Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 126.642
Filter
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 300, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702643

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complex social determinants of health may not be easily recognized by health care providers and pose a unique challenge in the vulnerable pediatric population where patients may not be able to advocate for themselves. The goal of this study was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of health care providers using an integrated brief pediatric screening tool in primary care and hospital settings. METHODS: The framework of the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) and Pediatric Intermed tools was used to inform the selection of items for the 9-item Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths-Pediatric Complexity Indicator (CANS-PCI). The tool consisted of three domains: biological, psychological, and social. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care providers in pediatric medical facilities in Ottawa, Canada. A low inference and iterative thematic synthesis approach was used to analyze the qualitative interview data specific to acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: Thirteen health care providers participated in interviews. Six overarching themes were identified: acceptability, logistics, feasibility, pros/cons, risk, and privacy. Overall, participants agreed that a routine, trained provider-led pediatric tool for the screening of social determinants of health is important (n = 10, 76.9%), acceptable (n = 11; 84.6%), and feasible (n = 7, 53.8%). INTERPRETATION: Though the importance of social determinants of health are widely recognized, there are limited systematic methods of assessing, describing, and communicating amongst health care providers about the biomedical and psychosocial complexities of pediatric patients. Based on this study's findings, implementation of a brief provider-led screening tool into pediatric care practices may contribute to this gap.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Mass Screening , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Child , Mass Screening/methods , Female , Male , Adolescent , Primary Health Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Qualitative Research , Interviews as Topic , Pediatrics
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 584, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702743

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Youth healthcare has an important role in promoting a healthy lifestyle in young children in order to prevent lifestyle-related health problems. To aid youth healthcare in this task, a new lifestyle screening tool will be developed. The aim of this study was to explore how youth healthcare professionals (YHCP) could best support parents in improving their children's lifestyle using a new lifestyle screening tool for young children. METHODS: We conducted four and seven focus groups among parents (N = 25) and YHCP (N = 25), respectively. Two main topics were addressed: the experiences with current practice of youth healthcare regarding lifestyle in young children, and the requirements for the lifestyle screening tool to be developed. The focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Both parents and YHCP indicated that young children's lifestyles are often discussed during youth healthcare appointments. While parents felt that this discussion could be more in-depth, YHCP mainly needed clues to continue the discussion. According to parents and YHCP, a new lifestyle screening tool for young children should be easy to use, take little time and provide courses of action. Moreover, it should be attractive to complete and align with the family concerned. CONCLUSIONS: According to parents and YHCP, a new lifestyle screening tool for young children could be useful to discuss specific lifestyle topics in more detail and to provide targeted advice.


Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Parents , Humans , Female , Parents/psychology , Male , Child , Child, Preschool , Life Style , Adult , Mass Screening/methods , Health Personnel/psychology
4.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 153, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesize high-quality information to support evidence-based clinical practice. In primary care, numerous CPGs must be integrated to address the needs of patients with multiple risks and conditions. The BETTER program aims to improve prevention and screening for cancer and chronic disease in primary care by synthesizing CPGs into integrated, actionable recommendations. We describe the process used to harmonize high-quality cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) CPGs to update the BETTER program. METHODS: A review of CPG databases, repositories, and grey literature was conducted to identify international and Canadian (national and provincial) CPGs for CCDPS in adults 40-69 years of age across 19 topic areas: cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hepatitis C, obesity, osteoporosis, depression, and associated risk factors (i.e., diet, physical activity, alcohol, cannabis, drug, tobacco, and vaping/e-cigarette use). CPGs published in English between 2016 and 2021, applicable to adults, and containing CCDPS recommendations were included. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and a three-step process involving patients, health policy, content experts, primary care providers, and researchers was used to identify and synthesize recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 51 international and Canadian CPGs and 22 guidelines developed by provincial organizations that provided relevant CCDPS recommendations. Clinical recommendations were extracted and reviewed for inclusion using the following criteria: 1) pertinence to primary prevention and screening, 2) relevance to adults ages 40-69, and 3) applicability to diverse primary care settings. Recommendations were synthesized and integrated into the BETTER toolkit alongside resources to support shared decision-making and care paths for the BETTER program. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive care requires the ability to address a person's overall health. An approach to identify high-quality clinical guidance to comprehensively address CCDPS is described. The process used to synthesize and harmonize implementable clinical recommendations may be useful to others wanting to integrate evidence across broad content areas to provide comprehensive care. The BETTER toolkit provides resources that clearly and succinctly present a breadth of clinical evidence that providers can use to assist with implementing CCDPS guidance in primary care.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Primary Prevention , Humans , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Canada , Mass Screening/standards , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/diagnosis
5.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1321253, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711762

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Women's adherence to the United States (U.S.) Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for cervical cancer screening was determined by examining predisposing, enabling, and needs factors from Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use conceptual framework. Methods: The outcome was operationalized as cervical cancer screening use, non-use, and inadequate-use. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted on data from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey of 7,331 eligible women aged 21-65. Results: Compared with women who used cervical cancer screening services, women aged 30-65 were less likely to be Non-Users than those aged 21-29. Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) women were more likely to be Non-Users than White women. More educated women were less likely to be Non-Users. Foreign-born women <10 years in the U.S. were more likely to be Non-Users than U.S.-born women. Women with financial hardship were less likely to be Non-Users. Poorer women and uninsured women were more likely to be Non-Users. Women with children in their household were less likely to be Non-Users than those without children. Women who had a well-visit in the past year were less likely to be Non-Users. Women with a history of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination were less likely to be Non-Users. Compared with women who used cervical cancer screening services, women aged 30-65 were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. AIAN women were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women of other races were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Employed women were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Uninsured women were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women who had a well-visit within a year were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women with past HPV vaccination were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Smokers were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Discussion: Predisposing, enabling, and needs factors are differently associated with non-use and inadequate use of cervical cancer screening. Understanding factors associated with the use, non-use, and inadequate use of cervical cancer screening is crucial to avoid or curb unnecessary tests, increased costs to both society and individuals, and the ill-allocation of limited resources.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , United States , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data
8.
JACC Heart Fail ; 12(5): 836-838, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719384
9.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(5): 600-603, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720223

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is a relationship between the 2nd finger and 4th finger length measurement ratios and developmental dysplasia of the Hip (DDH). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Meram Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, from January 2020 to May 2023. METHODOLOGY: Infants were screened for DDH with Graff method for the ultrasounds of both hips. Lengths of the 2nd and 4th fingers of both hands were measured and recorded. Patients with additional risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (breech birth, family history, oligohydramnios, swaddling) were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six babies were screened including 55.1% (n = 141) girls and 44.9% (n = 115) boys. Their mean age was 2.51 ± 0.80 months. The average lengths were 31.73 ± 3.05 mm, for the left 2nd finger and 34.26 ± 3.48 mm for the left 4th finger. In the hip USG measurements, the mean alpha angles were 62.91 ± 3.12° for the right hip and, 63.20 ± 3.55° for the left hip. Eighteen (7%) of babies who underwent hip ultrasound (USG) had unilateral or bilateral DDH. Among these cases, 2.7% (n = 7) had right, 2.3% (n = 6) had left, and 2% (n = 5) had bilateral DDH. There was no statistically significant correlation between the ratios of right 2/4 finger lengths and the right alpha angle (rs = 0.051; p = 0.421). There was a statistically positive and statistically significant correlation between the ratios of left 2/4 finger lengths and the left alpha angle (rs = 0.154; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Only the left-hand finger ratio among the parameters in the model had a statistically significant effect on DDH. Therefore, the left hand 2D/4D finger length may be of value in screening for DDH. KEY WORDS: Developmental dysplasia of the hip, Second to fourth finger digit ratio, Ring finger, Digit ratios.


Subject(s)
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Fingers , Ultrasonography , Humans , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/diagnostic imaging , Fingers/abnormalities , Fingers/diagnostic imaging , Fingers/anatomy & histology , Infant , Neonatal Screening/methods , Infant, Newborn , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnosis , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods
10.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1206, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a leading cause of disability in people older than 65 years worldwide. However, diagnosing dementia in its earliest symptomatic stages remains challenging. This study combined specific questions from the AD8 scale with comprehensive health-related characteristics, and used machine learning (ML) to construct diagnostic models of cognitive impairment (CI). METHODS: The study was based on the Shenzhen Healthy Ageing Research (SHARE) project, and we recruited 823 participants aged 65 years and older, who completed a comprehensive health assessment and cognitive function assessments. Permutation importance was used to select features. Five ML models using BalanceCascade were applied to predict CI: a support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), AdaBoost, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and logistic regression (LR). An AD8 score ≥ 2 was used to define CI as a baseline. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the results of ML models. RESULTS: The first and sixth items of AD8, platelets, waist circumference, body mass index, carcinoembryonic antigens, age, serum uric acid, white blood cells, abnormal electrocardiogram, heart rate, and sex were selected as predictive features. Compared to the baseline (AUC = 0.65), the MLP showed the highest performance (AUC: 0.83 ± 0.04), followed by AdaBoost (AUC: 0.80 ± 0.04), SVM (AUC: 0.78 ± 0.04), GBDT (0.76 ± 0.04). Furthermore, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of four ML models were higher than the baseline. SHAP summary plots based on MLP showed the most influential feature on model decision for positive CI prediction was female sex, followed by older age and lower waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic models of CI applying ML, especially the MLP, were substantially more effective than the traditional AD8 scale with a score of ≥ 2 points. Our findings may provide new ideas for community dementia screening and to promote such screening while minimizing medical and health resources.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Machine Learning , Mass Screening , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , China , Dementia/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis
11.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 43, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708402

ABSTRACT

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an ultra-rare inherited condition that affects approximately one in 300,000 people. The disorder is characterized by extremely high, life-threatening levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from birth, leading to significant premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, if left untreated. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is severely underdiagnosed and undertreated in the United States (US), despite guidelines recommendations for universal pediatric lipid screening in children aged 9-11. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are critical in averting premature cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by HoFH. Yet, an unacceptably high number of people living with HoFH remain undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and/or receive a late diagnosis, often after a major cardiovascular event. The emergence of novel lipid-lowering therapies, along with the realization that diagnosis is too often delayed, have highlighted an urgency to implement policies that ensure timely detection of HoFH in the US. Evidence from around the world suggests that a combination of universal pediatric screening and cascade screening strategies constitutes an effective approach to identifying heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Nevertheless, HoFH and its complications manifest much earlier in life compared to HeFH. To date, little focus has been placed on the detection of HoFH in very young children and/or infants. The 2023 Updated European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on HoFH has recommended, for the first time, broadening pediatric guidelines to include lipid screening of newborn infants. Some unique aspects of HoFH need to be considered before implementing newborn screening. As such, insights from pilot studies conducted in Europe may provide some preliminary guidance. Our paper proposes a set of actionable measures that states can implement to reduce the burden of HoFH. It also outlines key research and policy gaps that need to be addressed in order to pave the way for universal newborn screening of HoFH in the US.


Subject(s)
Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Child , Humans , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Homozygote , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/epidemiology , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Mass Screening/methods , Neonatal Screening/methods , United States/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn
12.
Lipids Health Dis ; 23(1): 136, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common autosomal dominant diseases. FH causes a lifelong increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, which in turn leads to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The incidence of FH is widely underestimated and undertreated, despite the availability and effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy. Patients with FH have an increased cardiovascular risk; therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are vital. To address the burden of FH, several countries have implemented national FH screening programmes. The currently used method for FH detection in Lithuania is mainly based on opportunistic testing with subsequent cascade screening of index cases' first-degree relatives. METHODS: A total of 428 patients were included in this study. Patients with suspected FH are referred to a lipidology center for thorough evaluation. Patients who met the criteria for probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) scoring system and/or had LDL-C > = 6.5 mmol/l were subjected to genetic testing. Laboratory and instrumental tests, vascular marker data of early atherosclerosis, and consultations by other specialists, such as radiologists and ophthalmologists, were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 127/428 (30%) patients were genetically tested. FH-related mutations were found in 38.6% (n = 49/127) of the patients. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was diagnosed in 13% (n = 57/428) of the included patients, whereas premature CAD was found in 47/428 (11%) patients. CAD was diagnosed in 19% (n = 9/49) of patients with FH-related mutations, and this diagnosis was premature for all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in this study were classified as probable or possible FH without difference of age and sex. The median age of FH diagnosis was 47 years with significantly older females than males, which refers to the strong interface of this study with the LitHir programme. CAD and premature CAD were more common among patients with probable and definite FH, as well as those with an FH-causing mutation. The algorithm described in this study is the first attempt in Lithuania to implement a specific tool which allows to maximise FH detection rates, establish an accurate diagnosis of FH, excluding secondary causes of dyslipidaemia, and to select patients for cascade screening initiation more precisely.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Cholesterol, LDL , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Receptors, LDL , Humans , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/epidemiology , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/blood , Lithuania/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Receptors, LDL/genetics , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Genetic Testing/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Aged , Mutation , Proprotein Convertase 9/genetics , Proprotein Convertase 9/blood
13.
Croat Med J ; 65(2): 85-92, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706234

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify diabetic patients with a potential risk of developing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in community pharmacies in Slovakia using a modified Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq-12). METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 703 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus who had not been diagnosed with DPN. The study took place in selected community pharmacies across Slovakia in October 2019. The MNSIq-12 was administered by pharmacy students, and a Michigan score <1.5 was considered risky. The groups divided based on the Michigan score were compared in terms of duration of diabetes, age, body mass index (BMI), sex, weekly physical activity, level of education, and smoking. RESULTS: The risk of developing DPN was detected in 6.6% of respondents with type 1 diabetes and 13.4% with type 2 diabetes. Patients with both types of diabetes (38.2%; 67.0%) reported fatigue and heaviness in the legs as the most common clinical symptoms that may indicate the development of DPN. Those with a Michigan score <1.5 were older (P<0.0001), had a higher BMI (P<0.0001), a lower level of education (P=0.0020), and were less physically active (P<0.0001). Conclusion Approximately one-eighth of patients with diabetes who visited community pharmacies were potentially at risk for developing DPN. The modified MNSIq-12 was shown to be a simple, time-effective, and non-invasive indicative screening tool that can be applied in the environment of community pharmacies.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Neuropathies , Humans , Slovakia/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Diabetic Neuropathies/diagnosis , Diabetic Neuropathies/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Mass Screening/methods , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Aged , Risk Factors , Body Mass Index
14.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 13(1): 39, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migrants, mainly undocumented and low-income refugees, are at high risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but are a difficult-to-reach and to-treat population. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a test and treat model with direct-acting antiviral for HCV infection in these migrants coming from low-income and living in southern Italy. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, collaborative study based on a four-phase-program (educational counseling, screening, linkage-to-care and treatment) was designed in southern Italy; the study started in June 2018, was stopped in February 2020 because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV2 infection in Italy and was resumed in February 2021 until November 2021. After educational counseling on infectious diseases that are transmitted through blood or sexually pseudonymized HCV screening was offered to all undocumented migrants and low-income refugees observed at one of the 1st level clinical centers. The HCV-RNA-positive subjects were referred to one of the 3rd level units of Infectious Diseases (ID) and treated with a 12-week course of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and observed for 12 weeks after the end of direct antiviral agents (DAA) treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For the descriptive analysis, the categorical variables were reported as absolute numbers and relative frequencies. Continuous variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as a median and interquartile range (IQR) if not normally distributed. We used Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0. RESULTS: Of the 3501migrants observed in the study period, 3417 (97.6%) agreed to be screened; 185 (4.7%) were anti-HCV-positive and, of these, 53 (28.6%) were HCV-RNA-positive. Of these 53 subjects, 48 (90.5%) were referred to an ID unit and started DAA treatment. The HCV-RNA-positive-subjects were older [median 36 years (IQR: 32-21) vs 27.19 (IQR: 30.5-19.25); P = 0.001], and less frequently males [35 (66.03 %) vs 119 (90.1%), P < 0 .0001] than seronegative participants. They more frequently came from Eastern Europe (70.8%) stayed longer in Italy [months of stay in Italy, mean ± SD: 51.02 ± 52.84 vs 25.7 ± 42.65, P = 0.001], and had more years of schooling [years of schooling, mean ± SD: 9.61±2.81 vs 7.10 ± 4, P = 0.0001]. HCV-RNA-positive-subjects less frequently reported piercing, tattoos and tribal scars as risk factors (23.6%). Of these 48 HCV RNA positive subjects who started DAA, 47 (97.9%) showed a sustained virological response and one dropped-out in follow-up after DAA treatment. No subject had any adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: This model of HCV screening and linkage to care seems effective to eliminate HCV infectionin a difficult-to-reach and to-treat population, such as undocumented migrants and low-income refugees. The participation of cultural mediators in the study made possible a better interaction between migrants and physicians, as is evident from the large number of subjects enrolled. Eliminating HCV among migrants will have a long-term positive impact from a public health and healthcare perspective by reducing the number of individuals who potentially develop HCV-related complications such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and reducing the circulation of HCV in the regions that host them which often, as in the case of Italy, are low endemic for HCV infection.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Hepatitis C , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/virology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Mass Screening , Refugees , Poverty
15.
Ann Fam Med ; 22(3): 208-214, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806260

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly interrupted breast cancer screening, an essential preventive service in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the pandemic's impact on overall and follow-up breast cancer screening using real-world health records data. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of women eligible for breast cancer screening through the study period from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2022 using TriNetX Research Network data. We examined the temporal trend of monthly screening volume throughout the study period and compared the rate of adherence to follow-up screening within 24 months after the previous screening when the follow-up screening was due in the pre-COVID period vs the COVID period. To account for multiple screenings in the longitudinal data, we applied a logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations with adjustment for individual-level covariates. RESULTS: Among 1,186,669 screening-eligible women, the monthly screening volume temporarily decreased by 80.6% from February to April 2020 and then rebounded to close to pre-COVID levels by June 2020. Yet, the follow-up screening rate decreased from 78.9% (95% CI, 78.8%-79.0%) in the pre-COVID period to 77.7% (95% CI, 77.6%-77.8%) in the COVID period. Multivariate regression analysis also showed a lower adherence to follow-up screening during the COVID period (odds ratio = 0.86; 0.86-0.87) and a greater pandemic impact among women aged 65 years and older and women of non-Hispanic "other" race (Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had a transient negative effect on breast cancer screening overall and a prolonged negative effect on follow-up screening. It also exacerbated gaps in adherence to follow-up screening, especially among certain vulnerable groups, requiring innovative strategies to address potential health disparities in primary care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods
17.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e082350, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806433

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radiologist shortages threaten the sustainability of breast cancer screening programmes. Artificial intelligence (AI) products that can interpret mammograms could mitigate this risk. While previous studies have suggested this technology has accuracy comparable to radiologists most have been limited by using 'enriched' datasets and/or not considering the interaction between the algorithm and human readers. This study will address these limitations by comparing the accuracy of a workflow using AI alongside radiologists on a large consecutive cohort of examinations from a breast cancer screening programme. The study will combine the strengths of a large retrospective design with the benefit of prospective data collection. It will test this technology without risk to screening programme participants nor the need to wait for follow-up data. With a sample of 2 years of consecutive screening examinations, it is likely the largest test of this technology to date. The study will help determine whether this technology can safely be introduced into the BreastScreen New South Wales (NSW) population-based screening programme to address radiology workforce risks without compromising cancer detection rates or increasing false-positive recalls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A retrospective, consecutive cohort of digital mammography screens from 658 207 examinations from BreastScreen NSW will be reinterpreted by the Lunit Insight MMG AI product. The cohort includes 4383 screen-detected and 1171 interval cancers. The results will be compared with radiologist single reading and the AI results will also be used to replace the second reader in a double-reading model. New adjudication reading will be performed where the AI disagrees with the first reader. Recall rates and cancer detection rates of combined AI-radiologist reading will be compared with the rates obtained at the time of screening. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the NSW Health Population Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH02397). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. The findings of this evaluation will be provided to programme managers, governance bodies and other stakeholders in Australian breast cancer screening programmes.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Mammography , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Mammography/methods , New South Wales , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Retrospective Studies , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Research Design
18.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083557, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806436

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the yield and cost of implementing systematic screening for tuberculosis (TB) disease among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and initiation of TB preventive treatment (TPT) in Ghana. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from August 2019 to December 2020. SETTING: One hospital from each of Ghana's regions (10 total). PARTICIPANTS: Any PLHIV already receiving or newly initiating antiretroviral treatment were eligible for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received TB symptom screening and chest radiography. Those with symptoms and/or an abnormal chest X-ray provided a sputum sample for microbiological testing. All without TB disease were offered TPT. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated the proportion diagnosed with TB disease and proportion initiating TPT. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with TB disease diagnosis. We used microcosting to estimate the health system cost per person screened (2020 US$). RESULTS: Of 12 916 PLHIV attending participating clinics, 2639 (20%) were enrolled in the study and screened for TB disease. Overall, 341/2639 (12.9%, 95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) had TB symptoms and/or an abnormal chest X-ray; 50/2639 (1.9%; 95% CI 1.4% to 2.5%) were diagnosed with TB disease, 20% of which was subclinical. In multivariable analysis, only those newly initiating antiretroviral treatment were at increased odds of TB disease (adjusted OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.2). Among 2589 participants without TB, 2581/2589 (99.7%) initiated TPT. Overall, the average cost per person screened during the study was US$57.32. CONCLUSION: In Ghana, systematic TB disease screening among PLHIV was of high yield and modest cost when combined with TPT. Our findings support WHO recommendations for routine TB disease screening among PLHIV.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Mass Screening , Humans , Ghana/epidemiology , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Male , Adult , Pilot Projects , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12198, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806580

ABSTRACT

The objective of our work was to evaluate the screening of hepatic fibrosis in primary care using the FIB-4 score, automatically calculated. When the FIB-4 was ≥ 1.3, it was defined as positive, and ELF Test was performed. FIB-4 positivity was confirmed when ELF Test was ≥ 9.8 indicating an advanced fibrosis. Among the 3427 patients included, 869 (25%) had a positive FIB-4 score, 784 (22.5%) at intermediate (FIB-4: 1.3-2.67), and 85 (2.5%) at high risk of fibrosis (FIB-4 > 2.67). 509 (59%) of the FIB-4 positive were confirmed by the ELF Test. The percentage of confirmation was significantly higher in patients over 65 years (83 vs. 57%), with FIB-4 > 2.67 (80 vs. 56%), BMI > 25 (47 vs. 37%), and diabetes (24 vs. 14%), p = 0.001). In patients without known liver disease (92%), the practitioner identified a cause of disease in 27% of cases: mainly NAFLD and alcohol. Liver fibrosis was suspected on FIB-4 in 25% of patients in primary care. The ELF Test, performed as a second-line, improves the screening of liver fibrosis, particularly for FIB-4 intermediate results. A positive FIB-4 test allows physicians to recognize a liver disease, providing an opportunity for timely intervention.Clinical trial registration: Comité de protection des personnes du sud-ouest et outre-mer SI18.00832.201865-MS04-IDRCB 2018-A01571-54.


Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis , Primary Health Care , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Aged , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...