State Legislation to Prevent Diversion of Opioids in Hospice Programs: A Deeper Look Into Ohio Law.

The problem of opioid diversion and its contribution to the opioid epidemic are well known nationally, existing even within hospice care. Proper disposal of opioids may be a critical factor in reducing diversion. In 2014, Ohio implemented legislation requiring a hospice employee to destroy or witness disposal of all unused opioids within a patient's plan of care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 on hospice programs' policies and procedures to prevent opioid diversion in the home. Directors of Ohio-licensed hospices were surveyed to assess the percentage of programs with a written policy in place for disposal of opioids and to calculate a compliance score based on responses to survey questions assessing compliance with legislation components. Fifty-two surveys were completed (39.4%). All survey respondents reported having a written policy in place. A 95.5% average compliance score was calculated, with the largest disparity occurring with timing of opioid disposal. While Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 requires opioid disposal at the time of patient's death or when no longer needed by the patient, only 84% of respondents report disposing opioids upon discontinuation. Overall, a high compliance rate was seen among hospice programs indicating such regulation is manageable to meet.

Using Lean Six Sigma to Improve Controlled Drug Processes and Release Nursing Time.

BACKGROUND: Hospital controlled drug processes are established to adhere to legislation, with little consideration of efficiency of processes. LOCAL PROBLEM: A controlled drug process existed, where nurses requested a porter to collect a hand-written order; however, only 19% of drug orders were processed this way. Instead, an unscheduled, ad hoc process led to an average of 17 nurse journeys to pharmacy daily. We aimed to reduce nurse journeys to the pharmacy by 25% to release nursing time. METHODS: A pre-/postintervention design was used with Lean Six Sigma methods. INTERVENTIONS: A multifaceted intervention involved process redesign, increasing the frequency of a porter-led delivery service, amending delivery times to reflect times of greatest need, and streamlining checking requirements. RESULTS: Following implementation, there was a statistically significant 44% decrease in nurse journeys to pharmacy for drug collections, which was maintained after 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional collaboration improving hospital-wide processes can have significant benefits for the release of nursing time.

Historic Leadership.

School nursing practice establishes itself in the midst of both education and nursing philosophies, ethics, standards, laws, and regulations. Treading these two worlds is difficult at times and requires that a school nurse possess a strong foundational knowledge base, seek professional collaboration, and navigate conflicting professional demands in order to promote student and public safety. This article is Part 2 of a four-part series that recounts the inspiring story of a school nurse, Ellen Johnsen, who did just that back in the 1980s in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. Part 2 describes how Ellen's actions led the Broken Arrow Public Schools to revise its unsafe and illegal medication administration policy, which brought the policy into partial compliance with the nurse practice act but culminated in Ellen losing her job. The purpose of this series is to enhance understanding of the legal parameters governing school nurse practice, provide examples of ethical decision making, and review the challenges associated with serving as a leader.

Complicaciones de la hospitalización en personas mayores / Hospital complications in the elderly

No disponible

Los medicamentos falsificados en internet y el proyecto europeo Fakeshare: experiencias y actuaciones en España / Counterfeit medicines in internet and the Fakeshare european project: experiences and activities in Spain

El tráfico ilícito de medicamentos a través de Internet es un problema en auge que afecta a la salud pública. Desde el año 2013, la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS) participa en el proyecto europeo Fakeshare, cofinanciado por la Comisión Europea y coordinado por la Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA). Este proyecto tiene el propósito de coordinar iniciativas desarrolladas contra el suministro ilegal de medicamentos, incluyendo la compraventa a través de sitios web que realizan una actividad ilegal a los robos y otros desvíos de medicamentos al tráfico ilícito. Este artículo presenta las actividades desarrolladas en este ámbito a nivel nacional así como las estrategias y materiales elaborados. Las claves para combatir o hacer frente a la venta ilegal de medicamentos a través de Internet son la colaboración coordinada con todos los agentes implicados, a difusión de campañas de comunicación para concienciar y sensibilizar a consumidores, profesionales sanitarios y organizaciones del sector sobre los riesgos que supone la compra de medicamentos en sitios web ilegales, la creación de bases de datos para compartir la información sobre robos y otros desvíos al mercado ilícito, así como la difusión de las prácticas nacionales a nivel europeo e internacional (AU)

The illicit trafficking of medicines over the Internet is a growing problem that affects public health. Since 2013, the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) participates in the European project Fakeshare, co-funded by the European Commission and coordinated by the Italian Medicines Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, AIFA). This project aims to coordinate initiatives against the illegal supply of medicines, including from purchases through websites engaged in illegal activity, to thefts and other diversions of medicines to the illicit trafficking. This paper presents the activities in that area as well as strategies and elaborated materials at the national level. The keys to fight or face the illegal sale of medicines over the internet are coordinated cooperation with all the stakeholders, development of communication campaigns to raise awareness and sensitize consumers, health professionals and industry organizations about the risks of buying medicines on illegal websites, creating databases to share information on thefts and other deviations to the illegal market and disseminate national practices to combat illicit medicines trafficking at European and international levels (AU)

Four out of ten Spanish GPs declare to prescribe high-doses of beta-lactams in suspected streptococcal pharyngitis / Cuatro de cada diez médicos declaran prescribir dosis altas de betalactámicos ante la sospecha de una faringitis estreptocócica

No disponible

Problemática en la dispensación farmacéutica de analgésicos / No disponible

No disponible

La medicación: talón de Aquiles, también en Atención Primaria / Medication: achilles heel, also in Primary Care

No disponible

A technical analysis of medicines request-related decision making in Brazilian courts.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze judicial requests for medications that are covered by the pharmaceutical assistance components of the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS - Brazilian Unified Health System). METHODS: We analyzed 81 judicial requests for medications in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2009. The details of these cases were obtained electronically from the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo. Directives that regulate pharmaceutical assistance were consulted to identify judicially requested medications that are covered by the SUS. To assess the level of evidence supporting the use of these medications to treat the clinical indications described, we consulted the Thomson Micromedex® database. RESULTS: The number of individual medications requested in each case ranged from 1 to 7; in total, 77 different pharmaceuticals agents were identified. Of the medications requested, 14.3% should have been available through SUS primary care, 19.5% were classified under the exceptionally dispensed medications component of the SUS, and 66.2% were not on any official list. Medications of the exceptionally dispensed medications component showed better clinical evidence when indicated for the treatment of medical conditions covered by the Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines of Brazil's Ministry of Health. CONCLUSIONS: The judicial process has been used to ensure access to medications that are covered by the SUS and to request access to those that are not covered. Our assessment of the level of available evidence reinforces the need for technical analysis in the decision-making process in cases of judicially requested medications.

Rational therapeutics: health-related elements in lawsuits demanding medicines.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the main medical, scientific and health-related procedural elements upon which decisions are made in individual lawsuits demanding medicines that are considered essential to the Court of Justice. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study based on 27 cases ruled on by the Court of Appeals in Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2006. The original proceedings were solicited from the Central Archive of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro and were photographed and analyzed in full. RESULTS: Prescriptions and medical certificates were present in 100% of the lawsuits. All prescriptions lacked conformity to legislation. No expert medical reports were added, and only 7.4% of the lawsuits presented complementary examinations. In spite of the scarcity of medical information present in the records, all of the demands were granted. CONCLUSIONS: The admission of judicial demands devoid of clinical and diagnostic substantiation results in managerial and health-related constraints on the health system. Besides creating havoc in standard pharmaceutical services, badly justified medicine demands may compromise rational drug use.

[Conflicts and impasses in the judicialization of the supply of medicines: circuit court rulings on claims brought against the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2005]. / Conflitos e impasses da judicialização na obtenção de medicamentos: as decisões de 1 feminine instância nas ações individuais contra o Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, em 2005.

Based on an analysis of individual claims for provision of medicines brought by users of the Unified National Health System (SUS) against the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the year 2005, this study aims to discuss the action and behavior of the court system in ruling on these suits. The study adopted a semi-qualitative exploratory documental research design, analyzing key aspects related to the claims, such as type of medication claimed by the plaintiff, wording of the court rulings, and the key elements used by judges in trying the cases. According to the analysis of the lawsuits and the concepts of judicialization and official standardization of medicines, the study concludes that when ruling on the provision of medicines, the court system grants the claims as submitted without considering the standardization of medicines adopted by the Ministry of Health, thus exercising excessive court intervention in health policy.

Conflitos e impasses da judicialização na obtenção de medicamentos: as decisões de 1ª instância nas ações individuais contra o Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, em 2005 / Conflicts and impasses in the judicialization of the supply of medicines: circuit court rulings on claims brought against the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2005

Partindo-se de uma análise das ações judiciais individuais para o fornecimento de medicamentos propostas por usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) contra o Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, no ano de 2005, este estudo tem como objetivo discutir a atuação e o comportamento do Poder Judiciário no julgamento dos referidos processos judiciais. O estudo corresponde a uma pesquisa documental exploratória, de caráter quali-quantitativo, na qual foram analisados alguns aspectos relacionados às ações judiciais, tais como, o tipo de medicamento pleiteado, o teor das decisões proferidas e os fundamentos mais freqüentes utilizados pelos magistrados no julgamento das ações. Com base no resultado da análise das ações, do conceito de judicialização e da padronização oficial em matéria de medicamentos, concluiu-se que, ao decidir sobre o fornecimento de medicamentos, o Poder Judiciário concede os pedidos formulados sem considerar a padronização de medicamentos adotada pelo Ministério da Saúde, exercendo assim uma excessiva intervenção na política de saúde.

Based on an analysis of individual claims for provision of medicines brought by users of the Unified National Health System (SUS) against the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the year 2005, this study aims to discuss the action and behavior of the court system in ruling on these suits. The study adopted a semi-qualitative exploratory documental research design, analyzing key aspects related to the claims, such as type of medication claimed by the plaintiff, wording of the court rulings, and the key elements used by judges in trying the cases. According to the analysis of the lawsuits and the concepts of judicialization and official standardization of medicines, the study concludes that when ruling on the provision of medicines, the court system grants the claims as submitted without considering the standardization of medicines adopted by the Ministry of Health, thus exercising excessive court intervention in health policy.

[The "pharmaceutical chain", important asset of health safety in France. Synthesis of the session]. / La "chaîne pharmaceutique", atout essentiel de sécurité sanitaire en France. Synthèse de la séance.

The National Academy of Pharmacy underlines the importance of health safety guarantees, provided by the "pharmaceutical chain" that bring the medicine until his user (from manufacturers to dispensing pharmacists), chain of which the security of each link is controlled and guaranteed by pharmacists. The first of the safety rules lies in the very fast availability of the medicine for the patients, in every respect of the national territory, due to an efficient system of pharmaceutical distribution and to a tightened network of pharmaceutical dispensaries (that constitutes a network of expertises especially to the service of patients and public health). All along the chain, also exists a same concern to guarantee and to preserve the pharmaceutical quality of the medicines. An essential element of the health safety is the right usage of the medicine, to which contribute: information associated with the marketing of the medicine, the very important role of the dispensing pharmacist as such sanitary adviser and therapeutic education teacher, the intervention of the hospital dispensary in clinical pharmacy, the "Pharmaceutical File" under setting up, pharmacovigilance, traceability of medicines ... Pharmacists, responsible at the level of the different steps of the chain, get appropriate skills, carry out themselves their duties and are responsible in front of the National Board of Pharmacists, and their common professional knowledge reinforces the cohesion and the robustness of the chain. Facing the serious issue of counterfeiting of medicines, the pharmaceutical chain constitutes an important line of defence against the entry of counterfeited drugs into commercial channels. The academy of Pharmacy warns against all evolution that would consist to break, even partially, of the mandatory and continuous pharmaceutical control.