Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 526
Filter
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 214, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740641

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Meningioma is one of the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system. To describe the epidemiology of meningioma operated in France and, to assess grading and histopathological variability among the different neurosurgical centres. METHODS: We processed the French Brain Tumour Database (FBTDB) to conduct a nationwide population-based study of all histopathologically confirmed meningiomas between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: 30,223 meningiomas cases were operated on 28,424 patients, in 61 centres. The average number of meningioma operated per year in France was 3,022 (SD ± 122). Meningioma was 3 times more common in women (74.1% vs. 25.9%). The incidence of meningioma increased with age and, mean age at surgery was 58.5 ± 13.9 years. Grade 1, 2, and 3 meningiomas accounted for 83.9%, 13.91% and, 2.19% respectively. There was a significant variability of meningioma grading by institutions, especially for grade 2 which spanned from 5.1% up to 22.4% (p < 0.001). Moreover, the proportion of grade 2 significantly grew over the study period (p < 0.001). There was also a significant variation in grade 1 subtypes diagnosis among the institutions (p < 0.001). 89.05% of the patients had solely one meningioma surgery, 8.52% two and, 2.43% three or more. The number of surgeries was associated to the grade of malignancy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of meningioma surgery increased with age and, peaked at 58.5 years. They were predominantly benign with meningothelial subtype being the most common. However, there was a significant variation of grade 1 subtypes diagnosis among the centres involved. The proportion of grade 2 meningioma significantly grew over the study time, on contrary to malignant meningioma proportion, which remained rare and, stable over time around 2%. Likewise, there was a significant variability of grade 2 meningioma rate among the institutions.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/pathology , Meningioma/surgery , France/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Adult , Incidence , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Grading , Young Adult , Adolescent , Databases, Factual
2.
ESMO Open ; 9(5): 103447, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer that metastasizes to the brain. Particularly up to half of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may develop brain metastases over the course of the disease. Nevertheless, little is known about the prevalence and the outcome of brain and leptomeningeal metastases (BLMM) in HER2-low BC. We compared the cumulative incidence of BLMM and associated outcomes among patients with HER2-low, HER2-negative (HER2-) and HER2+ mBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) mBC database and included patients treated for mBC between 2012 and 2020 across 18 French comprehensive cancer centers and with known HER2 and hormone receptor (HR) status. The cumulative incidence of BLMM after metastatic diagnosis was estimated using a competing risk methodology with death defined as a competing event. RESULTS: 19 585 patients were included with 6118 (31.2%), 9943 (50.8%) and 3524 (18.0%) being HER2-low, HER2- and HER2+ mBC, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.7-49.3 months], BLMM were reported in 4727 patients: 1192 (25.2%) were diagnosed with BLMM at first metastatic diagnosis and 3535 (74.8%) after metastatic diagnosis. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, histological grade, metastases-free interval and HR status showed that the risk of BLMM at metastatic diagnosis was similar in patients with HER2- compared to HER2-low mBC [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.00 (0.86-1.17)] and higher in those with HER2+ compared to HER2-low [OR (95% CI) 2.23 (1.87-2.66)]. Similar results were found after metastatic diagnosis; the risk of BLMM was similar in HER2- compared to HER2-low [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) (95% CI) 1.07 (0.98-1.16)] and higher in the HER2+ group [sHR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.41-1.73)]. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and evolution of BLMM in HER2-low mBC are similar to those in patients with HER2- tumors. In contrast to patients with HER2+ mBC, the prognosis of BLMM remains dismal in this population.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , France/epidemiology , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Incidence , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Meningeal Neoplasms/secondary , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Adult
4.
BMJ ; 384: e078078, 2024 03 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of intracranial meningioma associated with the use of selected progestogens. DESIGN: National case-control study. SETTING: French National Health Data System (ie, Système National des Données de Santé). PARTICIPANTS: Of 108 366 women overall, 18 061 women living in France who had intracranial surgery for meningioma between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018 (restricted inclusion periods for intrauterine systems) were deemed to be in the case group. Each case was matched to five controls for year of birth and area of residence (90 305 controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Selected progestogens were used: progesterone, hydroxyprogesterone, dydrogesterone, medrogestone, medroxyprogesterone acetate, promegestone, dienogest, and intrauterine levonorgestrel. For each progestogen, use was defined by at least one dispensation within the year before the index date (within three years for 13.5 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine systems and five years for 52 mg). Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio for each progestogen meningioma association. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.6 years (standard deviation 12.8). Analyses showed excess risk of meningioma with use of medrogestone (42 exposed cases/18 061 cases (0.2%) v 79 exposed controls/90 305 controls (0.1%), odds ratio 3.49 (95% confidence interval 2.38 to 5.10)), medroxyprogesterone acetate (injectable, 9/18 061 (0.05%) v 11/90 305 (0.01%), 5.55 (2.27 to 13.56)), and promegestone (83/18 061 (0.5%) v 225/90 305 (0.2 %), 2.39 (1.85 to 3.09)). This excess risk was driven by prolonged use (≥one year). Results showed no excess risk of intracranial meningioma for progesterone, dydrogesterone, or levonorgestrel intrauterine systems. No conclusions could be drawn concerning dienogest or hydroxyprogesterone because of the small number of individuals who received these drugs. A highly increased risk of meningioma was observed for cyproterone acetate (891/18 061 (4.9%) v 256/90 305 (0.3%), odds ratio 19.21 (95% confidence interval 16.61 to 22.22)), nomegestrol acetate (925/18 061 (5.1%) v 1121/90 305 (1.2%), 4.93 (4.50 to 5.41)), and chlormadinone acetate (628/18 061 (3.5%) v 946/90 305 (1.0%), 3.87 (3.48 to 4.30)), which were used as positive controls for use. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of medrogestone, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and promegestone was found to increase the risk of intracranial meningioma. The increased risk associated with the use of injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate, a widely used contraceptive, and the safety of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems are important new findings.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Progestins/adverse effects , Progesterone , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Meningioma/chemically induced , Meningioma/epidemiology , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Dydrogesterone , Medrogestone , Promegestone , Case-Control Studies , Meningeal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
5.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 239: 108217, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452714

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas frequently occur within the field of neuro-oncology, but it is unclear whether exogenous or imbalanced endogenous hormones are involved in the pathophysiology. A previous case-control study found an almost 20-fold increase in the risk of developing meningioma among users of androgenic anabolic steroids. We, therefore, investigated this hypothesis. METHODS: We compared the incidence rate of meningioma in a cohort of males sanctioned for the use of androgenic anabolic steroids with age- and sex-matched controls with an identical enrollment date. RESULTS: We followed 1189 males sanctioned for using androgenic anabolic steroids for a total of 13,305 person-years and found 0 cases of meningioma. The control cohort of 59,450 males was followed for a total of 654,938 person-years, and 16 were diagnosed with meningioma. Thus, the incidence rate ratio was 0 (95% CI: 0-12.8). CONCLUSION: We did not find any evidence supporting the hypothesis of an increased risk of meningioma development with the use of androgenic anabolic steroids. Due to the limited sample size, we cannot exclude androgenic anabolic steroids as a potential risk factor for meningioma development, despite the lack of apparent evidence in this study.


Subject(s)
Anabolic Agents , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Male , Humans , Androgens/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Meningioma/chemically induced , Meningioma/epidemiology , Anabolic Androgenic Steroids , Anabolic Agents/adverse effects , Meningeal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
6.
ANZ J Surg ; 94(5): 811-818, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361312

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An association between breast cancer and meningioma has been suggested in cohort studies. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there is an association between initial breast cancer and subsequent meningioma diagnosis and vice versa. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, Scopus and Google scholar from inception up to April 2023. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: There were eight studies included in the systematic review. Seven had reported Standardized Incidence Ratio (SIR) for female patients and were suitable for the meta-analysis. Only one study reported SIR for male patients. For the association between initial breast cancer and subsequent meningioma, in 795 000 female patients with follow-up ranging from 7 to 13 years, the SIR was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.20-1.34, P-value <0.00001). For the association between initial meningioma and subsequent breast cancer, in 28 000 female patients with follow-up ranging from 6 to 15 years, the SIR was 1.32 (95% CI: 1.21-1.45, P-value <0.00001). There were low heterogeneity and no significant publication bias. CONCLUSION: There was a small but significant association between initial breast cancer and subsequent meningioma as well as initial meningioma and subsequent breast cancer in female patients. The potential underlying mechanisms and risk factors were unclear from current literature and would be a potential area for future research.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Female , Humans , Male , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Incidence , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningioma/epidemiology
7.
Br J Cancer ; 130(6): 976-986, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of subsequent gliomas and meningiomas, but the risks beyond age 40 years are uncertain. We quantified these risks in the largest ever cohort. METHODS: Using data from 69,460 5-year childhood cancer survivors (diagnosed 1940-2008), across Europe, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and cumulative incidence were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 279 glioma and 761 meningioma were identified. CNS tumour (SIR: 16.2, 95% CI: 13.7, 19.2) and leukaemia (SIR: 11.2, 95% CI: 8.8, 14.2) survivors were at greatest risk of glioma. The SIR for CNS tumour survivors was still 4.3-fold after age 50 (95% CI: 1.9, 9.6), and for leukaemia survivors still 10.2-fold after age 40 (95% CI: 4.9, 21.4). Following cranial radiotherapy (CRT), the cumulative incidence of a glioma in CNS tumour survivors was 2.7%, 3.7% and 5.0% by ages 40, 50 and 60, respectively, whilst for leukaemia this was 1.2% and 1.7% by ages 40 and 50. The cumulative incidence of a meningioma after CRT in CNS tumour survivors doubled from 5.9% to 12.5% between ages 40 and 60, and in leukaemia survivors increased from 5.8% to 10.2% between ages 40 and 50. DISCUSSION: Clinicians following up survivors should be aware that the substantial risks of meningioma and glioma following CRT are sustained beyond age 40 and be vigilant for symptoms.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Glioma , Leukemia , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Meningioma/etiology , Meningioma/complications , Risk Factors , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/epidemiology , Glioma/epidemiology , Survivors , Leukemia/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Incidence
8.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 110, 2024 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: Lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma(LPM) is a rare subtype of meningioma with a low degree of malignancy and an overall preferable prognosis. The purpose of this article is to increase the understanding of the disease, reduce misdiagnosis, and improve prognosis. METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed database for English articles published from 1993 to 2023. The keywords were "lymphoplasmacyte-rich (all fields) and meningioma (all fields) and English (lang)" and "lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma (title/abstract) and English (lang)".We further analyzed the clinical manifestations, imaging manifestations, pathological features, treatment strategies, and prognosis of LPM.The possible prognostic indicators were analyzed by the log-rank test and Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: Fourteen reports with 95 LPM patients were included in this report, including 47 males and 48 females who were diagnosed between the ages of 9 and 79, with an average age of 45 years. The most common clinical manifestations are headache and limb movement disorders. In most cases, the tumor occurred on the convex portion of the brain. All tumors showed significant enhancement, with homogeneous enhancement being more common, and most patients showed peritumoral edema. Postoperative pathological EMA, LCA, and vimentin positivity were helpful for the final diagnosis of the patient. Log-rank tests showed a correlation between complete resection and better prognosis and recurrence. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of significant differences in the clinical symptoms and imaging manifestations of LPM compared to other diseases that need to be differentiated, and a clear diagnosis requires pathological examination. After standardized surgical treatment, the recurrence rate and mortality rate of LPM are both low. Complete surgical resection of tumors is associated with a better prognosis and lower recurrence rate.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Female , Male , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Meningioma/diagnosis , Meningioma/epidemiology , Prognosis , Brain , Databases, Factual , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
9.
J Neurosurg ; 140(6): 1558-1567, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Whether obesity is associated with meningioma and the impact of obesity by gender has been debated. The primary objective of this study was to investigate differences in BMI between male and female patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma and compare those with patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. The secondary objective was to compare meningioma location and progression-free survival (PFS) between obese and nonobese patients in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: National data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Male and female patients were analyzed separately. Patients undergoing craniotomies for meningioma were compared with patients of the same sex undergoing craniotomies for other intracranial tumors. Institutional data from two academic centers were collected for all male and an equivalent number of female meningioma patients undergoing meningioma resection. Multivariate regression controlling for age was used to determine differences in meningioma location. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were computed to investigate differences in PFS. RESULTS: From NSQIP, 4163 male meningioma patients were compared with 24,266 controls, and 9372 female meningioma patients were compared with 21,538 controls. Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection were more likely to be overweight or obese compared with patients undergoing craniotomy for other tumors, with the odds ratio increasing with increasing weight class (all p < 0.0001). In the multi-institutional cohort, meningiomas were more common along the skull base in male patients (p = 0.0123), but not in female patients (p = 0.1246). There was no difference in PFS between obese and nonobese male (p = 0.4104) or female (p = 0.5504) patients. Obesity was associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism in both male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection (p = 0.0043). CONCLUSIONS: Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection are more likely to be obese than patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. Obese males are more likely to have meningiomas in the skull base compared with other locations, but this association was not found in females. There was no significant difference in PFS among obese patients. The mechanism by which obesity increases meningioma incidence remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Obesity , Humans , Meningioma/surgery , Meningioma/epidemiology , Male , Female , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Craniotomy , Adult , Body Mass Index , Sex Factors , Progression-Free Survival
10.
Neuro Oncol ; 26(4): 749-763, 2024 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior literature suggests that individual socioeconomic status (SES) may influence incidence, treatments, and survival of brain tumor cases. We aim to conduct the first national study to evaluate the association between US county-level SES and incidence, treatment, and survival in meningioma. METHODS: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States analytic dataset, which combines data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, was used to identify meningioma cases from 2006 to 2019. SES quintiles were created using American Community Survey data. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between SES and meningioma. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the effect of SES on survival using the NPCR analytic dataset. RESULTS: A total of 409 681 meningioma cases were identified. Meningioma incidence increased with higher county-level SES with Q5 (highest quintile) having a 12% higher incidence than Q1 (incidence rate ratios (IRR) = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.10-1.14; P < .0001). The Hispanic group was the only racial-ethnic group that had lower SES associated with increased meningioma incidence (Q5: age-adjusted incidence ratio (AAIR) = 9.02, 95%CI: 8.87-9.17 vs. Q1: AAIR = 9.33, 95%CI: 9.08-9.59; IRR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.94-1.00; P = .0409). Increased likelihood of surgical treatment was associated with Asian or Pacific Islander non-Hispanic individuals (compared to White non-Hispanic (WNH)) (OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.23-1.33, P < .001) and males (OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.29-1.33, P < .001). Black non-Hispanic individuals (OR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.88-0.92, P < .001) and those residing in metropolitan areas (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.96-0.96, P < .001) were less likely to receive surgical treatment compared to WNH individuals. Overall median survival was 137 months, and survival was higher in higher SES counties (Q5 median survival = 142 months). CONCLUSIONS: Higher county-level SES was associated with increased meningioma incidence, surgical treatment, and overall survival. Racial-ethnic stratification identified potential disparities within the meningioma population. Further work is needed to understand the underpinnings of socioeconomic and racial disparities for meningioma patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Male , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Incidence , Meningioma/epidemiology , Social Class , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
11.
Int J Surg ; 110(2): 921-933, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983808

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Spinal meningiomas (SMs) are relatively rare central nervous system tumors that usually trigger neurological symptoms. The prevalence of SMs is increasing with the aging of the global population. This study aimed to perform a systematic epidemiologic and survival prognostic analysis of SMs to evaluate their public health impact and to develop a novel method to estimate the overall survival at 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year in patients with SMs. METHODS: Five thousand one hundred fifty eight patients with SMs were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2019. Firstly, descriptive analysis was performed on the epidemiology of SMs. Secondly, these individuals were randomly allocated to the training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were utilized in the training set to identify independent prognostic factors and to construct a nomogram for survival prognosis. Subsequently, the discriminative power, predictive performance, and clinical utility of the nomogram were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis. Finally, a mortality risk stratification system and a web-based dynamic nomogram were constructed to quantify the risk of mortality in patients with SMs. RESULTS: The annual age-adjusted incidence rates of SMs increased steadily since 2004, reaching a rate of 0.40 cases per 100 000 population in 2019, with a female-to-male ratio of ~4:1. The age groups of 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years old were the most prevalent ages for SMs, accounting for 19.08, 24.93, and 23.32%, respectively. In addition, seven independent prognostic factors were identified to establish a prognostic nomogram for patients with SMs. The decision curve analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the nomogram had high clinical utility and favorable accuracy. Moreover, the mortality risk stratification system effectively divided patients into low-risk, middle-risk, and high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: SMs are relatively rare benign spinal tumors prevalent in the white elderly female population. Clinicians could use the nomogram to personalize the prediction of the overall survival probability of patients with SMs, categorize these patients into different mortality risk subgroups, and develop personalized decision-making plans. Moreover, the web-based dynamic nomogram could help to further promote clinical application and assist clinicians in providing personalized counseling, timely monitoring, and clinical assessment for patients.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Aged , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Meningioma/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Nomograms , Public Health , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prognosis , SEER Program
12.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 7(1): e1944, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38009808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle is associated with meningioma risk in the general population. AIMS: We assessed longitudinal associations between lifestyle-associated factors and subsequent meningiomas in childhood cancer survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Childhood cancer survivors age ≥18 years in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study were evaluated for body composition, self-reported physical activity, cardiopulmonary fitness, muscle strength, smoking, and alcohol consumption at baseline. Time to first meningioma analyses were performed, adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis and baseline assessment, treatment decade, and childhood cancer treatment exposures. The study included 4,072 survivors (47% female; [mean (SD)] 9 (6) years at diagnosis; 30 (8.5) years at the start of follow-up, with 7.0 (3.3) years of follow-up). 30% of the participants were survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 29% of the participants had received cranial radiation. During follow-up, 90 participants developed ≥1 meningioma, of whom 73% were survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with cranial radiation being the strongest risk factor (relative risk [RR] 29.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.6-83.2). Muscle strength assessed by knee extension was associated with a lower risk of developing a meningioma in the adjusted analyses (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.04 for quartiles 3-4 vs. 1). No other lifestyle-associated variable was associated with subsequent meningioma. CONCLUSION: Independent of cranial radiation, muscle strength was associated with a lower risk of developing a subsequent meningioma in childhood cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Humans , Child , Female , Adolescent , Male , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/etiology , Meningioma/therapy , Cohort Studies , Life Style , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/etiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy
13.
Palliat Support Care ; 22(2): 338-346, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Meningiomas are the most common, primary intracranial tumor and most are benign. Little is known of the rare patient group living with a malignant meningioma, comprising 1-3% of all meningiomas. Our aim was to explore how patients perceived quality of daily life after a malignant meningioma diagnosis. METHODS: This qualitative explorative study was composed of individual semi-structured interviews. Eligible patients (n = 12) were selected based on ability to participate in an interview, from a background population of 23 patients diagnosed with malignant meningioma at Rigshospitalet from 2000 to 2021. We performed an inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's guidelines. RESULTS: Eight patients were interviewed. The analysis revealed 4 overarching themes: (1) perceived illness and cause of symptoms, (2) identity, roles, and interaction, (3) threat and uncertainty of the future, and (4) belief in authority. The perceived quality of daily life is negatively impacted by the disease. Patients experience a shift in self-concept and close interactions, and some struggle with accepting a new everyday life. Patients have a high risk of discordant prognostic awareness in relation to health-care professionals. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: We provide a much-needed patient-centered perspective of living with malignant meningioma: quality of life was affected by perception of threat and an uncertainty of the future. Perception of illness and the interpretation of the cause of symptoms varied between subjects, but a common trait was that patients' identity, roles, and interactions were affected. Shared decision-making and a strengthened continuity during follow-up could aid this rare patient group.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Meningioma/complications , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/pathology , Quality of Life , Prognosis , Qualitative Research , Meningeal Neoplasms/complications , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology
14.
Anticancer Res ; 43(12): 5499-5508, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Mediterranean diet may be deemed as the best combination of nutrients to play a protective role against cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated how a healthy lifestyle, and the adherence to the Mediterranean diet might affect the onset of most common cancers, focusing less on their relationship with central nervous system (CNS) tumoral pathologies, especially benign ones, such as meningiomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study, involving 52 patients who underwent meningioma resection and a group of 100 subjects not affected by brain tumors. This preliminary study aimed to investigate whether the non-adherence to a dietary pattern, such as the Mediterranean diet, and pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors can affect the onset of cranial meningiomas. RESULTS: Patients affected by meningioma had a significantly lower mean Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), and a similar distribution of the main cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: A larger patient cohort is required to corroborate our findings. However, these promising results open up a new avenue for further exploration of the role of the Mediterranean diet in the development of meningiomas.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diet, Mediterranean , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Meningioma/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
16.
J Neurooncol ; 165(2): 291-299, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938444

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018-2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008-2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018-2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Aged , Meningioma/diagnostic imaging , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Brain/pathology , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/therapy
17.
J Neurooncol ; 165(1): 29-39, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pachymeningeal disease (PMD) is a newly recognized pattern of brain metastasis (BrM) failure that specifically occurs following surgery with adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and has unique prognostic implications relative to leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Here, we report its prevalence, prognostic implications, and associated risk factors. METHODS: A literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on PUBMED and Cochrane from January 2000 to June 2023. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies that included a total of 3992 BrM patients, 659 (16.5%) of whom developed meningeal disease (MD) following surgery plus adjuvant SRS, including either PMD or LMD. The mean prevalence of MD across studies was 20.9% (7.9-38.0%), with PMD accounting for 54.6% of this prevalence and LMD comprising the remaining 45.4%. Mean of the median overall survivals following diagnosis of PMD and LMD was 10.6 months and 3.7 months p = 0.007, respectively, a significant difference. Only 2 risk factors for PMD were reported in ≥ 2 studies and also identified as statistically significant per our meta-analysis: infratentorial location and controlled systemic disease status. CONCLUSION: While PMD has a superior prognosis to LMD, it is nevertheless a critical oncologic event associated with significant mortality and remains poorly recognized. PMD is predominantly observed in patients with controlled systemic disease status and infratentorial location. Future treatment strategies should focus on reducing surgical seeding and sterilizing surgical cavities.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/therapy , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Acta Oncol ; 62(9): 994-1000, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. Previous research on the incidence of meningioma in Finland showed an increase in the age-standardized incidence rate over three decades (1968-1997). In this study, we analysed meningioma incidence in Finland during 1990-2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 9842 meningioma patients were obtained from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and population size by calendar year, sex, and age group from Statistics Finland. The European Standard Population was used to calculate age-standardized incidence rates. Poisson regression was used to evaluate differences by sex and age, and joinpoint regression to examine changes in trend. RESULTS: At the beginning of the study period, the age-standardized incidence of meningioma for men was 2.35/100,000 and for women 6.96/100,000. In the end, it was 4.09/100,000 and 10.19/100,000, respectively. The annual percent change (APC) for women was +4.6 (95% confidence interval, CI 3.10 to 6.20) from 1990 to 2001 and -1.0 (95% CI -1.70 to -0.30) from 2001 to 2017. For men, the APC was +3.1 (95% CI 0.80-5.40) during 1990-2002 and -0.9 (95% CI -2.10 to 0.30) in 2002-2017. The incidence of meningioma in women was 2.8 times higher than in men (rate ratio 2.81; 95% CI 2.68-2.94). CONCLUSIONS: Meningioma incidence increased in both sexes from 1990, but the trend reversed in 2001-2002. Medical imaging or risk factors do not appear to explain the changes.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Male , Humans , Female , Meningioma/epidemiology , Incidence , Finland/epidemiology , Routinely Collected Health Data , Registries , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology
19.
World Neurosurg ; 180: 123-133, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are one of the most common benign primary brain tumors; however, there is a paucity of literature on potential preventability. This comprehensive review aimed to explore the existing evidence for the potential risk factors that may contribute to meningioma development and to discuss early prevention strategies. METHODS: Literature search was conducted via MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database to retrieve existing literature on various environmental exposures and lifestyle behaviors that are potential risk factors for the development of meningiomas. RESULTS: Significant risk factors included exposure to ionizing radiation and certain environmental chemicals. Notably, this study also identified that cigarette smoking and obesity are associated with the development of meningiomas. To date, wireless phone usage, hormonal exposures, dietary factors, and traumatic brain injury remain inconclusive. Early prevention strategies should primarily be family-driven, community-based, and public health-endorsed strategies. Targeting unhealthy behaviors through healthcare organizations could execute a pivotal role in the maintenance of an optimum lifestyle, reducing the development of risk factors pertinent to meningiomas. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study that offers a perspective on prevention of meningiomas. A causal relationship of risk factors in developing meningiomas cannot be directly established with the current evidence. We are aware of the limitations of the hypothesis, but we believe that this study will raise more awareness and our findings could potentially be endorsed by organizations promoting health across the globe. Further prospective and retrospective studies will shed more light on this topic and help establish a definitive relationship.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Meningioma/etiology , Meningioma/prevention & control , Meningioma/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Brain Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/etiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/prevention & control
20.
Eur J Neurol ; 30(10): 3244-3255, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Meningiomas are the most common primary tumours of the central nervous system. This study aimed to provide comprehensive nationwide estimates on the incidence, prevalence and prognostic impact of meningioma diagnosis in the Netherlands. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with meningioma in 2000-2019 were selected from the Dutch Brain Tumour Registry (DBTR), part of the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Time trends in age-adjusted incidence and prevalence rates were evaluated using the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Relative survival rates were calculated using the Pohar Perme estimator. Case completeness of the DBTR/NCR was estimated through record linkage with one of the Dutch neuro-oncology centres. RESULTS: From a total of 23,454 cases of meningioma, 11,306 (48.2%) were histologically confirmed and 12,148 (51.8%) were radiological diagnoses. Over time, the incidence of diagnosis increased from 46.9 per 1,000,000 inhabitants (European Standardized Rate [ESR]) to 107.3 (EAPC 4.7%, p < 0.01), with an increase in the incidence of radiological diagnoses from 14.0 to 70.2 per 1,000,000 ESR (EAPC 9.1%, p < 0.01). The prevalence of meningioma was estimated at 1012/1,000,000 on 1 January 2020, with almost 17,800 individuals having had a diagnosis of meningioma. Relative survival rate at 10 years for grade 1 meningiomas was 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.4%-92.3%), 71.3% (95% CI 66.8%-75.2%) for grade 2 meningiomas and 36.4% (95% CI 27.3%-45.6%) for grade 3 meningiomas. Local case completeness was estimated at 97.6% for histologically confirmed meningiomas and 84.5% for radiological diagnoses. CONCLUSION: With a near-complete registry, meningioma prevalence was estimated at over 1000 per 1,000,000 inhabitants.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Adult , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/pathology , Central Nervous System , Incidence , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Transcription Factors , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Registries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...