Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(4): 1172-1175, 2021 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591934

ABSTRACT

Circulatory shock, caused by severe intravascular volume depletion resulting from gastrointestinal losses and profound capillary leak, is a common clinical feature of viral hemorrhagic fevers, including Ebola virus disease, Marburg hemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever. These conditions are associated with high case fatality rates, and they carry a significant risk of infection for treating personnel. Optimized fluid therapy is the cornerstone of management of these diseases, but there are few data on the extent of fluid losses and the severity of the capillary leak in patients with VHFs, and no specific guidelines for fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic monitoring exist. We propose an innovative approach for monitoring VHF patients, in particular suited for low-resource settings, facilitating optimizing fluid therapy through remote-controlled and pulse pressure-guided fluid resuscitation. This strategy would increase the capacity for adequate supportive care, while decreasing the risk for virus transmission to health personnel.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy/methods , Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral/therapy , Adult , Algorithms , Animals , Blood Pressure , Disease Outbreaks , Fluid Therapy/instrumentation , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral/physiopathology , Humans , Lassa Fever/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Remote Sensing Technology
2.
Infez Med ; 28(3): 332-345, 2020 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920568

ABSTRACT

Marburg Virus (MARV), along with the Ebola virus, belongs to the family of Filovirus and is cause of a lethal and severely affecting hemorrhagic fever. The Marburgvirus genus includes two viruses: MARV and Ravn. MARV has been recognized as one of utmost importance by the World Health Organization (WHO). The case fatality rate of the virus ranges from 24.0 to 88.0% which demonstrates its lethal nature and the need for its widespread information. The first case of the Marburgvirus disease (MARD) was reported in 1967 when lab personnel working with African green monkeys got infected in Germany and Serbia simultaneously. Following the initial case, many more outbreaks occurred around the world such as Uganda, Angola, Congo, Kenya and even in the United States in 2008. It was soon found out that the MARV was a zoonotic virus and mainly contracted from animal-to-human contact and further transmitted via human-to-human contact. The Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) is known to be one of the significant sources of the infection and tourists visiting caves inhabited by these bats or workers accessing mines, populated by the bats, are at an increased risk of contracting the illness. The incubation period ranges from 2-21 days and the clinical outcome can be broken down into three phases: initial generalized phase (day 1-4), early organ phase (day 5 to 13) and either a late organ/convalescence phase (day 13 onwards). Furthermore, the treatment of MARD is solely based on supportive care. Much has been investigated in over the past half-century of the initial infection but only a few treatment options show promising results. In addition, special precaution is advised whilst handling the patient or the biospecimens. Disease-modifying agents and inhibitors of viral replications show constructive outcomes. It is crucial to identify the host of the virus and educate the populations that are greatly at risk of the disease. While much is being investigated to devise a vaccine, it is important to educate Health Care Workers (HCWs) and close contacts facing the illness. Stopping the transmission remains the best measure that can be taken.


Subject(s)
Marburg Virus Disease , Viral Zoonoses , Animals , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/transmission , Viral Zoonoses/diagnosis , Viral Zoonoses/epidemiology , Viral Zoonoses/therapy , Viral Zoonoses/transmission
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 99: 233-242, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758690

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes the countermeasures for Marburg virus disease, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical features and diagnostics. There is an emphasis on therapies and vaccines that have demonstrated, through their evaluation in nonhuman primates (NHPs) and/or in humans, potential for use in an emergency situation. METHODS: A standardized literature review was conducted on vaccines and treatments for Marburg virus disease, with a focus on human and nonhuman primate data published in the last five years. More detail on the methods that were used is summarized in a companion methods paper. RESULTS: The study identified six treatments and four vaccine platforms that have demonstrated, through their efficacy in NHPs, potential benefit for treating or preventing infection in humans. CONCLUSION: Succinct summaries of Marburg countermeasures are provided to give the busy clinician a head start in reviewing the literature if faced with a patient with Marburg virus disease. Links to other authoritative sources of information are also provided.


Subject(s)
Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Animals , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/immunology , Marburg Virus Disease/prevention & control , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Marburgvirus/immunology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Vaccines/immunology
4.
Lab Med ; 50(1): 16-28, 2019 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30085179

ABSTRACT

Ebolaviruses have gained much attention recently due to the outbreak from 2014 through 2016. The related marburgviruses also have been responsible for large outbreaks with high case fatality rates. The purpose of this article is to provide the clinical laboratory scientist with a review of the most current developments in marburgvirus research. The PubMed database was reviewed using the keywords "Marburg virus," "Ravn virus," and "marburgviruses," with publication dates from January 1, 2015 through June 20, 2017. The search yielded 345 articles. In total, 52 articles met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Advances have been made in the areas of ecology and host reservoir studies, seroprevalence studies, pathology and pathogenesis studies, laboratory assay development, and treatment and vaccine development. Marburgviruses are highly lethal viruses that pose a significant threat to the human population. Although numerous advances have been made, there are still large gaps in knowledge, and it is imperative that scientists gain more information to fully understand virus/host interactions. An approved vaccine and treatment remain elusive.


Subject(s)
Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Marburgvirus/pathogenicity , Animals , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/pathology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/transmission , Marburgvirus/genetics
5.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 21S: e28-e31, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24816494

ABSTRACT

Marburg virus haemorrhagic fever (MARV HF) is a dramatic disease that can occur in a traveller returning from an area where the virus is endemic. In this article, we provide an overview of MARV HF as an imported infection with an emphasis on clinical aspects. Although late features such as rash, signs of haemorrhagic diathesis and liver necrosis may point to the diagnosis, the initial clinical picture is non-specific. If in this early phase the patient's epidemiological exposure history is compatible with MARV HF, the patient should be isolated and managed according to viral haemorrhagic fever protocol and RT-PCR should be performed on the patient's blood as soon as possible to rule out MARV HF (or other possible viral haemorrhagic fevers). In severe cases, direct electron microscopy of blood in specialized centres (e.g. Bernhard-Nocht Institute in Hamburg, Germany) may be considered if the result of the RT-PCR is not readily available. Adequate diagnostics and empirical treatment for other acute life-threatening illnesses should not be withheld while test results are awaited, but all management and diagnostics should be weighed against the risks of nosocomial transmission.


Subject(s)
Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/prevention & control , Marburgvirus/isolation & purification , Travel-Related Illness , Animals , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Infection Control , Marburg Virus Disease/pathology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/pathogenicity
6.
Cell Rep ; 24(7): 1802-1815.e5, 2018 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30110637

ABSTRACT

Some monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recovered from survivors of filovirus infections can protect against infection. It is currently unknown whether natural infection also induces some antibodies with the capacity for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). A panel of mAbs obtained from human survivors of filovirus infection caused by Ebola, Bundibugyo, or Marburg viruses was evaluated for their ability to facilitate ADE. ADE was observed readily with all mAbs examined at sub-neutralizing concentrations, and this effect was not restricted to mAbs with a particular epitope specificity, neutralizing capacity, or subclass. Blocking of specific Fcγ receptors reduced but did not abolish ADE that was associated with high-affinity binding antibodies, suggesting that lower-affinity interactions still cause ADE. Mutations of Fc fragments of an mAb that altered its interaction with Fc receptors rendered the antibody partially protective in vivo at a low dose, suggesting that ADE counteracts antibody-mediated protection and facilitates dissemination of filovirus infections.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/pharmacology , Antibodies, Viral/pharmacology , Antibody-Dependent Enhancement , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Neutralizing/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , Ebolavirus/drug effects , Ebolavirus/genetics , Ebolavirus/immunology , Ebolavirus/pathogenicity , Epitopes/genetics , Epitopes/immunology , Gene Expression , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/immunology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/mortality , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Humans , Immune Sera/chemistry , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/chemistry , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/genetics , Marburg Virus Disease/immunology , Marburg Virus Disease/mortality , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/drug effects , Marburgvirus/genetics , Marburgvirus/pathogenicity , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Monocytes/drug effects , Monocytes/immunology , Monocytes/virology , Primary Cell Culture , Receptors, IgG/genetics , Receptors, IgG/immunology , Survival Analysis , Survivors , THP-1 Cells , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Viral Envelope Proteins/immunology
7.
Zool Res ; 39(1): 15-24, 2018 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29511141

ABSTRACT

The family Filoviridae, which includes the genera Marburgvirus and Ebolavirus, contains some of the most pathogenic viruses in humans and non-human primates (NHPs), causing severe hemorrhagic fevers with high fatality rates. Small animal models against filoviruses using mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, and ferrets have been developed with the goal of screening candidate vaccines and antivirals, before testing in the gold standard NHP models. In this review, we summarize the different animal models used to understand filovirus pathogenesis, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to filovirus disease research.


Subject(s)
Filoviridae Infections , Animals , Cricetinae , Disease Models, Animal , Ferrets , Filoviridae Infections/etiology , Filoviridae Infections/therapy , Filoviridae Infections/virology , Guinea Pigs , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/etiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Marburg Virus Disease/etiology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Mesocricetus , Mice , Primates
8.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 10(2): e0004456, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901785

ABSTRACT

Marburg virus (MARV) is an Ebola-like virus in the family Filovirdae that causes sporadic outbreaks of severe hemorrhagic fever with a case fatality rate as high as 90%. AVI-7288, a positively charged antisense phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMOplus) targeting the viral nucleoprotein gene, was evaluated as a potential therapeutic intervention for MARV infection following delayed treatment of 1, 24, 48, and 96 h post-infection (PI) in a nonhuman primate lethal challenge model. A total of 30 cynomolgus macaques were divided into 5 groups of 6 and infected with 1,830 plaque forming units of MARV subcutaneously. AVI-7288 was administered by bolus infusion daily for 14 days at 15 mg/kg body weight. Survival was the primary endpoint of the study. While none (0 of 6) of the saline group survived, 83-100% of infected monkeys survived when treatment was initiated 1, 24, 48, or 96 h post-infection (PI). The antisense treatment also reduced serum viremia and inflammatory cytokines in all treatment groups compared to vehicle controls. The antibody immune response to virus was preserved and tissue viral antigen was cleared in AVI-7288 treated animals. These data show that AVI-7288 protects NHPs against an otherwise lethal MARV infection when treatment is initiated up to 96 h PI.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Genetic Therapy , Macaca fascicularis , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/genetics , Morpholinos/administration & dosage , RNA, Antisense/genetics , Animals , Female , Humans , Macaca fascicularis/virology , Male , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Marburgvirus/physiology , Morpholinos/genetics , Morpholinos/metabolism , RNA, Antisense/metabolism , Time-to-Treatment
9.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0140290, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26451847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A rapid review, guided by a protocol, was conducted to inform development of the World Health Organization's guideline on personal protective equipment in the context of the ongoing (2013-present) Western African filovirus disease outbreak, with a focus on health care workers directly caring for patients with Ebola or Marburg virus diseases. METHODS: Electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched. Eligibility criteria initially included comparative studies on Ebola and Marburg virus diseases reported in English or French, but criteria were expanded to studies on other viral hemorrhagic fevers and non-comparative designs due to the paucity of studies. After title and abstract screening (two people to exclude), full-text reports of potentially relevant articles were assessed in duplicate. Fifty-seven percent of extraction information was verified. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to inform the quality of evidence assessments. RESULTS: Thirty non-comparative studies (8 related to Ebola virus disease) were located, and 27 provided data on viral transmission. Reporting of personal protective equipment components and infection prevention and control protocols was generally poor. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists to draw conclusions regarding the comparative effectiveness of various types of personal protective equipment. Additional research is urgently needed to determine optimal PPE for health care workers caring for patients with filovirus.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Marburg Virus Disease , Patient Care , Personal Protective Equipment , Animals , Disease Outbreaks , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 125(6): 1293-1298, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26000499

ABSTRACT

The largest-ever recorded outbreak of viral hemorrhagic fever is ongoing. As a result of the epidemic and rural nature of outbreaks, little is published about the Filovirus infections Ebola virus disease and Marburg disease in pregnancy. This review of viral hemorrhagic fever focusing on Marburg and Ebola uses knowledge of disease in nonpregnant individuals and pregnancy-specific data to inform management for pregnant women. Filovirus infection presentation is similar between pregnant and nonpregnant patients, although infections may be more severe in pregnancy. Although labeled as hemorrhagic fevers, Marburg and Ebola do not commonly cause gross bleeding and should be conceptualized as diseases of high gastrointestinal losses. Early, aggressive supportive care is the mainstay of Filovirus infection management with massive fluid resuscitation as the key management principle. Patients often require 5-10 L or more per day of intravenous or oral fluid to maintain circulating blood volume in the setting of ongoing gastrointestinal loss. Fluid shifts warrant aggressive monitoring and correction of potassium levels and acid-base disturbances to prevent life-threatening arrhythmias and metabolic complications. Regardless of maternal survival, fetal loss rates are nearly 100% in Filovirus infection, likely resulting from unchecked transplacental and hematogenous viral spread. High fetal loss rates support the placenta as a difficult-to-eradicate Filovirus infection reservoir. In conclusion, the management of Filovirus infection in pregnancy should focus on stabilizing the mother with intensive monitoring and aggressive fluid and electrolyte repletion as well as maintaining strict infection control to minimize transmission to others.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Animals , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/blood , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/transmission , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/blood , Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/prevention & control , Marburg Virus Disease/transmission , Potassium/blood , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology
11.
J Clin Virol ; 64: 111-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25660265

ABSTRACT

Ebolaviruses and Marburgviruses (family Filoviridae) are among the most virulent pathogens for humans and great apes causing severe haemorrhagic fever and death within a matter of days. This group of viruses is characterized by a linear, non-segmented, single-stranded RNA genome of negative polarity. The overall burden of filovirus infections is minimal and negligible compared to the devastation caused by malnutrition and other infectious diseases prevalent in Africa such as malaria, dengue or tuberculosis. In this paper, we review the knowledge gained on the eco/epidemiology, the pathogenesis and the disease control measures for Marburg and Ebola viruses developed over the last 15 years. The overall progress is promising given the little attention that these pathogen have achieved in the past; however, more is to come over the next decade given the more recent interest in these pathogens as potential public and animal health concerns. Licensing of therapeutic and prophylactic options may be achievable over the next 5-10 years.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Marburg Virus Disease , Africa/epidemiology , Animals , Disease Outbreaks , Ebolavirus/pathogenicity , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Marburg Virus Disease/prevention & control , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/pathogenicity , Prevalence
12.
Med Monatsschr Pharm ; 37(9): 324-30; quiz 331-2, 2014 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25282746

ABSTRACT

Marburg and Ebola hemorrhagic fevers are severe, systemic viral diseases affecting humans and non-human primates. They are characterized by multiple symptoms such as hemorrhages, fever, headache, muscle and abdominal pain, chills, sore throat, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Elevated liver-associated enzyme levels and coagulopathy are also associated with these diseases. Marburg and Ebola hemorrhagic fevers are caused by (Lake victoria) Marburg virus and different species of Ebola viruses, respectively. They are enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses and belong to the family of filoviridae. Case fatality rates of filovirus disease outbreaks are among the highest reported for any human pathogen, ranging from 25 to 90% or more. Outbreaks of Marburg and Ebola hemorrhagic fever occur in certain regions of equatorial Africa at irregular intervals. Since 2000, the number of outbreaks has increased. In 2014, the biggest outbreak of a filovirus-induced hemorrhagic fever that has been documented so far occurred from March to July 2014 in Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Nigeria. The outbreak was caused by a new variant of Zaire Ebola-Virus, affected more than 2600 people (stated 20 August) and was associated with case-fatality rates of up to 67% (Guinea). Treatment of Marburg and Ebola hemorrhagic fevers is symptomatic and supportive, licensed antiviral agents are currently not available. Recently, BCX4430, a promising synthetic adenosine analogue with high in vitro and in vivo activity against filoviruses and other RNA viruses, has been described. BCX4430 inhibits viral RNA polymerase activity and protects cynomolgus macaques from Marburg virus infection when administered as late as 48 hours after infection. Nucleic acid-based products, recombinant vaccines and antibodies appear to be less suitable for the treatment of Marburg and Ebola hemorrhagic fevers.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Africa/epidemiology , Animals , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Outbreaks , Disease Reservoirs , Ebolavirus/classification , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/mortality , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/mortality , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Marburgvirus/classification
13.
Sci Transl Med ; 6(250): 250ra116, 2014 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25143366

ABSTRACT

Marburg virus (MARV) and the closely related filovirus Ebola virus cause severe and often fatal hemorrhagic fever (HF) in humans and nonhuman primates with mortality rates up to 90%. There are no vaccines or drugs approved for human use, and no postexposure treatment has completely protected nonhuman primates against MARV-Angola, the strain associated with the highest rate of mortality in naturally occurring human outbreaks. Studies performed with other MARV strains assessed candidate treatments at times shortly after virus exposure, before signs of disease are detectable. We assessed the efficacy of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery of anti-MARV nucleoprotein (NP)-targeting small interfering RNA (siRNA) at several time points after virus exposure, including after the onset of detectable disease in a uniformly lethal nonhuman primate model of MARV-Angola HF. Twenty-one rhesus monkeys were challenged with a lethal dose of MARV-Angola. Sixteen of these animals were treated with LNP containing anti-MARV NP siRNA beginning at 30 to 45 min, 1 day, 2 days, or 3 days after virus challenge. All 16 macaques that received LNP-encapsulated anti-MARV NP siRNA survived infection, whereas the untreated or mock-treated control subjects succumbed to disease between days 7 and 9 after infection. These results represent the successful demonstration of therapeutic anti-MARV-Angola efficacy in nonhuman primates and highlight the substantial impact of an LNP-delivered siRNA therapeutic as a countermeasure against this highly lethal human disease.


Subject(s)
Lipids/therapeutic use , Macaca mulatta/virology , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Marburgvirus/physiology , Nanoparticles/therapeutic use , RNA, Small Interfering/therapeutic use , Animals , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Humans , Macaca mulatta/immunology , Marburg Virus Disease/pathology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/immunology , Nanoparticles/chemistry , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Viremia/pathology
14.
Viruses ; 6(2): 927-37, 2014 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24556792

ABSTRACT

Understanding human filovirus hemorrhagic fever (FHF) clinical manifestations and evaluating treatment strategies require the collection of clinical data in outbreak settings, where clinical documentation has been limited. Currently, no consensus among filovirus outbreak-response organisations guides best practice for clinical documentation and data transfer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care workers (HCWs) involved in FHF outbreaks in sub-Saharan Africa, and with HCWs experienced in documenting and transferring data from high-risk areas (isolation wards or biosafety level 4 laboratories). Methods for data documentation and transfer were identified, described in detail and categorised by requirement for electricity and ranked by interviewee preference. Some methods involve removing paperwork and other objects from the filovirus disease ward without disinfection. We believe that if done properly, these methods are reasonably safe for certain settings. However, alternative methods avoiding the removal of objects, or involving the removal of paperwork or objects after non-damaging disinfection, are available. These methods are not only safer, they are also perceived as safer and likely more acceptable to health workers and members of the community. The use of standardised clinical forms is overdue. Experiments with by sunlight disinfection should continue, and non-damaging disinfection of impregnated paper, suitable tablet computers and underwater cameras should be evaluated under field conditions.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Disinfection/methods , Electronic Health Records , Health Personnel/psychology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Patient Isolation , Africa South of the Sahara , Animals , Attitude of Health Personnel , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology
15.
Immunotherapy ; 5(11): 1221-33, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24188676

ABSTRACT

Multiple recent, independent studies have confirmed that passively administered antibodies can provide effective postexposure therapy in nonhuman primates after exposure to an otherwise lethal dose of Ebola virus or Marburg virus. In this article, we review composition and performance of the antibody cocktails tested thus far, what is known about antibody epitopes on the viral glycoprotein target and ongoing research questions in further development of such cocktails for pre-exposure or emergency postexposure use.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use , Ebolavirus/immunology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Immunization, Passive , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , Haplorhini , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/immunology , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/immunology
16.
Curr Pharm Des ; 19(16): 2963-9, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23140456

ABSTRACT

Morpholino oligos (Morpholinos) are widely used tools for knocking down gene expression and are currently in a clinical trial for treatment of Duchene muscular dystrophy. A Morpholino analog has been in a clinical trial as a potential anti-bioterrorism agent for inhibiting replication of deadly Marburg viral infection. The cellular uptake of Morpholinos can been greatly increased by conjugation with cell-penetrating peptides (CPP). The use of the CPP-Morpholino conjugates (PPMOs) in vivo has been broadly demonstrated in viral, bacterial, genetic and other diseases. The following aspects of PPMOs will be discussed in this paper including chemistry, stability, antisense specificity, mechanism of cellular uptake, in vivo efficacy, tissue distribution, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and the human clinical trials. PPMOs are powerful research tools for studying gene function in animals and their properties are being improved as potential human therapeutic agents.


Subject(s)
Cell-Penetrating Peptides/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems , Morpholinos/administration & dosage , Animals , Bioterrorism , Cell-Penetrating Peptides/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Morpholinos/pharmacokinetics , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/therapy , Tissue Distribution
17.
Viruses ; 4(11): 2806-30, 2012 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23202506

ABSTRACT

There are no currently approved treatments for filovirus infections. In this study we report the discovery process which led to the development of antisense Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomers (PMOs) AVI-6002 (composed of AVI-7357 and AVI-7539) and AVI-6003 (composed of AVI-7287 and AVI-7288) targeting Ebola virus and Marburg virus respectively. The discovery process involved identification of optimal transcript binding sites for PMO based RNA-therapeutics followed by screening for effective viral gene target in mouse and guinea pig models utilizing adapted viral isolates. An evolution of chemical modifications were tested, beginning with simple Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomers (PMO) transitioning to cell penetrating peptide conjugated PMOs (PPMO) and ending with PMOplus containing a limited number of positively charged linkages in the PMO structure. The initial lead compounds were combinations of two agents targeting separate genes. In the final analysis, a single agent for treatment of each virus was selected, AVI-7537 targeting the VP24 gene of Ebola virus and AVI-7288 targeting NP of Marburg virus, and are now progressing into late stage clinical development as the optimal therapeutic candidates.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Ebolavirus/genetics , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus/genetics , Morpholinos/administration & dosage , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense/administration & dosage , Animals , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Base Sequence , Ebolavirus/metabolism , Genes, Viral , Guinea Pigs , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/mortality , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Marburg Virus Disease/mortality , Marburg Virus Disease/virology , Marburgvirus/metabolism , Mice , Morpholinos/chemistry , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense/chemistry , Primates , Protein Biosynthesis/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/metabolism
18.
Int J Dermatol ; 51(9): 1037-43, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22909355

ABSTRACT

Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus, two filoviruses belonging to the Filoviridae family, are among the most virulent pathogens for humans and non-human primates, causing outbreaks of fulminant hemorrhagic fever (HF) in Central African countries with case fatality rates of up to 90%. Fruit bats are the likely reservoir, and human infection occurs through contact with bats or infected large-animal carcasses or by person-to-person contact (through body fluids, medical care, and burial practices). Schematically, clinical manifestations occur in three successive phases and include general, gastrointestinal, and mucocutaneous disorders. Death usually results from hemorrhagic complications. Cutaneous manifestations rarely make a major contribution to disease severity but can assist with the diagnosis. Rash, the main cutaneous disorder, is nonspecific and cannot guide the differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical examination of skin biopsy or necropsy specimens can confirm the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/complications , Marburg Virus Disease/complications , Skin Diseases/virology , Animals , Ebolavirus , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Marburgvirus , Skin Diseases/pathology
19.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 12(8): 635-42, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22394985

ABSTRACT

A woman developed Marburg haemorrhagic fever in the Netherlands, most likely as a consequence of being exposed to virus-infected bats in the python cave in Maramagambo Forest during a visit to Uganda. The clinical syndrome was dominated by acute liver failure with secondary coagulopathy, followed by a severe systemic inflammatory response, multiorgan failure, and fatal cerebral oedema. A high blood viral load persisted during the course of the disease. The initial systemic inflammatory response coincided with peaks in interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α concentrations in the blood. A terminal rise in interleukin-6, placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (sVEGF-R1) seemed to suggest an advanced pathophysiological stage of Marburg haemorrhagic fever associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction and fatal cerebral oedema. The excess of circulating sVEGF-R1 and the high sVEGF-R1:PlGF ratio shortly before death resemble pathophysiological changes thought to play a causative part in pre-eclampsia. Aggressive critical-care treatment with renal replacement therapy and use of the molecular absorbent recirculation system appeared able to stabilise--at least temporarily--the patient's condition.


Subject(s)
Marburg Virus Disease/blood , Marburg Virus Disease/complications , Adult , Animals , Brain Edema/virology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Interleukin-1/blood , Liver Failure, Acute/virology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Multiple Organ Failure/virology , Placenta Growth Factor , Pregnancy Proteins/blood , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1/blood
20.
Clin Lab Med ; 30(1): 161-77, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20513546

ABSTRACT

Ebola and Marburg viruses cause a severe viral hemorrhagic fever disease mainly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Although outbreaks are sporadic, there is the potential for filoviruses to spread to other continents unintentionally because of air travel or intentionally because of bioterrorism. This article discusses the natural history, epidemiology, and clinical presentation of patients infected with Ebola and Marburg viruses. Clinicians in the United States should be aware of the symptoms of these viral infections in humans and know the appropriate procedures for contacting local, state, and national reference laboratories in the event of a suspected case of filoviral hemorrhagic fever.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/diagnosis , Marburg Virus Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Diagnosis, Differential , Filoviridae/classification , Filoviridae/genetics , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/etiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/etiology , Marburg Virus Disease/therapy , Phylogeny , Viral Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...