Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 131
Filter
1.
Laeknabladid ; 110(6): 298-306, 2024 Jun.
Article in Icelandic | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809220

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: High FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di, monosaccharides and polyols) foods have been linked with worsening symptoms of IBS patients. The aim was to compare gastrointestinal symptoms and dietary intake of patients with irritable bowel syndrome following a low FODMAP diet, with or without individual nutrition therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients that met Rome IV criteria for IBS were randomized into two groups, guided group (individual nutrition therapy, n=28) and self-management group (learned about low FODMAP diet online, n=26). Both groups followed low FODMAP diet for 4 weeks. Four-day food records were used to assess dietary intake. Symptoms were assessed by the IBS-severity scoring system (ISB-SSS). RESULTS: The number of subjects who did not complete the study was 13, thereof five in the nutrition therapy and eight in the self-management group, leaving 23 and 18 subjects available for analysis, respectively. Symptoms declined from baseline to endpoint in both groups, by 183±101 points on average in the group receiving nutrition therapy (p< 0.001) and 132±110 points in the self-management group (p< 0.001), with no difference between groups. At baseline, about 80% of meals in both groups contained food high in FODMAP's. The corresponding proportion was 9% and 36% in week 3 in the nutrition therapy and self-management group, respectively (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both groups experienced relieve of symptoms, but compliance to the low FODMAP diet was better in the group receiving individual nutrition therapy compared with the group who only received instructions on how to learn about low FODMAP diet online.


Subject(s)
Fermentation , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Monosaccharides , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Polymers/adverse effects , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/adverse effects , Adult , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Male , Female , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Carbohydrates/adverse effects , Oligosaccharides/adverse effects , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Nutritive Value , FODMAP Diet
2.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(6): 507-520, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dietary advice and medical treatments are recommended to patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have not yet compared the efficacy of dietary treatment with pharmacological treatment targeting the predominant IBS symptom. We therefore aimed to compare the effects of two restrictive dietary treatment options versus optimised medical treatment in people with IBS. METHODS: This single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a specialised outpatient clinic at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe IBS (Rome IV; IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] ≥175) and no other serious diseases or food allergies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by web-based randomisation to receive a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) plus traditional IBS dietary advice recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (hereafter the LFTD diet), a fibre-optimised diet low in total carbohydrates and high in protein and fat (hereafter the low-carbohydrate diet), or optimised medical treatment based on predominant IBS symptom. Participants were masked to the names of the diets, but the pharmacological treatment was open-label. The intervention lasted 4 weeks, after which time participants in the dietary interventions were unmasked to their diets and encouraged to continue during 6 months' follow-up, participants in the LFTD group were instructed on how to reintroduce FODMAPs, and participants receiving pharmacological treatment were offered diet counselling and to continue with their medication. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who responded to the 4-week intervention, defined as a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS relative to baseline, and was analysed per modified intention-to-treat (ie, all participants who started the intervention). Safety was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970591, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2017, and Sept 2, 2021, 1104 participants were assessed for eligibility and 304 were randomly assigned. Ten participants did not receive their intervention after randomisation and thus 294 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (96 assigned to the LFTD diet, 97 to the low-carbohydrate diet, and 101 to optimised medical treatment). 241 (82%) of 294 participants were women and 53 (18%) were men and the mean age was 38 (SD 13). After 4 weeks, 73 (76%) of 96 participants in the LFTD diet group, 69 (71%) of 97 participants in the low-carbohydrate diet group, and 59 (58%) of 101 participants in the optimised medical treatment group had a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS compared with baseline, with a significant difference between the groups (p=0·023). 91 (95%) of 96 participants completed 4 weeks in the LFTD group, 92 (95%) of 97 completed 4 weeks in the low-carbohydrate group, and 91 (90%) of 101 completed 4 weeks in the optimised medical treatment group. Two individuals in each of the intervention groups stated that adverse events were the reason for discontinuing the 4-week intervention. Five (5%) of 91 participants in the optimised medical treatment group stopped treatment prematurely due to side-effects. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Two 4-week dietary interventions and optimised medical treatment reduced the severity of IBS symptoms, with a larger effect size in the diet groups. Dietary interventions might be considered as an initial treatment for patients with IBS. Research is needed to enable personalised treatment strategies. FUNDING: The Healthcare Board Region Västra Götaland, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, AFA Insurance, grants from the Swedish state, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Science Foundation, Skandia, the Dietary Science Foundation, and the Nanna Swartz Foundation.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted , Disaccharides , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Monosaccharides , Oligosaccharides , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Female , Male , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Single-Blind Method , Adult , Middle Aged , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Polymers , Fermentation , Sweden , Severity of Illness Index , FODMAP Diet
3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(2): 301-309, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prospective trials evaluating efficacy of specific diet restriction in functional dyspepsia (FD) are scarce. We aimed to assess efficacy of low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet in FD, compared with traditional dietary advice (TDA). METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind trial, patients with FD (Rome IV) were randomized into low FODMAP diet (LFD) and TDA groups, for 4 weeks (phase I). In phase II (4-12 weeks), LFD group was advised systematic re-introduction of FODMAPs. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed using "Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI)." Primary outcome was symptomatic response (symptom score reduction of ≥ 50%), at 4 weeks. Study was registered with CTRI (2019/06/019852). RESULTS: Of 184 patients screened, 105 were randomized to LFD (n = 54) and TDA (n = 51) groups. At 4 weeks, both groups showed significant reduction in SF-NDI symptom scores compared with baseline, with no significant difference in inter-group response rates [LFD: 66.7% (36/54); TDA: 56.9% (29/51); P = 0.32]. On sub-group analysis, patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating had significantly better symptomatic response with LFD (P = 0.04). SF-NDI quality of life scores improved significantly in both groups. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting response to LFD were bloating and male gender. Incidences of adverse events (minor) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FD, LFD and TDA lead to significant symptomatic and quality of life improvement. Patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating respond significantly better to LFD. Therefore, dietary advice for FD should be individualized according to FD subtype.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted , Dyspepsia , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Dyspepsia/diet therapy , Female , Fermentation , Humans , Male , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/adverse effects , Polymers/administration & dosage , Polymers/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
4.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 115(2): 344-352, 2022 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been associated with diets rich in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs), and gluten. Most previous studies have been single-blind and have focused on the elimination of FODMAPs or provocation with single FODMAPs. The effect of gluten is unclear, large trials isolating the effect of gluten from that of FODMAPs are needed. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to ensure high intakes of a wide range of FODMAPs, gluten, or placebo, and to evaluate the effects on IBS symptoms using the IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS). METHODS: The study was carried out with a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized 3-way crossover design in a clinical facility in Uppsala from September 2018 to June 2019. In all, 110 participants fulfilling the IBS Rome IV criteria, with moderate to severe IBS, were randomly assigned; 103 (90 female, 13 male) completed the trial. Throughout, IBS participants maintained a diet with minimal FODMAP content and no gluten. Participants were block-randomly assigned to 1-wk interventions with FODMAPs (50 g/d), gluten (17.3 g/d), or placebo, separated by 1-wk washout. All participants who completed ≥1 intervention were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: In participants with IBS (n = 103), FODMAPs caused higher IBS-SSS scores (mean 240 [95% CI: 222, 257]) than placebo (198 [180, 215]; P = 0.00056) or gluten (208 [190, 226]; P = 0.013); no differences were found between the placebo and gluten groups (P = 1.0). There were large interindividual differences in IBS-SSS scores associated with treatment. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: In participants with IBS, FODMAPs had a modest effect on typical IBS symptoms, whereas gluten had no effect. The large interindividual differences in responses to the interventions warrant further detailed studies to identify possible underlying causes and enable individual prediction of responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03653689.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Diet, Gluten-Free/methods , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fermentation , Glutens/administration & dosage , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Polymers/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
5.
Molecules ; 26(19)2021 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34641464

ABSTRACT

The combination of saccharides in the composition of a cryopreservation medium may represent a promising method for the preservation of the reproductive cells of male birds. In the current study, cryoprotective media with a combined composition of mono- and di-saccharides were developed. The degree of penetration of reducing saccharide molecules (maltose-Mal20 medium) and non-reducing disaccharide molecules (trehalose-Treh20 medium) from the cryoprotective medium into the cytosol of rooster spermatozoa was studied. LCM control media without disaccharides were used as the control. The number of maltose molecules penetrating from the outside into the cytosol of the spermatozoon was 1.06 × 104, and the number of trehalose molecules was 3.98 × 104. Using a combination of maltose and fructose, the progressive motility of frozen/thawed semen and the fertility rates of eggs were significantly higher ((p < 0.05) 40.2% and 68.5%, respectively) than when using a combination of trehalose and fructose in a cryoprotective diluent (33.4% and 62.4%, respectively). A higher rate of chromatin integrity at the level of 92.4% was obtained when using Treh20 versus 74.5% Mal20 (p < 0.05). Maltose positively affected the preservation of frozen/thawed sperm in the genital tract of hens. On the seventh day from the last insemination when using Mal20, the fertilization of eggs was 42.6% and only 27.3% when using Treh20. Despite the same molecular weight, maltose and trehalose have different physicochemical and biological properties that determine their function and effectiveness as components of cryoprotective media.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/veterinary , Cryoprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Sperm Motility , Animals , Chickens , Cryopreservation/methods , Male , Semen Preservation/methods
6.
Clin Nutr ; 40(10): 5269-5277, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34536637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between intake of simple sugars and cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and total mortality in a prospective cohort study based on the PREDIMED trial conducted from 2003 to 2010. METHODS: Participants were older individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Exposures were total sugar, glucose and fructose from solid or liquid sources, and fructose from fruit and 100% fruit juice. Cancer incidence was the primary outcome; cancer mortality and all-cause mortality were secondary outcomes. Multivariable-adjusted, time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models were used. RESULTS: Of 7447 individuals enrolled, 7056 (94.7%) were included (57.6% women, aged 67.0 ± 6.2 years). 534 incident cancers with 152 cancer deaths and 409 all-cause deaths were recorded after a median follow-up of 6 years. Intake of simple sugars in solid form was unrelated to outcomes. Higher cancer incidence was found per 5 g/day increase in intake of liquid sugars, with multivariable-adjusted HR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.13) for total liquid sugar, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31) for liquid glucose, 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05-1.23) for liquid fructose, and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.10-1.74) for fructose from fruit juice. Cancer and all-cause mortality increased to a similar extent with intake of all sugars in liquid form. In categorical models, cancer risk was dose-related for all liquid sugars. CONCLUSIONS: Simple sugar intake in drinks and fruit juice was associated with an increased risk of overall cancer incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality. This suggests that sugary beverages are a modifiable risk factor for cancer and all-cause mortality.


Subject(s)
Dietary Sugars/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Beverages , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cohort Studies , Diet , Eating , Female , Fructose/administration & dosage , Fruit and Vegetable Juices , Glucose/administration & dosage , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sucrose/administration & dosage
7.
Nutrients ; 13(6)2021 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34072914

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, gluten and FODMAP food components (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) are increasingly studied due to their possible relation with extraintestinal-associated conditions. In recent years, gluten-free diets (GFD) and low-FODMAP diets (LFD) are becoming more popular not only in order to avoid the food components that cause intolerances or allergies in some people, but also due to the direct influence of marketing movements or diet trends on feeding habits. Likewise, neurological and psychiatric diseases are currently of increasing importance in developed countries. For this reason, a bibliographic systematic review has been carried out to analyse whether there is a pathophysiological relationship between the dietary intake of gluten or FODMAPs with mental disorders. This review collects 13 clinical and randomized controlled trials, based on the PRISMA statement, which have been published in the last ten years. Based on these results, limiting or ruling out gluten or FODMAPs in the diet might be beneficial for symptoms such as depression, anxiety (7 out of 7 articles found any positive effect), or cognition deficiency (improvements in several cognition test measurements in one trial), and to a lesser extent for schizophrenia and the autism spectrum. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to obtain completely reliable conclusions.


Subject(s)
Diet/methods , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fermentation , Glutens , Humans , Male
8.
Gastroenterology ; 161(2): 463-475.e13, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33865841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral monosaccharides and disaccharides are used to measure in vivo human gut permeability through urinary excretion. AIMS: The aims were as follows: (1) to obtain normative data on small intestinal and colonic permeability; (2) to assess variance on standard 16 g fiber diet performed twice; (3) to determine whether dietary fiber influences gut permeability measurements; and (4) to present pilot data using 2 selected probes in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). METHODS: Sixty healthy female and male adults, age 18-70 years, participated in 3 randomized studies (2 studies on 16.25 g and 1 study on 32.5 g fiber) in otherwise standardized diets. At each test, the following sugars were ingested: 12C-mannitol, 13C-mannitol, rhamnose (monosaccharides), sucralose, and lactulose (disaccharides). Standardized meals were administered from 24 hours before and during 24 hours post-sugars with 3 urine collections: 0-2, 2-8, and 8-24 hours. Sugars were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Eighteen patients with IBS-D underwent 24-hour excretion studies after oral 13C-mannitol and lactulose. RESULTS: Baseline sugars (>3-fold above lower limits of quantitation) were identified in the 3 studies: 12C-mannitol in all participants; sucralose in 4-8, and rhamnose in 1-3. Median excretions/24 h (percentage of administered dose) for 13C-mannitol, rhamnose, lactulose, and sucralose were ∼30%, ∼15%, 0.32%, and 2.3%, respectively. 13C-mannitol and rhamnose reflected mainly small intestinal permeability. Intraindividual saccharide excretions were consistent, with minor differences with 16.25 g vs 32.5 g fiber diets. Median interindividual coefficient of variation was 76.5% (10-90 percentile: 34.6-111.0). There were no significant effects of sex, age, or body mass index on permeability measurements in health. 13C-mannitol measurements are feasible in IBS-D. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline 12C-mannitol excretion precludes its use; 13C-mannitol is the preferred probe for small intestinal permeability.


Subject(s)
Colon/metabolism , Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System , Disaccharides/urine , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestine, Small/metabolism , Monosaccharides/urine , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/urine , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/etiology , Diarrhea/urine , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber/metabolism , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/urine , Male , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Permeability , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Renal Elimination , Reproducibility of Results , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Urinalysis
9.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 23(89): e11-e16, ene.-mar. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-202614

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: uno de los primeros estímulos dolorosos al que es sometido un recién nacido sano es el cribado neonatal, mediante punción en el talón y extracción de muestra sanguínea. Tradicionalmente se ha tendido a menospreciar la sensibilidad al dolor neonatal y no se ha visto la necesidad de aplicar técnicas de analgesia para evitarlo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se diseñó un estudio experimental con una muestra de 106 recién nacidos en el Hospital San Pedro de Logroño (España) durante el año 2018. Se dividió la muestra en tres grupos en función de la analgesia recibida durante el procedimiento y se evaluó la respuesta al dolor mediante una escala validada. RESULTADOS: el dolor producido fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de no intervención frente a los grupos de suero glucosado o lactancia materna (p <0,001). Sin embargo, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos procedimientos analgésicos (p = 0,851). CONCLUSIONES: a la vista de los resultados, proponemos la implementación de estas intervenciones en otros procedimientos dolorosos. Los profesionales sanitarios han de tomar conciencia de la percepción del dolor en los procedimientos llevados a cabo tanto en el ámbito hospitalario como en Atención Primaria


INTRODUCTION: neonatal screening is one of the first painful stimuli in newborns. It consists in the extraction of a capillary blood sample by puncturing the heel. Neonatal pain is often underestimated and also the need to apply analgesia in these cases has not always been taken into account. PATIENTS AND METHODS: an experimental study was conducted on a sample of 106 newborns in the San Pedro Hospital in Logroño during 2018. Depending on the analgesia received during the heal lance, the population sample was divided into three groups. Pain response was evaluated using a validated scale. RESULTS: pain was significantly higher in the non-intervention group compared to the groups treated with glucose or breastfeeding (p <0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between both the analgesic procedures (p = 0.851). CONCLUSIONS: we propose the implementation of these interventions in other painful procedures. Health professionals must be aware of the perception of pain in the procedures carried out in Hospitals or Primary Care Centers


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Sucrose/administration & dosage , Analgesia , Breast Feeding , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Glucose/administration & dosage
10.
Int J Food Sci Nutr ; 72(7): 956-967, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541165

ABSTRACT

Children with coeliac disease (CD) following the gluten-free diet may experience ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms despite strict adherence. The study objective was to evaluate the association between foods high in fermentable oligo/di/monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) and gastrointestinal symptoms, and the potential implications to diet quality and health-related quality of life in CD children. Dietary intake was studied in age-sex matched children 5-18 years (CD, n = 46; non-coeliac mild chronic gastrointestinal complaints [GIC], n = 46; healthy controls [HC], n = 46). CD children consumed fewer foods high in FODMAPs compared to GIC and HC (p < .0001). FODMAP intake was not related to gastrointestinal symptoms in CD children (p > 0.05) but was positively associated with child health-related quality of life (p < 0.05). FODMAP intake from fruits and vegetables was positively associated with diet adequacy and total diet quality in CD children (p < 0.05). FODMAP intake may influence diet quality and health-related quality of life but has no impact on gastrointestinal symptoms in CD children.


Subject(s)
Celiac Disease , Diet, Gluten-Free , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Fermentation , Humans , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Oligosaccharides/adverse effects
11.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 51(8): 2800-2811, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33057858

ABSTRACT

Some research suggests that GI symptoms seen in children with ASD may relate to behavior problems. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the effect of the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet on GI and behavioral problems in children with ASD. At follow-up, the low FODMAP diet group had significant relief in some GI problems compared with both baseline in the group and control group. At baseline and at follow-up, there were no significant differences in behavioral problems between the low FODMAP diet group and the control group. Randomized controlled studies including larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects of low FODMAP diets in children with autism who have gastrointestinal problems.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder/diet therapy , Child Behavior Disorders/diet therapy , Eating/physiology , Energy Intake/physiology , Fermentation/physiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diet therapy , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/physiopathology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/physiopathology , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Eating/psychology , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/physiopathology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/psychology , Humans , Male , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Pilot Projects , Polymers/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
12.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 69(2): 218-221, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33268666

ABSTRACT

A robust ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) technique was proven effective for simultaneous characterization of six flavonoids including quercetin-3-O-beta-galactoside (Q3GAL), quercetin-3-O-beta-glucoside (Q3GLU), quercetin-3-(2-galloylglucoside) (Q3GG), kaempferol-3-O-beta-galactoside (K3GAL), kaempferol-3-O-beta-glucoside (K3GLU), and kaempferol-3-(2-galloylglucoside) (K3GG) in rat eyes. By investigation of corresponding validation parameters (linearity, selectivity, precision, accuracy, matrix effect, extraction recovery, and stability), the method was verified to be within current acceptable criteria. Thereafter, the validated method enabled quantification of the six compounds successful in rat eyes after oral administration of ethanol extract Diospyros kaki (EEDK) at 0, 3, 15, 35, 60, 120 min.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Diospyros/chemistry , Eye/chemistry , Flavonoids/analysis , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Administration, Oral , Animals , Diospyros/metabolism , Eye/metabolism , Flavonoids/administration & dosage , Galactosides/administration & dosage , Galactosides/analysis , Kaempferols/administration & dosage , Kaempferols/analysis , Male , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/analysis , Plant Leaves/chemistry , Plant Leaves/metabolism , Quercetin/administration & dosage , Quercetin/analogs & derivatives , Quercetin/analysis , Rats
13.
Nutrients ; 12(10)2020 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007886

ABSTRACT

The low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP)diet has been extensively researched, but not in the management of older adults with functional gastrointestinal symptoms. This study determines the positive and negative impacts of this dietary treatment in older adults with chronic diarrhea. A non-blinded intervention study was conducted with adults over 65 years with chronic diarrhea referred for colonoscopy where no cause was found. Participants followed a dietitian-led low FODMAP diet for six weeks and completed a structured assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, and a four-day food diary before and after the intervention. Twenty participants, mean age 76 years, were recruited. Adherence to the low FODMAP diet was acceptable; mean daily FODMAP intake reduced from 20.82 g to 3.75 g (p < 0.001) during the intervention and no clinically significant changes in macro- or micronutrient intakes were observed. There were clinically significant improvements in total gastrointestinal symptoms (pre diet 21.15/88 (standard deviation SD = 10.99), post diet 9.8/88 (SD = 9.58), p < 0.001) including diarrhea (pre diet 9.85 (SD = 3.84), post diet 4.05 (SD = 3.86), p < 0.001) and significant reductions in anxiety (pre diet 6.11/21 (SD = 4.31), post diet 4.26/21 (SD = 3.38), p < 0.05). In older adults the low FODMAP diet is clinically effective and does not jeopardise nutritional intake when supervised by an experienced dietitian.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/diet therapy , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diet therapy , Aged , Chronic Disease , Diarrhea/etiology , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fermentation , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Humans , Independent Living , Male , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816830

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) is an effective way to reduce gut symptoms in people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This diet reduces the intake of fermentable fibres, leading to changes of the gut microbiota and insufficient fermentation in the large bowel, resulting in reduced production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as butyrate, which has unfavourable implications for gut health, sleep and mental health. This study will examine the effect of Fibre-fix, a supplement containing a mix of dietary fibres, on the human gut microbiome composition, fermentative capacity, sleep, quality of life (QOL) and mental health of people with IBS who consume a low FODMAP diet (LFD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study design is proposed to examine whether Fibre-fix added to an existing LFD may help modulate gastrointestinal function, improve markers of sleep, mental health and promote QOL in patients with IBS. Participants will provide stool and blood samples, daily bowel symptoms diaries and 3-day diet records. Additionally, they will complete validated questionnaires relating to FODMAP intake, sleep, mental health and QOL before and after a 3-week intervention. Gut health will be assessed via faecal microbiome composition, faecal pH and SCFA levels. Alteration of sleep will be recorded using an actigraphy device worn by all participants over the whole study. Multivariate analysis will be used to examine the gut microbiome and repeated measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used for dependent variables from questionnaires related to bowel symptoms, stool type, sleep, mental health and QOL to assess the differences between intervention and control groups after adjustment for confounding variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Edith Cowan University (2019-00619-YAN). Results will be disseminated in peer-review journal publications, and conference presentations. Participants will be provided with a summary of findings once the study is completed. If Fibre-fix is shown to result in favourable changes in gut microbial composition, SCFA production, sleep and mental well-being without exacerbating symptoms, this will provide additional dietary management options for those with IBS following an LFD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000032954.


Subject(s)
Dietary Fiber/adverse effects , Fermentation/physiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diet therapy , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Fatty Acids, Volatile , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/blood , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/psychology , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/adverse effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Polymers/administration & dosage , Polymers/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Sleep/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
15.
Nutrients ; 12(3)2020 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32155878

ABSTRACT

Background. To date, there is no reliable marker for the diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), which benefits from a gluten-free diet (GFD). This condition is characterized by functional gastrointestinal symptoms similar to those occurring in the course of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, IBS has a higher prevalence, and often benefits from the administration of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet. The overlap of symptoms between these two pathologies has led to an overestimation of self-made diagnosis NCGS. Aims. To better identify NCGS in subjects with a previous diagnosis of IBS. Methods. All subjects received a low FODMAP diet that was also gluten-free (low FODMAP-GFD), and those presenting an improvement of symptoms were exposed to gluten or placebo (double-blind challenge with wash-out and crossover). The response to dietary treatments was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). Results. Of 30 patients (23 women, seven men, aged 42.2 ± 12.5 years, body mass index (BMI ) 24.7 ± 4.1 kg/m2), 26 benefited from the administration of low FODMAP-GFD and were exposed to the gluten/placebo challenge. After the challenge, using an increase of visual analogue scale VAS (Δ-VAS) ≥30%, 46.1% of the patients were NCGS+. However, this percentage became only 19.2% using a different method (mean ∆-VAS score plus two standard deviations). Conclusions. FODMAP intolerance could hide the response to a challenge test with gluten for the identification of NCGS in IBS patients. A low FODMAP-GFD followed by gluten/placebo challenge is able to identify patients with NCGS better. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT04017585.


Subject(s)
Diet, Gluten-Free , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Glutens/adverse effects , Glutens/immunology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/immunology , Adult , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fermentation , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Polymers/administration & dosage
16.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 120(4): 535-547, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31029650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may modify their diet, which may pose nutritional risk. Further, some dietary approaches, such as a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs), are restrictive and may contribute to nutritional inadequacy. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate habitual nutrient intake, diet quality, and diversity in IBS and the effect of a 4-week low FODMAP diet on these parameters compared with controls. DESIGN: Data from two randomized controlled trials were included for this secondary analysis. Participants were randomized to low FODMAP diet (n=63) or control diet (sham diet n=48, habitual diet n=19). PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants included 130 individuals with IBS referred to a tertiary center in London, UK between January 2010 to June 2011 and January 2013 to November 2014. INTERVENTION: Participants in one trial were randomized to receive either low FODMAP dietary counseling or sham control dietary counseling. In the other, they were randomized to receive low FODMAP dietary counseling or to continue habitual diet. All advice was provided by a specialist dietitian. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Habitual (usual) dietary intake at baseline (n=130) and after a 4-week intervention period was measured using 7-day food records. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Analysis of covariance and χ2 tests evaluated differences across groups at 4 weeks. RESULTS: When examining habitual intake of individuals with IBS, fiber intake was low, with only 6 (5%) achieving the target (30 g/day). In those receiving low FODMAP advice, there was no difference in intake of most nutrients compared with controls. However, there was lower intake of starch (109 g/day) vs habitual control diet (128 g/day; P=0.030), and higher intake of vitamin B-12 (6.1 µg/day) vs habitual (3.9 µg/day) and sham control diets (4.7 µg/day; P<0.01). Overall scores for diet quality were lower after low FODMAP advice vs habitual control diet (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates many individuals with IBS fail to meet dietary reference values for multiple nutrients. A 4-week low FODMAP diet, when delivered by a specialist dietitian, does not impact on intake of most nutrients or diet diversity but decreases diet quality compared with control diets.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Diet, Healthy/statistics & numerical data , Eating/physiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Nutrients/analysis , Adult , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Female , Fermentation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Nutritional Requirements , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage
17.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 120(4): 641-649, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31103370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) has gained increasing acceptance for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome but safety concerns have been raised regarding nutritional adequacy. Changes in nutrient intake during the elimination phase of the low-FODMAP diet remain predominantly unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in the mean reported daily nutrient content before and after 4 weeks of a low-FODMAP diet vs modified National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (mNICE) dietary intervention and to identify nutritional inadequacies based on comparison to the Dietary Reference Intakes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea subtype. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial entailing a 4-week trial period comparing the low-FODMAP and mNICE diets. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A total of 78 patients (41 low FODMAP and 37 mNICE) meeting the Rome III criteria for irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea subtype were consecutively recruited from gastroenterology and primary care clinics at the University of Michigan Medical Center between October 2012 and November 2015. METHODS: Participants randomized to the low-FODMAP arm were instructed to decrease their dietary intake of FODMAPs, whereas participants randomized to the mNICE intervention arm were instructed to eat small frequent meals, avoid trigger foods, and avoid excess alcohol and caffeine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post hoc evaluation for presence of micronutrient deficiencies per Dietary Reference Intakes when implementing low-FODMAP vs mNICE dietary interventions. Dietary intake was analyzed via 3-day food diaries at baseline and during the final week of the assigned diet. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: A post hoc analysis utilizing either a t test or χ2 analysis was conducted between before and after data. RESULTS: Both diets resulted in fewer daily kilocalories consumed, fewer number of daily meals consumed, and less daily carbohydrate intake. Among the patients following the low-FODMAP diet, there was a statistically significant decrease from baseline in several micronutrients, which was not observed in the mNICE cohort. However, these differences in the low-FODMAP group remained significant only for riboflavin after correcting for calorie-adjusted nutrient intake. Comparing Dietary Reference Intakes of participants pre- and postintervention, fewer patients met the Dietary Reference Intakes for thiamin and iron in the low FODMAP group, and for calcium and copper in the mNICE group. CONCLUSIONS: During a 4-week dietary intervention, the mean daily intake of most micronutrients remained stable and within the Recommended Dietary Allowances for both diets. Although decrease in several micronutrients was observed with implementation of the low-FODMAP diet relative to the mNICE diet, most of these disappeared after adjusting for energy intake.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/diet therapy , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Energy Intake , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Micronutrients/analysis , Adult , Aged , Diarrhea/etiology , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Female , Fermentation , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Recommended Dietary Allowances , United States , Young Adult
18.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 36(2): 147-154, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850930

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fermentable oligosaccharides disaccharides monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) dietary restriction ameliorates irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms; however, not all individuals with IBS respond. Given the gut microbiome's role in carbohydrate fermentation, investigators have evaluated whether the gut microbiome may predict low FODMAP diet efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Gut microbiome fermentation, even to the same carbohydrate, is not uniform across all individuals with several factors (e.g. composition) playing a role. In both children and adults with IBS, studies are emerging suggesting the gut microbiome may predict low FODMAP diet efficacy. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the approaches (study population, microbiome assessment methods, statistical techniques, etc.) used amongst these studies. SUMMARY: The gut microbiome holds promise as a predictor of low FODMAP diet efficacy. However, further investigation using standardized approaches to evaluate the microbiome while concomitantly assessing other potential predictors are needed to more rigorously evaluate this area.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Polymers/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/metabolism , Fermentation , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diet therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/metabolism , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology , Monosaccharides/metabolism , Oligosaccharides/metabolism , Polymers/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
19.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 38(5): 378-390, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802437

ABSTRACT

A diet low in poorly absorbed, fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) is now considered as an effective strategy for symptoms control in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The low FODMAP diet is administered in three phases, namely restriction of all dietary FODMAPs followed by rechallenge and then reintroduction of specific FODMAPs according to the tolerance of patients. A dietician should be involved in patients in whom a low FODMAP diet is planned. While restricting high FODMAPs, it is pertinent that patients are advised a well-balanced diet and suitable alternatives with low FODMAP contents in each food groups are prescribed. Strict adherence to a low FODMAP diet has been shown to improve symptoms, stool output, quality of life, and the overall well-being of patients with IBS. For those who do not respond to this dietary approach, a normal diet may be initiated and other treatment strategies (dietary or nondietary) should be considered. Interestingly, the low FODMAP diet has also been tried in other functional disorders, nonceliac gluten sensitivity, and even inflammatory bowel disease. Since the concept of FODMAP is relatively new, there is only limited data on the content of FODMAP in the Indian food items and there is a need to address this question. There is also a need for well-designed and adequately powered studies to explore the efficacy of low FODMAP diet in patients with IBS. In the present review article, we have compiled all the relevant information about FODMAPs with an objective to provide comprehensive information on FODMAPs to a physician.


Subject(s)
Carbohydrates/chemistry , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/chemistry , Fermentation , Humans , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Monosaccharides/chemistry , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/chemistry , Polymers/administration & dosage , Polymers/chemistry
20.
J Control Release ; 315: 186-196, 2019 12 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654684

ABSTRACT

To increase vaccine immunogenicity, modern vaccines incorporate adjuvants, which serve to enhance immune cross-protection, improve humoral and cell-mediated immunity, and promote antigen dose sparing. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family are promising targets for development of agonist formulations for use as vaccine adjuvants. Combinations of co-delivered TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands have been demonstrated to have synergistic effects on innate and adaptive immune response. Here, we create liposomes that stably co-encapsulate CRX-601, a synthetic TLR4 agonist, and UM-3004, a lipidated TLR7/8 agonist, within the liposomal bilayer in order to achieve co-delivery, allow tunable physical properties, and induce in vitro and in vivo immune synergy. Co-encapsulation demonstrates a synergistic increase in IL-12p70 cytokine output in vitro from treated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs). Further, co-encapsulated formulations give significant improvement of early IgG2a antibody titers in BALB/c mice following primary vaccination when compared to single agonist or dual agonists delivered in separate liposomes. This work demonstrates that co-encapsulation of TLR4 and lipidated TLR7/8 agonists within the liposomal bilayer leads to innate and adaptive immune synergy which biases a Th1 immune response. Thus, liposomal co-encapsulation may be a useful and flexible tool for vaccine adjuvant formulation containing multiple TLR agonists.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/administration & dosage , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Animals , Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Synergism , Female , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/immunology , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/pharmacology , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Liposomes , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Monosaccharides/immunology , Monosaccharides/pharmacology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/agonists , Toll-Like Receptor 7/agonists , Toll-Like Receptor 8/agonists , Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...