Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 439
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1356988, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841675

ABSTRACT

Background: As the most commonly used illicit substance, cannabis is gaining global acceptance through increasing legalization efforts. This shift intensifies the need for research to guide policymakers and healthcare providers in harm reduction and treatment strategies. Nonetheless, the relationship between psychopathological symptoms and cannabis use remains inadequately understood. Methods: A sample of regular cannabis consumers completed self-reported assessments for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD; Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale V1.1), and psychosis (Early Recognition Inventory based on IRAOS) as well as previous black-market cannabis use patterns. Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test Revised (CUDIT-R) was used to identify cannabis use disorder (CUD). To understand psychopathological symptom load related to cannabis consumption as well as cannabis use motives, multiple regression models were performed to identify psychopathological variables predicting cannabis use frequency and quantity. Linear regression and correlation analyses were conducted, adjusting for relevant covariates (age, gender, education, alcohol, other substance use). Results: Three-hundred-sixty regular cannabis users interested in a study on regulated cannabis access in Basel, Switzerland were examined. In bivariate analysis, cannabis use frequency correlated with depressive (r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.003) and anxiety symptom load (r(358) = 0.11, p = 0.034). Cannabis quantity correlated with depressive (r(358) = 0.15, p = 0.005), ADHD (r(358) = 0.14, p = 0.008), and psychosis symptom load (r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.002). However, in the adjusted regression models only depressive and ADHD symptom loads were significantly associated with cannabis use frequency (p = 0.006 and p = 0.034, respectively) and quantity (p = 0.037 and p = 0.019, respectively). No significant correlations between cannabis consumption and anxiety or psychosis remained after adjustment. Conclusion: ADHD and depressive symptoms correlate with increased cannabis use in a cohort of regular users, suggesting potential self-medication in nonclinical populations. With the rising availability of cannabis worldwide, these results highlight the necessity for longitudinal studies to disentangle the complex dynamics between cannabis consumption and mental health symptoms.


Subject(s)
Depression , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Cannabis , Middle Aged
2.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0304697, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Problematic Internet use is characterized by excessive use of online platforms that can result in social isolation, family problems, psychological distress, and even suicide. Problematic Internet use has been associated with cannabis use disorder, however knowledge on the adult population remains limited. In Quebec, cannabis use has significatively increased since 2018, and it is associated with various risks in public safety, public health, and mental health. This study aims to identify factors associated with problematic Internet use among adult cannabis users and to better understand their experiences. METHOD: This project is a mixed explanatory sequential study consisting of two phases. Phase 1 (n = 1500) will be a cross-sectional correlational study using probability sampling to examine variables that predispose individuals to problematic Internet use, characteristics associated with cannabis use, Internet use, and the mental health profile of adult cannabis users in Quebec. Descriptive analyses and regression models will be used to determine the relationship between cannabis use and Internet use. Phase 2 (n = 45) will be a descriptive qualitative study in the form of semi-structured interviews aimed at better understanding the experience and background of cannabis users with probable problematic Internet use. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will support the development of public policies and interventions for the targeted population, by formulating courses of action that contribute to the prevention and reduction of harms associated with cannabis use and problematic Internet use. Furthermore, an integrated knowledge mobilization plan will aid in the large-scale dissemination of information that can result useful to decision-makers, practitioners, members of the scientific community, and the general population regarding the use of cannabis and the Internet.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Humans , Quebec/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Internet , Young Adult , Adolescent , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Cannabis/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(9): 1357-1366, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711241

ABSTRACT

Background: Cannabis use and misuse is known to be associated with a variety of negative health, academic, and work-related outcomes; therefore, it is important to study the factors that contribute to or moderate its use. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether risky behavior, belongingness and social support as clustering variables play a role in cannabis use frequency. Method: In a university student sample, participant data on risky behavior, belongingness and social support were used to generate vulnerability profiles through cluster analysis (low vulnerability with low risk, low vulnerability with high belonging, moderate vulnerability, and high vulnerability). Using an analysis of variance, the vulnerability profiles were compared with respect to cannabis use frequency and quantity. Through chi-square tests we assessed whether these profiles are overrepresented in certain demographics. Results: The cluster analysis yielded four groups, which differed in their vulnerability for cannabis use. The most vulnerable cluster group had higher cannabis use frequency relative to the two least vulnerable groups. Low income vs. high income was also associated with high vulnerability group membership. International students were overrepresented in the low vulnerability with high belonging group relative to the low vulnerability with low-risk group. The opposite was observed for domestic students. Conclusions: This research adds to the expanding body of literature on cannabis use and misuse in Canada, which may contribute to public health policy and the prevention and treatment of cannabis addiction by providing new insight on who may be at risk.


Subject(s)
Risk-Taking , Social Support , Students , Humans , Male , Female , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Young Adult , Adult , Adolescent , Marijuana Use/psychology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Canada/epidemiology , Risk Factors
4.
Addict Behav ; 155: 108040, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657402

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined daily associations between alcohol use, cannabis use, and simultaneous alcohol and cannabis/marijuana (SAM) use with the likelihood of hooking up (uncommitted sexual encounter that may or may not include intercourse). METHOD: We used a longitudinal measurement burst ecological momentary assessment (EMA) design with 3-week EMA bursts with daily measurements repeated quarterly across 12 months. 1,009 (57 % female, Mean age = 20.00 [SD = 3.21]) Texan adolescents and young adults ages 15-25 participated in the study. Mixed effects logistic regression models were estimated using maximum likelihood estimation to evaluate the associations between substance use and hooking up. RESULTS: Within-person results indicated that participants were more likely to hook up on days with alcohol use and on days with cannabis use, but not on days with SAM use. Participants were also more likely to hook up on drinking days with higher-than-usual alcohol use. Between-person results indicated that participants who used alcohol more often or cannabis more often on average were more likely to hook up, and participants who tended to drink more on drinking days were more likely to hook up. CONCLUSIONS: Given the significant daily-level associations between alcohol and cannabis use and hooking up behavior, public health initiatives should focus on developing interventions to reduce alcohol and cannabis use and promote safer hooking up behavior among adolescents and young adults.


Subject(s)
Ecological Momentary Assessment , Marijuana Use , Humans , Adolescent , Female , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , United States/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Underage Drinking/statistics & numerical data , Underage Drinking/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Texas/epidemiology
5.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(9): 1303-1312, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With increases in cannabis use and potency, there is a need to improve our understanding of the impact of use on cognitive function. Previous research indicates long-term cannabis use may have a negative effect on executive function. Few studies have examined persistence of it in protracted abstinence, and there is limited evidence of predictors of worse cognitive function in current and former users. In this study, we aim to evaluate the associations between cannabis use status (current, former, and never use) and self-report cognition. Further, we investigate if cannabis use characteristics predict self-report cognitive function. METHODS: Cross-sectional cannabis use data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III), a national survey (N = 36,309) conducted in the USA between 2012 and 2013 were used alongside the Executive Function Index scales. The data were analyzed by using Ordinary Least Squares regression. RESULTS: Current (N = 3,681, Female = 37.7%) and former users (N = 7,448, Female = 45.4%) reported poorer cognition than never users (N = 24,956, Female = 56.6%). Self-reported cognition of former users was in-between that of current and never users. Several cannabis use characteristics were associated with self-reported cognition in current and former users. CONCLUSION: While prospective studies are required to confirm, findings suggest cannabis use is linked to worse cognition. There may be some limited recovery of cognition in former users and some cannabis use characteristics predict impairment. These findings add to our understanding of the cognitive impact of cannabis use. As worse cognitive function may impact relapse, findings have implications for personalization of cannabis use disorder treatment.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Self Report , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Executive Function , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology
6.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 258: 111266, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of the selective personality-targeted PreVenture program in reducing cannabis and stimulant use over a 7-year period spanning adolescence and early adulthood. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in 14 Australian schools. Schools were randomized to PreVenture, a brief personality-targeted selective intervention, comprising two 90-minute facilitator-led sessions delivered one week apart, or a control group (health education as usual). Only students who scored highly on one of four personality traits (anxiety sensitivity, negative thinking, impulsivity, sensation seeking) were included. Students completed online self-report questionnaires between 2012 and 2019: at baseline; post-intervention; 1-, 2-, 3-, 5.5- and 7-years post-baseline. Outcomes were past 6-months cannabis use, stimulant use (MDMA, methamphetamine or amphetamine) and cannabis-related harms. RESULTS: The sample comprised 438 adolescents (Mage=13.4 years; SD=0.47) at baseline. Retention ranged from 51% to 79% over the 7-years. Compared to controls, the PreVenture group had significantly reduced odds of annual cannabis-related harms (OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.65-0.92). However, there were no significant group differences in the growth of cannabis use (OR=0.84, 95% CI=0.69-1.02) or stimulant use (OR=1.07, 95% CI=0.91-1.25) over the 7-year period. CONCLUSIONS: PreVenture was effective in slowing the growth of cannabis-related harms over time, however owing to missing data over the 7-year trial, replication trials may be warranted to better understand the impact of the PreVenture intervention on cannabis and stimulant use among young Australians. Alternative implementation strategies, such as delivering the intervention in later adolescence and/or providing booster sessions, may be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Personality , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Australia , Students/psychology , Marijuana Use/psychology
7.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(8): 1141-1149, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555872

ABSTRACT

Background: Relations among attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), sleep, and substance-related negative consequences are largely unknown. In this cross-sectional study, we examined associations among ADHD diagnosis, sleep, and alcohol-related consequences. We also evaluated the independent and interactive effects of sleep and ADHD on alcohol-related negative consequences, above and beyond levels of alcohol use. Methods: College students who drink alcohol with (n = 51) and without (n = 50) ADHD completed an assessment that included a diagnostic interview assessing ADHD, and questionnaire measures of sleep quality, substance use, and associated consequences. Analyses utilized a series of hierarchical linear regression models and explored these aims for cannabis use in a subset of participants (n = 52 participants that used cannabis). Results: College students who drink alcohol with ADHD reported significantly worse sleep quality and more alcohol-related consequences, relative to those without ADHD. When ADHD and sleep quality were included in the model, ADHD-but not sleep quality-was independently associated with alcohol consequences, but not cannabis consequences. There were no moderating effects of ADHD on the associations between sleep and substance-related consequences. Conclusions: Students who drank alcohol with ADHD may be particularly vulnerable to experiencing poor sleep and consequences from their substance use, compared to their heavy drinking peers without ADHD. Future, larger scale studies should consider longitudinal effects as well as underlying mechanisms of risk.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Marijuana Use , Students , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Male , Female , Students/psychology , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Universities , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Sleep , Adolescent , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Adult , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking in College/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw ; 27(4): 261-267, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377604

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at exploring the association of nomophobia with alcohol, tobacco, and/or cannabis consumption among high school students. We carried out a cross-sectional study among high school and vocational training students in Galicia, Northwest Spain (N = 3,100). Collected data included nomophobia, sociodemographic variables, and alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis consumption. Nomophobia was measured using the validated Nomophobia Questionnaire. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using generalized linear mixed models. More than a quarter of the adolescents (27.7 percent) had nomophobia. We found an association between nomophobia and a high level of tobacco smoking in the last month in boys (OR = 2.16; 95 percent CI: 1.55-3.03). Nomophobia was also associated with higher odds of binge drinking in both genders (girls: OR = 1.86; 95 percent CI: 1.61-3.52; boys: OR = 2.29; 95 percent CI: 1.68-3.13) and with cannabis consumption in boys (OR = 1.74; 95 percent CI: 1.07-2.81). Our findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive investigation of the factors underlying alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis consumption in the adolescent population.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Female , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Tobacco Use/epidemiology , Tobacco Use/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Students/psychology , Phobic Disorders/epidemiology , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent Behavior/psychology
9.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 33(4): 435-445, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38407822

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine plans for postpartum cannabis use among pregnant individuals who used cannabis during early pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Eighteen virtual focus groups were conducted from November 17, 2021, to December 17, 2021, with 23 Black and 30 White pregnant adults in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, who self-reported prenatal cannabis use during early pregnancy. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The sample (N = 53) had a mean age of 30.3 years (standard deviation = 5.2) at recruitment; 70% reported daily, 25% weekly, and 6% ≤ monthly cannabis use at entrance to prenatal care. Some participants viewed cannabis as critical for coping with postpartum mental and physical health challenges, while others questioned whether cannabis use would fit with their parental lifestyle, and some planned to abstain altogether. Most planned to use cannabis postpartum, but with lower frequency than before pregnancy, and in ways consistent with harm reduction (e.g., smoking outside to avoid secondhand or thirdhand smoke exposure). Many were motivated to abstain from cannabis while breastfeeding, and some desired more data on the safety of cannabis and breastfeeding, or intended to "pump and dump," believing it would reduce potential transfer of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to their infant. Responses from Black and White participants were generally similar, but White participants were more likely to report plans to use cannabis while breastfeeding and to want information about cannabis and breastfeeding. Conclusions: Pregnant individuals with prenatal cannabis use had varied plans for cannabis use postpartum. Many were motivated to abstain or use cannabis less frequently than pre-pregnancy, especially during lactation.


Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Intention , Marijuana Smoking , Postpartum Period , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Postpartum Period/psychology , California , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Cannabis , Marijuana Use/psychology , Breast Feeding/psychology , Young Adult
10.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 50(2): 150-161, 2024 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285048

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of cannabis is highly prevalent during adolescence compared to the general adult population. In addition to the high comorbidity between cannabis use and anxiety disorders, early evidence suggests that cannabis may precede the development of anxiety. Moreover, adolescence represents a major developmental period for both neurobiological and psychological processes, placing these individuals at a heightened vulnerability to the influence of cannabis.Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prospective associations between adolescent cannabis use and subsequent anxiety outcomes (i.e. anxiety disorders and/or symptoms).Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted encompassing data from articles published between database inception and September 2022.Results: Six longitudinal studies were identified for quantitative analysis, while twelve non-overlapping longitudinal studies were identified for qualitative review (total N = 18; 33380 subjects). Meta-analytical findings supported an association between adolescent cannabis use and the development of a subsequent anxiety disorder (Odds Ratio = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.37-3.36, p < .01). These findings were consistent with our qualitative synthesis where nine of the twelve longitudinal studies observed a significant relationship between adolescent cannabis use and exacerbation of anxiety symptoms later in life, irrespective of an anxiety disorder diagnosis.Discussion: In summary, the current evidence suggests a prospective association between adolescent cannabis use and later anxiety symptoms and disorders. These findings underscore the importance of refining research methodologies, considering sex-based differences and controlling for confounding factors, as well as implementing educational initiatives and developing clinical interventions to address the mental health risks associated with cannabis use among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Marijuana Use , Humans , Adolescent , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies
11.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 160: 209293, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272122

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sexual minority individuals report significantly more cannabis use and problems than their heterosexual peers, possibly due to their frequent experiences with sexual orientation-based microaggressions. As a result, sexual minority individuals may turn to cannabis use to cope with the negative affect associated with these experiences. No known studies have tested this hypothesis; therefore, the current study tested if sexual orientation microaggressions are positively associated with negative affect (anxiety and depression), cannabis coping motives, and cannabis-related outcomes (frequency, problems); if coping motives are positively associated with cannabis-related outcomes; and if negative affect and cannabis use to cope with negative affect serially mediate the relation between sexual orientation microaggressions and cannabis-related outcomes. METHODS: Sexual minority undergraduate students who reported cannabis use in the past three months (N = 328; 71.3 % cis-female) completed an online survey. RESULTS: Microaggressions were significantly positively correlated with anxiety, depression, coping-motivated cannabis use, cannabis-related problems, non-sexual orientation-related stress, and overt sexual orientation-based discrimination. Additionally, after controlling for non-sexual orientation-related stress and overt sexual orientation-based discrimination, microaggressions were indirectly positively related to cannabis use frequency and problems via the sequential effects of negative affect and coping motives. This relation remained significant when examining negative affect specific to sexual orientation microaggressions and cannabis use to cope with this microaggressions-specific negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the adverse impact of sexual orientation microaggressions in terms of negative affect and negative cannabis-related outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety , Depression , Motivation , Sexual Behavior , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Humans , Female , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Male , Young Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Students/psychology , Adult , Adolescent , Affect , Marijuana Use/psychology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Aggression/psychology , Universities
12.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol ; 52(6): 877-889, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252334

ABSTRACT

Youth who are behaviorally aggressive and victimized by their peers comprise a significant population with specific risks and vulnerabilities relative to substance use. The goals of the current study were to examine the roles that youth aggression and peer victimization play in determining the timing of alcohol and marijuana use initiation and the frequency of use 5-years later in a sample of at-risk, aggressive youth. 360 youth (Mage= 10.17 years; 65% boys, 35% girls; 78.1% African American, 20.3% Caucasian, 1.4% Hispanic, and 0.3% other) recruited for a prevention program for at-risk youth were followed for 5 years (4th - 9th grade). Cox PH regressions were conducted to predict timing of alcohol and marijuana use initiation. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions were used to predict frequency of alcohol and marijuana use 5 years later. Results showed that peer victimization inferred decreased risk of alcohol use initiation. However, this effect was only observed for youth with relatively moderate, and low levels of aggression. Findings suggest that differences in youth aggression and victimization interact to predict distinct outcomes, suggesting the need for a more comprehensive approach when working with aggressive youth who have experienced peer victimization.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Aggression , Crime Victims , Marijuana Use , Peer Group , Underage Drinking , Humans , Female , Male , Aggression/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Crime Victims/psychology , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Child , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Underage Drinking/psychology , Underage Drinking/statistics & numerical data , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Bullying/psychology , Bullying/statistics & numerical data , Problem Behavior/psychology
13.
Subst Use Addctn J ; 45(1): 114-123, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258863

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined the risk perceptions related to driving after cannabis use (DACU) among Canadian and US adults who used cannabis in the past six months. METHODS: Perceptions of danger, normative beliefs, perceived likelihood of negative consequences, and other driving-related variables were collected via online surveys in Canadian (n = 158; 50.0% female, 84.8% White, mean age = 32.73 years [SD = 10.61]) and US participants (n = 678; 50.9% female, 73.6% White, mean age = 33.85 years [SD = 10.12]). Driving cognitions and DACU quantity/frequency were compared between samples using univariate analyses of variance, and Spearman's (ρ) correlations were performed to examine associations between driving cognitions and DACU quantity/frequency. RESULTS: The two samples did not significantly differ in self-reported level of cannabis use, lifetime quantity of DACU, or the number of times they drove within two hours of cannabis use in the past three months (Ps > .12). Compared to US participants, Canadians perceived driving within two hours of cannabis use as more dangerous (P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.013) and reported more of their friends would disapprove of DACU (P = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.006). There were no differences in the number of friends who would refuse to ride with a driver who had used cannabis (P = 0.15) or the perceived likelihood of negative consequences (Ps > 0.07). More favorable perceptions were significantly correlated with greater lifetime DACU and driving within two hours of use (ρ = 0.25-0.53, Ps < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal differences in distal risk factors for DACU between Canada and the US and may inform prevention efforts focusing on perceptions of risk and social acceptance of DACU.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Driving Under the Influence , Hallucinogens , Marijuana Use , North American People , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Canada/epidemiology , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists , North American People/psychology , North American People/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Attitude , Risk-Taking , Driving Under the Influence/psychology , Internet , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Marijuana Use/adverse effects , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology
14.
Addict Behav ; 150: 107909, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992453

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined age-varying associations between young adult simultaneous alcohol and marijuana/cannabis use (SAM) and heavy episodic drinking (HED) and positive and negative affect to inform harm reduction efforts. METHODS: Young adults reporting past-year alcohol use (n = 556; ages 19-25) were recruited in a state where alcohol and nonmedical cannabis use was legal for those 21 +. Participants provided 24 repeated monthly assessments. Among those reporting past-month cannabis use on at least one survey, logistic time-varying effect models estimated (1) the age-varying prevalence of and associations between past-month SAM and HED and (2) age-varying unique associations of affect with SAM and HED. RESULTS: There was a positive age-varying association between HED and SAM over time that was highest at age 19 (OR = 7.56), decreased until age 20.7 (OR = 3.39), increased until age 23.0 (OR = 4.85), and decreased until the association became non-significant by age 25. Negative affect was positively associated with SAM from ages 20.7 to 23.0, peaking at age 21.8 (OR = 1.36). Positive affect was positively associated with HED from ages 19.4 to 20.4 (peak OR = 1.25) and ages 22.5 to 24.5 (peak OR = 1.38). In contrast, positive affect was not uniquely associated with SAM nor negative affect with HED across ages 19-25. CONCLUSIONS: While HED and SAM were positively associated throughout young adulthood and interventions could target them in tandem, their associations with affect suggest differential etiologic processes. Preventive intervention and harm reduction efforts should attend to psychological context in which these behaviors occur.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Marijuana Smoking , Marijuana Use , Substance-Related Disorders , Young Adult , Humans , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Ethanol , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology
15.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci ; 133(1): 115-128, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use is associated with outcomes like income, legal problems, and psychopathology. This finding rests largely on correlational research designs, which rely at best on statistical controls for confounding. Here, we control for unmeasured confounders using a longitudinal study of twins. METHOD: In a sample of 4,078 American adult twins first assessed decades ago, we used cotwin control mixed effects models to evaluate the effect of lifetime average frequency of cannabis consumption measured on substance use, psychiatric, and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: On average, participants had a lifetime cannabis frequency of about one to two times per month, across adolescence and adulthood. As expected, in individual-level analyses, cannabis use was significantly associated with almost all outcomes in the expected directions. However, when comparing each twin to their cotwin, which inherently controls for shared genes and environments, we observed within-pair differences consistent with possible causality in three of the 22 assessed outcomes: cannabis use disorder symptoms (ßW-Pooled = .15, SE = .02, p = 1.7 × 10-22), frequency of tobacco use (ßW-Pooled = .06, SE = .01, p = 1.2 × 10-5), and illicit drug involvement (ßW-Pooled = .06, SE = .02, p = 1.2 × 10-4). Covariate specification curve analyses indicated that within-pair effects on tobacco and illicit drug use, but not cannabis use disorder, attenuated substantially when covarying for lifetime alcohol and tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS: The cotwin control results suggest that more frequent cannabis use causes small increases in cannabis use disorder symptoms, approximately 1.3 symptoms when going from a once-a-year use to daily use. For other outcomes, our results are more consistent with familial confounding, at least in this community population of twins. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Marijuana Abuse , Marijuana Use , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Cannabis , Illicit Drugs , Longitudinal Studies , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Twins , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Tobacco Use/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology
16.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol ; 32(3): 295-304, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127519

ABSTRACT

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder diagnoses continue to increase in United States college-aged students as more states legalize recreational cannabis. Previous studies have attempted to associate cannabis use with delay discount rates, which involves participants making choices for smaller sooner versus larger later hypothetical rewards. More smaller sooner choices result in higher discount rates and suggest increased impulsivity. Delay discounting studies have shown a significant, but small effect size with people who use cannabis more likely to choose the smaller sooner rewards, relative to people who do not use cannabis. The present study tested whether students with different experience using cannabis (people who currently use cannabis, people who formerly used cannabis, or people who never used cannabis) would be sensitive to sharing a proportion of hypothetical marijuana with another individual at a given social distance, as a putative measure for cannabis value. Results from two separate data sets showed that students classified as current cannabis users were significantly less likely to share a proportion of hypothetical marijuana across a range of social distances, relative to students that self-reported never using cannabis. Students classified as either former or current users were not statistically different. These results were consistent with previous delay discounting results and showed a medium effect size (η² ≥ 0.10) for each data set, both separately and when combined. These results indicate that social distance is a meaningful variable that can be used in a modified discounting task to assess differential cannabis value in a student population who are increasingly susceptible to cannabis use disorder. These results may have future clinical implications. Social discount rates for cannabis may be able to differentiate individuals who will continue recreational use versus individuals that may develop cannabis dependence problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Delay Discounting , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Cannabis , Adult , Marijuana Use/psychology , Impulsive Behavior , Choice Behavior , Reward , Social Behavior
17.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol ; 32(3): 316-328, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127518

ABSTRACT

This study examined day-level associations between trouble sleeping and three cannabis-use indices (likelihood/quantity of use and impaired control). We evaluated behavioral and cognitive mediators of the association between trouble sleeping and cannabis outcomes. Youth (N = 86, ages 15-24, 48.8% female, 58.8% White, 18.6% Latine) who regularly used cannabis were recruited for an intervention study. This preregistered secondary data analysis leveraged data from a 1-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study completed prior to intervention. Trouble sleeping, cannabis use, and impaired control over use were assessed each morning; negative affect, risk-taking propensity, and cannabis craving were assessed multiple times and aggregated to create a daily average. Multilevel structural equation modeling evaluated hypothesized temporally sequenced associations and putative mechanisms at the day (i.e., within) and person (i.e., between) level. In bivariate analyses at the person level, there were large-effect associations between trouble sleeping and craving and negative affect, and between craving and cannabis-use likelihood and quantity (rs from .34 to .48). In multilevel analyses at the day level, participants were less likely to use cannabis the next day after reporting more trouble sleeping (ß = -.65, p < .001). Trouble sleeping was not directly associated with subsequent cannabis-use quantity or impaired control, or indirectly via negative affect, risk-taking propensity, or craving. Trouble sleeping had differential relations with cannabis-use indices at the day and person levels. To promote youth health and reduce cannabis use, future research may consider the unique, person- and situation-driven mechanistic processes at play. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Craving , Ecological Momentary Assessment , Marijuana Use , Humans , Female , Male , Adolescent , Young Adult , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Risk-Taking , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology
18.
Addict Behav ; 149: 107908, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956543

ABSTRACT

Morning cannabis use is associated with heavier, frequent cannabis use and more cannabis-related negative consequences, yet little empirical research has examined its predictors. Using 24 months of longitudinal data, the present study tested demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral predictors of morning cannabis use among young adults at the monthly- and person-levels. Young adults (N = 778) were part of a larger study on substance use and social role transitions; participants completed a baseline survey and up to 24 consecutive monthly surveys. Hypotheses were tested using logistic multilevel models to estimate odds ratios for any vs. no morning use in a given month. At the monthly level, social anxiety motives and cannabis use frequency on a given month were positively associated with morning cannabis use. At the person level, typical coping motives, average cannabis use frequency, and male sex were positively associated with morning cannabis use. Findings advance our understanding of individual and psychosocial predictors of morning cannabis use among young adults. Notably, social anxiety motives may represent a malleable target for intervention efforts that could reduce risky use patterns associated with morning use. Such efforts may be especially prudent for young men, as our findings indicated morning cannabis use probabilities were much higher for men than women.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Marijuana Abuse , Marijuana Smoking , Marijuana Use , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Motivation , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological
19.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(5): 680-689, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108303

ABSTRACT

Background: Psychological distress (i.e., incipient symptoms of anxiety, stress, and depression) may promote substance use through increased emission of cognitive distortions. These are automatic irrational thoughts that can promote distress, which in turn increases substance use. Aim: This study analyzed, in a sample of Uruguayan citizens, the unique contribution of cognitive distortions on the frequency and quantity of alcohol or marijuana use, over and above the contribution of psychological distress or the use of emotion regulation strategies. We also assessed whether these variables were associated with having initiated or resumed the use of a substance. Methods: A survey asked about alcohol and marijuana use, psychological distress, emotion regulation strategies, and cognitive distortions. The study comprised a convenience sample of 1132 participants (Mean age = 29.07 ± 8.19 years, 72.26% women). Separate hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted on the frequency and quantity of alcohol or marijuana use, whereas a logistic regression was applied on having initiated or resumed the use of a substance. Results: Several cognitive distortions were significant predictors of frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption or frequency of marijuana use, over and above psychological distress. Differential emission of automatic thoughts was also associated, along with higher scores of psychological distress, with a significantly higher probability of having initiated the use of a new substance or having resumed the use of a substance. Conclusions: Cognitive distortions may promote alcohol and marijuana use. Interventions aimed at modifying these distortions should be considered to reduce the emission of these behaviors.


Subject(s)
Marijuana Smoking , Marijuana Use , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Marijuana Use/psychology , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Cognition
20.
Ars pharm ; 64(4): 348-358, oct.-dic. 2023.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-225994

ABSTRACT

Los problemas de salud mental hacen parte de las enfermedades no trasmisibles y se les atribuye, con otras enfermedades asociados al bienestar, hasta un 21 % de las muertes mundiales. Por ello, es necesario analizar y establecer la relación riesgo/beneficio de políticas relacionadas con la salud mental, caso de la legalización del consumo de cannabis recreativo en adultos. El cannabis es la droga “ilícita” de mayor consumo en los países occidentales, en esencia por incrementar la sociabilidad y la euforia. En la última década, varios países han promulgado normas orientadas a legalizar la comercialización de cannabis recreativo en adultos. En este sentido, existe controversia del efecto de este tipo de iniciativas, en el porcentaje de personas que consumen esta sustancia y en la salud de los mismos. Sin embargo, se podría esperar que este tipo de iniciativas favorezca un aumento en el porcentaje de personas que consumen esta sustancia. El aumento del consumo de marihuana puede favorecer una mayor prevalencia de problemas de salud mental, incluyendo psicosis y esquizofrenia. Se acepta la existencia de una asociación entre consumo de cannabis y psicosis (incluyendo esquizofrenia). En este marco, reconociendo los beneficios de las políticas de legalización del consumo de cannabis recreativo en adultos, orientadas a superar el enfoque prohibicionista y a buscar la reducción del daño, es conveniente evaluar y definir el efecto de las mismas. Además, estas iniciativas se deben acompañar de programas informativos y educativos, orientados a sintetizar los riesgos del consumo, incluyendo, la dependencia y problemas de salud mentales. (AU)


Mental health problems are included in the non-communicable diseases and together to other problems associated with well-being, they are attributed up to 21 % of global deaths. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze and establish the risk/benefit ratio of policy related to mental health, for example, in the case of the legalization of recreational cannabis use in adults. Cannabis is the most widely used “illicit” drug in Western countries, essentially because it increases sociability and euphoria. In the last decade, several countries have endorsed policies aimed at legalizing the commercialization of recreational cannabis in adults. In this sense, there is controversy about the effect of this type of policy on the percentage of people who consume this substance and on their health. However, it could be expected that this type of initiative will improve the percentage of people who consume this substance. Increased marijuana use may lead to a higher prevalence of mental health problems, including psychosis and schizophrenia. The existence of an association between cannabis use and psychosis (including schizophrenia) is accepted. In this framework, recognizing the benefits of policies to legalize the use of recreational cannabis in adults, advancing from a drug prohibition approach to one focused on harm reduction, it is convenient to evaluate and define the effect of this type of policies. Also, this kind of policies should be linked to informative and educational programs to clarify the risks of consumption, including, dependence and mental health problems. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Mental Health , Policy , Marijuana Use/adverse effects , Marijuana Use/legislation & jurisprudence , Marijuana Use/psychology , Cannabis , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Health Education , Substance-Related Disorders
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...