Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Planta ; 260(1): 29, 2024 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879859

ABSTRACT

MAIN CONCLUSION: The review discusses growth and drought-response mechanisms in minor millets under three themes: drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance. Drought is one of the most prominent abiotic stresses impacting plant growth, performance, and productivity. In the context of climate change, the prevalence and severity of drought is expected to increase in many agricultural regions worldwide. Millets (coarse grains) are a group of small-seeded grasses cultivated in arid and semi-arid regions throughout the world and are an important source of food and feed for humans and livestock. Although minor millets, i.e., foxtail millet, finger millet, proso millet, barnyard millet, kodo millet and little millet are generally hardier and more drought-resistant than cereals and major millets (sorghum and pearl millet), understanding their responses, processes and strategies in response to drought is more limited. Here, we review drought resistance strategies in minor millets under three themes: drought escape (e.g., short crop cycle, short vegetative period, developmental plasticity and remobilization of assimilates), drought avoidance (e.g., root traits for better water absorption and leaf traits to control water loss), and drought tolerance (e.g., osmotic adjustment, maintenance of photosynthetic ability and antioxidant potential). Data from 'omics' studies are summarized to provide an overview of the molecular mechanisms important in drought tolerance. In addition, the final section highlights knowledge gaps and challenges to improving minor millets. This review is intended to enhance major cereals and millet per se in light of climate-related increases in aridity.


Subject(s)
Droughts , Millets/physiology , Stress, Physiological , Photosynthesis/physiology , Climate Change , Water/metabolism , Water/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological , Crops, Agricultural/physiology , Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Drought Resistance
2.
Plant Signal Behav ; 15(8): 1774212, 2020 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552556

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine whether humic acid (HA) can alleviate the injury of millet caused by drought and its potential mechanism. Millet seeds (Jingu 21 and Zhangza 10) were soaked in different concentrations of HA (0, 50, 10, 200, and 300 mg L-1) for 12 h. The physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of millet seedlings, including growth parameters, osmotic regulators, antioxidase activity, photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and P700 parameters, were determined before and after drought stress. HA significantly promoted the growth of millet seedlings under drought stress. Pretreatment with 100 mg L-1 or 200 mg L-1 HA significantly increased free proline, soluble protein, and activity of the antioxidant enzyme system (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase) in both Zhangza 10 and Jingu 21. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species ([Formula: see text] and H2O2) was reduced in HA treatments compared with that of the control (P < .05). Moreover, HA (100 mg L-1) significantly increased net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, effective quantum yield of photosystem II, relative photosynthetic electron transfer rate of photosystem II, and photochemical quenching. HA also reduced intercellular CO2 concentration and non-photochemical quenching. Furthermore, 200 mg L-1 HA significantly increased the maximum P700, effective quantum yield of photosystem I, and relative photosynthetic electron transfer rate of photosystem I in Zhangza 10 and decreased non-photochemical energy dissipation in Jingu 21 and Zhangza 10 under drought stress. HA promoted the growth of millet seedlings under drought stress by promoting the osmotic adjustment ability and antioxidant capacity of seedlings and increased photosynthesis.


Subject(s)
Droughts , Humic Substances , Millets/metabolism , Millets/physiology , Photosynthesis/physiology , Seedlings/metabolism , Seedlings/physiology , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism
3.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0228993, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32053664

ABSTRACT

Bioirrigation has been defined as the transfer of hydraulically lifted water by a deep-rooted plant to a neighbouring shallow-rooted plant which cannot access deep soil moisture. In this study, we tested if facilitative effects of bioirrigation or the competition for water dominate the interaction of two intercropped plants-deep-rooted pigeon pea (PP) and shallow-rooted finger millet (FM) before and during a drought. Additionally, we tested how the presence of a common mycorrhizal network (CMN) affects the balance between facilitative (i.e. bioirrigation) and competitive interactions between two intercropping species. Our results show that PP can indeed promote the water relations of FM during a drought event. Specifically, stomatal conductance in FM controls dropped to low values of 27.1 to 33.6 mmol m-2s-1, while FM in intercropping treatments were able to maintain its stomatal conductance at 60 mmol m-2s-1. In addition, the presence of PP reduced the drought-induced foliar damage and mortality of FM. The observed facilitative effects of PP on FM were partially enhanced by the presence of a CMN. In contrast to the facilitative effects under drought, PP exerted strong competitive effects on FM before the onset of drought. This hindered growth and biomass production of FM when intercropped with PP, an effect that was even enhanced in the presence of a CMN. The results from our study thus indicate that in intercropping, deep-rooted plants may act as "bioirrigators" for shallow-rooted crops and that a CMN can promote these facilitative effects. However, the interspecific competition between the intercropped plants under conditions of abundant moisture supply can be strong and are enhanced by the presence of a CMN. In more general terms, our study shows that the extent by which the antagonistic effects of facilitation and competition are expressed in an intercropping system strongly depends on the availability of resources, which in the case of the present study was water and the presence of biotic interactions (i.e. the presence of a CMN).


Subject(s)
Droughts , Millets/physiology , Pisum sativum/metabolism , Pisum sativum/physiology , Plant Roots/metabolism , Plant Roots/physiology , Water/metabolism , Biomass , Millets/metabolism
4.
Planta ; 250(5): 1433-1448, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31300887

ABSTRACT

MAIN CONCLUSION: Phosphate starvation altered the root morphology and phosphate uptake with the induction of PHT1 family transporter genes in root and shoot tissues of seven millets. Millets are nutrient-rich cereals majorly cultivated in Asia and Africa. Foxtail millet (FoxM), pearl millet (PeaM), finger millet (FinM), kodo millet (KodM), little millet (LitM), proso millet (ProM), and barnyard millet (BarM) were examined for the influence of external phosphorous (P) supply on phenotypic traits, P uptake, yield, and PHosphate Transporter1 (PHT1) family gene expression. Millet seedlings grown under low Pi condition (LPC) produced significantly lower mean values for all traits except for lateral root length (LRL) and lateral root number (LRN) which were increased under LPC. Under LPC, seed weight (SW) also reduced by > 75% and had significantly lower levels of total P (TP) and Pi contents in leaf and root tissues. Expression dynamics of 12 PHT1 family (PHT1;1-1;12) transporters genes were analyzed in 7 millets. PHT1;2 has been found to be a constitutive transporter gene in all millets. Under LPC, root tissues showed the overexpression of PHT1;2, 1;3, 1;4 and 1;9 in FoxM, PHT1;1, 1;2, 1;3, 1;4, 1;8 and 1;10 in PeaM, PHT1;2 and 1;3 in FinM and ProM and PHT1;3, 1;6 and 1;11 in BarM. In leaf, LPC induced the expression of PHT1;3, 1;4 and 1;6 in FoxM, PHT1;2, 1;3, 1;4 and 1;8 in PeaM, PHT1;2, 1;3 and 1;4 in FinM and KodM, PHT1;2 in LitM and PHT1;4 in ProM and BarnM. This comprehensive study on the influence of P in phenotype, physiology, and molecular responses may help to improve the P uptake and its use efficiency of millets in future.


Subject(s)
Millets/physiology , Phosphate Transport Proteins/metabolism , Phosphates/metabolism , Biological Transport , Edible Grain , Millets/genetics , Millets/growth & development , Phenotype , Phosphate Transport Proteins/genetics , Phosphates/deficiency , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Plant Roots/genetics , Plant Roots/growth & development , Plant Roots/physiology , Plant Shoots/genetics , Plant Shoots/growth & development , Plant Shoots/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...