Targeting the Small GTPase Superfamily through Their Regulatory Proteins.

The Ras superfamily of small GTPases are guanine-nucleotide-dependent switches essential for numerous cellular processes. Mutations or dysregulation of these proteins are associated with many diseases, but unsuccessful attempts to target the small GTPases directly have resulted in them being classed as "undruggable". The GTP-dependent signaling of these proteins is controlled by their regulators; guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), and in the Rho and Rab subfamilies, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). This review covers the recent small molecule and biologics strategies to target the small GTPases through their regulators. It seeks to critically re-evaluate recent chemical biology practice, such as the presence of PAINs motifs and the cell-based readout using compounds that are weakly potent or of unknown specificity. It highlights the vast scope of potential approaches for targeting the small GTPases in the future through their regulatory proteins.

Comparative phylogenetic and expression analysis of small GTPases families in legume and non-legume plants.

BACKGROUND: Small monomeric GTPases act as molecular switches in several processes that involve polar cell growth, participating mainly in vesicle trafficking and cytoskeleton rearrangements. This gene superfamily has largely expanded in plants through evolution as compared with other Kingdoms, leading to the suggestion that members of each subfamily might have acquired new functions associated to plant-specific processes. Legume plants engage in a nitrogen-fixing symbiotic interaction with rhizobia in a process that involves polar growth processes associated with the infection throughout the root hair. To get insight into the evolution of small GTPases associated with this process, we use a comparative genomic approach to establish differences in the Ras GTPase superfamily between legume and non-legume plants. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses did not show clear differences in the organization of the different subfamilies of small GTPases between plants that engage or not in nodule symbiosis. Protein alignments revealed a strong conservation at the sequence level of small GTPases previously linked to nodulation by functional genetics. Interestingly, one Rab and three Rop proteins showed conserved amino acid substitutions in legumes, but these changes do not alter the predicted conformational structure of these proteins. Although the steady-state levels of most small GTPases do not change in response to rhizobia, we identified a subset of Rab, Rop and Arf genes whose transcript levels are modulated during the symbiotic interaction, including their spatial distribution along the indeterminate nodule. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive study of the small GTPase superfamily in several plant species. The genetic program associated to root nodule symbiosis includes small GTPases to fulfill specific functions during infection and formation of the symbiosomes. These GTPases seems to have been recruited from members that were already present in common ancestors with plants as distant as monocots since we failed to detect asymmetric evolution in any of the subfamily trees. Expression analyses identified a number of legume members that can have undergone neo- or sub-functionalization associated to the spatio-temporal transcriptional control during the onset of the symbiotic interaction.

Structures of Ras superfamily effector complexes: What have we learnt in two decades?

The Ras superfamily small G proteins are master regulators of a diverse range of cellular processes and act via downstream effector molecules. The first structure of a small G protein-effector complex, that of Rap1A with c-Raf1, was published 20 years ago. Since then, the structures of more than 60 small G proteins in complex with their effectors have been published. These effectors utilize a diverse array of structural motifs to interact with the G protein fold, which we have divided into four structural classes: intermolecular ß-sheets, helical pairs, other interactions, and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. These classes and their representative structures are discussed and a contact analysis of the interactions is presented, which highlights the common effector-binding regions between and within the small G protein families.

[Small, monomeric G proteins in plants]. / Male, monomeryczne bialka G roslin.

The superfamily of small, monomeric GTP-binding proteins, in Arabidopsis thaliana comprising 93 members, is classified into four families: Arf/Sar, Rab, Rop/Rac, and Ran families. All monomeric G proteins function as molecular switches that are activated by GTP and inactivated by the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP. GTP/GDP cycling is controlled by three classes of regulatory protein: guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and guanine-nucleotide-dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). Proteins of Arf family are primarily involved in regulation of membrane traffic and organization of the cytoskeleton. Arf1/Sar1 proteins regulate the formation of vesicle coat at different steps in the exocytic and endocytic pathways. Rab GTPases are regulators of vesicular transport. They are involved in vesicle formation, recruitment of cytoskeletal motor proteins, and in vesicle tethering and fusion. Rop proteins serve as key regulators of cytoskeletal reorganization in response to extracellular signals. Several data have also shown that Rop proteins play additional roles in membrane trafficking and regulation of enzymes activity. Ran proteins are involved in nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Rem2 GTPase controls proliferation and apoptosis of neurons during embryo development.

We have recently found that Rem2 GTPase, highly expressed in human embryonic stem cells (hESC), maintains the cell cycle and controls proper differentiation towards ectoderm, suggesting a role in neuronal development. We describe here the use of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model to determine the physiological significance of Rem2 during embryogenesis. We show that Rem2 RNA is highly expressed in zebrafish embryos up to 2 hours of development followed by a decrease in expression until 48 hours when afterwards Rem2 is switched on again until 5 days. In situ expression analysis reveals that Rem2 is expressed exclusively in the tectum of the brain and eye of the zebrafish. Rem2 morpholino demonstrates impaired embryo development resulting in loss of neural tissue. We show that the mechanism of action of Rem2 is to control apoptosis and proliferation, peaking at 36 hours of development. Rem2 is down-regulated under general differentiation conditions of hESC and is lower expressed in most differentiated cells; however, it is upregulated with neuronal development. This suggests that Rem2 is critical for neuronal development during embryogenesis by regulating proliferation and apoptosis. We propose a model in which Rem2 GTPase is a key regulator maintaining pluripotency during early stages of embryogenesis and survival of neurons during later embryonic development.

T-RMSD: a fine-grained, structure-based classification method and its application to the functional characterization of TNF receptors.

This study addresses the relation between structural and functional similarity in proteins. We introduce a novel method named tree based on root mean square deviation (T-RMSD), which uses distance RMSD (dRMSD) variations to build fine-grained structure-based classifications of proteins. The main improvement of the T-RMSD over similar methods, such as Dali, is its capacity to produce the equivalent of a bootstrap value for each cluster node. We validated our approach on two domain families studied extensively for their role in many biological and pathological pathways: the small GTPase RAS superfamily and the cysteine-rich domains (CRDs) associated with the tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) family. Our analysis showed that T-RMSD is able to automatically recover and refine existing classifications. In the case of the small GTPase ARF subfamily, T-RMSD can distinguish GTP- from GDP-bound states, while in the case of CRDs it can identify two new subgroups associated with well defined functional features (ligand binding and formation of ligand pre-assembly complex). We show how hidden Markov models (HMMs) can be built on these new groups and propose a methodology to use these models simultaneously in order to do fine-grained functional genomic annotation without known 3D structures. T-RMSD, an open source freeware incorporated in the T-Coffee package, is available online.

The RJL family of small GTPases is an ancient eukaryotic invention probably functionally associated with the flagellar apparatus.

A patchily distributed gene family is often taken as evidence for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events, but it may also result solely from multiple gene losses. The RJL family of uncharacterised Ras-like GTPases was previously suggested to have undergone HGT events between protists and deuterostome metazoans, owing to the apparent absence of RJL in intermediate groups (Nepomuceno-Silva, J.L., de Melo, L.D., Mendonca, S.M., Paixao, J.C., Lopes, U.G., 2004. RJLs: a new family of Ras-related GTP-binding proteins. Gene 327, 221-232). We have reanalysed the phylogenetic distribution and phylogeny of the RJL family, taking advantage of the recent expansion of sequence data available from diverse eukaryotes. We found that RJL orthologs are much more widely distributed than previously assumed. At least one representative encoding an RJL protein could be identified for each of the six major eukaryotic "supergroups" (Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, Excavata, Archaeplastida, Chromalveolata, and Rhizaria) as well as for a species of Apusomonadida, a deep lineage that may not be specifically related to any of the recognized supergroups. Phylogenetic analyses do not support HGT of RJL genes between the major eukaryotic lineages, indicating that the RJL family was present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor and was lost several times over the course of eukaryotic evolution. Interestingly, RJL was lost from all taxa lacking flagellated cells and from a few lineages that build structurally unusual or reduced flagella, raising the intriguing possibility that RJL proteins are functionally associated with the flagellar apparatus. The RJL GTPase domain has been fused with the DnaJ domain on two separate occasions: in the Holozoa (before the split of Metazoa and choanoflagellates), giving rise to the previously known Rbj type of RJL with the DnaJ domain at the C-terminus, and independently in Alveolata resulting in novel proteins with the DnaJ domain at the N-terminus. These independent fusions suggest that RJL proteins may generally function via regulating the DnaJ-Hsp70 module.

Conversion of plasma membrane topology during epithelial tube connection requires Arf-like 3 small GTPase in Drosophila.

The development of tubular organs often involves the hollowing of cells into a torus (doughnut shape), as observed in blood vessel formation in vertebrates and tracheal development in insects. During the fusion of Drosophila tracheal branches, fusion cells located at the tip of migrating branches contact each other and form intracellular luminal cavities on opposite sides of the cells that open to connect the tubule lumens. This process involves the intracellular fusion of plasma membranes associated with microtubule tracks. Here, we studied the function of an evolutionarily conserved small GTPase, Arf-like 3, in branch fusion. Arf-like 3 is N-terminally acetylated, and associates with both intracellular vesicles and microtubules. In Arf-like 3 mutants, the cell adhesion of fusion cells, specification of apical membrane domains, and secretion of luminal extracellular matrix proceeded normally, but the luminal cavities did not open due to the failure of intracellular fusion of the plasma membranes. We present evidence that the Arf-like 3 mutation impairs the localized assembly of the exocyst complex, suggesting that the targeting of exocytosis machinery to specific apical domains is the key step in converting the plasma membrane topology in fusion cells.

The small G proteins of the Arf family and their regulators.

Small G proteins play a central role in the organization of the secretory and endocytic pathways. The majority of such small G proteins are members of the Rab family, which are anchored to the bilayer by C-terminal prenyl groups. However, the recruitment of some effectors, including vesicle coat proteins, is mediated by a second class of small G proteins that is unique in having an N-terminal amphipathic helix that becomes available for membrane insertion upon GTP binding. Sar1, Arf1, and Arf6 are the best-characterized members of this ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) family. In addition, all eukaryotes contain additional distantly related G proteins, often called Arf like, or Arls. The complete Arf family in humans has 29 members. The roles of these related G proteins are poorly understood, but recent work has shown that some are involved in membrane traffic or organizing the cytoskeleton. Here we review what is known about all the members of the Arf family, along with the known regulatory molecules that convert them between GDP- and GTP-bound states.

Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases.

Sequences and available structures were compared for all the widely distributed representatives of the P-loop GTPases and GTPase-related proteins with the aim of constructing an evolutionary classification for this superclass of proteins and reconstructing the principal events in their evolution. The GTPase superclass can be divided into two large classes, each of which has a unique set of sequence and structural signatures (synapomorphies). The first class, designated TRAFAC (after translation factors) includes enzymes involved in translation (initiation, elongation, and release factors), signal transduction (in particular, the extended Ras-like family), cell motility, and intracellular transport. The second class, designated SIMIBI (after signal recognition particle, MinD, and BioD), consists of signal recognition particle (SRP) GTPases, the assemblage of MinD-like ATPases, which are involved in protein localization, chromosome partitioning, and membrane transport, and a group of metabolic enzymes with kinase or related phosphate transferase activity. These two classes together contain over 20 distinct families that are further subdivided into 57 subfamilies (ancient lineages) on the basis of conserved sequence motifs, shared structural features, and domain architectures. Ten subfamilies show a universal phyletic distribution compatible with presence in the last universal common ancestor of the extant life forms (LUCA). These include four translation factors, two OBG-like GTPases, the YawG/YlqF-like GTPases (these two subfamilies also consist of predicted translation factors), the two signal-recognition-associated GTPases, and the MRP subfamily of MinD-like ATPases. The distribution of nucleotide specificity among the proteins of the GTPase superclass indicates that the common ancestor of the entire superclass was a GTPase and that a secondary switch to ATPase activity has occurred on several independent occasions during evolution. The functions of most GTPases that are traceable to LUCA are associated with translation. However, in contrast to other superclasses of P-loop NTPases (RecA-F1/F0, AAA+, helicases, ABC), GTPases do not participate in NTP-dependent nucleic acid unwinding and reorganizing activities. Hence, we hypothesize that the ancestral GTPase was an enzyme with a generic regulatory role in translation, with subsequent diversification resulting in acquisition of diverse functions in transport, protein trafficking, and signaling. In addition to the classification of previously known families of GTPases and related ATPases, we introduce several previously undetected families and describe new functional predictions.

Regulatory proteins of R-Ras, TC21/R-Ras2, and M-Ras/R-Ras3.

We studied the regulation of three closely related members of Ras family G proteins, R-Ras, TC21 (also known as R-Ras2), and M-Ras (R-Ras3). Guanine nucleotide exchange of R-Ras and TC21 was promoted by RasGRF, C3G, CalDAG-GEFI, CalDAG-GEFII (RasGRP), and CalDAG-GEFIII both in 293T cells and in vitro. By contrast, guanine nucleotide exchange of M-Ras was promoted by the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the classical Ras (Ha-, K-, and N-), including mSos, RasGRF, CalDAG-GEFII, and CalDAG-GEFIII. GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ras, Gap1(m), p120 GAP, and NF-1 stimulated all of the R-Ras, TC21, and M-Ras proteins, whereas R-Ras GAP stimulated R-Ras and TC21 but not M-Ras. We did not find any remarkable difference in the subcellular localization of R-Ras, TC21, or M-Ras when these were expressed with a green fluorescent protein tag in 293T cells and MDCK cells. In conclusion, TC21 and R-Ras were regulated by the same GEFs and GAPs, whereas M-Ras was regulated as the classical Ras.

The human Nm23/nucleoside diphosphate kinases.

Biochemical experiments over the past 40 years have shown that nucleoside diphosphate (NDP) kinase activity, which catalyzes phosphoryl transfer from a nucleoside triphosphate to a nucleoside diphosphate, is ubiquitously found in organisms from bacteria to human. Over the past 10 years, eight human genes of the nm23/NDP kinase family have been discovered that can be separated into two groups based on analysis of their sequences. In addition to catalysis, which may not be exhibited by all isoforms, evidence for regulatory roles has come recently from the discovery of the genes nm23 and awd, which encode NDP kinases and are involved in tumor metastasis and Drosophila development, respectively. Current work shows that the human NDP kinase genes are differentially expressed in tissues and that their products are targeted to different subcellular locations. This suggests that Nm23/NDP kinases possess different, but specific, functions within the cell, depending on their localization. The roles of NDP kinases in metabolic pathways and nucleic acid synthesis are discussed.