Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 373
Filter
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 148(2): 459-465, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398100

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Social media are a powerful tool that creates a unique opportunity for the young plastic surgeon and trainee to share content, brand oneself, educate the public, and develop one's own professional voice early. The majority of all plastic surgery programs and particularly those that are highly ranked have social media opportunities for their residents, yet clear rules to guide implementation of social media programming in residency have remained unspecified. These guidelines and pitfalls can be used to inform a productive and professional entry into plastic surgery social media use for the resident and young plastic surgeon. Details regarding specific platform use to maximize exposure are provided. The core principles of patient safety and privacy, authentic photography, plastic surgery education and advocacy, and professionalism inform these guidelines. Pitfalls include establishment of an online physician-patient relationship, engaging in debate by means of online reviews, providing medical entertainment, and engaging in non-plastic surgery politics. Use of these guidelines will allow the young plastic surgeon and trainee to succeed by means of social media platforms in an ethical and professional manner.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Social Media/standards , Surgeons/standards , Surgery, Plastic/standards , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Marketing of Health Services/methods , Marketing of Health Services/standards , Patient Education as Topic/ethics , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Professionalism , Plastic Surgery Procedures/economics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/education , Social Media/ethics , Surgeons/economics , Surgery, Plastic/economics
7.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 145(5): 988e-996e, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332557

ABSTRACT

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify the key social media platforms to use. 2. Recall the primary components of the code of conduct when using social media. 3. Recognize how to build a social media presence and brand. 4. Summarize the primary applications of social media in plastic surgery. SUMMARY: Social media are a growing new tool that has emerged in recent years, with numerous applications that have allowed for an effective means to rapidly disseminate information. Plastic surgeons must gain an understanding of the technology to both grow their practices and the specialty as a whole in an ethical and responsible way. The different platforms available; code of conduct; how to build a social media presence; and the main applications of advertising, education, and research, as based on evidence-based recommendations, are presented.


Subject(s)
Communication , Social Media , Surgeons/psychology , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Codes of Ethics , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Marketing of Health Services/methods , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Selection , Research Design , Surgeons/economics , Surgeons/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/economics , Surgery, Plastic/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/trends
12.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 311(10): 833-835, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321506

ABSTRACT

Recently, stem cells in aesthetics have attracted increased attention, especially as they have become a popular trend that is being mass-marketed to consumers on the Internet and social media. Unfortunately, studies have shown this marketing to be misleading as it portrays many purported benefits of stem cells that have yet to be proven in the limited studies that are available. It is important for clinicians to understand the evidence and marketing behind any new trends, especially in the fast-paced world of aesthetics, where treatments often outpace current medical understanding. As clinicians, we have bioethical and professional obligations to educate ourselves on current trends, ensure adequate patient safety, and advocate for continued consumer education.


Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , Cosmetic Techniques/ethics , Dermatology/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Stem Cell Transplantation/ethics , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/economics , Dermatology/economics , Dermatology/methods , Esthetics , Evidence-Based Medicine/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/ethics , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Safety , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Stem Cell Transplantation/economics
14.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(5): 1533-1539, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033838

ABSTRACT

Similar to the outcry over the ethics of website marketing by physicians in the 1990s, the resistance to plastic surgeons' use of social media has been loud and vehement. Many physicians, although receptive to website marketing, view social media as too radical or unprofessional. Despite the controversy, the value of social media as a communication tool for interacting with and educating patients is supported by studies showing that 65 percent of Americans and 90 percent of young adults use social media. Many plastic surgeons have been early adopters, as reflected by the articles written to help board-certified plastic surgeons use social media in academic medicine and for their practice. However, there is little guidance for young plastic surgeons who wish to use social media for professional purposes. In this study, the authors discuss the ethics and current literature on social media use by young plastic surgeons and make recommendations for how to use social media during training and after residency graduation.


Subject(s)
Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/ethics , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Marketing of Health Services/standards , Marketing of Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Social Media/ethics , Societies, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies, Medical/standards , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surgery, Plastic/legislation & jurisprudence , Surgery, Plastic/standards , Surgery, Plastic/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Federal Trade Commission/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Bioethics ; 32(9): 602-610, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30194688

ABSTRACT

Cosmetic dentistry is a divisive discipline. Within discourses that raise questions of the purpose of the dental profession, cosmetic dentistry is frequently criticised on the basis of it being classified as a non-therapeutic intervention. This article re-evaluates this assertion through examination of ethics of care of the self, healthcare definitions and the social purpose of dentistry, finding the traditional position to be wanting in its conclusions. The slide of dentistry from a healthcare vocation towards being a predominantly business-focused interaction between clinician and consumer conflicts with traditional notions of dentistry as a profession. Whilst it is undeniable that cosmetic dental treatment particularly lends itself to the commercial paradigm, this is not exclusive to this area of professional practice. The cultural basis of dental appearance and the potential of the dental profession to exert coercive pressure upon the public to undergo treatment that is based upon social norms is discussed. This essay concludes that cosmetic dentistry is undeniably part of the professional purpose of 21st Century dentistry. However, the caveat that may be placed upon this, is that this status is conditional upon the professional conduct of dental practitioners remaining resilient to commercial practices not compatible with professional obligations.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/ethics , Dentists/ethics , Esthetics, Dental , Ethics, Dental , Professionalism/ethics , American Dental Association , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Social Responsibility , United States
16.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 25: 133-138, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29779808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multi-level marketing (MLM) of nutrition products has experienced dramatic growth in recent decades. 'Wellness' is the second most popular niche in the MLM industry and represents 35% of sales among all the products in 2016. This category includes dietary supplements, weight management and sports nutrition products. The aim of this paper is to analyse whether this practice is legal and ethical. METHODS: An analysis of available documentary information about the legal aspects of Multi-level marketing business was performed. Ethical reflexion was based on the "principlism" approach. RESULTS: We argue that, while being a controversial business model, MLM is not fraudulent from a legal point of view. However, it is an unethical strategy obviating all the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy. What is at stake is the possible economic scam and the potential harm those products could cause due to unproven efficacy, exceeding daily nutrient requirements and potential toxicity. The sale of dietary and nutrition supplements products by physicians and dieticians presents a conflict of interests that can undermine the primary obligation of physicians to serve the interests of their patients before their own. CONCLUSION: While considering that MLM of dietary supplements and other nutrition products are a legal business strategy, we affirm that it is an unethical practice. MLM products that have nutritional value or promoted as remedies may be unnecessary and intended for conditions that are unsuitable for self-prescription as well.


Subject(s)
Commerce/ethics , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Dietary Supplements , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/ethics , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Business , Food Industry/ethics , Food Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Marketing of Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Conflict of Interest/legislation & jurisprudence , Fraud/ethics , Fraud/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Humans , Policy Making , Truth Disclosure/ethics
19.
AMA J Ethics ; 20(4): 372-378, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671731

ABSTRACT

Advertising a plastic surgery practice on social media is fraught with both practical and ethical challenges. We use an institutional betrayalframework to explore the range of potential harms to patient well-being while also considering the pitfalls of social media activity, especially marketing, for practitioners. We also give consideration to the relative benefits that such online patient-clinician relationships can provide. In our analysis, we draw on specific examples of plastic surgery procedures prominently featured on social media, including the Vampire Facelift®.


Subject(s)
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/ethics , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Social Media/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/ethics , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cosmetic Techniques/standards , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/methods , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/standards
20.
AMA J Ethics ; 20(4): 379-383, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671732

ABSTRACT

Plastic surgeons have evolved their methods of reaching potential patients by using various forms of social media. Such platforms can educate, inform, and, for some, entertain. Social media now allows consumers to compare themselves to a much wider, if not global, set of peers that might further exacerbate their anxiety regarding their appearance. Plastic surgeons should ensure that use of patient images does not violate privacy or create unreasonable expectations about the results that can be obtained; nor should plastic surgeons' marketing objectify women. Professionalism on the part of plastic surgeons, along with the utmost respect for patients, must remain paramount.


Subject(s)
Marketing of Health Services/ethics , Professionalism/ethics , Social Media/ethics , Surgeons/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/ethics , Attitude of Health Personnel , Blogging/ethics , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...