Cutaneous sebaceous tumours and Lynch syndrome: long-term follow-up of 60 patients.

BACKGROUND: Sebaceous neoplasms (SN) may appear sporadically in the general population but may also be part of the Muir-Torre variant of Lynch syndrome (MT-LS). There are few studies in southern Europe on the incidence of MT-LS in the population of patients with SN. AIM: To retrospectively review patients with SN and to analyse their clinical features and the incidence of MT-LS. METHODS: Patients with SN diagnosed between 1995 and 2015 were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of MT-LS was made according to established clinical criteria and, whenever possible, was confirmed by germline mutation analysis. RESULTS: In 60 patients (32 men, 28 women, mean age 69.22 years), 96 SN were diagnosed: 65 adenomas (67.7%), 16 sebaceomas (16.7%) and 15 carcinomas (15.6%). Of the 60 patients, 50 (83.3%) had a single SN and 10 (16.7%) had multiple lesions. Patients diagnosed with MT-LS (12 patients, 20%) were younger (63.25 years vs. 70.71 years), and had a higher incidence of extrafacial SN (4/12 patients, 33.3%), and were significantly (P < 0.001) more likely to have multiple SNs (8/12, 75%) and keratoacanthomas (KAs) (6/12, 50%). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that all patients with SN should be investigated, as 20% of our patients were diagnosed with MT-LS. The most specific features of SN associated with MT-LS in our study were the presence of multiple lesions and association with KAs.

Recomendación para la determinación de biomarcadores en el carcinoma colorrectal. Consenso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica / Guidelines for biomarker testing in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Este documento de consenso nace como una iniciativa conjunta de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y propone recomendaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas para el manejo del paciente con cáncer colorrectal (CCR) hereditario, localizado y avanzado basadas en la evidencia científica que existe en la actualidad sobre el uso de biomarcadores. Por tanto, este documento supone una oportunidad para mejorar la eficiencia de la actividad asistencial y la utilización de recursos, lo que redundará en un beneficio para estos pacientes. Con los datos disponibles en la actualidad, este grupo de expertos recomienda que en los pacientes con CCR localizado se determine la inestabilidad de microsatélites, ya que es un factor predictivo relevante para decidir el tratamiento adyuvante. Sin embargo, aunque las firmas de expresión genética ColoPrint® y Oncotype Dx® han demostrado tener valor pronóstico, no existe todavía consenso sobre su uso en la práctica clínica. En cuanto al CCR avanzado, la determinación del estado mutacional de KRAS es indispensable antes de administrar un tratamiento con anti-receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (EGFR), como cetuximab y panitumumab. Sin embargo, la determinación de otros biomarcadores, como las mutaciones de BRAF, EGFR, PI3K y PTEN, no debe llevarse a cabo de forma rutinaria, ya que hoy por hoy no influye en la planificación del tratamiento. Otros aspectos importantes que incluye son los requisitos organizativos y los controles de calidad que deben existir para la adecuada determinación de estos biomarcadores, así como las implicaciones legales que se deben tener en cuenta(AU)

This consensus is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Based on scientific evidence of the use of biomarkers, it recommends diagnostic and treatment guidelines for the management of patients with hereditary, localised and advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the consensus is to improve healthcare and the use of resources, which will result in increased patient benefit. Taking into consideration data currently available, the group of experts recommends testing for microsatellite instability in patients with localised CRC, as this is a strong predictive factor useful in deciding the choice of adjuvant treatment. However, although the ColoPrint® and Oncotype Dx® gene expression signatures have been shown to have prognostic value, no consensus yet exists as to their clinical use. For advanced CRC, it is essential to test for KRAS mutation status before administering an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. However, at present, testing for other biomarkers, such as BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutations, is not indicated as a routine procedure as it does not influence choice of treatment. Other important issues addressed include organisational requirements, necessary quality controls for the correct testing of these biomarkers as well as the pertinent legal implications(AU)

Risk of gynecologic cancers in Danish hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families.

OBJECTIVE: Women in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families have an elevated risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer. The risk in Lynch syndrome families with known mutations in mismatch repair genes (MMR genes) seems to be higher than in familial colorectal cancer (CRC) families. Data in the Danish HNPCC register on the frequency and lifetime risk of gynecologic cancers were analyzed and the actual surveillance strategy discussed in relation to the results. DESIGN: Register-based retrospective study. METHOD: A total of 1,780 at-risk women were identified and epidemiological, clinical and MMR gene mutation data were retrieved. RESULTS: In a total of 105 cases of endometrial cancer, there was no significant difference in MSH2, MSH6 and MLH1 mutation carrier frequency. Compared to the general population, mutation carriers had a 20 times increase in lifetime risk of endometrial cancer. Lifetime risk was elevated four times in familial CRC families. In these families, frequency was correlated to the pedigree phenotype, with significantly higher frequency demonstrated in Amsterdam II families compared to Amsterdam I families and families suspected of HNPCC. A total of 39 cases of ovarian cancer were identified with a lifetime risk of three to four times the general population. No significant correlation was found between the frequency of ovarian cancer and MMR gene mutation status in the families. CONCLUSION: The benefit of surveillance concerning gynecological cancers seems to be less well founded in familial CRC families than in Lynch syndrome families. Modifying the surveillance strategy may be relevant in the future, but before changing existing guidelines concerning surveillance, further research is recommended.