Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 12.481
Filter
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 1-7, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721949

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients have highly stressful life events and exhibit psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional stress can cause or exacerbate urticaria symptoms by causing mast cell degranulation via neuromediators. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of stressful life events and compare psychiatric comorbidities and serum neuromediator levels in patients with CSU who responded to omalizumab with healthy controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 42 patients with CSU who received at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and a control group of 42 healthy controls. Stressful life events were evaluated with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety and stress levels. Serum nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. RESULTS: Twenty-six (62%) patients reported at least one stressful life event a median of 3.5 months before the onset of CSU. There were no significant differences in all three variables in the DASS subscales between the patient and control groups. Serum NGF levels were found to be significantly lower in patients with CSU (p <0.001), whereas CGRP levels were found to be significantly higher (p <0.001). There was no significant difference for SP. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological status of patients with CSU who benefited from omalizumab was similar to that of healthy controls. Omalizumab may affect stress-related neuromediator levels.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Nerve Growth Factor , Omalizumab , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Adult , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Stress, Psychological/blood , Nerve Growth Factor/blood , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Substance P/blood , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Comorbidity , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/blood , Depression/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/blood , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
2.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 47(2): 367-398, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724126

ABSTRACT

Administration of psychedelics for mental health treatment, typically referred to as "psychedelic-assisted therapy," is a broad term with a very heterogeneous implementation. Despite increasing interest in the clinical application of psychedelic compounds for psychiatric disorders, there is no consensus on how to best integrate the psychedelic experience with evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment. This systematic review provides a timely appraisal of existing approaches to combining psychotherapy with psychedelics and provides clear recommendations to best develop, optimize, and integrate evidence-based psychotherapy with psychedelic administration for straightforward scientific inference and maximal therapeutic benefit.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens , Mental Disorders , Psychotherapy , Humans , Hallucinogens/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy/methods , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine
3.
Indian J Med Ethics ; IX(2): 89-93, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755760

ABSTRACT

The relationship between the pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare profession, especially doctors, has always been fraught with conflicts of interest (COI). The publication of the influential The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), by the American Psychiatric Society (APA) raised concerns that the financial relationships between pharma and members responsible for DSM could result in bias. This resulted in calls for stricter enforcement of controls on financial conflict of interest (FCOI) [1, 2], which could influence the formulation of diagnostic criteria (resulting in more people being "diagnosable as mentally ill"), creating a larger pool of "patients" who "need" pharmaceutical drugs. Knowingly or unknowingly, they would end up serving the pharmaceutical companies' agenda to sell more drugs and drive up profits [2] .


Subject(s)
Conflict of Interest , Drug Industry , Humans , Drug Industry/ethics , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , India , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , United States
4.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders , Registries , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Prevalence , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Young Adult , Adolescent , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Sex Factors
5.
BMJ ; 385: q1095, 2024 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744471
6.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732599

ABSTRACT

In this study, a systematic review of randomized clinical trials conducted from January 2000 to December 2023 was performed to examine the efficacy of psychobiotics-probiotics beneficial to mental health via the gut-brain axis-in adults with psychiatric and cognitive disorders. Out of the 51 studies involving 3353 patients where half received psychobiotics, there was a notably high measurement of effectiveness specifically in the treatment of depression symptoms. Most participants were older and female, with treatments commonly utilizing strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria over periods ranging from 4 to 24 weeks. Although there was a general agreement on the effectiveness of psychobiotics, the variability in treatment approaches and clinical presentations limits the comparability and generalization of the findings. This underscores the need for more personalized treatment optimization and a deeper investigation into the mechanisms through which psychobiotics act. The research corroborates the therapeutic potential of psychobiotics and represents progress in the management of psychiatric and cognitive disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Probiotics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Female , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/therapy , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Male , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Brain-Gut Axis/drug effects , Middle Aged , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Lactobacillus , Aged , Bifidobacterium
8.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e078431, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724060

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the time course of medication adherence and some of the factors involved in this process in undocumented migrants with chronic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A big non-governmental organisation in Milano, Italy, giving medical assistance to undocumented migrants. PARTICIPANTS: 1918 patients, 998 females and 920 males, with at least one chronic condition (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), mental health disorders) seen over a period of 10 years (2011-2020). Their mean age was 49.2±13 years. RESULTS: Adherence to medications decreased over 1 year in all patients. This was more evident during the first 2 months of treatment. Patients on only one medication were less adherent than those on more than one medication; at 6 months the percentage of patients with high adherence was 33% vs 57% (p<0.0001) for diabetes, 15% vs 46% (p<0.0001) for mental disorders and 35% vs 59% (p<0.0001) for CVDs. Patients with mental disorders had the lowest adherence: 25% at 6 months and 3% at 1 year. Mental disorders, when present as comorbidities, greatly reduced the probability of being highly adherent: risk ratio (RR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; p=0.006) at 3 months, RR 0.77, (95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; p=0.06) at 6 months, RR 0.35 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.94; p=0.04) at 1 year. This was especially evident for patients with CVDs, whose percentage of high adherents decreased to 30% (p=0.0008) at 6 months and to 3% (p=0.01) at 1 year. We also noted that highly adherent patients usually were those most frequently seen by a doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to increase medication adherence of undocumented migrants with chronic diseases are necessary, particularly in the first 2 months after beginning treatment. These should be aimed at people-centred care and include more outpatient consultations. Educational interventions should especially be taken into consideration for patients on monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence , Mental Disorders , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Italy , Adult , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
9.
J Glob Health ; 14: 04074, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783701

ABSTRACT

Background: Compliance with guidelines regarding monitoring of metabolic adverse effects induced by antipsychotics has been consistently low. We characterised and evaluated the quality of institutional quality improvement (QI) interventions designed to address disparities between guidelines and real-world practices. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of these interventions on the screening and management of metabolic risks for inpatients receiving treatment with antipsychotic medications. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of institutional QI intervention studies aimed at improving antipsychotic-associated metabolic risk monitoring in hospitalised mental disease patients. Relevant studies were identified through searches conducted in the Embase and PubMed databases, as well as by reviewing previous reviews and meta-analyses. Quantitative analyses were performed, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the impact of QI programmes on guideline adherence in clinical practice. Results: We identified 12 intervention studies (n = 10 128 and n = 2667 patients in the pre-and post-intervention groups, respectively) and included them in our meta-analysis. QI interventions demonstrated effectiveness in bridging the guideline-practice gap in monitoring antipsychotic-induced metabolic adverse effects, as supported by the ORs and 95% CIs for post-intervention monitoring of plasma glucose, lipids, and blood pressure (BP) vs the pre-intervention period being OR = 6.90 (95% CI = 1.51-31.48), OR = 5.39 (95% CI = 4.01-7.24), and OR = 4.81 (95% CI = 1.23-18.79), respectively. Only 33.3% (4/12) of studies reported screening rates for all four metabolic parameters (plasma glucose, lipids, weight/body mass index (BMI), and BP). The median rates for metabolic screening of plasma glucose, lipids, and BP increased from 51.0-80.0%, 28.7-66.7%, and 91.7-95.8%, respectively. Up to 66.7% (8/12) of intervention studies lacked follow-up measures to treat or manage identified risks in hospitalised psychiatric patients, such as patient referrals, prescription of medications, and switching of antipsychotics. The odds of monitoring weight/BMI and glucose were greatest when QI programmes involved the participation of multidisciplinary health care professionals and patients, yielding OR = 3.35 (95% CI = 2.45-4.59) and OR = 57.51 (95% CI = 24.11-137.21), respectively. Conclusions: Institutional QI interventions were effective in enhancing monitoring practices in alignment with established guidelines for metabolic risk screening among hospitalised patients with mental disorders maintained on antipsychotic medications. Future institutional QI programmes should incorporate multidisciplinary strategies involving patient engagement and extend their focus beyond screening to incorporate follow-up risk management strategies once risks have been identified. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023452138.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Mental Disorders , Quality Improvement , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence
10.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241248130, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785261

ABSTRACT

Social care practitioners are often under-represented in research activity and output. Evidence-based practice enables social care practitioners to develop/engage the skills to evaluate evidence and be more actively involved in research. REalist Synthesis Of non-pharmacologicaL interVEntions for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (RESOLVE) is a NIHR-funded study where realist synthesis is used to understand and explain how, why, for whom, and in what contexts non-pharmacological interventions help service users, with severe mental illness, to manage antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Social care practitioners are a key part of the team providing care for people living with severe mental illness and therefore supporting antipsychotic-induced weight gain. The current study, RESOLVE 2, uses realist evaluation and RESOLVE as an illustrative example to help understand why and how social care practitioners engage (or not) with research. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews will be undertaken with a purposive sample of approximately 20 social care practitioners working with people who have severe mental illness, are treated with antipsychotics, and have experienced weight gain. Participants will be recruited from NHS Trusts and recruitment avenues such as social media and personal networks. Topics discussed during interviews will include barriers and facilitators to engagement in research, current, and past engagement as well as recommendations for researchers and other practitioners. Interview recordings will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using realist evaluation which will allow in-depth causal explanations for research engagement. Better understanding of research engagement by social care practitioners will allow for evidence-based practice and better patient outcomes within these settings.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Mental Disorders , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Health Services Research , Weight Gain , Interviews as Topic , Evidence-Based Practice , Social Work
11.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 166, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder that affects a significant number of individuals globally. This condition is associated with a high occurrence of psychiatric comorbidities, which can significantly affect the quality of life of individuals affected. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between antiseizure therapies and the likelihood of psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with epilepsy. METHODOLOGY: Data for this study was gathered from the Neurology referral center in Islamabad, Pakistan. A standardized questionnaire was utilized to gather data from 120 individuals diagnosed with epilepsy. The survey consisted of inquiries regarding the management of seizures, the utilization of anti-seizure medications, and the presence of psychiatric comorbidities. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: The findings indicated that individuals who were using multiple antiseizure medications had a notably higher likelihood of having psychiatric comorbidities in comparison to those who were on mono therapy (p = 0.010). suggests that patients with unsuccessful seizure control are more probable to have psychiatric comorbidities as compared to those with good seizure control (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: To conclude poor seizure control and poly therapy are associated with increased risk of psychiatric comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Epilepsy , Mental Disorders , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Comorbidity , Adolescent , Pakistan/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Comput Biol Med ; 175: 108536, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701592

ABSTRACT

In response to the shortcomings in data quality and coverage for neurological and psychiatric disorders (NPDs) in existing comprehensive databases, this paper introduces the DTNPD database, specifically designed for NPDs. DTNPD contains detailed information on 30 NPDs types, 1847 drugs, 514 drug targets, 64 drug combinations, and 61 potential target combinations, forming a network with 2389 drug-target associations. The database is user-friendly, offering open access and downloadable data, which is crucial for network pharmacology studies. The key strength of DTNPD lies in its robust networks of drug and target combinations, as well as drug-target networks, facilitating research and development in the field of NPDs. The development of the DTNPD database marks a significant milestone in understanding and treating NPDs. For accessing the DTNPD database, the primary URL is http://dtnpd.cnsdrug.com, complemented by a mirror site available at http://dtnpd.lyhbio.com.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/metabolism , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Databases, Pharmaceutical , Databases, Factual
13.
Nutrients ; 16(8)2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674921

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: L-carnitine (LC), a vital nutritional supplement, plays a crucial role in myocardial health and exhibits significant cardioprotective effects. LC, being the principal constituent of clinical-grade supplements, finds extensive application in the recovery and treatment of diverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders. However, controversies persist regarding the utilization of LC in nervous system diseases, with varying effects observed across numerous mental and neurological disorders. This article primarily aims to gather and analyze database information to comprehensively summarize the therapeutic potential of LC in patients suffering from nervous system diseases while providing valuable references for further research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web Of Science, Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. The literature pertaining to the impact of LC supplementation on neurological or psychiatric disorders in patients was reviewed up until November 2023. No language or temporal restrictions were imposed on the search. RESULTS: A total of 1479 articles were retrieved, and after the removal of duplicates through both automated and manual exclusion processes, 962 articles remained. Subsequently, a meticulous re-screening led to the identification of 60 relevant articles. Among these, there were 12 publications focusing on hepatic encephalopathy (HE), while neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) and peripheral nervous system diseases (PNSDs) were represented by 9 and 6 articles, respectively. Additionally, stroke was addressed in five publications, whereas Raynaud's syndrome (RS) and cognitive disorder (CD) each had three dedicated studies. Furthermore, migraine, depression, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) each accounted for two publications. Lastly, one article was found for other symptoms under investigation. CONCLUSION: In summary, LC has demonstrated favorable therapeutic effects in the management of HE, Alzheimer's disease (AD), carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), CD, migraine, neurofibromatosis (NF), PNSDs, RS, and stroke. However, its efficacy appears to be relatively limited in conditions such as ALS, ataxia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), Down syndrome (DS), and sciatica.


Subject(s)
Carnitine , Mental Disorders , Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Carnitine/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 336: 115917, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663222

ABSTRACT

The relationship between the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and suicide risk in patients with mental disorders remains controversial. We conducted a network meta-analysis to examine the effects of SSRIs on suicide risk in patients with mental disorders. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for articles published until December 19, 2023. The main outcomes were suicidal ideation and instances of suicidal behavior. We included 29 double-blind randomized trials in our analysis. The findings suggest that SSRIs primarily offer short-term protection against suicidal ideation. By week 2, paroxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram, and non-SSRI treatments were linked to a decreased suicide risk compared with a placebo, with the exception of sertraline. This protective effect was diminished by week 8. In contrast, studies on instances of suicidal behavior from weeks 1 to 10 found no significant difference in efficacy between SSRIs, non-SSRIs, and placebo. These results indicate that SSRIs may offer short-term protection against suicidal ideation. However, their long-term effectiveness in mitigating suicidal ideation and preventing suicidal behaviors is limited.


Subject(s)
Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Suicidal Ideation , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Double-Blind Method , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/psychology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy
15.
Toxins (Basel) ; 16(4)2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668616

ABSTRACT

Botulinum toxin type A (BONT-A) has shown promise in improving the mood-related symptoms of psychiatric disorders by targeting muscles linked to the expression of negative emotions. We conducted a systematic review of past and ongoing efficacy trials of BONT-A therapy for psychiatric disorders to identify relevant trends in the field and discuss the refinement of therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search for published clinical trials using BONT-A injections for psychiatric disorders was performed on 4 May 2023 through OVID databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO). Unpublished clinical trials were searched through the ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform public registries. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tools for use in systematic reviews. We identified 21 studies (17 published, 4 unpublished clinical trials) involving 471 patients. The studies focused on evaluating the efficacy of BONT-A for major depressive, borderline personality, social anxiety, and bipolar disorders. BONT-A was most commonly injected into the glabellar area, with an average dose ranging between 37.75 U and 44.5 U in published studies and between 32.7 U and 41.3 U in unpublished trials. The results indicated significant symptom reductions across all the studied psychiatric conditions, with mild adverse effects. Thus, BONT-A appears to be safe and well-tolerated for psychiatric disorders of negative affectivity. However, despite the clinical focus, there was a noted shortage of biomarker-related assessments. Future studies should focus on pursuing mechanistic explorations of BONT-A effects at the neurobiological level.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Clinical Trials as Topic , Mental Disorders , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
17.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 241(6): 1101-1110, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683460

ABSTRACT

Recent years have seen a resurgence in randomized, placebo controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing non-classical psychedelics (e.g. 3,4-methyl enedioxy methamphetamine [MDMA]), and classical psychedelics (e.g. psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], and N,N-dimethyltryptamine [DMT/ayahuasca]) in conjunction with assisted therapy (AT) for psychiatric disorders. A notable methodological challenge in psychedelic AT, however, is the complexity of blinding procedures. The lack of efficacious blinding can introduce considerable response bias, reduce internal validity, and compromise participant retention. This systematic review examines design and blinding techniques in RCTs utilizing psychedelics and placebo for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The aim of this work is to identify factors that may inform future RTC design for conducting psychedelics research. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Psycinfo, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection to examine: (1) placebo selection, (2) study design, and (3) integrity of blinding measures. Sixteen publications were identified as meeting the criteria for a systematic review. Our findings suggest that traditional placebo administration is insufficient to control for expectancy confounds. Consequently, experimental methodology that limits personnel unblinding and the use of an active placebo are important considerations when designing prospective clinical studies involving psychedelics.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Hallucinogens/administration & dosage , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Research Design , Double-Blind Method
18.
Psychiatry Res ; 335: 115886, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574699

ABSTRACT

We aim to systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness and safety of psychedelics [psilocybin, ayahuasca (active component DMT), LSD and MDMA] in treating symptoms of various mental disorders. Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and PubMed were searched up to February 2024 and 126 articles were finally included. Results showed that psilocybin has the largest number of articles on treating mood disorders (N = 28), followed by ayahuasca (N = 7) and LSD (N = 6). Overall, psychedelics have therapeutic effects on mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Specifically, psilocybin (Hedges' g = -1.49, 95% CI [-1.67, -1.30]) showed the strongest therapeutic effect among four psychedelics, followed by ayahuasca (Hedges' g = -1.34, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.82]), MDMA (Hedges' g = -0.83, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.32]), and LSD (Hedges' g = -0.65, 95% CI [-1.03, -0.27]). A small amount of evidence also supports psychedelics improving tobacco addiction, eating disorders, sleep disorders, borderline personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder. The most common adverse event with psychedelics was headache. Nearly a third of the articles reported that no participants reported lasting adverse effects. Our analyses suggest that psychedelics reduce negative mood, and have potential efficacy in other mental disorders, such as substance-use disorders and PTSD.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens , Mental Disorders , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Hallucinogens/adverse effects , Psilocybin/adverse effects , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/therapeutic use , Lysergic Acid Diethylamide/adverse effects , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/chemically induced , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247965, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652474

ABSTRACT

Importance: Numerous studies have provided evidence for the negative associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with mental health, but data on the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking. Objective: To assess the rates and trends of psychotropic medication prescribing before and over the 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents in France. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide interrupted time-series analysis of outpatient drug dispensing data from the IQVIA X-ponent database. All 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed to children (6 to 11 years of age) and adolescents (12 to 17 years of age) between January 2016 and May 2022 in France were retrieved and analyzed. Exposure: Onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions per 1000 children and adolescents were analyzed using a quasi-Poisson regression before and after the pandemic onset (March 2020), and percentage changes in rates and trends were assessed. After the pandemic onset, rate ratios (RRs) were calculated between estimated and expected monthly prescription rates. Analyses were stratified by psychotropic medication class (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative, antidepressant, and psychostimulant) and age group (children, adolescents). Results: In total, 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions were analyzed, 5 884 819 [66.6%] for adolescents and 2 954 324 [33.4%] for children. In January 2016, the estimated rate of monthly psychotropic medication prescriptions was 9.9 per 1000 children and adolescents, with the prepandemic rate increasing by 0.4% per month (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%). In March 2020, the monthly prescription rate dropped by 11.5% (95% CI, -17.7% to -4.9%). During the 2 years following the pandemic onset, the trend changed significantly, and the prescription rate increased by 1.3% per month (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%), reaching 16.1 per 1000 children and adolescents in May 2022. Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions exceeded the expected rates by 11% (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.14]). Increases in prescribing trends were observed for all psychotropic medication classes after the pandemic onset but were substantial for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants. Prescription rates rose above those expected for all psychotropic medication classes except psychostimulants (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15] in adolescents and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] in children for antipsychotics; RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35] in adolescents and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] in children for anxiolytics; RR, 2.50 [95% CI, 2.23-2.77] in adolescents and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.50] in children for hypnotics and sedatives; RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47] in adolescents and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25] in children for antidepressants; and RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98] in adolescents and 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] in children for psychostimulants). Changes were more pronounced among adolescents than children. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prescribing of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents in France significantly and persistently increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Future research should identify underlying determinants to improve psychological trajectories in young people.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Psychotropic Drugs , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Child , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
20.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 66(3): 125-129, 2024.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an evidence-based model that involves the collaborative development of a treatment plan. SDM in adolescents with mental health problems is complex. Most mental health problems arise in adolescence and psychotropic drugs are an important part of treatment. Previous research focuses primarily on caregivers’ experience with SDM. AIM: This research has the main objective to gain insight into the adolescents’ experience with shared decision making related to psychotropic drugs. METHODS: Qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with 12 adolescents (12-18 years old) between June and October 2021, followed by thematic analysis of the data using the systematic text condensation (Malterud). RESULTS: Four themes were identified in the analysis: 1) the adolescent wants to feel heard, 2) the adolescent needs support in forming and expressing his/her opinion, 3) SDM in adolescents is a complex trialogue, and 4) the decision-making process affects treatment and adherence. CONCLUSION: When we ask adolescents about their experience with SDM, we can learn the following:- Involve parents, but always tailor this to the individual adolescent and his context. – Put the adolescent at the center. – Dwell on the adolescent’s view on psychotropic drugs.


Subject(s)
Decision Making, Shared , Psychotropic Drugs , Qualitative Research , Humans , Adolescent , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Child , Decision Making , Mental Disorders/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...