Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
J Epidemiol ; 31(8): 464-470, 2021 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mumps vaccination coverage is low in Japan, partly because of its voluntary nature. Although pediatric cases of mumps virus infection are captured by the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases program under the Infectious Disease Law, there are currently no data regarding the occurrence of mumps and its complications in adults. METHODS: We investigated the annual incidence rates of mumps and its complications based on health insurance reimbursement data for 5,209,660 individuals aged 0-64 years for 2005-2017, obtained from JMDC Inc., to estimate the mumps-related disease burden during this period. RESULTS: There were three mumps outbreaks (2006, 2010, and 2016) during 2005-2017. The annual incidence of mumps was highest in individuals aged 0-5 years (808-3,792 per 100,000 persons), followed by those aged 6-15 years (658-2,141 per 100,000 persons). The incidence of mumps was higher in females than in males (male/female ratio, 0.90). Among mumps-related complications, the overall incidence (per 1,000 mumps cases) was highest for orchitis (6.6), followed by meningitis (5.8), deafness (1.3), pancreatitis (0.5), and encephalitis (0.3). No cases of oophoritis were noted. The overall incidence of mumps-related complications was 2.5 times higher in males than in females. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the disease burden due to mumps and its complications in Japan during 2005-2017. These data suggest the need for mumps-prevention measures in adolescents and adults, as well as in children.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps/complications , Mumps/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps/economics , Young Adult
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 116-123, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30807459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate costs of labor and materials by the University of Washington (UW) and state and local public health departments (PHDs) to respond to the February to June 2017 UW mumps outbreak, where 42 cases were identified among students (primarily sorority and fraternity members), staff, and associated community members. DESIGN: We applied standard cost analysis methodology using a combined public health and university perspective to examine the cost of responding to the outbreak. SETTING: UW's Seattle campus encompasses 703 acres with approximately 32 000 undergraduate students. Nearly 15% of the undergraduate population are members of fraternities or sororities. Housing for the fraternities and sororities is adjacent to the UW campus and consists of 50 houses. PARTICIPANTS: During the outbreak, customized costing tools based on relevant staff or faculty positions and activities were provided to the UW and Public Health-Seattle & King County, populated by each person participating in the outbreak response, and then collected and analyzed. Laboratory hours and material costs were collected from the Washington Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Labor and material costs provided by the UW and PHDs during the outbreak were collected and categorized by payer and activity. RESULTS: Total costs to the UW and PHDs in responding to the outbreak were $282 762 ($6692 per case). Of these, the UW spent $160 064, while PHDs spent $122 098. Labor accounted for 77% of total outbreak costs, and UW response planning and coordination accounted for the largest amount of labor costs ($75 493) overall. CONCLUSIONS: Given the current university and public health department budget constraints, the response to the outbreak amounted to a significant use of resources. Labor was the largest driver of costs for the outbreak response; UW labor costs-related to campus response planning and coordination-dominated the total economic burden from public health and university perspectives.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mumps/economics , Public Health/economics , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mumps/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Universities/organization & administration , Washington/epidemiology
3.
Vaccine ; 38(6): 1481-1485, 2020 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31818532

ABSTRACT

On August 8, 2016, a confirmed case of mumps was reported to the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH) in an adult resident of Springdale, Arkansas. By July 2017, nearly 3,000 cases of mumps were reported to ADH from 37 of the 75 counties in Arkansas. Over 50% of cases were in the Arkansas Marshallese community, a close-knit community characterized by large, and extended families sharing the same living space and communal activities. In a statewide effort, ADH collaborated with CDC, the Republic of the Marshall Island's (RMI) Ministry of Health, and the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) to rapidly respond to and contain the outbreak. We assessed the economic burden to ADH of the outbreak response in terms of containment and vaccination costs, as well as response costs incurred by CDC, RMI, and ADE. The 2016-2017 Arkansas mumps outbreak was the second largest US mumps outbreak in over 30 years and was unique in size, spread, and population affected. Total public health response costs as a result of the outbreak were over $2.1 million, approximately $725 per case. The costs incurred to control this outbreak reflect the response strategies tailored to the affected populations, including consideration of social, cultural, and political factors in controlling transmission and requirements of distinctive strategies for public health outreach. Aside from the burden these outbreaks have on the affected population, we demonstrate the potential for high economic burden of these outbreaks to public health.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Mumps , Adult , Arkansas/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Humans , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Public Health/economics , Vaccination/economics
4.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 96(5): 1215-1221, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500809

ABSTRACT

AbstractMumps, a highly contagious, viral disease continues to spread in India, despite the availability of an effective vaccine. On November 24, 2014, we came across a suspected case of mumps in a 6-year-old boy in a village of Bhusandapur sector in Odisha. We initiated an outbreak investigation using standard techniques outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. This uncovered a silent epidemic of 94 case patients (10% of the population) over a period of 16 weeks between August and December 2014, in a single village, which had gone completely unnoticed by the existing health-care system. Since the index case was one of the last case patients of the outbreak, investigation for immediate control was not a priority. Hence, we have used this exercise to describe the outbreak and identify causes that led to its nondetection. Age range of the case patients was between 2 and 40 years; 85 (90.4%) case patients were ≤ 15 years of age and 54 (57.4%) were females. Average duration of illness was 9 days. No child had received the mumps vaccine. The outbreak had led to a community expenditure of 538 USD. The exercise uncovered a number of weak links in the essential public health services within the health-care delivery system in the area.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps virus/physiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Public Health Surveillance , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Government Programs , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/economics , Mumps/transmission
6.
Health Serv Res ; 52(1): 176-190, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26997351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand the relationship between state-level spending by public health departments and the incidence of three vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs): mumps, pertussis, and rubella in the United States from 1980 to 2009. DATA SOURCES: This study uses state-level public health spending data from The Census Bureau and annual mumps, pertussis, and rubella incidence counts from the University of Pittsburgh's project Tycho. STUDY DESIGN: Ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects, and random effects regression models were tested, with results indicating that a fixed effects model would be most appropriate model for this analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Model output suggests a statistically significant, negative relationship between public health spending and mumps and rubella incidence. Lagging outcome variables indicate that public health spending actually has the greatest impact on VPD incidence in subsequent years, rather than the year in which the spending occurred. Results were robust to models with lagged spending variables, national time trends, and state time trends, as well as models with and without Medicaid and hospital spending. CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that there is evidence of a significant, negative relationship between a state's public health spending and the incidence of two VPDs, mumps and rubella, in the United States.


Subject(s)
Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Mumps/epidemiology , Public Health/economics , Rubella/epidemiology , State Government , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Least-Squares Analysis , Mumps/economics , Mumps/prevention & control , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis , Rubella/economics , Rubella/prevention & control , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/prevention & control
7.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 37(8): 1121-6, 2016 Aug 10.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27539345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic effect of Measles, Mumps and Rubella Combined Attenuated Live Vaccine (MMR) under different two-dose vaccination programs. METHODS: A hypothetical birth cohort of 750 000 infants over their lifetime, was followed up from birth through death in Zhejiang province. The current MMR vaccination strategie would include three different ones: 1) Childlern were vaccinated with Measles-Rubella Combined Attenuated Live Vaccine and MMR, respectively at the age of 8 months and 18 months. 2) Children receive MMR at 8 months and 18 months, 3) Strategy 1 plus an additional vaccination of MMR at 4 years of age. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICBR) and incremental net benefit (INB) were applied to calculate the health economic difference for Strategy 2 and Strategy 3 as compared to Strategy 1. Univariate sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness of results with main parameters, including the rate of immunization coverage, effectiveness of the vaccines, incidence and burdens of the related diseases, cost of vaccines and the vaccination program itself. RESULTS: ICER, ICBR and INB for Strategy 2 and Strategy 3 appeared as 2 012.51∶1 RMB Yuan per case and 4 238.72∶1 RMB Yuan per case, 1∶3.14 and 1∶1.58, 21 277 800 RMB Yuan and 9 276 500 RMB Yuan, respectively. Only slight changes (<20%) were found under the univariate sensitivity analysis, with varied values on main parameters. CONCLUSION: Based on the current national immunization program, infants vaccinated with MMR at 8 months of age, generated more health economic effects than the Strategy 3.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Immunization Programs/economics , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/economics , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Measles/economics , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella/economics , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/economics
8.
Int J Public Health ; 61(7): 847-60, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27488917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Despite the availability of vaccines and the existence of public vaccination recommendations, outbreaks of vaccine-preventable childhood diseases still cause public health debate. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the current epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies published since 2000. The literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE. Also, we used German notification data to give an up-to-date overview of the epidemiology of the four diseases under consideration. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included in our review. Results suggest that there is still considerable morbidity due to childhood diseases in Germany. Studies providing cost estimates are scarce. Comparative analyses of different data sources (notification data vs. claims data) revealed a potential underestimation of incidence estimates when using notification data. Furthermore, several studies showed regional differences in incidence of some of the diseases under consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underline the need for improved vaccination and communication strategies targeting all susceptible age and risk groups on a national and local level.


Subject(s)
Virus Diseases/economics , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox Vaccine , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Measles/economics , Measles/epidemiology , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Vaccines, Combined
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(5): 1373-81, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24633360

ABSTRACT

Studies assessing the economic burden of a mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated population are limited. The Orange County Health Department (OCHD), New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a mumps investigation in an affected village with a highly vaccinated population. To understand the epidemiology, standardized mumps case definition and active surveillance were used to identify mumps cases. In addition, an economic assessment of a combined outbreak investigation and third dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine intervention conducted by OCHD and NYS DOH was performed; estimated by retrospectively evaluating public health response-related activities including use of a third dose of MMR vaccine. From September 24, 2009, through June 15, 2010, 790 mumps cases were reported-64% were male and highest attack rate was among 11-17 year age group (99.1 cases per 1000 individuals). Of the 658 cases with known vaccination history, 83.6% had documentation of 2 doses of mumps containing vaccine. No deaths were reported. The 2 major exposure settings were schools (71.8%) and households (22.5%). Approximately 7736 h of public health personnel time were expended with the total approximate cost of US $463,000, including US $34,392 for MMR vaccine-the estimated cost per household was US $827. Mumps continues to be endemic in many parts of the world, resulting in importations into the United States. Large mumps outbreaks similar to this in highly vaccinated populations may require considerable investigation and control activities.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Health Care Costs , Mumps Vaccine/economics , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , New York/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
10.
Vaccine ; 31(24): 2661-6, 2013 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23602654

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this study, we modeled the cost benefit analysis for three different measles vaccination strategies based upon three different measles-containing vaccines in Korea, 2001. We employed an economic analysis model using vaccination coverage data and population-based measles surveillance data, along with available estimates of the costs for the different strategies. In addition, we have included analysis on benefit of reduction of complication by mumps and rubella. METHODS: We evaluated four different strategies: strategy 1, keep-up program with a second dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine at 4-6 years without catch-up campaign; strategy 2, additional catch-up campaign with measles (M) vaccine; strategy 3, catch-up campaign with measles-rubella (MR) vaccine; and strategy 4, catch-up campaign with MMR vaccine. The cost of vaccination included cost for vaccines, vaccination practices and other administrative expenses. The direct benefit of estimated using data from National Health Insurance Company, a government-operated system that reimburses all medical costs spent on designated illness in Korea. RESULTS: With the routine one-dose MMR vaccination program, we estimated a baseline of 178,560 measles cases over the 20 years; when the catch-up campaign with M, MR or MMR vaccines was conducted, we estimated the measles cases would decrease to 5936 cases. Among all strategies, the two-dose MMR keep-up program with MR catch-up campaign showed the highest benefit-cost ratio of 1.27 with a net benefit of 51.6 billion KRW. CONCLUSION: Across different vaccination strategies, our finding suggest that MR catch-up campaign in conjunction with two-dose MMR keep-up program was the most appropriate option in terms of economic costs and public health effects associated with measles elimination strategy in Korea.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication/economics , Disease Eradication/methods , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/economics , Measles/economics , Measles/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Measles/epidemiology , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles Vaccine/economics , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Models, Economic , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps Vaccine/economics , Public Health/economics , Public Health/methods , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Rubella/economics , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Rubella Vaccine/economics , Vaccination/economics
11.
Vaccine ; 30(45): 6444-8, 2012 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22902678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The United States Territory of Guam reported a large mumps outbreak of 505 cases during 2009-2010. We assessed the economic impact of the outbreak from the perspectives of the local public health sector and affected families. METHODS: Using standard cost analysis methods, we retrospectively identified all public health personnel involved in the outbreak response and surveyed them about their outbreak-related activities. We then estimated the costs of outbreak-related personnel hours and materials. We also assessed out-of-pocket costs and costs incurred for work-time missed for persons with mumps and their families. We defined the analysis period as February 25-October 22, 2010. RESULTS: Seventy-six public health personnel were involved in outbreak response activities. Overall, the response required approximately 8264 person-hours, 2380 miles driven, and 3000 doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine ordered. The cost to the public health sector was 256,785 U.S. dollars (USD). Families of 102 persons with mumps were interviewed. An estimated 761 USD per person with mumps was spent by families; 88% of this cost was due to missed days of work. The estimated total cost to families of the 470 persons with mumps during the analysis period was 357,670 USD. Total outbreak-related costs were 614,455 USD. CONCLUSIONS: The costs reported underscore the impact of mumps outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations and the need for effective mumps prevention and control strategies.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Mumps/economics , Public Health/economics , Public Sector/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Family , Female , Guam/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Health Personnel/economics , Humans , Infant , Male , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Young Adult
12.
J Commun Dis ; 44(1): 29-36, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24455913

ABSTRACT

An unexpected clustering of mumps cases were reported in a slum of Kolkata during early part of 2009. An epidemiological investigation was initiated with a view to assess the characteristics and determinants of the disease, and implications of such clustering of cases in a slum of Kolkata. Data were collected through house to house visit using predesigned schedule and epidemiological case sheet. The propagated outbreak existed for fifteen weeks yielding 104 clinical cases. On the whole, attack rate was 4.7%, the highest and lowest being in 6-10 years (11.68%) and above 15 years (0.94%), respectively. The parotid swelling was bilateral in 92.3% of cases; fever was the most common general symptom, reportedly present in 92.3% of study subjects. The overall mean duration of parotid swelling was 6.85 +/- 1.89 days. Morbidity from mumps far exceeds the mortality rate. Improved ventilation of living rooms, personal & oral hygiene; isolation of cases, upgradation of routine immunization, better nutrition etc. were recommended at family & community level and introduction of MMR vaccine in National Immunization Schedule was suggested.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Poverty Areas , Adolescent , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant , Male , Mumps/economics
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 16(3): 426-32, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20202417

ABSTRACT

In 2006, nearly 6,000 mumps cases were reported in the United States, 795 of which occurred in Illinois. In Chicago, 1 healthcare institution experienced ongoing transmission for 4 weeks. This study examines the outbreak epidemiology and quantifies the financial affect on this organization. This retrospective cohort study was conducted through case and exposure identification, interviews, medical record reviews, and immunologic testing of blood specimens. Nine mumps cases resulted in 339 exposures, 325 (98%) among employees. During initial investigation, 186 (57%) of the exposed employees had evidence of mumps immunity. Physicians made up the largest group of noncompliers (55%) with mumps immunity testing. The cost to the institution was $262,788 or $29,199 per mumps case. The outbreak resulted in substantial staffing and financial challenges for the institution that may have been minimized with readily accessible electronic employee vaccination records and adherence to infection control recommendations.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/economics , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chicago/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Interviews as Topic , Mumps/economics , Mumps/transmission , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/immunology , Occupational Exposure
14.
J Infect Dis ; 189 Suppl 1: S131-45, 2004 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15106102

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the economic impact of the current 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination program in the United States, a decision tree-based analysis was conducted with population-based vaccination coverage and disease incidence data. All costs were estimated for a hypothetical US birth cohort of 3803295 infants born in 2001. The 2-dose MMR vaccination program was cost-saving from both the direct cost and societal perspectives compared with the absence of MMR vaccination, with net savings (net present value) from the direct cost and societal perspectives of US dollars 3.5 billion and US dollars 7.6 billion, respectively. The direct and societal benefit-cost ratios for the MMR vaccination program were 14.2 and 26.0. Analysis of the incremental benefit-cost of the second dose showed that direct and societal benefit-cost ratios were 0.31 and 0.49, respectively. Varying the proportion of vaccines purchased and administered in the public versus the private sector had little effect on the results. From both perspectives under even the most conservative assumptions, the national 2-dose MMR vaccination program is highly cost-beneficial and results in substantial cost savings.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/economics , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Incidence , Infant , Measles/economics , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella/economics , Rubella/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics
15.
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol ; 50(1): 31-5, 2001 Feb.
Article in Slovak | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11233671

ABSTRACT

The epidemiological situation as regards measles, rubella and mumps in Slovakia before vaccination and after its introduction in 1996, is analysed. On the basis of model costs of treatment of these diseases before vaccination and costs of treatment in 1996 including costs of vaccination, the authors calculated the total saved costs (549.7 mil. Sk), cost-effectiveness (10,680 Sk), as well as the cost-benefit.


Subject(s)
Measles/economics , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella/economics , Rubella/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Slovakia/epidemiology , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence
16.
Vaccine ; 16(9-10): 989-96, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9682349

ABSTRACT

In 1992, because of the limitations of the one-dose measles immunization program, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommended a two-dose measles immunization program to eliminate measles. More recently, NACI recommended also a special catch-up program to prevent predicted measles outbreaks and to achieve an earlier elimination of measles. The objective of this study was to complete a benefit-cost analysis of a two-dose immunization program with and without a mass catch-up compaign compared with the current one-dose program. The resulting benefit: cost ratios vary between 2.61:1 and 4.31:1 depending on the strategy used and the age of the children targeted. Given the parameters established for this analysis, the benefits of a second-dose vaccination program against measles far outweight the costs of such a program under all scenarios.


Subject(s)
Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles Vaccine/economics , Adolescent , Age Factors , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Measles/economics , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps/economics , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps Vaccine/economics , Rubella/economics , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/economics , Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/prevention & control , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Rubella Vaccine/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/economics
17.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 52(4): 401-12, 1998.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10321084

ABSTRACT

Effective attenuated live virus mumps vaccines have been available for more than 30 years. Vaccine strains have been developed on various cell culture systems; the attenuated mumps virus strain most commonly used is the Jeryl Lynn strain. Various vaccines differ in their immunogenicity, efficacy and associated adverse events. It is estimated that the immunization coverage needed to block the transmission of mumps virus is at least 70%. Models indicate that low to moderate levels of mumps vaccine coverage may actually increase the number of susceptibles and the number of cases in older age groups. Benefit-cost analyses in a number of countries have found that the introduction of mumps vaccine is economically justifiable, as vaccination can avert the considerable medical and economic costs associated with mumps morbidity. Countries that do not immunize against mumps continue to register high mumps morbidity, and pay a high toll from neurological and other complications of mumps. Poland, which already has a high level of measles vaccine coverage, should make efforts to replace monovalent measles vaccine with trivalent measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.


Subject(s)
Mumps Vaccine/economics , Mumps Vaccine/therapeutic use , Mumps , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Global Health , Humans , Infant , Male , Mumps/economics , Mumps/immunology , Mumps/prevention & control , Poland/epidemiology
18.
Pediatrics ; 84(5): 779-84, 1989 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2797973

ABSTRACT

The reported incidence of mumps has declined dramatically since licensure of the live attenuated mumps vaccine in the United States in 1967, particularly in young children. Because administration of the vaccine was not widely practiced during the first decade it was available, there is now a cohort of teenagers and young adults who are relatively underimmunized. Reported mumps cases in this cohort increased substantially during 1986 to 1987. Mumps outbreaks at three Illinois universities, from which 123 clinical cases were reported between September 1986 and May 1987, were investigated. Meningeal involvement was reported in 17% of case-patients, orchitis occurred in 19% of 64 men, 6% of patients were hospitalized, and direct health care costs were estimated at $264 per case and more than $32,000 for the three outbreaks combined. The risk of mumps illness was greater for students less than 20 years of age (relative risk [RR] = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4, 3.1); students residing in dormitories (RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6, 4.6); and out-of-state students (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0, 3.0). Because the available data suggest that mumps in college-aged persons is due chiefly to a failure to vaccinate susceptible persons, colleges and universities should become one major focus of mumps prevention activities to reduce susceptibility in this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Mumps/epidemiology , Universities , Adolescent , Adult , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Female , Humans , Illinois , Male , Mumps/economics , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Student Health Services/economics
19.
Am J Public Health ; 79(4): 471-4, 1989 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2494895

ABSTRACT

The US Army's experience with mumps hospitalizations was examined for the years 1980 through 1986. One hundred fifty-two cases among active duty Army soldiers were identified. Mumps rates declined from 3.85 per 100,000 active duty soldiers per year in 1980 to 1.28 in 1985, but an outbreak during 1986 caused rates to jump to 6.65. Attack rates were found to decline dramatically with increasing age or length of military service, with 74 per cent of cases occurring in soldiers with three years or less of service. Rates for Blacks and Whites were similar, but were higher for other minorities. Complications reported were mild. A cost-benefit analysis, assuming all recruits were to be vaccinated, estimated average annual vaccination program costs of $286,789; this figure exceeds average annual reported hospitalized mumps disease costs of $61,525 by a factor of 4.7. Mumps attack rates would have to reach at least 15.0 per 100,000 per year before savings would equal recruit vaccination costs. Failure to show that a vaccine program would be cost-saving may be due to limitations in identifying cases or to the requirement that all recruits be immunized regardless of prior immune status. It is likely that a program to immunize susceptible individuals alone would show benefit.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Mumps Vaccine , Mumps/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , United States
20.
J Infect Dis ; 158(6): 1253-60, 1988 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3198938

ABSTRACT

During a county-wide mumps outbreak in Nashville, Tennessee, 332 cases of mumps were identified at a public high school (attack rate, 18.8%). A pep rally 17 d before the peak of the outbreak at a single public high school may have provided an opportunity for point-source exposure. A case-control study demonstrated that vaccine efficacy was 75% (we used provider-verified records and excluded students with a history of mumps disease). Although school records were nonuniform, mumps immunization status was correct, compared with provider-verified records, in at least 85% of both cases and controls. Parental reports were much less reliable. The cost of the outbreak was estimated at $154/case. Receiving mumps vaccine at a vaccine clinic held after the outbreak had peaked was associated with a decrease in risk of mumps disease. Thus, these clinics may have a role in the control of such outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Immunization , Mumps/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mumps/economics , Mumps Vaccine , Risk Factors , Tennessee
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...