Multiple Effects of Intravitreal Aflibercept on Microvascular Regression in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) on the number of microaneurysms and sizes of nonperfused areas (NPAs) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Interventional, prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five eyes of 25 DME patients (average age, 64.0±8.8 years) were treated with 3 consecutive monthly IVA injections. METHODS: Fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT were performed before the IVA injections (baseline) and at 1 week after the IVA treatment. The number of microaneurysms and the ischemic index (ISI), a measure of NPA, were determined. The correlations between central retinal thickness (CRT) and number of microaneurysms and the ISI were also determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean number of microaneurysms and NPA evaluated as the ISI. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean CRT was 485.7±90.6 µm. After treatment, the mean CRT was reduced significantly to 376.9±81.6 µm (P = 0.1 × 10-5, repeated analysis of variance). The mean number of microaneurysms was decreased significantly from 49.6±33.2 at baseline to 24.8±18.1 at 3 months after the initial treatment. This was a 50.4±21.2% reduction (P = 0.3 × 10-5, paired t test). The mean ISI was also decreased significantly from 55.5±20.4% at baseline to 28.8±16.8% after treatment (P = 0.3 × 10-5, paired t test). This was a reduction of 43.3±28.5%. A significant correlation was found between the CRT and number of microaneurysms at both baseline (r = 0.56; P = 0.004) and after treatment (r = 0.53; P = 0.006). A significant correlation was found between CRT and ISI at baseline (r = -0.39; P = 0.03) but not after treatment (r = -0.06; P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the number of microaneurysms was correlated with reduction in CRT.

Life Style Intervention Improves Retinopathy Status-The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.

The aim of the study was to find out whether participation in earlier intervention had an effect on the occurrence of retinopathy in study participants. We also examined risk factors (age, sex, weight, fasting and 2 h glucose, fasting insulin, blood pressure, serum lipids) for early retinal changes. The study included 522 individuals (mean 55 years old, range 40-64 years) with impaired glucose tolerance who were randomized into intervention (weight loss, healthy diet, and physical activity, N = 265) and control groups (N = 257). Intervention lasted for median of four years in 1993-2000, after which annual follow-up visits at study clinics were conducted. In the years 2002-2006 (at least five years after stopping intervention), fundus photography was offered for all study participants in four of five study clinics. Photographs were assessed by two experienced ophthalmologists (A.A. and K.K.), masked for the group assignment. After exclusion of poor quality photographs, the data of 211 individuals (N = 113 for intervention and N = 98 for control group) were included in the present study. The occurrence of microaneurysms was significantly higher in the control (37/98, 38%) than in the intervention group (27/113, 24%; p = 0.029). In the model, including age, sex, diabetes diagnosis before the retinal assessment, body mass index (BMI), and treatment group, the odds ratio for microaneurysms was markedly lower in intervention group (OR 0.52; 0.28-0.97, p = 0.039). The only risk factor that predicted the occurrence of microaneurysms was serum triglycerides at baseline (mean ± SD 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, mmol/L, with and without microaneurysms, respectively, p = 0.003). Triglycerides associated with decreased microaneurysms in regression analysis for age, sex, fasting glucose, and intervention group (OR 1.92, p = 0.018). Lifestyle intervention in overweight and obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance showed decreased occurrence of retinal microaneurysms. Elevated serum triglycerides were associated to the development of early diabetic microangiopathy.

Single herbal medicine for diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is one of the major causes of blindness and the number of cases has risen in recent years. Herbal medicine has been used to treat diabetes and its complications including diabetic retinopathy for thousands of years around the world. However, common practice is not always evidence-based. Evidence is needed to help people with diabetic retinopathy or doctors to make judicious judgements about using herbal medicine as treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and harm of single herbal medicine for diabetic retinopathy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, OpenGrey, the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ICTRP. The date of the search was 12 June 2018. We also searched the following Chinese databases in June 2013: Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Traditional Chinese Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System (TCMLARS), Wanfang China Dissertation Database (CDDB), Wanfang China Conference Paper Database (CCPD) and the Index to Chinese Periodical Literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that investigated the effects of any single herb (or extracts from a single herb) as a treatment for people with diabetic retinopathy. We considered the following comparators: placebo, no treatment, non-herbal (conventional) medicine or surgical treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. Our prespecified outcomes were: progression of diabetic retinopathy, visual acuity, microaneurysms and haemorrhages in the retina, blood glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) and adverse effects. We performed meta-analyses using risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies involving 754 participants, of which nine were conducted in China and one in Poland. In all studies, participants in both groups received conventional treatment for diabetic retinopathy which included maintaining blood glucose and lipids using medicines and keeping a stable diabetic diet. In three studies, the comparator group also received an additional potentially active comparator in the form of a vasoprotective drug. The single herbs or extracts included Ruscus extract tablet, Sanqi Tongshu capsule, tetramethylpyrazine injection, Xueshuantong injection, Puerarin injection and Xuesaitong injection. The Sanqi Tongshu capsule, Xueshuantong injection and Xuesaitong injection were all made from the extract of Radix Notoginseng (San qi) and the main ingredient was sanchinoside. The risk of bias was high in all included studies mainly due to lack of masking (blinding). None of the studies reported the primary outcome of this review, progression of retinopathy.Combined analysis of herbal interventions suggested that people who took these herbs in combination with conventional treatment may have been more likely to gain 2 or more lines of visual acuity compared to people who did not take these herbs when compared to conventional intervention alone at the end of treatment (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.48; 5 trials, 541 participants; low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses based on the different single herbs found no evidence for different effects of different herbs, but the power of this analysis was low. One study reported Sanqi Tongshu capsule might be associated with a greater reduction in microaneurysms and haemorrhages in the retina (very low-certainty evidence). The pooled analysis of two studies on tetramethylpyrazine or Xueshuantong injection showed such herbs may have had little effect on lowering HbA1c (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.58; 215 participants; low-certainty evidence).There was very low-certainty evidence on adverse events. Two studies reported minor adverse events such as uncomfortable stomach, urticaria, dizziness and headache. There was no report of observation on adverse events in the other studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No conclusions could be drawn about the effect of any single herb or herbal extract on diabetic retinopathy from the current available evidence. It was difficult to exclude the placebo effect as a possible explanation for observed differences due to the lack of placebo control in the included studies. Further adequately designed trials are needed to establish the evidence.