Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.055
Filter
5.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(6): 672-676, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840349

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the preventive efficacy of antibiotics following surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molars and screen the potential risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Stomatology Hospital, Hangzhou, China, from August 2021 to 2022. METHODOLOGY: Cases with impacted mandibular third molar were divided into two groups based on antibiotics use. The primary outcome variable post-operative infection, secondary clinical parameter analgesics intake, and other variables (the operative time, the history of pericoronitis, and wound closure) were documented. RESULTS: The post-operative infections occurred in 3.64% (n = 12) of the 330 cases (n = 330); 3.01% in the antibiotic group (n = 166) and 4.27% in the control group (n = 164, OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.49 to 4.06; p = 0.54). Concerning secondary outcome measures, the analgesics that the antibiotic group took was 5.40, and the control group took was 5.95 (95% CI = -0.21 to 1.30; p = 0.16). For those with post-operative infections, the average operative time was 22.83 minutes, whereas for those without post-operative infections it was 14.87 minutes (95% CI = -0.26 to 15.67; p = 0.04). When the operative time was greater than or equal to 15 minutes, it was related to more analgesics use (95% CI: -0.43 to 1.93; p <0.05), also was the history of pericoronitis (95% CI = 0.04 to 1.54; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics are unnecessary for preventing post-operative infections or minimising analgesic requirements following extraction of the impacted mandibular third molars; operative time and pericoronitis showed a suppressive influence on post-operative recovery. KEY WORDS: Impacted molars, Antibiotics, Analgesics, Operative time, Pericoronitis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Molar, Third , Surgical Wound Infection , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Male , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Female , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Adult , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Mandible/surgery , Young Adult , China/epidemiology , Operative Time , Cohort Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(6): 723-726, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840359

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar extraction and the associated factors. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from July to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 patients with third molar surgery were included. Patients were followed up after one week, one month, and three months of duration. The frequency of inferior alveolar nerve injury was determined as well as its relationship with other surgical variables like age, gender, type of impaction, buccal flap retraction, bone cutting, tooth splitting, and duration of surgery via Chi-square test. RESULTS: The frequency of inferior alveolar nerve injury was found to be 1.2% (n = 02). None of the surgical variables had a statistically significant association with it (p >0.05). CONCLUSION: The frequency of nerve injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during extraction of the third molar was 1.2%. Proper treatment planning, using advanced radiography, experienced surgeon, and proper technique can help in lowering nerve injury risk. KEY WORDS: Inferior alveolar nerve injuries, Molar, Tooth extraction, Paraesthesia.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Nerve Injuries , Molar, Third , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Female , Male , Adult , Pakistan/epidemiology , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Mandibular Nerve Injuries/epidemiology , Mandibular Nerve Injuries/etiology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Mandibular Nerve
8.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302581, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696507

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We will perform the systematic review to evaluate the effect of applying concentrated growth factor (CGF) on relieving postoperative complications and promoting wound healing following mandibular third molar extraction. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), and VIP Databases will be comprehensively searched up to May 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the application of CGF after mandibular third molar extraction will be included. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, and the registration ID was CRD42023463234. Two reviewers will conduct the literature search, eligible study selection, data extraction, and bias risk assessment (using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool). Data analysis will be performed with RevMan software (version 5.4). RESULTS: The results of this study will be available in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: Our study will provide scientific evidence regarding the efficacy of applying CGF in mandibular third molar extraction.


Subject(s)
Meta-Analysis as Topic , Molar, Third , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction/methods , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/administration & dosage , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/pharmacology , Mandible/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Wound Healing/drug effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
9.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 304, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration in preemptive analgesia and anxiety control in lower third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial conducted with patients divided into two groups: control group, receiving placebo and dexamethasone, and test group, receiving pregabalin and dexamethasone preoperatively. The evaluated variables were pain, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), anxiety assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaires, hemodynamic parameters [Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)], and sedation assessed by the Ramsay scale. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included. The test group exhibited a significant reduction in pain at 2,4,6,8,12,16,24, and 48 h after surgery and in the consumption of rescue analgesics. Anxiety, evaluated by STAI and VAS, showed a significant decrease in the test group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in BP at most of the assessed time points (p < 0.05) and a significant reduction in HR at two different time intervals (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), indicating a positive effect in the test group. There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the groups. Sedation assessment revealed a significant difference at all time points favoring the test group (p < 0.05). There were no significant postoperative adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin coadministered with dexamethasone demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling postoperative pain and anxiety, as well as a sedative effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The coadministration of pregabalin with dexamethasone may presents potential advantages in both pain modulation and psychological well-being of individuals undergoing third molar surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC), No. RBR-378h6t6.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Dexamethasone , Drug Therapy, Combination , Molar, Third , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative , Pregabalin , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Male , Female , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Adult , Dental Anxiety/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pain Management/methods
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1219-1224, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sterile saline solution irrigation (lavage) performed after mandibular third molar extraction on postoperative complications, utilizing a split-mouth randomized clinical trial design. METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants requiring bilateral mandibular third molar extraction were enrolled in this single-center study. In each participant, one impacted third molar was designated as the experimental group and subjected to saline lavage at 4 °C. In contrast, the control group was the other impacted third molar, undergoing saline lavage at 25 °C. Various parameters, including postoperative pain, mouth opening, and facial swelling, were assessed using standardized measures and three-dimensional facial scanning at multiple time points. RESULTS: The average age of participants was 26.66 ± 4.1 years, with no postoperative complications observed in either group. The duration of surgery did not significantly differ between groups. Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in the experimental group during the immediate postoperative period compared with the control group, but this difference diminished over time. No significant differences were observed in mouth opening or facial swelling between groups at any time. CONCLUSION: In site 4 °C, sterile saline solution irrigation after mandibular third molar extraction may effectively reduce early postoperative complications, particularly pain, without prolonging surgical duration.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Saline Solution , Therapeutic Irrigation , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Adult , Male , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Female , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Pain Measurement
11.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 24(2): 101983, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The extraction of third molars is one of the most performed surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pain, oedema, and trismus are the most frequently complications related in the surgical postoperative period. The literature has indicated PBM as a potential adjuvant method to reduce these complications. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is evaluate the PBM, as an optimal method to improve patient experience and minimize postoperative morbidity. Additionally, we seek to determine which wavelength, site, and frequency of application are most effective. METHODS: This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429966) and followed PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in the main databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Lilacs, including reviews in the most important journals in the area of oral surgery and laser applied to oral surgery. In addition, all article references and also gray literature were reviewed. After the studies selection, the relevant data was collected. All the studies were randomized controlled trials and the patients were allocated into two groups: active PBM and inactive PBM. The statistical analysis was carried out using Stata v.16, and the methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Jadad scale and RoB 2.0, respectively. RESULTS: Where included 22 studies and 989 subjects, to all with a minimum follow-up of 7 days. Pain and oedema showed statistically significant results in favor to the active PBM group. Especially when laser applied in infrared mode, for pain and oedema at 48 h, MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I²â€¯= 92.13% and MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I²â€¯= 65.01%, respectively. The same is not true for trismus at 48 h, MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I²â€¯= 3.26%. The meta-analysis also presented results in respect of laser site of application and number of PBM sessions. CONCLUSIONS: PBM with infrared laser, in a combination intraoral and extraoral application, in one session in the immediate postoperative period, has been shown to be effective to achieve the objectives of reducing pain and oedema after third molar extraction.


Subject(s)
Edema , Low-Level Light Therapy , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Postoperative Complications , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Mandible/surgery , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology
12.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(4): 241, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573395

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of L-PRF as a healing agent in the postoperative period of third molar extraction surgeries, as well as to investigate secondary effects, such as the reduction of pain, edema and other discomforts after the surgical intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methodology adopted consisted of carrying out a systematic review of the literature, following the model outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The inclusion criteria were previously established according to a systematic review protocol approved by the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42023484679. In order to carry out a comprehensive search, a search in five databases was carried out, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase. RESULTS: The search resulted in the selection of randomized controlled trials that conformed to the established criteria. Two authors independently screened the records and extracted the data. The assessment of bias was conducted according to the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, using version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that L-PRF stands out by providing direct benefits to healing, vascularization and tissue regeneration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: L-PRF plays an important role in reducing postoperative pain, edema, the incidence of alveolar osteitis and infections after third molar removal surgery, compared to patients who did not undergo the use of L-PRF.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Postoperative Period , Fibrin , Leukocytes , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Edema/prevention & control
13.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 33(1): 97-100, 2024 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583033

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the effect of extracting the completely impacted teeth by minimally invasive surgery with preserving the buccal bone plate. METHODS: Eighty-six cases were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. In the experimental group, a fenestration was made with a ball drill to expose the buccal and lingual margin of crown, and the buccal bone plate was preserved. T-shaped crown cuttings were performed, minimally invasive extraction was conducted.In the control group, the distal and buccal bone plates were removed with a ball drill, the distal and buccal crowns were exposed, and T-shaped crown was cut. The other procedures were the same. The degree of swelling, restricted mouth opening and VAS pain score after operation were observed, the levels of C-reactive protein and anti-hemolytic streptoglobulin were detected by laboratory tests, and the periodontal probing depth(PD), bleeding index (BI), and clinical attachment loss(CAL) of the adjacent second molar were examined 1 month after surgery. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The swelling degree of the two groups was significantly relieved in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the degree of mouth opening limitation and pain (P>0.05). The level of C-reactive protein in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05). There was no significantly difference in the level of anti-hemolytic streptococcus between the 2 groups (P>0.05). One month after operation, the PD and CAL in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in BI(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The patients who preserve the buccal bone plate by minimally invasive extraction of impacted mandibular teeth have less reaction and better wound healing.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Bone Plates , C-Reactive Protein , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Pain
14.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 33(1): 71-75, 2024 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583028

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluation the effect of modified triangular flap-secondary healing (MTF-S) on the treatment of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth with full or partial bone impaction. METHODS: A total of 207 patients with mandibular impacted wisdom teeth were selected in Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital from June 2022 to June 2023. Among them, 86 patients had completely impacted wisdom teeth (group A), and 121 patients had partially impacted wisdom teeth (group B). All patients had bilateral impacted wisdom teeth. One of the wisdom teeth was removed first and was sutured with triangular flap-primary healing (TF-P). The other wisdom tooth was removed two weeks later and was sutured with MTF-S. Patients in groups A and B were divided into two subgroups based on suture methods, with TF-P used for group A1 and B1, and MTF-S used for groups A2 and B2. Perioperative indicators, including surgical time, root loss rate, and completeness of extraction sockets were recorded; Postoperative complications of four groups, including pain, swelling, and limited mouth opening were compared. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The surgical time of group A1, A2, B1 and B2 was (17.69±3.28), (18.22±3.06), (12.37±3.72) and (12.64±4.13) minutes, respectively. The surgical time of group A1 and A2 was significantly longer than that of group B1 and B2 (P<0.05). Seven days after surgery, the VAS scores of group A1, A2, B1 and B2 were (1.17±0.34), (0.93±0.29), (0.48±0.15) and (0.76±0.21), respectively. The VAS scores of group B1 and B2 were lower than those of group A1 and A2, and group A2 was lower than group A1 and B2 was higher than group B1 group(P<0.05). On the 1st day, 3rd day, and 7th day after surgery, the swelling degree in group A1 was greater than that in group B1, and the swelling degree in group B1 was greater than that in group A2 and B2(P<0.05); while the limitation of mouth opening mouth in group A2 and B2 was lower than that in group A1 and B1, and the limitation of opening mouth in group B2 was lower than that in group A2(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with partially impacted wisdom teeth, the extraction of completely impacted wisdom teeth has a longer surgical time. For completely impacted wisdom teeth, MTF-S is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain, swelling and mouth opening limitations. For partially impacted wisdom teeth, MTF-S is beneficial for reducing postoperative swelling and mouth opening limitations, but the effect is not significant in reducing patient pain.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Molar , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Crowns , Pain, Postoperative
15.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 456, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622566

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of endoscope-assisted fractured roots or fragments extraction within the mandibular canal, along with quantitative sensory testing (QST) alterations in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). METHODS: Six patients with lower lip numbness following mandibular third molar extraction were selected. All patients had broken roots or fragments within the mandibular canal that were extracted under real-time endoscopic assistance. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 7, and 35, including a standardized QST of the lower lip skin. RESULTS: The average surgical duration was 32.5 min, with the IAN exposed in all cases. Two of the patient exhibited complete recovery of lower lip numbness, three experienced symptom improvement, and one patient remained unaffected 35 days after the surgery. Preoperative QST results showed that the mechanical detection and pain thresholds on the affected side were significantly higher than those on the healthy side, but improved significantly by postoperative day 7 in five patients, and returned to baseline in two patients on day 35. There were no significant differences in the remaining QST parameters. CONCLUSIONS: All endoscopic surgical procedures were successfully completed without any additional postoperative complications. There were no cases of deterioration of IAN injury, and lower lip numbness recovered in the majority of cases. Endoscopy allowed direct visualization and examination of the affected nerve, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the IAN.


Subject(s)
Tooth, Impacted , Trigeminal Nerve Injuries , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hypesthesia/complications , Hypesthesia/surgery , Mandibular Canal , Trigeminal Nerve Injuries/etiology , Mandible/surgery , Mandibular Nerve , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Radiography, Panoramic/methods
16.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8828, 2024 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632471

ABSTRACT

The aim of this split-mouth randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical outcomes (operative time, edema, trismus, and pain), the immediate histological effects, the alveolar repair (2 and 4 months), and the quality of life after the extraction of impacted third molars using high-speed pneumatic and electrical rotation. Sixteen patients underwent extraction of the two mandibular third molars with a minimum interval of 15 days. On one side of the participant's mouth, high-speed pneumatic rotation was used (Control Group-CG) while for the other side, high-speed electrical rotation was used (Study Group-SG). Statistical analysis included ANOVA repeated measures and Pearson correlations. SG group showed: shorter operative time (p = 0.019), less pain (p = 0.034), swelling (p < 0.001) and trismus (p = 0.025) on the 1st postoperative day; less pain (p = 0.034) and trismus (p = 0.010) on the 3rd postoperative day; less trismus (p = 0.032) on the 7th postoperative day; and better quality of life (p = 0.007). No differences were observed for peripheral bone damage or bone density of alveolar repair at 2 and 4 months between groups. Electric high-speed rotation provided better postoperative clinical parameters of pain, edema and trismus when compared with pneumatic high-speed rotation for mandibular third molar surgery.Trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials registration number RBR-4xyqhqm ( https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4xyqhqm ).


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Trismus , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Rotation , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Pain, Postoperative , Tooth Extraction , Mouth , Edema
18.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 52(2): 153-160, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642350

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To evaluate the state of the gingival stromal elements in the portion of the third molars requiring extraction of these teeth due to orthodontic indications considering the stage of tooth germ formation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The surgery to extract third molars due to orthodontic indications was performed on 95 children aged 11 to 18 years. The three groups of observation were isolated according to clinical-radiological signs: І (n=30) - children aged 11-13 years; ІІ (n=35) - children aged 13-16 years, and ІІІ (n=30) - children aged 16-18 years. During surgery, the samples of gums were taken from the adjacent areas for examination. The samples were fixed, dehydrated, paraffinized for further histological processing. Immunohistochemical methods were used according to the protocols supplied by a producer. In particular, by means of immunohistochemical method, Ki-67, CD-34 antigens and vimentin with primary antibodies against them were determined. The primary antibodies were visualized by the polymeric visualization system with diaminobenzidine giving a brown color to the places of location of the antigens examined. The data obtained were statistically processed. RESULTS: Results: The results of the study showed that specific gravity of the vascular bed in the gingival papillary layer of children was the most variable. It ranges from (12,7±0,09) % at the stage of "D" root formation to (54,8±0,17) % at the "H" stage. Lower concentrations of CD-34 antigens and vimentin are found in the endotheliocytes of children aged 13-16 and 16-18 years, compared to the children aged 11-13 years (p<0,05). No changes were found in the specific volume of the blood vessels, CD-34 antigens and vimentin in the reticular gingival layer of children from the groups of observation. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Therefore, the conducted histological and immunohistochemical study of the connective gingival tissues in the portion of the third molars in children enables to draw a conclusion that in the process of formation of the root of this tooth a number of changes occur in the gingival stroma. They include an increase of the blood flow volume in the papillary gingival layer on the background of a decreased concentration of CD-34 genes and vimentin, a longer stage of development of the third molar root. The specific volume of the islets of neoangiogenesis of the papillary gingival layer is the largest in children aged 13-16 years.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Child , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Vimentin
19.
Quintessence Int ; 55(5): 380-390, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF) and concentrated growth factor on postoperative pain, edema, trismus, and quality of life in impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The primary aim of this study was to minimize common sequelae following third molar surgery by using iPRF and concentrated growth factor. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative effects of these products. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This study represents a single-center, randomized prospective clinical trial conducted at the Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry. It involved patients who underwent third molar surgery for various reasons between July and October 2022. The predictor variables were the use of concentrated growth factor and i-PRF. They were categorized as concentrated growth factor, i-PRF, and control groups. The outcome variables include pain levels and analgesic consumption measured on a visual analog scale, distances between predetermined anatomical points, maximum mouth opening capacity, and data from the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. RESULTS: Total analgesic use was notably lower in the concentrated growth factor group (P = .044). Concentrated growth factor and iPRF outperformed the control group in all edema measurements by postoperative day 7 (tragus-pogonion, lateral canthus-angulus, tragus-commissura; P < .05). Concentrated growth factor significantly reduced trismus on days 2 and 7. Quality of life was notably higher in the concentrated growth factor group than in the control group (P = .026), although iPRF group differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that concentrated growth factor has a limited impact on postoperative pain, but significantly reduces edema, trismus, and enhances quality of life. The iPRF group experienced positive effects on pain, edema, and trismus, although the statistically significant differences observed with concentrated growth factor highlight its potential for use instead of iPRF after third molar surgery. An increased sample size is essential for more comprehensive results.


Subject(s)
Edema , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Quality of Life , Tooth, Impacted , Trismus , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Adult , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction , Pain Measurement , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use
20.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(4): 231, 2024 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of complementary and alternative treatments on postoperative pain following lower third molar surgeries. METHODS: A comprehensive search of Electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and grey literature was conducted up until May 2022. Randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of acupuncture, ozone therapy, laser (LLLT), drainage tube, kinesio-taping, ice therapy, and compressions on pain after LTM surgeries were included. The estimated mean differences (MD) for alternative therapies were pooled using the frequentist approach to random-model network meta-analysis NMA. RESULTS: Eighty-two papers were included in the qualitative analysis; 33 of them were included in the quantitative analyzes. NMA revealed that drainage tube and kinesio-taping were superior in controlling pain 24-hours postoperatively than no-treatment. At 48-hours follow-up, kinesio-taping and LLLT more effective than placebo and drainage tube; and kinesio-taping and LLLT were superior to no treatment. At 72 h postoperatively, ozone therapy was superior to placebo; and drainage tube, kinesio-taping, and LLLT were better than no treatment. At 7-days follow-up, ozone and LLLT were superior to placebo; and LLLT and kinesio-taping were superior to no treatment. The SUCRA-ranking placed drainage tube as top-ranking intervention at 48-hours (98.2%) and 72-hours (96%) follow-ups, and ozone (83.5%) at 7-days follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that these alternative and complementary therapies may be useful in reducing postoperative pain after LTM surgeries, and may offer advantages when combined to traditional pain management methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Non-pharmacological therapies are gaining popularity among healthcare professionals and patients. This study found that some of these therapies, specifically kinesio-taping and drainage tube were effective in controlling postoperative pain after third molar surgeries. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, as they highlight the potential benefits of incorporating these therapies into postoperative pain management plans.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Ozone , Humans , Pain Management , Molar, Third/surgery , Network Meta-Analysis , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Ozone/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...