Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.752
Filter
1.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1281940, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835779

ABSTRACT

Background: The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results: A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Machine Learning , Melanoma , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(5): e13739, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death (PCD) pathways play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM). Understanding their prognostic significance and clinical implications is imperative for the development of personalized treatment strategies. METHODS: A total of 1466 PCD-related genes were analyzed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-SKCM cohort (n = 353). Prognostic cell death index (CDI) was established and validated through survival analysis and predictive modeling. Functional enrichment, protein-protein interaction (PPI), consensus clustering, and tumor microenvironment assessment and drug sensitivity analysis were performed to elucidate the biological and clinical relevance of CDI. RESULTS: CDI effectively stratified SKCM patients into high and low-risk groups, demonstrating significant differences in survival outcomes. It exhibited predictive value for survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. The concordance index (C-index) was 0.794 in the training set, and 0.792 and 0.821 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The corresponding area under curve (AUC) was all above 0.75 in these data sets. Functional enrichment analysis revealed significant associations with immune response and inflammatory processes. PPI analysis identified key molecular modules associated with apoptosis and chemokine signaling. Consensus clustering unveiled three discernible subtypes demonstrating notable disparities in survival outcomes based on CDI expression profiles. Assessment of the tumor microenvironment highlighted correlations with immune cell infiltration such as M1 macrophages and T cells. Drug sensitivity analysis indicated tight correlations between CDI levels and response to immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive analysis establishes the prognostic significance of PCD-related genes in SKCM. CDI emerges as a promising prognostic biomarker, offering insights into tumor biology and potential implications for personalized treatment strategies. Further validation and clinical integration of CDI are warranted to improve SKCM management and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Microenvironment/genetics , Prognosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant , Transcriptome , Apoptosis/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Survival Analysis
3.
South Med J ; 117(5): 235-240, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701843

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compared incidence rates, stage at presentation, and cause-specific mortality of nodular and superficial spreading melanoma along the rural-urban continuum in Kentucky. We compared resulting patterns in our data with sample demographic and other potential factors, including population by county and primary care provider rate. METHODS: Retrospective patient data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 through 2017. These data were supplemented by environmental, demographic, and socioeconomic data derived from publicly accessible databases. Correlation and χ2 analyses were used to test for significant differences in outcome variables by US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC) categories and other potential predictor variables. RESULTS: Incidence rates by Kentucky county were not associated with RUCC or population; likewise, there was no relationship between stage at presentation and RUCC category. There was, however, a highly significant association between cause-specific mortality and RUCC; patients from rural areas were significantly more likely to die from melanoma than those in urban areas. This overall difference was due to differences in mortality for superficial spreading melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a disparity in patients' ability or tendency to access primary care and/or specialist providers postdiagnosis may be critical factors in determining the ultimate outcome of a melanoma diagnosis. Further studies should explore the availability of dermatologists and/or treatment options for melanoma in rural areas. Our data also provide additional support for inclusion of melanoma subtype in the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Melanoma , Rural Population , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Kentucky/epidemiology , Incidence , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Aged , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
4.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 273, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent data reveal a marked rise in the detection and mortality rates of Desmoplastic Malignant Melanoma (DMM). This trend underscores the imperative for an in-depth analysis of DMM's epidemiology, which is crucial for the formulation of precise medical and public health strategies. This investigation seeks to elucidate the variations in the incidence and mortality of DMM over a 15-year period (2005-2019). METHODS: Data on DMM patients was sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both incidence and incidence-based mortality rates (IBM) were directly extracted from the SEER database. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze and calculate the average annual percent change (AAPC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2019, 3,384 DMM cases were identified, boasting an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.3 cases per 1000,000 person-years (95% CI 3.51-3.76) and an IBM of 1.65cases per 1000,000 person-years (95% CI 1.57-1.74). Of these, 2,353 were males (69.53%) and 1,031 were females (30.47%). There were 1894 patients (55.97%) who were over 70 years old. Predominantly, DMM lesions manifested in exposed areas: Limbs (955, 28.22%), Face (906, 26.77%), and Scalp and Neck (865, 25.56%). The incidence of DMM increased significantly at a rate of APC = 0.9% during 2005-2019, while the incidence-based mortality showed a significant upward trend (APC = 7%) during 2005-2012, and slowly increasing trend (APC = 0.6%) during 2012-2019. In contrast to the modest upward trajectory in female incidence and mortality, male incidence initially surged, later declining, while male mortality peaked and stabilized post-2012. The primary sites for incidence and mortality were chronically sun-exposed areas: Face, Scalp and Neck, and Limbs. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the incidence and incidence-based mortality of DMM have significantly increased. Each subgroup analysis has different trends, and these trends can provide better support for our exploration of DMM.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , SEER Program , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Male , Female , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Middle Aged , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , United States/epidemiology , Adolescent , Young Adult , Regression Analysis , Child , Child, Preschool
5.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 244, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795247

ABSTRACT

Melanoma, accounting for a significant proportion of skin cancer-related deaths, has variable survival outcomes based on the stage at diagnosis and treatment efficacy. Traditional treatments, while effective, pose risks of scarring and systemic side effects. Laser therapy offers an emerging non-surgical alternative, with CO2 lasers particularly showing promise in palliative care.A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, focusing on laser therapy for melanoma treatment. The search included studies on both stand-alone and adjunct laser therapies, with inclusion criteria requiring peer-reviewed articles detailing treatment outcomes for primary, recurrent, or metastatic melanoma.The literature shows that laser therapy for melanoma falls into four major types when categorized by laser medium: solid-state, diode, pulse-dye, and gas (CO2). Data on solid-state lasers for melanoma are limited and their use remains controversial. However, one study with high-energy pulsed neodymium lasers reported a 5-year survival of 82.9% with minimal adverse effects for primary melanoma. CO2 laser therapy has been effective for palliative treatment, with one study showing 54.8% of patients with recurrent melanoma surviving 5.4 years post-ablation. For metastatic melanoma, numerous studies have shown that CO2 laser therapy can provide symptomatic relief and disease control. Combination therapies using lasers and immune-based therapies have demonstrated enhanced outcomes and immune activation, highlighting the potential of laser therapies in melanoma management.While traditional treatments remain the standard for primary melanoma, laser therapies, particularly CO2 laser ablation, show substantial promise in palliative care for metastatic melanoma. Careful patient selection and assessment are crucial for achieving positive outcomes.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Palliative Care , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/surgery , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Treatment Outcome , Lasers, Gas/therapeutic use , Lasers, Gas/adverse effects , Laser Therapy/methods , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
6.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(5): 275, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796605

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Adjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade(ICB) has greatly reduced the risk of recurrence and metastatic spread in early and advanced melanoma. However, not all patients benefit from adjuvant treatment: many patients show disease recurrence despite therapy, while those without recurrence harbor the risk for potentially irreversible adverse events. Biomarkers to select patients benefitting most from adjuvant therapy are currently lacking. As body composition assessment using CT images has shown promising results as a prognostic biomarker in stage IV melanoma, we aim to study the applicability of body composition parameters also in adjuvant melanoma treatment. METHODS: We analyze body composition features via CT scans in a retrospective cohort of 109 patients with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma receiving an adjuvant first-line treatment with ICB in our department. In this analysis, we focus on the impact of body composition, especially the presence of low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM), on patients' survival and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In uni- and multivariate analyses, we identify an association between CT-measured LSMM and melanoma-specific survival in patients treated with adjuvant ICB. Furthermore, LSMM is associated with a lower risk for therapy-related AEs, especially hypothyroidism, fatigue, and xerostomia. Conventional serological biomarkers e.g. S100 and LDH and measures of adipose tissue compartments did not show a correlation with survival or the occurrence of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: LSMM constitutes a novel biomarker for melanoma-specific survival in patients treated with adjuvant ICB.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma , Muscle, Skeletal , Humans , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/therapy , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Body Composition , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(7): 116, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713408

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for resected stage III/IV melanoma based on the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial. This analysis compared outcomes from CheckMate 238 with those from the real-world Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab. MATERIALS: Outcomes included baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS) in the CheckMate 238 cohort (randomization until death or last known alive), and real-world overall survival (rwOS) in the Flatiron Health cohort (nivolumab initiation until death or data cutoff). rwOS was compared with OS using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was combined with the adjusted model to reduce baseline discrepancies. RESULTS: The CheckMate 238 and real-world cohorts included 369 and 452 patients, respectively (median age, 56.0 and 63.0 years; median follow-up, 61.4 vs. 25.5 months). rwOS was not different from OS in the unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% CI 0.92-1.74), adjusted (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.67-1.54), and adjusted IPTW (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.63) analyses. In the adjusted analysis, 2-year OS and rwOS rates were 84%. Median OS and rwOS were not reached. After IPTW, OS and rwOS were not different (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative analysis, OS in the CheckMate 238 trial was similar to rwOS in the Flatiron Health database after adjustments in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab, validating the trial results.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Aged , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Adult
8.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(9): 3463-3472, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Every year, melanoma claims over 20,000 lives in Europe. In Montenegro, as in Europe, numerous campaigns have been initiated to raise public awareness about the importance of melanoma prevention and its early detection. Thus, accompanying current diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, new methods of melanoma diagnosis and treatment have been implemented. Studying the trend enables the identification of the groups most burdened by mortality and assesses whether there has been a change in trends based on interventions aiming to reduce mortality. The objective of this study is to evaluate the mortality trend from cutaneous melanoma in Montenegro for the period 1990-2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have utilized national data on the causes of death from melanoma, code 179 from the ninth and C43 from the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases, categorized by gender and age groups. The study utilized various regression techniques, including Joinpoint regression in the Joinpoint Program, Poisson regression, and linear regression in the SPSS 26th Program, to describe the trend. RESULTS: In Montenegro, during the period from 1990 to 2018, a total of 281 individuals died (51.6% male and 48.4% female). This ranks as the 13th leading cancer in terms of mortality among all cancers. The average age-standardized rate was 1.1 deaths per 100,000 (1.2 for males and 1.0 for females).  The number of death cases has been increasing on average by 3.3% annually [average annual percentage change (AAPC) (95% CI) = 3.3 (1.7-4.9); p<0.001] on an overall level and by 5.4% annually among males [AAPC (95% CI) = 5.4 (3.6-7.3); p<0.001] due to the rises in the age groups 55-64 years and 65-74 years with an average annual percent change of respectively 3.2% [AAPC (95% CI) = 3.2 (0.8-5.8); p=0.012] and 5.4% [AAPC (95% CI) = 5.4 (2.7-8.1); p<0.001] overall level, and 4.8% [AAPC (95% CI) = 4.8 (2.4-7.3); p<0.001] and 7.5% [AAPC (95% CI) = 7.5 (4.9-10.2); p<0.001] among males. For females, an increase of 1.1% was recorded, which was not statistically significant [AAPC (95% CI) = 1.1 (-0.8-3.0); p=0.255]. Furthermore, there was a noted increase in the rates at an overall level [ß (95% CI) = 0.027 (0.008-0.046); p=0.007] and in the age group 65-74 years [ß (95% CI) = 0.249 (0.090-0.407); p=0.003], as well as among males at an overall level [ß (95% CI) = 0.052 (0.025-0.079); p<0.001] and for age groups 45-54 years [ß (95% CI) = 0.102 (0.011-0.193); p=0.030] and 65-74 [ß (95% CI) = 0.410 (0.144-0.676); p=0.004]. In contrast, the rates for females remained constant. The three age groups most burdened by melanoma skin cancer mortality are 65-74 years (23.5%), 55-64 years (21.7%) and 75-84 years  (19.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of regression analyses indicate a significant rise in both the number of death cases and mortality rates overall, specifically among males in Montenegro. In females, however, the increase in the number of death cases and rates is not statistically significant. Preventive campaign activities should be redirected towards the most vulnerable groups in terms of mortality, namely males and the elderly population.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/epidemiology , Montenegro/epidemiology , Male , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over
9.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 219, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787413

ABSTRACT

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is malignant cancer known for its high aggressiveness and unfavorable prognosis, particularly in advanced tumors. Anoikis is a specific pattern of programmed cell death associated with tumor regeneration, migration, and metastasis. Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted to investigate the function of anoikis in SKCM. Anoikis-related genes (ARGs) were extracted from Genecards to identify SKCM subtypes and to explore the immune microenvironment between the different subtypes. Prognostic models of SKCM were developed by LASSO COX regression analysis. Subsequently, the predictive value of risk scores in SKCM and the association with immunotherapy were further explored. Finally, the expression of 6 ARGs involved in the model construction was detected by immunohistochemistry and PCR. This study identified 20 ARGs significantly associated with SKCM prognosis and performed disease subtype analysis of samples based on these genes, different subtypes exhibited significantly different clinical features and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) landscapes. The risk score prognostic model was generated by further screening and identification of the six ARGs. The model exhibited a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to predict the prognosis of individuals with SKCM. These high- and low-risk populations showed different immune statuses and drug sensitivity. Further immunohistochemical and PCR experiments identified significant differential expression of the six ARGs in tumor and normal samples. Anoikis-based features may serve as novel prognostic biomarkers for SKCM and may provide important new insights for survival prediction and individualized treatment development.


Subject(s)
Anoikis , Biomarkers, Tumor , Immunotherapy , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Prognosis , Immunotherapy/methods , Female , Male , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant , Middle Aged , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
10.
Eur J Cancer ; 204: 114073, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723373

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib and encorafenib monotherapy is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We report results from the 7-year analysis of COLUMBUS part 1 (NCT01909453) at 99.7 months (median duration between randomization and data cutoff). METHODS: 577 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who were treatment-naive or progressed after first-line immunotherapy were randomized 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily (QD) plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 192), vemurafenib 960 mg BID (n = 191), or encorafenib monotherapy 300 mg QD (n = 194). No prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor was allowed. RESULTS: Seven-year PFS and OS rates (95 % CI) were 21.2 % (14.7-28.4 %) and 27.4 % (21.2-33.9%) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 6.4 % (2.1-14.0 %) and 18.2 % (12.8-24.3 %) in the vemurafenib arm, respectively. Median melanoma-specific survival (95 % CI) was 36.8 months (27.7-51.5 months) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 19.3 months (14.8-25.9 months) in the vemurafenib arm. Thirty-four long-term responders (complete/partial response ongoing at 7 years) were identified across arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the longest follow-up from a phase III trial of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. Safety results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Results support the long-term efficacy and known safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this population and provide new insights on long-term responders. Interactive data visualization is available at the COLUMBUS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/columbus7/).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Benzimidazoles , Carbamates , Melanoma , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Sulfonamides , Vemurafenib , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Carbamates/administration & dosage , Carbamates/adverse effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Male , Female , Vemurafenib/administration & dosage , Vemurafenib/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Progression-Free Survival , Young Adult
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(18): e38021, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701273

ABSTRACT

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare but aggressive malignant ocular tumor with a high metastatic potential and limited therapeutic options, currently lacking accurate prognostic predictors and effective individualized treatment strategies. Public databases were utilized to analyze the prognostic relevance of programmed cell death-related genes (PCDRGs) in UM transcriptomes and survival data. Consensus clustering and Lasso Cox regression analysis were performed for molecular subtyping and risk feature construction. The PCDRG-derived index (PCDI) was evaluated for its association with clinicopathological features, gene expression, drug sensitivity, and immune infiltration. A total of 369 prognostic PCDRGs were identified, which could cluster UM into 2 molecular subtypes with significant differences in prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, a risk feature PCDI composed of 11 PCDRGs was constructed, capable of indicating prognosis in UM patients. Additionally, PCDI exhibited correlations with the sensitivity to 25 drugs and the infiltration of various immune cells. Enrichment analysis revealed that PCDI was associated with immune regulation-related biological processes and pathways. Finally, a nomogram for prognostic assessment of UM patients was developed based on PCDI and gender, demonstrating excellent performance. This study elucidated the potential value of PCDRGs in prognostic assessment for UM and developed a corresponding risk feature. However, further basic and clinical studies are warranted to validate the functions and mechanisms of PCDRGs in UM.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Uveal Neoplasms , Humans , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/mortality , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Prognosis , Male , Female , Nomograms , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Transcriptome , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Middle Aged
12.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv27571, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655656

ABSTRACT

The prognostic value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in patients with melanoma has yielded controversial results in the literature. A retrospective single-centre cohort study was conducted from 1998 to 2020, including patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma. A total of 2,721 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up was 8.23 years (IQR 4.41-13.25). The median baseline neutrophil- lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio values increased significantly (p < 0.001) with the increasing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. The optimal cut-off values for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio were determined as 2.1, 184 and 0.2, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, high levels of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (≥ 2.1), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (≥ 184) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (≥ 0.2) were independently associated with significantly shorter melanoma-specific survival (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.60, p = 0.013; platelet-lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.76, p = 0.014; monocyte- lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.58, p = 0.015) and overall survival (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.19-1.64, p < 0.001; platelet- lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19-1.74, p < 0.001; monocyte-lymphocyte ratio: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.66, p < 0.001). High levels of neutrophil- lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio were also associated with poor relapse-free survival, while platelet-lymphocyte ratio was not. In conclusion, baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio were identified as independent predictors for the prognosis of melanoma.


Subject(s)
Lymphocytes , Melanoma , Monocytes , Neutrophils , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/blood , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/immunology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/blood , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Prognosis , Lymphocyte Count , Platelet Count , Blood Platelets/pathology , Aged , Adult , Predictive Value of Tests , Leukocyte Count , Neoplasm Staging , Time Factors
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9146, 2024 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644411

ABSTRACT

Uveal melanoma (UVM) is the most common primary tumor in adult human eyes. Costimulatory molecules (CMs) are important in maintaining T cell biological functions and regulating immune responses. To investigate the role of CMs in UVM and exploit prognostic signature by bioinformatics analysis. This study aimed to identify and validate a CMs associated signature and investigate its role in the progression and prognosis of UVM. The expression profile data of training cohort and validation cohort were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset. 60 CM genes were identified, and 34 genes were associated with prognosis by univariate Cox regression. A prognostic signature was established with six CM genes. Further, high- and low-risk groups were divided by the median, and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves indicated that high-risk patients presented a poorer prognosis. We analyzed the correlation of gender, age, stage, and risk score on prognosis by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. We found that risk score was the only risk factor for prognosis. Through the integration of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), it was found that the high-risk group presented more immune cell infiltration and expression of immune checkpoints and obtained higher immune scores. Enrichment analysis of the biological functions of the two groups revealed that the differential parts were mainly related to cell-cell adhesion, regulation of T-cell activation, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. No differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) were found between the two groups. GNA11 and BAP1 have higher mutation frequencies in high-risk patients. Finally, based on the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer 2 (GDSC2) dataset, drug sensitivity analysis found that high-risk patients may be potential beneficiaries of the treatment of crizotinib or temozolomide. Taken together, our CM-related prognostic signature is a reliable biomarker that may provide ideas for future treatments for the disease.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Melanoma , Uveal Neoplasms , Humans , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/mortality , Uveal Neoplasms/immunology , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/pathology , Prognosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Transcriptome , Kaplan-Meier Estimate
14.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1220-1228, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Meningeal melanocytomas are rare tumors of the central nervous system and optimal treatment needs further clarification. This study compared subtotal resection (STR), STR plus radiation therapy (RT), gross total resection (GTR), and GTR+RT to better define the role of postoperative RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All cases reported in the literature were reviewed. Patients (n=184) with complete data were analyzed for local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: On univariate analysis, GTR (vs. STR) was associated with improved LC (p=0.016). When comparing the treatment regimens, best and worst results were found after GTR+RT and STR alone, respectively (p<0.001). On univariate analysis, GTR resulted in better OS than STR (p=0.041). Moreover, the treatment regimen had a significant impact on OS (p=0.049). On multivariate analyses of LC and OS, extent of resection and treatment regimen were found to be significant factors. After STR, RT significantly improved LC but not OS. After GTR, RT did not significantly improve LC or OS. CONCLUSION: GTR was significantly superior to STR regarding LC and OS. STR+RT resulted in significantly better LC when compared to STR alone.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Meningeal Neoplasms , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Meningeal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Male , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37966, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669390

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve the survival outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma. However, response varies among from patient to patient and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. We integrated mutational profiles from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and clinicopathologic characteristics of melanoma patients to investigate whether tumor genomic profiling contribute to clinical benefit of ICIs treatment. The majority of genes identified with high mutation frequency have all been reported as well-known immunotherapy-related genes. Thirty-five patients (43.2%) had at least 1 BRAF/RAS/NF1 mutation. The other 46 (56.8%) melanomas without BRAF/RAS/NF1 mutation were classified as Triple-WT. We identified mutational signature 6 (known as associated with defective DNA mismatch repair) among cases in this cohort. Compared to patients with PD-L1 expression (TPS < 1%), patients with PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) had significantly higher median progression-free survival (mPFS), but no significantly higher durable clinical benefit (DCB) rate. In contrast, FAT1, ATM, BRCA2, LRP1B, and PBRM1 mutations only occurred frequently in patients with DCB, irrespective of PD-L1 expression status. Our study explored molecular signatures of melanoma patients who respond to ICIs treatment and identified a series of mutated genes that might serve as predictive biomarker for ICIs responses in melanoma.


Subject(s)
Cadherins , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma , Mutation , Neurofibromin 1 , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Receptors, LDL , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Male , Female , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , Adult , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Progression-Free Survival , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37900, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669429

ABSTRACT

Anoikis is considered strongly associated with a biological procession of tumors. Herein, we utilized anoikis-related genes (ARGs) to predict the prognosis and immunotherapeutic efficacy for skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM). RNA-seq data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. After dividing patients into novel subtypes based on the expression of prognostic ARGs, K-M survival was conducted to compare the survival status. Subsequently, differentially expressed ARGs were identified and the predictive model was established. The predictive effects were validated using the areas under the curve about the receiver operating characteristic. Moreover, tumor mutation burden, the enriched functional pathway, immune cells and functions, and the immunotherapeutic response were also analyzed and compared. The distribution of model genes at cell level was visualized by the single-cell seq with tumor immune single-cell hub database. Patients of The Cancer Genome Atlas-SKCM cohort were divided into 2 clusters, the cluster 1 performed a better prognosis. Cluster 2 was more enriched in metabolism-related pathways whereas cluster 1 was more associated with immune pathways. A predictive risk model was established with 6 ARGs, showing the areas under the curves of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ROC were 0.715, 0,720, and 0.731, respectively. Moreover, risk score was negatively associated with tumor mutation burden and immune-related pathways enrichment. In addition, patients with high-risk scores performed immunosuppressive status but the decreasing scores enhanced immune cell infiltration, immune function activation, and immunotherapeutic response. In this study, we established a novel signature in predicting prognosis and immunotherapy. It can be considered reliable to formulate the complex treatment for SKCM patients.


Subject(s)
Anoikis , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Anoikis/genetics , Prognosis , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant , Male , Female , Immunotherapy/methods , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9623, 2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671023

ABSTRACT

For patients with upper limb melanoma, the significance of specific death is more important than that of all-cause death, and traditional survival analysis may overestimate the mortality rate of patients. Therefore, the nomogram model for predicting the specific mortality risk of melanoma in the upper limbs was developed. A population with melanoma in the upper limbs, diagnosed from 2010 to 2015, were selected from the National Cancer Institute database of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). The independent predictive factors of specific death were confirmed by the competing risk model of one-factor analysis and multi-factor analysis, and the nomogram was constructed according to the independent predictive factors. 17,200 patients with upper limb melanoma were enrolled in the study (training cohort: n = 12,040; validation cohort: n = 5160). Multi-factor analysis of the competing risk model showed that age, marital status, gender, tumor stage, T stage, M stage, regional lymph node surgery information, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, mitotic cell count, ulcer and whether there were multiple primary cancers, were independent factors affecting the specific death of upper limb melanoma patients (P < 0.05). The nomogram has good predictive ability regarding the specific mortality risk of melanoma in the upper limbs, and could be of great help to formulate prognostic treatment strategies and follow-up strategies that are conducive to survival.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Nomograms , SEER Program , Upper Extremity , Humans , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Upper Extremity/pathology , Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Databases, Factual , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent
18.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(4)2024 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma do not benefit sufficiently from adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy, as they either recur despite therapy or would never have recurred. To better inform adjuvant treatment selection, we have performed translational analyses to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma from an ongoing biobank study were included. Clinical data were compared between an observation cohort (cohort 1) and an adjuvant intention cohort (cohort 2). RNA sequencing for translational analyses was performed and treatment subgroups (cohort 1A and cohort 2A) were compared for possible biomarkers, using a cut-off based on the treatment-naïve patients. In addition, two validation cohorts (Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU)) were obtained. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 26 months of the 98 patients in our discovery set, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly longer for the adjuvant intention cohort (cohort 2, n=49) versus the observation cohort (cohort 1, n=49). Median overall survival was not reached for either cohort, nor significantly different. In observation cohort 1A (n=24), RFS was significantly longer for patients with high interferon-gamma (IFNγ) score (p=0.002); for adjuvant patients of cohort 2A (n=24), a similar trend was observed (p=0.086). Patients with high B cell score had a longer RFS in cohort 1A, but no difference was seen in cohort 2A. The B cell score based on RNA correlated with CD20+ cells in tumor area but was not independent from the IFNγ score. In the MIA validation cohort (n=44), longer RFS was observed for patients with high IFNγ score compared with low IFNγ score (p=0.046), no difference in RFS was observed according to the B cell score. In both the observation (n=11) and the adjuvant (n=11) UMCU validation cohorts, no difference in RFS was seen for IFNγ and B cell. CONCLUSIONS: IFNγ has shown to be a prognostic marker in both patients who were and were not treated with adjuvant therapy. B cell score was prognostic but did not improve accuracy over IFNγ. Our study confirmed RFS benefit of adjuvant anti-PD-1 for patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma.


Subject(s)
Interferon-gamma , Melanoma , Neoplasm Staging , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Prognosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
19.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(6): 501-506, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with melanoma is highly dependent on staging, early detection, and early intervention. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to investigate the impact of surgical delay (time between diagnostic biopsy and definitive surgical excision) on melanoma-specific outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted from Embase (1974-present), MEDLINE (1946-present), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2005-present), Scopus, and Web of Science. A total of 977 studies were included for review after removal of duplicates. A total of 10 studies were included for final analysis. RESULTS: In total, 70% (7/10) of the studies found that longer wait times between initial biopsy and surgical intervention are correlated with lower overall survival. Among the 9 studies that reported overall survival as a percentage, the median and SD overall survival was 82% ± 5.87. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that prolonged surgical delay in patients diagnosed with Stage I cutaneous melanoma is associated with worsened overall mortality, whereas the effect of surgical delay on overall mortality in Stages II and III melanomas is uncertain. Future prospective studies and randomized clinical trials are needed to better define the appropriate surgical wait times between biopsy and surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Time-to-Treatment , Humans , Melanoma/surgery , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Biopsy , Time Factors , Survival Rate
20.
Respir Med ; 227: 107640, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648910

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoid-like reactions (SLRs) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a rare but increasingly recognized immune-related adverse event of which the clinical significance is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center of consecutive patients who received at least one dose of ICI from 2013 to 2020. Patient characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without SLR following ICI treatment. RESULTS: A total of 2963 cancer patients received at least 1 dose of ICI between 2013 and 2020, and 7 patients (0.24 %) developed SLR. There were no significant demographic differences between patients with and without SLR following ICI. SLRs occurred in 5 of 451 (1.07 %) melanoma patients and 2 of 840 (0.24 %) non-small cell lung cancer patients. Two of the 7 patients had multi-organ SLR, and both were symptomatic requiring systemic corticosteroids and permanent ICI discontinuation, while single organ SLR patients did not require immune suppression. Development of SLR did not appear to have negative impact on cancer progression or overall survival; in fact, a trend towards improved progression-free and overall survival was observed (median time: 1363 days vs 127 days, p = 0.091; 1387 days vs 428.5 days, p = 0.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SLRs are a known but understudied complication associated with ICI therapy. Multisystem SLR patients were more symptomatic and required ICI discontinuation and immune suppression. Larger studies are needed to fully evaluate the impact of SLR on cancer outcomes.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Disease Progression , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Sarcoidosis , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Incidence , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Risk Factors , Cohort Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...