Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 43(7): 683-690, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928567

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to do a cost-benefit analysis of myofascial release therapy (MRT) compared to manual therapy (MT) for treating occupational mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Variables regarding the outcomes of the intervention were intensity of neck pain, cervical disability, quality of life, craniovertebral angle, and ranges of cervical motion. Costs were assessed based on a social perspective using diary costs. Between-groups differences in average cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility ratios were assessed using bootstrap parametric techniques. The economic cost-benefit evaluation was with regard to an experimental parallel group study design. There were 59 participants. RESULTS: Myofascial released therapy showed significant improvement over MT for cervical mobility (side bending, rotation, and craniovertebral angle). The total cost of MRT was approximately 20% less (-$519.81; 95% confidence interval, -$1193.67 to $100.31) than that of MT, although this was not statistically significant. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios showed that MRT could be associated with lower economic costs. CONCLUSION: With probabilities of 93.9% and 95.8%, MRT seems to be cost-effective for treating mechanical neck pain without the need to add any additional cost to obtain a better clinical benefit. Consequently, we believe it could be included in the clinical practice guidelines of different Spanish health care institutions.


Subject(s)
Massage/economics , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/economics , Neck Pain/economics , Adult , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Massage/methods , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Neck Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
2.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 46: 102109, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31989965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deep tissue massage ('massage'), strengthening and stretching exercises ('exercises') or a combination of both ('combined therapy') in comparison with advice to stay active ('advice') for subacute and persistent neck pain, from a societal perspective. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a four-arm randomized controlled trial of 619 participants followed-up for one year. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-3L and costs were calculated from baseline to one year. The interventions were ranked according to quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in a cost-consequence analysis. Thereafter, an incremental cost per QALY was calculated. RESULTS: In the cost-consequence analysis, in comparison with advice, exercises resulted in higher QALY gains, and massage and the combined therapy were more costly and less beneficial. Exercises may be a cost-effective treatment compared with advice to stay active if society is willing to pay 17 640 EUR per QALY. However, differences in QALY gains were minimal; on average, participants in the massage group, spent a year in a state of health valued at 0.88, exercises: 0.89, combined therapy: 0.88 and, advice: 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: Exercises are cost-effective compared to advice given that the societal willingness to pay is above 17 640 EUR per year in full health gained. Massage and a combined therapy are not cost-effective. While exercise appeared to have the best cost/benefit profile, even this treatment had only a modest benefit and treatment innovation is needed. Advice to stay active remains as a good therapeutic alternative from an economical perspective.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling , Massage , Muscle Stretching Exercises , Neck Muscles/physiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Counseling/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sweden
3.
Health Technol Assess ; 22(58): 1-134, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30375324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Between 50% and 80% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) experience neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) (i.e. constipation and faecal incontinence) that affects quality of life and can lead to hospitalisation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abdominal massage plus advice on bowel symptoms on PwMS compared with advice only. A process evaluation investigated the factors that affected the clinical effectiveness and possible implementation of the different treatments. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial with process evaluation and health economic components. Outcome analysis was undertaken blind. SETTING: The trial took place in 12 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: PwMS who had 'bothersome' NBD. INTERVENTION: Following individualised training, abdominal massage was undertaken daily for 6 weeks (intervention group). Advice on good bowel management as per the Multiple Sclerosis Society advice booklet was provided to both groups. All participants received weekly telephone calls from the research nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference between the intervention and control groups in change in the NBD score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes were measured via a bowel diary, adherence diary, the Constipation Scoring System, patient resource questionnaire and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: A total of 191 participants were finalised, 189 of whom were randomised (two participants were finalised in error) (control group, n = 99; intervention group, n = 90) and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 10.83 years), 81% (n = 154) were female and 11% (n = 21) were wheelchair dependent. Fifteen participants from the intervention group and five from the control group were lost to follow-up. The change in NBD score by week 24 demonstrated no significant difference between groups [mean difference total score -1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.32 to 0.04; p = 0.0558]; there was a significant difference between groups in the change in the frequency of stool evacuation per week (mean difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.21; p = 0.039) and in the number of times per week that participants felt that they emptied their bowels completely (mean difference 1.08, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.76; p = 0.002), in favour of the intervention group. Of participant interviewees, 75% reported benefits, for example less difficulty passing stool, more complete evacuations, less bloated, improved appetite, and 85% continued with the massage. A cost-utility analysis conducted from a NHS and patient cost perspective found in the imputed sample with bootstrapping a mean incremental outcome effect of the intervention relative to usual care of -0.002 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (95% CI -0.029 to 0.027 QALYs). In the same imputed sample with bootstrapping, the mean incremental cost effect of the intervention relative to usual care was £56.50 (95% CI -£372.62 to £415.68). No adverse events were reported. Limitations include unequal randomisation, dropout and the possibility of ineffective massage technique. CONCLUSION: The increment in the primary outcome favoured the intervention group, but it was small and not statistically significant. The economic analysis identified that the intervention was dominated by the control group. Given the small improvement in the primary outcome, but not in terms of QALYs, a low-cost version of the intervention might be considered worthwhile by some patients. FUTURE WORK: Research is required to establish possible mechanisms of action and modes of massage delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85007023 and NCT03166007. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 58. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Subject(s)
Massage/economics , Massage/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Neurogenic Bowel/etiology , Neurogenic Bowel/therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Quality of Life , Sex Factors , Single-Blind Method
4.
J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med ; 22(4): 851-855, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28845677

ABSTRACT

Massage offers cancer patients general quality of life benefits as well as alleviation of cancer-related symptoms/cancer-treatment-related symptoms including pain, anxiety, and fatigue. Little is known about whether massage is accessible to cancer patients who receive treatment in the outpatient setting and how massage is incorporated into the overall cancer treatment plan. Outpatient cancer centers (n = 78) in a single metropolitan area were included this mixed-methods project that included a systematic analysis of website information and a telephone survey. Massage was offered at only 40 centers (51.3% of total). A range of massage modalities were represented, with energy-based therapies (Reiki and Therapeutic Touch) most frequently provided. Although massage therapists are licensed health care providers in the states included in this analysis, massage was also provided by nurses, physical therapists, and other health care professionals.


Subject(s)
Massage/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Massage/economics , New York City , Outpatients
5.
Crit Care Nurse ; 37(1): 62-69, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28148616

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients in the progressive care unit typically experience high levels of pain and anxiety and exhibit difficulty sleeping. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether either clinical massage or guided imagery could reduce pain and anxiety and improve sleep. METHODS: This study included 288 inpatients on 2 floors of a progressive care unit. On 1 floor, each patient was offered daily a 15-minute complimentary clinical massage, whereas the patients on the other floor were provided access to a 30-minute guided-imagery recording. Patients were asked to rate their pain and anxiety levels immediately before and after the massage intervention or were asked whether the guided-imagery intervention was helpful for pain, anxiety, or insomnia. RESULTS: The massage intervention showed an immediate and significant reduction in self-reported pain and anxiety (P < .001); likewise, a significant number of patients self-reported that guided imagery helped alleviate pain, anxiety, and insomnia (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that clinical massage and guided imagery can benefit patients in the progressive care unit.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Hospital Units/classification , Imagery, Psychotherapy/methods , Massage/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain/diagnosis , Anxiety/physiopathology , Complementary Therapies/methods , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Imagery, Psychotherapy/economics , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Massage/economics , Michigan , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
6.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 18(3): 279-288, 2016 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28157084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accumulation of musculoskeletal overload experienced daily over a long period, for months or even years may lead to serious health problems. Simple, quick and easy-to-administer prophylactic and therapeutic interventions not involving complicated medical procedures can bring tangible benefits for sufferers. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and effects of a massage programme performed during breaks at work among persons exposed to long-term overload of the spinal column and areas around the spine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 50 office workers (20 women and 30 men, mean age 34.04 years). The subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group (massage, 25 people) and a control group (25 people). The study was completed in four weeks, during which 8 massage sessions took place (twice a week for 15 minutes). Subjective assessment tools were used, namely the IPAQ-short version for evaluation of physical activity, Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) for assessment of musculoskeletal pain and a survey to assess the participants' satisfaction with the massage programme. An objective assessment tool was an algometric evaluation of the pain threshold (kg/cm2) in selected muscle trigger points. Statistical significance of differences was set at p <0.05. RESULTS: The level of physical activity was comparable between the groups, with 42% of the experimental group and 40% in the control group declaring a high level of physical activity. According to the CMDQ, the biggest differences after massage were noted with regard to the reduction of pain in the lower and upper spine and the right arm (p <0.001), while slightly smaller improvements were noted in the right shoulder and left forearm (p <0.05). In other parts of the body and in the control group, the changes were not statistically significant. The pain threshold assessed by algometry increased at all points examined in the experimental group, with pain sensitivity decreasing the most in the trapezius and supraspinous muscles on the left side of the spine (p <0.001). In the control group, the changes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed programme of chair massage in the workplace proved to be effective in relieving musculoskeletal overload and discomfort of the spine and upper limbs. 2. The advantages of this method include its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, ease of administration in different places and short treatment time. It seems advisable to popularise it and increase its use in practice in the prevention of physical and mental work-related overload.


Subject(s)
Massage/economics , Massage/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Adult , Equipment and Supplies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poland , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace
7.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu ; 35(8): 773-7, 2015 Aug.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26571889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy between the combined therapy of massage and magnetic-sticking at the auricular points and the simple massage therapy, and conduct the health economics evaluation. METHODS: Seventy-two patients of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were randomized into a combined therapy group, and a simple massage group, 36 cases in each one. Finally, 35 cases and 34 cases were met the inclusive criteria in the corresponding groups separately. In the combined therapy group, the massage therapy and the magnetic sticking therapy at auricular points were combined in the treatment. Massage therapy was mainly applied to Fengchi (GB 20), Jianjing (GB 21), Jianwaishu (SI 14), Jianyu (LI 15) and Quchi (LI 11). The main auricular points for magnetic sticking pressure were Jingzhui (AH13), Gan (On12) Shen (CO10), Shenmen (TF4), Pizhixia (AT4). In the simple massage group, the simple massage therapy was given, the massage parts and methods were the same as those in the combined therapy group. The treatment was given once every two days, three times a week, for 4 weeks totally. The cervical spondylosis effect scale and the simplified McGill pain questionnaire were adopted to observe the improvements in the clinical symptoms, clinical examination, daily life movement, superficial muscular pain in the neck and the health economics cost in the patients of the two groups. The effect was evaluated in the two groups. RESULTS: The effective rate and the clinical curative rate in the combined therapy group were better than those in the control group [100. 0% (35/35) vs 85. 3% (29/34), 42. 9% (15/35) vs 17. 6% (6/34), both P<0. 05]. The scores of the spontaneous symptoms, clinical examnation, daily life movement and superficialmuscular pain in the neck were improved apparently after treatment as compared with those before treatment in the patients of the two groups (all P<0. 001). In terms of the improvements in the spontaneous symptoms, clinical examination total scores and superficial muscular pain in the' neck were more significant in the combined therapy group as compared with those in the simple massage group (P<0. 05, P<0. 01, P<0. 001). The cost at the unit effect in the combined therapy group was lower than that in the simple massage group (P<0. 05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the simple massage therapy, the massage therapy combined with magnetic sticking therapy at auricular points achieves the better effect and lower cost in health economics.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture, Ear , Magnetic Field Therapy , Massage , Radiculopathy/therapy , Spondylosis/therapy , Acupuncture Points , Acupuncture, Ear/economics , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Female , Humans , Magnetic Field Therapy/economics , Male , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Radiculopathy/economics , Spondylosis/economics , Treatment Outcome
8.
Trials ; 16: 414, 2015 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26377322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a major health problem in populations worldwide and an economic burden in modern societies due to its high prevalence and costs in terms of health care expenditures and lost productivity. Massage and exercise therapy are widely used management options for neck pain. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence regarding their effectiveness for subacute and long-lasting neck pain. This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial aiming to determine the effect of massage and/or exercise therapy on subacute and long-lasting neck pain over the course of 1 year. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial in which at least 600 study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of four treatment arms: massage therapy (A), exercise therapy (B), exercise therapy plus massage therapy (C) and advice to stay active (D). The study has an E-health approach, and study participants are being recruited through advertising with a mix of traditional and online marketing channels. Web-based self-report questionnaires measure the main outcomes at 7, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after inclusion. The primary outcomes are a clinically important improvement in pain intensity and pain-related disability at follow-up, measured with a modified version of the Chronic Pain Questionnaire (CPQ). The secondary outcomes are global improvement, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), sick leave, drug consumption and healthcare utilization. Adverse events are measured by questionnaires at return visits to the clinic, and automated text messages (SMSes) survey neck pain intensity and pain-related disability every week over one year. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide clinicians and stakeholders much needed knowledge to plan medical care for subacute and long-lasting neck pain disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01453590. Date of registration: 3 July 2014.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Massage , Neck Pain/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disability Evaluation , Exercise Therapy/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/economics , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
9.
Public Health Rep ; 130(5): 533-42, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26327731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Social determinants of health may be substantially affected by spatial factors, which together may explain the persistence of health inequities. Clustering of possible sources of negative health and social outcomes points to a spatial focus for future interventions. We analyzed the spatial clustering of sex work businesses in Southern California to examine where and why they cluster. We explored economic and legal factors as possible explanations of clustering. METHODS: We manually coded data from a website used by paying members to post reviews of female massage parlor workers. We identified clusters of sexually oriented massage parlor businesses using spatial autocorrelation tests. We conducted spatial regression using census tract data to identify predictors of clustering. RESULTS: A total of 889 venues were identified. Clusters of tracts having higher-than-expected numbers of sexually oriented massage parlors ("hot spots") were located outside downtowns. These hot spots were characterized by a higher proportion of adult males, a higher proportion of households below the federal poverty level, and a smaller average household size. CONCLUSION: Sexually oriented massage parlors in Los Angeles and Orange counties cluster in particular neighborhoods. More research is needed to ascertain the causal factors of such clusters and how interventions can be designed to leverage these spatial factors.


Subject(s)
Massage/legislation & jurisprudence , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Sex Workers/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , California , Cluster Analysis , Ethnicity/ethnology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Los Angeles , Male , Massage/economics , Massage/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Sex Distribution , Sex Workers/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Spatial Analysis , Young Adult
10.
Complement Ther Med ; 23(5): 637-43, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26365442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the major factors influencing financial compensation in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and prioritize what TCM services should be compensated for. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two structured questionnaires-a TCM service baseline questionnaire and a service cost questionnaire-were used to collect information from TCM public hospitals on TCM services provided in certain situations and service cost accounting. The cross-sectional study examined 110 TCM services provided in four county TCM public hospitals in Shandong province. From the questionnaire data, a screening index system was established via expert consultation and brainstorming. Comprehensive evaluation of TCM services was performed using the analytic hierarchy process method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weighted coefficients were used to measure the importance of each criterion, after which comprehensive evaluation scores for each service were ranked to indicate what services should receive priority for financial compensation. RESULTS: Economy value, social value, and efficacy value were the three main criteria for screening for what TCM services should be compensated for. The economy value local weight had the highest value (0.588), of which the profit sub-criterion (0.278) was the most important for TCM financial compensation. Moxibustion was tied for the highest comprehensive evaluation scores, at 0.65 while Acupuncture and Massage Therapy were tied for the second and third highest, with 0.63 and 0.58, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Government and policymakers should consider offer financial compensation to Moxibustion, Acupuncture, Massage Therapy, and TCM Orthopedics as priority services. In the meanwhile, it is essential to correct the unreasonable pricing, explore compensation methods, objects and payment, and revise and improve the accounting system for the costs of TCM services.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Massage , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Acupuncture Therapy/economics , Acupuncture Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Massage/economics , Massage/statistics & numerical data , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/economics , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods
11.
Health Soc Work ; 40(1): 19-25, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25665287

ABSTRACT

Through years of engagement within health, the profession of social work has worked diligently to influence and incorporate the professional values of holism and biopsychosocial-spiritual approaches into mainstream health care to support health care consumers. Continuing education supports social workers' specialized knowledge of health conditions as well as issues affecting health care systems and delivery. Two pressing and current issues in health of concern to social work are (1) nonspecific back pain and (2) the fastest growing consumer trend in North America--integration of complementary and alternative medicine. This article offers information relevant to social workers in practice about the complex and multifactoral condition of chronic nonspecific back pain and the integration of complementary and alternative medicine, in particular, massage therapy, as an effective evidence-based integrated approach.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/therapy , Massage , Social Work , Female , Health Promotion/economics , Humans , Male , Massage/economics
12.
PLoS One ; 7(2): e30248, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22347369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a previous trial of massage for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, we demonstrated feasibility, safety and possible efficacy, with benefits that persisted at least 8 weeks beyond treatment termination. METHODS: We performed a RCT to identify the optimal dose of massage within an 8-week treatment regimen and to further examine durability of response. Participants were 125 adults with OA of the knee, randomized to one of four 8-week regimens of a standardized Swedish massage regimen (30 or 60 min weekly or biweekly) or to a Usual Care control. Outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog pain scale, range of motion, and time to walk 50 feet, assessed at baseline, 8-, 16-, and 24-weeks. RESULTS: WOMAC Global scores improved significantly (24.0 points, 95% CI ranged from 15.3-32.7) in the 60-minute massage groups compared to Usual Care (6.3 points, 95% CI 0.1-12.8) at the primary endpoint of 8-weeks. WOMAC subscales of pain and functionality, as well as the visual analog pain scale also demonstrated significant improvements in the 60-minute doses compared to usual care. No significant differences were seen in range of motion at 8-weeks, and no significant effects were seen in any outcome measure at 24-weeks compared to usual care. A dose-response curve based on WOMAC Global scores shows increasing effect with greater total time of massage, but with a plateau at the 60-minute/week dose. CONCLUSION: Given the superior convenience of a once-weekly protocol, cost savings, and consistency with a typical real-world massage protocol, the 60-minute once weekly dose was determined to be optimal, establishing a standard for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00970008.


Subject(s)
Massage/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, Articular , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Walking
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 155(1): 1-9, 2011 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21727288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of massage for chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 types of massage and usual care for chronic back pain. DESIGN: Parallel-group randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was computer-generated, with centralized allocation concealment. Participants were blinded to massage type but not to assignment to massage versus usual care. Massage therapists were unblinded. The study personnel who assessed outcomes were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00371384) SETTING: An integrated health care delivery system in the Seattle area. PATIENTS: 401 persons 20 to 65 years of age with nonspecific chronic low back pain. INTERVENTION: Structural massage (n = 132), relaxation massage (n = 136), or usual care (n = 133). MEASUREMENTS: Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) and symptom bothersomeness scores at 10 weeks (primary outcome) and at 26 and 52 weeks (secondary outcomes). Mean group differences of at least 2 points on the RDQ and at least 1.5 points on the symptom bothersomeness scale were considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: The massage groups had similar functional outcomes at 10 weeks. The adjusted mean RDQ score was 2.9 points (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.0 points) lower in the relaxation group and 2.5 points (CI, 1.4 to 3.5 points) lower in the structural massage group than in the usual care group, and adjusted mean symptom bothersomeness scores were 1.7 points (CI, 1.2 to 2.2 points) lower with relaxation massage and 1.4 points (CI, 0.8 to 1.9 points) lower with structural massage. The beneficial effects of relaxation massage on function (but not on symptom reduction) persisted at 52 weeks but were small. LIMITATION: Participants were not blinded to treatment. CONCLUSION: Massage therapy may be effective for treatment of chronic back pain, with benefits lasting at least 6 months. No clinically meaningful difference between relaxation and structural massage was observed in terms of relieving disability or symptoms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/therapy , Massage/methods , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Massage/adverse effects , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Relaxation Therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
14.
Complement Ther Med ; 18(3-4): 119-27, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20688257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To outline professionals' experiences of participation, perceived benefits and acceptability of the interventions delivered in the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage), for patients with chronic or recurrent back pain. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with a purposeful sample of twenty professionals (general practitioners (GPs), nurses, Alexander technique teachers, and massage therapists). Data were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Evidence of effectiveness GPs wanted an evidence base for the interventions, whilst nurses, Alexander technique teachers and massage therapists perceived patient reports of benefit as evidence. Professionals' perception of the acceptability of the intervention: professional perspectives differed, with GPs and nurses viewing the structured nature of exercise prescription and Alexander technique lessons as more beneficial and acceptable than massage in alleviating patients' back pain. Economic cost: the cost to patients pursuing Alexander technique lessons and massage was perceived to be a barrier outside the trial. Inter-professional communication: there was little communication between the professionals groups within the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable insights have been gained into the perceived benefits and acceptability of exercise, Alexander technique lessons and massage as interventions for chronic back pain. Lessons in the Alexander technique with or without exercise, was perceived as more beneficial and acceptable than massage by professionals who participated and delivered the ATEAM trial interventions.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Back Pain/therapy , Complementary Therapies , Exercise Therapy , Massage , Patient Satisfaction , Chronic Disease , Complementary Therapies/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Exercise , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Interviews as Topic , Male , Massage/economics , Qualitative Research
15.
J Adv Nurs ; 66(8): 1719-29, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20557387

ABSTRACT

AIM: This paper is a report of a study conducted to evaluate change in health-related quality of life for people with constipation receiving abdominal massage and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two alternative scenarios developed from the original trial. BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem and is associated with decrease in quality of life. Abdominal massage appears to decrease the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms, but its impact on health-related quality of life has not been assessed. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial including 60 participants was conducted in Sweden between 2005 and 2007. The control group continued using laxatives as before and the intervention group received additional abdominal massage. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D and analyzed with linear regression. Two scenarios were outlined to conduct a cost utility analysis. In the self-massage scenario patients learned to give self-massage, and in the professional massage scenario patients in hospital received abdominal massage from an Enrolled Nurse. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis showed that health-related quality of life was statistically significantly increased after 8 weeks of abdominal massage. About 40% were estimated to receive good effect. For 'self-massage', the cost per quality adjusted life year was euro75,000 for the first 16 weeks. For every additional week of abdominal massage, the average dropped and eventually approached euro8300. For 'professional massage', the cost per quality adjusted life year was euro60,000 and eventually dropped to euro28,000. CONCLUSION: Abdominal massage may be cost-effective in the long-term and it is relevant to consider it when managing constipation. A crucial aspect will be to identify those who will benefit.


Subject(s)
Abdomen , Constipation/therapy , Massage/economics , Quality of Life , Self Care/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Constipation/economics , Constipation/physiopathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Laxatives/economics , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Male , Massage/nursing , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts , Patient Education as Topic , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Sweden
16.
Infant Behav Dev ; 33(2): 115-24, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20137814

ABSTRACT

In this paper, preterm infant massage therapy studies are reviewed. Massage therapy has led to weight gain in preterm infants when moderate pressure massage was provided. In studies on passive movement of the limbs, preterm infants also gained significantly more weight, and their bone density also increased. Research on ways of delivering the massage is also explored including using mothers versus therapists and the added effects of using oils. The use of mothers as therapists was effective in at least one study. The use of oils including coconut oil and safflower oil enhanced the average weight gain, and the transcutaneous absorption of oil also increased triglycerides. In addition, the use of synthetic oil increased vagal activity, which may indirectly contribute to weight gain. The weight gain was associated with shorter hospital stays and, thereby, significant hospital cost savings. Despite these benefits, preterm infant massage is only practiced in 38% of neonatal intensive care units. This may relate to the underlying mechanisms not being well understood. The increases noted in vagal activity, gastric motility, insulin and IGF-1 levels following moderate pressure massage are potential underlying mechanisms. However, those variables combined do not explain all of the variance in weight gain, highlighting the need for additional mechanism studies.


Subject(s)
Massage/methods , Premature Birth/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Massage/economics
17.
BMJ ; 337: a2656, 2008 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19074232

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: An economic evaluation of therapeutic massage, exercise, and lessons in the Alexander technique for treating persistent back pain. DESIGN: Cost consequences study and cost effectiveness analysis at 12 month follow-up of a factorial randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: 579 patients with chronic or recurrent low back pain recruited from primary care. INTERVENTIONS: Normal care (control), massage, and six or 24 lessons in the Alexander technique. Half of each group were randomised to a prescription for exercise from a doctor plus behavioural counselling from a nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs to the NHS and to participants. Comparison of costs with Roland-Morris disability score (number of activities impaired by pain), days in pain, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparison of NHS costs with QALY gain, using incremental cost effectiveness ratios and cost effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Intervention costs ranged from pound30 for exercise prescription to pound596 for 24 lessons in Alexander technique plus exercise. Cost of health services ranged from pound50 for 24 lessons in Alexander technique to pound124 for exercise. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of single therapies showed that exercise offered best value ( pound61 per point on disability score, pound9 per additional pain-free day, pound2847 per QALY gain). For two-stage therapy, six lessons in Alexander technique combined with exercise was the best value (additional pound64 per point on disability score, pound43 per additional pain-free day, pound5332 per QALY gain). CONCLUSIONS: An exercise prescription and six lessons in Alexander technique alone were both more than 85% likely to be cost effective at values above pound20 000 per QALY, but the Alexander technique performed better than exercise on the full range of outcomes. A combination of six lessons in Alexander technique lessons followed by exercise was the most effective and cost effective option.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/therapy , Complementary Therapies/economics , Exercise Therapy/economics , Massage/economics , Ambulatory Care/economics , Back Pain/economics , Chronic Disease , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Recurrence , State Medicine/economics
18.
BMC Complement Altern Med ; 8: 46, 2008 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18652682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional Bowel Disorders (FBD) are chronic disorders that are difficult to treat and manage. Many patients and doctors are dissatisfied with the level of improvement in symptoms that can be achieved with standard medical care which may lead them to seek alternatives for care. There are currently no data on the types of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) used for FBDs other than Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), or on the economic costs of CAM treatments. The aim of this study is to determine prevalence, types and costs of CAM in IBS, functional diarrhea, functional constipation, and functional abdominal pain. METHODS: 1012 Patients with FBD were recruited through a health care maintenance organization and followed for 6 months. Questionnaires were used to ascertain: Utilization and expenditures on CAM, symptom severity (IBS-SS), quality of life (IBS-QoL), psychological distress (BSI) and perceived treatment effectiveness. Costs for conventional medical care were extracted from administrative claims. RESULTS: CAM was used by 35% of patients, at a median yearly cost of $200. The most common CAM types were ginger, massage therapy and yoga. CAM use was associated with female gender, higher education, and anxiety. Satisfaction with physician care and perceived effectiveness of prescription medication were not associated with CAM use. Physician referral to a CAM provider was uncommon but the majority of patients receiving this recommendation followed their physician's advice. CONCLUSION: CAM is used by one-third of FBD patients. CAM use does not seem to be driven by dissatisfaction with conventional care. Physicians should discuss CAM use and effectiveness with their patients and refer patients if appropriate.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/economics , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/economics , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Abdominal Pain/economics , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Adult , Constipation/economics , Constipation/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Diarrhea/economics , Diarrhea/therapy , Female , Zingiber officinale , Humans , Male , Massage/economics , Massage/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction/economics , Phytotherapy/economics , Phytotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Professional-Patient Relations , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Yoga
20.
BMC Public Health ; 7: 61, 2007 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17451596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic diseases use complementary therapies, often provided by their physicians. In Germany, several physician-provided complementary therapies have been reimbursed by health insurance companies as part of health benefit programs. In most of these therapies, the patient has a predominantly passive role. In eurythmy therapy, however, patients actively exercise specific movements with the hands, the feet or the whole body. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in patients practising eurythmy therapy exercises for chronic diseases. METHODS: In conjunction with a health benefit program, 419 outpatients from 94 medical practices in Germany, referred to 118 eurythmy therapists, participated in a prospective cohort study. Main outcomes were disease severity (Disease and Symptom Scores, physicians' and patients' assessment on numerical rating scales 0-10) and quality of life (adults: SF-36, children aged 8-16: KINDL, children 1-7: KITA). Disease Score was documented after 0, 6 and 12 months, other outcomes after 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and (SF-36 and Symptom Score) 48 months. RESULTS: Most common indications were mental disorders (31.7% of patients; primarily depression, fatigue, and childhood emotional disorder) and musculoskeletal diseases (23.4%). Median disease duration at baseline was 3.0 years (interquartile range 1.0-8.5). Median number of eurythmy therapy sessions was 12 (interquartile range 10-19), median therapy duration was 119 days (84-188). All outcomes improved significantly between baseline and all subsequent follow-ups (exceptions: KITA Psychosoma in first three months and KINDL). Improvements from baseline to 12 months were: Disease Score from mean (standard deviation) 6.65 (1.81) to 3.19 (2.27) (p < 0.001), Symptom Score from 5.95 (1.75) to 3.49 (2.12) (p < 0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary from 43.13 (10.25) to 47.10 (9.78) (p < 0.001), SF-36 Mental Component Summary from 38.31 (11.67) to 45.01 (11.76) (p < 0.001), KITA Psychosoma from 69.53 (15.45) to 77.21 (13.60) (p = 0.001), and KITA Daily Life from 59.23 (21.78) to 68.14 (18.52) (p = 0.001). All these improvements were maintained until the last follow-up. Improvements were similar in patients not using diagnosis-related adjunctive therapies within the first six study months. Adverse reactions to eurythmy therapy occurred in 3.1% (13/419) of patients. No patient stopped eurythmy therapy due to adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Patients practising eurythmy therapy exercises had long-term improvement of chronic disease symptoms and quality of life. Although the pre-post design of the present study does not allow for conclusions about comparative effectiveness, study findings suggest that eurythmy therapy can be useful for patients motivated for this therapy.


Subject(s)
Anthroposophy , Chronic Disease/therapy , Exercise Movement Techniques , Massage , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease/classification , Chronic Disease/psychology , Exercise Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Exercise Movement Techniques/economics , Female , Germany , Humans , Infant , Insurance Coverage , Male , Massage/adverse effects , Massage/economics , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...