Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.045
Filter
1.
Pediatrics ; 153(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ensuring equitable vaccination access for immigrant communities is critical for guiding efforts to redress health disparities, but vaccine coverage data are limited. We evaluated childhood vaccination coverage by parental birth country (PBC) through the linkage of Washington State Immunization Information System data and birth records. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort evaluation of children born in Washington from January 1, 2006 to November 12, 2019. We assessed up-to-date vaccination coverage status for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP), and poliovirus vaccines at ages 36 months and 7 years. Children with ≥1 parent(s) born in selected non-US countries were compared with children with 2 US-born parents, using Poisson regression models to provide prevalence ratios. RESULTS: We identified 902 909 eligible children, of which 24% had ≥1 non-US-born parent(s). Vaccination coverage at 36 months by PBC ranged from 41.0% to 93.2% for ≥1 MMR doses and ≥3 poliovirus doses and 32.6% to 86.4% for ≥4 DTaP doses. Compared with children of US-born parents, the proportion of children up to date for all 3 vaccines was 3% to 16% higher among children of Filipino-, Indian-, and Mexican-born parents and 33% to 56% lower among children of Moldovan-, Russian-, and Ukrainian-born parents. Within-PBC coverage patterns were similar for all vaccines with some exceptions. Similar PBC-level differences were observed at 7 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The linkage of public health data improved the characterization of community-level childhood immunization outcomes. The findings provide actionable information to understand community-level vaccination determinants and support interventions to enhance vaccine coverage.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Vaccination Coverage , Humans , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Washington , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Child , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Parents , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage
2.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 77(4): 476-481, 2024 May 20.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783656

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mumps is a contagious viral disease occurring mainly in children, the source of infection being the sick/infected person. Since 2003, vaccination against mumps has been mandatory in Poland, performed according to a two-dose schedule. As part of the Public Health Immunization Program (PSO), the MMR combination vaccine (against measles, mumps and rubella) is used for the entire population of children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological indicators of mumps in Poland in 2021 compared to previous years, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis of the epidemiological situation of mumps in Poland in 2021 was based on the interpretation of data from the bulletin , "Infectious diseases and poisonings in Poland in 2021" and , "Immunization in Poland in 2021". RESULTS: 484 cases of mumps were registered in Poland in 2021. The total incidence was 1.3 per 100,000 residents, which was lower than in 2020. The highest incidence of 1.8 per 100,000 residents was registered in Pomorskie Province, and the lowest incidence of 0.7 in Lower Silesia Province. The highest incidence (6.4/100 thousand) was recorded in children aged 0-4 and 5-9. The incidence rate for men (1.4/100,000) was higher than for women (1.1). In 2021, there were 9 patients hospitalized due to mumps, this was more than in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in the number of cases of mumps in 2021 remained related to the ongoing pandemic - the restrictions introduced during the pandemic period led to a decrease in the number of cases not only of COVID-19, but also of other diseases spread by the droplet route, including mumps. The number of registered cases based on the reports of diagnosing physicians may be underestimating the actual number of cases due to the continued difficult access of patients to primary care physicians.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mumps , Humans , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Poland/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Infant , Child , Female , Male , Adolescent , Incidence , Adult , Young Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Age Distribution , Middle Aged , Infant, Newborn , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Registries , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Vaccine ; 42(13): 3153-3156, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627149

ABSTRACT

In October 2023, the Tel Aviv District was notified of ten cases of measles. The outbreak initiated in a preschool with high vaccination coverage with one dose of MMR vaccine. Serological testing was available for eight patients (six children and two adults). Among the six children vaccinated with one dose of MMR vaccine, primary vaccine failure was demonstrated. Among the adults, secondary vaccine failure was confirmed. The outbreak was successfully contained due to a combination of factors, notably its occurrence within a population characterized by high vaccination coverage in Tel Aviv, during a period of restricted public interactions due to the prevailing state of war in the country. Despite challenging wartime conditions, effective prophylactic measures were promptly executed, encompassing a 2-dose MMR vaccination schedule for close contacts and the broader community of children in the TA district, successfully curbing the outbreak and preventing widespread infections.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles , Vaccination Coverage , Vaccination , Humans , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Israel/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Male , Female , Adult , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Child , Infant , Immunization Schedule , Adolescent , Young Adult
6.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(6): 587-595, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Global pediatric immunization programs with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have reduced vaccine-type pneumococcal disease, but a substantial disease burden of non-PCV serotypes remains. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of 20-valent PCV (PCV20) relative to 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in healthy infants. Participants received 2 infant doses and a toddler dose of PCV20 or PCV13, with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis combination vaccine at all doses and measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines at the toddler dose. Primary pneumococcal immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (NI) of PCV20 to PCV13 for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations after infant and toddler doses and percentages of participants with predefined serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations after infant doses. Safety endpoints included local reactions, systemic events and adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 1204 participants were vaccinated (PCV20, n = 601; PCV13, n = 603). One month after the toddler dose, 19/20 serotypes met NI for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations; serotype 6B narrowly missed NI [PCV20/PCV13 geometric mean ratio: 0.57 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.67); NI criterion: lower 2-sided 95% confidence interval >0.5]. Sixteen/twenty serotypes met NI for ≥1 primary objective after 2 infant doses. PCV20 induced robust opsonophagocytic activity, and boosting responses were observed for all vaccine serotypes, including those missing statistical NI. The safety/tolerability profile of PCV20 was like that of PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: PCV20 3-dose series in infants was safe and elicited robust immune responses. Based on these results and PCV13 experience, PCV20 3-dose series is expected to be protective for all 20 vaccine serotypes. NCT04546425.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Vaccines, Conjugate , Humans , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Infant , Double-Blind Method , Male , Female , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Vaccines, Conjugate/immunology , Vaccines, Conjugate/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Infections/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Chickenpox Vaccine/immunology , Chickenpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Immunization Schedule , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology , Child, Preschool , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines, Combined
7.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 28(3): 253-258, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No single treatment is ideal for genital warts with high rate of resistance using conventional modalities as topical podophyllin; however, several intralesional immunotherapies are being tested nowadays, with variable results. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of treating resistant and recurrent genital warts by 2 intralesional immunotherapies [Candida antigen and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine] and compared them with topical podophyllin. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 45 patients with resistant or recurrent genital warts were enrolled in this study. Size and number of warts were detected in each patient, patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A injected with intralesional Candida antigen. Group B with intralesional MMR vaccine. Group C were treated with topical 25% podophyllin. Patients received a session every 2 weeks for 3 treatment sessions. RESULTS: With regard to the reduction in size and number of all warts, the best response was obtained in Candida antigen group where 46.7% showed complete clearance and 40% showed partial response followed by MMR group and the last was the podophyllin group, with no significant difference between them. Complete clearance of mother warts was noticed in 86.7% of Candida group, 53.3% in MMR group, and last 40% in podophyllin group, with a significantly better response in the Candida group (P = .027). CONCLUSION: Both intralesional Candida antigen and MMR vaccine are simple, safe, and effective treatment options with comparable results and better response than topical podophyllin.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Fungal , Condylomata Acuminata , Injections, Intralesional , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Podophyllin , Humans , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Male , Adult , Female , Antigens, Fungal/administration & dosage , Antigens, Fungal/immunology , Antigens, Fungal/therapeutic use , Condylomata Acuminata/drug therapy , Podophyllin/administration & dosage , Podophyllin/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Candida/immunology , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Immunotherapy/methods , Administration, Topical , Treatment Outcome
8.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(3): 96, 2024 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430244

ABSTRACT

Given the higher susceptibility to infectious disease in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies for inflammatory dermatologic conditions, immunization is important in this population. While live vaccines protect against life-threatening diseases, they can be harmful in immunosuppressed patients given the risk of replication of the attenuated pathogen and adverse reactions. The utilization of live vaccines in immunosuppressed patients depends on multiple factors such as the vaccine and therapy regimen. To provide an overview of evidence-based recommendations for the use of live vaccines in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies for dermatological conditions. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed using keywords live vaccine, live-attenuated vaccine, dermatology, immunosuppressed, and immunocompromised, and specific immunosuppressive therapies: corticosteroids, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, biologics. Relevant articles written in English were included. Using these keywords, 125 articles were reviewed, of which 28 were ultimately selected. Recommendations for live vaccines can be determined on a case-by-case basis. Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (MMRV) vaccines may be safely administered to patients on low-dose immunosuppressive agents while the yellow fever vaccine is typically contraindicated. It may be safe to administer live MMRV boosters to children on immunosuppressive therapies and the live herpes zoster vaccine to patients on biologics. Given poor adherence to immunization guidelines in immunosuppressed patients, dermatologists have a critical role in educating patients and general practitioners regarding live vaccines. By reviewing a patient's vaccination history and following immunization guidelines prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapies, physicians can mitigate morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Immunocompromised Host , Vaccination , Humans , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Yellow Fever Vaccine/administration & dosage , Yellow Fever Vaccine/adverse effects
9.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 1): 275-280, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385412

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Solid-organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of severe infections due to their immunosuppressed state. Despite the recommendation of routine screening and vaccination before transplant to mitigate this danger, vaccination rates in these patients are still below desirable levels. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of positive antibody rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella among children who are candidates for renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and included 144 pediatric kidney transplant patients for the past 7 years. We reviewed the medical records of all participants to evaluate their serologic status for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella viruses before kidney transplant. RESULTS: In this study, 144 pediatric kidney transplant candidates (mean age 11.5 years, 56.9% male) were enrolled, and the most frequent causes of the chronic renal disease were congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and glomerular diseases (32.6%). Seropositivity rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella were 59.0%, 31.9%, 46.5%, and 43.6%, respectively, and all patients who tested negative for antibodies were vaccinated before transplant. Younger age at transplant (OR = 0.909, 95% CI = 0.840-0.923; P = .017) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.1548-7.735; P = .002) were significantly associated with increased measles seropositivity, although no significant associations were observed for the other viruses. CONCLUSIONS: We observed lower seropositivity rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in pediatric kidney transplant patients versus healthy children and other previous studies. It is essential to address these suboptimal rates to protect the health of these vulnerable patients. Future research should focus on targeted interventions to improve vaccination rates and outcomes in this population.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox , Kidney Transplantation , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Viral Vaccines , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Viral , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Herpesvirus 3, Human , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Rubella/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage
10.
Vaccine ; 42(2): 322-331, 2024 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between socio-demographic determinants and uptake of childhood Measles, Mumps & Rubella (MMR) vaccines and the association between pregnant women's pertussis vaccine uptake and their children's MMR vaccine uptake. METHODS: We used nationally-representative linked mother-baby electronic records from the United Kingdom's Clinical-Practice-Research-Datalink. We created a birth cohort of children born between 01.01.2000 and 12.12.2020. We estimated the proportion vaccinated with first MMR vaccine by age 2 years and first and second MMR vaccines by age 5 years. We used survival-analysis and Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between deprivation, ethnicity and maternal age and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and children's MMR uptake. RESULTS: Overall, 89.4 % (710,797/795,497) of children had first MMR by age 2 years and 92.6 % (736,495/795,497) by age 5 years. Among children still in the cohort when second MMR was due, 85.9 % (478,480/557,050) had two MMRs by age 5 years. Children from the most-deprived areas, children of Black ethnicity and children of mothers aged < 20 years had increased risk of being unvaccinated compared with children from the least-deprived areas, White children and children of mothers aged 31-40 years: first MMR by 5 years, adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR):0.86 (CI:0.85-0.87), HR:0.87 (CI:0.85-0.88) & HR:0.89 (CI:0.88-0.90) respectively. Deprivation was the determinant associated with the greatest risk of missed second MMR: adjusted HR:0.82 (CI:0.81-0.83). Children of mothers vaccinated in pregnancy were more likely than children of unvaccinated mothers to have MMR vaccines after adjusting for ethnicity, deprivation, and maternal age (First and Second MMRs adjusted HRs:1.43 (CI:1.41-1.45), 1.49 (CI:1.45-1.53). CONCLUSION: Children from most-deprived areas are less likely to have MMR vaccines compared with children from least-deprived areas. Mothers who take up pregnancy vaccines are more likely to have their children vaccinated with MMR. Healthcare services should promote and facilitate access to both maternal and childhood vaccines during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Cohort Studies , Demography , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Vaccination
11.
Rev Bras Epidemiol ; 26: e230030, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the spatial behavior of hepatitis A, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), and varicella vaccination coverage in children and its relationship with socioeconomic determinants in the state of Minas Gerais. METHODS: This ecological study investigated records of doses administered to children, extracted from the Immunization Information System of 853 municipalities in Minas Gerais, in 2020. We analyzed the vaccination coverage and socioeconomic factors. Spatial scan statistics were used to identify spatial clusters and measure the relative risk based on the vaccination coverage indicator and the Bivariate Moran Index, and thus detect socioeconomic factors correlated with the spatial distribution of vaccination. We used the cartographic base of the state and its municipalities and the ArcGIS and SPSS software programs. RESULTS: Hepatitis A (89.0%), MMR (75.7%), and varicella (89.0%) showed low vaccination coverage. All vaccines analyzed had significant clusters. The clusters most likely to vaccinate their population were mainly located in the Central, Midwest, South Central, and Northwest regions, while the least likely were in the North, Northeast, and Triângulo do Sul regions. The municipal human development index, urbanization rate, and gross domestic product were spatially dependent on vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial behavior of hepatitis A, MMR, and varicella vaccination coverage is heterogeneous and associated with socioeconomic factors. We emphasize that vaccination records require attention and should be continuously monitored to improve the quality of information used in services and research.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Hepatitis A , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps , Rubella , Vaccination Coverage , Child , Humans , Infant , Brazil/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Spatial Behavior , Vaccination
12.
World J Pediatr ; 19(11): 1062-1070, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can damage the immune system, and may result in a loss of protection from infectious diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these treatments on the decrease in antibody titers of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and seroconversion post-revaccination of MMR. METHODS: After completion of treatment for primary diseases, participants received an MMR revaccination. Antibody titers for MMR before revaccination were analyzed for all 110 children. After revaccination, 68 participants received a follow-up evaluation of  antibody titer and adverse reaction. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed that therapeutic schedules were the only factor correlated with lack of antibody titers for measles after completing treatment (P = 0.008), while for mumps and rubella, no statistically significant difference was observed. Importantly, our study clearly demonstrated positive seroconversion rates for measles (97.5%), mumps (81.0%), and rubella (93.2%), with antibody levels rising across the board and peaking at around 6 months following revaccination. However, 6 months after revaccination, a downtrend of antibody titer levels was observed, which is comparatively earlier than the waning immunity observed in healthy children. Furthermore, we found MMR revaccination to be safe, with only a single adverse reaction (local pain at the injection site) reported. CONCLUSIONS: MMR revaccination is immunogenic for the population. We suggest periodic monitoring of antibody titers, in addition to a booster vaccination, although the optimal timing of booster vaccination remains to be investigated further.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Child , Humans , Infant , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Immunization, Secondary/adverse effects , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Rubella/prevention & control , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects
13.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(2): e14043, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36880572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of doses as well as the role for measurement of postvaccination titers after measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccination in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients remains unknown. METHODS: In the present study, we assessed humoral immunity against measles, mumps and rubella before and after MMR vaccination in 187 adults who received at least one dose of the MMR vaccine after HCT. RESULTS: Among those with baseline titers, posttransplant prevaccination seroprotection rates were 56%, 30%, and 54% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively; and significantly lower in allogeneic versus autologous HCT recipients for measles (39% vs. 80%, p = .0001), mumps (22% vs. 41%; p = .02) and rubella (48% vs. 62%, p = .12). Among those who were seronegative at baseline, seroconversion rates after one dose of MMR were 69%, 56%, and 97% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively. Seronegative patients after one dose of MMR (i.e., nonresponders) seroconverted for measles and mumps after a second MMR vaccine dose. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate successful restoration of protective immunity against measles, mumps, and rubella after vaccination in adult HCT recipients; one dose of MMR elicited protective titers in the majority of patients, and a second vaccine dose was immunogenic in nonresponders.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Adult , Humans , Infant , Antibodies, Viral , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Transplant Recipients , Vaccination
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946817

ABSTRACT

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is usually recommended from 24 months after a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Some authors have demonstrated that the MMR vaccination can be safe from 12 months post-HSCT in non-immunosuppressed patients, as recommended by the Brazilian National Immunization Program/Ministry of Health, since 2006. The objectives of this study were to evaluate when patients received MMR vaccine after an HSCT in our care service and if there were reports of any side effects. We retrospectively reviewed the records of HSCT recipients who received at least one MMR dose in our care service, a quaternary teaching hospital in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, from 2017 to 2021. We identified 82 patients: 75.6% (90.1% in the autologous group and 45.1% in the allogeneic group) were vaccinated before 23 months post-transplantation. None reported side effects following the vaccination. Our data support that the MMR vaccination is safe from 12 to 23 months after HSCT.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Humans , Infant , Antibodies, Viral , Brazil , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/chemically induced , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , Rubella/prevention & control , Vaccination
15.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 360-367, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated under immunosuppression, the immune status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been fully assessed prior to immunosuppressive therapy. AIMS: To investigate antiviral serostatus against viruses requiring live vaccines for prevention in IBD patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This multicenter study included IBD patients who were aged <40 years and were treated with thiopurine monotherapy, molecular-targeted monotherapy, or combination therapy. Gender- and age-matched healthy subjects (HS) living in the same areas were included as control group. Antibody titers against measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: A total of 437 IBD patients (163 ulcerative colitis [UC] and 274 Crohn's disease [CD]) and 225 HS were included in the final analysis. Compared with HS, IBD patients had lower seropositivity rates for measles (IBD vs. HS = 83.91% vs. 85.33%), rubella (77.55% vs. 84.89%), mumps (37.50% vs. 37.78%), and varicella (91.26% vs. 96.44%). Gender- and age-adjusted seropositivity rates were lower in UC patients than in both CD patients and HS for measles (UC, CD, and HS = 81.60%, 85.29%, and 85.33%), rubella (76.40%, 78.23%, and 84.89%), mumps (27.16%, 43.70%, and 37.78%), and varicella (90.80%, 91.54%, and 96.44%); the difference was significant for all viruses except measles. Divided by the degree of immunosuppression, there were no significant differences in seropositivity rates among IBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients, especially those with UC, exhibit reduced seropositivity rates and may benefit from screening prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox , Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control
16.
Multimedia | Multimedia Resources | ID: multimedia-9970

ABSTRACT

Encuentros de gestión para la Campaña de vacunacion de sarampión, rubéola, parotiditis y polio que se realiza a nivel nacional. Esta capacitación específica a nivel de la provincia de Buenos Aires está destinada a los referentes del Programa de control de enfermedades inmunoprevenibles de las regiones sanitarias, de los municipios y de los vacunatorios


Subject(s)
Vaccination/methods , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control
17.
Pediatrics ; 148(6)2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34814181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a >99% reduction in US mumps cases after the introduction of mumps vaccine in 1967, outbreaks have occurred in schools and other settings involving vaccinated children and adolescents since 2006. METHODS: We analyzed mumps cases reported by US health departments to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. We present the incidence and vaccination status of pediatric cases (age <18 years) during 2007-2019 and describe demographic, clinical, and vaccination characteristics of pediatric cases reported during the most recent resurgence in 2015-2019. RESULTS: During 2007-2019, 9172 pediatric cases were reported, accounting for a median of 32% of all cases reported each year (range: 13%-59%). A median of 87% (range: 81%-94%) of pediatric patients each year had previously received ≥1 measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine dose. During 2015-2019, of 5461 pediatric cases reported, only 2% of those with known import status (74%) were associated with international travel. One percent of patients had complications and 2% were hospitalized. Among patients aged ≥1 year with known vaccination status (72%), 74% of 1- to 4-year-olds had received ≥1 MMR dose and 86% of 5- to 17-year-olds had received ≥2 MMR doses. Since 2016, pediatric mumps cases have been reported in most US states each year (range: 38-45 states). CONCLUSIONS: Since 2007, one-third of US reported mumps cases occurred in children and adolescents, the majority of whom were vaccinated. Clinicians should suspect mumps in patients with parotitis or mumps complications, regardless of age, travel history, and vaccination status.


Subject(s)
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Infant , Male , Mumps/complications , Sex Distribution , Time Factors , Travel-Related Illness , United States/epidemiology
18.
Neurology ; 97(16): 767-775, 2021 10 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34475124

ABSTRACT

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has triggered a global effort to rapidly develop and deploy effective and safe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations. Vaccination has been one of the most effective medical interventions in human history, although potential safety risks of novel vaccines must be monitored, identified, and quantified. Adverse events must be carefully assessed to define whether they are causally associated with vaccination or coincidence. Neurologic adverse events following immunizations are overall rare but with significant morbidity and mortality when they occur. Here, we review neurologic conditions seen in the context of prior vaccinations and the current data to date on select COVID-19 vaccines including mRNA vaccines and the adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S Johnson & Johnson (Janssen/J&J).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Vaccination/trends , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humans , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Poliovirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Poliovirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects
19.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34372517

ABSTRACT

Mumps is a vaccine-preventable infectious disease diffuse worldwide. The implementation of mumps vaccination reduced largely the spread of infection. On 11,327 Medical School students the prevalence of mumps positive antibodies was evaluated according to dose/doses of vaccine, year of birth and sex. Compliance to mumps vaccine was low in students born before 1990 but increased consistently after this year, above all compliance to two doses, due to the implementation of the vaccine offer. Positivity of mumps antibodies is significantly (p < 0.0001) lower in students vaccinated once (71.2%) compared to those vaccinated twice (85.4%). In addition, students born after 1995, largely vaccinated twice, showed a seropositivity near to 90%. Further, females had a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher proportion of positive antibodies after vaccination than males, both one (74.6% vs. 64.7%) and two doses (86.8% vs. 82.9%). Finally, seropositivity after two vaccine doses remains high (86.1%) even 15 years after the second dose. In conclusion, the research highlighted that vaccination against mumps reaches a good level of coverage only after two doses of vaccine persisting at high levels over 15 years and induces a more significant response in females.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/immunology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Mumps/prevention & control , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Vaccination
20.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e205, 2021 08 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446124

ABSTRACT

On 16-17 January 2020, four suspected mumps cases were reported to the local Public Health Authorities with an epidemiological link to a local school and football club. Of 18 suspected cases identified, 14 were included in this study. Laboratory results confirmed mumps virus as the cause and further sequencing identified genotype G. Our findings highlight that even with a high MMR vaccine coverage, mumps outbreaks in children and young adults can occur. Since most of the cases had documented immunity for mumps, we hypothesise that waning immunity or discordant mumps virus strains are likely explanations for this outbreak.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps virus/immunology , Mumps/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/genetics , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/genetics , Mumps virus/pathogenicity , Portugal/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...