repetitive stem cell transplantation (R-MegaCHOEP), or R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycine, and prednisone) followed by consolidation including multiple drugs crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Patients with DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 to 1 showed very low cumulative incidence rates of CNS relapse regardless of first-line therapy and CNS prophylaxis (3-year cumulative incidences 0%-1%). Younger high-risk patients with aaIPI of 2 to 3 had 3-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.6% and 4% after R-ACVBP plus consolidation or R-(Mega)CHO(E)P, respectively (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.8-7.4; P = .118). Thus, for younger high-risk patients, frontline regimens incorporating agents crossing the BBB may reduce often fatal CNS relapse.

Allogeneic transplant following CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) can potentially salvage large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients experiencing treatment failure after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T). Nonetheless, data on the efficacy and toxicities of alloHCT after receipt of CAR T are limited. We report a multicenter retrospective study assessing the safety, toxicities, and outcomes of alloHCT in LBCL patients following CAR T failure. Eighty-eight patients with relapsed, refractory LBCL received an alloHCT following anti-CD19 CAR T failure. The median number of lines of therapy between CAR T infusion and alloHCT was one (range, 0-7). Low intensity conditioning was used in 77% (n=68) and peripheral blood was the most common graft source (86%, n=76). The most common donor types were matched unrelated donor (39%), followed by haploidentical (30%) and matched related donor (26%). Median follow-up of survivors was 15 months (range, 1-72). One-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival were 59%, 45%, and 39% respectively. One-year non-relapse mortality and progression/relapse were 22% and 33% respectively. On multivariate analysis, <2 lines of intervening therapy between CAR T and alloHCT and complete response at time of alloHCT were associated with better outcomes. In conclusion, alloHCT after CAR T failure can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients.

Prognostic impact of peripheral eosinophil counts in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, many patients do not achieve remission or relapse after remission. Previous studies have demonstrated that eosinophils have synergistic anti-tumor effects with CD8+T cells and pre-CAR T-eosinophil counts are associated with the efficacy of CAR T cells. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the eosinophil counts of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and found it changed remarkably pre- and post-CAR T-cell therapy. RESULTS: Patients who achieved complete remission after CAR T-cell infusion had greater post-CAR T-eosinophil counts than those who did not. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with greater eosinophil counts during the second month after CAR T-cell infusion had superior progression-free survival and overall survival compared with those with lower eosinophil counts. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who responded to CAR T-cell therapy, eosinophil counts also can be used to predict 6-month duration of response. In conclusion, the post-CAR T-eosinophil count is associated with the prognosis of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy and can be used to clinically identify patients who can achieve longer remission after CAR T-cell infusion.

Epidemiology and etiology of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

As the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) incidence patterns generally parallel that for NHL overall. Globally, DLBCL accounts for a third of all NHLs, ranging between 20% and 50% by country. Based on United States (U.S.) cancer registry data, age-standardized incidence rate for DLBCL was 7.2 per 100,000. DLBCL incidence rises with age and is generally higher in males than females; in the U.S., incidence is highest among non-Hispanic whites (9.2/100,000). Like NHL incidence, DLBCL incidence rose in the first half of the 20th century but has largely plateaued. However, there is some evidence that incidence rates are rising in areas of historically low rates, such as Asia; there are also estimates for rising DLBCL incidence in the near future due to the changing demographics in developed countries whose aging population is growing. Established risk factors for DLBCL include those that result in severe immune deficiency such as HIV/AIDS, inherited immunodeficiency syndromes, and organ transplant recipients. Factors that lead to chronic immune dysregulations are also established risk factors, and include a number of autoimmune conditions (eg, Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis), viral infections (eg, HIV, KSHV/HHV8, HCV, EBV), and obesity. Family history of NHL/DLBCL, personal history of cancer, and multiple genetic susceptibility loci are also well-established risk factors for DLBCL. There is strong evidence for multiple environmental exposures in DLBCL etiology, including exposure to trichloroethylene, benzene, and pesticides and herbicides, with recent associations noted with glyphosate. There is also strong evidence for associations with other viruses, such as HBV. Recent estimates suggest that obesity accounts for nearly a quarter of DLBCLs that develop, but despite recent gains in the understanding of DLBCL etiology, the majority of disease remain unexplained. An understanding of the host and environmental contributions to disease etiology, and concerted efforts to expand our understanding to multiple race/ethnic groups, will be essential for constructing clinically relevant risk prediction models and develop effective strategies for disease prevention.

Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare disorder with an increasing incidence over the past decades. High-level evidence has been reported for the MATRix regimen (high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), high-dose AraC (HD-AraC), thiotepa and rituximab) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) supporting this approach to be considered a standard therapy in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients ≤ 70 years. However, early treatment-related toxicities (predominantly infectious complications), occurring in up to 28% per MATRix cycle, diminish its therapeutic success. Furthermore, sensitivity to first-line treatment is an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (OS) in PCNSL. Thus, patients achieving early partial remission (PR) after 2 cycles of MATRix might be over-treated with 4 cycles, in the context of consolidation HCT-ASCT. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicentre, randomized phase III trial with two parallel arms. 326 immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL will be recruited from 37 German, 1 Austrian and 12 UK sites. Additional IELSG (International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group) sites are planned. The objective is to demonstrate superiority of a de-escalated and optimised remission induction treatment strategy, followed by HCT-ASCT. Randomization (1:1) will be performed after completion of all screening procedures. Patients in Arm A (control treatment) will receive 4 cycles of MATRix. Patients in Arm B (experimental treatment) will receive a pre-phase (R/HD-MTX), followed by 2 cycles of MATRix. Patients in both arms achieving PR or better will proceed to HCT-ASCT (BCNU, thiotepa). The primary endpoint of the study is event-free-survival (EFS), defined as time from randomization to premature end of treatment due to any reason, lymphoma progression or death whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, neurocognitive impairment and quality of life. Minimal follow-up is 24 months. DISCUSSION: Current treatment options for PCNSL in patients ≤ 70 years have improved remarkably over recent years. However, the potential efficacy benefits are offset by an increased incidence of short-term toxicities which can impact on treatment delivery and hence on survival outcomes. In patients ≤ 70 years with newly diagnosed PCNSL addressing the need to reduce treatment-related toxicity by de-escalating and optimising the induction phase of treatment, is a potentially attractive treatment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German clinical trials registry DRKS00022768 registered June 10th, 2021.