ABSTRACT
A total of 154 food samples (chicken, fish, and ready-to-eat sprouts) from various retail outlets in Mumbai, India, were analyzed for the presence of Aeromonas spp. over a period of 2 y (January 2006 to March 2008). Twenty-two Aeromonas isolates belonging to 7 different species were isolated from 18 (11.7%) food samples. The highest percentages of isolation were from chicken (28.6%) followed by fish (20%) and sprout (2.5%) samples. Aeromonas caviae, A. veronii bv. sobria, and A. salmonicida were the most frequently isolated species from sprouts, chicken, and fish samples, respectively. The genes encoding for putative virulence factors, cytotoxic enterotoxin (act), hemolysin (hly), aerolysin (aer), elastase (ahyB), and lipase (lip) were detected using polymerase chain reaction method in 59.1%, 40.9%, 22.7%, 54.5%, and 31.8% of the strains, respectively. The isolated Aeromonas strains were found to be positive for virulence factors, that is, amylase, DNase, gelatinase, protease, and lipase production. More than 60% isolates were also positive for ß-hemolytic activity. All these food isolates were found to be resistant to ampicillin and bacitracin, and sensitive to gentamicin, 3rd-generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cephotaxime, ceftriaxone), and chloramphenicol. Seventeen (77.2%) isolates harbored single and/or multiple plasmids (approximately 5 to >16 kb). The XbaI digestion patterns of chromosomal DNA of these isolates, using pulsed field gel electrophoresis, showed high genetic diversity among these isolates. Our results demonstrate the presence of various Aeromonas spp. with virulence potential and antimicrobial resistance in different food products marketed in Mumbai, India. The potential health risks posed by consumption of these raw or undercooked food products should not be underestimated.
Subject(s)
Aeromonas/drug effects , Aeromonas/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Food Microbiology , Aeromonas/genetics , Animals , Chickens , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Fishes , India , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/microbiology , Plasmids/genetics , Seedlings/microbiology , Virulence Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
Salmonella is one of the most important foodborne pathogens associated with severe diseases in animals and humans. Meat samples are considered as one of the main sources of Salmonella infections. Consequently, the survey of Salmonella contamination in meat samples is of outmost importance for the control and prevention of severe diseases. In this study, 250 meat samples were selected for surveys of Salmonella contaminations. Results indicated that 12% (n=30) of samples tested were positive to Salmonella. The genetic characterization of 30 Salmonella was studied by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR), and 22 of ERIC-PCR types were found with D of 94.8%. In addition, the resistant characterization was also carried out using nine antibiotics test, and nine resistant patterns were observed with D of 88.7%. A good correlation was also observed between ERIC-PCR fingerprinting and resistant patterns in some Salmonella such as SAL 6 and SAL 7.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Microbial , Genotype , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle/microbiology , Chickens/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Salmonella/drug effects , Swine/microbiologySubject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Food Microbiology , Animals , Dairy Products/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Eggs/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/transmission , Fluoroquinolones , Humans , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/microbiology , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/drug effects , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/transmission , Seafood/microbiology , Vegetables/microbiologyABSTRACT
AIM: To determine whether gastric and enteric Helicobacter species are associated with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer (n = 40), neuroendocrine cancer (n = 14), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (n = 8), and chronic pancreatitis (n = 5) were studied. Other benign pancreatic diseases (n = 10) and specimens of normal pancreas (n = 7) were included as controls. Pancreatic tissue specimens were analyzed by Helicobacter-specific PCR-assay and products were characterized by denaturing gradient electrophoresis and DNA-sequencing. From a subset of the pancreatic cancer patients, gastric and/or duodenal tissue as well as gallbladder and ductus choledochus tissue were analyzed. Gallbladder and choledochus samples were included as controls. Stomach and duodenum samples were investigated to analyze whether a gastric helicobacter might disseminate to the pancreas in pancreatic cancer patients. Pancreatic specimens were analyzed by Bacteroides-specific PCR for detecting the translocation of indigenous gut microbes to the diseased pancreas. RESULTS: Helicobacter DNA was detected in pancreas (tumor and/or surrounding tissue) of 75% of patients with exocrine cancer, 57% of patients with neuroendocrine cancer, 38% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia, and 60% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. All samples from other benign pancreatic diseases and normal pancreas were negative. Thirty-three percent of the patients were helicobacter-positive in gastroduodenal specimens. Surprisingly, H. bilis was identified in 60% of the positive gastroduodenal samples. All gallbladder and ductus choledochus specimens were negative for helicobacter. Bacteroides PCR-assay was negative for all pancreatic samples. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter DNA commonly detected in pancreatic cancer suggests a possible role of the emerging pathogens in the development of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
