Cost-effectiveness and quality of life associated with heavy menstrual bleeding among women using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature for economic and health-related quality of life outcomes data associated with the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases simultaneously using the Ovid interface to review the literature in a systematic manner for economic and health-related quality of life outcomes data associated with the use of the LNG-IUS in women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Articles were then selected for further review based on the relevance of their titles and/or abstracts. We identified 17 articles for inclusion in this review. RESULTS: Treating heavy menstrual bleeding with the LNG-IUS was found to be cost-effective in various countries and settings. Moreover, irrespective of the measuring instrument used, health-related quality-of-life outcomes were found to be improved to a degree similar to that achieved with endometrial ablation or hysterectomy. In some cases, the LNG-IUS appeared to be more effective and less costly than the surgical options. CONCLUSION: The LNG-IUS is a cost-effective treatment option for heavy menstrual bleeding when pharmacologic treatment is indicated.

The effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the Hydro ThermAblator (HTA) for abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the overall effectiveness and risk factors for failure of hydrothermal ablation in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent hydrothermal ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding at our institution from July 2005 through February 2008. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, insurance status, body mass index, bleeding pattern, obstetric history, prior medical therapy and duration, uterine characteristics, and tobacco use history. RESULTS: In all, 159 patients were identified and 142 charts were eligible for evaluation. A total of 45 patients (31.6%) had return of preablation vaginal bleeding. Menometrorrhagia was a significant predictor for failure (P = .027) and subsequent hysterectomy (P = .0025). Younger age (P = .044), tobacco use (P = .042), and Medicaid/Medicare insurance status (P = .039) were also associated with a higher risk of failure. CONCLUSION: Women who are younger, use tobacco products, and have menometrorrhagia are more likely to fail hydrothermal ablation.

Financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment.

PURPOSE: In this study, we sought to 1) describe elements of the financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) from the perspective of women who agreed to obtain surgical treatment; 2) explore associations between DUB symptom characteristics and the financial and quality-of-life burden; 3) estimate the annual dollar value of the financial burden; and 4) estimate the most that could be spent on surgery to eliminate DUB symptoms for which medical treatment has been unsuccessful that would result in a $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. METHODS: We collected baseline data on DUB symptoms and aspects of the financial and quality-of-life burden for 237 women agreeing to surgery for DUB in a randomized trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation. Measures included out-of-pocket pharmaceutical expenditures, excess expenditures on pads or tampons, the value of time missed from paid work and home management activities, and health utility. We used chi2 and t tests to assess the statistical significance of associations between DUB characteristics and the financial and quality-of-life burden. The annual financial burden was estimated. RESULTS: Pelvic pain and cramps were associated with activity limitations and tiredness was associated with a lower health utility. Excess pharmaceutical and pad and tampon costs were $333 per patient per year (95% confidence interval [CI], $263-$403). Excess paid work and home management loss costs were $2,291 per patient per year (95% CI, $1847-$2752). Effective surgical treatment costing $40,000 would be cost-effective compared with unsuccessful medical treatment. CONCLUSION: The financial and quality-of-life effects of DUB represent a substantial burden.

A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) impacts women's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and puts a heavy economic burden on society. To date, this burden has not been systematically studied. We conducted a systematic review of the medical literature to evaluate the impact of AUB on HRQoL and to quantify the economic burden of AUB from a societal perspective. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases, and article bibliographies for the period up to July 2005. Teams of two reviewers independently abstracted data from studies that reported outcomes of interest: prevalence, HRQoL, work impairment, and health-care utilization and costs associated with AUB. RESULTS: The search yielded 1009 English-language articles. Ninety-eight studies (including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and reviews) that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent a full-text review. The prevalence of AUB among women of reproductive age ranged from 10% to 30%. The HRQoL scores from the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) suggested that women with AUB have HRQoL below the 25th percentile of that for the general female population within a similar age range. The conservatively estimated annual direct and indirect economic costs of AUB were approximately $1 billion and $12 billion, respectively. These figures do not account for intangible costs and productivity loss due to presenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of AUB needs further and more thorough investigation. Additional research should prospectively evaluate the impact of AUB and the value of treatment provided to help guide future health resource allocation and clinical decision-making.

Cost-effectiveness of treatments for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of treatments for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). STUDY DESIGN: The decision analytic model used a third-party payer perspective and 18-month horizon to compare treatment of DUB patients > or = 40 years old with no desire for fertility. Treatments were oral contraceptives (OCs) vs. surgery (first-/second-generation ablation or hysterectomy) after 3-9 months of OCs. Costs were based on publications and expert opinion. Efficacy measures were based on months with pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score < 100 and number of months of amenorrhea. RESULTS: Treatment costs were estimated at 513 dollars per patient per year (OCs), 3,500 dollars (first-generation ablation), 3,000 dollars (second-generation ablation) and 7,500 dollars (hysterectomy). Adverse event costs ranged from 12 dollars per year or episode (OCs, second-generation ablation) to 164 dollars per episode (hysterectomy). To achieve PBAC < 100, second-generation ablation after 3 months of OCs was the most cost-effective (7.6 additional DUB-free months vs. OCs, 215 dollars per additional month). Second-generation ablation was less costly and more effective than first-generation ablation. Early treatment with hysterectomy was more effective than ablation, but at substantial cost. When using the end point of amenorrhea, hysterectomy was most cost-effective. Results were not sensitive to variations in costs, effectiveness or length of OC use. CONCLUSION: A short OC trial followed by second-generation ablation is the most cost-effective strategy for women with DUB, although hysterectomy is more cost-effective to achieve amenorrhea. Hysterectomy cost-effectiveness might improve if evaluated over more time. Cost-effectiveness and patient preference must all play a role in treatment decisions.