Mucositis-associated bloodstream infections in adult haematology patients with fever during neutropenia: risk factors and the impact of mucositis severity.

PURPOSE: Haematology patients with high-risk neutropenia are prone to mucosal-barrier injury-associated laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBI). We assessed risk factors for MBI-LCBI including candidaemia in neutropenic haematology patients with fever. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in six dedicated haematology units in the Netherlands. Eligible haematology patients had neutropenia < 500/mL for ≥ 7 days and had fever. MBI-LCBIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions and were followed until the end of neutropenia > 500/mL or discharge. RESULTS: We included 416 patients from December 2014 until August 2019. We observed 63 MBI-LCBIs. Neither clinical mucositis scores nor the blood level of citrulline at fever onset was associated with MBI-LCBI. In the multivariable analysis, MASCC-score (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.29 per point decrease), intensive chemotherapy (OR 3·81, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.90) and Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei) colonisation (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.75 to 16.7) were retained as risk factors for MBI-LCBI, while quinolone use seemed protective (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.92). Citrulline level (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.31 per µmol/L decrease), active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 15.4, 95% CI 1.61 to 14.7) and colonisation with fluconazole-resistant Candida (OR 8.54, 95% CI 1.51 to 48.4) were associated with candidaemia. CONCLUSION: In haematology patients with fever during neutropenia, hypocitrullinaemia at fever onset was associated with candidaemia, but not with bacterial MBI-LCBI. Patients with intensive chemotherapy with a low MASCC-score and colonisation with Pichia kudriavzevii had the highest risk of MBI-LCBI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02149329) at 19-NOV-2014.

Results of the study of factors predicting the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis during radiation or chemoradiation therapy in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancer.

BACKGROUND: Today, a number of methods and ways of prevention and treatment of radiation- -induced mucositis of the oral cavity and oropharynx have been developed, but the represented approaches are still not effective enough. Therefore, to increase the effectiveness of the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced mucositis, it is necessary to approach this problem comprehensively and individually, and to evaluate the factors affecting the development of mucositis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center prospective controlled non-randomized clinical trial, the results of clinical observation of the development of complications of radiation and chemoradiation therapy in 105 patients with a newly diagnosed squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx were analyzed. Factors affecting the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis including the age, gender of the patients, their general condition before the treatment according to World Health Organisation scales, type of the treatment and its doses, additional use of immunotherapy with alpha/beta defensins, characteristic signs of the tumor process and all indices of the immune status of the patients before the treatment have been analyzed. RESULTS: The method of construction and analysis of one-factor logistic regression models, where 24 indices were analyzed as factorial features, showed that the reduction of the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis is predicted by several factors: immunotherapy, gender, serum concentrations of IgG and IgA. A decrease (P < 0.001) in the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis was revealed if immunotherapy with alpha/beta defensins (with a total dose of 40 mg) was included into the treatment scheme (relative odds (RO) 0.05; 95% reference interval (RI) 0.02-0.18), in comparison with patients of the groups where it was not present or this immune agent was used in a total dose of 60 mg (P = 0.001, RO 0.06; 95% RI 0.01-0.30). The next factorial sign was gender, namely the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis was lower for men (P = 0.003; RO 0.15; 95% RI 0.04-0.53) compared to women. An increase (P = 0.024) in the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis with an increase in the initial level of IgG serum concentration was revealed, (RO 1.08; 95% RI 1.01-1.16) for each 1 mg/mL, as well as an increase (P = 0.044) in the possibility of the appearance of grade III radiation-induced mucositis with an increase in the serum concentration of IgA (RO 1.23; 95% RI 1.01-1.50) for every 1 mg/mL also before the beginning of the treatment. Multifactorial analysis has also confirmed that the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis increases (P = 0.008) with a high serum IgG concentration before the treatment or with an increase in this index during therapy (RO 1.13; 95% RI 1.03-1.09) for every 1 mg/mL (when standardized by other risk factors). It was determined that when standardizing according to other factors (gender, IgG level), the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis in the use of the immune agent alpha/beta defensins in a total dose of 40 mg per course decreases (P < 0.001; RO 0.08; 95% RI 0.02-0.27) compared to patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancer who were not treated with immunotherapy. The risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis also decreases (P = 0.001) in the use of immunotherapy in a higher dose, i.e. 60 mg per course (RO 0.03; 95% RI 0.004-0.24 compared to patients whose treatment did not include immunotherapy (when standardized by other factors). CONCLUSION: As a result of this controlled clinical study, some factors were determined in addition to the radiation as those affecting the risk of the development of grade III radiation-induced mucositis in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancer during special treatment. These factors comprise the inclusion of immunotherapy with alpha/beta defensins into the specific treatment; gender, and baseline levels of serum IgG and IgA concentrations suggest a pattern in which the higher the serum IgG and IgA concentrations are before the start of the treatment, the greater is the likelihood of severe radiation-induced mucositis degree during special therapy. The results of the study of humoral state of the immune system in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancer before the beginning of chemoradiation therapy can be used as prognostic risk factors for the development of severe gamma-irradiation-induced mucositis of the oropharyngeal area, as well as an indication for the use of immunotherapeutic agents (in particular, alpha/beta defensins) that are able to polarize the immune response towards type 1 T-helpers through their immunomodulatory action.

Development of an Ex Vivo Functional Assay for Prediction of Irradiation Related Toxicity in Healthy Oral Mucosa Tissue.

Radiotherapy in the head-and-neck area is one of the main curative treatment options. However, this comes at the cost of varying levels of normal tissue toxicity, affecting up to 80% of patients. Mucositis can cause pain, weight loss and treatment delays, leading to worse outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an approach to predicting normal mucosal responses in patients prior to treatment. We here describe an assay to detect irradiation responses in healthy oral mucosa tissue. Mucosa specimens from the oral cavity were obtained after surgical resection, cut into thin slices, irradiated and cultured for three days. Seven samples were irradiated with X-ray, and three additional samples were irradiated with both X-ray and protons. Healthy oral mucosa tissue slices maintained normal morphology and viability for three days. We measured a dose-dependent response to X-ray irradiation and compared X-ray and proton irradiation in the same mucosa sample using standardized automated image analysis. Furthermore, increased levels of inflammation-inducing factors-major drivers of mucositis development-could be detected after irradiation. This model can be utilized for investigating mechanistic aspects of mucositis development and can be developed into an assay to predict radiation-induced toxicity in normal mucosa.

Plasma Cell Mucositis: A Clinical Conundrum.

Plasma cell mucositis (PCM) is an unusual disorder most evident in the accessible mucosa and usually reported in the upper aerodigestive tract, although it is named according to its specific anatomical site of involvement such as plasma cell cheilitis, plasma cell gingivitis, plasma cell vulvitis, and Zoon's balanitis. PCM reflects a dense polyclonal rather than a monoclonal plasma cell proliferation of unclear and unknown etiology. This perplexing disorder tends to be treated by avoiding possible triggers and intralesional and/or systemic steroids. In this work, we provide a review and update on PCM, which often represents a clinical conundrum.

Updated perspectives on the contribution of the microbiome to the pathogenesis of mucositis using the MASCC/ISOO framework.

Advances in the treatment of cancer have significantly improved mortality rates; however, this has come at a cost, with many treatments still limited by their toxic side effects. Mucositis in both the mouth and gastrointestinal tract is common following many anti-cancer agents, manifesting as ulcerative lesions and associated symptoms throughout the alimentary tract. The pathogenesis of mucositis was first defined in 2004 by Sonis, and almost 20 years on, the model continues to be updated reflecting ongoing research initiatives and more sophisticated analytical techniques. The most recent update, published by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO), highlights the numerous co-occurring events that underpin mucositis development. Most notably, a role for the ecosystem of microorganisms that reside throughout the alimentary tract (the oral and gut microbiota) was explored, building on initial concepts proposed by Sonis. However, many questions remain regarding the true causal contribution of the microbiota and associated metabolome. This review aims to provide an overview of this rapidly evolving area, synthesizing current evidence on the microbiota's contribution to mucositis development and progression, highlighting (i) components of the 5-phase model where the microbiome may be involved, (ii) methodological challenges that have hindered advances in this area, and (iii) opportunities for intervention.

An unmet need for pharmacology: Treatments for radiation-induced gastrointestinal mucositis.

Gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) continues to be a significant issue in the management of abdominal cancer radiation treatments and chemotherapy, causing significant patient discomfort and therapy interruption or even cessation. This review will first focus on radiotherapy induced GIM, providing an understanding of its clinical landscape. Subsequently, the aetiology of GIM will be reviewed, highlighting diverse contributing factors. The cellular and tissue damage and associated molecular responses in GIM will be summarised in the context of the underlying complex biological processes. Finally, available drugs and pharmaceutical therapies will be evaluated, underscoring their insufficiency, and highlighting the need for further research and innovation. This review will emphasize the urgent need for improved pharmacologic therapeutics for GIM, which is a key research priority in oncology.

Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Agents in the Prevention of Chemoradiation-Induced Mucositis: A Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Mucositis is a pathological condition characterised by inflammation and ulceration of the mucous membranes lining the alimentary canal, particularly in the mouth (oral mucositis) and the gastrointestinal tract. It is a common side effect of cancer treatments, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and it is sometimes responsible for treatment interruptions. Preventing mucositis throughout the alimentary tract is therefore crucial. However, current interventions mainly target either oral or gastrointestinal side effects. This review aimed to investigate the use of systemically administered anti-inflammatory agents to prevent mucositis in cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment. PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov were screened to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The published literature on anti-inflammatory agents provides mixed evidence regarding the degree of efficacy in preventing/reducing the severity of mucositis in most anticancer treatments; however, sample size continued to be a significant limitation, alongside others discussed. Our review yielded a list of several anti-inflammatory agents that exhibit potential mucositis-preventive effects in cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment, which can be used to inform clinical practice.

Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: key features and differences.

Peri-implant diseases are frequent complications that occur around osseointegrated endosseous implants and are the result of an imbalance between the bacterial challenge and host response. Peri-implant diseases may affect the peri-implant mucosa only (peri-implant mucositis) or also involve the supporting bone (peri-implantitis). Early detection of peri-implant diseases and timely treatment is important for the success of dental implant treatment. Peri-implant probing is essential to assess the peri-implant health status and should be done at each recall visit. Dental practitioners should be familiar with the clinical and radiological features of both conditions in order to make an accurate diagnosis and determine the appropriate treatment required. This article aims to provide clinicians with an understanding of the key differences between peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.

Mechanistic insights into behavioral clusters associated with cancer-related systemic inflammatory response.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This focused, narrative review mostly describes our team's investigations into the potential inflammatory mechanisms that contribute to the development of cancer-related gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis and its associated symptoms. This review summarizes details of our clinical and preclinical findings to test the role of inflammation in the development and occurrence of these cancer-related conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: GI mucositis (GIM) is a common, distressing condition reported by cancer patients. GIM is often clustered with other behaviors including fatigue, pain, anorexia, depression, and diarrhea. It is hypothesized that there is a common biologic mechanism underpinning this symptom cluster. Our multi-platform investigations revealed that GIM and its associated cluster of behaviors may be triggered by local inflammation spreading systemically causing pro-inflammatory-mediated toxicities, leading to alterations in immune, metabolic, and nervous system functions and activities. For example, behavioral toxicities related to local irradiation for non-metastatic cancer may be triggered by mGluR5 activation influencing prolonged T cell as well as NF-κB transcription factor activities. Thus, interventions targeting inflammation and associated pathways may be a reasonable strategy to alleviate GIM and its symptom cluster. SUMMARY: GIM may be a sign of a broader systemic inflammatory response triggered by cancer or its treatment. Addressing GIM and its associated symptoms primarily involves supportive care strategies focused on relieving symptoms, promoting healing, and preventing complications.

Peri-implant diseases and systemic inflammation: A preliminary analysis from a cross-sectional survey of patients with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between peri-implant diseases and systemic inflammation assessed by serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in a sample of patients with hypertension. METHODS: A total of 151 participants with hypertension were included in a cross-sectional study. The population was divided into six groups according to their peri-implant and periodontal status (healthy controls, mucositis, peri-implantitis, periodontitis, periodontitis and mucositis, periodontitis, and peri-implantitis). Linear, logistic regression, and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: CRP levels were statistically significantly higher in participants with periodontitis alone (median 3.2 mg/L, interquartile range [IQR] 1.8, p = 0.012), combined with mucositis (3.10 mg/L, IQR 2.35, p < 0.001) or peri-implantitis (2.7 mg/L, IQR 2.53, p = 0.002) when compared to the healthy controls (1 mg/L, IQR 1.2). This association was independent of age, sex, smoking status, and adiposity differences. Participants with periodontitis with and without peri-implant diseases had the greatest odds of exhibiting CRP > 3 mg/L (odds ratio = 7.3, 95% confidence interval 1.6-33.9). CONCLUSIONS: Peri-implant diseases are associated with systemic inflammation, but the nature of the association should be further investigated.

Association between oral and fecal microbiome dysbiosis and treatment complications in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The oral and gastrointestinal mucosae represent the main targets of the toxic effect of chemo and/or radiotherapy administered during the conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). These harmful consequences and the immunological complications that may occur after the transplant (such as Graft versus Host Disease, GvHD) are responsible for the clinical symptoms associated with mucositis during the aplasia phase, like pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. These toxicities could play a critical role in the oral and gastrointestinal microbiomes during the post-transplant phase, and the degree of microbial dysbiosis and dysregulation among different bacterial species could also be crucial in intestinal mucosa homeostasis, altering the host's innate and adaptive immune responses and favoring abnormal immune responses responsible for the occurrence of GvHD. This prospective pediatric study aims to analyze longitudinally oral and gut microbiomes in 17 pediatric patients who received allogeneic HSCT for malignant and non-malignant diseases. The oral mucositis was mainly associated with an increased relative abundance of Fusobacteria, and Prevotella species, while Streptococcus descendants showed a negative correlation. The fecal microbiome of subjects affected by cutaneous acute GvHD (aGvHD) correlated with Proteobacteria. Oral mucosal microbiota undergoes changes after HSCT, Fusobacteria, and Prevotella represent bacterial species associated with mucositis and they could be the target for future therapeutic approaches, while fecal microbiome in patients with acute GvHD (aGvHD) revealed an increase of different class of Proteobacteria (Alphaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria) and a negative correlation with the class of Gammaproteobacteria.

Comparative Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein Levels among Peri-Implant Health and Disease Conditions.

Peri-implant disease pathogenesis results in production of pro-inflammatory mediators, among which C-reactive protein (CRP) is one of the acute phase reactants. The aim of the study was to comparative CRP levels among peri-implant health and disease conditions. The present study was carried out in the Department of Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, India. A total of 40 patients with peri-implant health (n = 10), peri-mucositis (n = 10), early peri-implantitis (n = 10) and advanced peri-implantitis (n = 10) were enrolled. Unstimulated salivary samples were collected and subjected to latex agglutination assay for CRP analysis. CRP levels were then correlated with peri-implant health and diseases. CRP level in peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, early peri-implantitis and advanced peri-implantitis were 0.18 ± 0.04 mg/dL, 2.05 ± 0.61 mg/dL, 4.14 ± 1.82 mg/dL and 6.21 ± 1.35 mg/dL respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in CRP levels between all the tested groups (ANOVA, P = 0.03). Pearson correlation coefficient analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between CRP and peri-implant health status. CRP level was high among patients with peri-implantitis followed by peri-implant mucositis and peri-implant health. Also, CRP level increases with severity of peri-implant diseases and there exists a positive correlation between CRP level and peri-implant health status.

Influence of keratinized mucosa width on the resolution of peri-implant mucositis: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of peri-implant diseases, driven by biofilm accumulation and influenced by factors such as the width of keratinized mucosa (KM), underscores the need for understanding their etiology and management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between the KM width and the clinical resolution of peri-implant mucositis after mechanical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis were allocated to two groups: wide band of KM (WKM ≥ 2 mm) and narrow/no band of KM (NKM < 2 mm). Data and submucosa biofilm were collected at baseline and at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after nonsurgical therapy. A Brunner-Langer model was estimated for longitudinal data to evaluate and compare changes in any clinical parameter throughout follow-up between both groups. Furthermore, the microbial profiles were evaluated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 38 implants were analyzed. At 24 weeks, bleeding on probing was substantially reduced in both groups, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.001). Treatment resulted in 23.9% less effective in achieving success for NKM. As such, NKM reduced the odds of disease resolution by 80% compared to WKM. The rest of the explored clinical parameters yielded more favorable outcomes for WKM versus NKM. Neither the alpha nor the beta diversity of the microbial profiles were significantly modulated by KM. CONCLUSIONS: KM width influences the clinical resolution of peri-implant mucositis after mechanical therapy (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04874467?cond=keratinized%20mucosa&rank=8, NCT04874467, 04/30/2021).

Evaluation of the efficacy of inter-dental brush and dental floss for peri-implant mucositis: A crossover randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the most effective method for mechanical inter-dental plaque removal between inter-dental brushes (IDB) and dental floss (DF), in addition to toothbrushing in patients affected by peri-implant mucositis (PIM); to identify possible factors related to the patient or to the single implant-supported element that could influence plaque accumulation and inflammation of peri-implant tissues. METHODS: Forty patients with PIM were recruited. They were randomly assigned to two different groups depending on inter-dental device used (IDB or DF). At baseline (T0), interproximal area (IA), interproximal emergence angle of the implant crown (A°) and manual dexterity (evaluated with Purdue Pegboard) have been recorded. At 14 days (T1), the inter-dental cleaning devices have been inverted between groups. After 14 days (T2), the Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) have been recorded. A questionnaire has been submitted to a patient for the analysis of preferences at T0, T1 and T2. RESULTS: Both inter-dental cleaning devices were effective in reducing PI and GI in the inter-dental area after 14 days of use. GI reduction was influenced by manual dexterity of the dominant hand. No significant differences were found for PI and GI at the variation of IA and A°. CONCLUSION: IDB was the most effective method for inter-dental plaque removal in all subjects regardless of their manual dexterity. DF seems to be more effective than IDB only in subjects with good dexterity.

Accelerated hypofractionated chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer during COVID 19 pandemic: A tertiary care experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of Accelerated Hypofractionated Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head & Neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) during COVID 19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously untreated 20 patients with locally advanced HNSCC (Oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx) were treated with definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy of 60Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent cisplatin @35 mg/m2 once weekly for 5 weeks from March 2020 to November 2021. The patients were treated on 6MV LINAC with Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by the Sequential boost technique and concurrent chemotherapy @35 mg/m2. All the patients received 48Gy in 20 fractions to low-risk volume (CTV LR) in Phase I followed by 12Gy in 5 fractions boost to High-risk volume (CTV HR) in Phase II. The organs at risk (OARs) were contoured and appropriate constraints were given considering the hypofractionated regimen. RESULTS: Out of 20 patients, most of the patients were Stage IV (15;75%) & stage III 20%, out of which (55%) 11 were of the oral cavity, (40%) 8 were of the oropharynx, and (5%) 1 of larynx. All patients were treated with 60Gy/25#/5 weeks with the majority of the patients (17;85%) completing their treatment in less than 45 days. The Median follow-up was of 214 days. The locoregional control at 6 Months was 55%. Maximum acute toxicity was grade 3 mucositis which was observed in 18 (90%) patients. Ryle's tube feeding was needed in 11 (55%) patient. Out of 20 patients, 5 patients did not receive concurrent chemotherapy, and 8 (40%) patients received all 5 cycles of chemotherapy. 7, 35% of the patients could not complete all 5 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy due to grade 3 mucositis. CONCLUSION: During a pandemic crisis with limited manpower & technical resources accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy can be considered a feasible therapeutic option for HNSCC which can significantly reduce the overall Treatment Time (OTT) with comparable local control and manageable toxicities.

Utilization of Photobiomodulation for the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis.

Background: Oral mucositis is a significant and common toxicity experienced by patients who receive high-dose chemotherapy as a preparatory regimen for a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been found to be feasible with significant efficacy in preventing the progression of oral mucositis in adult patients undergoing HCT. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of PBM in pediatric oncology patients undergoing HCT. Method: Forty children and adolescents admitted to the transplant unit for an allogeneic HCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia were treated daily at six sites until day + 20 or engraftment. Results: There were 1,035 patient encounters, with successful treatment of four or more sites during 979 patient encounters for a feasibility 93.3% CI [0.926, 0.039]. We had estimated a meaningful effect size of 20% for PBM and estimated 51% of patients treated with PBM would have at least one day or more of Grade 3 mucositis. The rate of patients who received PBM and developed Grade 3 mucositis was 20% CI [0.091, 0.356]. Patients treated with PBM had fewer days of hospitalization (p = .009) and less severe mucositis in comparison to the matched control group (p = .03). Conclusion: PBM is feasible and effective in preventing and treating oral mucositis and is now supported by the Children's Oncology Group for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing an allogeneic HCT or receiving head/neck radiation.

Mucositis oral como efecto adverso al uso del metotrexato en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide: una revisión sistematizada de casos / Oral mucositis as an adverse effect of the use of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematized review of cases

Introducción: el metotrexato se usa ampliamente para el tratamiento de una variedad de enfermedades neoplásicas y autoinmunes. Sin embargo, como todo fármaco, su eficacia viene marcada por cierto grado de toxicidad debido a la farmacocinética del medicamento. El metotrexato se creó como un fármaco anticancerígeno; sin embargo, se ha convertido en el tratamiento de elección contra la artritis reumatoide. Principalmente, el metotrexato causa inflamación de las mucosas epiteliales. La mayoría de los efectos secundarios del metotrexato se pueden detectar de forma temprana y son reversibles. La mucositis del tracto alimentario es el principal efecto secundario de la quimioterapia contra el cáncer. Se le conoce colectivamente como lesión de la mucosa inducida por quimioterapia, afecta todo el canal alimentario desde la boca hasta el ano, ocasionando la mucositis oral y la mucositis intestinal. Material y métodos: se buscaron casos clínicos en los que se reporte mucositis causada por metotrexato en tratamiento de artritis reumatoide. Se empleó un diagrama de flujo, PRISMA modificado para la búsqueda de artículos. Finalmente, se cotejó que los casos clínicos cumplieran con los fundamentos de la CARE guide, para manejar una correcta estructura y bajo riesgo a sesgo. Conclusiones: una correcta anamnesis y exploración clínica oral es lo más importante de la medicina oral. Es relevante indagar sobre las enfermedades que presentan los pacientes, así como la historia de medicamentos que se administren, especialmente en pacientes mayores, con mayores padecimientos de enfermedades sistémicas (AU)

Introduction: methotrexate is widely used for the treatment of a variety of neoplastic and autoimmune diseases. However, like all drugs its efficacy is marked by a certain degree of toxicity due to the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Methotrexate was developed as an anticancer drug, however, it has become the treatment of choice for rheumatoid arthritis. Methotrexate primarily causes inflammation of the epithelial mucous membranes. Most of the side effects of methotrexate can be detected early and are reversible. Mucositis of the alimentary tract is the main side effect of cancer chemotherapy. It is collectively known as chemotherapy-induced mucosal injury, affecting the entire alimentary canal from the mouth to the anus, where oral mucositis and intestinal mucositis are both common. Material and methods: we searched for clinical cases reporting mucositis caused by methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, using a modified PRISMA flowchart to search for articles. Finally, the clinical cases were checked for compliance with the fundamentals of the CARE guide, in order to manage a correct approach to oral medicine. It is important to inquire about the diseases the patients present, as well as the history of medications administered, especially in older patients, with more systemic disease conditions, structure, and low risk of bias. Conclusion: a correct anamnesis and oral clinical examination is the most important aspect of oral medicine. It is important to inquire about the diseases that the patients present, as well as the history of medications that are administered, especially in older patients with major systemic diseases (AU)

Impact of keratinized mucosa on implant-health related parameters: A 10-year prospective re-analysis study.

AIM: To investigate whether the lack of keratinized mucosa (KM) affects peri-implant health after 10 years of loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 74 patients with 148 implants from two randomized controlled studies comparing different implant systems were included and analyzed. Clinical parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), plaque index, marginal bone loss (MBL), and KM width (KMW) at buccal sites were collected at baseline (time of the final prosthesis insertion), 5-year and 10 years postloading. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models by means of a generalized estimated equation (GEE) were used to evaluate the influence of buccal KM on peri-implant clinical parameters; BOP, MBL, PD, and adjusted for implant type (one-piece or two-piece) and compliance. RESULTS: A total of 35 (24.8%) implants were healthy, 67 (47.5%) had mucositis and 39 (27.6%) were affected by peri-implantitis. In absence of buccal KM (KM = 0 mm), 75% of the implants exhibited mucositis, while in the presence of KM (KMW >0 mm) 41.2% exhibited mucositis. Regarding peri-implantitis, the corresponding percentages were 20% (KM = 0 mm) and 26.7% (KM >0 mm). Unadjusted logistic regression showed that the presence of buccal KM tended to reduce the odds of showing BOP at buccal sites (OR: 0.28 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.09], p = 0.06). The adjusted logistic regression model revealed that having buccal KM (OR: 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.85], p = 0.02) and using two-piece implants (OR: 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.75], p = 0.008) significantly reduced the odds of showing BOP. Adjusted linear regression by means of GEE showed that KM and two-piece implants were associated with reduced MBL and MBL changes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The lack of buccal KM appears to be linked with peri-implant parameters such as BOP and MBL, but the association is weak. The design of one-piece implants may account for their increased odds of exhibiting BOP.