Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Vaccine ; 35(36): 4695-4701, 2017 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754487

ABSTRACT

Gallid herpesvirus 2 (GaHV-2) continuously evolves, which reduces the effectiveness of existing vaccines. To construct new GaHV-2 candidate vaccines, LMS, which is a virulent GaHV-2 field strain isolated from diseased chicken flocks in Southwest China in 2007, was modified such that both copies of its meq oncogene were partially deleted. The resulting virus, i.e., rMSΔmeq, was characterized using PCR and sequencing. To evaluate the safety and protective efficacy of rMSΔmeq, specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were inoculated with 2000 plaque forming units (pfu) and 20,000pfu of rMSΔmeq immediately after hatching. All birds grew well during the experimental period, and none of the challenged chickens developed Marek's disease-associated lymphoma. In addition, the rMSΔmeq- and CVI988/Rispens-vaccinated SPF chickens were challenged with 1000 pfu and 5000 pfu of the representative virulent GaHV-2 Md5 strain and 1000 pfu of the variant GaHV-2 strains LCC or LTS. The results showed that the rMSΔmeq strain provided complete protection, which was similar to that provided by the CVI988/Rispens vaccine (protective index (PI) of 95.5) when challenged with a conventional dose of the Md5 strain. However, rMSΔmeq provided a PI of 90.9 when challenged with 5000 pfu of the Md5 strain, which was significantly higher than that provided by the CVI988/Rispens vaccine (54.5). rMSΔmeq provided a PI of 86.4 against LCC, which was equal to that provided by the CVI988/Rispens vaccine (81.8). In addition, rMSΔmeq provided a PI of 100 against LTS, which was significantly higher than that provided by the CVI988/Rispens vaccine (68.2). Altogether, the rMSΔmeq virus provided efficient protection against representative and variant GaHV-2 strains. In conclusion, the rMSΔmeq virus is a safe and effective vaccine candidate for the prevention of Marek's disease and is effective against the Chinese variant GaHV-2 strains.


Subject(s)
Herpesvirus 2, Gallid/genetics , Herpesvirus 2, Gallid/immunology , Marek Disease Vaccines/immunology , Marek Disease/prevention & control , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/genetics , Animals , Chickens/immunology , China/epidemiology , Gene Deletion , Herpesvirus 2, Gallid/pathogenicity , Marek Disease/epidemiology , Marek Disease Vaccines/administration & dosage , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Marek Disease Vaccines/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Poultry Diseases/immunology , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/virology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Vaccines, Synthetic/genetics , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
2.
Poult Sci ; 96(5): 1071-1077, 2017 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27794051

ABSTRACT

Effects of 2 types of methods of administration (moa; in ovo or s.c.) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 and 18 h pre-placement holding times (pht) on the performance of male broilers through 48 d of age were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either in ovo-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not in ovo-injected were vaccinated s.c. at hatch, and chicks from each moa group were held for one of the 2 pht. In ovo injections (50 µL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (0.2 mL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. Sixteen birds were assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the 4 moa and pht combination groups. Mortality and BW gain were determined at weekly intervals, and feed consumption and conversion were determined in the zero to 14, 14 to 28, 28 to 42, and 42 to 48 d age intervals. No interactive effects between moa and pht were observed for any variable, and mortality was not significantly affected by moa or pht. The 14 to 28 d feed consumption and 14 to 21 d BW gain of s.c.-vaccinated birds were lower than that of in ovo-vaccinated birds, and the increase in pht from 4 to 18 h decreased feed consumption through 28 d post hatch and BW gain through 35 d post hatch. Overall, the performances of male Ross 708 broilers through 48 d of age in response to in ovo and s.c. injections of the MD vaccine were comparable, and delays in hatchling placement should be less that 18 h in duration. Furthermore, despite the decrease in BW gain through 35 d associated with the reduction in feed consumption through 28 d in response to the 14 h increase in pht, in ovo injection did not exacerbate the effect of the increase in pht.


Subject(s)
Chickens/growth & development , Marek Disease Vaccines/administration & dosage , Animals , Injections/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Male , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Ovum , Weight Gain
3.
Vaccine ; 34(35): 4180-4187, 2016 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27371103

ABSTRACT

Marek's disease virus (MDV) induces tumors and severe immunosuppression in chickens. MDV-induced immunosuppression (MDV-IS) is very complex and difficult to study. In particular, the late MDV-IS (late-MDV-IS) is of great concern since it can occur in the absence of lymphoid organ atrophy or gross tumors. We have recently developed a model to reproduce late-MDV-IS under laboratory conditions. This model measures MDV-IS indirectly by assessing the effect of MDV infection on the efficacy of infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) vaccination; hence the name late-MDV-IS ILT model. In this study, we have used the late-MDV-IS ILT model to evaluate if MD vaccination can protect against late-MDV-IS. One experiment was conducted to determine whether serotype 1 MD vaccines (CVI988 and Md5ΔMEQ) could induce late-MDV-IS by themselves. Three additional experiments were conducted to evaluate efficacy of different MD vaccines (HVT, HVT+SB-1, CVI988, and Md5ΔMEQ) and different vaccine protocols (day-old vaccination, in ovo vaccination, and double vaccination) against late-MDV-IS. Our results show that none of the currently used vaccine protocols (HVT, HVT+SB-1, or CVI988 administered at day of age, in ovo, or in double vaccination protocols) protected against late-MDV-IS induced by vv+MDV strains 648A and 686. Experimental vaccine Md5ΔMEQ administered subcutaneously at one day of age was the only vaccine protocol that significantly reduced late-MDV-IS induced by vv+MDV strain 686. This study demonstrates that currently used vaccine protocols confer high levels of protection against MDV-induced tumors (protection index=100), but do not protect against late-MDV-IS; thus, commercial poultry flocks could suffer late-MDV-IS even in complete absence of tumors. Our results suggest that MDV-IS might not be related to the development of tumors and novel control methods are needed. Further evaluation of the experimental vaccine Md5ΔMEQ might shed light on protective mechanisms against late-MDV-IS.


Subject(s)
Immune Tolerance , Marek Disease Vaccines/administration & dosage , Marek Disease/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary , Animals , Chickens , Female , Marek Disease/immunology , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Neoplasms/virology , Vaccination/methods
4.
Poult Sci ; 95(9): 2038-44, 2016 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27143771

ABSTRACT

Effects of method of administration [moa; in ovo (i.o.) or s.c.] of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time (pht) on early post-hatch male broiler chick quality was investigated. Sixty-five Ross × Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs were randomly set in each of 15 replicate trays (blocks) belonging to each of 4 pre-assigned moa and pht treatment combinations (3,900 total eggs) in a single stage Jamesway incubator. Eggs that were i.o.-vaccinated received injections at 18 d of incubation and male chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-injected were vaccinated by s.c. injection at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 µL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and the s.c. injections (200 µL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. Male chicks from each moa group also were subjected to either a 4 or 18 h pht. At hatch and placement total and yolk-free BW; body length; body mass index; yolk sac weight; yolk-free body and yolk sac weights as percentages of total BW; and yolk-free body and yolk moisture concentrations were determined. Chick BW also was determined at 7 d of age. Hatchability of fertile eggs was not affected by i.o. injection. However, at hatch, body length was increased and body mass index was decreased in response to i.o. injection. No main effect of moa or an interactive effect with pht was observed for the above variables at placement. However, body length was longer and body mass was lower in the 18 h than in the 4 h pht chicks. Placement yolk sac and body weights, and the 7 d BW of 18 h pht chicks was also lower than that of 4 h pht chicks. In conclusion, prolonging pht for 14 h adversely affected early chick quality, whereas i.o. injection did not negatively affect the early post-hatch quality of Ross × Ross 708 broiler chicks whether or not they were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement.


Subject(s)
Chickens/physiology , Marek Disease Vaccines/administration & dosage , Animals , Body Weight , Chickens/growth & development , Female , Injections/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Male , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Random Allocation
5.
PLoS Biol ; 13(8): e1002236, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26305571

ABSTRACT

There is little doubt evolution has played a major role in preventing the control of infectious disease through antibiotic and insecticide resistance, but recent theory suggests disease interventions such as vaccination may lead to evolution of more harmful parasites. A new study published in PLOS Biology by Andrew Read and colleagues shows empirically that vaccination against Marek's disease has favored higher virulence; without intervention, the birds die too quickly for any transmission to occur, but vaccinated hosts can both stay alive longer and shed the virus. This is an elegant empirical demonstration of how evolutionary theory can predict potentially dangerous responses of infectious disease to human interventions.


Subject(s)
Mardivirus/pathogenicity , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Marek Disease/transmission , Selection, Genetic , Animals
7.
PLoS Biol ; 13(7): e1002198, 2015 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26214839

ABSTRACT

Could some vaccines drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens? Conventional wisdom is that natural selection will remove highly lethal pathogens if host death greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population. Here we show experimentally that immunization of chickens against Marek's disease virus enhances the fitness of more virulent strains, making it possible for hyperpathogenic strains to transmit. Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.


Subject(s)
Mardivirus/pathogenicity , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Marek Disease/transmission , Selection, Genetic , Animals , Chickens , Mardivirus/genetics , Marek Disease/immunology , Virus Shedding
8.
Avian Dis ; 56(3): 494-500, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23050465

ABSTRACT

CVI988 (Rispens) is currently the most effective vaccine used to protect against Marek's disease, a lymphoproliferative disease of chickens. A MEQ-deleted Marek's disease virus strain has shown promise as a vaccine candidate; however, unpublished results from vaccine safety trials suggest that this candidate vaccine induces unwanted lymphoid atrophy. The current study evaluated lymphoid atrophy at multiple time points between 2- and 8-wk postinoculation and attempted to correlate results with virus replication in the thymus. Results confirm reports that MEQ-deleted virus strains are able to cause thymus and bursa atrophy, which is most severe at 2-wk postinoculation. The MEQ-deleted virus strains induced lower body weights and relative thymus and bursa weights compared to uninoculated and Rispens-vaccinated chickens at multiple time points between 2- and 8-wk postinoculation. Both MEQ-deleted virus strains produced high levels of in vivo virus replication in the thymus at rates significantly greater than in Rispens-vaccinated chickens and were comparable to levels of RM1 virus, a MDV previously shown to induce severe thymus and bursa atrophy. Virus replication was highly correlated with relative thymus weights at each time point. Understanding this delicate balance between inducing maximum disease protection and preventing immunodepressive effects is critical for the development of future Marek's disease vaccines.


Subject(s)
Bursa of Fabricius/pathology , Chickens , Marek Disease Vaccines/immunology , Marek Disease/prevention & control , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/genetics , Thymus Gland/pathology , Animals , Gene Deletion , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Weight Gain/immunology
9.
Vaccine ; 26(44): 5595-600, 2008 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18706949

ABSTRACT

The Marek's disease virus (MDV) vaccine strains CVI 988 and herpes virus of turkeys (HVT) strain FC126, usually are grown in primary chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF). We found that the strains could be grown also in the so-called JBJ-1 cell line to titres in the same range as when chicken embryo fibroblasts were used. The JBJ-1 cell line is a fibroblast-like continuous chicken cell line, which can be grown in flat bottom tissue culture flasks, roller bottles and on micro carriers. We investigated the efficacy of experimental CVI 988 vaccines grown in JBJ-1 cells and the efficacy of combinations of CVI 988 grown in JBJ-1 cells with HVT FC 126 also grown in JBJ-1 cells. The study was performed in accordance with European Pharmacopoeia monograph 0589 for live MDV disease vaccines. Groups of 1-day-old SPF chicks were vaccinated subcutaneously or intramuscularly, with 10(2.5) TCID50 per dose of CVI 988 alone or in combination with 500PFU per dose of HVT. As a control a group vaccinated with CVI 988 grown in CEF was included. One group was not vaccinated. Five days after vaccination all chickens were challenged with the very virulent MDV strain RB1B. After challenge the chickens were observed for a period of 70 days for signs of Marek's disease (MD). The protection induced by CVI 988 grown in JBJ-1 cells and the combination of CVI 988 and HVT-FC126 both grown in JBJ-1 cells, amply complied with the requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia which prescribes that the protection index should be at least 80%. The safety of the vaccines grown in JBJ-1 cells was tested in a field study in commercial layer chickens. No signs of MD were noticed during the study and no other signs attributable to the vaccine. It is concluded that the JBJ-1 cell line is a suitable substrate for the current vaccines against MD.


Subject(s)
Chickens/virology , Fibroblasts/virology , Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid , Herpesvirus 2, Gallid , Marek Disease Vaccines , Marek Disease/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Cell Line, Transformed , Chick Embryo , Chickens/immunology , Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/growth & development , Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/immunology , Herpesvirus 2, Gallid/growth & development , Herpesvirus 2, Gallid/immunology , Marek Disease/immunology , Marek Disease/virology , Marek Disease Vaccines/administration & dosage , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Marek Disease Vaccines/immunology , Marek Disease Vaccines/therapeutic use , Poultry Diseases/immunology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Treatment Outcome , Turkeys/virology , Vaccination , Virus Cultivation
10.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 4(1): 77-88, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15757475

ABSTRACT

Marek's disease (MD) is an economically important neoplastic disease of poultry. MD almost devastated the poultry industry in the 1960s but the disease was brought under control after Marek's disease herpesvirus (MDV) was identified and vaccines were developed. This is the first effective use of an antiviral vaccination to prevent a naturally occurring cancer in any species. MDV infection has many effects. Initially causing a cytolytic infection in B-lymphocytes, MDV infects activated T-lymphocytes where it becomes latent. In susceptible chicken genotypes MDV transforms CD4+ lymphocytes, causing visceral lymphomas and/or neural lesions and paralysis. Fully productive infection and shedding of infectious virus only occurs in the feather-follicle epithelium. Vaccination of newly-hatched chicks with live vaccines has been widely used to successfully control MD since the early 1970s. However, vaccinated chickens still become infected and shed MDV. Vaccine breaks have occurred with regularity and there is evidence that the use of MD vaccines could be driving MDV to greater virulence. MD continues to be a threat and a number of strategies have been adopted such as the use of more potent vaccines and vaccination of the embryonic stage to provide earlier protection. Recombinant MD vaccines are useful vectors and are being exploited to carry both viral and host genes to enhance protective immune responses. The future aim must be to develop a sustainable vaccine strategy that does not drive MDV to increased virulence.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Mardivirus/pathogenicity , Marek Disease Vaccines/adverse effects , Marek Disease/prevention & control , Poultry/immunology , Vaccination/veterinary , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Animals , History, 20th Century , Mardivirus/immunology , Marek Disease/epidemiology , Marek Disease Vaccines/history , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccination/trends , Vaccines, Synthetic , Virulence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...